make provision about health and social care.
The Health Bill is a Government Bill tabled by a Minister of the Crown.
Is this Bill currently before Parliament?Yes. This Bill was introduced on 14 May 2026 and is currently before Parliament.
Whose idea is this Bill?Government Bills implement the legislative agenda of the Government. This agenda, and the Bills that will implement it, are outlined in the Queen's Speech at the Session's State Opening of Parliament.
What type of Bill is this?Government Bills are technically Presentation Bills, but the Government can use its legislative time to ensure the schedule of debates to scrutinise the Bill.
So is this going to become a law?Though the Bill can be amended from its original form, the Bill will almost certainly be enacted in law before the end of the Session, or will be carried over to the subsequent Session.
How can I find out exactly what this Bill does?The most straightforward information is contained in the initial Explanatory Notes for the Bill.
Would you like to know more?See these Glossary articles for more information: Government Bills, Process of a Bill
Official Bill Page Initial Explanatory Notes Initial Briefing papers Ministerial Extracts from Debates All Bill Debates
Next Event: Tuesday 3rd November 2026 - Committee stage
Last Event: Wednesday 28th October 2026 - Committee stage: Minutes of Proceedings (part two) (Lords)
Bill Progession through Parliament
None 98A
Baroness Penn (Con)Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert—
“(2B) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, the responsible local authority and each of its partner integrated care boards must—
(a) consider the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment for children of all ages in the authority’s area, and in particular for children aged 0 to 5, and
(b) where the assessment of relevant needs identifies needs relating to those effects or risks, set out in the plan how those needs are to be met.
(2C) Guidance issued under subsection (4) must include guidance on how authorities should discharge their duties under subsection (2B), including how to involve health visitors, school nurses and family hubs.
(2D) In subsection (2B)—
“children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools;
“effects on health and development” includes effects on—
(a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development,
(b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight,
(c) eyesight, and
(d) mental health and wellbeing;
“risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
None 279F
Baroness Penn (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Children’s digital environment: guidance and training for health professionals in England
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish guidance for health professionals on the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment.
(2) The guidance must apply to children of all ages and must in particular address children aged 0 to 5.
(3) The guidance must draw on advice from health professionals, researchers and academics, must be consistent with any guidance for parents and carers on screen use published by the Secretary of State, and must address—
(a) the effects of children’s digital environment on health and development at different ages, including for children with special educational needs or disabilities,
(b) recommended limits on screen time, screen-free times and places to promote children’s health,
(c) the effect of parents’ and carers’ own use of devices on children’s health, and
(d) how to raise these matters with children, parents and carers in a supportive, non-judgemental way, and where to refer or signpost them for further support.
(4) The Secretary of State must exercise functions under section 1F of the National Health Service Act 2006 (duty as to education and training) with a view to ensuring that education and training on the guidance is available to health professionals who work with children and their families, including health visitors, general practitioners, practice nurses, midwives, school nurses, speech and language therapists, community paediatricians, optometrists and staff of family hubs.
(5) Before publishing or revising the guidance, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including relevant professional bodies and royal colleges.
(6) The Secretary of State must review the guidance at least every three years.
(7) The Secretary of State must, within two years of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a report on the availability and uptake of the education and training under subsection (4).
(8) In this section—
“children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools;
“effects on health and development” includes effects on—
(a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development,
(b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight,
(c) eyesight, and
(d) mental health and wellbeing;
“risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
None 279G
Baroness Penn (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Children’s digital environment: universal health reviews in England
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, ensure that the Healthy Child Programme guidance, and any successor to it, includes provision on the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment.
(2) The guidance must provide that, as part of the universal health and development reviews offered to children aged 0 to 5 and their parents and carers, health professionals offer—
(a) information on guidance for parents and carers on screen use and online safety published by the Secretary of State;
(b) an opportunity to discuss—
(i) the child’s use of screens and digital technology,
(ii) parents’ and carers’ own use of devices,
(iii) screen-free routines, and
(iv) the risks of harm to the child’s health and development of their digital environment;
(c) where appropriate, further support or signposting.
(3) The guidance must make provision of a similar kind, appropriate to their age, for the health and development contacts offered to school-age children under the Healthy Child Programme.
(4) The Secretary of State must ensure that information on the matters in subsection (2)(b) is included in the personal child health record, in whatever form it is provided.
(5) In this section—
“children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools;
“effects on health and development” includes effects on—
(a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development,
(b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight,
(c) eyesight, and
(d) mental health and wellbeing;
“risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
None 279H
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Report on dementia care
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia;
(b) the provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must have regard to—
(a) any targets or standards set out in any national plan, guidance or framework relating to dementia services, and
(b) any other information the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) A report under subsection (1) must include—
(a) an assessment of variation in dementia services and outcomes between integrated care board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers of dementia patients,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the provision of NHS care and social care in relation to dementia.
None 279J
Baroness Rafferty (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of continued professional development for nurses and midwives
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must carry out a review of continued professional development for nurses and midwives.
(2) The review must in particular assess—
(a) the level of funding available for continued professional development for nurses and midwives, and
(b) the protected time available to nurses and midwives for continued professional development.
(3) The Secretary of State must publish a report of the findings of the review.”
None 279K
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Oversight of funeral service provider premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a body corporate, or confer functions on an existing public authority (“the regulator”), to provide oversight of the premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains by funeral service providers in England.
(2) The purpose of the regulator is to ensure that the activities undertaken under subsection (1) are consistent with the protection of public health.
(3) The regulator is independent in the exercise of its functions and is not to be regarded as a servant or agent of the Crown.
(4) Regulations under this section may, in particular, make provision for—
(a) a scheme for the registration of funeral service providers,
(b) the inspection of premises, vehicles and other facilities used by registered providers for the storage, preparation, care or transportation of deceased persons, or from which funeral services are arranged or conducted,
(c) the publication and enforcement of a code of practice for the funeral services sector, and
(d) the imposition of sanctions, including suspension or removal from the register, for breach of that code.
(5) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) providers of funeral services,
(b) such persons representing the interests of bereaved people as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and
(c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(6) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 279L
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Remit of the Human Tissue Authority
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by order under section 14(4) of the Human Tissue Act 2004, amend the remit of the Human Tissue Authority to include the regulation of funeral directors, private mortuaries, direct cremation services and other organisations which transport or hold the bodies of deceased persons for the purposes of ensuring that the carrying out of their functions is consistent with the protection of public health.
(2) The Authority must establish and maintain a register of the bodies subject to its oversight under subsection (1).
(3) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument make further provision regarding the establishment and operation of the register under subsection (2).
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (3) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 172B
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Termination of the NHS Federated Data Platform contract
(1) The Secretary of State must take all necessary steps to ensure that the contract with Palantir Technologies UK Limited (“Palantir”) for the provision of the NHS Federated Data Platform is not extended beyond its initial contractual term ending on 15 February 2027.
(2) The Secretary of State must ensure that the first available contractual right to terminate or decline to extend that contract is exercised.
(3) The Secretary of State must not enter into, or permit any relevant NHS body to enter into, a replacement agreement with Palantir Technologies UK Limited or an associated undertaking for the provision of substantially the same national NHS data infrastructure.
(4) Within three months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a plan for the transfer of the functions of the Federated Data Platform to infrastructure under public control.
(5) The plan must include arrangements to ensure continuity of NHS services, the secure transfer of data and the termination of the access to NHS systems and data of Palantir and its subcontractors, subject only to access strictly necessary for a time-limited transition.
(6) The Secretary of State must report to Parliament every three months on progress in implementing the plan until the transfer is complete.”
This amendment requires the Government to end the NHS Federated Data Platform contract with Palantir at the first available contractual opportunity, prevents substantially equivalent replacement arrangements, and requires a transition to publicly controlled infrastructure.
None 279R
Baroness Deech (XB)After Schedule 11, insert the following new Schedule—
“SCHEDULE
AMENDMENTS TO THE HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 1990
Introduction
1 The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 is amended in accordance with this Schedule.
Duties
2 For section 8ZA, substitute—
“8ZA Duties in relation to carrying out its functions
(1) In exercising its functions under this Act, the Authority must have regard to the need to protect the health, safety, welfare and interests of—
(a) persons receiving, or considering receiving, treatment services;
(b) persons providing gametes or embryos for use in activities governed by this Act;
(c) persons who may be born as a result of treatment services;
(d) any other persons whose health, safety, welfare or interests may be materially affected by activities governed by this Act.
(2) In discharging its functions, the Authority must have regard, in particular, to the need to—
(a) promote safe and evidence-based treatment;
(b) protect persons from avoidable harm arising from treatment services;
(c) ensure that persons receiving or considering treatment services are provided with accurate and comprehensible information about the nature, risks, benefits and limitations of those services;
(d) promote compliance with the requirements of this Act and any regulations or licence conditions made under it.
(3) The Authority must exercise its regulatory functions effectively, proportionately, efficiently and economically having regard to the—
(a) nature and seriousness of any actual or potential risk to persons referred to in subsection (1);
(b) likelihood of that risk materialising;
(c) steps reasonably available to prevent or mitigate that risk;
(d) need to avoid imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on persons carrying on activities governed by this Act.”
Enforcement
3 After section 19C, insert—
“19D Enforcement notices
(1) Where the Authority is satisfied that a person has failed, or is failing, as described in section 18(2) (revocation of licence), the Authority may give the person a written notice (an “enforcement notice”) which requires the person to—
(a) take steps specified in the notice, or
(b) refrain from taking steps specified in the notice,
or both (see also section 19E).
(2) An enforcement notice specified under subsection (1) may only impose requirements which the Authority considers appropriate having regard to the failure (whether or not for the purpose of remedying the failure).
19E Enforcement notices: supplementary
(1) An enforcement notice must—
(a) state what the person has failed or is failing to do, and
(b) give the Authority’s reasons for reaching that opinion.
(2) In deciding whether to provide an enforcement notice specified under section 19D(1), the Authority must consider whether the failure has caused, or is likely to cause, any person damage or distress.
(3) An enforcement notice may specify the time or times at which, or period or periods within which, a requirement imposed by the notice must be complied with, subject to the restrictions in subsections (5) to (7).
(4) An enforcement notice must provide information about the—
(a) consequences of failure to comply with it, and
(b) rights under sections 21 (appeal on a point of law).
(5) An enforcement notice must not specify a time for compliance with a requirement in the notice which falls before the end of the period within which an appeal can be brought against the notice.
(6) If an appeal is brought against an enforcement notice, a requirement in the notice need not be complied with pending the determination or withdrawal of the appeal.
(7) If an enforcement notice—
(a) states that, in the Authority’s opinion, it is necessary for a requirement to be complied with urgently, and
(b) gives the Authority’s reasons for reaching that opinion,
subsections (5) and (6) do not apply but the notice must not require the requirement to be complied with before the end of the period of 24 hours beginning when the notice is given.
(8) In this section, “specified” means specified in an enforcement notice.
19F Enforcement notices: cancellation and variation
(1) The Authority may cancel or vary an enforcement notice by giving written notice to the person to whom it was given.
(2) A person to whom an enforcement notice is given may apply in writing to the Authority for the cancellation or variation of the notice.
(3) An application under subsection (2) may be made only—
(a) after the end of the period within which an appeal can be brought against the notice, and
(b) on the ground that, by reason of a change of circumstances, one or more of the provisions of that notice need not be complied with in order to remedy the failure identified in the notice.”
“Penalties
19G Penalty notices
(1) If the Authority is satisfied that a person has—
(a) failed or is failing as described in section 19D(1) (enforcement notices), or
(b) failed to comply with an enforcement notice,
the Authority may, by written notice (a “penalty notice”), require the person to pay the Authority an amount in sterling specified in the notice.
(2) When deciding whether to give a penalty notice to a person and determining the amount of the penalty, the Authority must have regard to the following, so far as relevant to the extent that the notice concerns another matter, matters listed in subsection (3).
(3) Matters which the Authority must have regard to in issuing a penalty notice include—
(a) the nature, gravity and duration of the failure;
(b) the intentional or negligent character of the failure;
(c) any action taken by the person to mitigate the damage or distress suffered by persons;
(d) any relevant previous failures by the person;
(e) the degree of co-operation with the Authority, in order to remedy the failure and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the failure;
(f) the categories of the failure in regards to licensable activities;
(g) the manner in which the infringement became known to the Authority, including whether, and if so to what extent, the person notified the Authority of the failure;
(h) the extent to which the person has complied with previous enforcement notices or penalty notices;
(i) adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms;
(j) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the case, including financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, as a result of the failure (whether directly or indirectly);
(k) whether the penalty would be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(4) Schedule 4AZA makes further provision about penalty notices, including provision requiring the Authority to give a notice of intent to impose a penalty and provision about payment, variation, cancellation and enforcement.
(5) The Secretary of State may by regulations—
(a) confer power on the Authority to give a penalty notice in respect of other failures to comply with the requirements of licensable activities, and
(b) provide for the maximum penalty that may be imposed in relation to such failures to be either the standard maximum amount or the higher maximum amount.
(6) Regulations under this section may—
(a) make provision about the giving of penalty notices in respect of the failure, and
(b) amend this section and section 19H (maximum amount of penalty).
(7) In this section, “higher maximum amount” and “standard maximum amount” have the same meaning as in section 19H.
19H Maximum amount of penalty
(1) In relation to a failure to comply with an enforcement notice, the maximum amount of the penalty that may be imposed by a penalty notice is the higher maximum amount.
(2) In relation to an infringement of a provision of this Act where subsection (1) does not apply the maximum amount of the penalty that may be imposed by a penalty notice is the standard maximum amount.
(3) The “higher maximum amount” is—
(a) in the case of an undertaking, £17,500,000 or 4% of the undertaking's total annual worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, or
(b) in any other case, £17,500,000.
(4) The “standard maximum amount” is—
(a) in the case of an undertaking, £8,700,000 or 2% of the undertaking's total annual worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, or
(b) in any other case, £8,700,000.
(5) The Secretary of State may by regulations—
(a) provide that a person of a description specified in the regulations is or is not an undertaking, and
(b) make provision about how an undertaking’s turnover is to be determined.
(6) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that a period is or is not a financial year.”
4 Before section 20 insert—
“Appeals etc”
5 In section 20 (right to reconsideration of licensing decisions), in subsections (1), (2) and (4), for “require” substitute “request”.
6 For section 21, substitute—
“21 Rights of appeal
(1) A person aggrieved by a decision on reconsideration in pursuance of a notice under section 20 (right to reconsideration of licensing decisions) may appeal to the court.
(2) A person who is given any of the following notices may appeal to the court—
(a) an enforcement notice;
(b) a penalty notice;
(c) a penalty variation notice.
21A Determination of appeals
(1) Subsections (2) to (4) apply where a person appeals to the court under section 21(1) or (2).
(2) The court may review any determination of fact on which the notice or decision against which the appeal is brought was based.
(3) If the court considers—
(a) that the notice or decision against which the appeal is brought is not in accordance with the law, or
(b) to the extent that the notice or decision involved an exercise of discretion by the Authority, that the Authority ought to have exercised the discretion differently,
the court must allow the appeal or substitute another notice or decision which the Authority could have given or made.
(4) Otherwise, the court must dismiss the appeal.
21B Applications in respect of urgent notices
(1) This section applies where an enforcement notice given to a person contains an urgency statement.
(2) The person may apply to the court for either or both of the following—
(a) the disapplication of the urgency statement in relation to some or all of the requirements of the notice;
(b) a change to the time at which, or the period within which, a requirement of the notice must be complied with.
(3) On an application under subsection (2), the court may do any of the following—
(a) direct that the notice is to have effect as if it did not contain the urgency statement;
(b) direct that the inclusion of the urgency statement is not to have effect in relation to a requirement of the notice;
(c) vary the notice by changing the time at which, or the period within which, a requirement of the notice must be complied with;
(d) vary the notice by making other changes required to give effect to a direction under paragraph (a) or (b) or in consequence of a variation under paragraph (c).
(4) The decision of the court on an application under this section is final.
(5) In this section, “urgency statement” means a statement under section 19E(7)(a).
21C Jurisdiction
(1) The jurisdiction conferred on a court by section 21 (rights of appeal) is exercisable—
(a) in England and Wales, by the High Court or the county court,
(b) in Scotland, by the Court of Session or the sheriff,
(c) in Northern Ireland, by the High Court or a county court,
subject to subsection (2).
(2) The jurisdiction conferred on a court by section 21B (applications in respect of urgent notices) is exercisable only by the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.”
7 In section 45(4A) (regulations), insert at the appropriate place— “sections 19G (penalty notices) and 19H (maximum amount of penalty);”.
8 After Schedule 3A insert—
“Schedule 3AZASection 19G
PENALTIES
Meaning of “penalty”
1 In this Schedule, “penalty” means a penalty imposed by a penalty notice.
Notice of intent to impose penalty
2 Before giving a person a penalty notice, the Authority must, by written notice (a “notice of intent”) inform the person that the Authority intends to give a penalty notice.
Contents of notice of intent
3 (1)A notice of intent must contain the following information—
(a)the name and address of the person to whom the Authority proposes to give a penalty notice;
(b)the reasons why the Authority proposes to give a penalty notice (see sub-paragraph (2));
(c)an indication of the amount of the penalty the Authority proposes to impose, including any aggravating or mitigating factors that the Authority proposes to take into account.
(2)The information required under sub-paragraph (1)(b) includes—
(a)a description of the circumstances of the failure, and
(b)the nature, gravity and duration of the failure.
(3)A notice of intent must also—
(a)state that the person may make written representations about the Authority’s intention to give a penalty notice, and
(b)specify the period within which such representations may be made.
(4)The period specified for making written representations must be a period of not less than 21 days beginning when the notice of intent is given.
(5)If the Authority considers that it is appropriate for the person to have an opportunity to make oral representations about the Authority’s intention to give a penalty notice, the notice of intent must also—
(a)state that the person may make such representations, and
(b)specify the arrangements for making such representations and the time at which, or the period within which, they may be made.
Giving a penalty notice
4 (1)This paragraph applies where the Authority gives a notice of intent to a person.
(2)Within the period of six months beginning when the notice is given, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, the Authority must give to the person—
(a)a penalty notice, or
(b)written notice that the Authority has decided not to give a penalty notice to the person.
(3)The Authority may not give a penalty notice to the person before a time, or before the end of a period, specified in the notice of intent for making oral or written representations.
(4)When deciding whether to give a penalty notice to the person and determining the amount of the penalty, the Authority must consider any oral or written representations made by the person in accordance with the notice of intent.
Contents of a penalty notice
5 (1)A penalty notice must contain the following information—
(a)the name and address of the person to whom it is addressed;
(b)details of the notice of intent given to the person;
(c)whether the Authority received oral or written representations in accordance with the notice of intent;
(d)the reasons why the Authority proposes to impose the penalty (see sub-paragraph (2));
(e)the reasons for the amount of the penalty, including any aggravating or mitigating factors that the Authority has taken into account;
(f)details of how the penalty is to be paid;
(g)details of the rights of appeal under section 21;
(h)details of the Authority’s enforcement powers under this Schedule.
(2)The information required under sub-paragraph (1)(d) includes—
(a)a description of the circumstances of the failure, and
(b)the nature, gravity and duration of the failure.
Period for payment of penalty
6 (1)A penalty must be paid to the Authority within the period specified in the penalty notice.
(2)The period specified must be a period of not less than 28 days beginning when the penalty notice is given.
Variation of penalty
7 (1)The Authority may vary a penalty notice by giving written notice (a “penalty variation notice”) to the person to whom it was given.
(2)A penalty variation notice must specify—
(a)the penalty notice concerned, and
(b)how it is varied.
(3)A penalty variation notice may not—
(a)reduce the period for payment of the penalty;
(b)increase the amount of the penalty;
(c)otherwise vary the penalty notice to the detriment of the person to whom it was given.
(4)If—
(a)a penalty variation notice reduces the amount of the penalty, and
(b)when that notice is given, an amount has already been paid that exceeds the amount of the reduced penalty,
the Authority must repay the excess.
Cancellation of penalty
8 (1)The Authority may cancel a penalty notice by giving written notice to the person to whom it was given.
(2)If a penalty notice is cancelled, the Authority—
(a)may not take any further action under section 19G or this Schedule in relation to the failure to which that notice relates, and
(b)must repay any amount that has been paid in accordance with that notice.
Enforcement of payment
9 (1)The Authority must not take action to recover a penalty unless—
(a)the period specified in accordance with paragraph 6 has ended,
(b)any appeals against the penalty notice have been decided or otherwise ended,
(c)if the penalty notice has been varied, any appeals against the penalty variation notice have been decided or otherwise ended, and
(d)the period for the person to whom the penalty notice was given to appeal against the penalty, and any variation of it, has ended.
(2)In England and Wales, a penalty is recoverable—
(a)if the county court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court;
(b)if the High Court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court.
(3)In Scotland, a penalty may be enforced in the same manner as an extract registered decree arbitral bearing a warrant for execution issued by the sheriff court of any sheriffdom in Scotland.
(4)In Northern Ireland, a penalty is recoverable—
(a)if a county court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court;
(b)if the High Court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court.”
9 (1)Schedule 3B is amended in accordance with this paragraph.
(2)In paragraph 2, after sub-paragraph (1) insert—
(1A)If requested to do so by the Secretary of State, the Authority must arrange for a duly authorised person to inspect any of the premises mentioned in sub-paragraph (3).
(1B)The Authority may arrange for a duly authorised person to inspect any of the premises referred to in sub-paragraph (3) in circumstances where it is not required to do so by sub-paragraph (1) or (1A).”
(3)After paragraph 2 insert—
“Considerations relating to inspection frequency
2A (1)In determining the frequency, timing and scope of inspections, the Authority must have regard to the risks associated with the activities authorised by the licence.
(2)The matters to which the Authority must have regard include—
(a)the nature and seriousness of any incident or suspected breach of a licence condition;
(b)complaints or concerns received from patients, donors, persons born as a result of treatment, or staff;
(c)the history of compliance by the licence holder;
(d)the adequacy of action taken in response to previous inspection findings;
(e)the risks to the health, safety or welfare of persons receiving or providing treatment, and to the security and integrity of gametes and embryos.
(3)The Authority must maintain and periodically review a database for assessing the risks referred to in this paragraph.
(4)The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision about the contents and information standards of the database.”
(4)After paragraph 8 insert—
“Action following an inspection”
(5)In paragraph 9 for sub-paragraph (5), substitute—
(5)The Authority must give a copy of the report or information to—
(a)the person requesting it, unless the Authority considers that it would be inappropriate to do so in the particular circumstances of the case, and
(b)the Secretary of State.
(6)The Authority must include in its annual report information about the exercise of its inspection and enforcement functions.
(7)The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision about the contents of reports under this paragraph.”
(6)After paragraph 9 insert—
“9A (1)Where an inspection identifies a material deficiency in the operation of licensed activities, the Authority must determine what further action is necessary and proportionate.
(2)The Authority may require the licence holder to submit and implement a corrective action plan within a specified period.
(3)A corrective action plan must specify—
(a)he deficiency to be addressed;
(b)the steps to be taken to address it;
(c)the person responsible for each step;
(d)the date by which each step to be complied.
(e)any other condition as may be specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(4)A corrective action plan must be sent to the Authority by such period as the Authority may specify.
(5)After receiving the corrective action plan, the Authority must within 28 days consider whether a further inspection is necessary under paragraph 2 to determine whether the deficiency has been remedied.
9BThe Secretary of State may by regulations make provision for the contents of an inspection report.”
10 In section 7 (reports to the Secretary of State), after subsection (2), insert—
“(2A) A report prepared under this section must include information about—
(a) inspections carried out by the Authority,
(b) a corrective action plan in place under paragraph 9A of Schedule 3B, and
(c) the improvements made to remedy any deficiencies in relation to such corrective action plan.”
Complaints
11 After section 8D, insert—
“8DA Complaints relating to licensed activities
(1) The Authority must establish and maintain procedures for receiving, assessing and investigating complaints relating to activities governed by this Act.
(2) The Authority must investigate a complaint where it has reasonable grounds to suspect—
(a) a serious breach of a requirement imposed by or under this Act;
(b) a material failure to comply with a licence condition;
(c) conduct presenting a significant risk to the health, safety or welfare of a person;
(d) a systemic failure affecting patients, donors or other persons materially affected by activities governed by this Act.
(3) The Authority must, as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving a complaint, determine whether any of the circumstances in subsection (2) apply.
(4) Where the Authority decides not to investigate a complaint, it must give the complainant a statement of reasons for that decision.
(5) Where the Authority investigates a complaint, it must—
(a) conduct the investigation as soon as reasonably practicable;
(b) keep the complainant reasonably informed of the progress of the investigation;
(c) notify the complainant of the outcome;
(d) give reasons for its findings and any regulatory action taken, subject to any lawful restriction on disclosure.
(6) The Authority may decline to investigate, or may suspend an investigation, where it considers that doing so is necessary and proportionate having regard to—
(a) the availability of a more appropriate procedure for determining the matter;
(b) ongoing civil or criminal proceedings;
(c) the vexatious or excessive use of the complaints procedure.
(7) The Authority must give a statement of reasons for a decision under subsection (6).”
Reporting in relation to licensable activities
12 (1)Section 17 (the person responsible) is amended in accordance with this paragraph.
(2)In subsection (1)(g), at end insert “; and of any prescribed near miss which indicates a material risk to the health, safety or welfare of a person or to the security or integrity of gametes or embryos.”
(3)After subsection (2) insert—
(2A)In subsection (1)(g) “prescribed” means prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State.””
13 After section 31B, insert—
“31C Reporting and investigation of serious adverse events
(1) The Authority must issue a code of practice establishing requirements governing the notification, recording and investigation of serious adverse events, serious adverse reactions and prescribed near misses arising in connection with licensable activities.
(2) The requirements must include provision about—
(a) the circumstances in which an incident or near miss must be notified to the Authority;
(b) the period within which notification must be given;
(c) the information to be included in a notification;
(d) the investigation and analysis of the causes of an incident or near miss;
(e) the identification and implementation of measures to prevent recurrence;
(f) the preservation of relevant records and electronic audit trails.
(3) The Authority must monitor notifications received under this section for the purpose of identifying recurring incidents, systemic failures and emerging risks.
(4) The Authority must publish information about significant trends identified under subsection (3), subject to the protection of personal data and confidential information.
(5) Requirements under this section must be proportionate to the seriousness and nature of the incident or near miss.
(6) The Authority may revise or revoke a code issued under this section.
(7) The Authority must send a copy of the code to the Secretary of State.
(8) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the code before each House of Parliament.”
14 In section 12 (general conditions), in subsection (1), after paragraph (g), insert—
“(h) that the responsible person will comply with any requirements of a code of practice issued under section 31C.”
Continuity plans
15 In Schedule 2, after paragraph 4, insert—
“Continuity plans
4A (1)The Authority must ensure that the conditions of a licence authorising the storage of gametes or embryos require the licence holder to maintain a continuity plan.
(2)A continuity plan must make provision for the safe and lawful management, transfer or disposal of gametes and embryos where—
(a)the licence expires or is revoked;
(b)the licence holder ceases to carry on the licensed activities;
(c)the licence holder becomes unable to carry on those activities safely;
(d)the Authority determines that urgent arrangements are necessary to protect persons or stored gametes or embryos.
(3)A continuity plan must also include provision for—
(a)the identification of an appropriately licensed facility to which storage activities may be transferred;
(b)the preservation and transfer of records, consent documentation and information necessary to maintain traceability;
(c)the notification of affected persons, so far as reasonably practicable;
(d)the maintenance of appropriate storage conditions pending transfer or other lawful disposition;
(e)the allocation of responsibility for implementing the plan.
(4)The Authority must assess the adequacy of a continuity plan when considering an application for a licence or its renewal and may require the plan to be revised.
(5)The Authority may require a licence holder to implement a continuity plan, in whole or in part, where it considers that this is necessary to protect the health, safety or welfare of persons or to secure the safe and lawful management of stored gametes or embryos.
(6)The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision in relation to the contents or requirements of continuity plans.””
This new Schedule amends the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 to make provision about the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
None 279M
Baroness Deech (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) amends the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 to make provision about the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.”
This amendment is consequential to others in the name of Baroness Deech.
Opposition Amendment 279N
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS-funded in vitro fertilisation
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations make arrangements for the standardised provision of NHS-funded in vitro fertilisation (IVF).
(2) Provision under this section must, in accordance with any existing NICE guidelines, set requirements for all integrated care boards in England relating to NHS-funded IVF.
(3) Requirements under subsection (2) must include—
(a) standardisation of the minimum number of rounds of IVF available to one individual, and
(b) standardisation of the maximum and minimum age at which an individual can access IVF.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations standardising NHS-funded IVF provision across all integrated care boards in England, in accordance with existing NICE guidelines, including the number of rounds available to an individual and the age limits for access.
None 288A
Baroness Deech (XB)Clause 87, page 65, line 11, at the end insert—
“(ga) section (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) and Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990);”
This amendment is consequential to others in the name of Baroness Deech.
None 290A
Baroness Deech (XB)Clause 88, page 65, line 25, at the end insert—
“(c) section (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) and Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990).”
This amendment is consequential to others in the name of Baroness Deech.
None 279P
Baroness Barran (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Safety of digital health technologies provided to children (1) An NHS body may only provide, prescribe or recommend a digital health technology for use by a child where it is satisfied that there is evidence that the technology is effective and safe for use by children of the relevant age, having regard to any relevant standards or guidance issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2) Before an NHS body provides, prescribes or recommends a digital health technology for use by a child, it must carry out an assessment of the risks of harm to that child arising from the use of the device on which the technology operates. (3) An assessment under subsection (2) must consider, in particular— (a) the extent to which use of the technology requires or encourages access to a digital technology device (especially during the night), (b) the risk that the device gives the child access to social media, messaging services, the internet or other content or services not needed for the technology to work, and (c) the age and needs of the child. (4) Where an NHS body provides, prescribes or recommends a digital health technology for use by a child, it must give the child’s parent or carer written advice on its safe use, including— (a) how to restrict access to other functions and content on the device, (b) the safe management of overnight use and alerts, and (c) the risks to children’s wellbeing associated with unrestricted digital technology device use. (5) Where the child is under the age of 16, the NHS body must take reasonable steps to ensure that the digital health technology is made available on— (a) a device dedicated solely to the use of that technology, or (b) a device configured so that access is restricted to that technology and to functions needed for the child’s safety, such as emergency calls. (6) Subsection (5) does not apply where— (a) a responsible clinician considers that compliance would be clinically inappropriate or would compromise the effective operation of the technology, or (b) the child’s parent or carer, having received the advice described in subsection (4), declines the arrangements described in subsection (5). (7) A decision under subsection (6) must be recorded in the child’s health record. (8) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force, issue guidance to NHS bodies on the discharge of their duties under this section, having consulted such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including representatives of children, parents and clinicians. (9) Subsection (1) does not apply, for a period of two years beginning with the day on which this section comes into force, to a digital health technology that was being provided, prescribed or recommended for use by children by an NHS body immediately before that day, provided that during that period the NHS body— (a) informs the child’s parent or carer that evidence of the technology’s effectiveness and safety for children of the relevant age has not yet been established, and (b) keeps the use of the technology under review. (10) In this section— “child” means a person under the age of 18; “digital health technology” means software, including a mobile application, provided for the purpose of monitoring, managing, diagnosing or treating a physical or mental health condition, including but not limited to continuous glucose monitoring and insulin management applications and mental health applications; “NHS body” has the meaning given in section 275 of the National Health Service Act 2006.”
None 279Q
Baroness Kidron (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Neural data The UK GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data) is amended as follows— (a) in paragraph 1 of Article 4 (definitions), after subparagraph (14) insert— “(14A) “neural data” means personal data generated by measuring the activity of the central or peripheral nervous system of a natural person, including any inferences from that data, including information that can be used to provide information about the thoughts or health of that person;”; (b) in Article 9 (processing of special categories of personal data), paragraph 1, after “person,” insert “neural data,”.”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Termination of the NHS Federated Data Platform contract (1) The Secretary of State must take all necessary steps to ensure that the contract with Palantir Technologies UK Limited (“Palantir”) for the provision of the NHS Federated Data Platform is not extended beyond its initial contractual term ending on 15 February 2027. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that the first available contractual right to terminate or decline to extend that contract is exercised. (3) The Secretary of State must not enter into, or permit any relevant NHS body to enter into, a replacement agreement with Palantir Technologies UK Limited or an associated undertaking for the provision of substantially the same national NHS data infrastructure. (4) Within three months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a plan for the transfer of the functions of the Federated Data Platform to infrastructure under public control. (5) The plan must include arrangements to ensure continuity of NHS services, the secure transfer of data and the termination of the access to NHS systems and data of Palantir and its subcontractors, subject only to access strictly necessary for a time-limited transition. (6) The Secretary of State must report to Parliament every three months on progress in implementing the plan until the transfer is complete.”
After Schedule 11, insert the following new Schedule— “SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS TO THE HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 1990 Introduction 1 The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 is amended in accordance with this Schedule. Duties 2 For section 8ZA, substitute— “8ZA Duties in relation to carrying out its functions (1) In exercising its functions under this Act, the Authority must have regard to the need to protect the health, safety, welfare and interests of— (a) persons receiving, or considering receiving, treatment services; (b) persons providing gametes or embryos for use in activities governed by this Act; (c) persons who may be born as a result of treatment services; (d) any other persons whose health, safety, welfare or interests may be materially affected by activities governed by this Act. (2) In discharging its functions, the Authority must have regard, in particular, to the need to— (a) promote safe and evidence-based treatment; (b) protect persons from avoidable harm arising from treatment services; (c) ensure that persons receiving or considering treatment services are provided with accurate and comprehensible information about the nature, risks, benefits and limitations of those services; (d) promote compliance with the requirements of this Act and any regulations or licence conditions made under it. (3) The Authority must exercise its regulatory functions effectively, proportionately, efficiently and economically having regard to the— (a) nature and seriousness of any actual or potential risk to persons referred to in subsection (1); (b) likelihood of that risk materialising; (c) steps reasonably available to prevent or mitigate that risk; (d) need to avoid imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on persons carrying on activities governed by this Act.” Enforcement 3 After section 19C, insert— “19D Enforcement notices (1) Where the Authority is satisfied that a person has failed, or is failing, as described in section 18(2) (revocation of licence), the Authority may give the person a written notice (an “enforcement notice”) which requires the person to— (a) take steps specified in the notice, or (b) refrain from taking steps specified in the notice, or both (see also section 19E). (2) An enforcement notice specified under subsection (1) may only impose requirements which the Authority considers appropriate having regard to the failure (whether or not for the purpose of remedying the failure). 19E Enforcement notices: supplementary (1) An enforcement notice must— (a) state what the person has failed or is failing to do, and (b) give the Authority’s reasons for reaching that opinion. (2) In deciding whether to provide an enforcement notice specified under section 19D(1), the Authority must consider whether the failure has caused, or is likely to cause, any person damage or distress. (3) An enforcement notice may specify the time or times at which, or period or periods within which, a requirement imposed by the notice must be complied with, subject to the restrictions in subsections (5) to (7). (4) An enforcement notice must provide information about the— (a) consequences of failure to comply with it, and (b) rights under sections 21 (appeal on a point of law). (5) An enforcement notice must not specify a time for compliance with a requirement in the notice which falls before the end of the period within which an appeal can be brought against the notice. (6) If an appeal is brought against an enforcement notice, a requirement in the notice need not be complied with pending the determination or withdrawal of the appeal. (7) If an enforcement notice— (a) states that, in the Authority’s opinion, it is necessary for a requirement to be complied with urgently, and (b) gives the Authority’s reasons for reaching that opinion, subsections (5) and (6) do not apply but the notice must not require the requirement to be complied with before the end of the period of 24 hours beginning when the notice is given. (8) In this section, “specified” means specified in an enforcement notice. 19F Enforcement notices: cancellation and variation (1) The Authority may cancel or vary an enforcement notice by giving written notice to the person to whom it was given. (2) A person to whom an enforcement notice is given may apply in writing to the Authority for the cancellation or variation of the notice. (3) An application under subsection (2) may be made only— (a) after the end of the period within which an appeal can be brought against the notice, and (b) on the ground that, by reason of a change of circumstances, one or more of the provisions of that notice need not be complied with in order to remedy the failure identified in the notice.” “Penalties 19G Penalty notices (1) If the Authority is satisfied that a person has— (a) failed or is failing as described in section 19D(1) (enforcement notices), or (b) failed to comply with an enforcement notice, the Authority may, by written notice (a “penalty notice”), require the person to pay the Authority an amount in sterling specified in the notice. (2) When deciding whether to give a penalty notice to a person and determining the amount of the penalty, the Authority must have regard to the following, so far as relevant to the extent that the notice concerns another matter, matters listed in subsection (3). (3) Matters which the Authority must have regard to in issuing a penalty notice include— (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the failure; (b) the intentional or negligent character of the failure; (c) any action taken by the person to mitigate the damage or distress suffered by persons; (d) any relevant previous failures by the person; (e) the degree of co-operation with the Authority, in order to remedy the failure and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the failure; (f) the categories of the failure in regards to licensable activities; (g) the manner in which the infringement became known to the Authority, including whether, and if so to what extent, the person notified the Authority of the failure; (h) the extent to which the person has complied with previous enforcement notices or penalty notices; (i) adherence to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms; (j) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the case, including financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, as a result of the failure (whether directly or indirectly); (k) whether the penalty would be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. (4) Schedule 4AZA makes further provision about penalty notices, including provision requiring the Authority to give a notice of intent to impose a penalty and provision about payment, variation, cancellation and enforcement. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations— (a) confer power on the Authority to give a penalty notice in respect of other failures to comply with the requirements of licensable activities, and (b) provide for the maximum penalty that may be imposed in relation to such failures to be either the standard maximum amount or the higher maximum amount. (6) Regulations under this section may— (a) make provision about the giving of penalty notices in respect of the failure, and (b) amend this section and section 19H (maximum amount of penalty). (7) In this section, “higher maximum amount” and “standard maximum amount” have the same meaning as in section 19H. 19H Maximum amount of penalty (1) In relation to a failure to comply with an enforcement notice, the maximum amount of the penalty that may be imposed by a penalty notice is the higher maximum amount. (2) In relation to an infringement of a provision of this Act where subsection (1) does not apply the maximum amount of the penalty that may be imposed by a penalty notice is the standard maximum amount. (3) The “higher maximum amount” is— (a) in the case of an undertaking, £17,500,000 or 4% of the undertaking's total annual worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, or (b) in any other case, £17,500,000. (4) The “standard maximum amount” is— (a) in the case of an undertaking, £8,700,000 or 2% of the undertaking's total annual worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, or (b) in any other case, £8,700,000. (5) The Secretary of State may by regulations— (a) provide that a person of a description specified in the regulations is or is not an undertaking, and (b) make provision about how an undertaking’s turnover is to be determined. (6) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that a period is or is not a financial year.” 4 Before section 20 insert— “Appeals etc” 5 In section 20 (right to reconsideration of licensing decisions), in subsections (1), (2) and (4), for “require” substitute “request”. 6 For section 21, substitute— “21 Rights of appeal (1) A person aggrieved by a decision on reconsideration in pursuance of a notice under section 20 (right to reconsideration of licensing decisions) may appeal to the court. (2) A person who is given any of the following notices may appeal to the court— (a) an enforcement notice; (b) a penalty notice; (c) a penalty variation notice. 21A Determination of appeals (1) Subsections (2) to (4) apply where a person appeals to the court under section 21(1) or (2). (2) The court may review any determination of fact on which the notice or decision against which the appeal is brought was based. (3) If the court considers— (a) that the notice or decision against which the appeal is brought is not in accordance with the law, or (b) to the extent that the notice or decision involved an exercise of discretion by the Authority, that the Authority ought to have exercised the discretion differently, the court must allow the appeal or substitute another notice or decision which the Authority could have given or made. (4) Otherwise, the court must dismiss the appeal. 21B Applications in respect of urgent notices (1) This section applies where an enforcement notice given to a person contains an urgency statement. (2) The person may apply to the court for either or both of the following— (a) the disapplication of the urgency statement in relation to some or all of the requirements of the notice; (b) a change to the time at which, or the period within which, a requirement of the notice must be complied with. (3) On an application under subsection (2), the court may do any of the following— (a) direct that the notice is to have effect as if it did not contain the urgency statement; (b) direct that the inclusion of the urgency statement is not to have effect in relation to a requirement of the notice; (c) vary the notice by changing the time at which, or the period within which, a requirement of the notice must be complied with; (d) vary the notice by making other changes required to give effect to a direction under paragraph (a) or (b) or in consequence of a variation under paragraph (c). (4) The decision of the court on an application under this section is final. (5) In this section, “urgency statement” means a statement under section 19E(7)(a). 21C Jurisdiction (1) The jurisdiction conferred on a court by section 21 (rights of appeal) is exercisable— (a) in England and Wales, by the High Court or the county court, (b) in Scotland, by the Court of Session or the sheriff, (c) in Northern Ireland, by the High Court or a county court, subject to subsection (2). (2) The jurisdiction conferred on a court by section 21B (applications in respect of urgent notices) is exercisable only by the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.” 7 In section 45(4A) (regulations), insert at the appropriate place— “sections 19G (penalty notices) and 19H (maximum amount of penalty);”. 8 After Schedule 3A insert— “SCHEDULE 3AZA Section 19G PENALTIES Meaning of “penalty” 1 In this Schedule, “penalty” means a penalty imposed by a penalty notice. Notice of intent to impose penalty 2 Before giving a person a penalty notice, the Authority must, by written notice (a “notice of intent”) inform the person that the Authority intends to give a penalty notice. Contents of notice of intent 3 (1) A notice of intent must contain the following information— (a) the name and address of the person to whom the Authority proposes to give a penalty notice; (b) the reasons why the Authority proposes to give a penalty notice (see sub-paragraph (2)); (c) an indication of the amount of the penalty the Authority proposes to impose, including any aggravating or mitigating factors that the Authority proposes to take into account. (2) The information required under sub-paragraph (1)(b) includes— (a) a description of the circumstances of the failure, and (b) the nature, gravity and duration of the failure. (3) A notice of intent must also— (a) state that the person may make written representations about the Authority’s intention to give a penalty notice, and (b) specify the period within which such representations may be made. (4) The period specified for making written representations must be a period of not less than 21 days beginning when the notice of intent is given. (5) If the Authority considers that it is appropriate for the person to have an opportunity to make oral representations about the Authority’s intention to give a penalty notice, the notice of intent must also— (a) state that the person may make such representations, and (b) specify the arrangements for making such representations and the time at which, or the period within which, they may be made. Giving a penalty notice 4 (1) This paragraph applies where the Authority gives a notice of intent to a person. (2) Within the period of six months beginning when the notice is given, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, the Authority must give to the person— (a) a penalty notice, or (b) written notice that the Authority has decided not to give a penalty notice to the person. (3) The Authority may not give a penalty notice to the person before a time, or before the end of a period, specified in the notice of intent for making oral or written representations. (4) When deciding whether to give a penalty notice to the person and determining the amount of the penalty, the Authority must consider any oral or written representations made by the person in accordance with the notice of intent. Contents of a penalty notice 5 (1) A penalty notice must contain the following information— (a) the name and address of the person to whom it is addressed; (b) details of the notice of intent given to the person; (c) whether the Authority received oral or written representations in accordance with the notice of intent; (d) the reasons why the Authority proposes to impose the penalty (see sub-paragraph (2)); (e) the reasons for the amount of the penalty, including any aggravating or mitigating factors that the Authority has taken into account; (f) details of how the penalty is to be paid; (g) details of the rights of appeal under section 21; (h) details of the Authority’s enforcement powers under this Schedule. (2) The information required under sub-paragraph (1)(d) includes— (a) a description of the circumstances of the failure, and (b) the nature, gravity and duration of the failure. Period for payment of penalty 6 (1) A penalty must be paid to the Authority within the period specified in the penalty notice. (2) The period specified must be a period of not less than 28 days beginning when the penalty notice is given. Variation of penalty 7 (1) The Authority may vary a penalty notice by giving written notice (a “penalty variation notice”) to the person to whom it was given. (2) A penalty variation notice must specify— (a) the penalty notice concerned, and (b) how it is varied. (3) A penalty variation notice may not— (a) reduce the period for payment of the penalty; (b) increase the amount of the penalty; (c) otherwise vary the penalty notice to the detriment of the person to whom it was given. (4) If— (a) a penalty variation notice reduces the amount of the penalty, and (b) when that notice is given, an amount has already been paid that exceeds the amount of the reduced penalty, the Authority must repay the excess. Cancellation of penalty 8 (1) The Authority may cancel a penalty notice by giving written notice to the person to whom it was given. (2) If a penalty notice is cancelled, the Authority— (a) may not take any further action under section 19G or this Schedule in relation to the failure to which that notice relates, and (b) must repay any amount that has been paid in accordance with that notice. Enforcement of payment 9 (1) The Authority must not take action to recover a penalty unless— (a) the period specified in accordance with paragraph 6 has ended, (b) any appeals against the penalty notice have been decided or otherwise ended, (c) if the penalty notice has been varied, any appeals against the penalty variation notice have been decided or otherwise ended, and (d) the period for the person to whom the penalty notice was given to appeal against the penalty, and any variation of it, has ended. (2) In England and Wales, a penalty is recoverable— (a) if the county court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court; (b) if the High Court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court. (3) In Scotland, a penalty may be enforced in the same manner as an extract registered decree arbitral bearing a warrant for execution issued by the sheriff court of any sheriffdom in Scotland. (4) In Northern Ireland, a penalty is recoverable— (a) if a county court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court; (b) if the High Court so orders, as if it were payable under an order of that court.” 9 (1) Schedule 3B is amended in accordance with this paragraph. (2) In paragraph 2, after sub-paragraph (1) insert— “(1A) If requested to do so by the Secretary of State, the Authority must arrange for a duly authorised person to inspect any of the premises mentioned in sub-paragraph (3). (1B) The Authority may arrange for a duly authorised person to inspect any of the premises referred to in sub-paragraph (3) in circumstances where it is not required to do so by sub-paragraph (1) or (1A).” (3) After paragraph 2 insert— “Considerations relating to inspection frequency 2A (1) In determining the frequency, timing and scope of inspections, the Authority must have regard to the risks associated with the activities authorised by the licence. (2) The matters to which the Authority must have regard include— (a) the nature and seriousness of any incident or suspected breach of a licence condition; (b) complaints or concerns received from patients, donors, persons born as a result of treatment, or staff; (c) the history of compliance by the licence holder; (d) the adequacy of action taken in response to previous inspection findings; (e) the risks to the health, safety or welfare of persons receiving or providing treatment, and to the security and integrity of gametes and embryos. (3) The Authority must maintain and periodically review a database for assessing the risks referred to in this paragraph. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision about the contents and information standards of the database.” (4) After paragraph 8 insert— “Action following an inspection” (5) In paragraph 9 for sub-paragraph (5), substitute— “(5) The Authority must give a copy of the report or information to— (a) the person requesting it, unless the Authority considers that it would be inappropriate to do so in the particular circumstances of the case, and (b) the Secretary of State. (6) The Authority must include in its annual report information about the exercise of its inspection and enforcement functions. (7) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision about the contents of reports under this paragraph.” (6) After paragraph 9 insert— “9A (1) Where an inspection identifies a material deficiency in the operation of licensed activities, the Authority must determine what further action is necessary and proportionate. (2) The Authority may require the licence holder to submit and implement a corrective action plan within a specified period. (3) A corrective action plan must specify— (a) he deficiency to be addressed; (b) the steps to be taken to address it; (c) the person responsible for each step; (d) the date by which each step to be complied. (e) any other condition as may be specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (4) A corrective action plan must be sent to the Authority by such period as the Authority may specify. (5) After receiving the corrective action plan, the Authority must within 28 days consider whether a further inspection is necessary under paragraph 2 to determine whether the deficiency has been remedied. 9B The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision for the contents of an inspection report.” 10 In section 7 (reports to the Secretary of State), after subsection (2), insert— “(2A) A report prepared under this section must include information about— (a) inspections carried out by the Authority, (b) a corrective action plan in place under paragraph 9A of Schedule 3B, and (c) the improvements made to remedy any deficiencies in relation to such corrective action plan.” Complaints 11 After section 8D, insert— “8DA Complaints relating to licensed activities (1) The Authority must establish and maintain procedures for receiving, assessing and investigating complaints relating to activities governed by this Act. (2) The Authority must investigate a complaint where it has reasonable grounds to suspect— (a) a serious breach of a requirement imposed by or under this Act; (b) a material failure to comply with a licence condition; (c) conduct presenting a significant risk to the health, safety or welfare of a person; (d) a systemic failure affecting patients, donors or other persons materially affected by activities governed by this Act. (3) The Authority must, as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving a complaint, determine whether any of the circumstances in subsection (2) apply. (4) Where the Authority decides not to investigate a complaint, it must give the complainant a statement of reasons for that decision. (5) Where the Authority investigates a complaint, it must— (a) conduct the investigation as soon as reasonably practicable; (b) keep the complainant reasonably informed of the progress of the investigation; (c) notify the complainant of the outcome; (d) give reasons for its findings and any regulatory action taken, subject to any lawful restriction on disclosure. (6) The Authority may decline to investigate, or may suspend an investigation, where it considers that doing so is necessary and proportionate having regard to— (a) the availability of a more appropriate procedure for determining the matter; (b) ongoing civil or criminal proceedings; (c) the vexatious or excessive use of the complaints procedure. (7) The Authority must give a statement of reasons for a decision under subsection (6).” Reporting in relation to licensable activities 12 (1) Section 17 (the person responsible) is amended in accordance with this paragraph. (2) In subsection (1)(g), at end insert “; and of any prescribed near miss which indicates a material risk to the health, safety or welfare of a person or to the security or integrity of gametes or embryos.” (3) After subsection (2) insert— “(2A) In subsection (1)(g) “prescribed” means prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State.”” 13 After section 31B, insert— “31C Reporting and investigation of serious adverse events (1) The Authority must issue a code of practice establishing requirements governing the notification, recording and investigation of serious adverse events, serious adverse reactions and prescribed near misses arising in connection with licensable activities. (2) The requirements must include provision about— (a) the circumstances in which an incident or near miss must be notified to the Authority; (b) the period within which notification must be given; (c) the information to be included in a notification; (d) the investigation and analysis of the causes of an incident or near miss; (e) the identification and implementation of measures to prevent recurrence; (f) the preservation of relevant records and electronic audit trails. (3) The Authority must monitor notifications received under this section for the purpose of identifying recurring incidents, systemic failures and emerging risks. (4) The Authority must publish information about significant trends identified under subsection (3), subject to the protection of personal data and confidential information. (5) Requirements under this section must be proportionate to the seriousness and nature of the incident or near miss. (6) The Authority may revise or revoke a code issued under this section. (7) The Authority must send a copy of the code to the Secretary of State. (8) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the code before each House of Parliament.” 14 In section 12 (general conditions), in subsection (1), after paragraph (g), insert— “(h) that the responsible person will comply with any requirements of a code of practice issued under section 31C.” Continuity plans 15 In Schedule 2, after paragraph 4, insert— “Continuity plans 4A (1) The Authority must ensure that the conditions of a licence authorising the storage of gametes or embryos require the licence holder to maintain a continuity plan. (2) A continuity plan must make provision for the safe and lawful management, transfer or disposal of gametes and embryos where— (a) the licence expires or is revoked; (b) the licence holder ceases to carry on the licensed activities; (c) the licence holder becomes unable to carry on those activities safely; (d) the Authority determines that urgent arrangements are necessary to protect persons or stored gametes or embryos. (3) A continuity plan must also include provision for— (a) the identification of an appropriately licensed facility to which storage activities may be transferred; (b) the preservation and transfer of records, consent documentation and information necessary to maintain traceability; (c) the notification of affected persons, so far as reasonably practicable; (d) the maintenance of appropriate storage conditions pending transfer or other lawful disposition; (e) the allocation of responsibility for implementing the plan. (4) The Authority must assess the adequacy of a continuity plan when considering an application for a licence or its renewal and may require the plan to be revised. (5) The Authority may require a licence holder to implement a continuity plan, in whole or in part, where it considers that this is necessary to protect the health, safety or welfare of persons or to secure the safe and lawful management of stored gametes or embryos. (6) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision in relation to the contents or requirements of continuity plans.””
After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause— “Reusing medication in care homes and hospices (1) If a resident in a care home or hospice has been prescribed medication and that resident no longer needs that medication, the medication can be reused for the symptom control or treatment of another patient, providing that— (a) the medicine is suitable for reuse; (b) the medicine is in an unopened pack or blister that has not been tampered with; (c) the medicine is in date; (d) the medicine has been stored appropriately, including refrigeration if required; (e) the medicine is a licensed medicine that has been prescribed by a registered healthcare professional with prescribing rights; (f) the medicine is being administered on the advice of the prescriber with a valid written prescription; (g) the medicine has been stored in a locked cupboard; (h) consent has been given by the patient for whom the medicine was originally prescribed, or the next of kin if the patient has died; (i) the patient to whom the medication is now to be given is informed that a returned medicine is being used. (2) When the medicine is a controlled drug, it must be entered as a reused medication in the controlled drugs register. (3) All such medication must be entered in a “reused medication register”, recording the— (a) date; (b) name of the original owner; (c) details of the medicine; (d) generic name of the medicine; (e) strength of the medicine; (f) formulation of the medicine; (g) expiry date of the medicine; (h) quantity of the medicine. (4) When a controlled drug is reused, the controlled drug reused register must be updated to record the— (a) date; (b) patient’s name; (c) dose and quantity of the medicine; (d) reason for reusing. (5) All records must be available for all inspecting bodies. (6) Any clinical adverse effects must be recorded using the yellow card scheme, via national reporting and learning systems, and to the Integrated Commissioning Board.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) amends the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 to make provision about the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “NHS-funded in vitro fertilisation (1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations make arrangements for the standardised provision of NHS-funded in vitro fertilisation (IVF). (2) Provision under this section must, in accordance with any existing NICE guidelines, set requirements for all integrated care boards in England relating to NHS-funded IVF. (3) Requirements under subsection (2) must include— (a) standardisation of the minimum number of rounds of IVF available to one individual, and (b) standardisation of the maximum and minimum age at which an individual can access IVF.”
Clause 87, page 65, line 11, at the end insert— “(ga) section (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) and Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990);”
Clause 88, page 65, line 25, at the end insert— “(c) section (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) and Schedule (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) (Amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990).”
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— “Duty as to a smoke-free England In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert— “1CD Duty as to a smoke-free England (1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must act with a view to England becoming smoke-free as defined in section 7(1) of the Health Act 2006 (offence of smoking in smoke-free place). (2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which the Health Act 2026 is passed, publish a roadmap setting out how the health service will contribute to England becoming smoke-free, including interim targets and the stop smoking services to be commissioned by integrated care boards. (3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on progress against the roadmap.””
Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert— “(2B) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, the responsible local authority and each of its partner integrated care boards must— (a) consider the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment for children of all ages in the authority’s area, and in particular for children aged 0 to 5, and (b) where the assessment of relevant needs identifies needs relating to those effects or risks, set out in the plan how those needs are to be met. (2C) Guidance issued under subsection (4) must include guidance on how authorities should discharge their duties under subsection (2B), including how to involve health visitors, school nurses and family hubs. (2D) In subsection (2B)— “children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools; “effects on health and development” includes effects on— (a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development, (b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight, (c) eyesight, and (d) mental health and wellbeing; “risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Children’s digital environment: guidance and training for health professionals in England (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish guidance for health professionals on the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment. (2) The guidance must apply to children of all ages and must in particular address children aged 0 to 5. (3) The guidance must draw on advice from health professionals, researchers and academics, must be consistent with any guidance for parents and carers on screen use published by the Secretary of State, and must address— (a) the effects of children’s digital environment on health and development at different ages, including for children with special educational needs or disabilities, (b) recommended limits on screen time, screen-free times and places to promote children’s health, (c) the effect of parents’ and carers’ own use of devices on children’s health, and (d) how to raise these matters with children, parents and carers in a supportive, non-judgemental way, and where to refer or signpost them for further support. (4) The Secretary of State must exercise functions under section 1F of the National Health Service Act 2006 (duty as to education and training) with a view to ensuring that education and training on the guidance is available to health professionals who work with children and their families, including health visitors, general practitioners, practice nurses, midwives, school nurses, speech and language therapists, community paediatricians, optometrists and staff of family hubs. (5) Before publishing or revising the guidance, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including relevant professional bodies and royal colleges. (6) The Secretary of State must review the guidance at least every three years. (7) The Secretary of State must, within two years of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a report on the availability and uptake of the education and training under subsection (4). (8) In this section— “children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools; “effects on health and development” includes effects on— (a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development, (b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight, (c) eyesight, and (d) mental health and wellbeing; “risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Children’s digital environment: universal health reviews in England (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, ensure that the Healthy Child Programme guidance, and any successor to it, includes provision on the effects on health and development, and the risks of harm, of children’s digital environment. (2) The guidance must provide that, as part of the universal health and development reviews offered to children aged 0 to 5 and their parents and carers, health professionals offer— (a) information on guidance for parents and carers on screen use and online safety published by the Secretary of State; (b) an opportunity to discuss— (i) the child’s use of screens and digital technology, (ii) parents’ and carers’ own use of devices, (iii) screen-free routines, and (iv) the risks of harm to the child’s health and development of their digital environment; (c) where appropriate, further support or signposting. (3) The guidance must make provision of a similar kind, appropriate to their age, for the health and development contacts offered to school-age children under the Healthy Child Programme. (4) The Secretary of State must ensure that information on the matters in subsection (2)(b) is included in the personal child health record, in whatever form it is provided. (5) In this section— “children’s digital environment” means the devices, services, content and platforms with which children interact, including screens, online services, social media, games, messaging services and artificial intelligence tools; “effects on health and development” includes effects on— (a) language, cognitive, and social and emotional development, (b) sleep, physical activity and healthy weight, (c) eyesight, and (d) mental health and wellbeing; “risks of harm” means risks of harm to children’s health and development arising from harmful or age-inappropriate online content, online contact with adults or other children, online conduct and online advertising.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Report on dementia care (1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on— (a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia; (b) the provision of social care in relation to dementia. (2) A report under subsection (1) must have regard to— (a) any targets or standards set out in any national plan, guidance or framework relating to dementia services, and (b) any other information the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (3) A report under subsection (1) must include— (a) an assessment of variation in dementia services and outcomes between integrated care board areas, (b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care, (c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers of dementia patients, (d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services, (e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care, (f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and (g) dementia research activity in the NHS.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Review of continued professional development for nurses and midwives (1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must carry out a review of continued professional development for nurses and midwives. (2) The review must in particular assess— (a) the level of funding available for continued professional development for nurses and midwives, and (b) the protected time available to nurses and midwives for continued professional development. (3) The Secretary of State must publish a report of the findings of the review.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Oversight of funeral service provider premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains (1) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a body corporate, or confer functions on an existing public authority (“the regulator”), to provide oversight of the premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains by funeral service providers in England. (2) The purpose of the regulator is to ensure that the activities undertaken under subsection (1) are consistent with the protection of public health. (3) The regulator is independent in the exercise of its functions and is not to be regarded as a servant or agent of the Crown. (4) Regulations under this section may, in particular, make provision for— (a) a scheme for the registration of funeral service providers, (b) the inspection of premises, vehicles and other facilities used by registered providers for the storage, preparation, care or transportation of deceased persons, or from which funeral services are arranged or conducted, (c) the publication and enforcement of a code of practice for the funeral services sector, and (d) the imposition of sanctions, including suspension or removal from the register, for breach of that code. (5) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult— (a) providers of funeral services, (b) such persons representing the interests of bereaved people as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and (c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (6) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Remit of the Human Tissue Authority (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by order under section 14(4) of the Human Tissue Act 2004, amend the remit of the Human Tissue Authority to include the regulation of funeral directors, private mortuaries, direct cremation services and other organisations which transport or hold the bodies of deceased persons for the purposes of ensuring that the carrying out of their functions is consistent with the protection of public health. (2) The Authority must establish and maintain a register of the bodies subject to its oversight under subsection (1). (3) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument make further provision regarding the establishment and operation of the register under subsection (2). (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (3) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 172A
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Guidance on anonymisation and pseudonymisation of patient information Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Information Commission must publish guidance applicable to health services in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland on the anonymisation and pseudonymisation of patient information.”
None 183A
Baroness Coffey (Con)Clause 62, page 45, leave out lines 2 to 10 and insert— “Omit section 298 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012.”
None 183B
Baroness Coffey (Con)Clause 62, page 45, line 10, at end insert— “(3) All such advice or assistance is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 with no exemptions. (4) A register of advice or assistance provided must be published annually within three months of the end of each calendar year. (5) The register of advice under subsection (4) must also include the amount charged to the recipient of such advice or assistance.”
None 279A
Lord Austin of Dudley (None)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Procurement objectives: medical devices, consumables and services (1) The Secretary of State must lay before each House of Parliament an annual report on the extent to which procurement by the NHS and the social care sector in England of medical devices, consumables and services has adhered to the objectives set out in section 12(1) of the Procurement Act 2023 (covered procurement: objectives). (2) The report under subsection (1) must be limited to the objectives specified in section 12(1) of the Procurement Act 2023 and must not report on any procurement objective not provided for in that section. (3) Nothing in this section applies to a procurement contract or framework agreement to which the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011/1848), Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/102), Concession Contract Regulations 2016 (S.I. 2016/273) or Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 (S.I. 2016/274) continue to apply under the Procurement Act 2023 (Commencement No. 3 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/716).”
None 279B
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Specialist palliative care (1) Each integrated care board must commission sufficient specialist palliative care services to meet the needs of their population. (2) Such services specified in subsection (1) must include the provision of access to— (a) specialist palliative care support, working with local clinical teams, in all relevant settings, including private homes, care homes, hospitals, hospices and other community settings, (b) specialist level in-patient palliative care beds when required, including admission on an urgent basis, (c) specialist palliative care advice, available at all times, to support health and social care professionals who are providing care to the person and their family, to include face to face specialist palliative care review between 9 am and 5 pm on each day of the week, (d) support to ensure the appropriate workforce, equipment and medication is available to deliver specialist palliative care, (e) a single point of contact, available for people with palliative and end of life care in the community, for advice, access to equipment and to rapid response nursing, (f) appropriate systems to share information about the person’s needs with all professionals involved in their care, provided they give consent for this, (g) support to ensure patients are able to have open conversations about their personal needs and concerns, and that these are documented in the single patient record to the extent that the patient desires, (h) support for the education and training of the health and social care workforce regarding palliative care, (i) support to enable staff to participate in relevant research and to disseminate evidence-based innovations in palliative care, and (j) agreed outcomes data for national level benchmarking.”
Opposition Amendment 279C
Lord Blencathra (Con) - Shadow Minister (Energy Security and Net Zero)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “De-registration of doctors and health care professionals found to have expressed antisemitic behaviour or speech (1) The Secretary of State must make regulations made by statutory instrument requiring a statutory regulator of a health or care profession to immediately remove from its register any person found to have expressed antisemitic behaviour or speech. (2) Regulations under subsection (1) must provide that removal from the register is the mandatory sanction and may not be replaced by a lesser sanction. (3) In this section, “antisemitic behaviour or speech” means behaviour or speech which expresses a certain perception of Jews, which may be hatred toward Jews, and which is directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals or their property or Jewish community institutions and religious facilities, including but not limited to— (a) calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion, (b) making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective, such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions, (c) accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews, (d) denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of Nazi Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust), (e) accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a State, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust, (f) using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis, (g) using derogatory terms for Jewish people (such as “kike” or “yid”), (h) using stereotypical and negative physical depictions or descriptions or character traits for Jewish people, such as references to wealth or avarice or, in the political arena, equating Jews with capitalists or the ruling class, or (i) holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 279D
Baroness Griffin of Princethorpe (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Community equipment services: national data collection and reporting (1) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to ensure that consistent national information is collected and published in relation to the assessment for and supply of community equipment services in England. (2) The information collected under subsection (1) must include— (a) the number of people assessed as requiring community equipment, (b) waiting times for assessment for and supply of community equipment, (c) the number of people awaiting community equipment, and (d) the number of people receiving community equipment. (3) The information must, so far as reasonably practicable, distinguish between— (a) provision for adults and children, (b) different local authority areas, and (c) referrals originating from hospital and community settings. (4) The Secretary of State must ensure that information collected under this section includes community equipment services commissioned or arranged by NHS bodies and local authorities, including through joint arrangements. (5) The Secretary of State must publish the information collected under this section at least annually. (6) For the purposes of this section, “community equipment services” means the assessment for and supply of equipment, aids or appliances to support a person's independence, safety, care or daily living at home or in the community but does not include specialist NHS wheelchair services.”
None 279E
Baroness Griffin of Princethorpe (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Community equipment services: annual report to Parliament (1) The Secretary of State must lay before both Houses of Parliament an annual report on the provision of community equipment services in England. (2) The report must include— (a) available information on community equipment provision and waiting times, (b) variation in provision and waiting times between local areas, (c) differences in provision for adults and children, (d) gaps in the national information available on community equipment services, and (e) steps taken or proposed to improve national monitoring and accountability for community equipment services. (3) The report must cover community equipment services commissioned or arranged by NHS bodies and local authorities, including through joint arrangements. (4) For the purposes of this section, “community equipment services” means the assessment for and supply of equipment, aids or appliances to support a person's independence, safety, care or daily living at home or in the community but does not include specialist NHS wheelchair services.”
Opposition Amendment 118
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause—
“Primary care investment standard
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards.
(2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year.
(3) Regulations under this section may make provision about—
(a) the description of services that constitute “primary care services” for the purposes of this section;
(b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced;
(c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be may unless a draft has been approved by resolution of both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to establish, by regulations, a primary care investment standard requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on primary care services at least in line with the growth in their total programme funding, with such regulations subject to the affirmative procedure.
None 161
Lord Bishop of Leicester (Bshp)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Retention of NHS number on following adoption
(1) The Secretary of State must secure ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person’s NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order.
(2) The Secretary of State must secure ensure that a person’s health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made.
(3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to—
(a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and
(b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent.
(4) In this section—
“adoption order” has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002;
“health record” has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018;
“NHS number” has the same meaning as “consistent identifier” in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012.”
Opposition Amendment 197
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 26 Oct 2026After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Healthwatch funding
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, bring forward a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and Local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
(2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding in line with 2026/2027 inflation rates.”
This new clause would ensure that Healthwatch England and Local Healthwatch organisations are funded to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
None 206
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Fracture prevention services: implementation plan and reporting
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament an implementation plan for securing universal access in England by 2030 to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures.
(2) The implementation plan must include—
(a) a baseline assessment of current access to, and quality of, such services in each integrated care board area,
(b) the minimum standards expected of such services,
(c) measurable annual milestones towards universal access by 2030, including milestones relating to the identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture,
(d) the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to reduce unwarranted variation in access to, and quality of, such services, and
(e) the outcomes by reference to which the effectiveness of implementation will be assessed, including the incidence of further fragility fractures and hip fractures.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the publication of the implementation plan under subsection (1), and at intervals of no more than 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report setting out—
(a) progress against the milestones in the implementation plan,
(b) changes in access to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures, and
(c) the number and proportion of eligible people identified, assessed, treated and followed up through such services, including variation between integrated care board areas.
(4) In this section, “services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures” means services which provide for the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, including services commonly known as fracture liaison services.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an implementation plan for securing universal access in England by 2030 to services which systematically identify, assess, treat and follow up people who have sustained a fragility fracture, including fracture liaison services, and to report annually to Parliament on progress.
None 208
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Standards of care for NHS transplant patients’ services
(1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review on the standards of NHS care for transplant patients.
(2) The review under subsection (1) may cover the following matters—
(a) analysis of the comparative performance, outcomes, waiting times and organ utilisation, including variation between transplant centres and international comparisons in relation to lung transplants; hearts transplants; kidney transplants liver transplants and other appropriate transplants;
(b) analysis of workforce requirements and funding for 24/7 on call teams and centres providing transplant services;
(c) such other matters as may be specified by the Secretary of State.
(3) The review under subsection (1) must be taken in collaboration with patients, and families of patients together with practising clinicians in transplant services.
(4) The review under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to undertake a review of NHS transplantation services.
None 214
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“5A Health and care partners
(1) After section 242A National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“242B Involvement of health and care partners
(1) A service user has a right to personal contact, without physical barriers or time limits, including contact in private, and to be accompanied in person by at least one health and care partner.
(2) Each health and care provider must make arrangements, as respects health or care services for which it is responsible, which secure that users of those services may be accompanied by at least one health and care partner during any period during which health or care services are provided to the service user or the service user is under the care or supervision of the health and care provider.
(3) For the purposes of this section a “health and care partner” is a named person chosen by the service user who provides care and support whether unpaid or paid to the service user.
(4) The following are “health and care providers” for the purposes of this section—
(a) an NHS Trust or NHS Foundation Trust,
(b) an integrated care board,
(c) an English local authority,
(d) a care home in England within the meaning of section 8 (3) Care Act 2014,
(e) a person or company providing health care or care services registered with the Care Quality Commission, or
(f) a person or company who provides care services to another person in return for payment.””
This amendment is aimed at offering all users of health and care services the opportunity to nominate someone close to them as their health and care partner. This would be a purely voluntary role, distinct from the role of visitor. The access of the health and care partner would be protected and their opinion respected when health and care decisions are being made.
None 173
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 57, page 42, line 9, after “the” insert “physical access to the individual,”
This amendment, and another in the name of Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, seeks to ensure that people who are asked to help with discussion and decision-making during someone’s care have direct personal access to that individual.
None 174
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 57, page 42, line 17, at end insert—
“(fc) the importance of the individual having physical access to others including health and care partners;”.”
This amendment, and another in the name of Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, seeks to ensure that people who are asked to help with discussion and decision-making during someone’s care have direct personal access to that individual.
None 18
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Health inequalities: strategy and annual report
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a cross-government strategy for reducing health inequalities in England, setting out the steps to be taken by the Secretary of State and other Ministers of the Crown.
(2) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each calendar year, a report on progress in reducing health inequalities in England and in implementing the strategy.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to produce a cross-government health inequalities strategy and an annual progress report to Parliament.
None 71
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause—
“Prescribed specialised services
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument specify, based on clearly defined criteria, the services provided as part of the health service in England which are to be treated as specialised services (“prescribed specialised services”), and must publish the full list of such services.
(2) Prescribed specialised services include both—
(a) services for which commissioning responsibility is exercised by the Secretary of State, and
(b) services for which commissioning responsibility is exercised by one or more integrated care boards.
(3) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to ensure that all prescribed specialised services are informed by clinical involvement in the—
(a) planning of the commissioning arrangements;
(b) design of services and arrangements for service delivery;
(c) monitoring of the performance of specialised services.
(4) The Secretary of State is accountable for national oversight of all prescribed specialised services and must exercise functions in relation to those services with a view to securing equitable access for patients across England.
(5) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the performance of all prescribed specialised services.
(6) A report under subsection (5) must include information relating to—
(a) patient outcomes,
(b) access to services,
(c) waiting times,
(d) workforce capacity,
(e) service sustainability,
(f) geographical variation in services,
(g) compliance with national service specifications, and
(h) arrangements for the coordination of specialist, community and neighbourhood care.
(7) A report under subsection (5) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
(8) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require all specialised services, whether commissioned by the Secretary of State or by integrated care boards, to be specified in regulations and make the Secretary of State accountable for national oversight and equitable access across England.
None 90
Lord Foster of Bath (LD)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Integrated care boards: prisons and probation
After section 14Z44 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“14Z44A Duty as to prisons and probation etc
(1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, comply with the conditions of this section.
(2) The first condition is that they have due regard to the need to improve health outcomes for—
(a) people in custody of the Prison Service, and
(b) people under the supervision of the probation service in the community.
(3) The second condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure continuity of care for people—
(a) sentenced to a custodial sentence,
(b) moved between prisons,
(c) moved between areas pursuant to a community sentence imposed by a court,
(d) released from secure custody and remaining under the supervision of the probation service, or
(e) leaving the supervision of the probation service.
(4) The third condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure that people mentioned in subsection (2) have access, in addition to any services commissioned by local authorities, to—
(a) mental health support, including but not limited to acute mental health services and psychiatric treatment,
(b) substance misuse support, including but not limited to opiate and non-opiate and alcohol recovery services,
(c) addiction services, including but not limited to smoking cessation, and gambling disorder services, and
(d) other specialised services determined appropriate by assessment of local community needs or delivered by local providers.
(5) When complying with the conditions set out in this section, an integrated care board must have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
(6) The Secretary of State may issue guidance on specific services which must be commissioned by integrated care boards in order to comply with this section.””
This amendment would require ICBs to have particular regard to improving the provision of healthcare for people in prison, serving community sentences, or under post-release supervision. It would also require that specialist services for these groups be commissioned where needed, and that continuity of care be protected where possible as people move in and out of custody.
None 7
Lord Patel (XB)Clause 4, page 3, line 24, leave out “have regard to the need to”
None 13
Lord Patel (XB)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England in respect of life expectancy or general state of health which are wholly or partly the result of differences in respect of general health determinants.”
None 19
Lord Patel (XB)After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Health inequalities strategy—
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health inequalities strategy.
(2) In preparing the strategy under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) A Minister of the Crown must, in exercising the Minister’s functions, have regard to the strategy.”
None 47
Lord Patel (XB)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty of Secretary of State to obtain appropriate advice
The Secretary of State must obtain advice appropriate for enabling the Secretary of State to discharge effectively the Secretary of State’s functions in relation to the health service from persons who (taken together) have a broad range of professional expertise in—
(a) the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness, and
(b) the protection or improvement of public health.”
This new clause would place on the Secretary of State an equivalent statutory duty to that currently imposed on NHS England by section 13J of the National Health Service Act 2006, requiring appropriate professional advice to be obtained in the discharge of the Secretary of State’s functions.
None 162
Baroness Hollins (XB)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection of confidential psychological therapy records
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument provide for safeguards governing the inclusion of information relating to psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies in the single patient record.
(2) The regulations must provide that detailed narrative records of psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies may not be routinely disclosed through the single patient record to health or social care professionals unless the patient has given explicit and informed consent to the disclosure.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply where disclosure is necessary to address an immediate risk to the life, safety or wellbeing of the patient or another person.
(4) Any disclosure under subsection (3) must be limited to the information reasonably necessary for that purpose, and the reasons for the disclosure must be recorded.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 114
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert—
“(2A) A direction under subsection (1) may relate only to—
(a) conditions subject to which sums are paid to the board under section 223G,
(b) limits on expenditure or resource use by the board,
(c) requirements that sums be used only for specified purposes (including requirements of the kind mentioned in section 223GB), and
(d) the payment or repayment of sums to the Secretary of State,
and may not specify how the board is to exercise its commissioning functions (within the meaning given by section 5A(2)).”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, stops financial directions being used to direct how an ICB commissions services.
None 117
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 49, page 34, line 27, at end insert—
“(2A) Any objectives set under subsection (1) for an integrated care board form part of its ICB outcomes (see section 14Z61), and the Secretary of State must publish them.”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, makes joint financial objectives part of each ICB’s published outcomes.
Baroness Merron gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Schedule 9 be the Ninth Schedule to the Bill.
This leaves out Schedule 9. Schedule 9 transfers the Health Services Safety Investigations Body’s functions to the Care Quality Commission.
None 26
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 6, page 4, line 20, at end insert—
“(5) The Secretary of State must establish a transformational fund, within a year of the date on which the Health Act 2026 is passed, to enable improvements in access to specialist palliative care and its support to generalist services.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to create a dedicated palliative and end of life care transformation fund to support service redesign by scaling proven models of care that help deliver the government’s intended shift from hospital to community care for people at the end of life.
None 66
Baroness Cass (XB)Clause 16, page 12, line 10, at end insert—
“(3) Regulations must impose duties on integrated care boards with respect to waiting times for treatments or other services provided to children which they arrange in the exercise of their commissioning functions.
(4) Regulations under subsection (3) must include provision as to the arrangements integrated care boards must make where a specified treatment or other specified service for a child is not provided within a specified period.
(5) The first regulations under subsection (3) must be made before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 16 of the Health Act 2026 comes into force.
(6) In this section “child” means a person under the age of 18.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to make regulations imposing waiting-time duties on integrated care boards in respect of children including a requirement on integrated care boards to take action where a child does not receive a specified treatment or service within the specified period.
None 99
Lord Londesborough (XB)Clause 25, page 18, line 22, at end insert—
“(4A) Any guidance issued by the Secretary of State under subsection (4) must include provision about—
(a) supporting effective management within primary and neighbourhood care, including through appropriate clinical capability and arrangements for escalation where clinically necessary,
(b) assessing the workforce and service capacity required to implement a neighbourhood health plan,
(c) allocating lead responsibility between partner organisations, and
(d) assessing progress against locally selected indicators using information already collected or published in the exercise of statutory functions.”
This amendment seeks to require guidance on neighbourhood health plans to cover clinical leadership and escalation arrangements in primary and neighbourhood care, assessing the workforce and service capacity needed for delivery, the clear allocation of lead responsibility between partner organisations, and the monitoring of progress using existing statutory data and locally selected indicators.
Opposition Amendment 148
Baroness Barker (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Voluntary Sector)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Single patient record: sexual and reproductive health information
(1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must not require or authorise information relating to the provision of sexual and reproductive health services to a patient to be made available through the system established under those regulations, unless the patient has given explicit consent.
(2) A patient may withdraw consent given under subsection (1) at any time.
(3) In this section “sexual and reproductive health services” includes—
(a) testing for and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections,
(b) contraception, and
(c) the termination of pregnancy.”
This amendment would exclude HIV, sexual health and abortion care information from the single patient record unless the patient gives explicit consent.
Opposition Amendment 163
Baroness Barker (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Voluntary Sector)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to receive sexual health services anonymously
(1) A person seeking testing for, or treatment of, HIV or any other sexually transmitted infection from a sexual health service must not be required, as a condition of receiving that service, to give their name or any other information which identifies them.
(2) Information identifying a person who receives a service under subsection (1) must not be disclosed without that person’s consent, except where necessary to prevent a serious risk of harm to the person or to others.”
This amendment would put on a statutory footing the existing right to use sexual health services anonymously.
None 177
Lord Lansley (Con)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“Cap on care costs
(1) Sections 15 (cap on care costs) and 16 (cap on care costs: annual adjustment) of the Care Act 2014 come into force at the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations under section 15(4) of the Care Act 2014 to take effect no later than 12 months after the entry into force of sections 15 and 16 of the Care Act 2014.”
This amendment would bring into force the cap on care costs which was recommended by the Dilnot Commission in 2011 and passed into law in the Care Act 2014, but which has not been brought into force.
None 178
Lord Lansley (Con)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“Integrated personal health and care budgets
(1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 12DB (inserted by Schedule 12 to this Act) insert—
“12DC Right to an integrated personal health and care budget
(1) This section applies where—
(a) The Secretary of State or an integrated care board (‘the relevant NHS body’) is responsible for arranging the provision to an adult of one or more community-based health services,
(b) the relevant NHS body has identified an amount which is sufficient to secure the provision of those services in accordance with an agreed care plan, and
(c) a local authority is required, or has decided, to meet needs of that adult under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014 and the adult has a personal budget under section 26 of that Act.
(2) The adult, or an authorised representative acting on the adult’s behalf, may request that the amounts available from the relevant NHS body and the local authority be provided as an integrated personal health and care budget.
(3) Where a request is made under subsection (2), the relevant NHS body and the local authority must—
(a) grant the request unless one of the grounds in subsection (8) applies;
(b) prepare, with the adult or authorised representative, a single personalised health and care plan;
(c) identify in that plan—
(i) the adult’s assessed health needs and care and support needs;
(ii) the outcomes which the arrangements are intended to achieve;
(iii) the amount to be provided by the relevant NHS body;
(iv) the amount to be provided by the local authority;
(v) any amount which the adult is required to pay following a financial assessment under the Care Act 2014; and
(vi) the total amount of the integrated personal health and care budget;
(d) designate one of them as the lead body responsible for administering the budget; and
(e) establish a single system for payment, management, monitoring and review of the budget.
(4) An integrated personal health and care budget may be managed by—
(a) a direct payment to the adult or an authorised representative,
(b) a direct payment to a person nominated by the adult or authorised representative,
(c) a managed account administered by a person or body independent of the relevant NHS body and the local authority,
(d) a notional budget administered by the lead body in accordance with the personalised health and care plan, or
(e) a combination of the arrangements in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(5) The relevant NHS body and the local authority must give effect to the adult’s preferred method of management under subsection (4), except to the extent that a ground in subsection (8) applies.
(6) Amounts comprised in an integrated personal health and care budget may be applied to any service, support, item or arrangement specified in the personalised health and care plan where the bodies are satisfied that it will contribute to meeting one or more of the needs or outcomes specified in that plan.
(7) Expenditure under subsection (6) need not be classified exclusively as expenditure on health care or on care and support, but the personalised health and care plan must make provision sufficient to meet all the needs which the relevant NHS body and the local authority are respectively required to meet.
(8) A request, or a preferred method of managing the budget, may be refused only where—
(a) the proposed arrangement would be unlawful,
(b) it would give rise to a material risk to the health, safety or welfare of the adult or another person which cannot reasonably be mitigated,
(c) the adult, authorised representative or nominee would be unable to manage the arrangement safely or effectively notwithstanding any support which could reasonably be provided,
(d) the requested arrangement relates to a service which regulations expressly exclude from integrated personal budgets, or
(e) the proposed expenditure would not contribute to meeting a need or outcome specified in the personalised health and care plan.
(9) Where a request is refused in whole or in part, the relevant NHS body and the local authority must—
(a) give the adult and any authorised representative written reasons,
(b) identify any alternative arrangement which they propose,
(c) inform them of the right to require a review, and
(d) continue to secure the services required to meet the adult’s assessed needs while the review is determined.
(10) A review under subsection (9) must—
(a) be undertaken by a person who was not involved in the original decision,
(b) involve the adult and any authorised representative,
(c) be completed within the prescribed period, and
(d) result in a written decision with reasons.
(11) Nothing in this section—
(a) transfers from the relevant NHS body or the local authority responsibility for any function or duty for which that body is otherwise responsible,
(b) permits a charge to be imposed for any service which must be provided free of charge as part of the health service,
(c) permits an amount payable by the relevant NHS body to be taken into account as resources of the adult for the purposes of a financial assessment under the Care Act 2014,
(d) permits either body to reduce the amount it would otherwise be required to provide solely because the other body is contributing to the integrated budget, or
(e) affects the right of the adult to have services arranged directly instead of receiving or managing a personal budget.
(12) To the extent that an integrated personal health and care budget consists of—
(a) NHS funding, a payment made under this section is to be treated as a direct payment under section 12A;
(b) money payable by a local authority to meet needs under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014, the payment is to be treated as a direct payment under section 31 or 32 of that Act, as appropriate.
(13) In this section “authorised representative” means—
(a) where the adult has capacity to make the relevant decision, a person whom the adult has authorised to act on the adult’s behalf,
(b) a donee of a lasting power of attorney, or a deputy appointed by the Court of Protection, who has authority to make the relevant decision,
(c) a person nominated by the adult before the adult lost capacity to make the relevant decision, or
(d) where there is no person within paragraphs (b) or (c), a suitable person approved jointly by the relevant NHS body and the local authority to act in the adult’s best interests.
(14) An authorised representative may nominate a person or organisation to administer a managed account where the authorised representative does not have authority, or does not wish, personally to receive and manage the money.
(15) In this section “community-based health services” means health services arranged for an adult in the adult’s home or in a community setting, including—
(a) NHS Continuing Healthcare,
(b) community nursing, therapy, rehabilitation and mental-health services,
(c) equipment and other support required to enable the adult to live in the community, and
(d) such other services as may be prescribed.
(16) The Secretary of State must make regulations providing for—
(a) the period within which a request must be determined and implemented,
(b) the calculation and sufficiency of the NHS contribution,
(c) support for adults and authorised representatives in preparing and managing a budget,
(d) monitoring, review, audit and recovery of payments,
(e) resolution of disputes between responsible bodies without interruption to the adult’s care, and
(f) the limited descriptions of service which may be excluded under subsection (8)(d).”
(3) In section 75 of the National Health Service Act 2006, after subsection (3) insert—
“(3A) Regulations under this section must make provision enabling NHS bodies and local authorities to discharge their duties under section 12DC.
(3B) The absence of arrangements under this section does not relieve an NHS body or local authority of a duty imposed by section 12DC.””
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Lansley integrate funding after NHS and Care Act eligibility have been determined. They would give a statutory right to one plan, one total budget and one administrative arrangement, but do not merge the statutory responsibilities of the NHS body and local authority.
None 179
Lord Lansley (Con)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“Consequential amendments to the Care Act 2014
(1) The Care Act 2014 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 25, after subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) Where section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006 applies, the requirements of this section may be satisfied by a single personalised health and care plan prepared under that section.”
(3) For section 26(3) substitute—
“(3) Where section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006 applies, the personal budget must—
(a) specify the amount of NHS money available in the adult’s case,
(b) form part of the integrated personal health and care budget prepared under that section, and
(c) identify separately the amounts provided by the local authority, the relevant NHS body and the adult.
(3A) In any other case, a personal budget may specify other amounts of public money available in the adult’s case, including amounts relating to housing, healthcare or welfare.”
(4) In sections 31 and 32, after subsection (3) insert—
“(3A) Where a direct payment forms part of an integrated personal health and care budget under section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006, the local authority must coordinate the payment, account, conditions and review arrangements with the relevant NHS body and must not require a separate account or administrative process unless this is necessary for the protection of the adult.””
This amendment and another in the name of Lord Lansley integrate funding after NHS and Care Act eligibility have been determined. They would give a statutory right to one plan, one total budget and one administrative arrangement, but do not merge the statutory responsibilities of the NHS body and local authority.
None 200
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Con)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Powers for coroners and medical examiners to review suspected failings in obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care
(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, establish a standard mechanism whereby coroners and medical examiners must review cases of deaths, bought to them by patients, medical staff or other relevant whistleblowers, where there are suspected failings in the provision of obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care.
(2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to review cases using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings or clinical negligence in a health care setting.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to establish a standard mechanism for coroners and medical examiners to review cases involving suspected failings in obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care.
None 204
Baroness Boycott (XB)After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause—
“Infant feeding bottles: materials
(1) A relevant NHS body must, when procuring or supplying infant feeding bottles for use by infants in its care, procure or supply bottles which are not made wholly or partly of plastic.
(2) The duty in subsection (1) does not apply where the responsible clinician considers that the use of a bottle not made of plastic would be contrary to the clinical interests of a particular infant.
(3) A relevant NHS body satisfies the duty in subsection (1) by procuring or supplying bottles the container of which is made of a safe alternative material.
(4) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify a material as a safe alternative material, or remove a material previously so specified, but may only specify a material where satisfied, on the basis of the best available scientific and clinical evidence and applying a precautionary approach, that in normal conditions of use the material does not release into the contents of the bottle—
(a) microplastic particles,
(b) bisphenols or their derivatives,
(c) phthalates or other plasticisers, or
(d) any other substance having endocrine-disrupting properties,
in quantities which may pose a risk to the health of an infant.
(5) In subsection (4), “normal conditions of use” includes sterilisation, the preparation of feed with water at temperatures used in clinical and domestic settings, repeated washing, and the expected service life of the bottle.
(6) The Secretary of State must make the first regulations under subsection (4) within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force.
(7) Before making regulations under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the United Kingdom Health Security Agency,
(b) the Food Standards Agency,
(c) the Health and Safety Executive,
(d) such organisations representing paediatric, neonatal and maternity clinicians as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and
(e) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(8) The Secretary of State must issue guidance to relevant NHS bodies about the discharge of the duty in subsection (1), including guidance on cleaning, sterilisation and safe handling, and a relevant NHS body must have regard to that guidance.
(9) Within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on compliance with the duty in subsection (1), including an estimate of the number of infant feeding bottles procured or supplied by relevant NHS bodies in the reporting period and the materials of which they were made.
(10) In this section—
“infant” means a child under the age of 24 months;
“infant feeding bottle” means the container from which an infant is fed, and does not include the teat, valve or collar;
“relevant NHS body” means—
(a) an integrated care board,
(b) an NHS trust, or
(c) an NHS foundation trust;
“responsible clinician” means the registered medical practitioner or registered nurse with responsibility for the care of the infant”
Opposition Amendment 20
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—
“Urban health equity
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy for reducing health inequalities in urban areas in England.
(2) The strategy must address the effect on health of deprivation, air quality, housing and access to health services.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on progress in implementing the strategy.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to publish a strategy for reducing health inequalities in urban areas and report annually on progress.
Opposition Amendment 59
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause—
“Specialised commissioning: children and young people
(1) Before any decision to delegate, transfer or otherwise devolve responsibility for commissioning specialised services, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the need for age-appropriate specialised services for children and young people,
(b) the need for equitable access to those services across England,
(c) the impact of the decision on the quality, safety, sustainability and clinical effectiveness of those services,
(d) the effect of the small and geographically dispersed population of children and young people requiring those services,
(e) the impact on patients from Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland who use those services in England, and
(f) the benefits of retaining national commissioning or oversight where this supports sufficient patient volumes, clinical expertise, service standards or equitable access.
(2) Before making a decision under subsection (1) that relates to specialised services for children and young people, the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment setting out the likely effect on—
(a) access to services,
(b) clinical outcomes and patient experience,
(c) health inequalities,
(d) clinical expertise and service sustainability,
(e) service integration and continuity of care,
(f) patients, families and carers, and
(g) the quality, consistency and equity of services.
(3) In preparing an impact assessment under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including children and young people who use specialised services, their families and carers, clinicians, and relevant provider and support organisations.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on the provision, accessibility, quality and outcomes of specialised services for children and young people.
(5) In this section—
“children and young people” means persons under the age of 25;
“specialised services” means services commissioned under regulations made under section 3B of the National Health Service Act 2006 (regulation-making power to require Secretary of State to commission services).”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to consider the needs of children and young people before devolving specialised commissioning, publish an impact assessment, and report annually to Parliament.
None 60
Lord Scriven (LD)After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—
“Sight tests: people with learning disabilities
In regulation 3(1) of the Primary Ophthalmic Services Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/1186) (sight tests: eligibility)—
(a) at the end of paragraph (h), omit “or”,
(b) at the end of paragraph (i), for the full stop substitute “; or”, and
(c) after paragraph (i) insert—
“(j) who is eligible for registration as having a learning disability with their GP or is already registered as having a learning disability with their GP.””
This amendment would make people with a learning disability eligible for a free NHS sight test, in the same way as people with diabetes or a family history of glaucoma.
Opposition Amendment 61
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Schedule 1, page 72, line 30, at end insert—
(5)After subsection (2) insert—
(2A)Eligibility for, and the scope of, the sight-testing service mentioned in subsection (2), and the fees payable for it, must be set nationally by the Secretary of State, and an integrated care board may not vary them in its area.””
This amendment would ensure that access to NHS sight tests remains nationally protected and is not subject to local variation once integrated care boards take on commissioning of primary ophthalmic services.
None 62
Lord Scriven (LD)Schedule 1, page 73, line 6, at end insert—
“116C Primary ophthalmic services for people with learning disabilities
The Secretary of State must—
(a) assess, or make arrangements for the assessment of, the need for primary ophthalmic services among people with learning disabilities,
(b) direct integrated care boards to commission primary ophthalmic services to meet those needs, and
(c) monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of those services.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to assess the eye care needs of people with learning disabilities and direct integrated care boards to commission services to meet them.
Opposition Amendment 67
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 16, page 12, line 22, at end insert—
“(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must make provision for enabling people to choose the provider of appropriate non-consultant-led community services, including—
(a) optometry-led monitoring and management of low-risk glaucoma, and
(b) community urgent eye care services.
(4) The Secretary of State must keep under review the services to which regulations under subsection (1) apply, with a view to extending patient choice for care in the community.”
This amendment would extend patient choice to non-consultant-led community services, including optometry-led glaucoma care and community urgent eye care services.
Opposition Amendment 70
Baroness Barker (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Voluntary Sector)After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause—
“Reservation and prioritisation of contracts for the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector
(1) In exercising their commissioning functions, integrated care boards must take reasonable steps to secure the participation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in the provision of services.
(2) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument enable integrated care boards to reserve and prioritise contracts to be delivered by voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations as part of their commissioning process.
(3) Circumstances in which contracts may be appropriate to be reserved and prioritised under subsection (2) include—
(a) services that are, or could be, community-based,
(b) services that are intended to reach populations that are underserved, marginalised, or experiencing health inequalities, or
(c) where voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations are best placed to deliver person-centred or culturally competent care.
(4) In exercising functions under this section, integrated care boards must have regard to—
(a) the need to reduce health inequalities,
(b) the importance of securing equitable access to services across different areas, and
(c) the sustainability of voluntary, community and social enterprise provision.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require integrated care boards to take reasonable steps to secure the participation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in the provision of services through the ICB commissioning process.
Opposition Amendment 23
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause—
“Patient choice: onward referrals by virtual and integrated health services
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument make provision to ensure that a patient who is referred onward by a designated health service body to a provider for elective care or treatment is offered the same choices in respect of that referral as would apply if the referral had been made by a general practitioner, dentist or optometrist.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) must in particular ensure that a designated health service body—
(a) does not maintain a closed list of preferred providers for onward referrals which excludes providers that would otherwise be available to patients under the NHS choice framework,
(b) does not direct a patient to a particular provider for elective care without first offering the patient the opportunity to exercise their right to choice, and
(c) has access to the NHS e-Referral Service, or any successor system, for the purpose of facilitating patient choice in respect of onward referrals.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(4) In this section—
“designated health service body” means—
(a) an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust,
(b) a body designated by the Secretary of State as providing virtual care or triage services to NHS patients in England, or
(c) a body designated by the Secretary of State as an integrated healthcare organisation or organisation of equivalent description;
“onward referral” means a referral made by a designated health service body to another provider for the purposes of the patient receiving further investigation, treatment or care.”
This amendment would ensure that patients referred onward by NHS trusts and virtual or integrated health services have the same choice of provider as those referred by a GP, dentist or optometrist.
Opposition Amendment 82
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 22, page 16, line 19, at end insert—
“(2A) The constitution must also provide for the ordinary members appointed as mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(b) to include at least one member nominated jointly by providers of primary care services in the integrated care board’s area, including providers of primary ophthalmic services, and must set out the process for that nomination.”
This amendment would ensure that primary care, including optometry, is represented on each integrated care board.
None 93
Baroness Young of Old Scone (None)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Quality and outcomes for people living with inflammatory bowel disease
(1) Each integrated care board must monitor and assess variation in the quality of care, access to services and outcomes for people living with inflammatory bowel disease within its area.
(2) In carrying out an assessment under subsection (1), an integrated care board must assess its performance against the national standards and measures established under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease).
(3) For each financial year, an integrated care board must publish a report on its performance against the national standards and measures established under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease), including any unwarranted variation identified within its area and the action taken or proposed to reduce it.
(4) In this section, “inflammatory bowel disease” includes Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and such related conditions as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations made under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease).
(5) The first report under this section must be published within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force, and subsequent reports must be published annually.”
The amendment would require all ICBs to assess and report against the same national framework for inflammatory bowel disease.
None 120
Baroness Noakes (Con)Clause 52, page 36, line 16, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
This amendment together with others in the name of Baroness Noakes probe the extent to which private health and social care falls within the patient record system.
None 121
Baroness Noakes (Con)Clause 52, page 36, line 17, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
This amendment together with others in the name of Baroness Noakes probe the extent to which private health and social care falls within the patient record system.
None 122
Baroness Noakes (Con)Clause 52, page 36, line 18, after "of" insert "publicly funded"
This amendment together with others in the name of Baroness Noakes probe the extent to which private health and social care falls within the patient record system.
Opposition Amendment 129
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert—
“(2A) The regulations must make provision for—
(a) persons providing optometry services to have access to relevant patient information through the system,
(b) the system to be interoperable with the digital systems used by such persons, and
(c) persons providing optometry services to be represented in the governance and implementation of the system.”
This amendment would ensure that optometrists have access to the single patient record, interoperable digital systems and a role in its governance and implementation.
None 130
Baroness Noakes (Con)Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert—
“(2A) The regulations must provide that any patient may opt out of all or any information relating to them being included in the system.”
This amendment allows patients to opt out of being included in the single patient record system.
Opposition Amendment 139
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 52, page 37, line 14, after “condition” insert “, and includes optometry services, including primary ophthalmic services”
This amendment would make explicit that optometry is included within the single patient record framework.
None 140
Baroness Noakes (Con)Clause 52, page 37, line 23, at end insert—
““publicly funded” care includes care which is partly funded out of public funds;”
This amendment together with others in the name of Baroness Noakes probe the extent to which private health and social care falls within the patient record system.
None 149
Lord Markham (Con)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Single patient record: review of data minimisation
(1) Before making regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (single patient record), the Secretary of State must undertake a review of—
(a) the patient information to be provided to or processed through the system established under that section,
(b) the identifiable patient information to be held by suppliers, contractors, partners and service providers whose information or services will be used to establish, populate or operate the system,
(c) whether that identifiable patient information can be anonymised, pseudonymised or processed using a unique identifier before it is disclosed to or processed by those persons,
(d) the periods for which identifiable patient information will be retained by those persons,
(e) whether the establishment of the system will result in unnecessary duplication of identifiable patient information, and
(f) the cybersecurity risks of the unnecessary retention, disclosure or duplication of identifiable patient information.
(2) The review must make recommendations for reducing the amount of identifiable patient information held by persons participating in the system and increasing the use of anonymisation, pseudonymisation and unique identifiers.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report setting out the findings and recommendations of the review.”
This new clause would require a review of data minimisation in relation to the single patient record, including identifiable information held by suppliers, partners, contractors, diagnostic laboratories and other service providers, and whether greater use could be made of anonymisation, pseudonymisation and unique identifiers.
None 252
Baroness Hollins (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS mental health workforce plan
(1) Within 12 months of the publication of the first NHS workforce plan since the 2023 NHS workforce plan, the Secretary of State must publish a follow-up mental health workforce plan.
(2) The plan should include but not be limited to detail on—
(a) how the mental health workforce will be effectively retained and recruited to meet the scale of the mental health demand, including for people with learning disabilities and autistic people;
(b) investment required to achieve the commitments in the plan.
(3) The Secretary of State must produce an annual report to Parliament on the achievements made in delivering the plan.”
The amendment requires the Government to publish a follow-up mental health workforce plan within 12 months of the publication of the next NHS workforce plan.
Opposition Amendment 253
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health and care workforce strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health and care workforce strategy for England.
(2) The strategy must set out—
(a) an assessment of the number of staff, including registered nurses and primary care practitioners, needed to meet current and projected demand for health and care services, and
(b) a funded plan to close any gap between that number and the staff available.
(3) In this section “primary care practitioners” includes general practitioners, dentists, optometrists and pharmacists.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on progress in implementing the strategy.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to assess health and care staffing needs, including for nursing and primary care, publish a funded plan to close any gaps, and report annually to Parliament.
None 254
Baroness Leaman (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England
(1) No regulations may be made under section 88 (commencement) bringing section 1 into force unless the Secretary of State has published, and laid before Parliament, a statement under this section.
(2) A statement under this section must set out—
(a) how each function exercised by NHS England in relation to the assessment, diagnosis, treatment and support of autistic people and people with ADHD will be exercised following the abolition of NHS England, and by which person or body,
(b) how the functions exercised by NHS England in connection with its national programme for people with a learning disability and autistic people will be exercised following that abolition, and by which person or body,
(c) the senior officer of the Department of Health and Social Care with lead responsibility for the matters in paragraphs (a) and (b), and
(d) how the Secretary of State will monitor, and report to Parliament on, waiting times for autism and ADHD assessment.
(3) In this section—
“ADHD” means attention deficit hyperactivity disorder;
“autistic people” includes people with any autism spectrum condition.”
This new clause would prevent NHS England from being abolished until the Government has published who will be responsible for its autism, ADHD and learning disability functions, and how assessment waiting times will be monitored.
None 255
Baroness Leaman (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Autism and ADHD: publication of information and prevalence surveys
(1) The Secretary of State must publish information about the assessment of autism and ADHD in England, including—
(a) the number of people referred for an autism assessment, and the number of people referred for an ADHD assessment, who are waiting for that assessment,
(b) the length of time for which those people have been waiting, and
(c) information disaggregated by integrated care board area, age group and sex.
(2) Information under subsection (1) must be published—
(a) at intervals no longer than those at which equivalent information was published by NHS England immediately before the day on which section 1 comes into force, and
(b) in a form which allows comparison with the information published by NHS England before that day.
(3) The Secretary of State must arrange for surveys to be carried out to estimate the prevalence of autism and ADHD among children and adults in England.
(4) The first survey under subsection (3) must be commissioned within two years of the day on which this Act is passed and further surveys must be commissioned at intervals of not more than five years.
(5) The Secretary of State must publish the results of each survey under subsection (3) and lay a copy before Parliament.
(6) In this section "ADHD" means attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and “autism” includes any autism spectrum condition.”
This new clause would ensure that published statistics on autism and ADHD assessment waiting lists continue, on the same timetable and in comparable form, after NHS England's information functions transfer to the Secretary of State, and would require regular surveys of the prevalence of autism and ADHD.
None 256
Lord Markham (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Treatment at sporting and cultural events
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by regulations made by statutory instrument establish an exception from registration under Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (registration in respect of provision of health or social care) for the provision of treatment of disease, disorder or injury by a listed healthcare professional where—
(a) the treatment is provided to—
(i) an athlete or performer, or
(ii) a person providing essential support to an athlete or performer,
(b) the treatment is provided in connection with preparation for, travel to or from, or participation in a sporting competition, sporting event or cultural performance,
(c) the healthcare professional is registered with the professional regulator relevant to their profession,
(d) the treatment is provided in accordance with relevant quality and clinical governance standards recognised by the Secretary of State, and
(e) the healthcare professional has notified the Care Quality Commission that they intend to operate under the exception.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “athlete” includes—
(a) a professional or elite athlete;
(b) an amateur athlete;
(c) a child or young person participating in sport;
(d) a person participating in a grassroots, community, school or recreational sporting competition or event.
(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must make provision in relation to—
(a) elite and professional competitions and performances,
(b) amateur and non-elite competitions and performances,
(c) grassroots and community sporting events,
(d) school and youth sporting events, and
(e) competitions and events involving disabled athletes or performers.
(4) The standards recognised under subsection (1)(d) must include standards relating to—
(a) safeguarding, including the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults,
(b) clinical governance,
(c) professional competence,
(d) indemnity,
(e) medicines management,
(f) record keeping, and
(g) emergency escalation.
(5) The Care Quality Commission must maintain a register of listed healthcare professionals who have notified it under subsection (1)(e).
(6) Entry in the register under subsection (5)—
(a) does not constitute registration under Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and
(b) may be suspended or removed where the Care Quality Commission is satisfied that the professional no longer meets the conditions in subsection (1).
(7) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) relevant professional regulators,
(c) national governing bodies for sport and cultural activities,
(d) bodies representing sport and exercise medicine and pre-hospital care, and
(e) bodies representing grassroots, community, school and youth sport.
(8) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
None 291
Baroness Leaman (LD)Clause 88, page 65, line 27, at end insert “, subject to the provisions of section (Autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England) (autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England).”
This amendment is consequential on another amendment in the name of Baroness Leaman.
None 6
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 4, page 3, leave out lines 22 to 29 and insert—
“1C Duty to improve public health and reduce health inequalities
(1) The Secretary of State must, in exercising functions in relation to the health service—
(a) take all reasonable steps to improve the health of the people of England and prevent illness,
(b) reduce health inequalities between the people of England,
(c) take all reasonable steps to reduce inequalities in the ability to access health services and in the outcomes achieved through the provision of health services, and
(d) address the social, economic and environmental determinants of health, including in relation to housing, education, employment, income and environmental conditions.
(2) In discharging the duties under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must take account of the need to prevent ill health by addressing its causes, as well as by providing services for the treatment of illness.”
This amendment strengthens the Secretary of State’s duties to improve public health and reduce health inequalities, including by addressing the social, economic and environmental determinants of health and preventing illness rather than relying on treatment alone.
None 15
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) ensure that national health data systems collect, analyse and publish data sufficient to identify and monitor health inequalities affecting inclusion health groups, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.”
This amendment would require national health data systems to collect, analyse and publish data sufficient to identify and monitor health inequalities affecting inclusion health groups, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities, to improve the evidence base for reducing health inequalities.
None 16
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(2) In exercising the duty under this section, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to reduce inequalities in access to health services and health outcomes experienced by inclusion health groups, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State, when exercising the statutory duty to reduce health inequalities, to have regard to the particular barriers to healthcare access and health outcomes experienced by inclusion health groups, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.
None 17
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed and annually thereafter, publish a report setting out—
(a) the steps taken to improve the identification of inclusion health groups within national health data systems,
(b) progress in reducing inequalities in access to health services and health outcomes experienced by those groups, and
(c) actions taken in relation to Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to publish regular reports on progress in identifying inclusion health groups in national health data and reducing health inequalities experienced by those groups, strengthening transparency and accountability.
Opposition Amendment 24
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—
“Patient choice: onward referrals by virtual and integrated health services
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision to ensure that a patient who has been accepted by an NHS provider organisation (including an NHS Trust, an NHS Foundation Trust, an Integrated Healthcare Organisation or a service accessed via NHS Online) and is referred onward by that body or service to a provider for elective care or treatment is offered the same choices in respect of that referral as would apply if the referral had been made by a general practitioner, dentist or optometrist.
(2) For the purposes of this section, “designated health service body” means—
(a) any body designated by the Secretary of State as providing virtual care or triage services to NHS patients in England;
(b) any body designated by the Secretary of State as an integrated healthcare organisation or organisation of equivalent description.
(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must in particular make provision designed to ensure that a designated health service body—
(a) does not restrict a patient’s choice of provider by reference to a closed list of preferred providers without first offering the patient the opportunity to exercise their right to choose from all providers available to provide the elective care concerned;
(b) has access to the NHS e-Referral Service, or any successor system, for the purpose of facilitating patient choice in respect of onward referrals.
(4) In this section, “onward referral” means a referral made by a designated health service body to another provider for the purposes of the patient receiving further investigation, treatment or care.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This amendment seeks to probe into the Secretary of State's duty to make provisions for up to five independent healthcare providers to assist with NHS care in order to lessen the burden across services and reduce travel time for patients.
Opposition Amendment 27
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—
“Access to health innovation networks
(1) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for a wide single national point of access to the health innovation networks in England.
(2) The arrangements must enable a person to—
(a) make a single request for support,
(b) be directed to the appropriate health innovation network or networks, and
(c) receive coordinated support where an innovation has potential application in more than one region.
(3) The Secretary of State must publish information about the operation and performance of the arrangements.”
This new clause would require a single national point of access through which innovators and other organisations could obtain coordinated support from the health innovation networks in England.
None 29
Baroness Gerada (XB)Clause 7, page 4, line 31, at end insert—
“(1A) In discharging the duty in subsection (1), the Secretary of State must ensure that education and training for persons employed in the health service in England includes training on recognising, preventing and responding to antisemitism and other forms of racism.”
This amendment seeks to ensure that the workforce education and training duty transferred from NHS England will include training on antisemitism and racism, as recommended by the Lord Mann review (recommendations 32 to 36).
None 33
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 10, page 6, leave out lines 14 to 21 and insert—
“12E Presumption in favour of public provision of health services
(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must secure, so far as reasonably practicable, that health services are provided by public bodies.
(2) A health service may be provided by a private-sector body only where the Secretary of State or other relevant public authority is satisfied that—
(a) no reasonable alternative is available for the provision of that service by a public body within a clinically appropriate timeframe, and
(b) the use of a private-sector body is necessary to ensure the provision of the service or to meet the healthcare needs of patients.
(3) A decision to arrange for a health service to be provided by a private-sector body under subsection (2) must—
(a) be supported by a published assessment of the available alternatives,
(b) explain why provision by a public body is not reasonably practicable, and
(c) be limited to the extent and duration necessary to meet the need identified.”
This amendment establishes a presumption that NHS services should be provided by public bodies and restricts private-sector provision to cases where no reasonable public-sector alternative is available within a clinically appropriate timeframe and private provision is necessary to meet patients’ needs.
Opposition Amendment 35
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 10, page 6, line 21, leave out “the health service” and insert “patients, where the Secretary of State is satisfied that the variation is necessary to improve patient outcomes”
This amendment would permit the Secretary of State deliberately to vary the balance between public, independent providers of health services only where the variation is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Its purpose is to prevent changes to the provider mix being made for ideological or political reasons.
None 36
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of existing private-sector provision of health services
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, undertake and publish a review of existing arrangements under which health services are provided by private-sector bodies.
(2) The review must assess—
(a) whether each arrangement remains necessary having regard to the presumption in favour of public provision of health services,
(b) the feasibility of providing the service through a public body,
(c) the financial, clinical and workforce implications of returning the service to public provision, and
(d) the steps and timescale for bringing the service into public provision where private-sector provision is no longer necessary.
(3) Following the review, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a plan for the progressive return to public provision of services for which private-sector provision is not necessary.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish an annual report on the implementation of the plan under subsection (3).”
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to review existing arrangements for the provision of NHS services by private-sector bodies, assess whether those arrangements remain necessary and identify opportunities to return services to public provision.
None 39
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)Clause 11, page 7, line 33, at end insert—
“(5) A direction under section 14Z61 may not be given for the purpose of determining an individual decision by an integrated care board concerning the commissioning, organisation or provision of a particular local health service, including a decision concerning—
(a) the opening, closure or relocation of a particular NHS service or facility,
(b) the location at which a particular NHS service is provided,
(c) the selection of a particular provider to provide NHS services, or
(d) the allocation of resources to a particular local service.
(6) A direction under section 14Z61 in relation to specialised services may be given only for the purpose of—
(a) determining which services are to be commissioned as specialised services,
(b) securing compliance with national standards, service specifications or commissioning policies relating to those services, or
(c) requiring collaboration between integrated care boards in commissioning those services.
(7) Nothing in subsections (5) and (6) prevents the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by section 14Z62A where the conditions in that section are met.”
This amendment would prevent the Secretary of State from using the general power of direction to determine individual local commissioning decisions, while limiting directions on specialised services to defined national purposes. It would preserve the separate intervention powers that apply where an integrated care board has significantly failed, or is at significant risk of significantly failing, to discharge its functions.
None 49
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Promoting access to dentistry equitably
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty to promote access to dentistry equitably
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure provision of dentistry across England accessible to all regardless of wealth or geography.””
None 50
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Promoting access to ambulance services equitably
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty to promote access to ambulance services equitably
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure provision of ambulance services across England accessible to all regardless of wealth or geography.””
None 51
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to provide NHS services publicly
In section 1 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (Secretary of State's duty to promote comprehensive health service) for subsection (2) substitute—
“(2) The Secretary of State must discharge the duty under subsection (1) by ensuring that services forming part of the health service in England are provided by public bodies.
(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), a service is not provided by a public body where its provision is contracted or otherwise arranged to be carried out by a private body.
(2B) In this section, “public body” means the Secretary of State, an integrated care board, an NHS trust, an NHS foundation trust, a local authority or another body established by or under an enactment to perform public functions.””
This amendment places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that NHS services are provided publicly, rather than arranging for their provision by other bodies.
None 52
Baroness Hayman (XB)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Duties as to climate change etc
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
“1CD Duties as to climate change etc
(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to—
(a) contribute towards compliance with—
(i) section 1 of the Climate Change Act 2008 (UK net zero emissions target), and
(ii) section 5 of the Environment Act 2021 (environmental targets: effects), and
(b) adapt to any current or predicted impacts of climate change identified in the most recent report under section 56 of the Climate Change Act 2008.
(2) The Secretary of State may publish guidance about the discharge of—
(a) the duty imposed on the Secretary of State by subsection (1) of this section;
(b) the duty imposed on integrated care boards by section 14Z44 (duties as to climate change etc);
(c) the duty imposed on NHS trusts by section 26B (duties in relation to climate change etc);
(d) the duty imposed on NHS foundation trusts by section 63B (duties in relation to climate change etc).
(3) In discharging their duty under section 14Z44, integrated care boards must have regard to guidance published under subsection (2).
(4) In discharging the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to guidance published under subsection (2).””
None 53
Lord Tarassenko (XB)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty as to UK suppliers and sovereign capability
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
“1CD Duty as to UK suppliers and sovereign capability
(1) The Secretary of State must take into account the matters mentioned in subsection (2)—
(a) in setting the award criteria for a relevant contract under section 23 of the Procurement Act 2023, so far as those matters relate to the subject matter of the contract, and
(b) in having regard, under section 12(1)(a) of that Act, to the importance of delivering value for money in connection with the award of a relevant contract.
(2) The matters are—
(a) the extent to which the data, control and support of the system concerned will remain within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom,
(b) the risks to the security and resilience of the health service arising from any respect in which they will not, including the risk that access to NHS patient data could be compelled under the law of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom, and
(c) so far as consistent with the international obligations of the United Kingdom, the contribution of the contract to developing and maintaining capability within the United Kingdom to design, deliver and support technology and information systems which handle NHS patient data.
(3) Subsections (4) and (5) apply to a material relevant contract under which—
(a) the data, control or support of the system concerned will not remain wholly within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, or
(b) the supplier, or any subcontractor with access to NHS patient data, is subject to the law of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom under which access to such data could be compelled,
(a “jurisdiction-risk contract”).
(4) Before entering into a jurisdiction-risk contract, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the National Cyber Security Centre,
(b) persons representing the interests of patients, and
(c) trade unions representing health service staff,
on the proposed contract, and must, before, or as soon as reasonably practicable after, entering into the contract, lay before Parliament a report on that consultation.
(5) As soon as reasonably practicable after entering into a jurisdiction-risk contract, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement setting out—
(a) the reasons for the award, including how the matters in subsection (2) were taken into account, and
(b) whether the Government is taking, or is planning to take, steps to develop or support long-term domestic alternatives to the systems provided under the contract.
(6) The Secretary of State must, at least once in every period of 12 months, lay before Parliament a report setting out—
(a) the number and total value of relevant contracts entered into during that period, the proportion of each awarded to UK suppliers, and the number and total value of jurisdiction-risk contracts entered into during that period; and
(b) how the award of those contracts has contributed to the objectives of any NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy published under section (NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy) of the Health Act 2026 (NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy).
(7) A report or statement under this section may omit information the publication of which would be reasonably likely to prejudice national security or the commercial interests of any person, but must state that information has been omitted.
(8) This section is without prejudice to the national security exemption under paragraph 25 of Schedule 2 to the Procurement Act 2023.
(9) In this section—
“material relevant contract” means a relevant contract with an estimated value, determined in accordance with Schedule 3 to the Procurement Act 2023, of more than the threshold amount that applies under Schedule 1 to that Act to a contract of that kind awarded by a central government authority, including a contract awarded under a framework and a renewal or extension of a relevant contract;
“NHS patient data” means patient information (within the meaning given in section 250E(7)) relating to persons who have received health care or social care in England;
“relevant contract” means a contract entered into by the Secretary of State for the provision of technology or information systems which—
(a) form part of the single patient record, or hold or process patient information for its purposes, or
(b) are provided for use across the health service in England as national systems and hold, process or provide access to NHS patient data;
“the single patient record” means the system for making patient information available referred to in section 250E(1), whether or not established by regulations under that section;
“UK supplier” means a company incorporated in the United Kingdom which either has no parent undertaking or each of whose parent undertakings (within the meaning of section 1162 of the Companies Act 2006) is incorporated, and has its head office, in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause would require procurement of the single patient record and national systems handling NHS patient data to weigh UK jurisdiction over data, control and support, and UK capability, with consultation and statements to Parliament for higher-value contracts outside UK jurisdiction, and an annual report on the UK share.
None 57
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 12, page 9, leave out lines 33 to 39 and insert—
“(2) Before prescribing a service or facility under subsection (1)(b), the Secretary of State must publish an assessment of the likely impact of such a prescription on—
(a) patient safety,
(b) clinical outcomes,
(c) equality of access to services,
(d) workforce capacity and specialist expertise,
(e) service sustainability, and
(f) geographical variation in access to, and outcomes from, services.
(2A) The Secretary of State must lay the assessment under subsection (2) before both Houses of Parliament.
(2B) In deciding whether it would be appropriate to prescribe a service or facility under subsection (1)(b), the Secretary of State must have regard to the assessment published under subsection (2).
(2C) Where regulations made under subsection (1)(b) prescribe a service or facility for commissioning other than by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of State must publish and maintain a national service framework for that service or facility.
(2D) A framework under subsection (2C) must include provision relating to—
(a) service standards,
(b) care pathways,
(c) workforce requirements,
(d) rehabilitation and long-term follow-up,
(e) collection and publication of outcome data,
(f) coordination between specialist, community and neighbourhood services, and
(g) coordination of care for persons receiving treatment through multiple clinical pathways.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to publish an impact assessment before they make a decision to prescribe a service or facility under subsection (1)(b) of section 3B of the National Health Service Act 2006 and maintain a national service framework for any specialised service no longer commissioned directly by the Secretary of State.
Opposition Amendment 68
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 16, page 12, line 22, at end insert—
“14Z45BA Patient choice: community services substituting for consultant-led elective care
(1) Regulations under section 14Z45B(1) must make provision to enable patients to make choices in respect of non-consultant-led community services where those services are commissioned as a direct substitute for, or to prevent a referral to, consultant-led elective services.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a service is to be regarded as a direct substitute for, or intended to prevent a referral to, consultant-led elective services if it—
(a) provides assessment, diagnosis, treatment or management for a condition that would otherwise be referred to a secondary care specialist, or
(b) is commissioned by an integrated care board for the purpose of reducing or managing demand on secondary or elective care.
(3) Services to which this section applies include but are not limited to—
(a) community adult audiology services,
(b) community glaucoma management and monitoring services,
(c) Minor Eye Conditions Services, and
(d) Community Urgent Eyecare Services.
(4) Regulations made by virtue of this section must make provision designed to ensure that—
(a) patients are offered a choice of any clinically appropriate provider commissioned under a qualifying NHS contract for the relevant service,
(b) no limitation on the number of providers from which a patient may choose is imposed solely on the grounds of cost or demand management, and
(c) patients are provided with information enabling them to make an informed choice, including information about waiting times and quality.
(5) An integrated care board must not commission a community service of a kind falling within subsection (2) in a manner which has the effect of restricting patient choice below the standard that would apply to an equivalent consultant-led elective service.”
This amendment seeks to probe the choices open to patients of community services provided by non-NHS healthcare providers and whether patients have the choice of up to five providers for hospital care.
None 73
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)After Clause 17, insert the following Clause—
“Annual report on specialised services
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the commissioning and performance of all specialised services.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must include information relating to—
(a) patient outcomes,
(b) access to services,
(c) waiting times,
(d) workforce capacity,
(e) service sustainability,
(f) geographical variation in services,
(g) compliance with national service specifications, and
(h) arrangements for the coordination of specialist, community and neighbourhood care.
(3) A report under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on all commissioned specialised services.
None 74
Lord Sharkey (LD)After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause—
“Clinical leadership in specialised commissioning
The Secretary of State must make arrangements to ensure that all specialised commissioning, including specialised commissioning at Integrated Board Level, is informed by national clinical leadership and specialist clinical advice in the—
(a) planning of the commissioning arrangements,
(b) design of services and arrangements for service delivery, and
(c) monitoring of the performance of specialist services.”
This new clause requires clinical leadership in the commissioning of specialised services, whether commissioned by the Secretary of State or Integrated Care Boards. This could include, but is not limited to, maintaining NHS England’s existing infrastructure of Clinical Reference Groups, National Clinical Directors and National Speciality Advisers.
None 75
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause—
“Adult gender services: service specification, data and reporting
(1) This section applies to gender dysphoria services for adults which, immediately before the abolition of NHS England, were commissioned by NHS England as specialised services.
(2) The Secretary of State must—
(a) maintain a national service specification for the services described in subsection (1), founded on the principles of evidence-based medicine,
(b) ensure that every provider of such services submits, as a condition of its contract, complete quarterly data to the specialised services quality dashboard or its successor, including outcome and complication measures, and
(c) maintain a single national waiting list for such services.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and annually thereafter, lay before Parliament a report on—
(a) implementation of each recommendation of the Operational and Delivery Review of NHS Adult Gender Dysphoria Clinics led by Dr David Levy (published December 2025), including the identity of the body accountable for each recommendation following the abolition of NHS England,
(b) compliance by each provider with the data duty in subsection (2)(b), identifying any provider that has failed to submit complete data, and
(c) waiting times, referral volumes and discharge outcomes for the services described in subsection (1).”
This new clause seeks to preserve, on the abolition of NHS England, national accountability for adult gender dysphoria services, by requiring an evidence-based national specification, mandatory outcome data as a contractual condition, and annual reporting to Parliament on implementation of the Levy recommendations.
None 79
Baroness Gerada (XB)Clause 21, page 16, line 5, at end insert—
“(4) A performance assessment must include an assessment of how well the integrated care board has discharged its duty under section (Antisemitism, racism and extremism: duties of NHS bodies and annual report) of the Health Act 2026.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State’s annual performance assessment of each integrated care board to cover how well it has prevented and responded to antisemitism, other forms of racism and support for proscribed organisations that affects patients and staff.
None 80
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 21, page 16, line 5, at end insert—
“(4) In conducting a performance assessment under this section, the Secretary of State must assess the discharge by an integrated care board of any functions relating to specialised services.
(5) An assessment under subsection (4) must consider—
(a) patient outcomes,
(b) access to services,
(c) compliance with national service specifications,
(d) workforce capacity,
(e) service sustainability, and
(f) geographical variation in access to, and outcomes from, services.
(6) The report published under subsection (3) must include a summary of the assessments undertaken under subsections (4) and (5).”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to undertake and publish a national assessment of the performance of integrated care boards in relation to specialised services.
None 94
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty of integrated care boards to promote collaboration
(1) An integrated care board must, in exercising its functions, promote collaboration and integration between NHS bodies and other relevant health and care organisations.
(2) The duty under subsection (1) includes a duty to—
(a) plan services in collaboration with NHS providers, primary care providers, local authorities and relevant voluntary and community organisations,
(b) consider the effect of commissioning decisions on the integration, continuity and long-term provision of NHS services,
(c) seek opportunities for NHS bodies to provide services collaboratively, rather than through arrangements that unnecessarily fragment service provision, and
(d) have regard to the benefits of cooperation between providers in improving population health and reducing health inequalities.
(3) An integrated care board must publish an assessment of how it has fulfilled the duties under this section in its annual report.”
This new clause requires integrated care boards to promote collaboration across NHS, primary care, local authority, voluntary and community services, supporting a bottom-up approach to decision-making that reflects local needs and encourages joined-up service planning and delivery.
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 24 stand part of the Bill.
None 100
Baroness Gerada (XB)Clause 25, page 18, line 26, at end insert—
“(5A) In preparing a plan under this section, the responsible local authority and each of its partner integrated care boards must take reasonable steps to reduce health inequalities in the area resulting from differences in respect of general health determinants, including through ensuring the meaningful involvement of communities who face disproportionate barriers to participation.”
This amendment seeks to create a specific requirement for local authorities and ICBs to meaningfully reduce health inequalities arising from the wider determinants of health as part of their neighbourhood health plans. The amendment seeks to ensure that individuals are involved in developing the plans, especially those most affected by health inequalities.
Opposition Amendment 102
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 25, insert the following new Clause—
“Joint local health and wellbeing strategies
(1) The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 is amended as set out in subsections (2) and (3).
(2) After section 116A of the insert—
“116AA Joint local health and wellbeing strategies
(1) Where an assessment of relevant needs is prepared under section 116 by a responsible local authority, the responsible local authority and each of its partner integrated care boards must prepare a joint local health and wellbeing strategy setting out priorities for meeting those needs, improving health and wellbeing and reducing health inequalities in the authority’s area, including in relation to the wider determinants of health.
(2) A neighbourhood health plan prepared under section 116A must be consistent with any joint local health and wellbeing strategy for that area.
(3) A neighbourhood health plan may form part of a joint local health and wellbeing strategy.”
(3) In section 116B (as substituted by section 25 of this Act), after paragraph (b) insert—
“(c) any joint local health and wellbeing strategy prepared under section 116AA.”
(4) In section 196(1) of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (functions of Health and Wellbeing Boards), for “sections 116 and 116A” substitute “sections 116, 116A and 116AA”.”
This amendment would retain joint local health and wellbeing strategies as the democratically owned strategic framework for local health and wellbeing, require neighbourhood health plans to be consistent with them, restore the duty on local authorities and integrated care boards to have regard to them, and keep preparing them a function of the Health and Wellbeing Board.
Opposition Amendment 105
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Schedule 3, page 99, line 18, at end insert—
“(6) The Secretary of State may appoint a person as chair or another non-executive director only following a recommendation made by an independent appointments panel.
(7) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision about the composition and operation of independent appointments panels under this paragraph.
(8) Regulations under this paragraph must provide that each panel must include persons with knowledge of, and a connection to, the area principally served by the NHS foundation trust.
(9) Before making regulations under this paragraph, the Secretary of State must consult NHS foundation trusts, persons who are or have been members of councils of governors, patients and such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(10) Regulations under this paragraph must be made by statutory instrument and may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This amendment would require appointments of chairs and non-executive directors of NHS foundation trusts to be made following recommendations by independent appointments panels with local representation. Its purpose is to probe how the Government will prevent the centralisation and politicisation of appointments, and how the Department will manage the practical burden of making appointments across all foundation trusts.
None 111
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Hospices: supply and disposal of medicines and medical supplies
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument enable qualifying voluntary hospices providing palliative or end of life care to obtain medicines and medical supplies through the pharmaceutical supply arrangements of the health service.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) may make provision about—
(a) the meaning of “qualifying hospices”, and
(b) the medicines and supplies that may be obtained.
(3) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for the disposal of expired, unwanted or surplus medicines and medical supplies by qualifying hospices.
(4) Regulations under subsection (3) may make provision about—
(a) the collection, return and destruction of medicines, and
(b) the meaning of “qualifying hospices”.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
NHS patients in NHS hospitals or at home in the community are eligible for NHS prescribed medications at no additional cost. However, in some hospices, the hospice itself has to purchase the medications for these same patients as the hospice does not have a contract covering NHS supply of medications.
None 112
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing
(1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if—
(a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and
(b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
(2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
This new clause would require the Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing to be brought before the House for a vote.
None 126
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 52, page 36, line 33, at end insert—
“(ca) enabling a patient, following diagnosis of a health condition, to consent to the sharing of such information as is necessary for the purpose of enabling an approved voluntary, community or charitable organisation to offer or provide condition-specific support services to the patient;
(cb) facilitating referral, where consent has been provided, to such an organisation under subsection (ca);”
This amendment would ensure that regulations establishing the single patient record may include provision enabling patients, following diagnosis, to consent to referral and information sharing with approved voluntary, community and charitable organisations providing condition-specific support services.
Opposition Amendment 127
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert—
“(e) requiring any electronic health records which contribute patient information to, or interoperate with, the system to support interoperable data standards and secure integration through application programming interfaces, so that clinical information, including clinical documentation generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence, can be exchanged securely between systems.”
This amendment would allow regulations establishing the single patient record to require all electronic health record systems contributing to or interoperating with it to support open, standards-based application programming interface (API) integration.
Opposition Amendment 131
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert—
“(2A) Regulations under subsection (1) must require the establishment and maintenance of an electronic register of each occasion on which patient information made available through the system is accessed.
(2B) The register must record—
(a) the identity, organisation and role of the person accessing the information,
(b) the date and time of the access,
(c) the information accessed, and
(d) the purpose of the access.
(2C) Regulations under subsection (1) must provide for a patient—
(a) to inspect, without charge, entries in the register relating to their information, and
(b) to request an investigation of any access which the patient believes was unauthorised or improper.
(2D) The register must record access undertaken for the provision of care and access undertaken for research, planning, commissioning or any other purpose.”
This amendment would require every access to information through the single patient record to be recorded in an electronic register and would give patients the right to inspect the entries relating to their information and challenge potentially improper access.
Opposition Amendment 135
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert—
“(4A) Regulations under subsection (1) must make provision securing that sensitive patient information may not be made available through the system to a person involved in the provision of health care or social care unless—
(a) the patient has given explicit consent to the information being made available to that person or to a specified description of persons, and
(b) that consent remains in force at the time at which the information is accessed.
(4B) Regulations made for the purposes of subsection (4A) must provide for a patient to—
(a) specify the persons, or descriptions of persons, to whom sensitive patient information may be made available,
(b) give, vary or withdraw consent easily and without charge,
(c) restrict consent to specified information, specified purposes or a specified period, and
(d) obtain a record of each occasion on which sensitive patient information relating to the patient has been accessed, including the identity or description of the person accessing it and the date and purpose of the access.
(4C) Regulations under subsection (1) may provide for sensitive patient information to be made available without the consent required by subsection (4A) only where—
(a) access to the information is necessary to prevent death or serious harm to the patient or another person,
(b) it is not reasonably practicable to obtain the patient’s consent, and
(c) the access is limited to the information strictly necessary for that purpose.
(4D) Where sensitive patient information is accessed by virtue of subsection (4C)—
(a) the access and the reasons for it must be recorded,
(b) the patient must be notified as soon as reasonably practicable, unless notification would create a serious risk of harm to the patient or another person, and
(c) the access must be subject to subsequent review in accordance with provision made by the regulations.
(4E) In this section, “sensitive patient information” means patient information relating to—
(a) sexual or reproductive health,
(b) termination of pregnancy,
(c) fertility treatment,
(d) mental health diagnosis or treatment,
(e) substance misuse diagnosis or treatment,
(f) genetic information, or
(g) any other description of information prescribed by regulations as requiring enhanced protection by reason of its particularly private or sensitive character.
(4F) Consent for the purposes of this section must be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous, and must be indicated by a clear affirmative action.
(4G) A patient must not be denied or disadvantaged in the provision of health care or social care solely because the patient has not given consent under subsection (4A).”
This amendment would require regulations establishing the single patient record to provide enhanced protection for particularly sensitive health information. Such information could ordinarily be viewed only by persons, or descriptions of persons, expressly authorised by the patient. A limited exception would permit access without consent where strictly necessary.
Opposition Amendment 136
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert—
“(4A) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report setting out—
(a) the person or persons who will be the controller of patient information processed through the system,
(b) the respective responsibilities of any controllers, joint controllers and processors,
(c) the arrangements for the custody, stewardship and security of patient information,
(d) the location of the servers on which patient information will principally be stored and processed,
(e) the circumstances in which patient information may be stored, processed or accessed outside the United Kingdom,
(f) the legal jurisdictions to which the information and the persons processing it may be subject, and
(g) the safeguards that will prevent patient information from being accessed under the law of another jurisdiction in a manner incompatible with the law of the United Kingdom.
(4B) The Secretary of State must consult the Information Commissioner before laying the report required by this subsection.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to clarify the governance, control, stewardship, location and legal jurisdiction of data used in the single patient record before making regulations establishing the system.
Opposition Amendment 137
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert—
“(4A) Regulations under this section must make provision for patient information generated in connection with health care provided—
(a) as part of the health service, or
(b) otherwise than as part of the health service, including health care provided by independent healthcare providers.
to be made available through the system to persons providing health care in either setting, where the information is relevant and necessary for the direct care of the patient.”
This amendment would ensure that relevant patient information generated in both NHS and independent healthcare settings can be included in the single patient record and made available to NHS and independent healthcare providers where it is necessary for the patient’s direct care.
None 142
Lord Tarassenko (XB)Clause 52, page 38, line 16, at end insert—
“250G Duty to bring forward reform of scientific research in the public interest
(1) Before the end of the period mentioned in subsection (2), the Secretary of State must publish a draft of regulations under section 251 making provision for—
(a) the use of confidential patient information held in connection with the single patient record established under section 250E for the purposes of scientific research in the public interest, and
(b) the protection of patient privacy and confidentiality in connection with such use, including respect for any objection by a patient to such use.
(2) The period is 12 months beginning with the day on which section 250E comes into force.
(3) Before publishing the draft regulations required by subsection (1), the Secretary of State must—
(a) carry out a public consultation on the proposals for those regulations, for a period of not less than 12 weeks,
(b) consult the National Data Guardian and such other persons with expertise in the secondary use of health data for research purposes as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and
(c) publish a response to the consultation carried out under paragraph (a).
(4) In this section—
“confidential patient information” has the same meaning as in section 251;
“National Data Guardian” means the person appointed under section 1 of the Health and Social Care (National Data Guardian) Act 2018;
“patient” includes an individual who needs or receives social care or whose need for such care is being assessed; and
“scientific research” has the same meaning as in Article 4(2) of the UK GDPR.”
This new section seeks to set a timetable for reforming the rules on confidential patient information, so that patient data in the single patient record can be used for scientific research in the public interest, with safeguards for patient privacy and objections, following public consultation.
None 143
Lord Tarassenko (XB)Clause 52, page 38, line 16, at end insert—
“250G Single patient record: sovereign data asset, national security and parliamentary accountability
(1) Patient information held in, or made available through, the single patient record is a sovereign data asset, held for the benefit of patients, the health service in England and the public.
(2) The Secretary of State must take appropriate steps for securing that—
(a) patient information held in, or made available through, the single patient record is hosted and stored only on servers located in the United Kingdom, and
(b) no person accesses the single patient record from outside the United Kingdom for the purposes of its technical support, maintenance or administration.
(3) The Secretary of State must not establish, or permit the establishment or continuation of, arrangements for the hosting, storage or processing of patient information held in, or made available through, the single patient record unless satisfied that—
(a) such information is encrypted, when stored and when transmitted, using encryption keys held and controlled only by a health service body, so that it cannot be read by any supplier or subcontractor, or any other person, without the authority of that body,
(b) appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent access to such information that is unauthorised, or compelled under a legal, regulatory or judicial requirement of a jurisdiction outside the United Kingdom, by any person, including a foreign state, foreign public authority, or person acting on their behalf, and to prevent the disclosure or transfer of such information pursuant to any such requirement,
(c) the ownership, governance and control arrangements of any supplier or subcontractor with access to such information do not present an unacceptable national security risk, and
(d) appropriate arrangements are in place to ensure the operational resilience, continuity and recoverability of the single patient record.
(4) In relation to arrangements in place immediately before this section comes into force, subsections (2) and (3) apply only from the end of the period of 24 months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force.
(5) The Secretary of State must, as soon as reasonably practicable after any material change of supplier or subcontractor, or of the ownership or control of a supplier or subcontractor, with access to such information—
(a) review whether subsection (3) continues to be met, and
(b) lay before Parliament a statement of the outcome of that review.
(6) Subsection (2) does not apply to—
(a) the temporary storage of patient information on a device used to access it for the purposes of direct care, including direct care provided in the British Islands outside the United Kingdom, or
(b) access from outside the United Kingdom which is necessary to respond to an emergency incident affecting the security or operation of the single patient record, if the access continues only for as long as is necessary for that purpose and is notified to the National Cyber Security Centre, with the reasons for it, within 24 hours of the access beginning.
(7) In determining whether subsection (3)(c) is met, the Secretary of State must have regard to advice from the National Cyber Security Centre and such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(8) This section is without prejudice to the national security exemption under paragraph 25 of Schedule 2 to the Procurement Act 2023 and the national security exclusion ground under paragraph 14 of Schedule 7 to that Act, which continue to apply to any relevant procurement in connection with the single patient record.
(9) Before a draft of the first regulations under section 250E is laid before Parliament or, if earlier, before the single patient record comes into operation or, if it is already in operation, within three months of this section coming into force, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement setting out—
(a) how the requirements of this section have been satisfied,
(b) the arrangements for governance of the single patient record,
(c) the categories of organisation that will be permitted access to information made available through the single patient record, and
(d) the safeguards applicable to such access.
(10) The Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament an updated statement under subsection (9) at least once in every period of 12 months during which the single patient record is in operation; and each updated statement must summarise any change of supplier or subcontractor during that period which was not the subject of a statement under subsection (5).
(11) In this section—
“health service body” has the meaning given in section 9(4);
“patient information” has the meaning given in section 250E(7);
“the single patient record” means the system for making patient information available referred to in section 250E(1), whether or not established by regulations under that section.”
This new section would make single patient record data a sovereign data asset. The Secretary of State would have to take appropriate steps to secure UK-only storage and no overseas support access, and ensure NHS-held encryption keys, safeguards against foreign access and resilience, reporting to Parliament before establishment and annually.
None 150
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Single patient record: development and implementation
(1) The Secretary of State must consult Scottish Ministers, Welsh Ministers and Northern Ireland Ministers on the development and implementation of the single patient record under section 150E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act).
(2) The Secretary of State must publish an annual report in each calendar year on the progress of the development and implementation of the single patient record.”
None 164
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Unauthorised access to patient information
(1) A person commits an offence if the person knowingly accesses patient information and the access is not authorised.
(2) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine (or both).
(3) In this section—
“patient information” has the same meaning as section 251(10) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (definition of “patient information”);
“authorised” means in the proper exercise of the person’s functions.”
Opposition Amendment 165
Baroness Cash (Con) - Shadow Minister (Education)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Recording of ethnicity in health and care information
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that any information standard, and any specification of the single patient record, made or maintained under this Act requires the ethnicity of every patient to be recorded as a standard data field—
(a) as stated by the patient,
(b) using the ethnic group classification used in the most recent census of England and Wales, recorded at the most detailed level of that classification and reportable at each higher level of aggregation, and
(c) subject to correction at the patient’s request.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish updated standards and guidance for the recording of ethnicity in health and care information, superseding any standards or guidance based on a classification other than that described in subsection (1)(b).
(3) The Secretary of State must publish annually an assessment of the completeness, consistency and accuracy of ethnicity recording in NHS records, including variation by region and type of provider, together with the steps being taken to improve it.
(4) The duty in subsection (1) includes ensuring that data relating to conditions with marked differential prevalence or outcomes by ethnicity, including sickle cell disease and thalassaemia, can be planned for, analysed and published by reference to the field recorded under that subsection.”
This new clause ensures that the single patient record established by this Act records every patient’s ethnicity as the patient states it, using current census categories in place of guidance based on the 2001 census, so that conditions such as sickle cell disease can be planned, costed and audited and ethnic inequalities in care identified.
Opposition Amendment 166
Baroness Cash (Con) - Shadow Minister (Education)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Recording of sex in health and care information
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that any information standard, and any specification of the single patient record, made or maintained under this Act requires—
(a) the sex of every patient to be recorded accurately as a mandatory data field,
(b) that field to record sex at birth, meaning male or female only, and
(c) where a patient so wishes, and where lawful under the data protection legislation and the Gender Recognition Act 2004, gender identity or acquired gender to be recorded as a separate and additional data field.
(2) The data field in subsection (1)(a) may be altered only—
(a) to correct a clerical error, or
(b) to correct the record of a patient with a medically verified difference of sexual development.
(3) Within 12 months of the passing of this Act the Secretary of State must publish a review of the accuracy of sex data held in NHS records, and a plan for its correction, having regard to the recommendations of the independent review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender led by Professor Alice Sullivan (March 2025).
(4) In this section “sex” has the same meaning as in the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.”
This new clause ensures that the single patient record established by this Act records every patient’s biological sex accurately as a mandatory field, with gender identity recordable separately, giving statutory effect to the recommendations of the Sullivan Review, which the Secretary of State has accepted, and to the change made to the NHS Core Information Standard in April 2026.
Opposition Amendment 167
Baroness Cash (Con) - Shadow Minister (Education)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Recording and publication of diagnostic data
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that any information standard, and any specification of the single patient record, made or maintained under this Act requires, in respect of any diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism or a common mental health condition, the recording of—
(a) the assessment pathway and type of provider, including whether the assessment was carried out by an independent provider under the NHS right to choose, to be recorded, and
(b) the diagnostic criteria and assessment standards applied to be recorded.
(2) The Secretary of State must publish annually data on diagnoses of the conditions described in subsection (1), disaggregated by age, sex, region, provider type and assessment route, together with waiting times for assessment.
(3) In this section “sex” has the same meaning as in the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.”
This new clause ensures that the single patient record and information standards established by this Act record how and by whom diagnoses of ADHD, autism and common mental health conditions are made, and requires annual publication of disaggregated data, so that Parliament, clinicians and researchers can establish whether variation in diagnosis rates reflects need or differences in assessment practice.
None 168
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Prohibition on commercial access to identifiable NHS patient data
(1) A commercial entity, or any employee, officer or subcontractor of such an entity, must not be granted access to identifiable patient data held by or on behalf of the NHS.
(2) Subsection (1) applies to all forms of access, including—
(a) direct access to patient records,
(b) administrative, privileged or system-wide access to databases or data environments containing identifiable patient data,
(c) access through software, analytics platforms, application programming interfaces or other technical systems, and
(d) access to identifiable patient data for the purposes of technical support, system maintenance, development or testing.
(3) A commercial entity may provide technical services involving NHS data only where the service can be performed using anonymised data or, where necessary, pseudonymised data within an environment controlled by the NHS.
(4) The Secretary of State must ensure that existing contractual arrangements are brought into compliance with this section within six months of the day on which this Act is passed.
(5) The Secretary of State must publish an annual report identifying any exceptions to subsection (1), the reasons for them, the duration of the access and the safeguards applied.”
This amendment prohibits commercial entities and their personnel from accessing identifiable NHS patient data, including through administrative access to systems, and requires technical services to be delivered using anonymised or pseudonymised data wherever possible.
None 169
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Public control of NHS data infrastructure
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that the digital infrastructure used nationally to integrate, store, access and analyse NHS patient data is owned, operated and controlled by the NHS or another public authority.
(2) No relevant NHS body may enter into or continue an arrangement under which a private company has operational control of national NHS patient-data infrastructure.
(3) A private company may provide technical goods or services to the NHS only where—
(a) the NHS retains ownership and effective control of the infrastructure and all NHS data,
(b) the company has no independent right to access, use, disclose or retain NHS data,
(c) the arrangement does not prevent the NHS from operating, modifying or transferring the infrastructure independently of that company, and
(d) the arrangement includes enforceable provisions for the transfer of systems, data and technical documentation to the NHS or a replacement provider.
(4) The Secretary of State must take all reasonable steps to bring existing arrangements into compliance with this section.
(5) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a plan, with a timetable, for the establishment of publicly controlled NHS data infrastructure.”
This amendment requires critical NHS data infrastructure to be publicly owned, operated and controlled, while permitting private suppliers to provide technical services without acquiring control over NHS systems or data.
None 170
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Women’s health: data and communications
(1) In exercising functions under this Act relating to the collection, analysis or publication of information, the Secretary of State must ensure that data relating to health and care is collected and published disaggregated by sex and age, including in relation to—
(a) maternity and neonatal services,
(b) screening programmes for cervical, breast and ovarian cancer,
(c) conditions that present differently in, or predominantly affect, women, and
(d) clinical research and audit.
(2) Data within subsection (1)(a) and (b) must also be published disaggregated by ethnicity, recorded in accordance with section (Recording of ethnicity in health and care information).
(3) The Secretary of State must ensure that public communications by NHS bodies concerning maternity services and female-specific conditions and screening use clear, accurate, sex-based terminology (including “woman” and “mother”), which may be supplemented by additional terms where an NHS body considers it appropriate.
(4) In this section “sex” has the same meaning as in the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.”
This new clause requires health data to be collected and published disaggregated by sex and age, with maternity and screening data also published by ethnicity, and requires NHS communications on maternity care and female-specific conditions and screening to use clear sex-based language, while permitting additional terms.
None 171
Lord Tarassenko (XB)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish and lay before Parliament a strategy (“the NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy”) setting out the Government’s approach to—
(a) treating NHS patient data as a sovereign data asset, including where such data is stored and from where it may be accessed,
(b) maintaining the security and resilience of relevant NHS information systems by assessing, managing and mitigating risks—
(i) associated with foreign interference, and
(ii) arising from reliance on foreign-supplied technologies,
(c) preventing over-reliance on health care suppliers that are not UK suppliers by building domestic capability, and
(d) enabling access to NHS patient data for scientific research and the development of artificial intelligence models in a manner that maintains public trust.
(2) The strategy must include—
(a) an assessment of the risks associated with—
(i) hardware,
(ii) software,
(iii) supply chains, and
(iv) procurement processes
in the NHS;
(b) a specific focus on security and resilience in NHS digital procurement processes, detailing how the Government intends to reduce strategic dependencies on foreign-owned service providers to mitigate the risk of systemic disruption, and how capability within the United Kingdom, and the extent to which data, control and support remain within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, will be taken into account in assessing value for money;
(c) options to prioritise the use of technologies developed in the United Kingdom by UK suppliers in relevant NHS information systems, consistent with the international obligations of the United Kingdom, to reduce reliance on foreign technologies;
(d) the arrangements for publishing and maintaining information standards under section 250 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (powers to publish information standards) for the single patient record, including standards for interoperability, and for securing compliance with those standards by persons providing information technology for the single patient record;
(e) the arrangements the Government intends to put in place for a hierarchy of access to pseudonymised patient data from the single patient record for scientific research and the development of artificial intelligence models, including—
(i) preferential access, in descending order of preference, for—
(A) researchers in universities and other public research bodies in the United Kingdom, charities whose purposes include medical or health research, and the health service, including the National Institute for Health and Care Research, when conducting its own research,
(B) UK suppliers, and
(C) other persons;
(ii) the basis on which the health service will share in the value created by such access, which may differ between, and need not involve any charge to, the categories of person in sub-paragraph (i), and how any returns will be reinvested in the health service;
(iii) conditions of access, including a requirement of public benefit and a requirement that data is accessed only within a trusted research environment located in the United Kingdom, with outputs checked before release; and
(iv) how those arrangements build on the model of access operated by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency for the Clinical Practice Research Datalink;
(f) proposals for developing sovereign artificial intelligence model capability for the health service using longitudinal data from the single patient record linking primary care, secondary care and outcome data;
(g) the steps the Government intends to take, and the timetable for taking them, to address barriers to access to NHS patient data for scientific research, including—
(i) reform of the Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/1438),
(ii) arrangements for linking NHS patient data, including coded primary care data, with other research datasets, including those held by UK Biobank and Our Future Health, and
(iii) arrangements agreed or proposed with the Scottish Ministers, the Welsh Ministers and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland for access to patient data for scientific research across the United Kingdom;
(h) arrangements for transparency about access to NHS patient data and for patients to opt out, including through the NHS App, of the use of their pseudonymised data for scientific research, and how those arrangements relate to the national data opt-out;
(i) the steps the Government intends to take to support and develop sufficient domestic capability in the NHS where it does not currently exist; and
(j) where risks are identified, how the Government intends to address those risks by supporting the use or development of domestic technologies or systems.
(3) In preparing the strategy, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the National Cyber Security Centre,
(b) the Information Commissioner,
(c) the National Data Guardian,
(d) persons representing the interests of patients,
(e) the Scottish Ministers, the Welsh Ministers and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland, and
(f) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) The Secretary of State must—
(a) lay before Parliament a report on progress in implementing the strategy at least once in every period of 12 months, and
(b) review the strategy at least once in every period of three years and publish and lay before Parliament any revised strategy.
(5) In this section—
“National Data Guardian” means the person appointed under section 1 of the Health and Social Care (National Data Guardian) Act 2018;
“NHS patient data” means patient information (within the meaning given in section 250E(7) of the National Health Service Act 2006) relating to persons who have received health care or social care in England;
“pseudonymised” , in relation to data, means processed by way of pseudonymisation within the meaning given in Article 4(1)(5) of the UK GDPR;
“relevant information system” means an information or communications system which forms part of the single patient record or is used to hold or process patient information for the purposes of it;
“the single patient record” means the system for making patient information available referred to in section 250E(1) of the National Health Service Act 2006, whether or not established by regulations under that section;
“UK supplier” means a company incorporated in the United Kingdom which either has no parent undertaking or each of whose parent undertakings (within the meaning of section 1162 of the Companies Act 2006) is incorporated, and has its head office, in the United Kingdom.”
This new clause would require an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy within 12 months of Royal Assent, on treating NHS patient data as a sovereign data asset, reducing reliance on foreign technology, building UK capability, and research access to pseudonymised data, including preferential access, NHS benefit-sharing and confidential patient information reform.
None 172
Baroness Kidron (XB)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS data: standards
(1) NHS patient and public health data is to be treated according to the standards in subsection (2).
(2) The standards for treating NHS data are—
(a) that the data is stored in the United Kingdom;
(b) that any use of the data for research and innovation purposes must be in the public interest;
(c) that the economic and technical value of any intellectual property or technology or information system built using the data must be retained in the UK and shared with the NHS;
(d) that any use of the data must comply with UK data protection laws;
(e) that application programming interfaces must be used as bridges between the data asset and client software of authorised license holders.
(3) The Secretary of State must make the following provisions in relation to NHS data—
(a) provisions to enable priority access to NHS data to researchers based in the United Kingdom;
(b) provisions to ensure that any researcher who builds intellectual property or a technology or information system using NHS data is based in the UK;
(c) provisions to restrict access to intellectual property or a technology or information system built using NHS data, if ownership of the intellectual property is to be transferred from a researcher based in the UK to a researcher based overseas.”
This amendment seeks to establish protections to ensure that NHS patient data remains in the UK, and that the benefits and value of technology built using NHS data is retained in the UK for the NHS and patient care.
Opposition Amendment 180
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“National Care Service: implementation plan
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a report setting out the Government’s proposals for the establishment of a National Care Service.
(2) The report must include—
(a) the intended functions and scope of the National Care Service,
(b) a statement of how the National Care Service would work alongside—
(i) the National Health Service,
(ii) local authorities,
(iii) charities and voluntary organisations,
(iv) social enterprises, and
(v) existing public and independent social care providers,
(c) a statement of how the establishment of the National Care Service would affect the statutory responsibilities of NHS bodies and local authorities,
(d) the arrangements for the commissioning and provision of services by the organisations listed in subsection (2)(b),
(e) the Government’s estimate of the costs of establishing and operating the National Care Service,
(f) the proposed sources and levels of funding for the National Care Service,
(g) the period for which funding settlements are expected to be made,
(h) the expected timetable for the establishment and implementation of the National Care Service, and
(i) the arrangements for transitional funding and for maintaining continuity of existing social care services.
(3) In preparing the report, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) NHS bodies,
(b) local authorities,
(c) persons receiving social care and their carers,
(d) representatives of the social care workforce,
(e) charities and voluntary organisations involved in the provision of social care, and
(f) other persons providing social care services whom the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) The report must include a summary of the consultation undertaken under subsection (3) and explain how the views expressed have informed the Government’s proposals.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an implementation plan for a National Care Service, including its relationship with the NHS, local authorities, charities and existing social care providers, together with details of its funding, commissioning arrangements and implementation timetable.
None 189
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) Any report published by the Commissioner must present data on maternity and neonatal outcomes disaggregated by—
(a) the age, ethnicity and area deprivation of the mother, and
(b) the sex of the baby,
so far as such data is held, with ethnicity recorded in accordance with section (Recording of ethnicity in health and care information).”
This amendment ensures the Commissioner reports outcomes by the factors known to drive maternal and neonatal risk, including the near-threefold higher maternal mortality of Black women and the doubled rate in the most deprived areas reported by MBRRACE-UK.
None 190
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After subsection (5) insert—
“(5A) In communications to patients and the public, the Commissioner must use clear and accurate sex-based terminology, including “woman” and “mother”, which may be supplemented by additional terms where the Commissioner considers it appropriate.”
This amendment requires the Commissioner to communicate in clear language about women and mothers, while permitting additional terms.
None 191
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After subsection (10) insert—
“(11) In this section—
“woman” has the meaning given by section 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16;
“mother” , in relation to a child, means the woman who is carrying or has carried the child.”
This amendment defines “woman” consistently with the Equality Act 2010 as interpreted by the Supreme Court, and “mother” consistently with section 33 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, for the purposes of the Commissioner’s functions.
None 205
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause—
“Environmental impact of NHS medicines and medical products
(1) The Secretary of State must take all reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies, when procuring medicines, medical devices and other healthcare products, assess and take account of their environmental impact.
(2) The duty in subsection (1) includes consideration of environmental impacts arising from the manufacture, transport, use and disposal of those products, including their supply chains.
(3) The Secretary of State must issue guidance setting out standardised environmental information to be provided by manufacturers and suppliers for the purposes of subsection (1).
(4) The guidance under subsection (3) must, in particular, address—
(a) greenhouse gas emissions,
(b) the use of natural resources, including water and raw materials,
(c) pollution and waste arising from manufacture, use and disposal, and
(d) the environmental impacts of supply chains.
(5) The Secretary of State must publish a report on the implementation of this section within two years of its coming into force and at intervals of no more than three years thereafter.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to ensure that NHS procurement bodies assess and take account of the environmental impacts of medicines, medical devices and other healthcare products when making procurement decisions.
Opposition Amendment 257
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care) After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of clinical negligence legislation
The Secretary of State must within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish and lay before Parliament a review of the operation of section 2(4) of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948 in relation to clinical negligence cases.”
This amendment seeks to probe a review of section 2(4) of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act to ask judges to consider, when determining the level of compensation to be awarded to patients, the provisions provided via the NHS and whether claimants are utilising services for remedial treatment, as current legislation does not take into account the existence of the NHS.
None 258
Baroness Gerada (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Antisemitism, racism and extremism: duties of NHS bodies and annual report
(1) Each integrated care board, NHS trust and NHS foundation trust must, in the exercise of its functions, have regard to the need to—
(a) prevent antisemitism and other forms of racism affecting patients and staff,
(b) prevent conduct by persons working for or on behalf of the body which constitutes an offence under any of sections 11 to 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (offences relating to proscribed organisations), and
(c) respond effectively where antisemitic or racist conduct occurs, including by supporting patients and staff affected by it.
(2) The Secretary of State must, before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, and in each subsequent year, lay before Parliament a report on—
(a) how integrated care boards, NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts have discharged the duty in subsection (1),
(b) the incidences of antisemitism and other forms of racism reported by patients and staff in the health service in England, including in the NHS staff survey, with that information disaggregated by ethnicity and by religion or belief,
(c) how those bodies have discharged the duty in section 26 of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 (general duty on specified authorities), and
(d) progress in implementing the recommendations of the independent review of antisemitism and other forms of racism in the NHS and healthcare regulatory system, published in June 2026.
(3) In preparing a report under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care, and
(c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) In this section “NHS trust” and “NHS foundation trust” have the same meanings as in the National Health Service Act 2006.”
This new clause would require integrated care boards and NHS trusts to have regard to the need to prevent and respond to antisemitism, other forms of racism and support for proscribed organisations. The duty is intended complement the public sector equality duty and existing race equality standards.
None 259
Baroness Gerada (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Performers lists: suitability conditions
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement setting out whether the Secretary of State intends to amend the National Health Service (Performers Lists) (England) Regulations 2013 to enable conditions to be imposed on a practitioner’s inclusion in a performers list on grounds of suitability, including in cases of racist conduct or conduct constituting an offence under any of sections 11 to 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
(2) If the Secretary of State does not intend to make such amendments, the statement must give reasons.”
This amendment seeks to set out the government’s plans to implement recommendation 26 of the Lord Mann review, allowing conditions to be placed on primary care practitioners on suitability grounds, including racist or extremist conduct, not only on efficiency grounds.
Opposition Amendment 260
Baroness Cash (Con) - Shadow Minister (Education)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Single sex facilities
(1) The Secretary of State is required to ensure that there are single sex—
(a) changing rooms for NHS staff,
(b) toilets and washing facilities for NHS staff,
(c) wards for NHS patients, and
(d) toilets and washing facilities for NHS patients.
(2) The Secretary of State may make exemptions to the duty in subsection (1)(c) and (1)(d) where necessary for—
(a) children,
(b) intensive care units,
(c) critical care, and
(d) specialist high observation areas such as resuscitation in Accident and Emergency and the initial recovery area in theatres.”
This new clause creates a requirement for the Secretary of State to ensure certain single sex facilities are made available for NHS staff and patients. It provides exemptions in certain circumstances. It restates New Clause 143, divided upon in the House of Commons on 8 September 2026.
Opposition Amendment 261
Baroness Cash (Con) - Shadow Minister (Education)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Intimate examinations and intimate care: same-sex practitioners and chaperones
(1) A patient may request—
(a) that an intimate examination of the patient, or intimate care provided to the patient, be carried out by a practitioner of the same sex as the patient, and
(b) that any chaperone present be of the same sex as the patient,
and either or both requests may be made.
(2) A relevant NHS provider must meet each request so far as reasonably practicable, having regard to clinical urgency, patient safety and the availability of appropriately qualified staff.
(3) A patient need not give reasons for a request, and a request must not by itself be treated as a refusal of care.
(4) Where a request cannot be met, the provider must, unless immediate treatment makes this impracticable, explain why before the examination or care, discuss a clinically safe alternative time or provider where available, and respect applicable consent requirements.
(5) The provider must record each request, any decision not to meet it and the reasons, and must publish anonymised annual totals of requests not met, with appropriate small-number safeguards.
(6) The provider must hold only such information about the sex of practitioners as is necessary to respond to requests under this section, restrict access to it to authorised persons, and process and disclose it only where lawful and necessary.
(7) Nothing in this section requires the delay of treatment where delay would create a risk of death or serious harm, or authorises care without consent.
(8) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must report to Parliament on whether professional registers and employer records adequately support the safe handling of requests under this section, including the confidentiality and data-protection implications.
(9) In this section—
“intimate care” includes personal care involving washing, bathing, toileting or dressing, or such exposure or touching;
“intimate examination” means examination involving exposure or touching of the breasts, genitalia or rectum;
“practitioner” includes any person providing that examination or care;
“sex” has the same meaning as in the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16.”
This new clause gives every patient the right to request that intimate examinations and intimate care be carried out by a practitioner of the same sex, with a same-sex chaperone, to be met so far as reasonably practicable, and requires unmet requests to be explained, recorded and reported.
None 262
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Minimum expenditure on mental health
The Secretary of State must ensure that, in each financial year, expenditure on mental health services commissioned or provided as part of the health service in England is not less than 10 per cent of total expenditure on the health service in England for that year.”
None 263
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Minimum expenditure on primary care
The Secretary of State must ensure that, in each financial year, expenditure on primary care services commissioned or provided as part of the health service in England is not less than 12 per cent of total expenditure on the health service in England for that year.”
None 264
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Single sex provision of hospital accommodation
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that the provision of single-sex hospital accommodation, including wards and other sleeping accommodation, is organised on the basis of a patient’s biological sex.
(2) In this section, “biological sex” means the sex recorded at birth.
(3) NHS bodies must have regard to this section in the exercise of their functions.”
None 265
Baroness Sugg (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Implementation of the Women's Health Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 90 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a women's health implementation plan (the “implementation plan”) setting out how the commitments in the document entitled “The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England” published on 15 April 2026 (or any successor document) will be delivered.
(2) The implementation plan must include, in particular—
(a) a timetable for delivering simpler access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC),
(b) a trajectory for reducing the gynaecology waiting list and for reducing average diagnosis times for endometriosis,
(c) a plan for establishing the regional specialist centres for group-based women's health pathways, including contraception, heavy periods, auto-gynaecology and menopause, and
(d) measurable targets and milestones for each commitment in the strategy, including a baseline and timetable for delivery.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay the implementation plan before Parliament on the day it is published.
(4) In preparing the implementation plan, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
(b) the College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, and
(c) patient organisations representing women affected by the conditions addressed by the strategy.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a women's health implementation plan setting out how the commitments in the document entitled "The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England” will be delivered.
None 266
Lord Crisp (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Discussion of potential harms before prescribing antidepressants
(1) A registered healthcare professional must, before prescribing an antidepressant medicinal product to a patient—
(a) explain, in a manner appropriate to the patient’s age, needs and circumstances, the nature and intended purpose of the proposed treatment,
(b) discuss the reasonably foreseeable benefits, material risks and potential adverse effects of the medicinal product, including, where relevant, its effects on sexual function, sleep, emotional experience and the risk of increased suicidal thoughts or behaviour,
(c) explain the possibility of withdrawal symptoms or other difficulties associated with reducing or discontinuing the medicinal product, including the importance of seeking appropriate clinical advice before changing or stopping treatment,
(d) discuss reasonable alternative treatment options, including psychological therapies, other clinically appropriate interventions, and the option of declining or deferring medication where clinically appropriate,
(e) provide the patient with an opportunity to ask questions, express preferences and consider the information provide, and
(f) confirm, so far as reasonably practicable, that the patient has understood the material information relevant to the decision.
(2) The healthcare professional must take reasonable steps to ensure that the information provided is accessible and understandable to the patient and must allow reasonable time for consideration of the information, taking account of the patient’s circumstances and clinical needs.
(3) The healthcare professional must record in the patient’s clinical record—
(a) that the discussion of potential harms has taken place,
(b) the material benefits, risks and alternatives discussed,
(c) the patient's decision and any material preferences expressed, and
(d) any reasonable adjustments, additional support or further discussion required to facilitate informed decision-making.
(4) The requirements of this section apply whether the prescription is issued in primary care, secondary care, a community setting or another healthcare setting in which the medicinal product is prescribed.”
None 267
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Public Health Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the day on which this Act is passed to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities.
(2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must—
(a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership,
(b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership,
(c) be chaired by the Prime Minister, and
(d) meet once in each annual quarter.
(3) Under subsection (2)(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee's meetings each year.
(4) Each government department must publish an annual report on their department's consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government departments.
(5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee.
(6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
This new clause would establish a Public Health Committee and Health Creation Unit to promote public health and cross-government policy making.
None 268
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Commercial interests and integrity in health policy
(1) The Secretary of State must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the development and implementation of health policy is independent of undue commercial influence and serves the public interest.
(2) For the purposes of this section, undue commercial influence includes—
(a) attempts by a commercial entity to influence health policy in a manner that conflicts with the public interest,
(b) financial, contractual or other arrangements that create an actual or perceived conflict of interest for a person involved in health policy decision-making, and
(c) lobbying, sponsorship or partnership activity that could reasonably be expected to compromise the independence, integrity or impartiality of health policy.
(3) The Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament an annual report setting out—
(a) interactions between the Department of Health and Social Care and relevant NHS bodies on the one hand and commercial entities on the other hand relating to the development of health policy,
(b) the steps taken to identify, manage and mitigate conflicts of interest arising from those interactions, and
(c) any breaches of duties under this section and the action taken in response.
(4) Integrated care boards and other relevant NHS bodies must—
(a) maintain and publish registers of interests for members, officers and advisers involved in policy development, commissioning or procurement,
(b) ensure that persons with a material conflict of interest do not participate in relevant decisions unless the conflict has been effectively managed, and
(c) ensure that commissioning, procurement and partnership decisions are made in the interests of patients and the public, on the basis of relevant evidence and transparent criteria.
(5) The Secretary of State must issue statutory guidance on identifying commercial determinants of health, assessing and managing undue commercial influence, and ensuring transparency in commercial interactions relating to health policy.
(6) Relevant NHS bodies must have regard to the guidance issued under subsection (5).”
This amendment seeks to protect health policy from undue commercial influence by strengthening transparency, conflict-of-interest safeguards and public accountability in policy development, commissioning and procurement.
None 269
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health improvement plans
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare a health improvement plan within 12 months of the date on which this Act is passed.
(2) A “health improvement plan” is a plan for significantly improving the health of the nation in the period to which the plan relates.
(3) That period must be no shorter than 10 years and no longer than 20 years.
(4) A health improvement plan must set out the steps His Majesty’s Government intends to take to improve the provision of health services and overall quality of health of the nation in the period to which the plan relates.
(5) The Secretary of State must prepare a workforce plan alongside the health improvement plan.”
This is to put the Health Improvement Plan on a statutory footing, including the workforce plan with annual reporting and regular review.
None 270
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Annual reports on health improvement plans
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare annual reports on the implementation of the current health improvement plan under section (Health improvement plans).
(2) An annual report must—
(a) describe what has been done, in the period to which the report relates, to implement the health improvement plan, and
(b) consider whether the health of the nation and the provision of the service has, or particular aspects of it have, improved during that period.
(3) In considering the matters in subsection (2)(b)—
(a) all data and other information used to create the report must be published in full;
(b) the progress that has been made towards achieving any targets, or any relevant targets, included in the NHS constitution must be included, and
(c) the progress on the workforce plan produced under section (Health improvement plans) should be included.
(4) The first annual report on the first health improvement plan may relate to any 12 month period that includes the day on which this section comes into force.
(5) The first annual report on a subsequent health improvement plan must relate to the first 12 months of the period to which the plan relates.
(6) Subsequent annual reports on an health improvement plan must relate to the 12 month period immediately following the 12 month period to which the previous annual report relates.
(7) An annual report must be laid before Parliament before the end of the four month period beginning immediately after the last day of the period to which the report relates.”
This is to put the Health Improvement Plan on a statutory footing, including the workforce plan with annual reporting and regular review.
None 271
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Reviewing and revising health improvement plans
(1) The Secretary of State must review the current health improvement plan under section (Healthcare improvement plans) at least every five years.
(2) In reviewing a health improvement plan, the Secretary of State must consider—
(a) what has been done to implement the plan in the period since it was published, or (if it has been reviewed before) last reviewed,
(b) whether His Majesty’s Government should take further or different steps to improve the quality of health (compared to those set out in the plan) in the remainder of the period to which the plan relates.
(3) If as a result of a review the Secretary of State does not revise the health improvement plan, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement explaining that and the reasons for it.
(4) If as a result of a review the Secretary of State of State considers it appropriate to revise the plan as a result of the review, it must revise the plan within 6 months of that review.
(5) If as a result of a review the Secretary of State revises the health improvement plan, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament—
(a) the revised health improvement plan, and
(b) a statement explaining the revisions and the reasons for them.
(6) The period to which a revised plan relates must end at the same time as the period to which the plan it revises relates.
(7) The first review of the first health improvement plan must be completed by 31 May 2033.
(8) The first review of a subsequent health improvement plan must be completed before the end of the 5 year period beginning with the day on which it replaces the previous plan.
(9) Subsequent reviews of a health improvement plan must be completed before the end of the 5 year period beginning with the day on which the previous review was completed.
(10) The Secretary of State must publish the documents laid under subsection (3) or (5).
(11) A review is completed when the Secretary of State has laid and published the documents mentioned in subsection (3) or (5).
(12) References in this Act to a health improvement plan include a revised health improvement plan.”
This is to put the Health Improvement Plan on a statutory footing, including the workforce plan with annual reporting and regular review.
None 272
Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following Clause—
“Regulation of online fertility services
(1) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 5 (the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority) insert—
“5A Regulation of online fertility services
(1) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority shall be responsible for the licensing of organisations providing online fertility services in England and Wales.
(2) In this section “online fertility services” include related concierge services which provide non-clinical advice related to the provision of clinical services.
(3) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision regarding the arrangements for the licensing of organisations under subsection (1).”
(3) In section 45(4A) (provisions to which the affirmative procedure applies) after the entry for section 4A(5) or (11), insert—
“section 5A;””
This new clause would implement a recommendation of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to extend its regulatory remit to include organisations providing online fertility services.
None 273
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of the regulation and advertising of private diagnostic tests
(1) The Secretary of State must undertake a review of the regulation and advertising of diagnostic tests offered directly to consumers by private providers.
(2) The review must consider—
(a) the adequacy of existing arrangements for ensuring the accuracy and clinical validity of private diagnostic tests,
(b) whether advertising claims about the accuracy, reliability and clinical significance of test results are adequately substantiated,
(c) whether consumers are adequately informed about the limitations of tests and the risks of false positive and false negative results,
(d) the respective roles of the Care Quality Commission, the United Kingdom Accreditation Service, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the Advertising Standards Authority in protecting consumers in relation to at-home diagnostic tests, and
(e) whether changes made to the regulation of private testing services during the coronavirus pandemic have implications for the current regulatory framework.
(3) In conducting the review, the Secretary of State must consult relevant regulatory bodies, healthcare professionals and organisations representing patients and consumers.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish the findings of the review and any proposed action within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force.”
This new clause requires a review of the regulation and advertising of private diagnostic tests, including whether claims about their accuracy and clinical usefulness are supported by evidence.
None 274
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review on deaths related to antimicrobial resistant infection
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must conduct and publish a review into the number of yearly deaths in the UK which are related to antimicrobial resistant infection.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to conduct and publish a review into the number of yearly deaths in the UK which are related to antimicrobial resistant infection.
None 275
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Gender services: disclosure of data for research
(1) This section applies to any person providing, by or on behalf of the health service in England, assessment or treatment for gender dysphoria or gender incongruence to persons of any age (“a gender service provider”).
(2) A gender service provider must disclose to the persons conducting an approved study such information about persons referred to or treated by it as the persons conducting an approved study reasonably require for the purposes of the study, within such period as they reasonably specify.
(3) An “approved study” is—
(a) the data linkage study recommended by the Independent Review of Gender Identity Services for Children and Young People (published April 2024) (“the Cass study”), and
(b) any other study of the outcomes of assessment or treatment for gender dysphoria or gender incongruence which has received a favourable opinion from a research ethics committee and is commissioned by, or approved for the purposes of this section by, the Secretary of State.
(4) It is a condition of any contract to provide services to which this section applies that the provider complies with subsection (2).
(5) A disclosure required by subsection (2) does not breach any obligation of confidence owed by the provider, and is to be treated as necessary for compliance with a legal obligation for the purposes of data protection legislation.
(6) Information disclosed under this section must be pseudonymised so far as is consistent with the purposes of the study, may be disclosed only to the persons conducting the study, and may not be used for any other purpose.
(7) The Secretary of State must exercise the power conferred by section 22(5) of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 so as to secure that no disclosure required by subsection (2) for the purposes of an approved study constitutes an offence under that section.
(8) Where a person’s NHS number or other identifier has been changed in connection with a change of gender, the Secretary of State must ensure that records held under the former and current identifiers can be linked for the purposes of an approved study.
(9) In relation to the Cass study, the Secretary of State must—
(a) within three months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a timetable for its completion,
(b) ensure that it includes all persons who, before reaching the age of 25, were referred to or treated by the Gender Identity Development Service or any successor service for children and young people, or by any adult gender dysphoria service in England, and
(c) lay the Cass study’s findings before Parliament within three months of the day of its completion.
(10) Any function relating to the Cass study exercisable by NHS England immediately before its abolition is exercisable by the Secretary of State.
(11) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every six months thereafter until the Cass study is completed, and annually after that, lay before Parliament a report setting out—
(a) the progress of each approved study against its timetable,
(b) any gender service provider that has failed to comply with subsection (2), and the steps taken in response, and
(c) any legal, technical or data-access barrier to an approved study, and the steps taken to remove it.”
This new clause seeks to turn the Government’s expectation that gender clinics will share data into a legal duty. The clause requires every NHS-funded children’s and adult gender service to disclose pseudonymised data, extends the legal protection to every such study, requires the Cass study to be completed on a published timetable and requires six-monthly reports to Parliament.
None 276
Baroness Davies of Devonport (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Specialist detransition service
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the end of the period of two years beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, arrange for the provision of a specialist service for persons who wish to detransition (“the detransition service”).
(2) The detransition service must—
(a) be provided separately from any service which provides gender-related treatment,
(b) be available to any person who wishes to detransition, whether that person’s gender-related treatment (if any) was provided—
(i) by or on behalf of the health service in England,
(ii) by any other provider in the United Kingdom, or
(iii) by a provider outside the United Kingdom, including a provider operating online, and
(c) provide such psychological, medical, endocrine, surgical and other care as is appropriate to meet the needs of persons who wish to detransition, including care in relation to the physical effects of previous gender-related treatment.
(3) The Secretary of State must ensure that the detransition service records the following, in respect of each person who uses it and consents to the information being recorded for the purposes of this section—
(a) the reasons the person gives for wishing to detransition,
(b) the nature of any gender-related treatment the person received, the age at which they received it, and which of the descriptions in subsection (2)(b)(i) to (iii) applies to the provider of that treatment, and
(c) whether the person reports any concerns about assessment, diagnosis, the consideration of co-occurring conditions, the process of obtaining informed consent, or safeguarding as part of their experience.
(4) The Secretary of State must prepare a report and lay it before each House of Parliament before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which the detransition service begins to operate, and in each subsequent 12-month period, setting out—
(a) the number of persons who have used the detransition service,
(b) an aggregated analysis of the information recorded under subsection (3), and
(c) any recurring themes identified from information recorded under subsection (3)(c), and the steps the Secretary of State has taken or intends to take in response, including in relation to commissioning, guidance or regulation.
(5) A report under subsection (4) must not include information from which an individual patient, practitioner or provider could be identified.
(6) In this section—
“gender-related treatment” means any of the following, provided for the purpose of a gender transition: puberty-suppressing hormones; masculinising or feminising hormones; surgery;
“puberty-suppressing hormones” means gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues;
a person “wishes to detransition” if the person has undergone a social or medical gender transition and wishes to stop that transition, or to reverse, or receive care in respect of, its effects.”
This new clause requires a specialist detransition service within two years, separate from gender services and open to anyone regardless of where they were treated, as recommended by the Cass Review, with aggregated annual reporting to Parliament on the reasons people seek it and the lessons for commissioning and regulation.
Opposition Amendment 277
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) - Shadow Minister (Treasury)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Procurement by NHS bodies: patient care, resilience and the United Kingdom economy
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on procurement by and on behalf of NHS bodies.
(2) The report must set out how procurement policy applicable to NHS bodies supports, consistently with the United Kingdom’s international obligations—
(a) the provision of safe and effective care to patients,
(b) value for money, including whole-life value,
(c) the resilience and security of supply chains,
(d) opportunities for businesses operating in the United Kingdom, including small and medium-sized enterprises, and
(e) the creation and retention of employment, skills, manufacturing capacity and research capability in the United Kingdom.
(3) The report must explain how the matters in subsection (2) are addressed in relation to—
(a) the procurement of goods, works and services under the Procurement Act 2023,
(b) the arrangement of healthcare services under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023, and
(c) procurements undertaken centrally or collaboratively for or on behalf of one or more NHS bodies.
(4) The report must also assess whether environmental, social-value or other non-clinical procurement requirements—
(a) are proportionate to the subject matter and value of the contract,
(b) create barriers to participation by small and medium-sized enterprises,
(c) materially reduce competition or the resilience of supply, or
(d) risk delaying or reducing access to products or services required for patient care.
(5) In carrying out procurement, an NHS body must have regard to the need to secure safe and effective patient care, value for money and continuity of supply.
(6) In this section, “NHS body” means NHS England, an integrated care board, an NHS trust, an NHS foundation trust or a Special Health Authority.”
This probing amendment would require the Secretary of State to report on how NHS procurement supports patient care, value for money, resilient supply chains and economic activity in the United Kingdom, consistently with international procurement obligations. It would cover both procurement under the Procurement Act 2023 and the arrangement of healthcare services under the Provider Selection Regime.
None 278
Baroness Kidron (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health Data Research Service strategy
(1) Within six months of the day this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a Health Data Research Service strategy.
(2) The Health Data Research Service strategy must include proposals for—
(a) making all patient and public health data that is available for research and innovation either interoperable, or available in the same location;
(b) making new health data available for access quickly, including streamlined processes for data handling and cleaning, and real time public health data;
(c) establishing consistent standards for researcher approval to access health datasets, including across England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland;
(d) ensuring that data used by research and innovation improves patient care and provides fair value to the NHS;
(e) establishing proportionate standards and governance processes based upon—
(i) whether research has been conducted by organisations headquartered in the UK or abroad;
(ii) the location of those accessing patient and public health data;
(iii) the research and commercial profile of those accessing patient and public health data;
(iv) the risk profile of the data.
(f) ensuring transparency of how data will be used, including, but not limited to—
(i) transparency of process for patient and public approval;
(ii) mandatory reporting on outcomes of research;
(iii) logging of every data request;
(iv) safeguards to protect patients and the public;
(v) a strategy for promoting understanding of how patient data will be used for research and innovation;
(g) annual reporting on progress in patient care and technological developments from the use of Health Data Research Service data;
(h) accelerating deployment of research and innovation conducted using data from the Health Data Research Service.
(3) In preparing a strategy, the Secretary of State must give consideration to—
(a) patient privacy and existing data protection laws;
(b) the short and long-term costs to the NHS of providing high-quality patient care;
(c) the costs of conducting research and innovation;
(d) the strategic importance of the NHS to the UK’s national security;
(e) the fact that patient and public health data may be held by different organisations;
(f) how data from the single patient record could be integrated into the Health Data Research Service.
(4) The strategy must be laid before both Houses of Parliament upon publication.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to publish a strategy for the Health Data Research Service which explains how the service will address issues with researcher access to health data, whilst maintaining privacy and public trust.
None 279
Lord Bradley (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Mental Health Commissioner
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a Mental Health Commissioner, based within the Department of Health and Social Care.
(2) The functions of the Mental Health Commissioner must include—
(a) overseeing the implementation and operability of functions discharged by relevant bodies and persons regarding the provision of treatment, care, and detention of people with a mental disorder.
(b) overseeing the implementation and operability of functions discharged by relevant bodies and persons which relate to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Mental Health Act 2007 and the Mental Health Act 2025.
(3) The Mental Health Commissioner must publish an annual report which must assess—
(a) the quality of mental health care treatment provided by relevant services;
(b) the accessibility of mental health care treatment services;
(c) mental health service provision in the criminal justice system;
(d) inequalities in mental health care provision regarding protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010;
(e) the use and effectiveness of detention measures under the Mental Health Act 1983, including but not limited to Community Treatment Orders, for the purposes of therapeutic benefit outlined in section 1(2B) of that Act;
(f) challenges surrounding stigma of mental health conditions;
(g) the accessibility of advice and support to mental health service users, their families and carers on their legal rights;
(h) other issues deemed appropriate by the Mental Health Commissioner.
(4) In fulfilling their duties under subsection (2)(a), the Mental Health Commissioner may review, and monitor the operation of, arrangements falling within subsection (2) and (3) for the purpose of ascertaining whether, and to what extent, the arrangements are effective in promoting the principles in section 118(2B) of the Mental Health Act 1983.
(5) The person appointed as Commissioner must—
(a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role,
(b) have first-hand experience of working in mental health services, so far as reasonably possible, and
(c) not be a Member of Parliament.”
None 289
Lord Tarassenko (XB)Clause 88, page 65, line 19, after “Sections” insert “(NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy), (Duty as to UK suppliers and sovereign capability),”
This amendment would bring the new clauses on an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy and a duty as to UK suppliers and sovereign capability into force on Royal Assent, so the deadline for publishing the strategy runs from then and the supplier duty applies immediately to contracts involving NHS patient data.
None 92
Baroness Hollins (XB)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Mental health workforce sufficiency assessment by integrated care boards
(1) Each integrated care board must conduct a mental health workforce sufficiency assessment every two years to evaluate whether it has sufficient workforce resources to deliver services under this Act effectively.
(2) The assessment may include—
(a) an analysis of current workforce levels across all relevant mental health service areas;
(b) identification of mental health workforce shortfalls;
(c) an evaluation of the impact of mental health staff shortages on patient care and service delivery;
(d) proposals to address mental health workforce challenges.
(3) Integrated care boards may consult any relevant personnel or organisations they deem appropriate when conducting the assessment.
(4) Each integrated care board must publish a report outlining its findings upon completing the assessment.
(5) Each integrated care board must publish its first report under subsection (4) within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed.”
The amendment requires integrated care boards to produce a biennial report assessing their mental health workforce sufficiency, identifying shortages and proposing measures to address mental health workforce challenges in delivering services.
Opposition Amendment 101
Baroness Barker (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Voluntary Sector)After Clause 25, insert the following new Clause—
“Voluntary sector role in neighbourhood health plans
(1) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, a responsible local authority and integrated care board must take and demonstrate reasonable steps to ensure the plan is co-produced with meaningful involvement by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise sector in that area, including the development, design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the plan.
(2) In meeting the requirement under subsection (1) a local authority and integrated cared board must have regard to—
(a) organisations representing people with lived experience of health conditions,
(b) organisations working with an underserved or marginalised population, and
(c) the role of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in delivering community-based services.
(3) The responsible local authority and integrated care board must demonstrate how they have ensured ongoing and meaningful representation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations across the governance, decision-making and commissioning arrangements relating to neighbourhood health plans at all stages of the planning process.”
This new clause would require local authorities and integrated care boards to take and demonstrate reasonable steps to ensure neighbourhood health plans are co-produced with meaningful involvement by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise sector in the local area.
None 141
Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con)Clause 52, page 37, line 28, at end insert—
“(8) Regulations under this section must make provision for appropriately regulated healthcare providers to be eligible to access relevant patient information through the single patient record system for the purposes of providing direct patient care.
(9) Eligibility for access under subsection (8) must be determined by compliance with such clinical, regulatory, governance, cybersecurity and information assurance requirements as may be prescribed and must not be determined solely by—
(a) whether the provider delivers services under arrangements with the National Health Service, or
(b) whether healthcare services are delivered in person, remotely or through digital means.
(10) Access under subsection (8) must be subject to—
(a) access being limited to information reasonably required for the specific healthcare service being provided to the patient,
(b) compliance with applicable legal and professional requirements relating to confidentiality, data protection and the use of patient information for direct patient care,
(c) secure authentication, role-based access controls and comprehensive audit arrangements recording access to patient information and the purpose of such access,
(d) appropriate professional registration and regulatory oversight by any relevant statutory or professional regulator,
(e) arrangements enabling patients to view an accessible record of access to their information, including through the NHS App where technically practicable,
(f) such safeguards as may be prescribed in relation to particularly sensitive categories of health information, and
(g) safeguards ensuring that any patient controls relating to information sharing do not prevent access to information necessary for safe and effective direct patient care.
(11) Information obtained through access to the single patient record under this section may be used only for the provision of direct patient care and must not be used for commercial, underwriting, marketing or other secondary purposes except where authorised by law.
(12) Regulations under this section may make provision enabling eligible healthcare providers to contribute information relevant to the provision of direct patient care, subject to such governance and quality assurance requirements as may be prescribed.
(13) Nothing in this section requires access to be granted to any provider or healthcare professional who does not meet the requirements prescribed under regulations made under this section”
This amendment ensures that providers of care that sit outside the NHS, whether physical or digital, can have access to the single patient record so that they can best respond to the medical needs of a patient with complete information to make the best recommendation for their health.
None 186
Lord Scriven (LD)After Clause 69, insert the following new Clause—
“Health Services Safety Investigations Body: recommendations, monitoring and powers
(1) The Health and Care Act 2022 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 110(1) (investigation of incidents with safety implications)—
(a) in paragraph (a), after “health care services” insert “or adult social care services”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), after “patients” insert “or of persons receiving adult social care services”.
(3) After section 116 insert—
“116A Monitoring of recommendations by the Care Quality Commission
(1) The Care Quality Commission must monitor and review the implementation of recommendations contained in final reports published by the HSSIB under section 113, so far as those recommendations relate to—
(a) providers of health care services, or
(b) providers of adult social care services.
(2) The Care Quality Commission must integrate its assessment of the implementation of recommendations under subsection (1) into its exercise of functions under Chapter 3 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (quality of health and social care).
(3) The Care Quality Commission must publish an annual report on the implementation of recommendations made by the HSSIB by providers of health care services and adult social care services.
(4) For the purposes of exercising its functions under this section, the Care Quality Commission—
(a) may rely only on information contained in final reports published under section 113 or other publicly available information, and
(b) may not have access to, or require the disclosure of, any protected material.
116B Implementation of recommendations by the Secretary of State
(1) Where a final report published under section 113 contains a recommendation for action by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of State must, so far as is practicable, implement that recommendation.
(2) Within three months of the publication of the final report, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a plan setting out—
(a) the steps to be taken to implement the recommendation,
(b) the timetable for taking those steps, and
(c) where the Secretary of State considers that it is not practicable to implement the recommendation in full, the reasons for that view.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report setting out, for each recommendation under this section that has not been fully implemented—
(a) the progress made against the plan under subsection (2), and
(b) the reasons for any delay.”
(4) In section 135 (Interpretation of Part 4), at the appropriate place insert—
“adult social care services” means services which consist of or include the provision of social care, within the meaning of section 9(3) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to adults.”
This amendment would extend the remit of the Health Services Safety Investigations Body to adult social care, and require the Care Quality Commission to monitor providers’ implementation of its recommendations without access to protected material
None 246
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of clinic negligence model
(1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must set up a commission to review the current framework and process used by the NHS to respond to clinical negligence claims.
(2) The review under subsection (1) must consider proposals for improving the process and framework used by the NHS to respond to clinical negligence claims, including—
(a) reducing the time from incident to resolution,
(b) reducing legal costs for individuals and organisations, and
(c) providing support for patients and their families where an incident has occurred.
(3) The commission must consist of—
(a) an independent chair, and
(b) representative of patients, clinicians and legal entities.
(4) The commission must—
(a) complete its review within the period of 18 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, and
(b) publish a report which must be laid before Parliament.”
This amendment seeks to require a review of the current clinical negligence system, looking particularly into proposals for reducing legal costs and providing an improved resolution for patients.
None 247
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 23 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Cancer genomic testing and personalised medicines
(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service in England, the Secretary of State must take all reasonable steps to ensure that—
(a) timely and comprehensive molecular and genomic testing (including for rarer actionable drivers) is provided as a standard part of cancer diagnostic pathways,
(b) integrated care boards and NHS providers have appropriate tissue collection, processing and storage facilities to facilitate personalised treatments,
(c) integrated care boards and NHS providers put in place consistent operational arrangements for the safe and effective delivery of personalised cancer medicines, and
(d) regional and demographic variation in access to genomic testing, specialist cancer treatments and supporting data infrastructure is reduced.
(2) In discharging the duty under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must have regard to the objectives of the National Cancer Plan for England.”
This new clause would strengthen requirements on the Secretary of State to put in place timely, comprehensive molecular and genomic testing, to ensure integrated care boards put in place consistent operational arrangements for the delivery of personalised cancer treatments and to reduce regional and demographic variation, consistent with the National Cancer Plan’s goals.
None 248
Baroness Boycott (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Resilience to climate and environmental degradation risks
Each NHS trust and NHS foundation trust must publish plans setting out—
(a) an assessment of the risks to its premises, workforce and services from current and predicted impacts of climate change and environmental degradation, and
(b) details of plans to implement measures which can address those risks.”
None 249
Baroness Cass (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health improvement and health inequalities outcome targets for children
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make regulations made by statutory instrument to set long term outcome targets for improving the health of children in England and reducing inequalities in health between children in England, and
(b) publish a cross-government strategy to set out how the target set by regulations under paragraph (a) will be achieved.
(2) In preparing the strategy under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must consult any relevant bodies which they consider appropriate.
(3) A Minister of the Crown must have regard to the strategy when exercising functions of the Minister.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to set statutory long-term targets for improving children's health and reducing health inequalities, publish a cross-government strategy for meeting those targets, and secure parliamentary approval of the targets through the affirmative procedure.
None 250
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Lord Stevens of Birmingham (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Radiotherapy services: national planning and improvement
(1) The Secretary of State must exercise functions in relation to the health service in England with a view to securing effective arrangements for planning and delivering improvements to radiotherapy services.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Secretary of State must publish a national delivery programme, informed by an assessment of clinical need and service capacity, setting out measures to—
(a) improve access to radiotherapy services and reduce avoidable treatment delays,
(b) address shortfalls in workforce, equipment and treatment capacity, including geographical inequalities in access, and
(c) improve access to evidence-based modern radiotherapy techniques.
(3) The programme must identify the actions required, the bodies responsible for their delivery and the timescales for implementation.
(4) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for implementing the programme through the exercise of relevant statutory functions and keep the effectiveness of those arrangements under review.
(5) The programme may form part of the National Cancer Plan for England, or any successor plan, provided that the requirements of this section are met.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to secure effective arrangements for planning and delivering improvements to radiotherapy services, supported by a national delivery programme addressing access, waiting times, capacity and modern treatments.
None 251
Baroness Young of Old Scone (None)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, prepare and publish a national strategy for improving treatment, care and outcomes of persons living with inflammatory bowel disease.
(2) The strategy must—
(a) establish nationally consistent standards of care and performance measures, informed by nationally recognised clinical guidelines, quality standards and service specifications,
(b) set measurable objectives for improving patient outcomes and quality of life, supported by consistent data that enables comparison between areas and over time,
(c) promote workforce planning and training sufficient to meet the needs of persons living with inflammatory bowel disease, and
(d) address inequalities in access to care and outcomes.
(3) In preparing the strategy, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) persons living with inflammatory bowel disease and their carers,
(b) organisations representing persons living with inflammatory bowel disease,
(c) healthcare professionals with expertise in inflammatory bowel disease, and
(d) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) The Secretary of State must review and, if considered appropriate, revise the strategy at intervals not exceeding five years.
(5) In this section, “inflammatory bowel disease” includes Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and such related conditions as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations made by statutory instrument.
(6) Regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
The amendment seeks to establish a clear national framework for improving inflammatory bowel disease care, including an agreed set of standards and measures against which local performance can be assessed consistently.
None 290
Lord Lansley (Con)Clause 88, page 65, line 22, at end insert—
“(za) section (Cap on care costs) (cap on care costs);”
This amendment is consequential on my amendment inserting a new clause after Clause 57 to commence the cap on care costs under the Care Act 2014. It provides for that clause to be brought into force two months after Royal Assent.
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause- "Urban health equity (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy for reducing health inequalities in urban areas in England. (2) The strategy must address the effect on health of deprivation, air quality, housing and access to health services. (3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on progress in implementing the strategy."
After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause- "Specialised commissioning: children and young people (1) Before any decision to delegate, transfer or otherwise devolve responsibility for commissioning specialised services, the Secretary of State must have regard to- (a) the need for age-appropriate specialised services for children and young people, (b) the need for equitable access to those services across England, (c) the impact of the decision on the quality, safety, sustainability and clinical effectiveness of those services, (d) the effect of the small and geographically dispersed population of children and young people requiring those services, (e) the impact on patients from Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland who use those services in England, and (f) the benefits of retaining national commissioning or oversight where this supports sufficient patient volumes, clinical expertise, service standards or equitable access. (2) Before making a decision under subsection (1) that relates to specialised services for children and young people, the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment setting out the likely effect on - (a) access to services, (b) clinical outcomes and patient experience, (c) health inequalities, (d) clinical expertise and service sustainability, (e) service integration and continuity of care, (f) patients, families and carers, and (g) the quality, consistency and equity of services. (3) In preparing an impact assessment under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including children and young people who use specialised services, their families and carers, clinicians, and relevant provider and support organisations. (4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on the provision, accessibility, quality and outcomes of specialised services for children and young people. (5) In this section- "children and young people" means persons under the age of 25; "specialised services" means services commissioned under regulations made under section 3B of the National Health Service Act 2006 (regulation-making power to require Secretary of State to commission services)."
After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause- "Sight tests: people with learning disabilities In regulation 3(1) of the Primary Ophthalmic Services Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/1186) (sight tests: eligibility) - (a) at the end of paragraph (h), omit "or", (b) at the end of paragraph (i), for the full stop substitute "; or", and (c) after paragraph (i) insert- "(j) who is eligible for registration as having a learning disability with their GP or is already registered as having a learning disability with their GP.""
Schedule 1, page 72, line 30, at end insert - "(5) After subsection (2) insert- "(2A) Eligibility for, and the scope of, the sight-testing service mentioned in subsection (2), and the fees payable for it, must be set nationally by the Secretary of State, and an integrated care board may not vary them in its area."
Schedule 1, page 73, line 6, at end insert- "116C Primary ophthalmic services for people with learning disabilities The Secretary of State must- (a) assess, or make arrangements for the assessment of, the need for primary ophthalmic services among people with learning disabilities, (b) direct integrated care boards to commission primary ophthalmic services to meet those needs, and (c) monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of those services."
Schedule 1, page 72, line 30, at end insert - "(5) After subsection (2) insert- "(2A) Eligibility for, and the scope of, the sight-testing service mentioned in subsection (2), and the fees payable for it, must be set nationally by the Secretary of State, and an integrated care board may not vary them in its area.'"
Schedule 1, page 73, line 6, at end insert- "116C Primary ophthalmic services for people with learning disabilities The Secretary of State must- (a) assess, or make arrangements for the assessment of, the need for primary ophthalmic services among people with learning disabilities, (b) direct integrated care boards to commission primary ophthalmic services to meet those needs, and (c) monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of those services."
Clause 16, page 12, line 22, at end insert - "(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must make provision for enabling people to choose the provider of appropriate non-consultant-led community services, including- (a) optometry-led monitoring and management of low-risk glaucoma, and (b) community urgent eye care services. (4) The Secretary of State must keep under review the services to which regulations under subsection (1) apply, with a view to extending patient choice for care in the community."
After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause- "Reservation and prioritisation of contracts for the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector (1) In exercising their commissioning functions, integrated care boards must take reasonable steps to secure the participation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in the provision of services. (2) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument enable integrated care boards to reserve and prioritise contracts to be delivered by voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations as part of their commissioning process. (3) Circumstances in which contracts may be appropriate to be reserved and prioritised under subsection (2) include - (a) services that are, or could be, community-based, (b) services that are intended to reach populations that are underserved, marginalised, or experiencing health inequalities, or (c) where voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations are best placed to deliver person-centred or culturally competent care. (4) In exercising functions under this section, integrated care boards must have regard to- (a) the need to reduce health inequalities, (b) the importance of securing equitable access to services across different areas, and (c) the sustainability of voluntary, community and social enterprise provision. (5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause - "Patient choice: onward referrals by virtual and integrated health services (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument make provision to ensure that a patient who is referred onward by a designated health service body to a provider for elective care or treatment is offered the same choices in respect of that referral as would apply if the referral had been made by a general practitioner, dentist or optometrist. (2) Regulations under subsection (1) must in particular ensure that a designated health service body - (a) does not maintain a closed list of preferred providers for onward referrals which excludes providers that would otherwise be available to patients under the NHS choice framework, (b) does not direct a patient to a particular provider for elective care without first offering the patient the opportunity to exercise their right to choice, and (c) has access to the NHS e-Referral Service, or any successor system, for the purpose of facilitating patient choice in respect of onward referrals. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament. (4) In this section- "designated health service body" means - (a) an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust, (b) a body designated by the Secretary of State as providing virtual care or triage services to NHS patients in England, or (c) a body designated by the Secretary of State as an integrated healthcare organisation or organisation of equivalent description; "onward referral" means a referral made by a designated health service body to another provider for the purposes of the patient receiving further investigation, treatment or care."
Clause 22, page 16, line 19, at end insert- "(2A) The constitution must also provide for the ordinary members appointed as mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(b) to include at least one member nominated jointly by providers of primary care services in the integrated care board's area, including providers of primary ophthalmic services, and must set out the process for that nomination."
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause - "Quality and outcomes for people living with inflammatory bowel disease (1) Each integrated care board must monitor and assess variation in the quality of care, access to services and outcomes for people living with inflammatory bowel disease within its area. (2) In carrying out an assessment under subsection (1), an integrated care board must assess its performance against the national standards and measures established under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease). (3) For each financial year, an integrated care board must publish a report on its performance against the national standards and measures established under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease), including any unwarranted variation identified within its area and the action taken or proposed to reduce it. (4) In this section, "inflammatory bowel disease" includes Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and such related conditions as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations made under section (National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease). (5) The first report under this section must be published within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force, and subsequent reports must be published annually."
Clause 25, page 18, line 22, at end insert - "(4A) Any guidance issued by the Secretary of State under subsection (4) must include provision on - (a) identifying unmet need and unwarranted variation in access to services for people with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions, (b) establishing appropriate clinical pathways, including access to specialist advice and arrangements for referral or escalation where necessary, (c) assessing the workforce and service capacity required to meet identified needs, and (d) specifying the responsibilities of partner organisations, measurable objectives and arrangements for monitoring progress, using existing reporting mechanisms where appropriate."
Clause 52, page 36, line 16, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
Clause 52, page 36, line 17, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert - "(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding."
Clause 48, page 33, line 14, after "(1)" insert "or (2A)".
Clause 48, page 33, line 37, at end insert - "(f) require the integrated care board to use a portion of designated amount for the provision of social care services and support for the physical and mental health and wellbeing of unpaid carers."
After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause- "Primary care investment standard (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards. (2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year. (3) Regulations under this section may make provision about- (a) the description of services that constitute "primary care services" for the purposes of this section; (b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced; (c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
Clause 52, page 36, line 16, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
Clause 52, page 36, line 17, after "received", insert "publicly funded"
Clause 52, page 36, line 18, after "of" insert "publicly funded"
Clause 52, page 36, line 19, at end insert - "(1A) The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers."
Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert - "(2A) The regulations must make provision for- (a) persons providing optometry services to have access to relevant patient information through the system, (b) the system to be interoperable with the digital systems used by such persons, and (c) persons providing optometry services to be represented in the governance and implementation of the system."
Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert- "(2A) The regulations must provide that any patient may opt out of all or any information relating to them being included in the system."
Clause 52, page 37, line 14, after "condition" insert ", and includes optometry services, including primary ophthalmic services"
Clause 52, page 37, line 23, at end insert- ""publicly funded" care includes care which is partly funded out of public funds;"
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause- "Single patient record: review of data minimisation (1) Before making regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (single patient record), the Secretary of State must undertake a review of- (a) the patient information to be provided to or processed through the system established under that section, (b) the identifiable patient information to be held by suppliers, contractors, partners and service providers whose information or services will be used to establish, populate or operate the system, (c) whether that identifiable patient information can be anonymised, pseudonymised or processed using a unique identifier before it is disclosed to or processed by those persons, (d) the periods for which identifiable patient information will be retained by those persons, (e) whether the establishment of the system will result in unnecessary duplication of identifiable patient information, and (f) the cybersecurity risks of the unnecessary retention, disclosure or duplication of identifiable patient information. (2) The review must make recommendations for reducing the amount of identifiable patient information held by persons participating in the system and increasing the use of anonymisation, pseudonymisation and unique identifiers. (3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report setting out the findings and recommendations of the review."
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause - "Protection of confidential psychological therapy records (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument provide for safeguards governing the inclusion of information relating to psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies in the single patient record. (2) The regulations must provide that detailed narrative records of psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies may not be routinely disclosed through the single patient record to health or social care professionals unless the patient has given explicit and informed consent to the disclosure. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply where disclosure is necessary to address an immediate risk to the life, safety or wellbeing of the patient or another person. (4) Any disclosure under subsection (3) must be limited to the information reasonably necessary for that purpose, and the reasons for the disclosure must be recorded. (5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause- "National respite care scheme (1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a national respite care scheme. (2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for - (a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer under any enactment for the time being in force in England, an assessment by the local authority of whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities; (b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to - (i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing, (ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and (iii) participate in family and community life; (c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring. (3) Under subsection (2), "support" may include- (a) replacement care for the cared-for person; (b) respite services; (c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support. (4) The Secretary of State must provide sufficient support to local authorities to ensure the scheme under subsection (1) is delivered in every local authority. (5) For the purposes of this section, "unpaid carer" means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work."
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "Functions of the Commissioner (1) The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England must promote improvements in maternity and neonatal care in England.
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause - "NHS mental health workforce plan (1) Within 12 months of the publication of the first NHS workforce plan since the 2023 NHS workforce plan, the Secretary of State must publish a follow-up mental health workforce plan. (2) The plan should include but not be limited to detail on- (a) how the mental health workforce will be effectively retained and recruited to meet the scale of the mental health demand, including for people with learning disabilities and autistic people; (b) investment required to achieve the commitments in the plan. (3) The Secretary of State must produce an annual report to Parliament on the achievements made in delivering the plan."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Health and care workforce strategy (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health and care workforce strategy for England. (2) The strategy must set out- (a) an assessment of the number of staff, including registered nurses and primary care practitioners, needed to meet current and projected demand for health and care services, and (b) a funded plan to close any gap between that number and the staff available. (3) In this section "primary care practitioners" includes general practitioners, dentists, optometrists and pharmacists. (4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on progress in implementing the strategy."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England (1) No regulations may be made under section 88 (commencement) bringing section 1 into force unless the Secretary of State has published, and laid before Parliament, a statement under this section. (2) A statement under this section must set out - (a) how each function exercised by NHS England in relation to the assessment, diagnosis, treatment and support of autistic people and people with ADHD will be exercised following the abolition of NHS England, and by which person or body, (b) how the functions exercised by NHS England in connection with its national programme for people with a learning disability and autistic people will be exercised following that abolition, and by which person or body, (c) the senior officer of the Department of Health and Social Care with lead responsibility for the matters in paragraphs (a) and (b), and (d) how the Secretary of State will monitor, and report to Parliament on, waiting times for autism and ADHD assessment. (3) In this section- "ADHD" means attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; "autistic people" includes people with any autism spectrum condition."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Autism and ADHD: publication of information and prevalence surveys (1) The Secretary of State must publish information about the assessment of autism and ADHD in England, including- (a) the number of people referred for an autism assessment, and the number of people referred for an ADHD assessment, who are waiting for that assessment, (b) the length of time for which those people have been waiting, and (c) information disaggregated by integrated care board area, age group and sex. (2) Information under subsection (1) must be published - (a) at intervals no longer than those at which equivalent information was published by NHS England immediately before the day on which section 1 comes into force, and (b) in a form which allows comparison with the information published by NHS England before that day. (3) The Secretary of State must arrange for surveys to be carried out to estimate the prevalence of autism and ADHD among children and adults in England. (4) The first survey under subsection (3) must be commissioned within two years of the day on which this Act is passed and further surveys must be commissioned at intervals of not more than five years. (5) The Secretary of State must publish the results of each survey under subsection (3) and lay a copy before Parliament. (6) In this section "ADHD" means attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and "autism" includes any autism spectrum condition."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Treatment at sporting and cultural events (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by regulations made by statutory instrument establish an exception from registration under Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (registration in respect of provision of health or social care) for the provision of treatment of disease, disorder or injury by a listed healthcare professional where - (a) the treatment is provided to - (i) an athlete or performer, or (ii) a person providing essential support to an athlete or performer, (b) the treatment is provided in connection with preparation for, travel to or from, or participation in a sporting competition, sporting event or cultural performance, (c) the healthcare professional is registered with the professional regulator relevant to their profession, (d) the treatment is provided in accordance with relevant quality and clinical governance standards recognised by the Secretary of State, and (e) the healthcare professional has notified the Care Quality Commission that they intend to operate under the exception. (2) For the purposes of this section, "athlete" includes - (a) a professional or elite athlete; (b) an amateur athlete; (c) a child or young person participating in sport; (d) a person participating in a grassroots, community, school or recreational sporting competition or event. (3) Regulations under subsection (1) must make provision in relation to- (a) elite and professional competitions and performances, (b) amateur and non-elite competitions and performances, (c) grassroots and community sporting events, (d) school and youth sporting events, and (e) competitions and events involving disabled athletes or performers. (4) The standards recognised under subsection (1)(d) must include standards relating to- (a) safeguarding, including the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults, (b) clinical governance, (c) professional competence, (d) indemnity, (e) medicines management, (f) record keeping, and (g) emergency escalation. (5) The Care Quality Commission must maintain a register of listed healthcare professionals who have notified it under subsection (1)(e). (6) Entry in the register under subsection (5) - (a) does not constitute registration under Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and (b) may be suspended or removed where the Care Quality Commission is satisfied that the professional no longer meets the conditions in subsection (1). (7) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult - (a) the Care Quality Commission, (b) relevant professional regulators, (c) national governing bodies for sport and cultural activities, (d) bodies representing sport and exercise medicine and pre-hospital care, and (e) bodies representing grassroots, community, school and youth sport. (8) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
Clause 88, page 65, line 27, at end insert ", subject to the provisions of section (Autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England) (autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England)."
Clause 88, page 65, line 27, at end insert ", subject to the provisions of section (Autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England) (autism, ADHD and learning disabilities: responsibility following abolition of NHS England)."
Clause 6, page 4, line 20, at end insert- "(5) The Secretary of State must establish a transformational fund, within a year of the date on which the Health Act 2026 is passed, to enable improvements in access to specialist palliative care and its support to generalist services."
LORD PATEL
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Con)Clause 7, page 4, line 31 at end insert- "(1A) The Secretary of State must publish an independently verified long-term assessment of the workforce needs of the health service and a ten year education and training plan to deliver on those needs. (1B) The first assessment and plan under subsection (1A) must be published within one month of the day on which this Act is passed. (1C) The Secretary of State must keep the assessment and plan under review and revise both at least once every five years."
Clause 16, page 12, line 10, at end insert- "(3) Regulations must impose duties on integrated care boards with respect to waiting times for treatments or other services provided to children which they arrange in the exercise of their commissioning functions. (4) Regulations under subsection (3) must include provision as to the arrangements integrated care boards must make where a specified treatment or other specified service for a child is not provided within a specified period. (5) The first regulations under subsection (3) must be made before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 16 of the Health Act 2026 comes into force. (6) In this section “child” means a person under the age of 18."
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause— “Single patient record: right to opt out of use for purposes other than direct care (1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must enable a patient to opt out of information relating to them which is made available through the system established under those regulations being used for any purpose other than their direct care. (2) The regulations must enable a patient to opt out, or to withdraw an opt-out, at any time and free of charge – (a) through their GP practice, (b) electronically, or (c) by other means accessible to persons without internet access. (3) The regulations may not permit an opt-out to be overridden except where required by an order of a court or where necessary to protect the patient’s life.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause— “Single patient record: access logs and audit (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that a record is kept of each occasion on which patient information is accessed or otherwise processed by means of the system established under regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) (“the single patient record”), setting out— (a) the person or organisation by whom it was accessed or processed, (b) the date and time it was accessed or processed, (c) the information accessed or processed, and (d) the purpose for which it was accessed or processed. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a patient is able to view, free of charge and by electronic means, the record kept under subsection (1) in relation to information about them. (3) The Secretary of State must publish, at least once every three months, a register of each disclosure of patient information obtained from or derived from the single patient record for purposes other than direct care, including research, setting out— (a) the recipient, (b) the purpose, (c) the legal basis for the disclosure, (d) whether the information disclosed was identifiable, pseudonymised or anonymised, and (e) the date of the disclosure and the period for which the information may be retained. (4) The Secretary of State must arrange for an independent audit, at least once in each financial year, of access to and processing of patient information by means of the single patient record, and must lay a report of each audit before Parliament.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause— “Single patient record: sexual and reproductive health information (1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must not require or authorise information relating to the provision of sexual and reproductive health services to a patient to be made available through the system established under those regulations, unless the patient has given explicit consent. (2) A patient may withdraw consent given under subsection (1) at any time. (3) In this section “sexual and reproductive health services” includes – (a) testing for and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, (b) contraception, and (c) the termination of pregnancy.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause— “Right to receive sexual health services anonymously (1) A person seeking testing for, or treatment of, HIV or any other sexually transmitted infection from a sexual health service must not be required, as a condition of receiving that service, to give their name or any other information which identifies them. (2) Information identifying a person who receives a service under subsection (1) must not be disclosed without that person’s consent, except where necessary to prevent a serious risk of harm to the person or to others.”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Retention of NHS number on following adoption (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person’s NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a person’s health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made. (3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to— (a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and (b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent. (4) In this section— “adoption order” has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; “health record” has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018; “NHS number” has the same meaning as “consistent identifier” in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012.”
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause— “Cap on care costs (1) Sections 15 (cap on care costs) and 16 (cap on care costs: annual adjustment) of the Care Act 2014 come into force at the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed. (2) The Secretary of State must make regulations under section 15(4) of the Care Act 2014 to take effect no later than 12 months after the entry into force of sections 15 and 16 of the Care Act 2014.”
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause— “Integrated personal health and care budgets (1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows. (2) After section 12DB (inserted by Schedule 12 to this Act) insert – “12DC Right to an integrated personal health and care budget (1) This section applies where— (a) The Secretary of State or an integrated care board (‘the relevant NHS body’) is responsible for arranging the provision to an adult of one or more community-based health services, (b) the relevant NHS body has identified an amount which is sufficient to secure the provision of those services in accordance with an agreed care plan, and (c) a local authority is required, or has decided, to meet needs of that adult under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014 and the adult has a personal budget under section 26 of that Act. (2) The adult, or an authorised representative acting on the adult’s behalf, may request that the amounts available from the relevant NHS body and the local authority be provided as an integrated personal health and care budget. (3) Where a request is made under subsection (2), the relevant NHS body and the local authority must— (a) grant the request unless one of the grounds in subsection (8) applies; (b) prepare, with the adult or authorised representative, a single personalised health and care plan; (c) identify in that plan— (i) the adult’s assessed health needs and care and support needs; (ii) the outcomes which the arrangements are intended to achieve; (iii) the amount to be provided by the relevant NHS body; (iv) the amount to be provided by the local authority; (v) any amount which the adult is required to pay following a financial assessment under the Care Act 2014; and (vi) the total amount of the integrated personal health and care budget; (d) designate one of them as the lead body responsible for administering the budget; and (e) establish a single system for payment, management, monitoring and review of the budget. (4) An integrated personal health and care budget may be managed by – (a) a direct payment to the adult or an authorised representative, (b) a direct payment to a person nominated by the adult or authorised representative, (c) a managed account administered by a person or body independent of the relevant NHS body and the local authority, (d) a notional budget administered by the lead body in accordance with the personalised health and care plan, or (e) a combination of the arrangements in paragraphs (a) to (d). (5) The relevant NHS body and the local authority must give effect to the adult’s preferred method of management under subsection (4), except to the extent that a ground in subsection (8) applies. (6) Amounts comprised in an integrated personal health and care budget may be applied to any service, support, item or arrangement specified in the personalised health and care plan where the bodies are satisfied that it will contribute to meeting one or more of the needs or outcomes specified in that plan. (7) Expenditure under subsection (6) need not be classified exclusively as expenditure on health care or on care and support, but the personalised health and care plan must make provision sufficient to meet all the needs which the relevant NHS body and the local authority are respectively required to meet. (8) A request, or a preferred method of managing the budget, may be refused only where— (a) the proposed arrangement would be unlawful, (b) it would give rise to a material risk to the health, safety or welfare of the adult or another person which cannot reasonably be mitigated, (c) the adult, authorised representative or nominee would be unable to manage the arrangement safely or effectively notwithstanding any support which could reasonably be provided, (d) the requested arrangement relates to a service which regulations expressly exclude from integrated personal budgets, or (e) the proposed expenditure would not contribute to meeting a need or outcome specified in the personalised health and care plan. (9) Where a request is refused in whole or in part, the relevant NHS body and the local authority must— (a) give the adult and any authorised representative written reasons, (b) identify any alternative arrangement which they propose, (c) inform them of the right to require a review, and (d) continue to secure the services required to meet the adult’s assessed needs while the review is determined. (10) A review under subsection (9) must— (a) be undertaken by a person who was not involved in the original decision, (b) involve the adult and any authorised representative, (c) be completed within the prescribed period, and (d) result in a written decision with reasons. (11) Nothing in this section – (a) transfers from the relevant NHS body or the local authority responsibility for any function or duty for which that body is otherwise responsible, (b) permits a charge to be imposed for any service which must be provided free of charge as part of the health service, (c) permits an amount payable by the relevant NHS body to be taken into account as resources of the adult for the purposes of a financial assessment under the Care Act 2014, (d) permits either body to reduce the amount it would otherwise be required to provide solely because the other body is contributing to the integrated budget, or (e) affects the right of the adult to have services arranged directly instead of receiving or managing a personal budget. (12) To the extent that an integrated personal health and care budget consists of— (a) NHS funding, a payment made under this section is to be treated as a direct payment under section 12A; (b) money payable by a local authority to meet needs under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014, the payment is to be treated as a direct payment under section 31 or 32 of that Act, as appropriate. (13) In this section “authorised representative” means – (a) where the adult has capacity to make the relevant decision, a person whom the adult has authorised to act on the adult’s behalf, (b) a donee of a lasting power of attorney, or a deputy appointed by the Court of Protection, who has authority to make the relevant decision, (c) a person nominated by the adult before the adult lost capacity to make the relevant decision, or (d) where there is no person within paragraphs (b) or (c), a suitable person approved jointly by the relevant NHS body and the local authority to act in the adult’s best interests. (14) An authorised representative may nominate a person or organisation to administer a managed account where the authorised representative does not have authority, or does not wish, personally to receive and manage the money. (15) In this section “community-based health services” means health services arranged for an adult in the adult’s home or in a community setting, including— (a) NHS Continuing Healthcare, (b) community nursing, therapy, rehabilitation and mental-health services, (c) equipment and other support required to enable the adult to live in the community, and (d) such other services as may be prescribed. (16) The Secretary of State must make regulations providing for— (a) the period within which a request must be determined and implemented, (b) the calculation and sufficiency of the NHS contribution, (c) support for adults and authorised representatives in preparing and managing a budget, (d) monitoring, review, audit and recovery of payments, (e) resolution of disputes between responsible bodies without interruption to the adult’s care, and (f) the limited descriptions of service which may be excluded under subsection (8)(d).” (3) In section 75 of the National Health Service Act 2006, after subsection (3) insert- “(3A) Regulations under this section must make provision enabling NHS bodies and local authorities to discharge their duties under section 12DC. (3B) The absence of arrangements under this section does not relieve an NHS body or local authority of a duty imposed by section 12DC. יי
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause— “Consequential amendments to the Care Act 2014 (1) The Care Act 2014 is amended as follows. (2) In section 25, after subsection (2) insert- “(2A) Where section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006 applies, the requirements of this section may be satisfied by a single personalised health and care plan prepared under that section.” (3) For section 26(3) substitute – “(3) Where section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006 applies, the personal budget must— (a) specify the amount of NHS money available in the adult’s case, (b) form part of the integrated personal health and care budget prepared under that section, and (c) identify separately the amounts provided by the local authority, the relevant NHS body and the adult. (3A) In any other case, a personal budget may specify other amounts of public money available in the adult’s case, including amounts relating to housing, healthcare or welfare.” (4) In sections 31 and 32, after subsection (3) insert- “(3A) Where a direct payment forms part of an integrated personal health and care budget under section 12DC of the National Health Service Act 2006, the local authority must coordinate the payment, account, conditions and review arrangements with the relevant NHS body and must not require a separate account or administrative process unless this is necessary for the protection of the adult. """
After Clause 69, insert the following new Clause— “Health Services Safety Investigations Body: recommendations, monitoring and powers (1) The Health and Care Act 2022 is amended as follows. (2) In section 110(1) (investigation of incidents with safety implications) – (a) in paragraph (a), after “health care services” insert “or adult social care services”, and (b) in paragraph (b), after “patients” insert “or of persons receiving adult social care services”. (3) After section 116 insert- “116A Monitoring of recommendations by the Care Quality Commission (1) The Care Quality Commission must monitor and review the implementation of recommendations contained in final reports published by the HSSIB under section 113, so far as those recommendations relate to— (a) providers of health care services, or (b) providers of adult social care services. (2) The Care Quality Commission must integrate its assessment of the implementation of recommendations under subsection (1) into its exercise of functions under Chapter 3 of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (quality of health and social care). (3) The Care Quality Commission must publish an annual report on the implementation of recommendations made by the HSSIB by providers of health care services and adult social care services. (4) For the purposes of exercising its functions under this section, the Care Quality Commission— (a) may rely only on information contained in final reports published under section 113 or other publicly available information, and (b) may not have access to, or require the disclosure of, any protected material. 116B Implementation of recommendations by the Secretary of State (1) Where a final report published under section 113 contains a recommendation for action by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of State must, so far as is practicable, implement that recommendation. (2) Within three months of the publication of the final report, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a plan setting out— (a) the steps to be taken to implement the recommendation, (b) the timetable for taking those steps, and (c) where the Secretary of State considers that it is not practicable to implement the recommendation in full, the reasons for that view. (3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report setting out, for each recommendation under this section that has not been fully implemented – (a) the progress made against the plan under subsection (2), and (b) the reasons for any delay.” (4) In section 135 (Interpretation of Part 4), at the appropriate place insert – “adult social care services” means services which consist of or include the provision of social care, within the meaning of section 9(3) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to adults.”
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause— “Powers for coroners and medical examiners to review suspected failings in obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care (1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, establish a standard mechanism whereby coroners and medical examiners must review cases of deaths, bought to them by patients, medical staff or other relevant whistleblowers, where there are suspected failings in the provision of obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care. (2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to review cases using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings or clinical negligence in a health care setting. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "Health Service Commissioner In section 1 of the Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 (the Commissioner), after subsection (1) insert— "(1A) The office of Health Service Commissioner for England cannot be held by the person who holds the office of Parliamentary Commissioner (as defined by the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967). """
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "Powers for coroners and medical examiners to review suspected failings in obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care (1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, establish a standard mechanism whereby coroners and medical examiners must review cases of deaths, bought to them by patients, medical staff or other relevant whistleblowers, where there are suspected failings in the provision of obstetric, neonatal and paediatric care. (2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to review cases using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings or clinical negligence in a health care setting. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 22 Oct 2026The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Schedule 11 be the eleventh Schedule to the Bill.
After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause- "Infant feeding bottles: materials (1) A relevant NHS body must, when procuring or supplying infant feeding bottles for use by infants in its care, procure or supply bottles which are not made wholly or partly of plastic. (2) The duty in subsection (1) does not apply where the responsible clinician considers that the use of a bottle not made of plastic would be contrary to the clinical interests of a particular infant. (3) A relevant NHS body satisfies the duty in subsection (1) by procuring or supplying bottles the container of which is made of a safe alternative material. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations specify a material as a safe alternative material, or remove a material previously so specified, but may only specify a material where satisfied, on the basis of the best available scientific and clinical evidence and applying a precautionary approach, that in normal conditions of use the material does not release into the contents of the bottle— (a) microplastic particles, (b) bisphenols or their derivatives, (c) phthalates or other plasticisers, or (d) any other substance having endocrine-disrupting properties, in quantities which may pose a risk to the health of an infant. (5) In subsection (4), "normal conditions of use" includes sterilisation, the preparation of feed with water at temperatures used in clinical and domestic settings, repeated washing, and the expected service life of the bottle. (6) The Secretary of State must make the first regulations under subsection (4) within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force. (7) Before making regulations under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must consult— (a) the United Kingdom Health Security Agency, (b) the Food Standards Agency, (c) the Health and Safety Executive, (d) such organisations representing paediatric, neonatal and maternity clinicians as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and (e) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (8) The Secretary of State must issue guidance to relevant NHS bodies about the discharge of the duty in subsection (1), including guidance on cleaning, sterilisation and safe handling, and a relevant NHS body must have regard to that guidance. (9) Within 12 months of the day on which this section comes into force, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on compliance with the duty in subsection (1), including an estimate of the number of infant feeding bottles procured or supplied by relevant NHS bodies in the reporting period and the materials of which they were made. (10) In this section— "infant" means a child under the age of 24 months; "infant feeding bottle" means the container from which an infant is fed, and does not include the teat, valve or collar; "relevant NHS body" means— (a) an integrated care board, (b) an NHS trust, or (c) an NHS foundation trust; "responsible clinician" means the registered medical practitioner or registered nurse with responsibility for the care of the infant"
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Review of clinic negligence model (1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must set up a commission to review the current framework and process used by the NHS to respond to clinical negligence claims. (2) The review under subsection (1) must consider proposals for improving the process and framework used by the NHS to respond to clinical negligence claims, including- (a) reducing the time from incident to resolution, (b) reducing legal costs for individuals and organisations, and (c) providing support for patients and their families where an incident has occurred. (3) The commission must consist of- (a) an independent chair, and (b) representative of patients, clinicians and legal entities. (4) The (a) commission must- complete its review within the period of 18 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, and (b) publish a report which must be laid before Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Cancer genomic testing and personalised medicines (1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service in England, the Secretary of State must take all reasonable steps to ensure that - (a) (b) (c) (d) timely and comprehensive molecular and genomic testing (including for rarer actionable drivers) is provided as a standard part of cancer diagnostic pathways, integrated care boards and NHS providers have appropriate tissue collection, processing and storage facilities to facilitate personalised treatments, integrated care boards and NHS providers put in place consistent operational arrangements for the safe and effective delivery of personalised cancer medicines, and regional and demographic variation in access to genomic testing, specialist cancer treatments and supporting data infrastructure is reduced. (2) In discharging the duty under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must have regard to the objectives of the National Cancer Plan for England."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Resilience to climate and environmental degradation risks Each NHS trust and NHS foundation trust must publish plans setting out- (a) an assessment of the risks to its premises, workforce and services from current and predicted impacts of climate change and environmental degradation, and (b) details of plans to implement measures which can address those risks."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Health improvement and health inequalities outcome targets for children (1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must- (a) (b) make regulations made by statutory instrument to set long term outcome targets for improving the health of children in England and reducing inequalities in health between children in England, and publish a cross-government strategy to set out how the target set by regulations under paragraph (a) will be achieved. (2) In preparing the strategy under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must consult any relevant bodies which they consider appropriate. (3) A Minister of the Crown must have regard to the strategy when exercising functions of the Minister. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Radiotherapy services: national planning and improvement (1) The Secretary of State must exercise functions in relation to the health service in England with a view to securing effective arrangements for planning and delivering improvements to radiotherapy services. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Secretary of State must publish a national delivery programme, informed by an assessment of clinical need and service capacity, setting out measures to- (a) improve access to radiotherapy services and reduce avoidable treatment delays, (b) address shortfalls in workforce, equipment and treatment capacity, including geographical inequalities in access, and (c) improve access to evidence-based modern radiotherapy techniques. (3) The programme must identify the actions required, the bodies responsible for their delivery and the timescales for implementation. (4) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for implementing the programme through the exercise of relevant statutory functions and keep the effectiveness of those arrangements under review. (5) The programme may form part of the National Cancer Plan for England, or any successor plan, provided that the requirements of this section are met."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "National strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, prepare and publish a national strategy for improving treatment, care and outcomes of persons living with inflammatory bowel disease. (2) The strategy must- (a) (b) establish nationally consistent standards of care and performance measures, informed by nationally recognised clinical guidelines, quality standards and service specifications, set measurable objectives for improving patient outcomes and quality of life, supported by consistent data that enables comparison between areas and over time, (c) promote workforce planning and training sufficient to meet the needs of persons living with inflammatory bowel disease, and (d) address inequalities in access to care and outcomes. (3) In preparing the strategy, the Secretary of State must consult- (a) persons living with inflammatory bowel disease and their carers, (b) organisations representing persons living with inflammatory bowel disease, (c) healthcare professionals with expertise in inflammatory bowel disease, and (d) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (4) The Secretary of State must review and, if considered appropriate, revise the strategy at intervals not exceeding five years. (5) In this section, "inflammatory bowel disease" includes Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and such related conditions as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations made by statutory instrument. (6) Regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament."
Clause 88, page 65, line 22, at end insert - "(za) section (Cap on care costs) (cap on care costs);"
None 83
Lord Patel (XB)Clause 22, page 16, line 25, at end insert—
“(4A) The constitution must provide for the ordinary members of the integrated care board to include—
(a) at least one qualified, professionally registered, consultant in public health who provides wholly independent, transparent, leadership and advice to the board on preventing and reducing disease and improving the health of the population it serves,
(b) at least two clinicians with current experience of providing primary care services, at least on of whom is a general practitioner, and
(c) at least one medical practitioner with current experience of providing secondary care services.
(4B) A person appointed under sub-paragraph (5) must not be appointed to represent the interests of a provider organisation whose services are commissioned by the integrated care board.”
This amendment would require every Integrated Care Board to include an independent qualified and registered consultant in public health, at least two clinicians from primary care, and a clinical representative from secondary care.
None 91
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Lab)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty of integrated care boards to commission stalking-related healthcare services
(1) Each integrated care board must make arrangements to commission, participate in or provide funding for public health services for victims of stalking within its area.
(2) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must have the objectives of—
(a) reducing physical and psychological harm to victims and others affected by stalking,
(b) identifying, assessing and addressing the clinical, psychological and psychiatric factors associated with stalking perpetration, and
(c) reducing demand upon health and social care services arising from stalking-related harm.
(3) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must include—
(a) specialist healthcare and psychological support for victims of stalking,
(b) specialist clinical assessment, treatment and therapeutic intervention for perpetrators of stalking where indicated,
(c) structured multi-agency physical and mental health risk assessments, and
(d) information sharing between relevant healthcare agencies.
(4) The duties under this section apply regardless of whether the stalking behaviour falls within the definition of domestic abuse under section 1 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (definition of “domestic abuse”).
(5) In fulfilling its duties under this section, an integrated care board must cooperate with—
(a) police forces and local policing bodies,
(b) local authorities,
(c) probation services,
(d) mental health providers,
(e) NHS trusts and primary care providers, and
(f) relevant voluntary and community sector organisations.
(6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance concerning the discharge of duties under this section, including guidance on—
(a) evidence-based multi-agency ways of working,
(b) health service responses to stalking victims,
(c) clinical assessment and treatment pathways for stalking perpetrators, and
(d) the collection and publication of outcome data, including health impacts and cost-benefit measures.
(7) In preparing guidance under subsection (6), the Secretary of State must consult organisations with expertise in stalking, mental health and public health.
(8) In this section, “stalking” has the meaning given in section 2A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (offence of stalking).”
This amendment places a duty on integrated care boards to make arrangements for multi-agency mental and physical healthcare support for stalking victims and in order to prevent stalking through psychological and psychiatric treatment of perpetrators, so as to reduce risk, improve outcomes and achieve cost benefits.
None 133
Lord Patel (XB)Clause 52, page 36, line 38, leave out from “regulations” to “any” in line 39 and insert “must provide that the processing of information in accordance with the regulations complies with”
This amendment would ensure that regulations made in relation to the disclosure or other processing of patient data must comply with the common law duty of confidentiality owed to the patient by those accessing their data.
None 30
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 8, page 5, line 7, leave out “relate to the health service” and insert “are public health functions”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, limits delegation directions to ICBs to public health functions.
None 31
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 8, page 5, line 8, at end insert—
“(1A) A direction under subsection (1) may provide for a function of the Secretary of State, other than a public health function, to be exercised by an integrated care board only with the agreement of that board.”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, requires an ICB’s agreement before it is directed to exercise any function other than a public health function.
None 40
Lord Scriven (LD)Leave out Clause 11 and insert the following new Clause—
“Outcomes for the health service and integrated care boards
(1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
“1CD National outcomes for the health service
(1) The Secretary of State must publish a statement of the outcomes which the health service in England is to achieve in the period specified in the statement.
(2) The outcomes must be expressed as results to be achieved for patients and populations, and may relate to—
(a) health and wellbeing;
(b) the safety, quality and effectiveness of care;
(c) access to services, including waiting times;
(d) the reduction of inequalities;
(e) the sustainable use of resources.
(3) The Secretary of State may revise the statement.
(4) Before publishing or revising the statement, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) integrated care boards, and
(b) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(5) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament—
(a) the statement and any revised statement, together with the reasons for any revision, and
(b) in respect of each financial year, a report on the progress made towards achieving the outcomes.”
(3) For sections 14Z61 and 14Z62 and the italic heading before those sections substitute—
“Outcomes, accountability and intervention
14Z61 Outcomes for integrated care boards
(1) The Secretary of State must, in respect of each financial year, specify by notice given to each integrated care board the outcomes which that board is to achieve (“ICB outcomes”).
(2) ICB outcomes—
(a) must be consistent with the most recent statement published under section 1CD,
(b) may differ between integrated care boards, and
(c) must specify results to be achieved, and not the means by which any function is to be exercised.
(3) In specifying ICB outcomes for an integrated care board, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) any assessment of relevant needs under section 116 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 (health and social care: joint strategic needs assessments), and
(b) any neighbourhood health plan under section 116A of that Act (health and social care: joint local health and wellbeing strategies), which relates to the whole or any part of the board’s area.
(4) Before specifying ICB outcomes for an integrated care board, the Secretary of State must—
(a) consult the board, and
(b) consider any representations made by a relevant local authority or by the mayor of a relevant mayoral strategic authority.
(5) The Secretary of State must publish each notice given under subsection (1).
(6) An integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to achieving its ICB outcomes.
(7) In this section and sections 14Z61A to 14Z62B—
“relevant local authority” , in relation to an integrated care board, means a local authority (within the meaning given by section 2B(5)) whose area coincides with, or includes the whole or any part of, the board’s area;
“relevant mayoral strategic authority” , in relation to an integrated care board, means a mayoral strategic authority (within the meaning given by paragraph 8(7) of Schedule 1B) whose area coincides with, or includes the whole or any part of, the board’s area.
14Z61A Accountability for ICB outcomes
(1) The Secretary of State must publish a framework (“the accountability framework”) setting out—
(a) how progress towards achieving ICB outcomes is to be measured,
(b) the information which integrated care boards must provide for that purpose, and
(c) how often progress is to be assessed.
(2) The Secretary of State may require an integrated care board—
(a) to provide such information as the Secretary of State considers necessary for the purposes of the accountability framework, and
(b) to publish a report on its progress towards achieving its ICB outcomes.
(3) Where a performance assessment under section 14Z59 shows that an integrated care board is not achieving its ICB outcomes, the Secretary of State may—
(a) require the board to publish a plan for achieving them, and
(b) provide assistance or support to the board under section 12DA.
(4) Nothing in this section confers power to give directions to an integrated care board.
14Z62 Intervention: appointment of commissioners
(1) The Secretary of State may by order appoint one or more persons (“commissioners”) to exercise specified functions of an integrated care board in place of the board if satisfied that—
(a) the board is seriously and persistently failing to achieve its ICB outcomes and, as a result, there is a serious risk to the safety or quality of care or to the proper management of public funds, or
(b) an emergency has occurred or is imminent which makes the appointment necessary.
(2) Before making an order on the ground in subsection (1)(a), the Secretary of State must—
(a) have conducted a performance assessment under section 14Z59 which shows the failure,
(b) give the board written notice of the proposed order and the reasons for it,
(c) allow the board a period of not less than 28 days, beginning with the day on which the notice is given, to make representations, and consider any representations made,
(d) consult each relevant local authority and the mayor of each relevant mayoral strategic authority, and
(e) consider what assistance or support has been provided to the board and what action the board has taken to address the failure.
(3) Where the Secretary of State makes an order on the ground in subsection (1)(b), the Secretary of State must give the board written notice of the order and the reasons for it as soon as practicable.
(4) In subsection (1)(b), “emergency” has the meaning given by section 1 of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (meaning of “emergency”).
(5) An order under subsection (1) must—
(a) name the commissioners,
(b) specify the functions to be exercised by them, and
(c) set out the reasons for the order, and has effect for such period, not exceeding 12 months, as is specified in the order.
(6) The Secretary of State may by order extend the period for which an order under subsection (1) has effect, on one occasion only, by a further period not exceeding 12 months.
(7) An order under subsection (6) may not be made unless a draft of the statutory instrument containing it has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.
(8) Within 7 days of making an order under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must publish the order and the reasons for it and lay a copy of each before Parliament.
(9) The Secretary of State must—
(a) review each order under subsection (1) at intervals of not more than 3 months,
(b) publish the outcome of each review, and
(c) revoke the order if satisfied that neither of the conditions in subsection (1) continues to be met.
(10) Commissioners appointed under this section—
(a) must exercise the specified functions with a view to achieving the board’s ICB outcomes,
(b) are subject to the duties of the board in relation to those functions,
(c) must consult the chair of the board and each relevant local authority, and
(d) must report to the Secretary of State at intervals of not more than 6 months.
(11) The Secretary of State must publish each report made under subsection (10)(d).
(12) The integrated care board must co-operate with the commissioners.
14Z62A Intervention: exceptions
An order under section 14Z62 may not authorise commissioners to exercise a function in relation to—
(a) the appointment or employment of a particular individual,
(b) a decision about the services to be provided to a particular individual for or in connection with the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness, or
(c) the provision of any drug, medicine or other treatment, or the use of any diagnostic technique, in a manner inconsistent with a recommendation or guidance given by NICE.
14Z62B Restriction on directions to integrated care boards
The Secretary of State may not give directions to an integrated care board about the exercise of its functions except under—
(a) section 133 (inadequate provision of pharmaceutical services);
(b) section 223GA (directions about use and management of resources);
(c) section 253 (emergency powers).””
This probing amendment would replace the Secretary of State’s new power to direct integrated care boards (ICBs) with national and ICB outcomes. The only intervention power would be to appoint commissioners where an ICB is seriously and persistently failing, or in an emergency, as with a failing local authority.
None 55
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 12, page 9, line 14, at end insert “, and,
(b) must have regard to the most recent statement published under section 1CD (national outcomes for the health service)”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, requires ICBs commissioning under section 3 of the National Health Service Act 2006 to have regard to the national outcomes statement.
None 56
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 12, page 9, line 22, at end insert “, and
(b) must have regard to the most recent statement published under section 1CD (national outcomes for the health service)”
This amendment makes the same change as the amendment to clause 12, page 9, line 14 in the name of Lord Scriven in section 3A of the National Health Service Act 2006.
None 69
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 16, page 13, leave out lines 1 to 3 and insert—
“(b) make an order under section 14Z62 on grounds relating to the discharge of the board’s functions in relation to those matters,”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, updates a cross-reference to the direction powers which that amendment removes.
None 76
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 21, page 16, line 2, at end insert “, including its progress towards achieving its ICB outcomes (see section 14Z61)”
This amendment, consequential on the amendment in the name of Lord Scriven to replace clause 11, requires ICB performance assessments to cover progress against ICB outcomes.
None 77
Lord Scriven (LD)Clause 21, page 16, line 5, at end insert—
“(4) The Secretary of State must publish each performance assessment conducted under this section.”
This amendment requires each ICB performance assessment to be published in full.
None 239
Lord Scriven (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Reducing inequalities in mortality for people with a learning disability and autistic people
(1) The Secretary of State must make and maintain arrangements under this section for identifying and reducing inequalities in life expectancy or avoidable mortality experienced by people with a learning disability or autistic people compared with the general population, including arrangements for—
(a) detailed reviews of the deaths of people with a learning disability and autistic people,
(b) the identification and annual publication, by each integrated care board, of themes, inequalities, service failures and learning arising from those reviews,
(c) the annual national aggregation, analysis and independent academic audit of findings from those reviews and integrated care board reports to identify national themes, systemic failures, opportunities for improvement and data gaps, and
(d) annual public reporting and oversight by the Secretary of State of the operation and effectiveness of arrangements under this section.
(2) The arrangements under subsection (1) must require integrated care boards to—
(a) identify deaths falling within the scope of the arrangements,
(b) ensure detailed reviews are carried out in accordance with the standard set out in subsection (3), covering at least a nationally specified minimum proportion of deaths set out in subsection (4),
(c) ensure deaths meeting the criteria for enhanced scrutiny set out in subsection (5) undergo detailed review,
(d) produce, publish, and implement an annual action plan specifying concrete steps and measurable targets to address learning and service failures,
(e) provide findings from reviews for national analysis, and
(f) publish an annual report in accordance with subsection (6).
(3) A detailed review must—
(a) be carried out by a reviewer who is independent of any body that provided health or social care to the person in the year before their death,
(b) be completed within six months of the integrated care board being notified of the death,
(c) include examination of the person’s health and care records,
(d) seek the views of a family member, carer or advocate of the person,
(e) assess—
(i) the quality of the health and social care the person received,
(ii) whether reasonable adjustments were made to that care,
(iii) whether the death was potentially avoidable, and
(iv) any learning for the integrated care board, providers or other bodies, and
(f) be recorded in a format common to all integrated care boards, so that reviews are consistent and comparable nationally.
(4) In each financial year, each integrated care board must ensure that the number of deaths subject to detailed review is not less than one half of the deaths it identifies under subsection (2)(a), and deaths reviewed under subsection (2)(c) count towards that proportion.
(5) The criteria for enhanced scrutiny are that—
(a) the person was from an ethnic minority background,
(b) the person was autistic and did not have a learning disability,
(c) a family member, carer or advocate of the person has requested a detailed review,
(d) at the time of their death, the person was detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, deprived of their liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, or an inpatient in a mental health or learning disability setting, or
(e) a concern has been raised by any person about the care or treatment the person received.
(6) Each integrated care board must produce and publish an annual report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people—
(a) the number and proportion of identified deaths subject to detailed review,
(b) recurring themes, service failures, and health inequalities,
(c) measurable progress made against previous action plans, and
(d) significant data gaps and actions required to rectify them.
(7) The Secretary of State must ensure that—
(a) findings from individual reviews and integrated care board reports are aggregated and analysed nationally at least annually, and
(b) the national aggregated findings, data and analysis are audited by an independent academic body to verify their accuracy and ensure independent evaluation prior to publication.
(8) The Secretary of State must publish, at least annually, a national report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people—
(a) national mortality data, recurring themes, systemic failures, and inequalities,
(b) the findings and verification assessment of the independent academic audit conducted under subsection (7)(b),
(c) national priorities, mandatory targets, and system-wide actions required for improvement,
(d) actions taken or proposed by the Secretary of State, NHS bodies, providers, and regulators, and
(e) steps taken to address identified data gaps.
(9) Where a report under subsection (6) or (8), or a performance assessment under section 14Z59 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (performance assessment of integrated care boards), indicates recurring service failures, persistent mortality inequalities, or a failure by an integrated care board or NHS body to implement required improvements, the Secretary of State may issue binding directions to that board or body specifying—
(a) the mandatory improvement actions required, and
(b) the time frame within which those actions must be completed.
(10) An integrated care board, NHS trust or NHS foundation trust must comply with any direction given under subsection (9).
(11) The Secretary of State must, in respect of each financial year—
(a) conduct a review of the operation, effectiveness and impact of arrangements under this section,
(b) assess the extent to which relevant bodies have implemented learning and complied with directions,
(c) lay the national report and statutory review before Parliament, and
(d) make an oral statement to Parliament on the findings of the review and overall progress in reducing avoidable mortality.
(12) In conducting a performance assessment of an integrated care board under section 14Z59 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (performance assessment of integrated care boards), the Secretary of State must evaluate the board's compliance with this section and its implementation of directions issued under subsection (9).
(13) The Secretary of State must issue statutory guidance on the operation of these arrangements, and integrated care boards and relevant NHS bodies must act in accordance with that guidance.
(14) Guidance under subsection (13)—
(a) must make provision about—
(i) the notification of deaths to integrated care boards,
(ii) the training and independence of reviewers,
(iii) support for families, carers and advocates during reviews, and
(iv) the common format required by subsection (3)(f)
(b) may make further provision about the matters in subsections (3) to (5), but may not disapply or reduce any requirement of those subsections,
(c) must be published following consultation with people with a learning disability, autistic people, their families and carers, and organisations representing them, and
(d) must be laid before Parliament.”
Opposition Amendment 240
Lord Blencathra (Con) - Shadow Minister (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 21 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“De-registration of doctors and health care professionals found to have committed sexual misconduct
(1) The Secretary of State must make regulations made by statutory instrument requiring a statutory regulator of a health or care profession to remove from its register any person found to have committed sexual misconduct.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) must provide that removal from the register is the mandatory sanction and may not be replaced by a lesser sanction.
(3) In this section, “sexual misconduct” includes sexual abuse, sexual assault, sexual harassment, sexually motivated conduct, and any sexual conduct involving an abuse of a position of professional trust.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This amendment seeks to require statutory regulators of health and care professions to permanently remove from their professional register any person found to have committed sexual misconduct and would prevent regulators from imposing a lesser sanction in such cases.
None 241
Lord Patel (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Periodic review of public health system
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that an independent review of the state of the public health system is conducted at intervals of no more than three years.
(2) The Secretary of State must lay a report of each review before Parliament.”
This amendment seeks to probe the Government on whether it would support a statutory requirement for regular independent reviews of the public health system in order to assess its overall condition, identify emerging provisions and ensure parliamentary scrutiny.
None 242
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 21 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Integration of voluntary sector and health and social care services in the provision of palliative care
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to integrate the specialist palliative care provided by the voluntary sector with such services provided by the NHS.
(2) Such integration must include, but is not limited to—
(a) provision of specialist palliative care support,
(b) provision of in-patient palliative care beds when required,
(c) sharing of equipment,
(d) availability of NHS pharmacy services and supply of medication,
(e) collaboration in education and training of the health and social care workforce, and
(f) provision of honorary contracts across different providers, to ensure staff mobility as required for patient care.
(3) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement specifying how it has complied with this section.
(4) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This amendment seeks to ensure streamlined provision of services for patients receiving specialist palliative care irrespective of where they are being cared for.
Government Amendment 1
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 2, page 1, line 16, at end insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State may not make a transfer scheme transferring anything to—
(a) a Scottish public body, without the consent of the Scottish Ministers;
(b) a Welsh public body, without the consent of the Welsh Ministers;
(c) a Northern Ireland public body, without the consent of a Northern Ireland department.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to seek the consent of the appropriate devolved nation before making a transfer scheme which transferred property, rights and liabilities from NHS England to a Scottish public body, Welsh public body or Northern Ireland public body.
Government Amendment 2
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 2, page 2, line 14, leave out subsection (4)
This is consequential on my amendment to Clause 2, page 2, line 21.
Government Amendment 3
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 2, page 2, line 21, at end insert—
“(7) In this section—
“Northern Ireland public body” means a public body whose functions are exercisable only or mainly in or as regards Northern Ireland and relate only or mainly to transferred matters (within the meaning of the Northern Ireland Act 1998);
“Scottish public body” means a body that is a Scottish public authority with mixed functions or no reserved functions (within the meaning of the Scotland Act 1998);
“the TUPE regulations” means the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/246);
“Welsh public body” means a body that is a devolved Welsh authority as defined by section 157A of the Government of Wales Act 2006.”
This is consequential on my amendment to clause 2, page 1, line 16.
None 14
Lord Patel of Bradford (None)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities between people living in coastal and inland areas with respect to their ability to access health services and the outcomes achieved for them by the provision of health services, with particular regard to prevention, the planning and commissioning of services, and the recruitment, retention and distribution of the health workforce.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State, when exercising functions in relation to the health service, to have specific regard to reducing inequalities in access to health services and health outcomes between coastal and inland communities, including in relation to prevention, service planning and commissioning, and workforce recruitment, retention and distribution.
None 48
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Support for helping people stay and get back into work
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty to support people to stay and get back into work
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to offer workplace health provision support to—
(a) small and medium sized employers, and
(b) institutions and providers within the National Health Service, considering the need to support the workforce of—
(i) small and medium sized employers, and
(ii) the National Health Service
in order to tackle ill health and reduce work days lost to sickness.””
None 54
Lord Lansley (Con)Clause 12, page 9, line 8 at end insert—
“(za) in subsection (1), after (j) insert—
“(k) such other services and facilities as are required for persons with a primary health need arising from a progressive or deteriorating disease which is reasonably expected to continue for the remainder of the person's life, including where the person's condition is intermittent or fluctuating, and without regard to the rate of such progression or deterioration or whether a person is entering a terminal phase of their life.””
This amendment would ensure that a wider range of serious chronic diseases, such as severe dementia, would qualify for NHS Continuing Care and not have eligibility restricted on grounds that the condition is fluctuating or is deemed to be in a terminal phase.
None 72
Lord Patel of Bradford (None)After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause—
“Commissioning functions: minimum waiting time prohibition
(1) An NHS commissioning body or an NHS provider must not apply any policy, contractual term, activity planning assumption or other commissioning arrangement which requires a patient to wait for a minimum period before receiving an assessment, diagnostic test or treatment, where that minimum period is imposed for administrative, financial or capacity-management reasons rather than on clinical grounds.
(2) In this section “NHS commissioning body” includes national bodies, integrated care boards and the Secretary of State.”
This amendment seeks to prohibit NHS commissioning bodies and providers from imposing or implementing minimum waiting periods for assessments, tests or treatment for administrative, financial or management reasons, while preserving clinically justified decisions about the timing of care.
None 78
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 21 Oct 2026Clause 21, page 16, line 5, at end insert—
“(4) Performance assessments must include details of the extent to which palliative care services or facilities provided by each integrated care board meet the reasonable requirements of the people for whom the board is responsible.
(5) For the purposes of subsection (4) the following guidances are considered reasonable requirements—
(a) NICE guideline NG31 on care of dying adults in the last days of life;
(b) NICE guideline NG142 on end of life care for adults and service delivery;
(c) NICE quality standard QS13 on end of life care for adults;
(d) NHS England statutory guidance for integrated care boards on palliative and end of life care.”
This amendment would require annual performance assessments to incorporate an assessment of whether each integrated care board is providing a reasonable standard of palliative and end of life care.
None 81
Lord Lansley (Con)Clause 22, page 16, line 16, leave out “mayor of each mayoral”
This amendment, and others in the name of Lord Lansley, would ensure that the NHS can enter into arrangements with local authorities who have social care and other health-related functions and with all the new strategic authorities, including single foundation strategic authorities, and not only those with mayors.
None 84
Lord Lansley (Con)Clause 22, page 16, leave out lines 30 to 43 and insert—
““Strategic Authority” has the meaning given by section 1 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026.”
This amendment, and others in the name of Lord Lansley, would ensure that the NHS can enter into arrangements with local authorities who have social care and other health-related functions and with all the new strategic authorities, including single foundation strategic authorities, and not only those with mayors.
Government Amendment 103
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 28, page 20, line 27, at end insert—
“(b) after subsection (5) insert—
“(5A) The power under subsection (1) may not be used for the purpose of establishing a body that performs functions only or mainly in respect of Wales.””
This spells out that the power in section 28 of the NHS Act 2006 cannot be used to create a Wales-only Special Health Authority. It is needed because of the removal of the territorial restriction in section 271, which limited the exercise of the power to England.
Government Amendment 104
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 28, page 20, line 30, at end insert—
“(c) after subsection (2) insert—
“(3) In this section a reference to a Special Health Authority is to a Special Health Authority which—
(a) performs functions only or mainly in respect of England, or
(b) neither performs functions only or mainly in respect of England, nor performs functions only or mainly in respect of Wales.””
This clarifies that the power to make regulations about the delegation of Special Health Authority functions is not exercisable in relation to Wales-only Special Health Authorities. It is needed because of the removal of the territorial restriction in section 271, which limited the exercise of the power to England.
None 107
Lord Lansley (Con)Clause 41, page 30, leave out lines 1 to 3 and insert “a strategic authority as defined in section 1 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026.”
This amendment, and others in the name of Lord Lansley would ensure that the NHS can enter into arrangements with local authorities who have social care and other health-related functions and with all the new strategic authorities, including single foundation strategic authorities, and not only those with mayors.
Government Amendment 128
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 36, line 37, at end insert—
“(2A) A requirement by virtue of subsection (2)(b) may be imposed on a person providing health care or social care only if they provide health care or social care in England.”
Regulations can require people to disclose information for the purposes of making it available through the single patient record etc. This ensures that the regulation-making power can only be used to require information from those who provide health care or social care in England.
Government Amendment 151
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 116, line 26, at end insert—
“(2A) But the Secretary of State may establish and operate an information system under subsection (2) for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision of health care or adult social care in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland only if the appropriate national authority consents.
(2B) Consent under subsection (2A) may be given subject to conditions relating to the following so far as relating to the information system to which the consent applies—
(a) the making of requests for information under section 259(1)(c);
(b) the publication of information under section 260;
(c) the disclosure of information under section 261.”
The effect of this amendment is that the Secretary of State can establish information systems relating to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland only with the consent of the devolved administrations. Consent may be given subject to conditions as to certain matters.
Government Amendment 152
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 116, line 27, at end insert—
““appropriate national authority” —
(a) in relation to Scotland, means the Scottish Ministers;
(b) in relation to Wales, means the Welsh Ministers;
(c) in relation to Northern Ireland, means the Department of Health;”
This is consequential on my amendment to Schedule 8, page 116, line 26.
Government Amendment 153
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 118, line 19, at end insert—
(3A)After subsection (2) insert—
(2A)The power under subsection (1)(c) is subject to any conditions imposed by virtue of section 254(2B) (power for devolved administrations to give consent to establishment and operation of an information system subject to conditions).””
This provides that the Secretary of State’s power to request information for purposes relating to the establishment or operation of an information system relating to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland is subject to any conditions imposed by the appropriate national authority when it gave its consent to the system.
Government Amendment 154
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 119, line 16, at end insert—
“(2A) The power under subsection (1) is subject to any conditions imposed by virtue of section 254(2B) (power for devolved administrations to give consent to establishment and operation of an information system subject to conditions).”
This provides that the Secretary of State’s power to publish information obtained in the operation of an information system relating to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland is subject to any conditions imposed by the appropriate national authority when it gave its consent to the system.
Government Amendment 155
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 120, line 20, at end insert—
“(3A) The power under subsection (1) is subject to any conditions imposed by virtue of section 254(2B) (power for devolved administrations to give consent to establishment and operation of an information system subject to conditions)."”
This provides that the Secretary of State’s power to disclose information obtained in the operation of an information system relating to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland is subject to any conditions imposed by the appropriate national authority when it gave its consent to the system.
Government Amendment 157
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 122, line 10, at end insert—
““appropriate national authority” has the meaning given by section 254(3);”;
This is consequential on my amendment to Schedule 8, page 116, line 27.
Government Amendment 181
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 58, page 43, line 9, at end insert—
“(1A) Before making arrangements under subsection (1)(a) with a Scottish health body the Secretary of State must obtain the consent of the Scottish Ministers.”
This requires the Secretary of State to obtain the consent of the Scottish Ministers before making arrangements with a Scottish health body about information services etc under the provision inserted by clause 58.
Government Amendment 182
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 59, page 43, leave out line 29 and insert—
“(1A) Omit section 295 (arrangements between NHS England and Northern Ireland Ministers to commission services).
(2) After section 294B (inserted by section 58 of this Act) insert—”
This is consequential on my amendment to clause 87, page 65, line 6. The repeal of existing section 295 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 will extend to England and Wales (since that section extends to England and Wales only) but the new section 295 will have UK extent.
Government Amendment 183
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 59, page 43, line 40, at end insert—
“(1A) Before making arrangements under subsection (1)(a) with a Scottish health body the Secretary of State must obtain the consent of the Scottish Ministers.”
This requires the Secretary of State to obtain the consent of the Scottish Ministers before making arrangements to commission services etc with a Scottish health body under the provision inserted by clause 59.
Government Amendment 187
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England
(1) The Secretary of State must appoint a person as the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England (
“the Commissioner” ).
(2) Schedule (Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England) makes provision about the Commissioner.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to appoint a Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England, and would also introduce a new schedule (after Schedule 11) setting out how the Commissioner will operate.
Government Amendment 188
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Functions of the Commissioner
(1) The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England must promote improvements in maternity and neonatal care in England.
(2) In the discharge of that function the Commissioner may, among other things—
(a) scrutinise the effectiveness of programmes designed to improve maternity and neonatal care;
(b) carry out reviews into the provision of maternity and neonatal care;
(c) facilitate or otherwise promote discussion about how maternity and neonatal care can be improved (including discussion involving people providing or receiving care);
(d) advise the Secretary of State on the provision of maternity and neonatal care;
(e) carry out reviews into the connection between the general health care needs of women and any potential future pregnancy of theirs;
(f) carry out reviews into how the health care needs of women are affected by pregnancy;
(g) carry out reviews into how to better meet the health care needs of newborn children;
(h) prepare and publish reports relating to any matter reviewed or considered by the Commissioner in the exercise of any of their functions;
(i) make recommendations (whether in a report or otherwise).
(3) A person to whom a recommendation is made under subsection (2)(i) must respond to that recommendation within such period and in such manner as the Commissioner may require (and the Commissioner may publish details of any failure to comply).
(4) The Commissioner must send to the Secretary of State a copy of any report published by the Commissioner in the exercise of functions conferred under this section.
(5) The Commissioner must, when exercising their functions, have regard to the need to reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the provision of maternity and neonatal care.
(6) When exercising their functions, the Commissioner must take reasonable steps to find out the views of women and others with an interest in maternity and neonatal care.
(7) In this section—
(a) a reference to maternity care includes—
(i) the provision of services to family members of a woman in connection with her pregnancy or childbirth;
(ii) health care needed by a woman as a consequence of a past pregnancy;
(b) a reference to neonatal care includes the provision of services to family members of a newborn child in connection with the health care needs of the child.
(8) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument exclude particular descriptions of care from the meaning of maternity or neonatal care in this section.
(9) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (8) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(10) Section 9(1) of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 is to be disregarded for the purposes of construing this section.”
This amendment would set out the functions of the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England.
Government Amendment 192
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to co-operate with Commissioner
(1) The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England may request a public authority to co-operate with the Commissioner in any way that the Commissioner considers necessary for the purposes of the Commissioner’s functions.
(2) The ways in which a public authority may be requested to co-operate include allowing entry onto premises.
(3) A public authority must, so far as reasonably practicable, comply with a request made to it under this section.
(4) The Commissioner may publish details of any failure to comply with a request.
(5) The Commissioner may make a request under this section only to a public authority that performs functions wholly or partly in relation to England.”
This amendment would allow the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England to request that a public authority co-operate with the Commissioner (including by permitting entry onto premises). The Commissioner would be able to publish details of any failure to comply.
Government Amendment 193
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Provision of information to Commissioner
(1) The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England may require a person to provide the Commissioner with information.
(2) A requirement may specify when and how the information is to be provided.
(3) The only information that a person may be required to provide is information which the person could, apart from this section, lawfully disclose to the Commissioner.
(4) The Commissioner may publish details of any failure to comply with a requirement.
(5) The Commissioner may require the provision of information by a person only if they provide services in connection with the provision of maternity or neonatal care in England or, in the case of a public authority, they perform functions wholly or partly in relation to England.
(6) A reference in this section to maternity care or neonatal care has the same meaning as in section (Functions of the Commissioner).”
This amendment would allow the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England to require a person to supply information to the Commissioner. The Commissioner would be able to publish details of any failure to comply.
Government Amendment 194
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“Power to carry out clinical case reviews when directed
(1) The Secretary of State may direct the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England to carry out a review into the maternity or neonatal care that has been provided to a particular person or class of people.
(2) A direction may specify matters to be addressed as part of a review.
(3) The Secretary of State must consult the Commissioner before giving a direction.
(4) A reference in this section to maternity care or neonatal care has the same meaning as in section (Functions of the Commissioner).”
This amendment would allow the Secretary of State to direct the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England to review the maternity or neonatal care provided to a particular person or class of people.
Government Amendment 201
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)After Schedule 11, insert the following new Schedule—
“Schedule 11A
MATERNITY AND NEONATAL COMMISSIONER FOR ENGLAND
Appointment and tenure of office
1 (1)The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England holds and vacates office in accordance with the terms of their appointment, subject to the provisions of this paragraph.
(2)The Commissioner must be appointed for a term of no more than three years.
(3)A person cannot be appointed as the Commissioner more than twice.
(4)The Commissioner may resign by giving written notice to the Secretary of State.
(5)The Secretary of State may by written notice remove the Commissioner from office on the grounds that—
(a)the Commissioner has without reasonable excuse failed to carry out their functions, or
(b)in the opinion of the Secretary of State, the Commissioner is otherwise unable, unfit or unwilling to carry out their functions.
Crown status
2 The Commissioner is not to be regarded as the servant or agent of the Crown or as enjoying any status, immunity or privilege of the Crown.
Staff and facilities
3 (1)The Secretary of State may provide staff, facilities or other assistance to the Commissioner.
(2)The Commissioner may authorise any member of staff to exercise any of the Commissioner’s functions.
Remuneration etc
4 (1)The Secretary of State may pay remuneration to the Commissioner.
(2)The Secretary of State may pay such pensions or allowances as they may determine to or in respect of the Commissioner.
Annual reports
5 (1)The Commissioner must, as soon as possible after the end of each financial year, publish a report on the exercise of their functions during that year.
(2)The Secretary of State may give the Commissioner directions as to matters that must be addressed in the annual report.
(3)The Commissioner must send a copy of their annual report to the Secretary of State.
(4)The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the annual report before Parliament.
(5)In this paragraph,
“financial year” means—
(a)the period beginning with the day on which the first Commissioner takes office and ending with the following 31 March, and
(b)each successive period of 12 months.
Business plans
6 (1)The Commissioner must publish a business plan which sets out—
(a)the main activities that the Commissioner proposes to undertake during the period covered by the plan, and
(b)the Commissioner’s strategic priorities for that period.
(2)A business plan must cover a period of at least 12 months beginning with the date of publication.
(3)The Commissioner must publish a new business plan before the end of the period covered by the preceding business plan.
(4)The Commissioner must send a copy of the business plan to the Secretary of State before it is published.”
This Schedule would contain detailed provisions relating to the functioning of the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England.
Government Amendment 202
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 74, page 52, line 12, at end insert—
“(4) After section 8, insert—
“8A Offences relating to information
(1) A person to whom information is disclosed under section 8 commits an offence if the person uses or discloses that information in contravention of subsection (3C) of that section.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable—
(a) on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding the maximum term for summary offences or a fine (or both), or
(b) on summary conviction in Scotland or Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (or both).
(3) In subsection (2)(a)“the maximum term for summary offences” means—
(a) if the offence is committed before the time when section 281(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 comes into force, six months;
(b) if the offence is committed after that time, 51 weeks.””
This amendment would make it an offence to disclose information received from a relevant authority without that authority’s agreement or a court or tribunal order. The offence mirrors the existing offence of disclosing information in relation to medical devices under section 40 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021.
None 243
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 21 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Communication with parents of children who are near to death
(1) The Secretary of State must, within the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, publish guidance about communication between relevant NHS bodies and the parents of critically ill children in relation to decisions concerning their child's treatment and care.
(2) Guidance issued under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) parents to be consulted and informed about decisions concerning the care or treatment of their child and the reasons for those decisions,
(b) facilitating access to an independent specialist second opinion in cases involving potentially life-ending or life-changing decisions,
(c) access to an independent mediator where there is disagreement between parents and clinicians regarding the care or treatment of a child,
(d) the transfer of a child to another hospital where an independent specialist second opinion supports such transfer and appropriate clinical safeguards are satisfied, and
(e) arrangements to fulfil parent’s wishes for family members to visit a child before the child's death, whether in the hospital, a children’s hospice or under clinical or hospice supervision the family home.
(3) In preparing guidance under this section, the Secretary of State must have regard to Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.”
This new clause seeks to require the Secretary of State to issue guidance to integrated care boards and hospitals concerning their role in communicating with parents of critically ill children near to death, and involving them in decision-making.
Opposition Amendment 244
Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Con) - Opposition Whip (Lords)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 21 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of interoperability of NHS digital applications across the United Kingdom
Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must—
(a) undertake and publish a review of the interoperability of patient-facing digital applications used by the health services in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland,
(b) consult the relevant health authorities in each part of the United Kingdom regarding the interoperability of patient-facing digital applications, and
(c) lay before Parliament a report setting out the findings of the review and any proposals for improving interoperability.”
This amendment seeks to require the Secretary of State to review the interoperability of patient-facing digital health applications used across the United Kingdom, and to report on opportunities to improve the sharing of information between them.
None 245
Baroness Gerada (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Integrated frailty pathways
(1) Integrated care boards must make arrangements to ensure the provision of an integrated frailty pathway for adults attending an accident and emergency department who are identified as living with, or at risk of, frailty.
(2) The pathway must support—
(a) early identification of frailty,
(b) timely assessment, including comprehensive geriatric assessment where clinically appropriate,
(c) access to appropriate multidisciplinary care and coordination, and
(d) effective coordination between hospital services, general practices, community health services and adult social care, including to support safe discharge and alternatives to hospital admission where clinically appropriate.
(3) In discharging its duty under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to relevant national guidance, standards and frameworks relating to frailty and urgent and emergency care.”
This new clause seeks to require integrated care boards to ensure integrated frailty pathways, supporting early identification, appropriate assessment, coordinated multidisciplinary care and integration across hospital, primary, community and social care, having regard to relevant national guidance and future developments in frailty and urgent and emergency care policy.
Government Amendment 280
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 150, line 8, at end insert—
“Public Records Act 1958
1A In Schedule 1 to the Public Records Act 1958 (definition of public records), in Part 2 of the Table in paragraph 3, at the appropriate place insert—
“Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England.””
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to introduce a new clause after clause 71.
Government Amendment 281
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 157, line 25, at end insert—
(c)in Part 6 (other public bodies and offices: general), at the appropriate place insert—
“The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England.””
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to introduce a new clause after clause 71.
Government Amendment 282
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 172, line 2, at end insert—
(ba)after paragraph (ga), insert—
(gb)the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England,””
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to introduce a new clause after clause 71.
Government Amendment 283
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 186, line 8, at end insert—
(c)at the appropriate place, insert “The Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England”.”
This amendment is consequential on my amendment to introduce a new clause after clause 71.
Government Amendment 284
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 212, line 11, at end insert—
“400A In section 126 (co-operation with HSSIB), in subsection (3)—
(a) omit paragraph (b);
(b) after paragraph (n) insert—
“(o) the Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner for England.”
400B (1)Section 127 (assistance of NHS bodies) is amended as follows.
(2)In subsection (1) omit paragraph (b).
(3)In subsection (2)—
(a)omit paragraph (c);
(b)after paragraph (d) insert—
(e)a Special Health Authority.”
400C In section 135 (interpretation of Part 4), in the definition of “NHS trust” omit “section 25 of”.”
This adds consequential amendments to the Bill.
Government Amendment 285
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 12, page 212, line 12, at end insert—
“401A In Schedule 13 (the Health Services Safety Investigations Body), omit Part 2 (transfer schemes).”
This adds a consequential amendment to the Bill.
Government Amendment 287
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 87, page 65, line 6, at end insert—
“(da) section 59(2) (arrangements to commission services for devolved authorities);”
This changes the extent of new section 295 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (inserted by clause 59) so as to allow the Secretary of State to make arrangements with the devolved administrations to commission services anywhere in the United Kingdom.
Government Amendment 288
Baroness Merron (Lab) - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 87, page 65, line 10, leave out paragraph (g)
This is consequential on my amendment to leave out Schedule 9.
LORD PATEL
Lord Bishop of Gloucester (Bshp)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause- "Women's centres After section 14Z35 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert- "14Z35B Duty to cooperate: integrated care boards and women's centres (1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, cooperate with women's centres for the purpose of - (a) tackling health inequalities affecting women, and (b) improving the prevention, diagnosis and treatment including awareness of and access to treatment of women's health needs and wellbeing. (2) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, a requirement for the integrated care board to- (a) secure the involvement of women's centres in the planning of commissioning arrangements and decisions about the provision of services relevant to women's health, including services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage, (b) arrangements under subsection (2)(a) may include, in particular - (i) delivery of NHS services from, or in connection with, women's centres, (ii) the commissioning of services from women's centres, (iii) the establishment or enhancement of referral pathways between NHS services and women's centres, and (iv) other forms of cooperation which the integrated care board considers likely to improve women's access to health care or reduce health inequalities, (c) have regard, when exercising its functions under sections 14Z35 (duties as to reducing inequalities) and 14Z45 (public involvement and consultation), to the views of women's centres, (d) work with women's centres to identify, monitor and review health inequalities and barriers to accessing health care provision affecting women in the integrated care board's boundary, and (e) have regard, in exercising its functions under this section, to any strategy or policy statement relating to women's health published or approved by the Secretary of State. (3) In complying with subsection (2), an integrated care board must secure that women's centres are, so far as reasonably practicable- (a) involved in the preparation and review of any strategy or plan prepared by the integrated care board that relates to women's health, and (b) consulted on proposals by the integrated care board that may have a significant impact on the provision of services to women in its boundary. (4) In this section- "women's centre" means a locally based community organisation within the board's boundaries that specialises in supporting women, that- (a) is a social purpose body, (b) provides multi-faceted and therapeutic support to women experiencing multiple disadvantage, and (c) provides women-only services or facilities appropriate to the needs and safety of the women using those services; "multiple disadvantage" means a person's experiences of two or more of the following- (a) poverty or financial exclusion, (b) homelessness, (c) victimisation including domestic abuse, sexual violence and exploitation, (d) contact with the criminal justice system, (e) mental ill health, physical ill health and substance dependence, and (f) other circumstances as may be prescribed; "social purpose body" means any body corporate or unincorporated association whose primary purpose is to advance charitable, community, social, environmental, cultural or other public benefit objectives, and whose governing arrangements ensure that any profits or surpluses are applied wholly or principally in furtherance of those objectives rather than for private distribution; "therapeutic support services" means services whose principal purpose is to improve or maintain the mental, emotional, physical or social wellbeing of individuals through therapeutic, rehabilitative, preventative or recovery-focused interventions, and includes services provided in community, residential, educational or healthcare settings.""
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause- "Integrated care boards: prisons and probation After section 14744 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert - "14Z44A Duty as to prisons and probation etc (1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, comply with the conditions of this section. (2) The first condition is that they have due regard to the need to improve health outcomes for - (a) people in custody of the Prison Service, and (b) people under the supervision of the probation service in the community. (3) The second condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure continuity of care for people- (a) sentenced to a custodial sentence, (b) moved between prisons, (c) moved between areas pursuant to a community sentence imposed by a court, (d) released from secure custody and remaining under the supervision of the probation service, or (e) leaving the supervision of the probation service. (4) The third condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure that people mentioned in subsection (2) have access, in addition to any services commissioned by local authorities, to- (a) mental health support, including but not limited to acute mental health services and psychiatric treatment, (b) substance misuse support, including but not limited to opiate and non-opiate and alcohol recovery services, (c) addiction services, including but not limited to smoking cessation, and gambling disorder services, and (d) other specialised services determined appropriate by assessment of local community needs or delivered by local providers. (5) When complying with the conditions set out in this section, an integrated care board must have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (6) The Secretary of State may issue guidance on specific services which must be commissioned by integrated care boards in order to comply with this section."""
Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert- "(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding."
Clause 48, page 33, line 14, after "(1)" insert "or (2A)".
Clause 52, page 36, line 19, at end insert- "(1A) The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers."
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause- "Single patient record: right to opt out of use for purposes other than direct care (1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must enable a patient to opt out of information relating to them which is made available through the system established under those regulations being used for any purpose other than their direct care. (2) The regulations must enable a patient to opt out, or to withdraw an opt-out, at any time and free of charge - (a) through their GP practice, (b) electronically, or (c) by other means accessible to persons without internet access. (3) The regulations may not permit an opt-out to be overridden except where required by an order of a court or where necessary to protect the patient's life."
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- "Retention of NHS number on following adoption (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person's NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a person's health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made. (3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to- (a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and (b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent. (4) In this section- "adoption order" has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; "health record" has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018; "NHS number" has the same meaning as "consistent identifier" in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Right to a GP appointment (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to provide every patient with the right to receive a GP appointment within seven days of seeking one, or 24 hours if urgent. (2) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/2996) to make the right described in subsection (1) a right in the NHS constitution. (3) The Secretary of State may review the scheme every three years from the day on which this Act is passed and amend it through regulations made by statutory instrument. (4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. (5) For the purposes of this section- "GP appointment" means an appointment with an appropriate clinician within a GP practice; "urgent" has the current definition provided under general practitioner triaging protocols."
None 236
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Fixed recoverable costs in clinical negligence claims
(1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must decide whether to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for clinical negligence claims in which the value of damages is £25,000 or less.
(2) Within the period specified in subsection (1), the Secretary of State must lay before each House of Parliament a statement setting out the decision made under that subsection.
(3) The statement must confirm that the Secretary of State has decided either—
(a) to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for such claims, or
(b) not to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for such claims.
(4) Where the Secretary of State has decided to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs, the statement must set out—
(a) the principal features of the proposed scheme, and
(b) the proposed timetable for its implementation.
(5) In this section, “fixed recoverable costs” means provision fixing the amount of legal costs recoverable in respect of a clinical negligence claim.”
This would require the Secretary of State, within six months of Royal Assent, to decide whether to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for NHS clinical negligence claims in which the value of damages is £25,000 or less, and to lay a statement setting out that decision before both Houses of Parliament. If the Secretary of State decides to proceed, the statement must also set out the principal features of the proposed scheme and the proposed timetable for its implementation.
None 237
Baroness Hollins (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Research into innovative treatments involving controlled substances
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument take steps to enable and support the development of research relating to innovative treatments, which use substances listed in Schedule 1 to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/3998).
(2) Regulations made under this section must make provision, for—
(a) the lawful possession, supply, administration, production and importation of such substances for the purposes of clinical trials or other research activities approved in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary of State, notwithstanding any prohibition or restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, and
(b) proportionate and timely arrangements relating to the approval, licensing and oversight of authorised research activities under this section.
(3) Provision under subsection (2) applies to—
(a) approved research bodies,
(b) authorised researchers,
(c) participating healthcare providers, and
(d) specified substances used for approved research purposes,
and does not alter the schedule or classification of a substance.
(4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to take steps to enable and support the development of research relating to innovative treatments, which use substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.
None 238
Baroness Hollins (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Compassionate access to innovative treatments
(1) In exercising their functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for compassionate access to innovative treatments, involving substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/3998), for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions in circumstances where conventional treatments have been unsuccessful, unsuitable, or unavailable.
(2) Regulations made by statutory instrument under this section must make provision for the authorisation, supply, possession, administration and supervision of such treatments, notwithstanding any restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, including provision for—
(a) appropriate clinical and regulatory safeguards,
(b) approval arrangements for participating clinicians, providers and pharmacies, and
(c) case-by-case decision-making having regard to clinical need, patient safety, and available evidence.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a serious or life-threatening condition is defined as a condition involving a substantial risk to life or serious impairment of health or functioning.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make provision for compassionate access to innovative treatments, involving substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions in certain circumstances.
Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert— "(2A) A direction under subsection (1) may relate only to— (a) conditions subject to which sums are paid to the board under section 223G, (b) limits on expenditure or resource use by the board, (c) requirements that sums be used only for specified purposes (including requirements of the kind mentioned in section 223GB), and (d) the payment or repayment of sums to the Secretary of State, and may not specify how the board is to exercise its commissioning functions (within the meaning given by section 5A(2))."
Clause 49, page 34, line 27, at end insert — "(2A) Any objectives set under subsection (1) for an integrated care board form part of its ICB outcomes (see section 14Z61), and the Secretary of State must publish them."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Reducing inequalities in mortality for people with a learning disability and autistic people (1) The Secretary of State must make and maintain arrangements under this section for identifying and reducing inequalities in life expectancy or avoidable mortality experienced by people with a learning disability or autistic people compared with the general population, including arrangements for – (a) detailed reviews of the deaths of people with a learning disability and autistic people, (b) the identification and annual publication, by each integrated care board, of themes, inequalities, service failures and learning arising from those reviews, (c) the annual national aggregation, analysis and independent academic audit of findings from those reviews and integrated care board reports to identify national themes, systemic failures, opportunities for improvement and data gaps, and (d) annual public reporting and oversight by the Secretary of State of the operation and effectiveness of arrangements under this section. (2) The arrangements under subsection (1) must require integrated care boards to– (a) identify deaths falling within the scope of the arrangements, (b) ensure detailed reviews are carried out in accordance with the standard set out in subsection (3), covering at least a nationally specified minimum proportion of deaths set out in subsection (4), (c) ensure deaths meeting the criteria for enhanced scrutiny set out in subsection (5) undergo detailed review, (d) produce, publish, and implement an annual action plan specifying concrete steps and measurable targets to address learning and service failures, (e) provide findings from reviews for national analysis, and (f) publish an annual report in accordance with subsection (6). (3) A detailed review must– (a) be carried out by a reviewer who is independent of any body that provided health or social care to the person in the year before their death, (b) be completed within six months of the integrated care board being notified of the death, (c) include examination of the person’s health and care records, (d) seek the views of a family member, carer or advocate of the person, (e) assess – (i) the quality of the health and social care the person received, (ii) whether reasonable adjustments were made to that care, (iii) whether the death was potentially avoidable, and (iv) any learning for the integrated care board, providers or other bodies, and (f) be recorded in a format common to all integrated care boards, so that reviews are consistent and comparable nationally. (4) In each financial year, each integrated care board must ensure that the number of deaths subject to detailed review is not less than one half of the deaths it identifies under subsection (2)(a), and deaths reviewed under subsection (2)(c) count towards that proportion. (5) The criteria for enhanced scrutiny are that– (a) the person was from an ethnic minority background, (b) the person was autistic and did not have a learning disability, (c) a family member, carer or advocate of the person has requested a detailed review, (d) at the time of their death, the person was detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, deprived of their liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, or an inpatient in a mental health or learning disability setting, or (e) a concern has been raised by any person about the care or treatment the person received. (6) Each integrated care board must produce and publish an annual report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people– (a) the number and proportion of identified deaths subject to detailed review, (b) recurring themes, service failures, and health inequalities, (c) measurable progress made against previous action plans, and (d) significant data gaps and actions required to rectify them. (7) The Secretary of State must ensure that – (a) findings from individual reviews and integrated care board reports are aggregated and analysed nationally at least annually, and (b) the national aggregated findings, data and analysis are audited by an independent academic body to verify their accuracy and ensure independent evaluation prior to publication. (8) The Secretary of State must publish, at least annually, a national report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people– (a) national mortality data, recurring themes, systemic failures, and inequalities, (b) the findings and verification assessment of the independent academic audit conducted under subsection (7)(b),
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Reducing inequalities in mortality for people with a learning disability and autistic people (1) The Secretary of State must make and maintain arrangements under this section for identifying and reducing inequalities in life expectancy or avoidable mortality experienced by people with a learning disability or autistic people compared with the general population, including arrangements for - (a) detailed reviews of the deaths of people with a learning disability and autistic people, (b) the identification and annual publication, by each integrated care board, of themes, inequalities, service failures and learning arising from those reviews, (c) the annual national aggregation, analysis and independent academic audit of findings from those reviews and integrated care board reports to identify national themes, systemic failures, opportunities for improvement and data gaps, and (d) annual public reporting and oversight by the Secretary of State of the operation and effectiveness of arrangements under this section. (2) The arrangements under subsection (1) must require integrated care boards to- (a) identify deaths falling within the scope of the arrangements, (b) ensure detailed reviews are carried out in accordance with the standard set out in subsection (3), covering at least a nationally specified minimum proportion of deaths set out in subsection (4), (c) ensure deaths meeting the criteria for enhanced scrutiny set out in subsection (5) undergo detailed review, (d) produce, publish, and implement an annual action plan specifying concrete steps and measurable targets to address learning and service failures, (e) provide findings from reviews for national analysis, and (f) publish an annual report in accordance with subsection (6). (3) A detailed review must- (a) be carried out by a reviewer who is independent of any body that provided health or social care to the person in the year before their death, (b) be completed within six months of the integrated care board being notified of the death, (c) include examination of the person's health and care records, (d) seek the views of a family member, carer or advocate of the person, (e) assess (i) the quality of the health and social care the person received, (ii) whether reasonable adjustments were made to that care, (iii) whether the death was potentially avoidable, and (iv) any learning for the integrated care board, providers or other bodies, and (f) be recorded in a format common to all integrated care boards, so that reviews are consistent and comparable nationally. (4) In each financial year, each integrated care board must ensure that the number of deaths subject to detailed review is not less than one half of the deaths it identifies under subsection (2)(a), and deaths reviewed under subsection (2)(c) count towards that proportion. (5) The criteria for enhanced scrutiny are that- (a) the person was from an ethnic minority background, (b) the person was autistic and did not have a learning disability, (c) a family member, carer or advocate of the person has requested a detailed review, (d) at the time of their death, the person was detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, deprived of their liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, or an inpatient in a mental health or learning disability setting, or (e) a concern has been raised by any person about the care or treatment the person received. (6) Each integrated care board must produce and publish an annual report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people- (a) the number and proportion of identified deaths subject to detailed review, (b) recurring themes, service failures, and health inequalities, (c) measurable progress made against previous action plans, and (d) significant data gaps and actions required to rectify them. (7) The Secretary of State must ensure that - (a) findings from individual reviews and integrated care board reports are aggregated and analysed nationally at least annually, and (b) the national aggregated findings, data and analysis are audited by an independent academic body to verify their accuracy and ensure independent evaluation prior to publication. (8) The Secretary of State must publish, at least annually, a national report setting out in relation to deaths of people with a learning disability or autistic people- (a) national mortality data, recurring themes, systemic failures, and inequalities, (b) the findings and verification assessment of the independent academic audit conducted under subsection (7)(b), (c) national priorities, mandatory targets, and system-wide actions required for improvement, (d) actions taken or proposed by the Secretary of State, NHS bodies, providers, and regulators, and (e) steps taken to address identified data gaps. (9) Where a report under subsection (6) or (8), or a performance assessment under section 14Z59 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (performance assessment of integrated care boards), indicates recurring service failures, persistent mortality inequalities, or a failure by an integrated care board or NHS body to implement required improvements, the Secretary of State may issue binding directions to that board or body specifying- (a) the mandatory improvement actions required, and (b) the time frame within which those actions must be completed. (10) An integrated care board, NHS trust or NHS foundation trust must comply with any direction given under subsection (9). (11) The Secretary of State must, in respect of each financial year - (a) conduct a review of the operation, effectiveness and impact of arrangements under this section, (b) assess the extent to which relevant bodies have implemented learning and complied with directions, (c) lay the national report and statutory review before Parliament, and (d) make an oral statement to Parliament on the findings of the review and overall progress in reducing avoidable mortality. (12) In conducting a performance assessment of an integrated care board under section 14Z59 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (performance assessment of integrated care boards), the Secretary of State must evaluate the board's compliance with this section and its implementation of directions issued under subsection (9). (13) The Secretary of State must issue statutory guidance on the operation of these arrangements, and integrated care boards and relevant NHS bodies must act in accordance with that guidance. (14) Guidance under subsection (13) - (a) must make provision about- (i) the notification of deaths to integrated care boards, (ii) the training and independence of reviewers, (iii) support for families, carers and advocates during reviews, and (iv) the common format required by subsection (3)(f) (b) may make further provision about the matters in subsections (3) to (5), but may not disapply or reduce any requirement of those subsections, (c) must be published following consultation with people with a learning disability, autistic people, their families and carers, and organisations representing them, and (d) must be laid before Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "De-registration of doctors and health care professionals found to have committed sexual misconduct (1) The Secretary of State must make regulations made by statutory instrument requiring a statutory regulator of a health or care profession to remove from its register any person found to have committed sexual misconduct. (2) Regulations under subsection (1) must provide that removal from the register is the mandatory sanction and may not be replaced by a lesser sanction. (3) In this section, "sexual misconduct" includes sexual abuse, sexual assault, sexual harassment, sexually motivated conduct, and any sexual conduct involving an abuse of a position of professional trust. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 20 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Periodic review of public health system (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that an independent review of the state of the public heath system is conducted at intervals of no more than three years. (2) The Secretary of State must lay a report of each review before Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Integration of voluntary sector and health and social care services in the provision of palliative care (1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to integrate the specialist palliative care provided by the voluntary sector with such services provided by the NHS. (2) Such integration must include, but is not limited to - (a) provision of specialist palliative care support, (b) provision of in-patient palliative care beds when required, (c) sharing of equipment, (d) availability of NHS pharmacy services and supply of medication, (e) collaboration in education and training of the health and social care workforce, and (f) provision of honorary contracts across different providers, to ensure staff mobility as required for patient care. (3) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement specifying how it has complied with this section. (4) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard."
Opposition Amendment 119
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Clause 52, page 36, line 15, after “available” insert “for the purpose of delivering or improving patient health or social care”
This amendment would limit the purpose of the single patient record system to the delivery or improvement of patients’ health care and social care.
Opposition Amendment 123
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Clause 52, page 36, line 18, leave out “health” and insert “direct patient”
This amendment clarifies that the Secretary of State’s regulation-making powers in respect of the single patient record are limited to the provision of direct patient care and social care.
Opposition Amendment 124
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 52, page 36, line 19, at end insert—
“(1A) The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers.”
This amendment would ensure the single patient record is available to all palliative and end-of-life care providers.
Opposition Amendment 125
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Clause 52, page 36, line 28, leave out “including” and insert “solely for the purposes of”
This amendment would ensure that regulations requiring or authorising the making available of patient information through the single patient record system can only make provision in respect of the circumstances set out in the Bill.
Opposition Amendment 132
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Clause 52, page 36, leave out lines 38 to 40
This amendment would remove the power for regulations to provide that processing information in accordance with them does not breach any obligation of confidence.
None 134
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert—
“(4A) In making the regulations the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure—
(a) that adult social care providers and people drawing on care are represented in the design of shared care records, the single patient record, interoperability standards and the wider analogue-to-digital shift;
(b) that a clear national route for relevant social care data is made available to authorised health and care professionals without requiring separate local integrations for every provider and area.”
The amendment is designed to ensure that in establishing a single patient record, this should embrace relevant social care data and that adult social care providers and people drawing on care are represented in its design.
Opposition Amendment 138
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 52, page 37, line 9, at end insert—
“(b) lay an assessment before Parliament on the readiness of the National Health Service to implement the single patient record. This assessment must include—
(i) the interoperability, cybersecurity and operational resilience of relevant systems,
(ii) compliance with data protection requirements,
(iii) workforce and training requirements,
(iv) the adequacy of hardware, connectivity and identity-management systems,
(v) the estimated implementation and recurring costs,
(vi) the capital funding to be made available to providers requiring upgrades,
(vii) the measures to be taken to prevent digital exclusion, and
(viii) a summary of any relevant independent technical, cybersecurity and data protection assurance obtained by the Secretary of State.”
This amendment would prevent the first regulations establishing the single patient record from being made until the Secretary of State has laid before Parliament an assessment of the NHS’s digital and operational readiness, including infrastructure, cybersecurity, workforce, costs, capital funding and digital exclusion.
Opposition Amendment 144
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS ownership of connection software
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is NHS ownership of any data connector software architecture used as part of the delivery of the NHS single patient record under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) or the NHS Federated Data Platform.
(2) In this section, a data connector means an interface or connection between the NHS Federated Data Platform and any other health system.”
This new clause would require the NHS to own any software connecting the NHS Federated Data Platform to other health systems.
Opposition Amendment 145
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Single patient record: right to opt out
(1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must enable a patient to opt out of—
(a) information relating to them being made available through the system established under those regulations, or
(b) such information being used for any purpose other than their direct care.
(2) The regulations must enable a patient to opt out, or to withdraw an opt-out, at any time and free of charge—
(a) through their GP practice,
(b) electronically, or
(c) by other means accessible to persons without internet access.
(3) The regulations may not permit an opt-out to be overridden except where required by an order of a court or where necessary to protect the patient’s life.”
This new clause would give patients a statutory right to opt out of the single patient record, or of their information being used for purposes other than their direct care. Patients could opt out through their GP practice, online (for example through the NHS App) or by other accessible means, and an opt-out could be overridden only by court order or to protect life.
Opposition Amendment 146
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Single patient record: access logs and audit
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that a record is kept of each occasion on which patient information is accessed or otherwise processed by means of the system established under regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) (“the single patient record”), setting out—
(a) the person or organisation by whom it was accessed or processed,
(b) the date and time it was accessed or process,
(c) the information accessed or processed, and
(d) the purpose for which it was accessed or processed.
(2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a patient is able to view, free of charge and by electronic means, the record kept under subsection (1) in relation to information about them.
(3) The Secretary of State must publish, at least once every three months, a register of each disclosure of patient information obtained from or derived from the single patient record for purposes other than direct care, including research, setting out—
(a) the recipient,
(b) the purpose,
(c) the legal basis for the disclosure,
(d) whether the information disclosed was identifiable, pseudonymised or anonymised, and
(e) the date of the disclosure and the period for which the information may be retained.
(4) The Secretary of State must arrange for an independent audit, at least once in each financial year, of access to and processing of patient information by means of the single patient record, and must lay a report of each audit before Parliament.”
This new clause would require access to the single patient record to be logged and visible to patients, a quarterly published register of disclosures for purposes other than direct care including research, and an annual independent audit reported to Parliament.
Opposition Amendment 147
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Ownership of data connectors and prevention of supplier lock-in
(1) Any data connector used in connection with the system established under regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) (“the single patient record”) or the NHS Federated Data Platform must—
(a) be owned by the Secretary of State or an NHS body, including all intellectual property rights in it, and
(b) conform to open standards published by the Secretary of State.
(2) A contract for the provision of an information system which processes patient information on behalf of the Secretary of State or an NHS body may not—
(a) confer on the supplier any intellectual property right in a data connector, or
(b) restrict the transfer of patient information, or of any data connector, to another supplier.
(3) A contract within subsection (2) must require the supplier, on the expiry or termination of the contract, to provide all patient information and associated metadata held under it in an open, machine-readable format within 90 days and at no additional cost.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) apply to any contract entered into or extended after the coming into force of this section.
(5) In this section “data connector” means software, or an interface, which enables patient information to be transferred between the single patient record or the NHS Federated Data Platform and any other information system.”
This new clause would require the NHS to own all data connectors used with the single patient record and the Federated Data Platform, require open standards, and prevent supplier contracts from creating lock-in.
Opposition Amendment 156
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)Schedule 8, page 122, line 1, leave out paragraph 23 and insert—
“23 For section 274A (Secretary of State’s guidance about NHS England data functions) substitute—
“274A Secretary of State’s guidance in respect of their data functions
(1) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the exercise of—
(a) their relevant data functions, and
(b) their other functions in connection with their relevant data functions.
(2) Before publishing guidance under this section the Secretary of State must consult any other persons that the Secretary of State considers appropriate in relation to the guidance.
(3) The Secretary of State must have regard to the guidance published under this section.””
This amendment would transfer the existing statutory requirement for published guidance about data functions from NHS England to the Secretary of State.
Opposition Amendment 158
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Privacy by design in NHS Federated Data Platform architecture
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is privacy by design as part of the delivery of the NHS Federated Data Platform architecture.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), privacy by design includes—
(a) patient data anonymisation outside its usage by clinicians and within the National Data Integration Tenant; and
(b) patient consent for the processing of personal information by NHS.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to ensure that the NHS Federated Data Platform is designed to protect privacy. This would include anonymising patient data outside clinical use and requiring patient consent to the processing of personal information.
Opposition Amendment 159
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Retendering of contract for the NHS Federated Data Platform
The Secretary of State must, before February 2027, commence a competitive retendering for the contract to provide the NHS Federated Data Platform.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to begin a competitive retendering process for the NHS Federated Data Platform contract before February 2027.
Opposition Amendment 160
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“NHS contracting for IT or data services
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a governance framework for the contracting of any IT or data services by any NHS organisation or by the Department of Health and Social Care for the purposes of the provision of health and social care services.
(2) The framework established under subsection (1) must include the following provisions—
(a) a party may not bid for any contract for services where such services have previously been provided by the party on a free trial basis;
(b) the automatic extension of contracts is subject to audit by the National Audit Office;
(c) contract terms must include provision for the department or NHS organisation to take ownership of any bespoke system built or developed by the contractor during the delivery of the contract;
(d) the department or NHS organisation must, at the end of the contract period (or following any extensions) conduct a competitive retendering process;
(e) where a retendering process takes place under subsection (2)(d), the contractor may not assist in the preparation of the contract specification.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to establish by regulations a governance framework for IT and data contracts in the Department of Health and Social Care and the NHS. The framework would, among other things, bar suppliers who have provided services on a free trial from bidding for the contract, secure NHS ownership of bespoke systems, and require retendering at the end of each contract.
None 175
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“National respite care scheme
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a national respite care scheme.
(2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer under any enactment for the time being in force in England, an assessment by the local authority of whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities;
(b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to—
(i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing,
(ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and
(iii) participate in family and community life;
(c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring.
(3) Under subsection (2), “support” may include—
(a) replacement care for the cared-for person;
(b) respite services;
(c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support.
(4) The Secretary of State must provide sufficient support to local authorities to ensure the scheme under subsection (1) is delivered in every local authority.
(5) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to establish a National Respite Care Scheme.
None 176
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause—
“A right to a break for unpaid carers
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a national scheme to provide breaks for unpaid carers.
(2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer under any enactment for the time being in force in England, an assessment by the local authority of whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities;
(b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to—
(i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing,
(ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and
(iii) participate in family and community life;
(c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring.
(3) Under subsection (2), “support” may include—
(a) replacement care for the cared-for person;
(b) respite services;
(c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support.
(4) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to provide financial assistance to local authorities for the purposes of delivering the scheme under subsection (1).
(5) In this section “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to establish a national scheme giving unpaid carers a right to breaks from caring, with local authorities assessing whether carers can take sufficient breaks and the Secretary of State providing financial assistance to local authorities to deliver it.
Opposition Amendment 184
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)Clause 64, page 46, line 37, at end insert—
“(8B) Provision made by virtue of subsection (8A) for the period to be determined by NICE or the Secretary of State may only apply—
(a) in relation to a particular recommendation, and
(b) where NICE or the Secretary of State (as the case may be) is satisfied that exceptional circumstances make it appropriate for a different period to that specified in subsection (8C) to apply to that recommendation.
(8C) Except in the case of a determination in relation to a particular recommendation under subsection (8B), regulations under this section may not provide for the period within which a recommendation, or recommendations of a specified description, are to be complied with to exceed 90 days.
(8D) Provision made by virtue of subsection (8A) for the period to be determined by NICE or the Secretary of State must require NICE or the Secretary of State, before making a determination in relation to a recommendation, to—
(a) follow a process consistent with the procedures established by NICE under subsection (7)(a) for making that recommendation,
(b) consult the manufacturer or supplier of any health technology to which the recommendation relates and such other persons, including organisations representing patients and clinicians, as NICE or the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and
(c) publish the determination and the reasons for it.”
This amendment seeks to limits any power to vary the standard 90-day period for complying with a NICE recommendation to individual recommendations in exceptional circumstances. It requires any decision to vary the standard period to follow a process aligned with NICE procedures.
None 203
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Lab)After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause—
“Reclassification of injectable medicinal products
(1) The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/1916) are amended as follows.
(2) In regulation 62 (classification of UK marketing authorisation or parallel import licence), after paragraph (3), insert—
“(3A) Paragraph (3)(d) does not prevent the licensing authority from considering or granting an application to vary a UK marketing authorisation so as to classify a medicinal product intended and authorised for self-administration by parenteral administration as a pharmacy medicine, where the licensing authority is satisfied that the product does not meet any of the criteria for prescription-only classification specified in paragraph (3)(a) to (c).
(3B) Any application for reclassification under paragraph (3A) must be assessed individually by the licensing authority in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements.”
(3) In Schedule 1 (further provisions for classification of medicinal products), in Part 1, paragraph 1(a), after “administration” insert “, unless the licensing authority is satisfied that the conditions in regulation 62(3A) are met”.”
None 207
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019
Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review on progress made in increasing organ transplants since the passage of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to undertake a review of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019.
None 209
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 19 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Human Tissue Authority: guidance and code of practice
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, by order under section 14(4) of the Human Tissue Act 2004, require the Authority to amend its guidance and codes of practice to ensure they—
(a) reflect the passage of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019, and
(b) adopt a best interests decision-making approach in relation to a potential donor.
(2) Best interests decision-making approach in (1) is defined as a duty to seek out and consider a person’s wishes, feelings, beliefs, and values.”
This amendment is designed to ensure that the approach of the Human Tissue Authority on consent for retrieval of organs and tissues is consistent with the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019.
None 210
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Report on the duty to cooperate
(1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on—
(a) the operation of the duty to co-operate under section 72 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (co-operation between NHS bodies) and section 82 of that Act (co-operation between NHS bodies and local authorities), and
(b) the impact of those duties on the integration of health and social care in England.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider co-operation between—
(a) relevant NHS bodies, and
(b) relevant NHS bodies and local authorities in the delivery and commissioning of health and social care.
(3) Within twelve months of the report under subsection (1) being laid, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make provision to update guidance on the duty to co-operate, and
(b) implement actions to strengthen integration in the report which the Secretary of State considers most appropriate.”
The amendment would place a requirement on the Secretary of State to report to Parliament, within six months of the Act passing, on how well NHS bodies and local authorities are working together to integrate health and social care in England. It would also place a requirement on the Secretary of State to update the related guidance and take action to strengthen this cooperation six months later.
None 211
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Value-based procurement
The Secretary of State must produce an annual report to Parliament on progress made in the adoption in England of value-based procurement of medical devices, consumables and services by the National Health Service and the social care sector.”
The amendment would require the Secretary of State to produce an annual report to parliament on progress made in the adoption of value-based procurement.
None 212
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 19 Oct 2026After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“National wheelchairs standards
(1) The Secretary of State must, within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a set of national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision to be implemented by integrated care boards in their commissioning of wheelchair services.
(2) The national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision must be revised at least once every five years from the date of the previous publication.
(3) The national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision may cover the following areas as determined by the Secretary of State—
(a) wheelchair pathways embracing assessment and provision of wheelchairs, including seating and associated accessories to support people's mobility and postural needs;
(b) the steps to be taken to engage with users of wheelchair services to ensure that lived experience is fully taken account;
(c) steps to be taken to ensure that responsive roadside assistance is available to ensure that no user is left stranded when away from their place of residence;
(d) the principles of quality to be used to develop local service specifications and to benchmark current commissioning and provision;
(e) such other matters as may be specified by the Secretary of State.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a set of national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision to be followed by Integrated Care Boards in their commissioning of wheelchair services.
None 213
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“State of NHS dentistry report
(1) The Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the state of NHS dentistry in England (“the State of Dentistry Report”) at least once every three years.
(2) The State of Dentistry Report must include an assessment of—
(a) access to NHS dental services and levels of unmet need,
(b) the adequacy, distribution and sustainability of the NHS dental workforce, including general dental services, community dental services, hospital dental services, dental public health consultants and dental academia,
(c) geographical inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes,
(d) inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes between different socioeconomic groups and populations, including but not limited to people living in care homes and people experiencing homelessness,
(e) demand and waiting times for dental treatment in community dental services and secondary care,
(f) the extent to which inadequate access to NHS dental services contributes to avoidable pressure on other parts of the NHS, including primary medical care, urgent and emergency care, hospital services and the prescribing of medicines, and
(g) the measures required to address any deficiencies or inequalities identified under paragraphs (a) to (f).
(3) The report must include such indicators as the Secretary of State considers appropriate for assessing each of the matters set out in subsection (2), and those indicators must, wherever appropriate, be presented in a manner that enables comparisons to be made between different areas and populations and over time, including by reference to population size, full-time equivalent workforce and other relevant measures.
(4) In preparing the report, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure that NHS dental services are sufficient to meet the current and projected need for dental care in England.
(5) The Secretary of State must, within six months of publishing a State of Dentistry Report, set out the measures the Government intends to take in response to the findings of the report.
(6) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for each State of Dentistry Report, and the Government's response to it, to be debated in each House of Parliament.
(7) The first State of Dentistry Report must be published within 24 months of the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish and lay before Parliament a regular report on the state of NHS dentistry in England and require the Government to respond to each report and ensure that both the report and response are debated in Parliament.
None 98
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert—
“(2B) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards must have regard to the need to improve outcomes for adults with needs for care and to support unpaid carers, including in relation to the matters specified in section 1(2) of the Care Act 2014 (promoting individual well-being).
(2C) A neighbourhood health plan must explain how the arrangements proposed in the plan are expected to contribute to the outcomes of adults with needs for care, including in relation to—
(a) personal dignity and physical and mental health,
(b) independence and control over day-to-day life,
(c) domestic, family and personal relationships,
(d) participation in work, education, training, recreation and community life, and
(e) the suitability of living accommodation.”
This amendment would explicitly connect neighbourhood health planning with the social care purposes of the Care Act 2014. It would require the statutory partners to consider how the joint plan contributes to improving outcomes for adults with care needs and to supporting unpaid carers, beyond NHS activity and service-flow measures.
Opposition Amendment 185
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 64, insert the following new Clause—
“NICE recommendations: integrated care board financial duties
In section 237 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (advice, guidance, information and recommendations), after subsection (8A) (inserted by section 64 of this Act) insert—
“(8B) Where provision made under subsection (8)(b) requires an integrated care board to comply with a recommendation, an integrated care board may not rely on a financial objective set under section 223L of the National Health Service Act 2006 (joint financial objectives for integrated care boards etc), or on section 223GC of that Act (financial duties of integrated care boards: expenditure limits), as grounds for refusing or delaying compliance with the recommendation, unless the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (8C) permitting it to do so.
(8C) The Secretary of State may give an integrated care board a direction permitting it to defer compliance with a recommendation with which it is required to comply by virtue of provision made under subsection (8)(b) for a specified period, but only if satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify the deferral.
(8D) A direction under subsection (8C) must—
(a) specify the exceptional circumstances on which it is based, and
(b) be published, together with the Secretary of State’s reasons for giving it.””
This amendment would provide that an integrated care board’s financial duties cannot be grounds for refusing or delaying funding for NICE-recommended treatments, unless the Secretary of State has directed otherwise in exceptional circumstances and by published direction.
None 198
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause—
“National patient experience and feedback function
(1) The Secretary of State must secure arrangements for the exercise of a national patient experience and feedback function in relation to health services and social care services in England.
(2) The national patient experience and feedback function is to—
(a) gather, analyse and publish evidence about the experiences of patients, carers and service users of health services and social care services;
(b) identify and report on recurring concerns arising from those experiences;
(c) identify and report on inequalities in access, experience and outcomes;
(d) identify and report on the extent to which the views obtained reflect the diversity of the population served, including groups whose views have not been adequately captured;
(e) make recommendations for improvement to the Secretary of State, integrated care boards, local authorities, the Care Quality Commission and such other bodies as the Secretary of State considers appropriate;
(f) provide a route for concerns arising from local patient, carer and service user voice arrangements to be escalated to national bodies.
(3) Arrangements under subsection (1) must secure—
(a) accessible routes for patients, carers, service users and the public to share views and concerns;
(b) specific arrangements to obtain and consider the views of people and communities who experience health inequalities, social exclusion, multiple disadvantage or other barriers to engagement and participation;
(c) arrangements for working with voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations;
(d) arrangements enabling findings, reports and recommendations to be published without prior approval by any body to which they relate;
(e) arrangements for recommendations made under subsection (2)(e) to receive a published response from the body to which the recommendation is made.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each financial year, a report setting out—
(a) the principal findings of the national patient experience and feedback function;
(b) recurring concerns identified under subsection (2)(b);
(c) inequalities identified under subsection (2)(c);
(d) groups whose views have not been adequately captured;
(e) recommendations made under subsection (2)(e);
(f) responses received and action taken in response to those recommendations;
(g) cases where no response, or no sufficient response, has been received;
(h) an assessment of the impact of action taken in response to recommendations made in previous financial years.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to secure a national function for gathering, publishing and escalating patient, carer and service-user experience evidence, and would require bodies receiving recommendations to publish a response.
None 199
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health Service Commissioner
In section 1 of the Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 (the Commissioner), after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) The office of Health Service Commissioner for England cannot be held by the person who holds the office of Parliamentary Commissioner (as defined by the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967).””
This amendment seeks separate out the posts of Parliamentary Service Commissioner and Health Service Commissioner.
None 232
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting on outcomes for children
(1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 14Z58 (integrated care boards: annual report), after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) An annual report must also include—
(a) a statement of outcomes for children in the board’s area during the financial year, by reference to the indicators specified under section (Reporting on outcomes for children)(4)(a) of the Health Act 2026,
(b) a statement of the targeted investment made by the board during the financial year, by reference to the guidance specified under section (Reporting on outcomes for children)(4)(b) of the Health Act 2026, setting out the purposes for which it was allocated and the indicators to which it relates,
(c) an explanation of the statement under paragraphs (a) and (b), including changes to outcomes and targeted investment from the previous financial year and any steps the board proposes to take as a result, and
(d) an explanation of the relationship between the board’s targeted investment and outcomes for children.
(4B) In subsection (4A)—
“children” means persons under the age of 18;
“targeted investment” means expenditure allocated by the Secretary of State or an integrated care board for the purpose of improving outcomes for children by reference to the indicators specified under subsection (4) of section (Reporting on outcomes for children) of the Health Act 2026.”
(3) The Secretary of State must, as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year, prepare and lay before Parliament a report on health-related outcomes of and targeted investment for children in England.
(4) The Secretary of State must specify and publish—
(a) indicators of outcomes for children, and
(b) the expenditure that is, or is not, to be treated as targeted investment,
for the purposes of this section and section 14Z58(4A) of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(5) A report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) a statement of outcomes for children in England, and in each integrated care board area, by reference to the indicators specified under subsection (4),
(b) a statement of the amount of targeted investment made during the financial year by the Secretary of State and by each integrated care board, and of the change from the previous financial year,
(c) an assessment of the relationship between targeted investment and outcomes for children,
(d) an assessment of variation in outcomes and targeted investment between integrated care board areas, and of changes since the previous financial year, and
(e) a statement of any steps the Secretary of State proposes to take as a result.
(6) Before specifying indicators under subsection (4)(a) or publishing guidance under subsection (4)(b), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including persons with expertise in child health.
(7) The first report under subsection (3) must relate to the first full financial year beginning after the day on which this section comes into force.”
This new clause would require integrated care boards and the Secretary of State to report annually on outcomes for children in their area against nationally specified indicators and on the investment they make specifically to improve those outcomes.
None 234
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“National Wheelchairs Commissioner
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a National Wheelchairs Commissioner.
(2) The functions of the National Wheelchairs Commissioner are to—
(a) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality, procurement and provision of NHS wheelchair services;
(b) provide leadership to NHS wheelchair services;
(c) maintain a database of the NHS provision of wheelchairs;
(d) monitor integrated care boards’ adoption of national standards established by the Secretary of State under section (National wheelchairs standards);
(e) encourage the adoption of good practices in NHS wheelchair commissioning;
(f) encourage the introduction of innovative wheelchair equipment in the NHS;
(g) liaise with the National Wheelchairs Advisory committee as established under section (National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee);
(h) perform such other duties as may be prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State by statutory instrument.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to appoint a National Wheelchairs Commissioner to oversee NHS wheelchair services.
None 235
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish an independent advisory committee for NHS wheelchair commissioning and provision to be known as the National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee (“the Committee”).
(2) The responsibilities of the Committee are to advise the Secretary of State and the National Wheelchairs Commissioner on all aspects of NHS wheelchair commissioning and provision, as prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State by statutory instrument.
(3) The Secretary of State may refer specific matters to the Committee for consideration and advice.
(4) Schedule (National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee) sets out the arrangements regarding membership, terms of office and other governance matters.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
LORD PATEL
Baroness Manzoor (Con)Clause 4, page 3, line 24, leave out “have regard to the need to”
LORD PATEL
Baroness Cass (XB)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert— "(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England in respect of life expectancy or general state of health which are wholly or partly the result of differences in respect of general health determinants."
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 19 Oct 2026After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause— "Health inequalities strategy (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health inequalities strategy. (2) In preparing the strategy under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (3) A Minister of the Crown must, in exercising the Minister’s functions, have regard to the strategy."
Clause 10, page 6, line 21, at end insert ", and there is a defined capacity failure or a need to respond to an emergency. (2) Where the Secretary of State considers it appropriate to vary the provision of health services, they must publish a written statement setting out— (a) their reasons, and (b) evidence demonstrating that the conditions in subsection (1) have been met."
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 19 Oct 2026After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— "Duty of Secretary of State to obtain appropriate advice The Secretary of State must obtain advice appropriate for enabling the Secretary of State to discharge effectively the Secretary of State’s functions in relation to the health service from persons who (taken together) have a broad range of professional expertise in— (a) the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness, and (b) the protection or improvement of public health."
LORD PATEL
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB)Clause 22, page 16, line 25, at end insert— "(4A) The constitution must provide for the ordinary members of the integrated care board to include— (a) at least one qualified, professionally registered, consultant in public health who provides wholly independent, transparent, leadership and advice to the board on preventing and reducing disease and improving the health of the population it serves, (b) at least two clinicians with current experience of providing primary care services, at least on of whom is a general practitioner, and (c) at least one medical practitioner with current experience of providing secondary care services. (4B) A person appointed under sub-paragraph (5) must not be appointed to represent the interests of a provider organisation whose services are commissioned by the integrated care board."
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— "Duty of integrated care boards to commission stalking-related healthcare services (1) Each integrated care board must make arrangements to commission, participate in or provide funding for public health services for victims of stalking within its area. (2) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must have the objectives of— (a) reducing physical and psychological harm to victims and others affected by stalking, (b) identifying, assessing and addressing the clinical, psychological and psychiatric factors associated with stalking perpetration, and (c) reducing demand upon health and social care services arising from stalking-related harm. (3) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must include— (a) specialist healthcare and psychological support for victims of stalking, (b) specialist clinical assessment, treatment and therapeutic intervention for perpetrators of stalking where indicated, (c) structured multi-agency physical and mental health risk assessments, and (d) information sharing between relevant healthcare agencies. (4) The duties under this section apply regardless of whether the stalking behaviour falls within the definition of domestic abuse under section 1 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (definition of “domestic abuse”). (5) In fulfilling its duties under this section, an integrated care board must cooperate with— (a) police forces and local policing bodies, (b) local authorities, (c) probation services, (d) mental health providers, (e) NHS trusts and primary care providers, and (f) relevant voluntary and community sector organisations. (6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance concerning the discharge of duties under this section, including guidance on— (a) evidence-based multi-agency ways of working, (b) health service responses to stalking victims, (c) clinical assessment and treatment pathways for stalking perpetrators, and (d) the collection and publication of outcome data, including health impacts and cost-benefit measures. (7) In preparing guidance under subsection (6), the Secretary of State must consult organisations with expertise in stalking, mental health and public health. (8) In this section, “stalking” has the meaning given in section 2A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (offence of stalking)."
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— “Duty of integrated care boards to commission stalking-related healthcare services (1) Each integrated care board must make arrangements to commission, participate in or provide funding for public health services for victims of stalking within its area. (2) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must have the objectives of— (a) reducing physical and psychological harm to victims and others affected by stalking, (b) identifying, assessing and addressing the clinical, psychological and psychiatric factors associated with stalking perpetration, and (c) reducing demand upon health and social care services arising from stalking-related harm. (3) The arrangements referred to in subsection (1) must include— (a) specialist healthcare and psychological support for victims of stalking, (b) specialist clinical assessment, treatment and therapeutic intervention for perpetrators of stalking where indicated, (c) structured multi-agency physical and mental health risk assessments, and (d) information sharing between relevant healthcare agencies. (4) The duties under this section apply regardless of whether the stalking behaviour falls within the definition of domestic abuse under section 1 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (definition of “domestic abuse”). (5) In fulfilling its duties under this section, an integrated care board must cooperate with— (a) police forces and local policing bodies, (b) local authorities, (c) probation services, (d) mental health providers, (e) NHS trusts and primary care providers, and (f) relevant voluntary and community sector organisations. (6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance concerning the discharge of duties under this section, including guidance on— (a) evidence-based multi-agency ways of working, (b) health service responses to stalking victims, (c) clinical assessment and treatment pathways for stalking perpetrators, and (d) the collection and publication of outcome data, including health impacts and cost-benefit measures. (7) In preparing guidance under subsection (6), the Secretary of State must consult organisations with expertise in stalking, mental health and public health. (8) In this section, “stalking” has the meaning given in section 2A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (offence of stalking).”
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 19 Oct 2026Clause 52, page 36, line 38, leave out from “regulations” to “any” in line 39 and insert “must provide that the processing of information in accordance with the regulations complies with”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause— “Protection of confidential psychological therapy records (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument provide for safeguards governing the inclusion of information relating to psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies in the single patient record. (2) The regulations must provide that detailed narrative records of psychotherapy, counselling or other psychological therapies may not be routinely disclosed through the single patient record to health or social care professionals unless the patient has given explicit and informed consent to the disclosure. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply where disclosure is necessary to address an immediate risk to the life, safety or wellbeing of the patient or another person. (4) Any disclosure under subsection (3) must be limited to the information reasonably necessary for that purpose, and the reasons for the disclosure must be recorded. (5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Fixed recoverable costs in clinical negligence claims (1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must decide whether to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for clinical negligence claims in which the value of damages is £25,000 or less. (2) Within the period specified in subsection (1), the Secretary of State must lay before each House of Parliament a statement setting out the decision made under that subsection. (3) The statement must confirm that the Secretary of State has decided either - (a) to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for such claims, or (b) not to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs for such claims. (4) Where the Secretary of State has decided to proceed with the introduction of fixed recoverable costs, the statement must set out - (a) the principal features of the proposed scheme, and (b) the proposed timetable for its implementation. (5) In this section, "fixed recoverable costs" means provision fixing the amount of legal costs recoverable in respect of a clinical negligence claim."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Research into innovative treatments involving controlled substances (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument take steps to enable and support the development of research relating to innovative treatments, which use substances listed in Schedule 1 to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/3998). (2) Regulations made under this section must make provision, for - (a) the lawful possession, supply, administration, production and importation of such substances for the purposes of clinical trials or other research activities approved in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary of State, notwithstanding any prohibition or restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, and (b) proportionate and timely arrangements relating to the approval, licensing and oversight of authorised research activities under this section. (3) Provision under subsection (2) applies to- (a) approved research bodies, (b) authorised researchers, (c) participating healthcare providers, and (d) specified substances used for approved research purposes, and does not alter the schedule or classification of a substance. (4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Compassionate access to innovative treatments (1) In exercising their functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for compassionate access to innovative treatments, involving substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/3998), for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions in circumstances where conventional treatments have been unsuccessful, unsuitable, or unavailable. (2) Regulations made by statutory instrument under this section must make provision for the authorisation, supply, possession, administration and supervision of such treatments, notwithstanding any restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, including provision for- (a) appropriate clinical and regulatory safeguards, (b) approval arrangements for participating clinicians, providers and pharmacies, and (c) case-by-case decision-making having regard to clinical need, patient safety, and available evidence. (3) For the purposes of this section, a serious or life-threatening condition is defined as a condition involving a substantial risk to life or serious impairment of health or functioning. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament."
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 10 stand part of the Bill.
This is to probe the reasons behind this Clause and the Government’s intentions with regard to private sector involvement in the NHS.
Opposition Amendment 43
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) - Shadow Minister (Treasury)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 16 Oct 2026After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Promoting continuity of care
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1A insert—
“1AA Duty to promote continuity of care
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must promote continuity of care for patients by health professionals.””
This amendment seeks to ensure continuity of care for patients by health professionals, including by GPs and in hospitals.
Opposition Amendment 87
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to—
(a) service redesign,
(b) integration of health services,
(c) development of neighbourhood health services, and
(d) population health planning.
(2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) community pharmacy contractors,
(c) providers of primary dental services, and
(d) providers of ophthalmic services and registered medical practitioners with specialist expertise in ophthalmology.
(3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes—
(a) involvement at an early stage in the development of integrated care board proposals,
(b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in integrated care board functions,
(c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence integrated care board decision making, and
(d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of integrated care board functions.
(4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing—
(a) how it has complied with this section, and
(b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the integrated care board.
(5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This new clause seeks to ensure that a certain range of primary care providers are consulted by integrated care boards in the development of their healthcare plans.
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 30 stand part of the Bill.
This opposition to Clause 30 seeks to probe the reasoning behind abolishing the governing bodies of NHS Foundation Trusts and to find out what alternative accountability arrangements will be made.
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 65 stand part of the Bill.
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 66 stand part of the Bill.
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 67 stand part of the Bill.
Baroness Pidgeon gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 70 stand part of the Bill.
This amendment removes the Clause abolishing Healthwatch England.
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Schedule 10 be the tenth Schedule to the Bill.
Baroness Pidgeon gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Clause 71 stand part of the Bill.
This amendment removes the Clause abolishing arrangements with Local Healthwatch organisations.
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 16 Oct 2026Baroness Pidgeon gives notice of her intention to oppose the Question that Schedule 11 be the eleventh Schedule to the Bill.
This amendment removes the Schedule abolishing Local Healthwatch organisations.
Opposition Amendment 195
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“National Maternity Commissioner
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a National Maternity Commissioner, based within the Department of Health and Social Care.
(2) The functions of the National Maternity Commissioner are to—
(a) oversee NHS maternity services,
(b) act as an independent voice for women and families,
(c) ensure lessons are learned from identified failures and that the recommendations of maternity reviews are acted upon,
(d) promote consistency, safety and accountability across NHS maternity services, and
(e) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality and provision of maternity services in England.
(3) The person appointed as Commissioner must—
(a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role,
(b) have first-hand experience of working in maternity services, so far as reasonably possible, and
(c) not be a Member of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to appoint a maternity commissioner within the Department of Health and Social Care to oversee national maternity services. This person should be someone with experience and expertise of maternity services, and not a political appointment.
Opposition Amendment 196
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Maternity safety
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated “good” or “outstanding” by the Care Quality Commission.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes—
(a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward,
(b) one-to-one midwifery care,
(c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service,
(d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and
(e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan.
(3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme.”
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to create a scheme to ensure that every maternity unit in the country achieves a “good” or “outstanding” rating by the CQC.
Opposition Amendment 215
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Independence of appointments
The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that operational decisions regarding the appointment, suspension or removal of—
(a) chairs, directors and non-executive directors of NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, and
(b) chief executives of integrated care boards,
are made exclusively by persons employed in the Civil Service, upon strictly merit-based criteria.”
This new clause would ensure that any decisions over NHS trusts and ICB leadership are made by civil servants, rather than the Secretary of State, in order to ensure appointments are made on merit.
Opposition Amendment 216
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Access to dental provision: dental deserts
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a scheme to improve access to dental provision (“the scheme”).
(2) The purpose of the scheme is to end dental deserts.
(3) A “dental desert” is any local authority area with fewer than ten active dental practices per 100,000 people.
(4) The scheme must make provision to support integrated care boards to—
(a) guarantee emergency access to an NHS dentist,
(b) provide free dental check ups for—
(i) children,
(ii) mothers within one year of having given birth,
(iii) pregnant women, and
(iv) low-income households, and
(c) guarantee dental appointments for persons commencing—
(i) surgery,
(ii) chemotherapy, or
(iii) transplant procedures.
(5) The Secretary of State must, before publishing the scheme, issue a reformed dental contract.
(6) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the establishment of the scheme, publish a dental workforce plan to support delivery of the scheme.”
This new clause seeks to establish a scheme to support integrated care boards to end dental deserts.
None 21
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 5, page 3, line 34, after “carers” insert “, health and care partners,”
This amendment seeks to ensure that health and care partners can be involved in decisions about a patient.
None 28
Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Con)LORD PATEL
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Con)Clause 7, page 4, line 31 at end insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must publish an independently verified long-term assessment of the workforce needs of the health service and a ten year education and training plan to deliver on those needs.
(1B) The first assessment and plan under subsection (1A) must be published within one month of the day on which this Act is passed.
(1C) The Secretary of State must keep the assessment and plan under review and revise both at least once every five years.”
None 34
Baroness Coffey (Con)Clause 10, page 6, line 21, leave out “the health service” and insert “patients”
This shifts the emphasis by acting on what is in the best interest of patients’ needs rather than the organisation.
Opposition Amendment 218
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Right to a GP appointment
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to provide every patient with the right to receive a GP appointment within seven days of seeking one, or 24 hours if urgent.
(2) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/2996) to make the right described in subsection (1) a right in the NHS constitution.
(3) The Secretary of State may review the scheme every three years from the day on which this Act is passed and amend it through regulations made by statutory instrument.
(4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) For the purposes of this section—
“GP appointment” means an appointment with an appropriate clinician within a GP practice;
“urgent” has the current definition provided under general practitioner triaging protocols.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to give patients a new right in the NHS constitution to receive a GP appointment in 7 days, or 24 hours if urgent, and to establish a scheme to deliver this.
None 44
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Secretary of State’s duty as to social care
(1) Section 1 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (Secretary of State’s duty to promote comprehensive health service) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, at the end insert “and social care”.
(3) After subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) The Secretary of State must promote in England social care designed to secure improvement in outcomes for those who receive it.””
This amendment would extend the Secretary of State’s core duty in section 1 of the National Health Service Act 2006 to cover social care, so that the duty matches the ministerial title. It reflects section 2 of the Health and Social Care (Reform) Act (Northern Ireland) 2009.
None 45
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Promoting palliative care equitably
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty to promote palliative care equitably
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure provision of palliative care across England accessible to all regardless of wealth or geography.””
None 46
Baroness Coffey (Con)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Support for older patients
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty to support older patients
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure adequate care for older patients, considering the prevention of ill health by the provision of health visitors focused on people aged 75 and above.””
None 227
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Wheelchair services: standards, performance and outcomes
(1) Each integrated care board must adopt national standards in accordance with section (National wheelchairs standards) which apply in its area in relation to the assessment for and supply of wheelchair services.
(2) Each integrated care board must monitor its performance against the standards under subsection (1).
(3) Each integrated care board must publish an annual report including—
(a) its performance against the standards under subsection (1),
(b) waiting times for the assessment for and supply of NHS wheelchair services,
(c) the number and proportion of people waiting longer than 18 weeks for such equipment or services,
(d) outcomes achieved for people by the provision of NHS wheelchair services, and
(e) steps taken by the integrated care board to improve the assessment for, and supply of, NHS wheelchair services.”
This new clause would require each integrated care board to adopt national standards which apply in its area in relation to the assessment for and supply of wheelchair services and publish an annual report on their adherence to these.
Opposition Amendment 228
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)LORD PATEL
Lord Stevens of Birmingham (XB)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Cancer treatment: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral for such treatment.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS constitution for England for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral for such treatment.
(3) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme to support NHS hospital trusts in meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(4) As part of the scheme, the Secretary of State must expand the capacity of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
(5) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to Parliament on progress on meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(6) Any statement made under subsection (5) should be made as close as reasonably practicable to 4 February.
(7) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would give patients a right under the NHS constitution to start cancer treatment within 62 days of referral and requires the Secretary of State to establish a scheme to deliver this. It also requires the Secretary of State to update the House on progress against the target on or around the time of World Cancer Day.
Opposition Amendment 229
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Accident and Emergency: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision relating to Accident and Emergency Department admission.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS Constitution for England for every patient to be admitted into an Accident and Emergency Department within 12 hours of approval of their admission being made.
(3) The Secretary of State must establish and implement an Accident and Emergency Scheme (“the Scheme”) to support NHS hospital trusts to achieve the requirement referred to in subsection (2).
(4) The Scheme must consider—
(a) creating safety-net social care beds,
(b) increasing step-down care,
(c) publishing a dedicated accident and emergency care workforce plan, and
(d) mandating that a qualified clinician must be present in every Accident and Emergency waiting room.
(5) The Secretary of State must have due regard to the final report of the Independent Commission on Adult Social Care in establishing the scheme.
(6) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This new clause gives patients a new right in the NHS constitution to be admitted into A&E within 12 hours from a decision to admit and requires the Secretary of State to introduce a scheme to achieve this.
Opposition Amendment 230
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Terminal illness: end of life care needs
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument impose a duty on integrated care boards to make provision for any person with a terminal illness diagnosis to be offered a conversation with a relevant healthcare professional about their needs for end-of-life care, including their—
(a) mental and physical health support needs, and
(b) financial support needs.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a person with a terminal illness diagnosis is unable to have the conversation, an integrated care board must ensure that the person’s next-of-kin are offered a conversation.
(3) Regulations under this section must make provision for any relevant authorities to have regard to the needs identified in a conversation under subsection (1).
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to make regulations which make provision for the any person with a terminal illness diagnosis to be offered a conversation with a relevant authority about their needs for end-of-life care.
None 231
Baroness Walmsley (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Medical disinformation strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the strategy”).
(2) The strategy must consider support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with patients who are vaccine-hesitant or have questions about vaccination.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to combat anti-vaccine and medical disinformation.
None 233
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Lab)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Prostate cancer early detection programme: implementation plan
The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a prostate cancer early detection programme implementation plan, including a funding assessment, service specification, workforce implications, and an equality impact assessment.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to lay before Parliament, within 12 months, an implementation plan for a prostate cancer early detection programme. It would not commit to a single screening method.
None 286
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 16 Oct 2026After Schedule 12, insert the following new Schedule—
“ScheduleSection
NATIONAL WHEELCHAIRS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1 The Committee must consist of a chairman appointed by the Secretary of State and not less than 10 nor more than 13 other members so appointed.
2 Each member of the Committee may be appointed to hold office for such a period of not more than 5 years, nor less than 3 years, as the Secretary of State may determine.
3 The Secretary of State may, at any time before the expiration of the term of office of any member, extend or further extend that member’s term of office, but no one extension may be for a period of more than 5 years from the date when the term of office would otherwise expire.
4 Any member—
(a) is eligible for reappointment from time to time on or after the expiration of their term of office;
(b) may by notice in writing to the Secretary of State resign office at any time, while remaining eligible for reappointment.
5 At least one third of the members of the Committee must be users of NHS wheelchair services.
6 The Secretary of State may remove a member of the Committee on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour.
7 The Secretary of State must appoint a secretary to the Committee and may appoint such other officers as necessary to the Committee, and there may be paid to them by the Secretary of State such salaries and allowances as the Secretary of State may with the consent of the Treasury determine.
8 The expenses of the Committee to such an amount as approved by the Treasury must be paid by the Secretary of State.
9 There may be paid as part of the expenses of the Committee—
(a) to all or any of the members of the Committee, such salaries or other remuneration and travelling and other allowances, and
(b) to persons attending its meetings at the request of the Committee, such travelling and other allowances (including compensation for loss of remunerative time),
as the Secretary of State may with the consent of the Treasury determine.
10 The Secretary of State may pay or make provision for paying, to or in respect of any member of the Committee, such sums by way of pensions, superannuation allowances and gratuities as the Secretary of State may determine with the consent of the Treasury.
11 Where a person ceases to be a member of the Committee otherwise than on the expiry of their term of office and it appears to the Secretary of State that there are special circumstances which allow for the person to receive compensation, the Secretary of State may make to the person a payment of such amount as the Secretary of State may determine with the consent of the Treasury.
12 The Committee may act notwithstanding any vacancy among the members.
13 The Committee may make rules for regulating its procedure (including the quorum of the Committee).”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to establish an advisory committee for NHS wheelchair commissioning and provision to be known as the National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee.
After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause— “Health inequalities: strategy and annual report (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a cross-government strategy for reducing health inequalities in England, setting out the steps to be taken by the Secretary of State and other Ministers of the Crown. (2) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each calendar year, a report on progress in reducing health inequalities in England and in implementing the strategy.”
After Clause 17, insert the following new Clause— “Prescribed specialised services (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument specify, based on clearly defined criteria, the services provided as part of the health service in England which are to be treated as specialised services (“prescribed specialised services”), and must publish the full list of such services. (2) Prescribed specialised services include both— (a) services for which commissioning responsibility is exercised by the Secretary of State, and (b) services for which commissioning responsibility is exercised by one or more integrated care boards. (3) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to ensure that all prescribed specialised services are informed by clinical involvement in the – (a) planning of the commissioning arrangements; (b) design of services and arrangements for service delivery; (c) monitoring of the performance of specialised services. (4) The Secretary of State is accountable for national oversight of all prescribed specialised services and must exercise functions in relation to those services with a view to securing equitable access for patients across England. (5) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the performance of all prescribed specialised services. (6) A report under subsection (5) must include information relating to – (a) patient outcomes, (b) access to services, (c) waiting times, (d) workforce capacity, (e) service sustainability, (f) geographical variation in services, (g) compliance with national service specifications, and (h) arrangements for the coordination of specialist, community and neighbourhood care. (7) A report under subsection (5) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament. (8) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— “Integrated care boards: prisons and probation After section 14744 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert— “14Z44A Duty as to prisons and probation etc (1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, comply with the conditions of this section. (2) The first condition is that they have due regard to the need to improve health outcomes for— (a) people in custody of the Prison Service, and (b) people under the supervision of the probation service in the community. (3) The second condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure continuity of care for people— (a) sentenced to a custodial sentence, (b) moved between prisons, (c) moved between areas pursuant to a community sentence imposed by a court, (d) released from secure custody and remaining under the supervision of the probation service, or (e) leaving the supervision of the probation service. (4) The third condition is that they take reasonable steps to ensure that people mentioned in subsection (2) have access, in addition to any services commissioned by local authorities, to— (a) mental health support, including but not limited to acute mental health services and psychiatric treatment, (b) substance misuse support, including but not limited to opiate and non-opiate and alcohol recovery services, (c) addiction services, including but not limited to smoking cessation, and gambling disorder services, and (d) other specialised services determined appropriate by assessment of local community needs or delivered by local providers. (5) When complying with the conditions set out in this section, an integrated care board must have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. (6) The Secretary of State may issue guidance on specific services which must be commissioned by integrated care boards in order to comply with this section. ””
After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause- "Primary care investment standard (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards. (2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year. (3) Regulations under this section may make provision about- (a) the description of services that constitute "primary care services" for the purposes of this section; (b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced; (c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- "Retention of NHS number on following adoption (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person's NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a person's health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made. (3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to – (a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and (b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent. (4) In this section- "adoption order" has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; "health record" has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018; "NHS number" has the same meaning as "consistent identifier" in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012."
Clause 57, page 42, line 9, after “the” insert “physical access to the individual,”
Clause 57, page 42, line 17, at end insert – "(fc) the importance of the individual having physical access to others including health and care partners;"."
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 16 Oct 2026After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "Healthwatch funding (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, bring forward a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and Local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14. (2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding in line with 2026/2027 inflation rates."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Fracture prevention services: implementation plan and reporting (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament an implementation plan for securing universal access in England by 2030 to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures. (2) The implementation plan must include- (a) a baseline assessment of current access to, and quality of, such services in each integrated care board area, (b) the minimum standards expected of such services, (c) measurable annual milestones towards universal access by 2030, including milestones relating to the identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, (d) the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to reduce unwarranted variation in access to, and quality of, such services, and (e) the outcomes by reference to which the effectiveness of implementation will be assessed, including the incidence of further fragility fractures and hip fractures. (3) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the publication of the implementation plan under subsection (1), and at intervals of no more than 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report setting out- (a) progress against the milestones in the implementation plan, (b) changes in access to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures, and (c) the number and proportion of eligible people identified, assessed, treated and followed up through such services, including variation between integrated care board areas. (4) In this section, "services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures" means services which provide for the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, including services commonly known as fracture liaison services."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Standards of care for NHS transplant patients' services (1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review on the standards of NHS care for transplant patients. (2) The review under subsection (1) may cover the following matters – (a) analysis of the comparative performance, outcomes, waiting times and organ utilisation, including variation between transplant centres and international comparisons in relation to lung transplants, hearts transplants, kidney transplants, liver transplants and other appropriate transplants; (b) analysis of workforce requirements and funding for 24/7 on call teams and centres providing transplant services; (c) such other matters as may be specified by the Secretary of State. (3) The review under subsection (1) must be taken in collaboration with patients, and families of patients together with practising clinicians in transplant services. (4) The review under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Health and care partners After section 242A National Health Service Act 2006 insert- "242B Involvement of health and care partners (1) A service user has a right to personal contact, without physical barriers or time limits, including contact in private, and to be accompanied in person by at least one health and care partner. (2) Each health and care provider must make arrangements, as respects health or care services for which it is responsible, which secure that users of those services may be accompanied by at least one health and care partner during any period during which health or care services are provided to the service user or the service user is under the care or supervision of the health and care provider. (3) For the purposes of this section a "health and care partner" is a named person chosen by the service user who provides care and support whether unpaid or paid to the service user. (4) The following are "health and care providers" for the purposes of this section- (a) an NHS Trust or NHS Foundation Trust, (b) an integrated care board, (c) an English local authority, (d) a care home in England within the meaning of section 8 (3) Care Act 2014, (e) a person or company providing health care or care services registered with the Care Quality Commission, or (f) a person or company who provides care services to another person in return for payment. ""
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Maternity safety (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated "good" or "outstanding" by the Care Quality Commission. (2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes – (a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward, (b) one-to-one midwifery care, (c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service, (d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and (e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan. (3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “National Wheelchairs Commissioner (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a National Wheelchairs Commissioner. (2) The functions of the National Wheelchairs Commissioner are to– (a) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality, procurement and provision of NHS wheelchair services; (b) provide leadership to NHS wheelchair services; (c) maintain a database of the NHS provision of wheelchairs; (d) monitor integrated care boards’ adoption of national standards established by the Secretary of State under section (National wheelchairs standards); (e) encourage the adoption of good practices in NHS wheelchair commissioning; (f) encourage the introduction of innovative wheelchair equipment in the NHS; (g) liaise with the National Wheelchairs Advisory committee as established under section (National Wheelchairs Advisory Committee); (h) perform such other duties as may be prescribed in regulations made by the Secretary of State by statutory instrument. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
Opposition Amendment 4
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause—
“Abolition of NHS England: transition plan
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a transition plan in relation to the abolition of NHS England.
(2) The transition plan must set out—
(a) the objectives which the abolition of NHS England is intended to achieve;
(b) the arrangements and timetable for transferring the functions, property, rights and liabilities of NHS England;
(c) the bodies to which those functions, property, rights and liabilities are expected to be transferred;
(d) the estimated gross costs associated with the abolition of NHS England and the implementation of the arrangements mentioned in paragraph (b);
(e) the estimated costs of redundancies, voluntary exits, pension liabilities and other staff-related payments arising from—
(i) the abolition of NHS England,
(ii) the restructuring of the Department of Health and Social Care,
(iii) changes affecting integrated care boards, and
(iv) changes affecting commissioning support units;
(f) the estimated costs associated with—
(i) the transfer, retention or disposal of property,
(ii) the transfer, variation or termination of contracts,
(iii) the transfer of information technology, data, records and other systems,
(iv) the establishment or modification of governance and accountability arrangements,
(v) the recruitment and training of staff,
(vi) the retention or replacement of specialist staff and expertise,
(vii) consultancy and other external professional services, and
(viii) any other activity required to implement the abolition;
(g) the estimated recurring annual savings expected to arise from the abolition of NHS England;
(h) the extent to which the savings mentioned in paragraph (g) are expected to constitute cash-releasing savings;
(i) the methodology, assumptions and baseline against which the costs and savings mentioned in this subsection are to be calculated;
(j) the financial year in which the total cumulative savings arising from the abolition of NHS England are expected to exceed the total cumulative costs of implementing that abolition;
(k) the existing departmental, health service or other budgets from which transition costs are to be met;
(l) the effect which meeting transition costs from the budgets identified under paragraph (k) is expected to have on—
(i) the provision of health services,
(ii) planned capital and technology expenditure,
(iii) integrated care boards,
(iv) workforce budgets, and
(v) other departmental programmes;
(m) the amount of any savings expected to be made available for the provision of front-line health services and the arrangements by which those savings are to be identified, transferred and monitored;
(n) the principal clinical, financial and operational risks associated with the transition;
(o) the measures to be taken to secure the continuity of services during the transition;
(p) the measures to be taken to identify, retain and transfer staff with specialist knowledge or expertise;
(q) the arrangements for the transfer and continued operation of nationally significant services, contracts, information systems and corporate holdings;
(r) the measures by which the Secretary of State will assess whether the objectives mentioned in paragraph (a) have been achieved.
(3) The estimates contained in the transition plan must distinguish between—
(a) one-off transition costs,
(b) recurring expenditure,
(c) gross savings,
(d) net savings,
(e) cash-releasing savings, and
(f) non-cashable efficiencies or avoided future costs.
(4) The Secretary of State must arrange for the transition plan, including its financial estimates, methodology and assumptions, to be reviewed by an independent person with experience of public-sector finance, organisational restructuring or health service administration.
(5) A person carrying out a review under subsection (4) must assess—
(a) whether the estimates in the transition plan are reasonable,
(b) whether the plan identifies the full costs of implementation,
(c) whether the methodology and assumptions used to calculate costs and savings are reasonable and have been applied consistently,
(d) whether the distinction between gross, net and cash-releasing savings is clear and supportable,
(e) whether the expected break-even date is supported by the available evidence, and
(f) whether the arrangements for managing risks and maintaining operational continuity are adequate.
(6) The person carrying out the review must prepare a report setting out the conclusions of the review.
(7) The Secretary of State must publish, alongside the transition plan—
(a) the report prepared under subsection (6),
(b) the name of the person who carried out the review,
(c) a statement of that person’s relevant experience and qualifications,
(d) a description of the process by which that person was appointed, and
(e) a declaration of any interests which might reasonably be thought to affect that person’s independence.
(8) The Secretary of State must lay the transition plan and the report prepared under subsection (6) before Parliament.
(9) The Secretary of State must comply with subsections (1) to (8) before making regulations bringing section 1 or 2 into force.
(10) In this section—
“cash-releasing savings” means a reduction in expenditure which releases resources that may be reallocated without reducing the level or quality of services provided;
“front-line health services” means services provided directly for the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness, or for the care of patients;
“NHS England” means the National Health Service Commissioning Board.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an independently reviewed transition plan before commencing the abolition of NHS England. The plan would have to identify the full costs of transition, projected recurring and cash-releasing savings, the expected break-even date, the budgets from which transition expenditure will be met, the amount expected to be released to front-line services, and the arrangements for managing staffing and operational-continuity risks.
Opposition Amendment 5
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause—
“Supply Chain Coordination Limited
(1) Before making a transfer scheme under section 2 which relates to shares held by NHS England in Supply Chain Coordination Limited, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the proposed future ownership and governance of that company.
(2) The report must set out—
(a) the person to whom the shares are to be transferred;
(b) the reasons for selecting that person;
(c) the date on which the transfer is intended to take effect;
(d) the person who will exercise the shareholder function during the transfer period;
(e) the person who will exercise the shareholder function following completion of the transfer;
(f) the arrangements by which the exercise of the shareholder function will be overseen and held to account;
(g) any proposed change to the company’s articles of association, governance arrangements, objectives or operating model;
(h) the arrangements for ensuring continuity in the procurement, storage, distribution and supply of medicines, medical devices, equipment and other goods required by the health service;
(i) an assessment of the principal risks to procurement and supply resilience arising from the transfer;
(j) arrangements for managing shortages, disruption or failure of supply;
(k) the arrangements for retaining staff with expertise necessary for the continued operation of the company;
(l) the contingency arrangements which will apply if the transfer cannot be completed or gives rise to a material risk of disruption;
(n) a summary of any independent assurance obtained concerning the proposed transfer and the continuity and resilience of the services provided by the company.
(3) The Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate before preparing the report.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament on the proposed ownership and governance of Supply Chain Coordination Limited before transferring the shares held in that company by NHS England. The report would have to identify who will exercise the shareholder function during and after the transition and explain how continuity and resilience in the procurement and supply of essential products will be protected.
None 8
Baroness Walmsley (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 24, leave out “have regard to the need to” and insert “take steps to achieve”
This amendment would strengthen the Secretary of State’s duty as to reducing health inequalities from a duty to have regard to the need to reduce them to a duty to take steps to achieve their reduction.
None 9
Baroness Walmsley (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 25, leave out “reduce inequalities” and insert “a reduction in inequalities”
This amendment is consequential on Baroness Walmsley’s amendment to Clause 4, page 3, line 24.
None 10
Baroness Walmsley (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 27, leave out “reduce inequalities” and insert “a reduction in inequalities”
This amendment is consequential on Baroness Walmsley’s amendment to Clause 4, page 3, line 24.
None 11
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to their ability to access services and make provision for a system of equitable distribution of general medical practitioners in England.”
The amendment seeks to ensure that in relation to the Secretary of State’s responsibility to reduce inequalities this must embrace access to services including ensuring of equitable distribution of general medical practitioners.
None 12
Lord Rennard (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, including variation in access to structured education, glucose monitoring technology and insulin pump therapy.”
This amendment would make diabetes-related health inequalities an explicit, named consideration within the Secretary of State’s general duty to reduce inequalities, rather than leaving diabetes provision to be addressed only implicitly.
Opposition Amendment 22
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 5, page 4, leave out lines 2 to 4 and insert—
“(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must act with a view to enabling patients to make choices with respect to aspects of health services provided to them, including to make choices as to the provider of those services.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Secretary of State must ensure that patients who are referred for a service to be provided outside a hospital setting (“out-of-hospital services”) are offered a choice of provider of that service from among the providers available in their integrated care board area and, where relevant, in neighbouring areas, in accordance with regulations made under section 14Z45B.
(3) Regulations under section 14Z45B must provide that, where an out-of-hospital service is to be provided to a patient, the integrated care board must—
(a) offer the patient a meaningful choice of at least two providers capable of providing the service, which may include NHS bodies and independent sector providers approved to provide that service under arrangements with the integrated care board,
(b) provide the patient with information to support an informed choice, including for each available provider—
(i) indicative waiting times,
(ii) the location at which the service would be provided,
(iii) the quality ratings or outcomes data applicable to that provider for that service where such data is available, and
(iv) whether any costs would be incurred by the patient in travelling to or receiving the service at that provider,
(c) not exclude from the list of available providers any provider approved solely on grounds of commercial interest or organisational type, and
(d) take all reasonable steps to give effect to the patient's choice within a clinically appropriate timeframe.
(4) For the purposes of this section, “out-of-hospital services” means services—
(a) provided in community, primary care or ambulatory settings rather than in a hospital inpatient or outpatient department, and
(b) which the Secretary of State specifies by regulations as being within the scope of the choice obligation under subsection (2), and may include diagnostic services, audiology and hearing aid care, podiatry, dietetics and nutrition, physiotherapy, ambulatory cardiac monitoring and such other services as the Secretary of State may specify.
(5) In specifying services under subsection (4)(b), the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the potential for the expansion of choice to reduce waiting times for the relevant service,
(b) the availability of sufficient independent and NHS providers to make genuine choice meaningful, and
(c) the desirability of ensuring access to choice for patients in all parts of England, including in rural and deprived areas.
(6) The Secretary of State must publish, and lay before Parliament, within 12 months of the date on which this Act is passed, a statement setting out—
(a) the out-of-hospital services for which choice obligations under subsection (2) will initially apply,
(b) the timetable for extending the choice obligation to further services, and
(c) the support that will be made available to patients, in particular those with limited digital access or literacy, to exercise the choices to which they are entitled under this section.
(7) The Secretary of State must review and update the statement required by subsection (6) at intervals of not more than two years.”
This amendment strengthens the new patient choice duty inserted by Clause 5 to provide a specific right to choose between providers for out-of-hospital services.
None 25
Lord Rennard (LD)Clause 6, page 4, line 11, at end insert—
“(1A) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, promoting innovation in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, including through the adoption of glucose monitoring and automated insulin delivery technologies.”
This amendment would ensure that the existing duty to promote innovation is understood to cover the specific diabetes technologies (flash/CGM and hybrid closed loop systems) currently being rolled out by NHS England, so that momentum on adoption is not lost through the transfer of functions.
Opposition Amendment 32
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 8, page 5, leave out lines 19 to 24 and insert—
“(5) Where the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish a statement before the end of the period of seven working days beginning with the day on which the direction is given.
(6) A statement published under subsection (5) must set out—
(a) the statutory function in respect of which the direction is given,
(b) the reasons for giving the direction,
(c) the period for which the direction is to have effect,
(d) the date by which the operation of the direction is to be reviewed,
(e) any payment which the Secretary of State has made, or intends to make, to an integrated care board under subsection (4) in connection with the direction,
(f) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the financial and operational effects of the direction on each integrated care board to which it applies,
(g) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the effect of the direction on the ability of each integrated care board to meet the needs and priorities of its local population, and
(h) the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and each integrated care board to which the direction applies for the exercise of the function and for any outcomes arising from its exercise.
(7) If the Secretary of State varies or revokes a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must publish—
(a) the variation or revocation before the end of the period of seven days beginning with the day on which a direction is made, and
(b) a statement setting out the reasons for the variation or revocation and its expected financial and operational effects.”
This amendment would require a direction to an integrated care board to exercise a function of the Secretary of State to be set out in a statement published within seven working days. It would also require publication of the reasons for the direction, its duration and review date, its financial and operational effects, its effect on local priorities, and the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and the integrated care board.
Opposition Amendment 37
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 11, page 7, line 6, at end insert—
“(3A) The Secretary of State may give a direction under this section only if satisfied that—
(a) the objective of the direction cannot reasonably be achieved by—
(i) the giving of guidance,
(ii) agreement with the integrated care board,
(iii) the exercise of existing oversight or performance management arrangements, or
(iv) any other means which would involve less restriction of the integrated care board’s discretion,
(b) the direction is necessary and proportionate to the objective which it seeks to achieve,
(c) the benefits expected to arise from the direction, including any benefits arising from consistency between different areas, outweigh any restriction which the direction would place on the ability of the integrated care board to respond to the needs and priorities of its local population, and
(d) the integrated care board has been consulted in accordance with subsection (3C).
(3B) In deciding whether to give a direction under this section, and in determining the terms of any such direction, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the desirability of decisions relating to the provision of health services being taken at the most local level reasonably appropriate,
(b) the desirability of integrated care boards having sufficient autonomy to respond to the needs and priorities of their local populations,
(c) the importance of maintaining clear and identifiable responsibility for decisions and outcomes,
(d) the likely financial and operational effects of the direction on the integrated care board, and
(e) the availability to the integrated care board of the resources necessary to comply with the direction.
(3C) Before giving a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must—
(a) provide the integrated care board with a proposed draft of the direction,
(b) provide the integrated care board with a statement of—
(i) the objective of the proposed direction,
(ii) the reasons why the Secretary of State considers the conditions in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) to be satisfied,
(iii) the expected financial and operational effects of the proposed direction, and
(iv) any additional financial or other resources which the Secretary of State proposes to make available to enable the integrated care board to comply with the direction,
(c) allow the integrated care board a reasonable period in which to make representations, and
(d) have regard to any representations made by the integrated care board.
(3D) The Secretary of State may give a direction without complying with subsection (3A)(d) or (3C) only if satisfied that—
(a) there is an urgent need to protect the health or safety of the public or the continuity of essential health services, and
(b) the delay involved in complying with those subsections would create a serious risk of harm.
(3E) Where the Secretary of State gives a direction in reliance on subsection (3D), the Secretary of State must—
(a) consult the integrated care board as soon as reasonably practicable after giving the direction,
(b) provide the integrated care board with the information specified in subsection (3C)(b),
(c) have regard to any representations subsequently made by the integrated care board, and
(d) before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day on which the direction was given, decide whether to confirm, vary or revoke the direction.
(3F) A direction given in reliance on subsection (3D) ceases to have effect at the end of the period specified in subsection (3E)(d) unless, before the end of that period, the Secretary of State—
(a) confirms or varies the direction,
(b) publishes the reasons for that decision, and
(c) publishes an assessment of whether the conditions in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) continue to be satisfied.
(3G) A direction under this section must be no broader, and remain in effect for no longer, than is necessary to achieve its stated objective.”
This amendment would provide that the Secretary of State may direct an integrated care board only where the objective cannot reasonably be achieved through guidance, agreement, existing oversight arrangements or another less restrictive means, and where the direction is necessary and proportionate. It would require the Secretary of State to have regard to local decision-making and ICB autonomy, and normally to consult the ICB before issuing a direction. An exception would apply where consultation would create a serious risk to public health, safety or the continuity of essential health services.
Opposition Amendment 38
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Clause 11, page 7, leave out lines 10 to 17 and insert—
“(5) Where the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish a statement before the end of the period of seven working days beginning with the day on which the direction is given.
(6) A statement published under subsection (5) must set out—
(a) the statutory function to which the direction relates,
(b) the legal basis for the direction,
(c) the reasons for giving the direction,
(d) the period for which the direction is to have effect,
(e) the date by which the operation of the direction is to be reviewed,
(f) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the financial and operational effects of the direction on each integrated care board to which it applies,
(g) whether any additional funding or other resources are to be made available to an integrated care board for the purpose of complying with the direction and, if so, the amount or description of those resources,
(h) the Secretary of State’s assessment of whether, and to what extent, the direction restricts the ability of an integrated care board to determine or meet the needs and priorities of its local population,
(i) the outcomes which the direction is intended to achieve, and
(j) the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and each integrated care board to which the direction applies for decisions taken and outcomes arising while the direction is in effect.
(7) Where a direction is given in reliance on subsection (3), the statement under subsection (6) must also—
(a) identify the opinion formed by the Secretary of State,
(b) set out the reasons for that opinion, and
(c) explain why the Secretary of State considers it appropriate for the integrated care board not to form its own opinion in relation to the exercise of the function.
(8) If the Secretary of State varies or revokes a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must—
(a) publish the variation or revocation before the end of the period of seven days beginning with the day on which it is made, and
(b) publish a statement setting out the reasons for the variation or revocation and its expected financial and operational effects.”
This amendment would require a statement to be published within seven working days of a general direction to an integrated care board being issued. It would require the Secretary of State to publish, in the statement, the reasons for the direction, its duration, review date, financial and operational effects, the resources available for compliance, its effect on local priorities, its intended outcomes, and the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and the integrated care board. It would impose additional transparency requirements where the Secretary of State substitutes their own opinion for that of the board.
Opposition Amendment 41
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)LORD PATEL
Tabled: 15 Oct 2026After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Cancer outcomes
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1GA insert—
“1GB Cancer outcomes
In exercising functions relating to the health service, the Secretary of State must treat objectives relating to cancer outcomes as having priority over any other objectives relating specifically to cancer.””
The Secretary of State is currently required to set cancer outcome objectives for NHS England, with those objectives taking priority over other cancer goals. The Health Bill removes this provision. This new clause would place a new duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise cancer outcomes such as survival.
None 42
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause—
“Ministerial responsibility for social care
In section 1(3) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (ministerial responsibility to Parliament), after “service” insert “, and the promotion of social care,”.”
This amendment would extend the Secretary of State’s ministerial responsibility to Parliament under section 1(3) of the National Health Service Act 2006 to the promotion of social care, alongside the provision of the health service.
None 58
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)Clause 12, page 10, line 10, at end insert—
“(5) Before making regulations under subsection (1)(b) which would have the effect of transferring responsibility for the commissioning of services for the diagnosis, treatment or management of allergic disease from the Secretary of State to integrated care boards, the Secretary of State must—
(a) assess the adequacy and geographical distribution of specialist allergy services in England;
(b) assess the capacity of integrated care boards to commission appropriate allergy services;
(c) consult persons with relevant clinical expertise, integrated care boards, patients and organisations representing people affected by allergic disease.
(6) The assessment under subsection (5) must have particular regard to—
(a) access to specialist allergy expertise,
(b) the integration of allergy services across primary, community and secondary care, and
(c) unwarranted geographical variation in access to allergy diagnosis and treatment.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to assess the adequacy of allergy provision and consult relevant bodies before transferring responsibility for commissioning allergy services to integrated care boards, with regard to specialist provision and geographical variation in access to care.
None 63
Baroness Janke (LD)Schedule 1, page 77, line 34, at end insert—
“45A After section 133 insert—
“133A Emergency intervention in pharmaceutical services
(1) Where an integrated care board considers that a person providing pharmaceutical services is failing, or is likely to fail, materially to comply with—
(a) a contractual obligation,
(b) a patient-safety requirement, or
(c) a workforce obligation,
the board must consider whether emergency intervention is required to protect patients or continuity of pharmaceutical services.
(2) Where the board considers that emergency intervention is required, it may—
(a) require the provider to take specified remedial action,
(b) suspend specified arrangements,
(c) terminate arrangements with the provider,
(d) make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services, or
(e) take any combination of the steps in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(3) The powers in subsection (2) must be exercised with regard to the need to maintain continuity of medicines supply and protect patients from avoidable disruption.
(4) An integrated care board must not continue arrangements with a provider where it is satisfied that the provider is demonstrably unfit to provide pharmaceutical services safely and effectively.
(5) Before exercising a power under subsection (2), the board must, except in an emergency, give the provider a reasonable opportunity to make representations.
(6) Nothing in this section prevents an integrated care board from taking immediate action where delay would materially risk patient safety or continuity of medicines supply.””
This amendment would give integrated care boards powers to intervene where a pharmacy provider is failing to provide their required services to protect patients and medicines supply.
None 64
Baroness Janke (LD)Schedule 1, page 82, line 40, at end insert—
“(3D) Regulations made under subsection (1) must ensure that the remuneration arrangements for pharmaceutical services take account of the costs of providing those services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
(3E) In making provision under subsection (3D), the determining authority must have regard to—
(a) rurality,
(b) the age profile of the population,
(c) transport and distribution costs,
(d) seasonal changes in demand,
(e) difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff, and
(f) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated areas.
(3F) The remuneration arrangements must be designed to support the financial sustainability of pharmacies providing essential NHS services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
(3G) The Secretary of State must review the operation of the remuneration arrangements periodically and make such changes as are necessary to ensure that the matters in subsections (3D) to (3F) continue to be reflected.”
This amendment would require pharmacy funding to reflect the additional costs of providing services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
None 65
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (LD)Clause 15, page 11, line 25, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to ensure that arrangements under subsection (2) are accessible and inclusive, having particular regard to the needs of—
(a) persons with disabilities, and
(b) persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to take reasonable steps to ensure that arrangements for involving patients in commissioning are accessible to disabled people and people with long-term, complex or fluctuating conditions, including those who are housebound or bedbound.
None 85
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Lab)LORD PATEL
Lord Bishop of Gloucester (Bshp)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Women’s centres
After section 14Z35 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“14Z35B Duty to cooperate: integrated care boards and women’s centres
(1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, cooperate with women’s centres for the purpose of—
(a) tackling health inequalities affecting women, and
(b) improving the prevention, diagnosis and treatment including awareness of and access to treatment of women’s health needs and wellbeing.
(2) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, a requirement for the integrated care board to—
(a) secure the involvement of women’s centres in the planning of commissioning arrangements and decisions about the provision of services relevant to women’s health, including services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage,
(b) arrangements under subsection (2)(a) may include, in particular—
(i) delivery of NHS services from, or in connection with, women’s centres,
(ii) the commissioning of services from women’s centres,
(iii) the establishment of enhancing of referral pathways between NHS services and women’s centres, and
(iv) other forms of cooperation with the integrated care board considers likely to improve women’s access to health care or reduce health inequalities,
(c) have regard, when exercising its functions under sections 14Z35 (duties as to reducing inequalities) and 14Z45 (public involvement and consultation), to the views of women’s centres,
(d) work with women’s centres to identify, monitor and review health inequalities and barriers to accessing health care provision affecting women in the integrated care board’s boundary, and
(e) have regard, in exercising its functions under this section, to any strategy or policy statement relating to women’s health published or approved by the Secretary of State.
(3) In complying with subsection (2), an integrated care board must secure that women’s centres are, so far as reasonably practicable—
(a) involved in the preparation and review of any strategy or plan prepared by the integrated care board that relates to women’s health, and
(b) consulted on proposals by the integrated care board that may have a significant impact on the provision of services to women in its boundary.
(4) In this section—
“women’s centre” means a locally based community organisation within the board’s boundaries that specialises in supporting women, that—
(a) is a social purpose body,
(b) provides multi-faceted and therapeutic support to women experiencing multiple disadvantage, and
(c) provides women-only services or facilities appropriate to the needs and safety of the women using those services;
“multiple disadvantage” means a person’s experiences of two or more of the following—
(a) poverty or financial exclusion,
(b) homelessness,
(c) victimisation including domestic abuse, sexual violence and exploitation,
(d) contact with the criminal justice system,
(e) mental ill health, physical ill health and substance dependence, and
(f) other circumstances as may be prescribed;
“social purpose body” means any body corporate or unincorporated association whose primary purpose is to advance charitable, community, social, environmental, cultural or other public benefit objectives, and whose governing arrangements ensure that any profits or surpluses are applied wholly or principally in furtherance of those objectives rather than for private distribution;
“therapeutic support services” means services whose principal purpose is to improve or maintain the mental, emotional, physical or social wellbeing of individuals through therapeutic, rehabilitative, preventative or recovery-focused interventions, and includes services provided in community, residential, educational or healthcare settings.””
This new clause would require ICBs to work collaboratively with women’s centres in assessing needs, planning and commissioning services, and tackling health inequalities affecting women, and to have regard to any strategy or policy statement relating to women’s health published or approved by the Secretary of State.
Opposition Amendment 86
Lord Kamall (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Integrated care board annual reports: ministerial directions
(1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 14Z58 (annual report), after subsection 2(d) insert—
“(e) contain, in relation to each relevant direction which had effect in relation to the integrated care board during the financial year—
(i) a copy of, or a reference to the place of publication of, the direction,
(ii) the period during which the direction had effect,
(iii) a description of the decisions taken by the integrated care board which were materially affected by the direction,
(iv) the expenditure incurred by the integrated care board in complying with the direction,
(v) the amount of any additional funding or other resources provided by the Secretary of State in connection with the direction,
(vi) a description of any clinical, financial or operational risks which the integrated care board advised the Secretary of State would arise, or were likely to arise, from the direction,
(vii) a description of any steps taken by the integrated care board or the Secretary of State to mitigate those risks,
(viii) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on its ability to discharge its functions,
(ix) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on its ability to meet the needs and priorities of its local population,
(x) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on the delivery of its plans and priorities for the financial year, and
(xi) a description of any outcome for which the integrated care board considers that responsibility was materially shared with, or rested wholly or principally with, the Secretary of State by reason of the direction.
(3) Where information required by (2)(e) has been included in another document published by the integrated care board, the annual report may comply with that subsection by—
(a) identifying the document,
(b) stating where the document may be accessed free of charge, and
(c) providing a summary of the information.
(4) In this section, “relevant direction” means a direction given by the Secretary of State under—
(a) section 7B,
(b) section 14Z61,
(c) section 14Z62A, or
(d) section 223GA.”
(3) In section 14Z59 (duty to keep experience of members under review), or in such other provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, references to the integrated care board’s annual report are to be read subject to the requirements inserted by subsection (2).”
This new clause would require an integrated care board’s annual report to identify ministerial directions which applied to it during the year and to explain their effect on the board’s decisions, expenditure, risks, local priorities and outcomes. It would also enable the board to identify outcomes for which responsibility was materially shared with, or rested wholly or principally with, the Secretary of State.
None 88
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to identify and record unpaid carers
After section 14Z44 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“14Z44A Duty to identify and record unpaid carers
(1) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to identify persons within its area who are unpaid carers.
(2) An integrated care board must make arrangements to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area—
(a) maintain appropriate systems for recording whether a person is an unpaid carer,
(b) use consistent coding standards for the recording of unpaid carers in health records,
(c) review and update records relating to unpaid carers at appropriate intervals, and
(d) ensure that the identification and recording of unpaid carers forms part of—
(i) primary care registration processes,
(ii) hospital discharge procedures,
(iii) care planning processes, and
(iv) other relevant patient contact pathways.
(3) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
This amendment would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to identify and record unpaid carers when they come into contact with NHS services.
None 89
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“14Z44A Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers
(1) Each integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to improving and maintaining the physical health, mental health, and wellbeing of carers within its area.
(2) In exercising its duties under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) reduction of health inequalities experienced by carers,
(b) prevention of deterioration in carers’ physical and mental health,
(c) involvement of carers in decisions relating to the care of persons for whom they provide care, and
(d) the need to ensure carers are able to access appropriate preventative and other health services and support.
(3) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area—
(a) consider the health and wellbeing needs of carers in care planning and discharge processes,
(b) involve carers appropriately in decisions relating to care and treatment, and
(c) provide carers with information about support available to them for their health and wellbeing.
(4) In preparing a Joint Forward Plan, an integrated care board must include—
(a) an assessment of the health and wellbeing needs of carers within its area,
(b) steps the integrated care board proposes to take to improve outcomes for carers, and
(c) measures for reducing inequalities experienced by carers.
(5) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
This amendment would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to promote the health and wellbeing of carers.
None 95
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert—
“(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must set out, by reference to the assessed needs and the respective functions of the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards—
(a) the changes proposed in the pattern of health services, care and support to strengthen prevention, early intervention and support in people’s homes and communities,
(b) how the bodies propose to exercise their commissioning and other relevant functions to achieve those changes,
(c) the workforce, provider and community capacity required to deliver the proposed changes and the arrangements for developing that capacity,
(d) the resources required, including any proposed reallocation of resources and investment required during transition,
(e) any material difference in financial incentives, costs or benefits between the bodies which could impede the proposed changes, and the arrangements proposed to address it, and
(f) how progress in implementing the changes and their effects on outcomes for people will be assessed.
(2C) In preparing the matters required by subsection (2B), the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards must have regard to the need to maintain continuity and safe access to necessary services during transition.”
This amendment would require neighbourhood health plans to explain how the statutory partners intend to develop preventive and community-based models of care and support, and how commissioning, resources, capacity and financial arrangements will support the proposed changes. It would also require attention to transitional investment, service continuity and assessment of progress.
None 96
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert—
“(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must describe the arrangements which the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards propose to make, in the exercise of their respective functions and with relevant providers of health and care services, for—
(a) taking reasonable steps to identify unpaid carers and, where appropriate, record their caring responsibilities,
(b) providing unpaid carers with accessible information and advice about support available to them,
(c) enabling an unpaid carer who may have needs for support to be referred or otherwise connected, as appropriate, to the responsible local authority for consideration of an assessment under section 10 of the Care Act 2014 or sections 17ZA or 17ZD of the Children Act 1989,
(d) recognising unpaid carers’ own physical and mental health and wellbeing needs, including in care planning and hospital discharge arrangements, and
(e) ensuring that identification and planning do not proceed on an assumption that an unpaid carer is willing or able to provide or continue providing care.
(2C) In subsection (2B), “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care, including practical or emotional support, for another person otherwise than under or by virtue of a contract or as voluntary work, and includes a young carer within the meaning of section 17ZA of the Children Act 1989 and a parent carer within the meaning of section 17ZD of that Act.”
This amendment would require neighbourhood health plans to describe arrangements for identifying unpaid carers, providing information and advice, connecting carers with relevant assessment and support pathways, and recognising carers’ own health and wellbeing needs. It includes young carers and parent carers while preserving existing statutory assessment responsibilities.
None 97
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (LD)Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert—
“(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must set out how the needs of persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions are to be met by the exercise of functions of the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards.”
This amendment would require neighbourhood health plans to set out how the needs of people with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions are to be met.
Opposition Amendment 106
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 39, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty of NHS boards to report medical malpractice
(1) A member of the board of directors of an NHS trust or an NHS foundation trust in England must report any evidence or reports they have seen of systemic medical malpractice within the trust to—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the Department of Health and Social Care, and
(c) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body.
(2) The board of directors of an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust in England has a collective duty to—
(a) refer the trust to the Care Quality Commission, and
(b) alert the Department of Health and Social Care and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body if staff employed by, or acting on behalf of, the trust raise concerns of systemic medical malpractice.
(3) In this section, “systemic medical malpractice” means an action or omission in the provision of health care that falls below the expected standard of care and indicates a widespread, patterned, or recurring failure within the systems, processes, or governance of the trust.”
This new clause seeks to introduce a mandatory individual duty for members of NHS and Foundation Trust boards to escalate evidence of systemic medical malpractice to the CQC, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the HSSIB. It also seeks to impose a collective duty on the board to formally refer the trust to regulators if staff raise concerns regarding malpractice.
None 108
Baroness Janke (LD)Clause 43, page 31, line 12, at end insert—
“(7) Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that a pharmacy provider has materially failed to comply with contractual, patient-safety or workforce obligations, the Secretary of State may by direction require the relevant integrated care board—
(a) to suspend or terminate arrangements with that provider, where appropriate,
(b) to make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services,
(c) to secure continuity of the supply of medicines and other pharmaceutical services, and
(d) to take such other emergency measures as may be specified in the direction.
(8) A direction under subsection (7) may be given where the Secretary of State considers that there is a significant risk to patient safety, continuity of medicines supply or the provision of pharmaceutical services.
(9) The Secretary of State must ensure that arrangements made under subsection (7) are implemented as soon as reasonably practicable.
(10) A direction under subsection (7) must specify the period for which it has effect and must be published.”
This amendment would enable intervention where a pharmacy provider seriously fails to meet contractual, safety or workforce obligations, ensuring continuity of services and medicines supply.
None 109
Baroness Janke (LD)Clause 43, page 31, line 12, at end insert—
“(7) Where a situation or event has resulted, or is likely to result, in the closure, failure or disruption of a provider of pharmaceutical services, the Secretary of State and the relevant integrated care board must provide such assistance and support as is reasonably necessary to enable a new provider to establish or continue the provision of pharmaceutical services.
(8) Assistance or support under subsection (7) may include facilitating and establishing a relationship between a new provider and the manufacturers or suppliers of medicines and other pharmaceutical products.
(9) The assistance and support under subsection (7) must be available, in particular, where a new provider is—
(a) taking over premises previously operated by a provider of pharmaceutical services that has failed or closed,
(b) taking over premises where there has been evidence of serious misconduct, including malpractice or failure to pay staff, or
(c) an independent provider or a provider which is not part of a large company operating multiple pharmacy premises.
(10) The purpose of assistance and support under this section is to enable the new provider to secure supplies of medicines and other pharmaceutical products as quickly as reasonably practicable and to minimise any interruption in the provision of pharmaceutical services.”
This amendment would require the Government and integrated care boards to support new and independent pharmacy owners taking over failing, closed or disrupted pharmacies, including by helping them establish relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers so that they can secure medicines and other supplies quickly and maintain continuity of service.
None 110
Baroness Janke (LD)After Clause 43, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection of pharmacy staff during provider failure
(1) The Secretary of State must establish arrangements to protect the pay and essential employment protections of staff employed by a provider of pharmaceutical services where the provider—
(a) becomes insolvent,
(b) ceases to provide pharmaceutical services,
(c) has its arrangements for providing pharmaceutical services suspended or terminated, or
(d) is otherwise unable to meet its obligations to its employees.
(2) Arrangements under subsection (1) must provide for—
(a) the continuation, so far as reasonably practicable, of payment of wages to affected staff,
(b) the preservation of essential employment protections during the period of emergency intervention,
(c) the maintenance of staffing necessary for the safe provision of pharmaceutical services, and
(d) the transfer, continuation or replacement of employment arrangements where necessary to secure continuity of pharmaceutical services.
(3) The Secretary of State may make payments to, or in respect of, affected staff for the purposes of this section.
(4) The Secretary of State may recover from the failed provider any sums paid under subsection (3).
(5) Arrangements under this section must be capable of operating at the same time as arrangements made under section 133 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (inadequate provision of pharmaceutical services ) to secure alternative provision of pharmaceutical services.
(6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the operation of arrangements under this section.”
This amendment would protect pharmacy staff’s pay and essential employment rights when a provider fails, while supporting continuity of services.
None 113
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would place the original mental health investment standard on a statutory footing, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
None 115
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 48, page 33, line 14, after “(1)” insert “or (2A)”.
This amendment is consequential to another in the name of Baroness Tyler of Enfield and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on mental health services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
None 116
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (LD)Clause 48, page 33, line 37, at end insert—
“(f) require the integrated care board to use a portion of designated amount for the provision of social care services and support for the physical and mentalhealth and wellbeing of unpaid carers.”
This amendment would allow the Secretary of State to require that certain funds allocated to an integrated care board be used for the provision of social care services and support for the physical and mental health and wellbeing of unpaid carers.
Opposition Amendment 217
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Cancer survival research programme
(1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a Cancer Survival Research Programme.
(2) Regulations under this section must—
(a) require government co-ordination and funding for research into cancers with a five-year survival rate below 20%, and
(b) establish a fellowship programme for foreign academics in cancer research.
(3) Any programme established under paragraph (2)(b) must make provision to waive visa fees for entry into the UK for participating academics.
(4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to introduce regulations requiring the government to coordinate research into cancers with the lowest survival rate.
Opposition Amendment 219
Baroness Pidgeon (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Health)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Corridor care
(1) The Secretary of State must end the practice of corridor care in NHS hospitals within one year of the day on which this Act is passed.
(2) If the requirement under subsection (1) is not met, the Secretary of State must commission an independent inquiry into the Government's handling of corridor care.
(3) The inquiry under subsection (2) must—
(a) investigate the effectiveness of policies, funding and guidance relating to corridor care in the Department of Health and Social Care,
(b) assess the impact on patient safety and staff morale of the continued practice of corridor care, and
(c) recommend steps the Secretary of State should take to end the practice of corridor care.
(4) The inquiry under subsection (1) should be supported by patient safety professionals from the Health Services Safety Investigations Body and the Care Quality Commission.
(5) The inquiry must publish and lay before Parliament a final report within 6 months of the day on which the inquiry is established.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to end corridor care within 12 months; if they fail to do so they must order an independent inquiry into corridor care and the failure to eradicate the practice.
Opposition Amendment 220
Lord Clement-Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (AI and Digital)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme
(1) Section 4 of the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (2) for “(4)” substitute “(4A)”
(3) After subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen,
(b) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or
(c) have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and
hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens, people with indefinite leave to remain, or settled status who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
None 221
Lord Scriven (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Health strategy for people with learning disabilities
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health strategy for people with learning disabilities in England.
(2) The Secretary of State must appoint a co-national director with a learning disability to lead on its development.
(3) The strategy must be set out in, and aligned to, a new modern service framework, comprising—
(a) an evidence-based description of the standards of care that should be available across the health service in England for people with learning disabilities of all ages,
(b) the interventions and service models that must be implemented to improve outcomes for people with learning disabilities, including in particular (but not limited to)—
(i) the steps to be taken to reduce early and avoidable mortality and close the gap in life expectancy for people with learning disabilities,
(ii) the steps to be taken to reduce variation in the quality of and access to healthcare experienced by people with learning disabilities across integrated care board areas,
(iii) the steps to be taken to improve the outcomes and experiences of people with learning disabilities, including their experiences of joined-up health and social care, being able to live healthier lives, and the support available to unpaid carers of people with learning disabilities, and
(iv) the workforce requirements for delivering high-quality care, and the actions to be taken on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to learning disability healthcare,
(c) measurable outcomes and milestones against which progress will be assessed, including the collection and publication of an annual dataset at national and local level covering the matters in paragraph (b), and
(d) clear accountability for delivery at national and local level, including the appointment of one or more members of each integrated care board with responsibility for people with learning disabilities, and the publication of their details.
(4) The strategy must be accompanied by a plan for research to develop the evidence base for improving the health and life expectancy of people with learning disabilities.
(5) In preparing the strategy the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) people with learning disabilities, their carers and supporters, and organisations representing the interests of people with learning disabilities,
(b) clinicians from across the healthcare system and across all professional groups with expertise in supporting people with learning disabilities,
(c) integrated care boards,
(d) NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, and
(e) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(6) The Secretary of State must lay the strategy before Parliament on the day on which it is published.
(7) The Secretary of State must publish a report on national and local progress against the strategy at intervals of not more than 12 months following its initial publication.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to publish a health strategy for people with learning disabilities, focused on reducing the health inequalities and life expectancy gap they experience.
None 222
Lord Scriven (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Non-therapeutic male circumcision
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, make regulations made by statutory instrument relating to non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC).
(2) Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) a requirement that NTMC may only be performed by a suitably qualified healthcare professional regulated by the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the inclusion of NTMC as a regulated activity under the Health and Social Care Act 2008,
(c) the creation of a statutory duty for Integrated Care Boards to produce annual data on prevalence and complications of NTMC,
(d) a requirement that NTMC be included in the Single Patient Record, and
(e) any other matter that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to introduce regulation of non-therapeutic male circumcision, following several prevention of future death reports issued by coroners as a result of deaths arising from this procedure.
None 223
Baroness Walmsley (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Annual report on immunisation programmes
(1) The Secretary of State must, in respect of each financial year, prepare a report on the performance of the national immunisation programme.
(2) The report must be laid before Parliament, and published, in a timely and comprehensive manner.
(3) The report must cover the performance of—
(a) routine immunisation programmes,
(b) seasonal immunisation programmes, and
(c) targeted immunisation programmes,
forming part of the national immunisation programme.
(4) The report must cover the performance of those programmes in relation to all cohorts eligible for immunisation under the national immunisation programme.
(5) The report must use consistent measures of performance across the programmes reported on under this section.
(6) The report must include information that enables the tracking of inequalities in immunisation coverage and uptake—
(a) between different geographical areas in England, and
(b) between different population groups.
(7) In this section “national immunisation programme” means the programme of immunisation for England provided for in the exercise of functions of the Secretary of State, NHS England or an integrated care board (however the programme is described).”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to report annually to Parliament on the performance of routine, seasonal and targeted immunisation programmes, covering all eligible cohorts, using consistent measures across programmes, and enabling tracking of inequalities by geography and population group.
None 224
Baroness Walmsley (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to promote public health
All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
This new clause will place a duty on all ministers to consider health outcomes and the promotion of public health when exercising their duties.
None 225
Lord Rennard (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Continuity of specified national diabetes programmes
(1) The Secretary of State must secure that the programmes listed in subsection (2) continue to be provided, to at least the same extent as immediately before the abolition of NHS England.
(2) The programmes referred to in subsection (1) are—
(a) the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme;
(b) the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme;
(c) national provision for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for people with diabetes;
(d) the national roll-out of hybrid closed loop (“artificial pancreas”) technology for people with type 1 diabetes;
(e) the National Diabetes Audit Programme, including the National Diabetes Footcare Audit and the National Diabetes Inpatient Safety Audit;
(f) any other programme specified for the purposes of this section in regulations made by statutory instrument made by the Secretary of State.
(3) Before making a scheme under section 2 for the transfer of property, rights or liabilities relating to a programme listed in subsection (2) the Secretary of State must publish a statement explaining how continuity of that programme is to be maintained.
(4) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force, and at least once every subsequent period of 12 months, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on the provision of the programmes listed in subsection (2), including information on patient access, waiting times and outcomes.
(5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2)(f) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to maintain existing national diabetes prevention, treatment and audit programmes following the abolition of NHS England, to explain how continuity will be secured before transferring related functions, and to report annually to Parliament on their provision.
None 226
Lord Rennard (LD)After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause—
“Report on effect of abolition of NHS England on diabetes services
(1) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 1 comes into force, and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter for the following 3 years, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report assessing the effect of the abolition of NHS England on the planning, funding and delivery of diabetes prevention, treatment and care services in England.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of—
(a) any change in funding allocated to diabetes prevention, treatment and care programmes;
(b) any change to the operation or continuation of national clinical audits relating to diabetes;
(c) the impact on patient access to diabetes technology, including glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems;
(d) the impact on workforce capacity in specialist diabetes services.”
This new clause would require the Government to monitor and report to Parliament on the impact of NHS England’s abolition specifically on diabetes services.
Clause 5, page 3, line 34, after “carers” insert “, health and care partners,”
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 15 Oct 2026Clause 7, page 4, line 31 at end insert— "(1A) The Secretary of State must publish an independently verified long-term assessment of the workforce needs of the health service and a ten year education and training plan to deliver on those needs. (1B) The first assessment and plan under subsection (1A) must be published within one month of the day on which this Act is passed. (1C) The Secretary of State must keep the assessment and plan under review and revise both at least once every five years."
Clause 10, page 6, line 21, leave out “the health service” and insert “patients”
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause — "Right to a GP appointment (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to provide every patient with the right to receive a GP appointment within seven days of seeking one, or 24 hours if urgent. (2) The Secretary of State must, by regulations made by statutory instrument, amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/2996) to make the right described in subsection (1) a right in the NHS constitution. (3) The Secretary of State may review the scheme every three years from the day on which this Act is passed and amend it through regulations made by statutory instrument. (4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. (5) For the purposes of this section – "GP appointment" means an appointment with an appropriate clinician within a GP practice; "urgent" has the current definition provided under general practitioner triaging protocols."
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— "Secretary of State's duty as to social care (1) Section 1 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (Secretary of State's duty to promote comprehensive health service) is amended as follows. (2) In the heading, at the end insert "and social care". (3) After subsection (1) insert— "(1A) The Secretary of State must promote in England social care designed to secure improvement in outcomes for those who receive it."""
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— "Promoting palliative care equitably In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert— "1CA Duty to promote palliative care equitably In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure provision of palliative care across England accessible to all regardless of wealth or geography."""
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— "Support for older patients In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert— "1CA Duty to support older patients In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure adequate care for older patients, considering the prevention of ill health by the provision of health visitors focused on people aged 75 and above."""
Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert — "(2B) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards must have regard to the need to improve outcomes for adults with needs for care and to support unpaid carers, including in relation to the matters specified in section 1(2) of the Care Act 2014 (promoting individual well-being). (2C) A neighbourhood health plan must explain how the arrangements proposed in the plan are expected to contribute to the outcomes of adults with needs for care, including in relation to— (a) personal dignity and physical and mental health, (b) independence and control over day-to-day life, (c) domestic, family and personal relationships, (d) participation in work, education, training, recreation and community life, and (e) the suitability of living accommodation."
After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause- "Primary care investment standard (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards. (2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year. (3) Regulations under this section may make provision about- (a) the description of services that constitute "primary care services" for the purposes of this section; (b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced; (c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- "Retention of NHS number on following adoption (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person's NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a person's health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made. (3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to – (a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and (b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent. (4) In this section- "adoption order" has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; "health record" has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018; "NHS number" has the same meaning as "consistent identifier" in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012."
Clause 57, page 42, line 9, after “the” insert “physical access to the individual,”
Clause 57, page 42, line 17, at end insert – "(fc) the importance of the individual having physical access to others including health and care partners;"."
After Clause 64, insert the following new Clause- "NICE recommendations: integrated care board financial duties In section 237 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (advice, guidance, information and recommendations), after subsection (8A) (inserted by section 64 of this Act) insert – "(8B) Where provision made under subsection (8)(b) requires an integrated care board to comply with a recommendation, an integrated care board may not rely on a financial objective set under section 223L of the National Health Service Act 2006 (joint financial objectives for integrated care boards etc), or on section 223GC of that Act (financial duties of integrated care boards: expenditure limits), as grounds for refusing or delaying compliance with the recommendation, unless the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (8C) permitting it to do so. (8C) The Secretary of State may give an integrated care board a direction permitting it to defer compliance with a recommendation with which it is required to comply by virtue of provision made under subsection (8)(b) for a specified period, but only if satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify the deferral. (8D) A direction under subsection (8C) must- (a) specify the exceptional circumstances on which it is based, and (b) be published, together with the Secretary of State's reasons for giving it."""
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 15 Oct 2026After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "Healthwatch funding (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, bring forward a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and Local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14. (2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding in line with 2026/2027 inflation rates."
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- "National patient experience and feedback function (1) (2) The Secretary of State must secure arrangements for the exercise of a national patient experience and feedback function in relation to health services and social care services in England. The national patient experience and feedback function is to- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) gather, analyse and publish evidence about the experiences of patients, carers and service users of health services and social care services; identify and report on recurring concerns arising from those experiences; identify and report on inequalities in access, experience and outcomes; identify and report on the extent to which the views obtained reflect the diversity of the population served, including groups whose views have not been adequately captured; make recommendations for improvement to the Secretary of State, integrated care boards, local authorities, the Care Quality Commission and such other bodies as the Secretary of State considers appropriate; provide a route for concerns arising from local patient, carer and service user voice arrangements to be escalated to national bodies. (3) Arrangements under subsection (1) must secure – (a) (b) (c) (d) accessible routes for patients, carers, service users and the public to share views and concerns; specific arrangements to obtain and consider the views of people and communities who experience health inequalities, social exclusion, multiple disadvantage or other barriers to engagement and participation; arrangements for working with voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations; arrangements enabling findings, reports and recommendations to be published without prior approval by any body to which they relate; (e) arrangements for recommendations made under subsection (2)(e) to receive a published response from the body to which the recommendation is made. (4) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each financial year, a report setting out- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) the principal findings of the national patient experience and feedback function; recurring concerns identified under subsection (2)(b); inequalities identified under subsection (2)(c); groups whose views have not been adequately captured; recommendations made under subsection (2)(e); responses received and action taken in response to those recommendations; cases where no response, or no sufficient response, has been received; an assessment of the impact of action taken in response to recommendations made in previous financial years."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Fracture prevention services: implementation plan and reporting (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament an implementation plan for securing universal access in England by 2030 to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures. (2) The implementation plan must include- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) a baseline assessment of current access to, and quality of, such services in each integrated care board area, the minimum standards expected of such services, measurable annual milestones towards universal access by 2030, including milestones relating to the identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to reduce unwarranted variation in access to, and quality of, such services, and the outcomes by reference to which the effectiveness of implementation will be assessed, including the incidence of further fragility fractures and hip fractures. (3) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the publication of the implementation plan under subsection (1), and at intervals of no more than 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report setting out- (a) progress against the milestones in the implementation plan, (b) (c) changes in access to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures, and the number and proportion of eligible people identified, assessed, treated and followed up through such services, including variation between integrated care board areas. (4) In this section, "services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures" means services which provide for the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, including services commonly known as fracture liaison services."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Health and care partners After section 242A National Health Service Act 2006 insert- "242B Involvement of health and care partners (1) (2) (3) (4) A service user has a right to personal contact, without physical barriers or time limits, including contact in private, and to be accompanied in person by at least one health and care partner. Each health and care provider must make arrangements, as respects health or care services for which it is responsible, which secure that users of those services may be accompanied by at least one health and care partner during any period during which health or care services are provided to the service user or the service user is under the care or supervision of the health and care provider. For the purposes of this section a "health and care partner" is a named person chosen by the service user who provides care and support whether unpaid or paid to the service user. The following are "health and care providers" for the purposes of this section- (a) (b) (c) (d) an NHS Trust or NHS Foundation Trust, an integrated care board, an English local authority, a care home in England within the meaning of section 8 (3) Care Act 2014, (e) (f) a person or company providing health care or care services registered with the Care Quality Commission, or a person or company who provides care services to another person in return for payment. ""
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Corridor care (1) The Secretary of State must end the practice of corridor care in NHS hospitals within one year of the day on which this Act is passed. (2) (3) (4) (5) If the requirement under subsection (1) is not met, the Secretary of State must commission an independent inquiry into the Government's handling of corridor care. The inquiry under subsection (2) must- (a) (b) investigate the effectiveness of policies, funding and guidance relating to corridor care in the Department of Health and Social Care, assess the impact on patient safety and staff morale of the continued practice of corridor care, and (c) recommend steps the Secretary of State should take to end the practice of corridor care. The inquiry under subsection (1) should be supported by patient safety professionals from the Health Services Safety Investigations Body and the Care Quality Commission. The inquiry must publish and lay before Parliament a final report within 6 months of the day on which the inquiry is established."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme (1) Section 4 of the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows. (2) (3) In subsection (2) for "(4)" substitute "(4A)" After subsection (4) insert- "(4A) A person is within this subsection if they – (a) are a British citizen, (b) (c) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.'"
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- "Health strategy for people with learning disabilities (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health strategy for people with learning disabilities in England. The Secretary of State must appoint a co-national director with a learning disability to lead on its development. The strategy must be set out in, and aligned to, a new modern service framework, comprising- (a) (b) (c) (d) an evidence-based description of the standards of care that should be available across the health service in England for people with learning disabilities of all ages, the interventions and service models that must be implemented to improve outcomes for people with learning disabilities, including in particular (but not limited to) – (i) (ii) (iii) the steps to be taken to reduce early and avoidable mortality and close the gap in life expectancy for people with learning disabilities, the steps to be taken to reduce variation in the quality of and access to healthcare experienced by people with learning disabilities across integrated care board areas, the steps to be taken to improve the outcomes and experiences of people with learning disabilities, including their experiences of joined-up health and social care, being able to live healthier lives, and the support available to unpaid carers of people with learning disabilities, and (iv) the workforce requirements for delivering high-quality care, and the actions to be taken on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to learning disability healthcare, measurable outcomes and milestones against which progress will be assessed, including the collection and publication of an annual dataset at national and local level covering the matters in paragraph (b), and clear accountability for delivery at national and local level, including the appointment of one or more members of each integrated care board with responsibility for people with learning disabilities, and the publication of their details. The strategy must be accompanied by a plan for research to develop the evidence base for improving the health and life expectancy of people with learning disabilities. In preparing the strategy the Secretary of State must consult- (a) people with learning disabilities, their carers and supporters, and organisations representing the interests of people with learning disabilities,"
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Wheelchair services: standards, performance and outcomes (1) Each integrated care board must adopt national standards in accordance with section (National wheelchairs standards) which apply in its area in relation to the assessment for and supply of wheelchair services. (2) Each integrated care board must monitor its performance against the standards under subsection (1). (3) Each integrated care board must publish an annual report including— (a) its performance against the standards under subsection (1), (b) waiting times for the assessment for and supply of NHS wheelchair services, (c) the number and proportion of people waiting longer than 18 weeks for such equipment or services, (d) outcomes achieved for people by the provision of NHS wheelchair services, and (e) steps taken by the integrated care board to improve the assessment for, and supply of, NHS wheelchair services."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Cancer treatment: waiting times (1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral for such treatment. (2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS constitution for England for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral for such treatment. (3) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme to support NHS hospital trusts in meeting the requirement under subsection (1). (4) As part of the scheme, the Secretary of State must expand the capacity of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. (5) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to Parliament on progress on meeting the requirement under subsection (1). (6) Any statement made under subsection (5) should be made as close as reasonably practicable to 4 February. (7) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Accident and Emergency: waiting times (1) Within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision relating to Accident and Emergency Department admission. (2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS Constitution for England for every patient to be admitted into an Accident and Emergency Department within 12 hours of approval of their admission being made. (3) The Secretary of State must establish and implement an Accident and Emergency Scheme ("the Scheme") to support NHS hospital trusts to achieve the requirement referred to in subsection (2). (4) The Scheme must consider – (a) creating safety-net social care beds, (b) increasing step-down care, (c) publishing a dedicated accident and emergency care workforce plan, and (d) mandating that a qualified clinician must be present in every Accident and Emergency waiting room. (5) The Secretary of State must have due regard to the final report of the Independent Commission on Adult Social Care in establishing the scheme. (6) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Terminal illness: end of life care needs (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument impose a duty on integrated care boards to make provision for any person with a terminal illness diagnosis to be offered a conversation with a relevant healthcare professional about their needs for end-of-life care, including their – (a) mental and physical health support needs, and (b) financial support needs. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a person with a terminal illness diagnosis is unable to have the conversation, an integrated care board must ensure that the person's next-of-kin are offered a conversation. (3) Regulations under this section must make provision for any relevant authorities to have regard to the needs identified in a conversation under subsection (1). (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Medical disinformation strategy (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation ("the strategy"). (2) The strategy must consider support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with patients who are vaccine-hesitant or have questions about vaccination. (3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Health Service Commissioner In section 1 of the Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 (the Commissioner), after subsection (1) insert— "(1A) The office of Health Service Commissioner for England cannot be held by the person who holds the office of Parliamentary Commissioner (as defined by the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967). """
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Reporting on outcomes for children (1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows. (2) In section 14Z58 (integrated care boards: annual report), after subsection (4) insert— "(4A) An annual report must also include – (a) a statement of outcomes for children in the board's area during the financial year, by reference to the indicators specified under section (Reporting on outcomes for children)(4)(a) of the Health Act 2026, (b) a statement of the targeted investment made by the board during the financial year, by reference to the guidance specified under section (Reporting on outcomes for children) (4) (b) of the Health Act 2026, setting out the purposes for which it was allocated and the indicators to which it relates, (c) an explanation of the statement under paragraphs (a) and (b), including changes to outcomes and targeted investment from the previous financial year and any steps the board proposes to take as a result, and (d) an explanation of the relationship between the board's targeted investment and outcomes for children. (4B) In subsection (4A) – "children" means persons under the age of 18; "targeted investment" means expenditure allocated by the Secretary of State or an integrated care board for the purpose of improving outcomes for children by reference to the indicators specified under subsection (4) of section (Reporting on outcomes for children) of the Health Act 2026." (3) The Secretary of State must, as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year, prepare and lay before Parliament a report on health-related outcomes of and targeted investment for children in England. (4) The Secretary of State must specify and publish— (a) indicators of outcomes for children, and (b) the expenditure that is, or is not, to be treated as targeted investment, for the purposes of this section and section 14Z58(4A) of the National Health Service Act 2006. (5) A report under subsection (3) must include— (a) a statement of outcomes for children in England, and in each integrated care board area, by reference to the indicators specified under subsection (4), (b) a statement of the amount of targeted investment made during the financial year by the Secretary of State and by each integrated care board, and of the change from the previous financial year, (c) an assessment of the relationship between targeted investment and outcomes for children, (d) an assessment of variation in outcomes and targeted investment between integrated care board areas, and of changes since the previous financial year, and (e) a statement of any steps the Secretary of State proposes to take as a result. (6) Before specifying indicators under subsection (4)(a) or publishing guidance under subsection (4)(b), the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including persons with expertise in child health. (7) The first report under subsection (3) must relate to the first full financial year beginning after the day on which this section comes into force."
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— "Prostate cancer early detection programme: implementation plan The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a prostate cancer early detection programme implementation plan, including a funding assessment, service specification, workforce implications, and an equality impact assessment."
After Schedule 12, insert the following new Schedule— "SCHEDULE Section NATIONAL WHEELCHAIRS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 The Committee must consist of a chairman appointed by the Secretary of State and not less than 10 nor more than 13 other members so appointed. 2 Each member of the Committee may be appointed to hold office for such a period of not more than 5 years, nor less than 3 years, as the Secretary of State may determine. 3 The Secretary of State may, at any time before the expiration of the term of office of any member, extend or further extend that member's term of office, but no one extension may be for a period of more than 5 years from the date when the term of office would otherwise expire. 4 Any member— (a) is eligible for reappointment from time to time on or after the expiration of their term of office; (b) may by notice in writing to the Secretary of State resign office at any time, while remaining eligible for reappointment. 5 At least one third of the members of the Committee must be users of NHS wheelchair services. 6 The Secretary of State may remove a member of the Committee on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour. 7 The Secretary of State must appoint a secretary to the Committee and may appoint such other officers as necessary to the Committee, and there may be paid to them by the Secretary of State such salaries and allowances as the Secretary of State may with the consent of the Treasury determine. 8 The expenses of the Committee to such an amount as approved by the Treasury must be paid by the Secretary of State. 9 There may be paid as part of the expenses of the Committee — (a) to all or any of the members of the Committee, such salaries or other remuneration and travelling and other allowances, and (b) to persons attending its meetings at the request of the Committee, such travelling and other allowances (including compensation for loss of remunerative time), as the Secretary of State may with the consent of the Treasury determine. 10 The Secretary of State may pay or make provision for paying, to or in respect of any member of the Committee, such sums by way of pensions, superannuation allowances and gratuities as the Secretary of State may determine with the consent of the Treasury. 11 Where a person ceases to be a member of the Committee otherwise than on the expiry of their term of office and it appears to the Secretary of State that there are special circumstances which allow for the person to receive compensation, the Secretary of State may make to the person a payment of such amount as the Secretary of State may determine with the consent of the Treasury. 12 The Committee may act notwithstanding any vacancy among the members. 13 The Committee may make rules for regulating its procedure (including the quorum of the Committee)."
After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— “Abolition of NHS England: transition plan (1) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a transition plan in relation to the abolition of NHS England. (2) The transition plan must set out— (a) the objectives which the abolition of NHS England is intended to achieve; (b) the arrangements and timetable for transferring the functions, property, rights and liabilities of NHS England; (c) the bodies to which those functions, property, rights and liabilities are expected to be transferred; (d) the estimated gross costs associated with the abolition of NHS England and the implementation of the arrangements mentioned in paragraph (b); (e) the estimated costs of redundancies, voluntary exits, pension liabilities and other staff-related payments arising from— (i) the abolition of NHS England, (ii) the restructuring of the Department of Health and Social Care, (iii) changes affecting integrated care boards, and (iv) changes affecting commissioning support units; (f) the estimated costs associated with— (i) the transfer, retention or disposal of property, (ii) the transfer, variation or termination of contracts, (iii) the transfer of information technology, data, records and other systems, (iv) the establishment or modification of governance and accountability arrangements, (v) the recruitment and training of staff, (vi) the retention or replacement of specialist staff and expertise, (vii) consultancy and other external professional services, and (viii) any other activity required to implement the abolition; (g) the estimated recurring annual savings expected to arise from the abolition of NHS England; (h) the extent to which the savings mentioned in paragraph (g) are expected to constitute cash-releasing savings; (i) the methodology, assumptions and baseline against which the costs and savings mentioned in this subsection are to be calculated; (j) the financial year in which the total cumulative savings arising from the abolition of NHS England are expected to exceed the total cumulative costs of implementing that abolition; (k) the existing departmental, health service or other budgets from which transition costs are to be met; (l) the effect which meeting transition costs from the budgets identified under paragraph (k) is expected to have on— (i) the provision of health services, (ii) planned capital and technology expenditure, (iii) integrated care boards, (iv) workforce budgets, and (v) other departmental programmes; (m) the amount of any savings expected to be made available for the provision of front-line health services and the arrangements by which those savings are to be identified, transferred and monitored; (n) the principal clinical, financial and operational risks associated with the transition; (o) the measures to be taken to secure the continuity of services during the transition; (p) the measures to be taken to identify, retain and transfer staff with specialist knowledge or expertise; (q) the arrangements for the transfer and continued operation of nationally significant services, contracts, information systems and corporate holdings; (r) the measures by which the Secretary of State will assess whether the objectives mentioned in paragraph (a) have been achieved. (3) The estimates contained in the transition plan must distinguish between— (a) one-off transition costs, (b) recurring expenditure, (c) gross savings, (d) net savings, (e) cash-releasing savings, and (f) non-cashable efficiencies or avoided future costs. (4) The Secretary of State must arrange for the transition plan, including its financial estimates, methodology and assumptions, to be reviewed by an independent person with experience of public-sector finance, organisational restructuring or health service administration. (5) A person carrying out a review under subsection (4) must assess— (a) whether the estimates in the transition plan are reasonable, (b) whether the plan identifies the full costs of implementation, (c) whether the methodology and assumptions used to calculate costs and savings are reasonable and have been applied consistently, (d) whether the distinction between gross, net and cash-releasing savings is clear and supportable, (e) whether the expected break-even date is supported by the available evidence, and (f) whether the arrangements for managing risks and maintaining operational continuity are adequate. (6) The person carrying out the review must prepare a report setting out the conclusions of the review. (7) The Secretary of State must publish, alongside the transition plan— (a) the report prepared under subsection (6), (b) the name of the person who carried out the review, (c) a statement of that person’s relevant experience and qualifications, (d) a description of the process by which that person was appointed, and (e) a declaration of any interests which might reasonably be thought to affect that person’s independence. (8) The Secretary of State must lay the transition plan and the report prepared under subsection (6) before Parliament. (9) The Secretary of State must comply with subsections (1) to (8) before making regulations bringing section 1 or 2 into force. (10) In this section— “cash-releasing savings” means a reduction in expenditure which releases resources that may be reallocated without reducing the level or quality of services provided; “front-line health services” means services provided directly for the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of illness, or for the care of patients; “NHS England” means the National Health Service Commissioning Board.”
After Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— “Supply Chain Coordination Limited (1) Before making a transfer scheme under section 2 which relates to shares held by NHS England in Supply Chain Coordination Limited, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the proposed future ownership and governance of that company. (2) The report must set out— (a) the person to whom the shares are to be transferred; (b) the reasons for selecting that person; (c) the date on which the transfer is intended to take effect; (d) the person who will exercise the shareholder function during the transfer period; (e) the person who will exercise the shareholder function following completion of the transfer; (f) the arrangements by which the exercise of the shareholder function will be overseen and held to account; (g) any proposed change to the company’s articles of association, governance arrangements, objectives or operating model; (h) the arrangements for ensuring continuity in the procurement, storage, distribution and supply of medicines, medical devices, equipment and other goods required by the health service; (i) an assessment of the principal risks to procurement and supply resilience arising from the transfer; (j) arrangements for managing shortages, disruption or failure of supply; (k) the arrangements for retaining staff with expertise necessary for the continued operation of the company; (l) the contingency arrangements which will apply if the transfer cannot be completed or gives rise to a material risk of disruption; (n) a summary of any independent assurance obtained concerning the proposed transfer and the continuity and resilience of the services provided by the company. (3) The Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate before preparing the report.”
Clause 4, page 3, line 24, leave out “have regard to the need to” and insert “take steps to achieve”
Clause 4, page 3, line 25, leave out “reduce inequalities” and insert “a reduction in inequalities”
Clause 4, page 3, line 27, leave out “reduce inequalities” and insert “a reduction in inequalities”
Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert— “(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to their ability to access services and make provision for a system of equitable distribution of general medical practitioners in England.”
Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert— “(c) reduce inequalities in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, including variation in access to structured education, glucose monitoring technology and insulin pump therapy.”
Clause 5, page 4, leave out lines 2 to 4 and insert— “(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must act with a view to enabling patients to make choices with respect to aspects of health services provided to them, including to make choices as to the provider of those services. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Secretary of State must ensure that patients who are referred for a service to be provided outside a hospital setting (“out-of-hospital services”) are offered a choice of provider of that service from among the providers available in their integrated care board area and, where relevant, in neighbouring areas, in accordance with regulations made under section 14Z45B. (3) Regulations under section 14Z45B must provide that, where an out-of-hospital service is to be provided to a patient, the integrated care board must— (a) offer the patient a meaningful choice of at least two providers capable of providing the service, which may include NHS bodies and independent sector providers approved to provide that service under arrangements with the integrated care board, (b) provide the patient with information to support an informed choice, including for each available provider— (i) indicative waiting times, (ii) the location at which the service would be provided, (iii) the quality ratings or outcomes data applicable to that provider for that service where such data is available, and (iv) whether any costs would be incurred by the patient in travelling to or receiving the service at that provider, (c) not exclude from the list of available providers any provider approved solely on grounds of commercial interest or organisational type, and (d) take all reasonable steps to give effect to the patient’s choice within a clinically appropriate timeframe. (4) For the purposes of this section, “out-of-hospital services” means services— (a) provided in community, primary care or ambulatory settings rather than in a hospital inpatient or outpatient department, and (b) which the Secretary of State specifies by regulations as being within the scope of the choice obligation under subsection (2), and may include diagnostic services, audiology and hearing aid care, podiatry, dietetics and nutrition, physiotherapy, ambulatory cardiac monitoring and such other services as the Secretary of State may specify. (5) In specifying services under subsection (4)(b), the Secretary of State must have regard to— (a) the potential for the expansion of choice to reduce waiting times for the relevant service, (b) the availability of sufficient independent and NHS providers to make genuine choice meaningful, and (c) the desirability of ensuring access to choice for patients in all parts of England, including in rural and deprived areas. (6) The Secretary of State must publish, and lay before Parliament, within 12 months of the date on which this Act is passed, a statement setting out— (a) the out-of-hospital services for which choice obligations under subsection (2) will initially apply, (b) the timetable for extending the choice obligation to further services, and (c) the support that will be made available to patients, in particular those with limited digital access or literacy, to exercise the choices to which they are entitled under this section. (7) The Secretary of State must review and update the statement required by subsection (6) at intervals of not more than two years.”
Clause 6, page 4, line 11, at end insert— “(1A) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, promoting innovation in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, including through the adoption of glucose monitoring and automated insulin delivery technologies.”
Clause 8, page 5, leave out lines 19 to 24 and insert— “(5) Where the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish a statement before the end of the period of seven working days beginning with the day on which the direction is given. (6) A statement published under subsection (5) must set out— (a) the statutory function in respect of which the direction is given, (b) the reasons for giving the direction, (c) the period for which the direction is to have effect, (d) the date by which the operation of the direction is to be reviewed, (e) any payment which the Secretary of State has made, or intends to make, to an integrated care board under subsection (4) in connection with the direction, (f) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the financial and operational effects of the direction on each integrated care board to which it applies, (g) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the effect of the direction on the ability of each integrated care board to meet the needs and priorities of its local population, and (h) the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and each integrated care board to which the direction applies for the exercise of the function and for any outcomes arising from its exercise. (7) If the Secretary of State varies or revokes a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must publish— (a) the variation or revocation before the end of the period of seven days beginning with the day on which a direction is made, and (b) a statement setting out the reasons for the variation or revocation and its expected financial and operational effects.”
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 10 stand part of the Bill.
Clause 11, page 7, line 6, at end insert— “(3A) The Secretary of State may give a direction under this section only if satisfied that— (a) the objective of the direction cannot reasonably be achieved by – (i) the giving of guidance, (ii) agreement with the integrated care board, (iii) the exercise of existing oversight or performance management arrangements, or (iv) any other means which would involve less restriction of the integrated care board’s discretion, (b) the direction is necessary and proportionate to the objective which it seeks to achieve, (c) the benefits expected to arise from the direction, including any benefits arising from consistency between different areas, outweigh any restriction which the direction would place on the ability of the integrated care board to respond to the needs and priorities of its local population, and (d) the integrated care board has been consulted in accordance with subsection (3C). (3B) In deciding whether to give a direction under this section, and in determining the terms of any such direction, the Secretary of State must have regard to— (a) the desirability of decisions relating to the provision of health services being taken at the most local level reasonably appropriate, (b) the desirability of integrated care boards having sufficient autonomy to respond to the needs and priorities of their local populations, (c) the importance of maintaining clear and identifiable responsibility for decisions and outcomes, (d) the likely financial and operational effects of the direction on the integrated care board, and (e) the availability to the integrated care board of the resources necessary to comply with the direction. (3C) Before giving a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must— (a) provide the integrated care board with a proposed draft of the direction, (b) provide the integrated care board with a statement of – (i) the objective of the proposed direction, (ii) the reasons why the Secretary of State considers the conditions in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) to be satisfied, (iii) the expected financial and operational effects of the proposed direction, and (iv) any additional financial or other resources which the Secretary of State proposes to make available to enable the integrated care board to comply with the direction, (c) allow the integrated care board a reasonable period in which to make representations, and (d) have regard to any representations made by the integrated care board. (3D) The Secretary of State may give a direction without complying with subsection (3A)(d) or (3C) only if satisfied that— (a) there is an urgent need to protect the health or safety of the public or the continuity of essential health services, and (b) the delay involved in complying with those subsections would create a serious risk of harm. (3E) Where the Secretary of State gives a direction in reliance on subsection (3D), the Secretary of State must— (a) consult the integrated care board as soon as reasonably practicable after giving the direction, (b) provide the integrated care board with the information specified in subsection (3C)(b), (c) have regard to any representations subsequently made by the integrated care board, and (d) before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day on which the direction was given, decide whether to confirm, vary or revoke the direction. (3F) A direction given in reliance on subsection (3D) ceases to have effect at the end of the period specified in subsection (3E)(d) unless, before the end of that period, the Secretary of State – (a) confirms or varies the direction, (b) publishes the reasons for that decision, and (c) publishes an assessment of whether the conditions in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) continue to be satisfied. (3G) A direction under this section must be no broader, and remain in effect for no longer, than is necessary to achieve its stated objective.”
Clause 11, page 7, leave out lines 10 to 17 and insert— “(5) Where the Secretary of State has given a direction under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish a statement before the end of the period of seven working days beginning with the day on which the direction is given. (6) A statement published under subsection (5) must set out— (a) the statutory function to which the direction relates, (b) the legal basis for the direction, (c) the reasons for giving the direction, (d) the period for which the direction is to have effect, (e) the date by which the operation of the direction is to be reviewed, (f) the Secretary of State’s assessment of the financial and operational effects of the direction on each integrated care board to which it applies, (g) whether any additional funding or other resources are to be made available to an integrated care board for the purpose of complying with the direction and, if so, the amount or description of those resources, (h) the Secretary of State’s assessment of whether, and to what extent, the direction restricts the ability of an integrated care board to determine or meet the needs and priorities of its local population, (i) the outcomes which the direction is intended to achieve, and (j) the respective responsibilities of the Secretary of State and each integrated care board to which the direction applies for decisions taken and outcomes arising while the direction is in effect. (7) Where a direction is given in reliance on subsection (3), the statement under subsection (6) must also – (a) identify the opinion formed by the Secretary of State, (b) set out the reasons for that opinion, and (c) explain why the Secretary of State considers it appropriate for the integrated care board not to form its own opinion in relation to the exercise of the function. (8) If the Secretary of State varies or revokes a direction under this section, the Secretary of State must— (a) publish the variation or revocation before the end of the period of seven days beginning with the day on which it is made, and (b) publish a statement setting out the reasons for the variation or revocation and its expected financial and operational effects.”
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 14 Oct 2026After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— “Cancer outcomes In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1GA insert— “1GB Cancer outcomes In exercising functions relating to the health service, the Secretary of State must treat objectives relating to cancer outcomes as having priority over any other objectives relating specifically to cancer.””
After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— “Ministerial responsibility for social care In section 1(3) of the National Health Service Act 2006 (ministerial responsibility to Parliament), after “service” insert “, and the promotion of social care,”.”
LORD PATEL
Tabled: 14 Oct 2026After Clause 11, insert the following new Clause— “Promoting continuity of care In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1A insert— “1AA Duty to promote continuity of care In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must promote continuity of care for patients by health professionals.””
Clause 12, page 10, line 10, at end insert— “(5) Before making regulations under subsection (1)(b) which would have the effect of transferring responsibility for the commissioning of services for the diagnosis, treatment or management of allergic disease from the Secretary of State to integrated care boards, the Secretary of State must— (a) assess the adequacy and geographical distribution of specialist allergy services in England; (b) assess the capacity of integrated care boards to commission appropriate allergy services; (c) consult persons with relevant clinical expertise, integrated care boards, patients and organisations representing people affected by allergic disease. (6) The assessment under subsection (5) must have particular regard to – (a) access to specialist allergy expertise, (b) the integration of allergy services across primary, community and secondary care, and (c) unwarranted geographical variation in access to allergy diagnosis and treatment.”
Schedule 1, page 77, line 34, at end insert— “45A After section 133 insert— “133A Emergency intervention in pharmaceutical services (1) Where an integrated care board considers that a person providing pharmaceutical services is failing, or is likely to fail, materially to comply with— (a) a contractual obligation, (b) a patient-safety requirement, or (c) a workforce obligation, the board must consider whether emergency intervention is required to protect patients or continuity of pharmaceutical services. (2) Where the board considers that emergency intervention is required, it may – (a) require the provider to take specified remedial action, (b) suspend specified arrangements, (c) terminate arrangements with the provider, (d) make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services, or (e) take any combination of the steps in paragraphs (a) to (d). (3) The powers in subsection (2) must be exercised with regard to the need to maintain continuity of medicines supply and protect patients from avoidable disruption. (4) An integrated care board must not continue arrangements with a provider where it is satisfied that the provider is demonstrably unfit to provide pharmaceutical services safely and effectively. (5) Before exercising a power under subsection (2), the board must, except in an emergency, give the provider a reasonable opportunity to make representations. (6) Nothing in this section prevents an integrated care board from taking immediate action where delay would materially risk patient safety or continuity of medicines supply.””
Schedule 1, page 82, line 40, at end insert— “(3D) Regulations made under subsection (1) must ensure that the remuneration arrangements for pharmaceutical services take account of the costs of providing those services in rural and sparsely populated areas. (3E) In making provision under subsection (3D), the determining authority must have regard to – (a) rurality, (b) the age profile of the population, (c) transport and distribution costs, (d) seasonal changes in demand, (e) difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff, and (f) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated areas. (3F) The remuneration arrangements must be designed to support the financial sustainability of pharmacies providing essential NHS services in rural and sparsely populated areas. (3G) The Secretary of State must review the operation of the remuneration arrangements periodically and make such changes as are necessary to ensure that the matters in subsections (3D) to (3F) continue to be reflected.”
Clause 15, page 11, line 25, at end insert— “(2A) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to ensure that arrangements under subsection (2) are accessible and inclusive, having particular regard to the needs of – (a) persons with disabilities, and (b) persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions.”
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— “Women’s centres After section 14Z35 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert— “14Z35B Duty to cooperate: integrated care boards and women’s centres (1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, cooperate with women’s centres for the purpose of – (a) tackling health inequalities affecting women, and (b) improving the prevention, diagnosis and treatment including awareness of and access to treatment of women’s health needs and wellbeing. (2) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, a requirement for the integrated care board to— (a) secure the involvement of women’s centres in the planning of commissioning arrangements and decisions about the provision of services relevant to women’s health, including services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage, (b) arrangements under subsection (2)(a) may include, in particular— (i) delivery of NHS services from, or in connection with, women’s centres, (ii) the commissioning of services from women’s centres, (iii) the establishment of enhancing of referral pathways between NHS services and women’s centres, and (iv) other forms of cooperation with the integrated care board considers likely to improve women’s access to health care or reduce health inequalities, (c) have regard, when exercising its functions under sections 14Z35 (duties as to reducing inequalities) and 14Z45 (public involvement and consultation), to the views of women’s centres, (d) work with women’s centres to identify, monitor and review health inequalities and barriers to accessing health care provision affecting women in the integrated care board’s boundary, and (e) have regard, in exercising its functions under this section, to any strategy or policy statement relating to women’s health published or approved by the Secretary of State. (3) In complying with subsection (2), an integrated care board must secure that women’s centres are, so far as reasonably practicable— (a) involved in the preparation and review of any strategy or plan prepared by the integrated care board that relates to women’s health, and (b) consulted on proposals by the integrated care board that may have a significant impact on the provision of services to women in its boundary. (4) In this section— “women’s centre” means a locally based community organisation within the board’s boundaries that specialises in supporting women, that— (a) is a social purpose body, (b) provides multi-faceted and therapeutic support to women experiencing multiple disadvantage, and (c) provides women-only services or facilities appropriate to the needs and safety of the women using those services; “multiple disadvantage” means a person’s experiences of two or more of the following— (a) poverty or financial exclusion, (b) homelessness, (c) victimisation including domestic abuse, sexual violence and exploitation, (d) contact with the criminal justice system, (e) mental ill health, physical ill health and substance dependence, and (f) other circumstances as may be prescribed; “social purpose body” means any body corporate or unincorporated association whose primary purpose is to advance charitable, community, social, environmental, cultural or other public benefit objectives, and whose governing arrangements ensure that any profits or surpluses are applied wholly or principally in furtherance of those objectives rather than for private distribution; “therapeutic support services” means services whose principal purpose is to improve or maintain the mental, emotional, physical or social wellbeing of individuals through therapeutic, rehabilitative, preventative or recovery-focused interventions, and includes services provided in community, residential, educational or healthcare settings.””
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause — “Integrated care board annual reports: ministerial directions (1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows. (2) In section 14Z58 (annual report), after subsection 2(d) insert— “(e) contain, in relation to each relevant direction which had effect in relation to the integrated care board during the financial year – (i) a copy of, or a reference to the place of publication of, the direction, (ii) the period during which the direction had effect, (iii) a description of the decisions taken by the integrated care board which were materially affected by the direction, (iv) the expenditure incurred by the integrated care board in complying with the direction, (v) the amount of any additional funding or other resources provided by the Secretary of State in connection with the direction, (vi) a description of any clinical, financial or operational risks which the integrated care board advised the Secretary of State would arise, or were likely to arise, from the direction, (vii) a description of any steps taken by the integrated care board or the Secretary of State to mitigate those risks, (viii) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on its ability to discharge its functions, (ix) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on its ability to meet the needs and priorities of its local population, (x) the integrated care board’s assessment of the effect of the direction on the delivery of its plans and priorities for the financial year, and (xi) a description of any outcome for which the integrated care board considers that responsibility was materially shared with, or rested wholly or principally with, the Secretary of State by reason of the direction. (3) Where information required by (2)(e) has been included in another document published by the integrated care board, the annual report may comply with that subsection by— (a) identifying the document, (b) stating where the document may be accessed free of charge, and (c) providing a summary of the information. (4) In this section, “relevant direction” means a direction given by the Secretary of State under— (a) section 7B, (b) section 14Z61, (c) section 14Z62A, or (d) section 223GA.” (3) In section 14Z59 (duty to keep experience of members under review), or in such other provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, references to the integrated care board’s annual report are to be read subject to the requirements inserted by subsection (2).”
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause — “Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards (1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to— (a) service redesign, (b) integration of health services, (c) development of neighbourhood health services, and (d) population health planning. (2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes – (a) providers of primary medical services, (b) community pharmacy contractors, (c) providers of primary dental services, and (d) providers of ophthalmic services and registered medical practitioners with specialist expertise in ophthalmology. (3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes – (a) involvement at an early stage in the development of integrated care board proposals, (b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in integrated care board functions, (c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence integrated care board decision making, and (d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of integrated care board functions. (4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing – (a) how it has complied with this section, and (b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the integrated care board. (5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— “Duty to identify and record unpaid carers After section 14Z44 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert— “14Z44A Duty to identify and record unpaid carers (1) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to identify persons within its area who are unpaid carers. (2) An integrated care board must make arrangements to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area— (a) maintain appropriate systems for recording whether a person is an unpaid carer, (b) use consistent coding standards for the recording of unpaid carers in health records, (c) review and update records relating to unpaid carers at appropriate intervals, and (d) ensure that the identification and recording of unpaid carers forms part of— (i) primary care registration processes, (ii) hospital discharge procedures, (iii) care planning processes, and (iv) other relevant patient contact pathways. (3) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause— “Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert— “14Z44A Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers (1) Each integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to improving and maintaining the physical health, mental health, and wellbeing of carers within its area. (2) In exercising its duties under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to— (a) reduction of health inequalities experienced by carers, (b) prevention of deterioration in carers’ physical and mental health, (c) involvement of carers in decisions relating to the care of persons for whom they provide care, and (d) the need to ensure carers are able to access appropriate preventative and other health services and support. (3) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area— (a) consider the health and wellbeing needs of carers in care planning and discharge processes, (b) involve carers appropriately in decisions relating to care and treatment, and (c) provide carers with information about support available to them for their health and wellbeing. (4) In preparing a Joint Forward Plan, an integrated care board must include— (a) an assessment of the health and wellbeing needs of carers within its area, (b) steps the integrated care board proposes to take to improve outcomes for carers, and (c) measures for reducing inequalities experienced by carers. (5) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert — “(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must set out, by reference to the assessed needs and the respective functions of the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards— (a) the changes proposed in the pattern of health services, care and support to strengthen prevention, early intervention and support in people’s homes and communities, (b) how the bodies propose to exercise their commissioning and other relevant functions to achieve those changes, (c) the workforce, provider and community capacity required to deliver the proposed changes and the arrangements for developing that capacity, (d) the resources required, including any proposed reallocation of resources and investment required during transition, (e) any material difference in financial incentives, costs or benefits between the bodies which could impede the proposed changes, and the arrangements proposed to address it, and (f) how progress in implementing the changes and their effects on outcomes for people will be assessed. (2C) In preparing the matters required by subsection (2B), the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards must have regard to the need to maintain continuity and safe access to necessary services during transition.”
Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert— “(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must describe the arrangements which the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards propose to make, in the exercise of their respective functions and with relevant providers of health and care services, for – (a) taking reasonable steps to identify unpaid carers and, where appropriate, record their caring responsibilities, (b) providing unpaid carers with accessible information and advice about support available to them, (c) enabling an unpaid carer who may have needs for support to be referred or otherwise connected, as appropriate, to the responsible local authority for consideration of an assessment under section 10 of the Care Act 2014 or sections 17ZA or 17ZD of the Children Act 1989, (d) recognising unpaid carers’ own physical and mental health and wellbeing needs, including in care planning and hospital discharge arrangements, and (e) ensuring that identification and planning do not proceed on an assumption that an unpaid carer is willing or able to provide or continue providing care. (2C) In subsection (2B), “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care, including practical or emotional support, for another person otherwise than under or by virtue of a contract or as voluntary work, and includes a young carer within the meaning of section 17ZA of the Children Act 1989 and a parent carer within the meaning of section 17ZD of that Act.”
Clause 25, page 18, line 17, at end insert— “(2B) A neighbourhood health plan must set out how the needs of persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions are to be met by the exercise of functions of the responsible local authority and its partner integrated care boards.”
The above-named Lords give notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 30 stand part of the Bill.
After Clause 39, insert the following new Clause— “Duty of NHS boards to report medical malpractice (1) A member of the board of directors of an NHS trust or an NHS foundation trust in England must report any evidence or reports they have seen of systemic medical malpractice within the trust to— (a) the Care Quality Commission, (b) the Department of Health and Social Care, and (c) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body. (2) The board of directors of an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust in England has a collective duty to— (a) refer the trust to the Care Quality Commission, and (b) alert the Department of Health and Social Care and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body if staff employed by, or acting on behalf of, the trust raise concerns of systemic medical malpractice. (3) In this section, “systemic medical malpractice” means an action or omission in the provision of health care that falls below the expected standard of care and indicates a widespread, patterned, or recurring failure within the systems, processes, or governance of the trust.”
Clause 43, page 31, line 12, at end insert — “(7) Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that a pharmacy provider has materially failed to comply with contractual, patient-safety or workforce obligations, the Secretary of State may by direction require the relevant integrated care board – (a) to suspend or terminate arrangements with that provider, where appropriate, (b) to make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services, (c) to secure continuity of the supply of medicines and other pharmaceutical services, and (d) to take such other emergency measures as may be specified in the direction. (8) A direction under subsection (7) may be given where the Secretary of State considers that there is a significant risk to patient safety, continuity of medicines supply or the provision of pharmaceutical services. (9) The Secretary of State must ensure that arrangements made under subsection (7) are implemented as soon as reasonably practicable. (10) A direction under subsection (7) must specify the period for which it has effect and must be published.”
Clause 43, page 31, line 12, at end insert — “(7) Where a situation or event has resulted, or is likely to result, in the closure, failure or disruption of a provider of pharmaceutical services, the Secretary of State and the relevant integrated care board must provide such assistance and support as is reasonably necessary to enable a new provider to establish or continue the provision of pharmaceutical services. (8) Assistance or support under subsection (7) may include facilitating and establishing a relationship between a new provider and the manufacturers or suppliers of medicines and other pharmaceutical products. (9) The assistance and support under subsection (7) must be available, in particular, where a new provider is – (a) taking over premises previously operated by a provider of pharmaceutical services that has failed or closed, (b) taking over premises where there has been evidence of serious misconduct, including malpractice or failure to pay staff, or (c) an independent provider or a provider which is not part of a large company operating multiple pharmacy premises. (10) The purpose of assistance and support under this section is to enable the new provider to secure supplies of medicines and other pharmaceutical products as quickly as reasonably practicable and to minimise any interruption in the provision of pharmaceutical services.”
After Clause 43, insert the following new Clause— “Protection of pharmacy staff during provider failure (1) The Secretary of State must establish arrangements to protect the pay and essential employment protections of staff employed by a provider of pharmaceutical services where the provider – (a) becomes insolvent, (b) ceases to provide pharmaceutical services, (c) has its arrangements for providing pharmaceutical services suspended or terminated, or (d) is otherwise unable to meet its obligations to its employees. (2) Arrangements under subsection (1) must provide for – (a) the continuation, so far as reasonably practicable, of payment of wages to affected staff, (b) the preservation of essential employment protections during the period of emergency intervention, (c) the maintenance of staffing necessary for the safe provision of pharmaceutical services, and (d) the transfer, continuation or replacement of employment arrangements where necessary to secure continuity of pharmaceutical services. (3) The Secretary of State may make payments to, or in respect of, affected staff for the purposes of this section. (4) The Secretary of State may recover from the failed provider any sums paid under subsection (3). (5) Arrangements under this section must be capable of operating at the same time as arrangements made under section 133 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (inadequate provision of pharmaceutical services) to secure alternative provision of pharmaceutical services. (6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the operation of arrangements under this section.”
Clause 48, page 33, line 10, at end insert— “(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
Clause 48, page 33, line 14, after “(1)” insert “or (2A)”
Clause 48, page 33, line 37, at end insert— “(f) require the integrated care board to use a portion of designated amount for the provision of social care services and support for the physical and mentalhealth and wellbeing of unpaid carers.”
After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause— “Primary care investment standard (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards. (2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year. (3) Regulations under this section may make provision about— (a) the description of services that constitute “primary care services” for the purposes of this section; (b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced; (c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be may unless a draft has been approved by resolution of both Houses of Parliament.”
Clause 52, page 36, line 15, after “available” insert “for the purpose of delivering or improving patient health or social care”
Clause 52, page 36, line 18, leave out “health” and insert “direct patient”
Clause 52, page 36, line 19, at end insert— “(1A) The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers.”
Clause 52, page 36, line 28, leave out “including” and insert “solely for the purposes of”
Clause 52, page 36, leave out lines 38 to 40
Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert— “(4A) In making the regulations the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure – (a) that adult social care providers and people drawing on care are represented in the design of shared care records, the single patient record, interoperability standards and the wider analogue-to-digital shift; (b) that a clear national route for relevant social care data is made available to authorised health and care professionals without requiring separate local integrations for every provider and area.”
Clause 52, page 37, line 9, at end insert — “(b) lay an assessment before Parliament on the readiness of the National Health Service to implement the single patient record. This assessment must include— (i) the interoperability, cybersecurity and operational resilience of relevant systems, (ii) compliance with data protection requirements, (iii) workforce and training requirements, (iv) the adequacy of hardware, connectivity and identity-management systems, (v) the estimated implementation and recurring costs, (vi) the capital funding to be made available to providers requiring upgrades, (vii) the measures to be taken to prevent digital exclusion, and (viii) a summary of any relevant independent technical, cybersecurity and data protection assurance obtained by the Secretary of State.”
Clause 48, page 33, line 37, at end insert- "(f) require the integrated care board to use a portion of designated amount for the provision of social care services and support for the physical and mentalhealth and wellbeing of unpaid carers."
After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause- "Primary care investment standard (1) The Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a primary care investment standard for integrated care boards. (2) The primary care investment standard must require each integrated care board to increase its spending on primary care services, in each financial year, by at least the same proportion as any increase in the level of its total programme funding for that year. (3) Regulations under this section may make provision about- (a) the description of services that constitute “primary care services” for the purposes of this section; (b) how compliance with the primary care investment standard is to be measured, monitored and enforced; (c) circumstances in which the standard may be varied or disapplied. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be may unless a draft has been approved by resolution of both Houses of Parliament."
Clause 52, page 36, line 15, after “available” insert “for the purpose of delivering or improving patient health or social care”
Clause 52, page 36, line 18, leave out “health” and insert “direct patient”
Clause 52, page 36, line 19, at end insert- “(1A) The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers.”
Clause 52, page 36, line 28, leave out “including” and insert “solely for the purposes of”
Clause 52, page 36, leave out lines 38 to 40
Clause 52, page 37, line 3, at end insert- “(4A) In making the regulations the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure – (a) that adult social care providers and people drawing on care are represented in the design of shared care records, the single patient record, interoperability standards and the wider analogue-to-digital shift; (b) that a clear national route for relevant social care data is made available to authorised health and care professionals without requiring separate local integrations for every provider and area.”
Clause 52, page 37, line 9, at end insert – “(b) lay an assessment before Parliament on the readiness of the National Health Service to implement the single patient record. This assessment must include– (i) the interoperability, cybersecurity and operational resilience of relevant systems, (ii) compliance with data protection requirements, (iii) workforce and training requirements, (iv) the adequacy of hardware, connectivity and identity-management systems, (v) the estimated implementation and recurring costs, (vi) the capital funding to be made available to providers requiring upgrades, (vii) the measures to be taken to prevent digital exclusion, and (viii) a summary of any relevant independent technical, cybersecurity and data protection assurance obtained by the Secretary of State.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause- “NHS ownership of connection software (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is NHS ownership of any data connector software architecture used as part of the delivery of the NHS single patient record under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) or the NHS Federated Data Platform. (2) In this section, a data connector means an interface or connection between the NHS Federated Data Platform and any other health system.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause – “Single patient record: right to opt out (1) Regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) must enable a patient to opt out of – (a) information relating to them being made available through the system established under those regulations, or (b) such information being used for any purpose other than their direct care. (2) The regulations must enable a patient to opt out, or to withdraw an opt-out, at any time and free of charge – (a) through their GP practice, (b) electronically, or (c) by other means accessible to persons without internet access. (3) The regulations may not permit an opt-out to be overridden except where required by an order of a court or where necessary to protect the patient’s life.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause- “Single patient record: access logs and audit (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that a record is kept of each occasion on which patient information is accessed or otherwise processed by means of the system established under regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) (“the single patient record”), setting out– (a) the person or organisation by whom it was accessed or processed, (b) the date and time it was accessed or process, (c) the information accessed or processed, and (d) the purpose for which it was accessed or processed. (2) The Secretary of State must ensure that a patient is able to view, free of charge and by electronic means, the record kept under subsection (1) in relation to information about them. (3) The Secretary of State must publish, at least once every three months, a register of each disclosure of patient information obtained from or derived from the single patient record for purposes other than direct care, including research, setting out– (a) the recipient, (b) the purpose, (c) the legal basis for the disclosure, (d) whether the information disclosed was identifiable, pseudonymised or anonymised, and (e) the date of the disclosure and the period for which the information may be retained. (4) The Secretary of State must arrange for an independent audit, at least once in each financial year, of access to and processing of patient information by means of the single patient record, and must lay a report of each audit before Parliament.”
After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause- “Ownership of data connectors and prevention of supplier lock-in (1) Any data connector used in connection with the system established under regulations under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as inserted by section 52 of this Act) (“the single patient record”) or the NHS Federated Data Platform must- (a) be owned by the Secretary of State or an NHS body, including all intellectual property rights in it, and (b) conform to open standards published by the Secretary of State. (2) A contract for the provision of an information system which processes patient information on behalf of the Secretary of State or an NHS body may not– (a) confer on the supplier any intellectual property right in a data connector, or (b) restrict the transfer of patient information, or of any data connector, to another supplier. (3) A contract within subsection (2) must require the supplier, on the expiry or termination of the contract, to provide all patient information and associated metadata held under it in an open, machine-readable format within 90 days and at no additional cost. (4) Subsections (2) and (3) apply to any contract entered into or extended after the coming into force of this section. (5) In this section “data connector” means software, or an interface, which enables patient information to be transferred between the single patient record or the NHS Federated Data Platform and any other information system.”
Schedule 8, page 122, line 1, leave out paragraph 23 and insert- “23 For section 274A (Secretary of State’s guidance about NHS England data functions) substitute- “274A Secretary of State’s guidance in respect of their data functions (1) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the exercise of – (a) their relevant data functions, and (b) their other functions in connection with their relevant data functions. (2) Before publishing guidance under this section the Secretary of State must consult any other persons that the Secretary of State considers appropriate in relation to the guidance. (3) The Secretary of State must have regard to the guidance published under this section.””
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- “Privacy by design in NHS Federated Data Platform architecture (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is privacy by design as part of the delivery of the NHS Federated Data Platform architecture. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), privacy by design includes – (a) patient data anonymisation outside its usage by clinicians and within the National Data Integration Tenant; and (b) patient consent for the processing of personal information by NHS.”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- “Retendering of contract for the NHS Federated Data Platform The Secretary of State must, before February 2027, commence a competitive retendering for the contract to provide the NHS Federated Data Platform.”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- “NHS contracting for IT or data services (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a governance framework for the contracting of any IT or data services by any NHS organisation or by the Department of Health and Social Care for the purposes of the provision of health and social care services. (2) The framework established under subsection (1) must include the following provisions – (a) a party may not bid for any contract for services where such services have previously been provided by the party on a free trial basis; (b) the automatic extension of contracts is subject to audit by the National Audit Office; (c) contract terms must include provision for the department or NHS organisation to take ownership of any bespoke system built or developed by the contractor during the delivery of the contract; (d) the department or NHS organisation must, at the end of the contract period (or following any extensions) conduct a competitive retendering process; (e) where a retendering process takes place under subsection (2)(d), the contractor may not assist in the preparation of the contract specification. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause- “Retention of NHS number on following adoption (1) The Secretary of State must secure ensure that, where a person is the subject of an adoption order, the person’s NHS number is not changed by reason only of the making of that order. (2) The Secretary of State must secure ensure that a person’s health record is maintained as a single and continuous record under that NHS number after the making of an adoption order, to the same extent as it was maintained immediately before the order was made. (3) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to– (a) an adoption order made in public law proceedings, and (b) an adoption order made in private law proceedings, including an order made in favour of a step-parent or the partner of a parent. (4) In this section– “adoption order” has the meaning given by section 46 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; “health record” has the meaning given by section 205 of the Data Protection Act 2018; “NHS number” has the same meaning as “consistent identifier” in section 251A of the Health and Social Care Act 2012.”
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause – “National respite care scheme (1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a national respite care scheme. (2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for – (a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer under any enactment for the time being in force in England, an assessment by the local authority of whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities; (b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to – (i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing, (ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and (iii) participate in family and community life; (c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring. (3) Under subsection (2), “support” may include– (a) replacement care for the cared-for person; (b) respite services; (c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support. (4) The Secretary of State must provide sufficient support to local authorities to ensure the scheme under subsection (1) is delivered in every local authority. (5) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.”
After Clause 57, insert the following new Clause- “A right to a break for unpaid carers (1) The Secretary of State must establish a national scheme to provide breaks for unpaid carers. (2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for – (a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer under any enactment for the time being in force in England, an assessment by the local authority of whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities; (b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to – (i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing, (ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and (iii) participate in family and community life; (c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring. (3) Under subsection (2), “support” may include– (a) replacement care for the cared-for person; (b) respite services; (c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support. (4) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to provide financial assistance to local authorities for the purposes of delivering the scheme under subsection (1). (5) In this section “unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.”
Clause 64, page 46, line 35, leave out “a” and insert “an individual”
Clause 64, page 46, line 37, at end insert- “(8B) Provision made by virtue of subsection (8A) for the period to be determined by NICE or the Secretary of State may only apply – (a) in relation to a particular recommendation, and (b) where NICE or the Secretary of State (as the case may be) is satisfied that exceptional circumstances make it appropriate for a different period to that specified in subsection (8C) to apply to that recommendation. (8C) Except in the case of a determination in relation to a particular recommendation under subsection (8B), regulations under this section may not provide for the period within which a recommendation, or recommendations of a specified description, are to be complied with to exceed 90 days. (8D) Provision made by virtue of subsection (8A) for the period to be determined by NICE or the Secretary of State must require NICE or the Secretary of State, before making a determination in relation to a recommendation, to – (a) follow a process consistent with the procedures established by NICE under subsection (7)(a) for making that recommendation, (b) consult the manufacturer or supplier of any health technology to which the recommendation relates and such other persons, including organisations representing patients and clinicians, as NICE or the Secretary of State considers appropriate, and (c) publish the determination and the reasons for it.”
After Clause 71, insert the following new Clause- “Healthwatch funding (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, bring forward a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and Local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14. (2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding in line with 2026/2027 inflation rates.”
After Clause 78, insert the following new Clause- “Reclassification of injectable medicinal products (1) The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/1916) are amended as follows. (2) In regulation 62 (classification of UK marketing authorisation or parallel import licence), after paragraph (3), insert- “(3A) Paragraph (3)(d) does not prevent the licensing authority from considering or granting an application to vary a UK marketing authorisation so as to classify a medicinal product intended and authorised for self-administration by parenteral administration as a pharmacy medicine, where the licensing authority is satisfied that the product does not meet any of the criteria for prescription-only classification specified in paragraph (3)(a) to (c). (3B) Any application for reclassification under paragraph (3A) must be assessed individually by the licensing authority in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements.” (3) In Schedule 1 (further provisions for classification of medicinal products), in Part 1, paragraph 1(a), after “administration” insert “, unless the licensing authority is satisfied that the conditions in regulation 62(3A) are met”.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Fracture prevention services: implementation plan and reporting (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish and lay before Parliament an implementation plan for securing universal access in England by 2030 to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures. (2) The implementation plan must include – (a) a baseline assessment of current access to, and quality of, such services in each integrated care board area, (b) the minimum standards expected of such services, (c) measurable annual milestones towards universal access by 2030, including milestones relating to the identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, (d) the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to reduce unwarranted variation in access to, and quality of, such services, and (e) the outcomes by reference to which the effectiveness of implementation will be assessed, including the incidence of further fragility fractures and hip fractures. (3) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the publication of the implementation plan under subsection (1), and at intervals of no more than 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report setting out– (a) progress against the milestones in the implementation plan, (b) changes in access to services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures, and (c) the number and proportion of eligible people identified, assessed, treated and followed up through such services, including variation between integrated care board areas. (4) In this section, “services for the prevention of secondary fragility fractures” means services which provide for the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and follow-up of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, including services commonly known as fracture liaison services.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Review of Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review on progress made in increasing organ transplants since the passage of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Standards of care for NHS transplant patients’ services (1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish a review on the standards of NHS care for transplant patients. (2) The review under subsection (1) may cover the following matters – (a) analysis of the comparative performance, outcomes, waiting times and organ utilisation, including variation between transplant centres and international comparisons in relation to lung transplants; hearts transplants; kidney transplants liver transplants and other appropriate transplants; (b) analysis of workforce requirements and funding for 24/7 on call teams and centres providing transplant services; (c) such other matters as may be specified by the Secretary of State. (3) The review under subsection (1) must be taken in collaboration with patients, and families of patients together with practising clinicians in transplant services. (4) The review under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Human Tissue Authority: guidance and code of practice (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, by order under section 14(4) of the Human Tissue Act 2004, require the Authority to amend its guidance and codes of practice to ensure they– (a) reflect the passage of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019, and (b) adopt a best interests decision-making approach in relation to a potential donor. (2) Best interests decision-making approach in (1) is defined as a duty to seek out and consider a person’s wishes, feelings, beliefs, and values.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Report on the duty to cooperate (1) Within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on – (a) the operation of the duty to co-operate under section 72 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (co-operation between NHS bodies) and section 82 of that Act (co-operation between NHS bodies and local authorities), and (b) the impact of those duties on the integration of health and social care in England. (2) The report under subsection (1) must consider co-operation between– (a) relevant NHS bodies, and (b) relevant NHS bodies and local authorities in the delivery and commissioning of health and social care. (3) Within twelve months of the report under subsection (1) being laid, the Secretary of State must– (a) make provision to update guidance on the duty to co-operate, and (b) implement actions to strengthen integration in the report which the Secretary of State considers most appropriate.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Value-based procurement The Secretary of State must produce an annual report to Parliament on progress made in the adoption in England of value-based procurement of medical devices, consumables and services by the National Health Service and the social care sector.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “National wheelchairs standards (1) The Secretary of State must, within twelve months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a set of national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision to be implemented by integrated care boards in their commissioning of wheelchair services. (2) The national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision must be revised at least once every five years from the date of the previous publication. (3) The national standards for wheelchair commissioning and provision may cover the following areas as determined by the Secretary of State – (a) wheelchair pathways embracing assessment and provision of wheelchairs, including seating and associated accessories to support people’s mobility and postural needs; (b) the steps to be taken to engage with users of wheelchair services to ensure that lived experience is fully taken account; (c) steps to be taken to ensure that responsive roadside assistance is available to ensure that no user is left stranded when away from their place of residence; (d) the principles of quality to be used to develop local service specifications and to benchmark current commissioning and provision; (e) such other matters as may be specified by the Secretary of State.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “State of NHS dentistry report (1) The Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the state of NHS dentistry in England (“the State of Dentistry Report”) at least once every three years. (2) The State of Dentistry Report must include an assessment of – (a) access to NHS dental services and levels of unmet need, (b) the adequacy, distribution and sustainability of the NHS dental workforce, including general dental services, community dental services, hospital dental services, dental public health consultants and dental academia, (c) geographical inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes, (d) inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes between different socioeconomic groups and populations, including but not limited to people living in care homes and people experiencing homelessness, (e) demand and waiting times for dental treatment in community dental services and secondary care, (f) the extent to which inadequate access to NHS dental services contributes to avoidable pressure on other parts of the NHS, including primary medical care, urgent and emergency care, hospital services and the prescribing of medicines, and (g) the measures required to address any deficiencies or inequalities identified under paragraphs (a) to (f). (3) The report must include such indicators as the Secretary of State considers appropriate for assessing each of the matters set out in subsection (2), and those indicators must, wherever appropriate, be presented in a manner that enables comparisons to be made between different areas and populations and over time, including by reference to population size, full-time equivalent workforce and other relevant measures. (4) In preparing the report, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure that NHS dental services are sufficient to meet the current and projected need for dental care in England. (5) The Secretary of State must, within six months of publishing a State of Dentistry Report, set out the measures the Government intends to take in response to the findings of the report. (6) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for each State of Dentistry Report, and the Government’s response to it, to be debated in each House of Parliament. (7) The first State of Dentistry Report must be published within 24 months of the day on which this Act is passed.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “5A Health and care partners (1) After section 242A National Health Service Act 2006 insert– “242B Involvement of health and care partners (1) A service user has a right to personal contact, without physical barriers or time limits, including contact in private, and to be accompanied in person by at least one health and care partner. (2) Each health and care provider must make arrangements, as respects health or care services for which it is responsible, which secure that users of those services may be accompanied by at least one health and care partner during any period during which health or care services are provided to the service user or the service user is under the care or supervision of the health and care provider. (3) For the purposes of this section a “health and care partner” is a named person chosen by the service user who provides care and support whether unpaid or paid to the service user. (4) The following are “health and care providers” for the purposes of this section– (a) an NHS Trust or NHS Foundation Trust, (b) an integrated care board, (c) an English local authority, (d) a care home in England within the meaning of section 8 (3) Care Act 2014, (e) a person or company providing health care or care services registered with the Care Quality Commission, or (f) a person or company who provides care services to another person in return for payment.””
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause – “National Maternity Commissioner (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a National Maternity Commissioner, based within the Department of Health and Social Care. (2) The functions of the National Maternity Commissioner are to– (a) oversee NHS maternity services, (b) act as an independent voice for women and families, (c) ensure lessons are learned from identified failures and that the recommendations of maternity reviews are acted upon, (d) promote consistency, safety and accountability across NHS maternity services, and (e) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality and provision of maternity services in England. (3) The person appointed as Commissioner must– (a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role, (b) have first-hand experience of working in maternity services, so far as reasonably possible, and (c) not be a Member of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Maternity safety (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated “good” or “outstanding” by the Care Quality Commission. (2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the day on which this Act is passed, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes – (a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward, (b) one-to-one midwifery care, (c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service, (d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and (e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan. (3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Independence of appointments The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that operational decisions regarding the appointment, suspension or removal of – (a) chairs, directors and non-executive directors of NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, and (b) chief executives of integrated care boards, are made exclusively by persons employed in the Civil Service, upon strictly merit-based criteria.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Access to dental provision: dental deserts (1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a scheme to improve access to dental provision (“the scheme”). (2) The purpose of the scheme is to end dental deserts. (3) A “dental desert” is any local authority area with fewer than ten active dental practices per 100,000 people. (4) The scheme must make provision to support integrated care boards to – (a) guarantee emergency access to an NHS dentist, (b) provide free dental check ups for – (i) children, (ii) mothers within one year of having given birth, (iii) pregnant women, and (iv) low-income households, and (c) guarantee dental appointments for persons commencing– (i) surgery, (ii) chemotherapy, or (iii) transplant procedures. (5) The Secretary of State must, before publishing the scheme, issue a reformed dental contract. (6) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the establishment of the scheme, publish a dental workforce plan to support delivery of the scheme.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Cancer survival research programme (1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations made by statutory instrument establish a Cancer Survival Research Programme. (2) Regulations under this section must– (a) require government co-ordination and funding for research into cancers with a five-year survival rate below 20%, and (b) establish a fellowship programme for foreign academics in cancer research. (3) Any programme established under paragraph (2)(b) must make provision to waive visa fees for entry into the UK for participating academics. (4) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Corridor care (1) The Secretary of State must end the practice of corridor care in NHS hospitals within one year of the day on which this Act is passed. (2) If the requirement under subsection (1) is not met, the Secretary of State must commission an independent inquiry into the Government’s handling of corridor care. (3) The inquiry under subsection (2) must– (a) investigate the effectiveness of policies, funding and guidance relating to corridor care in the Department of Health and Social Care, (b) assess the impact on patient safety and staff morale of the continued practice of corridor care, and (c) recommend steps the Secretary of State should take to end the practice of corridor care. (4) The inquiry under subsection (1) should be supported by patient safety professionals from the Health Services Safety Investigations Body and the Care Quality Commission. (5) The inquiry must publish and lay before Parliament a final report within 6 months of the day on which the inquiry is established.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme (1) Section 4 of the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (2) for “(4)” substitute “(4A)” (3) After subsection (4) insert– “(4A) A person is within this subsection if they– (a) are a British citizen, (b) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or (c) have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Health strategy for people with learning disabilities (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health strategy for people with learning disabilities in England. (2) The Secretary of State must appoint a co-national director with a learning disability to lead on its development. (3) The strategy must be set out in, and aligned to, a new modern service framework, comprising– (a) an evidence-based description of the standards of care that should be available across the health service in England for people with learning disabilities of all ages, (b) the interventions and service models that must be implemented to improve outcomes for people with learning disabilities, including in particular (but not limited to) – (i) the steps to be taken to reduce early and avoidable mortality and close the gap in life expectancy for people with learning disabilities, (ii) the steps to be taken to reduce variation in the quality of and access to healthcare experienced by people with learning disabilities across integrated care board areas, (iii) the steps to be taken to improve the outcomes and experiences of people with learning disabilities, including their experiences of joined-up health and social care, being able to live healthier lives, and the support available to unpaid carers of people with learning disabilities, and (iv) the workforce requirements for delivering high-quality care, and the actions to be taken on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to learning disability healthcare, (c) measurable outcomes and milestones against which progress will be assessed, including the collection and publication of an annual dataset at national and local level covering the matters in paragraph (b), and (d) clear accountability for delivery at national and local level, including the appointment of one or more members of each integrated care board with responsibility for people with learning disabilities, and the publication of their details. (4) The strategy must be accompanied by a plan for research to develop the evidence base for improving the health and life expectancy of people with learning disabilities. (5) In preparing the strategy the Secretary of State must consult– (a) people with learning disabilities, their carers and supporters, and organisations representing the interests of people with learning disabilities, (b) clinicians from across the healthcare system and across all professional groups with expertise in supporting people with learning disabilities, (c) integrated care boards, (d) NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, and (e) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (6) The Secretary of State must lay the strategy before Parliament on the day on which it is published. (7) The Secretary of State must publish a report on national and local progress against the strategy at intervals of not more than 12 months following its initial publication.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Non-therapeutic male circumcision (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, make regulations made by statutory instrument relating to non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC). (2) Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provision for – (a) a requirement that NTMC may only be performed by a suitably qualified healthcare professional regulated by the Care Quality Commission, (b) the inclusion of NTMC as a regulated activity under the Health and Social Care Act 2008, (c) the creation of a statutory duty for Integrated Care Boards to produce annual data on prevalence and complications of NTMC, (d) a requirement that NTMC be included in the Single Patient Record, and (e) any other matter that the Secretary of State deems appropriate. (3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Annual report on immunisation programmes (1) The Secretary of State must, in respect of each financial year, prepare a report on the performance of the national immunisation programme. (2) The report must be laid before Parliament, and published, in a timely and comprehensive manner. (3) The report must cover the performance of – (a) routine immunisation programmes, (b) seasonal immunisation programmes, and (c) targeted immunisation programmes, forming part of the national immunisation programme. (4) The report must cover the performance of those programmes in relation to all cohorts eligible for immunisation under the national immunisation programme. (5) The report must use consistent measures of performance across the programmes reported on under this section. (6) The report must include information that enables the tracking of inequalities in immunisation coverage and uptake – (a) between different geographical areas in England, and (b) between different population groups. (7) In this section “national immunisation programme” means the programme of immunisation for England provided for in the exercise of functions of the Secretary of State, NHS England or an integrated care board (however the programme is described).”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Duty to promote public health All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Continuity of specified national diabetes programmes (1) The Secretary of State must secure that the programmes listed in subsection (2) continue to be provided, to at least the same extent as immediately before the abolition of NHS England. (2) The programmes referred to in subsection (1) are– (a) the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme; (b) the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme; (c) national provision for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for people with diabetes; (d) the national roll-out of hybrid closed loop (“artificial pancreas”) technology for people with type 1 diabetes; (e) the National Diabetes Audit Programme, including the National Diabetes Footcare Audit and the National Diabetes Inpatient Safety Audit; (f) any other programme specified for the purposes of this section in regulations made by statutory instrument made by the Secretary of State. (3) Before making a scheme under section 2 for the transfer of property, rights or liabilities relating to a programme listed in subsection (2) the Secretary of State must publish a statement explaining how continuity of that programme is to be maintained. (4) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force, and at least once every subsequent period of 12 months, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on the provision of the programmes listed in subsection (2), including information on patient access, waiting times and outcomes. (5) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (2)(f) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause- “Report on effect of abolition of NHS England on diabetes services (1) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 1 comes into force, and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter for the following 3 years, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report assessing the effect of the abolition of NHS England on the planning, funding and delivery of diabetes prevention, treatment and care services in England. (2) A report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of – (a) any change in funding allocated to diabetes prevention, treatment and care programmes; (b) any change to the operation or continuation of national clinical audits relating to diabetes; (c) the impact on patient access to diabetes technology, including glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems; (d) the impact on workforce capacity in specialist diabetes services.”
After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— “Report on effect of abolition of NHS England on diabetes services (1) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 1 comes into force, and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter for the following 3 years, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report assessing the effect of the abolition of NHS England on the planning, funding and delivery of diabetes prevention, treatment and care services in England. (2) A report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of – (a) any change in funding allocated to diabetes prevention, treatment and care programmes; (b) any change to the operation or continuation of national clinical audits relating to diabetes; (c) the impact on patient access to diabetes technology, including glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems; (d) the impact on workforce capacity in specialist diabetes services.”
None NC124
Steff Aquarone (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Benjamin Court, Cromer: NHS use
(1) Within three months of the passage of this Act, Secretary of State make provision for Benjamin Court, Cromer to be brought back in to use by an NHS service.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to make provision for Benjamin Court, Cromer to be brought back in to use by an NHS service.
Opposition Amendment NC126
Clive Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Trade)To move the following Clause—
“Royal Berkshire Hospital: construction work
(1) The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that construction on the Royal Berkshire Hospital is completed by 2040.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure construction work on the Royal Berkshire Hospital is completed by 2040 at the latest.
Opposition Amendment NC128
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“St Helier Hospital: construction work
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that construction on St Helier Hospital is completed by 2030.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure construction work on St Helier Hospital is completed by 2030.
None NC131
Sam Carling (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Activities of religious groups in medical settings
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passage of this Act, make regulations concerning the activities of religious groups in medical settings in England.
(2) Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) clinical oversight of training provided by representatives of religious groups to healthcare professionals and students on the treatment of patients who hold religious beliefs that may influence their choice of treatment;
(b) ensuring that the contacting of any religious group on behalf of a patient, or for advice on care, is made only at the request of the patient;
(c) requiring opportunities for patients to indicate final treatment preference in the absence of religious representatives, and ensuring religious representatives cannot later verify a patient’s final treatment choice; and
(d) any other matter that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.
(3) Regulations made under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations governing the activities of religious groups in medical settings in England, to prevent medical coercion.
None NC132
Sam Carling (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Non-therapeutic male circumcision
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passage of this Act, make regulations relating to non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC).
(2) Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) a requirement that NTMC may only be performed by a suitably qualified healthcare professional and must be inspected by the Care Quality Commission;
(b) the inclusion of NTMC as a regulated activity under the Health and Social Care Act 2008;
(c) the creation of a statutory duty for integrated care boards to produce annual data on prevalence and complications of NTMC;
(d) a requirement that NTMC be included in the Single Patient Record; and
(e) any other matter that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.
(3) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to introduce regulation of non-therapeutic male circumcision, following several prevention of future death reports issued by coroners as a result of deaths arising from this procedure.
None 82
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 62, page 45, line 37, at end insert—
“(8B) Provision under (8A) about the period within which a recommendation is to be complied with must—
(a) only apply to individual recommendations in the case of exceptional circumstances,
(b) follow a process aligned with NICE's health technology evaluation procedures,
(c) be subject to engagement from industry stakeholders.”
None 78
Tessa Munt (LD)Schedule 11, page 137, line 2, at end insert—
“(2A) In making arrangements under subsection (2), an integrated care board must have regard to the need to facilitate participation by persons who may experience barriers to engagement, including persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions.”
This amendment would require an integrated care board, in making arrangements for gathering patient views, to have regard to the need to facilitate participation by persons who may experience barriers to engagement, including persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions.
Opposition Amendment NC141
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Suspension of Advice and Guidance pending HSSIB report and mitigation plan
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that the operation and further rollout of Advice and Guidance services (including any targets, incentives, pathways or contractual requirements that treat Advice and Guidance as a prerequisite or preferred alternative to direct referral) are suspended until the conditions in subsection (2) are met.
(2) The conditions are that—
(a) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (or, if its functions have already been transferred under section 63 of this Act, the Care Quality Commission exercising those functions) has laid its final report on Advice and Guidance services before Parliament, and
(b) the Secretary of State has published a written mitigation plan addressing the patient safety risks, harms and recommendations identified in that report (including any linked to patient deaths, near misses, treatment delays, resource and capacity gaps, workforce training, digital systems and incident reporting).”
Opposition Amendment NC142
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Puberty blockers
(1) Within three months of the passage of this Act the Secretary of State must make regulations which ensure that puberty blockers may not be prescribed, dispensed or supplied to persons under 18 years of age for the purposes of treatment related to gender dysphoria, gender incongruence or a combination of both, in the United Kingdom.
(2) Regulations under this section must ensure that such drugs cannot be given out or used as part of clinical trials for the treatment of gender dysphoria, gender incongruence or a combination of both, unless that trial has specifically been approved by a resolution of both Houses of Parliament.
(3) For the purposes of this section, puberty blockers means—
(a) a “gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (“GnRH”) analogue” which means a medicinal product that consists of or contains buserelin, gonadorelin, goserelin, leuprorelin acetate, nafarelin or triptorelin, and
(b) any other drug which has the effect of suppressing or delaying puberty that the Secretary of State may by regulation appoint.”
This new clause would create a requirement for the Secretary of State to make regulations which prevent puberty blockers from being prescribed to persons under 18 years of age for the purposes of treatment related to gender incongruence, or being given in clinical trials related to gender incongruence unless specifically approved by Parliament.
Opposition Amendment NC143
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Single sex facilities
(1) The Secretary of State is required to ensure that there are single sex—
(a) changing rooms for NHS staff,
(b) toilets and washing facilities for NHS staff,
(c) wards for NHS patients, and
(d) toilets and washing facilities for NHS patients.
(2) The Secretary of State may make exemptions to the duty in subsection (1)(c) and (1)(d) where necessary for—
(a) children,
(b) intensive care units,
(c) critical care, and
(d) specialist high observation areas such as resuscitation in Accident and Emergency and the initial recovery area in theatres.”
This new clause creates a requirement for the Secretary of State to ensure certain single sex facilities are made available for NHS staff and patients. It provides exemptions in certain circumstances.
Opposition Amendment NC146
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Fracture liaison services: delivery plan and annual reporting
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 90 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a delivery plan for securing universal provision of fracture liaison services across England by 2030.
(2) The plan under subsection (1) must include—
(a) a baseline assessment of current access to, and quality of, fracture liaison services in each integrated care board area, distinguishing clearly between services established before and after July 2024;
(b) annual milestones for the number of patients identified, assessed and treated through fracture liaison services, sufficient to reach the level required for universal coverage;
(c) the specific steps the Secretary of State will take to support integrated care boards to commission and sustain high-quality fracture liaison services, including any use of directions, guidance, financial incentives, capital funding or other mechanisms;
(d) workforce, diagnostic (including DEXA capacity), digital and data requirements, with associated funding assumptions;
(e) arrangements for independent monitoring and public reporting of progress against the milestones; and
(f) an estimate of the expected reduction in fragility fractures, hip fractures, associated deaths and NHS bed days, drawing on available evidence including that published by the Royal Osteoporosis Society.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of publishing the plan under subsection (1) and every 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report setting out—
(a) progress against each annual milestone;
(b) the number of new fracture liaison services established and the number of patients identified in the preceding year;
(c) any revision to the milestones or timetable, with the reasons for any such revision; and
(d) action being taken to address any shortfall.
(4) In this section “fracture liaison service” means a service for the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and ongoing monitoring of people who have sustained a fragility fracture, for the purpose of reducing their risk of further fractures.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a plan to roll out fracture liaison services across England and publish reports of progress.
Opposition Amendment NC147
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Plan to manage acquired brain injury
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a plan for the management of acquired brain injury across England.
(2) A plan under subsection (1) must include but shall not be limited to—
(a) proposed government actions to prevent acquired brain injuries;
(b) proposed government actions to improve acute treatment for acquired brain injuries;
(c) a statement of priorities regarding the Secretary of State’s approach for rehabilitation and long-term support for persons with acquired brain injuries across public services delivered by—
(i) the Department of Health and Social Care,
(ii) the Department for Education, and
(iii) the Ministry of Justice;
(d) proposals for data sharing between government departments, health care, and rehabilitation providers to improve patient—
(i) identification,
(ii) care, and
(iii) support;
(e) a commitment to providing 95% of people with complex needs with a personalised care plan by 2027;
(f) commitments for research into acquired brain injuries in sport;
(g) any proposed use of directions, guidance, financial assistance, incentives or other mechanisms to secure delivery of the plan’s objectives;
(h) workforce, diagnostic, digital and data requirements for implementation of the plan; and
(i) arrangements for monitoring, publishing and reporting progress against the plan.
(3) The plan under subsection (1) must be laid by the Secretary of State before both Houses of Parliament.
(4) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of publishing a plan under subsection (1), and every 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report on progress made against the proposals and commitments in the plan.”
This new clause would require the Government to publish their action plan to manage acquired brain injury within 30 days of the passing of this Act.
Opposition Amendment NC148
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Radiotherapy cancer treatment services
(1) The Secretary of State must publish and maintain a national framework for improving access to radiotherapy services in England.
(2) The framework must include nationally agreed metrics against which integrated care boards must measure and report their investment in, and delivery of, radiotherapy services.
(3) The metrics must include provisions relating to—
(a) waiting times for radiotherapy, including time to definitive treatment;
(b) patient travel times to radiotherapy services, including defining an appropriate recommended travel time;
(c) the number of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy and the quality of such radiotherapy;
(d) the age, capability and replacement needs of radiotherapy equipment, including the proportion of linear accelerators that are more than 10 years old or otherwise beyond the recommended replacement age;
(e) access to modern radiotherapy techniques and technologies;
(f) radiotherapy capacity against population need and the projected increase in number of cancer patients;
(g) variation in access to radiotherapy services between integrated care board areas;
(h) provision of sustainable, flexible workforce that is equipped to harness advances in radiotherapy for patient benefit; and
(i) investment in radiotherapy services and the extent to which such investment reflects clinical need.
(4) Each integrated care board must publish an annual report on its performance against the metrics in the framework.
(5) Before publishing or revising the framework, the Secretary of State must consult persons with clinical, technical, operational and patient expertise in radiotherapy which the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(6) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each financial year, a report on the implementation of the framework.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish and maintain a national framework for improving access to radiotherapy services in England.
Opposition Amendment NC149
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Modern Service Framework for Respiratory Disease – prioritisation and reporting
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must—
(a) publish a statement setting out the criteria and process by which the National Quality Board will assess proposals for future Modern Service Frameworks (including respiratory disease), and
(b) lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on the prioritisation of respiratory disease for a Modern Service Framework.
(2) The report under subsection (1)(b) must include—
(a) an assessment of the current burden of respiratory disease in England including—
(i) emergency admissions,
(ii) variation by integrated care board area,
(iii) outcomes;
(b) the evidence of potential for rapid and significant improvements in quality of care and productivity that a respiratory Modern Service Framework could deliver;
(c) the status of existing work on respiratory pathways including for—
(i) pulmonary fibrosis,
(ii) pulmonary rehabilitation,
(iii) diagnostics,
(iv) early detection and lung cancer screening,
(v) supported self-management,
(vi) access to medicines;
(d) the expected timetable for any decision by the National Quality Board on whether to prioritise a respiratory Modern Service Framework; and
(e) interim actions the Secretary of State and NHS England are taking to reduce unwarranted variation and emergency admissions attributable to respiratory disease pending any such decision.
(3) If the National Quality Board decides not to prioritise a respiratory Modern Service Framework within 18 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must, within three months of that decision, publish and lay before Parliament an alternative national plan for improving respiratory care that addresses the matters set out in subsection (2)(a) to (c) and (e).
(4) The Secretary of State must publish an updated report under subsection (1)(b), or a progress report against any respiratory Modern Service Framework or alternative plan, at intervals of not more than three years.
(5) In preparing any report or plan under this section the Secretary of State must consult clinicians with expertise in respiratory medicine, organisations representing people with respiratory disease, integrated care boards, and NHS providers of respiratory services.”
Opposition Amendment NC150
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Modern Service Framework for Musculoskeletal Care – prioritisation and reporting
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must—
(a) publish a statement setting out the criteria and process by which the National Quality Board will assess proposals for future Modern Service Frameworks (including musculoskeletal conditions), and
(b) lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on the prioritisation of musculoskeletal care for a Modern Service Framework.
(2) The report under subsection (1)(b) must include—
(a) an assessment of the current burden of musculoskeletal conditions in England including—
(i) waiting times,
(ii) emergency admissions or unplanned care,
(iii) variation by integrated care board area,
(iv) impact on work and economic inactivity,
(v) outcomes,
(b) the evidence of potential for rapid and significant improvements in quality of care and productivity that a musculoskeletal Modern Service Framework could deliver;
(c) the status of existing national programmes including—
(i) the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) MSK Community Delivery Programme;
(ii) any related elective recovery or neighbourhood health initiatives,
(d) the expected timetable for any decision by the National Quality Board on whether to prioritise a musculoskeletal Modern Service Framework; and
(e) interim actions the Secretary of State and NHS England are taking to reduce unwarranted variation, waiting times and the impact of musculoskeletal conditions on patients and the wider economy pending any such decision.
(3) If the National Quality Board decides not to prioritise a musculoskeletal Modern Service Framework within 18 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must, within three months of that decision, publish and lay before Parliament an alternative national plan for improving musculoskeletal care that addresses the matters set out in subsection (2)(a) to (c) and (e).
(4) The Secretary of State must publish an updated report under subsection (1)(b), or a progress report against any musculoskeletal Modern Service Framework or alternative plan, at intervals of not more than three years.
(5) In preparing any report or plan under this section the Secretary of State must consult clinicians with expertise in musculoskeletal medicine and related professions, organisations representing people with musculoskeletal conditions, integrated care boards, and NHS providers of musculoskeletal services.”
Opposition Amendment NC151
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Patient safety recommendations: Government response
(1) This section applies where the Secretary of State commissions a review or a report into a patient safety issue.
(2) The Secretary of State must—
(a) decide within six months whether they are going to implement each recommendation of the review;
(b) publish a response to each recommendation with a statement indicating whether each recommendation will be implemented; and
(c) publish a timeline for implementation of recommendations which will be implemented.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to respond to patient safety recommendations.
Opposition Amendment NC56
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“National Respite Care Scheme
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must establish a National Respite Care Scheme.
(2) The scheme under subsection (1) must make provision for—
(a) where a local authority carries out an assessment of the needs of an unpaid carer, under any enactment for the time being in force in England, it must assess whether the unpaid carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring responsibilities,
(b) unpaid carers to receive support to take breaks from their caring responsibilities to—
(i) maintain their physical and mental health and emotional wellbeing,
(ii) participate in work, education, training or recreation, and
(iii) participate in family and community life,
(c) a carer to receive appropriate support if a local authority carrying out an assessment under subsection (2)(a) determines that a carer is unable to take sufficient breaks from caring.
(3) Under subsection (2), “support” may include—
(a) replacement care for the cared-for person;
(b) respite services;
(c) any other steps a local authority considers appropriate as support.
(4) The Secretary of State must provide sufficient support to local authorities to ensure the scheme under subsection (1) is delivered in every local authority.
(5) For the purposes of this section—
“unpaid carer” means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work;
“parent carer” has the same meaning as in section 17ZD of the Children Act 1989;
“young carer” has the same meaning as in section 96 of the Children and Families Act 2014.”
None NC110
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Rural access to child and adolescent mental health services
(1) Each integrated care board must make arrangements to ensure that children and young people in rural areas have reasonable access to child and adolescent mental health services.
(2) In exercising its functions under subsection (1), an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) travel distances and travel times;
(b) the availability of public transport;
(c) the availability of locally accessible community facilities; and
(d) the particular needs of children and young people who may face barriers to travelling to a centralised service.
(3) The Secretary of State must provide appropriate support to integrated care boards and local authorities to develop community-based child and adolescent mental health services in rural areas.
(4) An integrated care board and a local authority may make arrangements for the use or repurposing of vacant or underused public buildings for the provision of child and adolescent mental health services.”
This new clause would improve access to CAMHS in rural areas by supporting locally delivered services and enabling vacant or underused public buildings to be repurposed for community mental health provision.
None NC111
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Child and adolescent mental health workforce and service capacity
(1) Each integrated care board must assess whether child and adolescent mental health services in its area have sufficient staffing and clinical capacity to meet the needs of children and young people.
(2) Where an assessment under subsection (1) identifies a significant shortfall, the integrated care board must prepare and implement a plan to address that shortfall.
(3) The plan must include measures to support the recruitment and retention of suitably qualified staff and, where clinically appropriate, the provision of specialist services including trauma assessment, dialectical behaviour therapy and art therapy.
(4) In preparing the plan, an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) the number of children and young people receiving CAMHS services;
(b) waiting times for assessment and treatment;
(c) the number and complexity of cases managed by individual staff members; and
(d) the availability of specialist clinical services.”
This new clause would require integrated care boards to assess and address staffing and service capacity in CAMHS, including access to appropriate specialist services.
None NC112
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review of child and adolescent mental health services in rural areas
(1) The Secretary of State must conduct, or arrange for the conduct of, reviews of the provision of child and adolescent mental health services in rural areas in England.
(2) Any review must consider—
(a) waiting times for assessment and treatment;
(b) access to interim support following referral;
(c) travel distances and access to public transport;
(d) staffing and specialist service capacity;
(e) the availability of community-based provision; and
(f) the use of vacant or underused public buildings for the delivery of services.
(3) A review must identify areas where the provision of child and adolescent mental health services is insufficient to meet local need.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish the findings of any review and an action plan setting out measures to address any significant deficiencies identified.
(5) The first review under this section must be completed within 12 months of the passing of this Act and subsequent reviews must be completed at intervals of not more than five years.”
This new clause would require a national review of CAMHS provision in rural areas, including access, waiting times, workforce capacity and the availability of community-based services.
Opposition Amendment NC113
Tim Farron (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Radiotherapy services: access and accountability
(1) The Secretary of State must publish and maintain a national framework for improving access to radiotherapy services in England.
(2) The framework must set out nationally agreed metrics against which integrated care boards must measure and report their delivery of, and investment in, radiotherapy services.
(3) The metrics must include, but are not limited to, metrics relating to—
(a) waiting times for radiotherapy;
(b) access to radiotherapy services, including variation in radiotherapy treatment rates between integrated care board areas;
(c) the age, capability and replacement needs of radiotherapy equipment;
(d) radiotherapy capacity against assessed population need; and
(e) workforce capacity.
(4) Each integrated care board must publish an annual report on its performance against the metrics in the framework.
(5) Before publishing or revising the framework, the Secretary of State must consult persons with clinical, technical, operational and patient expertise in radiotherapy services.
(6) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, at least once in each financial year, a report on the implementation of the framework and any steps proposed to address underperformance or unwarranted variation.
(7) In this section, “radiotherapy services” means services involving the use of ionising radiation for the treatment of cancer.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a national framework for improving access to radiotherapy services. Integrated Care Boards would be required to report annually against national metrics on waiting times, access, equipment, capacity, workforce, investment and variation.
Opposition Amendment NC114
Tim Farron (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Radiotherapy services: access and waiting times
(1) Within six months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must conduct and publish a review of access to radiotherapy services and waiting times for radiotherapy in England.
(2) The review must include an assessment of—
(a) variation in access to radiotherapy services between integrated care board areas;
(b) waiting times for radiotherapy services, including where radiotherapy is the first, second or subsequent cancer treatment received by a patient; and
(c) the extent to which capacity, equipment, workforce or investment constraints are affecting access to radiotherapy services or waiting times for radiotherapy.
(3) In conducting the review, the Secretary of State must consult persons with clinical, technical, operational and patient expertise in radiotherapy services.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay the review before Parliament and set out any steps proposed to address identified gaps in access to radiotherapy services or waiting times for radiotherapy.
(5) In this section, “radiotherapy services” means services involving the use of ionising radiation for the treatment of cancer.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to review access to radiotherapy services and radiotherapy waiting times. The review would examine variation between ICB areas, delays where radiotherapy is a first or subsequent treatment, and the capacity constraints affecting patient access.
Opposition Amendment NC116
Anna Sabine (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Access to medicinal cannabis for children: review and clinical trials
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a review on access to medicinal cannabis for children on the NHS.
(2) The review under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) variation between integrated care boards in the referral and prescribing of medicinal cannabis to children;
(b) the barriers preventing children from accessing medicinal cannabis through the NHS, including the number of patients who access private prescriptions as a result;
(c) the current evidence base for the clinical effectiveness of medicinal cannabis for children; and
(d) options for expanding that evidence base through clinical trials.
(3) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to support and facilitate clinical trials into the use of medicinal cannabis for children, with the aim of establishing a clearer evidence base to inform NHS prescribing guidance.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the review before both Houses.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to review inconsistencies in NHS access to medicinal cannabis for children, including the extent to which patients are forced to rely on private prescriptions, and would place a duty on the Secretary of State to support clinical trials to strengthen the evidence base for prescribing.
Opposition Amendment NC117
Anna Sabine (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Access to speech and language therapy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy for improving access to NHS speech and language therapy services in England.
(2) The strategy under subsection (1) must include—
(a) an assessment of waiting times for speech and language therapy across integrated care boards;
(b) an assessment of variation in access to speech and language therapy between different areas of England;
(c) an assessment of the speech and language therapy workforce, including current vacancy rates and future workforce need; and
(d) proposals to reduce waiting times and geographical variation in access.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the strategy before Parliament.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish a further report reviewing progress against the strategy within eighteen months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to address waiting times and geographical inequality in access to NHS speech and language therapy, and to report on progress against that strategy.
None NC125
Tom Morrison (LD) - Liberal Democrat Deputy Chief WhipTo move the following Clause—
“Stepping Hill Hospital: Repairs
(1) The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that repair works on Stepping Hill Hospital are completed by 2030.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of state to ensure repair work on Stepping Hill hospital is completed by 2030.
Opposition Amendment NC133
David Chadwick (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Wales)To move the following Clause- "England and Wales cross-border healthcare: statement of values and principles (1) The Secretary of State and each integrated care board must, in exercising functions relating to the provision or commissioning of health services to persons residing in an area of England or Wales close to the border between England and Wales, have regard to the 2018 England / Wales Cross-border Healthcare Services: Statement of Values and Principles. (2) For the purposes of this section, “the England / Wales Cross-border Healthcare Services: Statement of Values and Principles” means the statement published by NHS England and the Welsh Ministers on 6 November 2018, or a revised statement designated by regulations under subsection (3). (3) The Secretary of State may by regulations designate a revised version of the Statement for the purposes of this section. (4) Before making regulations under subsection (3), the Secretary of State must consult- (a) the Welsh Ministers; (b) each integrated care board whose area is close to the border between England and Wales; (c) each Local Health Board whose area is close to the border between England and Wales; and (d) such organisations representing patients affected by cross-border healthcare arrangements as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (5) Regulations under subsection (3) are to be made by statutory instrument. (6) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (3) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”
Opposition Amendment NC134
David Chadwick (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Wales)To move the following Clause- "England and Wales cross-border healthcare arrangements (1) The Secretary of State must, within 18 months of the passing of this Act, seek to agree with the Welsh Ministers a revised England / Wales Cross-border Healthcare Services: Statement of Values and Principles. (2) In preparing the revised Statement under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must consider- (a) the effectiveness of existing arrangements for the provision and commissioning of cross-border health care services; (b) the interests of patients who live in England or Wales and receive, or may receive, health services on the other side of the border; (c) arrangements for the commissioning and funding of cross-border healthcare services; (d) arrangements for resolving disputes between relevant bodies in England and Wales; and (e) the appropriate means of placing the principles governing England and Wales cross-border health care services on a statutory footing. (3) The Secretary of State must, within two years of the passing of this Act- (a) publish the revised Statement agreed under subsection (1), or, where no revised Statement has been agreed, publish a report setting out the steps taken to seek such agreement and the reasons why agreement has not been reached; (b) lay the revised Statement or report before Parliament; and (c) lay before Parliament proposals for placing the principles governing England and Wales cross-border healthcare services on a statutory footing."
None NC135
Chris Coghlan (LD)To move the following Clause- "Reporting on mortality inequalities for autistic people and people with learning disabilities (1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a report on the mortality inequalities experienced by autistic people and people with a learning disability. (2) The report under subsection (1) must specify targets for reducing mortality inequalities between people without a learning disability and autistic people and people with any learning disability. (3) Within 3 months of the publication of the report under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must make regulations which require ICBs to publish an annual report which includes- (a) mortality rates for- (i) autistic people, (ii) people with any learning disability, (iii) people without a learning disability. (b) identification of any areas in which data collection on mortality inequalities experienced by autistic people and people with learning disabilities is inadequate, (c) a review of the reasons for any inequalities in mortality rates, (d) a plan for reducing inequalities in mortality rates between people without a learning disability and autistic people and people with any learning disability. (4) Regulations under subsection (3) must make provision for the annual reports to continue for as long as mortality inequalities between people without a learning disability and autistic people and people with any learning disability exist. (5) The Secretary of State must publish an annual report summarising the information in the ICB reports under subsection (3), identifying national trends in- (a) mortality rates, (b) reasons for inequalities in mortality rates, (c) potential actions to reduce inequalities in mortality rates."
Opposition Amendment NC136
Ben Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Shadow Attorney GeneralTo move the following Clause- "North Cornwall: Dental appointments (1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in North Cornwall. (2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means— (a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and (b) improved access to routine dental appointments. (3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
Opposition Amendment NC137
Clive Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Trade)To move the following Clause- "Cancer outcomes (1) The National Health Service Act 2006 is amended as follows. (2) After section 1GA insert— "1GB Cancer outcomes In exercising functions relating to the health service, the Secretary of State must treat objectives relating to cancer outcomes as having priority over any other objectives relating specifically to cancer.”"
Opposition Amendment NC118
Sarah Dyke (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Rural Affairs)To move the following Clause— "Glastonbury and Somerton: Dental appointments (1) Within one year of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must make provision to ensure adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Glastonbury and Somerton is guaranteed. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), adequate provision means universal access to- (a) urgent dental appointments, and (b) routine dental appointments. (3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in Glastonbury and Somerton.”
Opposition Amendment NC119
Sarah Dyke (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Rural Affairs)To move the following Clause— "Report into digital health services in rural and coastal areas (1) The Secretary of State must publish a report on the equality of access to and quality of digital health services in rural and coastal areas within 12 months of the passing of this Act. (2) The report under subsection (1) Secretary of State must include an action plan to ensure rural and coastal practices are able to provide remote consultations and electronic prescription services.”
Opposition Amendment NC120
Sarah Dyke (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Rural Affairs)To move the following Clause— "Farmer friendly accredited general practice scheme (1) The Secretary of State must create a farmer friendly accredited general practice scheme to recognise and resource GP practices that proactively reach farming communities. (2) The scheme under subsection (1) should be modelled on Royal College of GPs' Veteran Friendly Accreditation scheme. (3) The Secretary of State must instruct the CQC to develop clear guidance for the farmer friendly accredited general practice scheme which supports delivery of care in non-clinical community settings with proportionate hygiene protocols that reflect the setting."
None NC121
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause— "Continuity of specified national diabetes programmes (1) The Secretary of State must secure that the programmes listed in subsection (2) continue to be provided, to at least the same extent as immediately before the abolition of NHS England. (2) The programmes referred to in subsection (1) are— (a) the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme; (b) the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme; (c) national provision for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for people with diabetes; (d) the national roll-out of hybrid closed loop ("artificial pancreas") technology for people with type 1 diabetes; (e) the National Diabetes Audit programme, including the National Diabetes Footcare Audit and the National Diabetes Inpatient Safety Audit; (f) any other programme specified for the purposes of this section in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (3) Before making a scheme under section 2 for the transfer of property, rights or liabilities relating to a programme listed in subsection (2) the Secretary of State must publish a statement explaining how continuity of that programme is to be maintained. (4) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force, and at least once every subsequent period of 12 months, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on the provision of the programmes listed in subsection (2), including information on patient access, waiting times and outcomes. (5) Regulations under subsection (2)(f) are subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament."
None NC122
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause— "Report on effect of abolition of NHS England on diabetes services (1) Before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which section 1 comes into force, and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter for the following 3 years, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report assessing the effect of the abolition of NHS England on the planning, funding and delivery of diabetes prevention, treatment and care services in England. (2) A report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of— (a) any change in funding allocated to diabetes prevention, treatment and care programmes; (b) any change to the operation or continuation of national clinical audits relating to diabetes; (c) the impact on patient access to diabetes technology, including glucose monitoring and insulin delivery systems; (d) the impact on workforce capacity in specialist diabetes services."
Opposition Amendment NC127
Clive Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Trade)To move the following Clause— “Arborfield GP Surgery: construction work (1) The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that construction on Arborfield GP Surgery is completed by the end of 2029. (2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
Opposition Amendment NC129
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— "Epsom and Ewell: Dental appointments (1) Within one of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must make provision to ensure adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Epsom and Ewell. (2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means universal access to— (a) urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and (b) routine dental appointments. (3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in Epsom and Ewell.”
Opposition Amendment NC130
Al Pinkerton (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Europe)To move the following Clause— "Surrey Heath Constituency: Dental appointments (1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Surrey Heath constituency. (2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means— (a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and (b) improved access to routine dental appointments. (3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
None 80
Tom Gordon (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert— "(c) reduce inequalities in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, including variation in access to structured education, glucose monitoring technology and insulin pump therapy."
None 81
Tom Gordon (LD)Clause 6, page 4, line 11, at end insert— "(1A) The duty in subsection (1) includes, in particular, promoting innovation in the prevention, diagnosis andtreatment of diabetes, including through the adoption of glucose monitoring and automated insulin deliverytechnologies."
None 76
Tessa Munt (LD)Clause 15, page 11, line 33, at end insert- "(4A) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to ensure that arrangements under subsection (2) are accessible and inclusive, having particular regard to the needs of persons with disabilities and persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions.”
None 79
Edward Morello (LD)Clause 16, page 11, line 10, at end insert— "(3) Regulations under this section must, in relation to children and young people referred to child and adolescent mental health services, require integrated care boards to make arrangements for appropriate interim support during any period between referral and the commencement of substantive treatment or assessment. (4) The arrangements under subsection (3) may include- (a) regular appointments or check-ups with a GP or other primary care professional; (b) support from a family support worker; (c) regular wellbeing checks or support provided through a school, including by a school nurse or other appropriate professional; and (d) access to appropriate peer support, youth clubs or other community-based support. (5) The purpose of arrangements under subsection (3) is to ensure that a child or young person does not remain without appropriate support solely because they are awaiting the commencement of substantive assessment or treatment.”
None 83
Jen Craft (Lab)Clause 21, page 16, line 6, at end insert— “(5) The constitution of an integrated care board must provide for the appointment of one or more members of the board with explicit responsibility for- (a) people with learning disabilities; (b) autistic people; (c) people with Down syndrome; and (d) children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities. (6) The integrated care board must publish details of the member or members appointed under sub-paragraph (5)."
None 77
Tessa Munt (LD)Clause 24, page 17, line 35, at end insert “A neighbourhood health plan must include consideration of how health services will meet the needs of persons with long-term, complex or fluctuating health conditions”
Opposition Amendment 17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert- "(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on Primary Care services. (2B) The increase in spending set out in subsection (2B) must be in line with the change in level of their total programme funding."
Opposition Amendment 18
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert "and (2A) and (2B)"
Government Amendment NC94
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Medical devices regulation: Great Britain
At the beginning of Part 4 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 insert—
“Chapter A1
Medical devices regulations (Great Britain)
14A Licensing of medical devices
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations (“medical devices regulations”)—
(a) prohibit a person from carrying out the following activities in the course of business otherwise than in accordance with a product licence—
(i) supplying medical devices;
(ii) advertising medical devices;
(b) prohibit a person from carrying out the following activities in the course of business otherwise than in accordance with a personal licence—
(i) manufacturing medical devices;
(ii) importing medical devices;
(iii) supplying medical devices by way of wholesale dealing;
(c) prohibit a person from carrying out a clinical investigation in relation to a medical device otherwise than in accordance with a personal licence.
(2) In subsection (1)(b)(ii) the reference to importing medical devices is to—
(a) importing medical devices into the United Kingdom as a result of their entry into Great Britain, or
(b) removing medical devices to Great Britain from Northern Ireland.
(3) The Secretary of State’s overarching objective in making medical devices regulations, and in exercising any functions under them, is to safeguard public health.
(4) In considering whether the exercise of a function would contribute to that objective, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the safety of medical devices;
(b) the availability of medical devices;
(c) the likelihood of the United Kingdom being seen as a favourable place in which to—
(i) carry out research relating to medical devices,
(ii) develop medical devices, or
(iii) manufacture or supply medical devices.
(5) In this Chapter—
“personal licence” means a licence, issued by the Secretary of State, authorising the licence holder to carry out an activity mentioned in subsection (1)(b) or (c) in relation to a medical device of a description specified in the licence;
“product licence” means a licence, issued by the Secretary of State, authorising the supply or advertising of a medical device of a description specified in the licence (whether by the licence holder or otherwise).
(6) Nothing in the later provisions of this Chapter limits the breadth of the power conferred by subsection (1).
14B Grant of licences
(1) Medical devices regulations may make provision about the grant of licences.
(2) The provision that may be made includes provision—
(a) requiring the Secretary of State not to grant a licence unless satisfied as to matters specified in the regulations;
(b) requiring the Secretary of State to have regard, in deciding whether to grant a licence, to matters specified in the regulations.
14C Licence conditions
(1) Medical devices regulations may make provision about licence conditions.
(2) The provision that may be made includes provision—
(a) enabling the Secretary of State to include conditions in a licence;
(b) requiring the Secretary of State to include in a licence a condition specified in the regulations;
(c) specifying conditions that, by virtue of the regulations, are to be treated as included in every licence.
(3) The provision that may be made includes provision about the variation of conditions included in a licence.
(4) Conditions may, in particular—
(a) impose requirements on the licence holder, or
(b) in the case of a product licence, impose requirements relating to the supply or advertising (by anyone) of the medical device to which the licence relates.
(5) Conditions imposing requirements on a licence holder may, in particular—
(a) require the monitoring, investigation or evaluation of the safety or performance of a medical device;
(b) require the provision of information to the Secretary of State;
(c) require the appointment by the licence holder of an individual who is resident in the United Kingdom and is authorised or required to act on the licence holder’s behalf in relation to matters of a specified description.
14D Duration of licences etc
Medical devices regulations may make provision about the duration, renewal, variation, suspension, revocation or transfer of licences.
14E Exemptions for public health purposes
(1) Medical devices regulations may authorise the Secretary of State to grant a temporary exemption from any provision of the regulations for the purposes of protecting public health.
(2) The regulations may provide for an exemption to be subject to conditions set out in the regulations or published by the Secretary of State.
14F Register of licences
Medical devices regulations may include provision for or in connection with the establishment of a public register containing information about licences.
14G Offences
(1) Medical devices regulations may create offences in relation to—
(a) a failure to comply with specified provisions of the regulations, or
(b) the provision of false or misleading information to a person for the purposes of anything required or authorised by the regulations.
(2) The regulations must provide for any such offence to be punishable—
(a) on summary conviction in England and Wales, by imprisonment for a term not exceeding the maximum term for summary offences or a fine (or both), or
(b) on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (or both).
(3) In subsection (2)(a) “the maximum term for summary offences” means—
(a) if the offence is committed before the time when section 281(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 comes into force, six months;
(b) if the offence is committed after that time, 51 weeks.
14H Enforcement
Medical devices regulations may confer functions on the Secretary of State or a local weights and measures authority in relation to the enforcement of the regulations.
14I Fees
(1) Medical devices regulations may make provision for the charging of fees that are payable—
(a) in connection with an application for the grant of a licence, or
(b) by the holder of a licence.
(2) Fees must not exceed an amount specified in, or determined in accordance with, the regulations.
(3) The amount, or method for determining it, may take into account the cost of exercising any functions conferred by virtue of the regulations.
(4) The regulations may confer power on the Secretary of State to waive fees.
14J Interpretation
(1) In this Chapter—
“clinical investigation” means an investigation that involves human subjects, or specimens from the human body, and is undertaken to assess the safety or performance of a medical device;
“grant” , in relation to a licence, includes vary or renew;
“licence” means a product licence or personal licence;
“manufacturing” includes assembling;
“medical devices regulations” has the meaning given by section 14A(1);
“personal licence” has the meaning given by section 14A(5);
“product licence” has the meaning given by section 14A(5);
“supplying” includes—
(a) agreeing to supply, or
(b) offering or exposing for supply.
(2) In this Chapter—
(a) a reference to doing anything in the course of business includes doing it in connection with the provision of services in pursuance of arrangements made under any legislation;
(b) a reference to the supply of a medical device by way of wholesale dealing includes the supply of it to a person who receives it for the purposes of providing services to a patient or for the purposes of supplying it to a patient.
(3) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision as to the circumstances in which a person is to be treated, or is not to be treated, as carrying on an activity “in the course of business” for the purposes of section 14A(1).””
This introduces a new power to make regulations for the licensing of medical devices, which is intended to replace the current regulatory regime in Great Britain.
Government Amendment NC95
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Disclosure of information relating to medicines
(1) The Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading of Chapter 2 of Part 2 omit “International agreements:”.
(3) In section 8 (disclosure of information in accordance with international agreements)—
(a) in the heading omit “in accordance with international agreements”;
(b) for subsections (2) and (3) substitute—
“(2) The relevant authority may disclose such information—
(a) for the purposes of enabling or facilitating the exercise by a public authority of any of its functions,
(b) for the purposes of enabling or facilitating the carrying out by a person of an activity relating to human medicines,
(c) for the purposes of giving effect to an international agreement or arrangement (and the disclosure that may be made for this purpose includes disclosure to a person outside the United Kingdom),
(d) for the purposes of civil proceedings or the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences, or
(e) for the purposes of warning members of the public about matters in relation to human medicines.
(3) The relevant authority may not disclose patient information in reliance on subsection (2)(c) without the consent of the person to whom the information relates.
(3A) The relevant authority may not disclose commercially sensitive information in reliance on subsection (2) unless the relevant authority considers that the disclosure is appropriate, having taken into account the public interest as well as the interests of any person to whom the commercially sensitive information relates.
(3B) In considering whether the disclosure of commercially sensitive information in reliance on subsection (2) is appropriate the overarching objective of the relevant authority must be to safeguard public health (taking into account the safety and availability of human medicines) where that is relevant to the disclosure in question.
(3C) Where information to which this section applies is disclosed to a person in reliance on subsection (2)(a), (b), (c) or (d), the person may not use or further disclose the information except—
(a) with the agreement of the relevant authority and for a purpose mentioned in subsection (2), or
(b) in accordance with an enactment or order of a court or tribunal.”;
(c) in subsection (4), for “subsections (5) and” substitute “subsection”;
(d) omit subsection (5);
(e) in subsection (6)—
(i) omit the “or” at the end of paragraph (a);
(ii) at the end of paragraph (b) insert
“, or
(c) contravenes any obligation or restriction created or arising by or under the Windsor Framework, whether or not an obligation or restriction to which section 7A(2) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 applies.”;
(f) in subsection (8)—
(i) omit the definition of “relevant person”;
(ii) at the appropriate place insert—
““Windsor Framework” has the meaning given by section 20(1) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.””
This creates a general information-sharing gateway for the Secretary of State and Department of Health in Northern Ireland in respect of information about human medicines. At the moment the statutory gateway is limited to disclosures made in accordance with international agreements.
Government Amendment NC96
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Integrated care boards: duty as to visiting etc
After section 14Z36 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“14Z36A Duty as to visiting etc
(1) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, promote appropriate opportunities for anyone provided with accommodation in pursuance of arrangements made by the board to receive visitors.
(2) Each integrated care board must, in the exercise of its functions, promote the option for relevant patients attending hospitals or hospices provided in pursuance of arrangements made by the board to have someone accompany them, so far as appropriate.
(3) In subsection (2) “relevant patient” means an outpatient, day patient or other person attending a hospital or hospice for the provision of care or treatment that does not involve an overnight stay.””
This broadly requires an integrated care board to promote appropriate opportunities for those who are provided with accommodation in pursuance of arrangements made by the board to receive visitors and the option for outpatients and day patients etc to have someone accompany them.
Government Amendment NC97
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Care and support: involvement of others and visitors
In section 1 of the Care Act 2014 (promoting individual well-being), in subsection (3)—
(a) after paragraph (e) insert—
“(ea) the importance of the individual being able to involve other people in such decisions and of those people receiving the information and support necessary to facilitate that involvement;”;
(b) after paragraph (f) insert—
“(fa) the importance of the individual having appropriate opportunities to receive visitors;
(fb) in the case of a person who is provided with accommodation in a care home, the importance of them having appropriate opportunities to take trips outside of the care home;”.”
Section 1(3) of the Care Act 2014 lists matters to which local authorities must have regard when exercising functions under Part 1 of that Act. The amendments refer to the importance of an individual being able to involve other people in decisions and to receive visitors etc.
Government Amendment NC98
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Disclosure of information relating to medical devices
(1) Section 39 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (disclosure of information relating to medical devices) is amended as follows.
(2) For subsections (2) to (7) substitute—
“(2) The Secretary of State may disclose such information—
(a) for the purposes of enabling or facilitating the exercise by a public authority of any of its functions,
(b) for the purposes of enabling or facilitating the carrying out by a person of an activity relating to medical devices,
(c) for the purposes of giving effect to an international agreement or arrangement (and the disclosure that may be made for this purpose includes disclosure to a person outside the United Kingdom),
(d) for the purposes of civil proceedings or the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences, or
(e) for the purposes of warning members of the public about matters in relation to a medical device.
(3) The Secretary of State may not disclose patient information in reliance on subsection (2)(c) without the consent of the person to whom the information relates.
(4) The Secretary of State may not disclose commercially sensitive information in reliance on subsection (2) unless the Secretary of State considers that the disclosure is appropriate, having taken into account the public interest as well as the interests of any person to whom the commercially sensitive information relates.
(5) In considering whether the disclosure of commercially sensitive information in reliance on subsection (2) is appropriate the overarching objective of the Secretary of State must be to safeguard public health (taking into account the safety and availability of medical devices) where that is relevant to the disclosure in question.”
(3) In subsection (8)—
(a) in the words before paragraph (a), for “subsection (3) or (4)” substitute “ subsection (2)(a), (b), (c) or (d)”;
(b) in paragraph (a), for “subsection (3) or (4)” substitute “subsection (2)”.
(4) In subsection (10)(c), for “the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in the EU withdrawal agreement” substitute “the Windsor Framework (as defined by section 20(1) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018)”.
(5) In subsection (12)—
(a) omit the definition of “relevant person”;
(b) at the appropriate place insert—
““Windsor Framework” has the meaning given by section 20(1) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.””
This expands the purposes for which information about medical devices may be shared by the Secretary of State.
Government Amendment NC99
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Further and consequential amendments relating to medical devices
(1) The Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 is amended as follows.
(2) Omit Chapter 1 of Part 4 (medical devices - regulations: general).
(3) The repeal of Chapter 1 of Part 4 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 by subsection (2) does not affect any regulations made under section 15(1) of that Act before its repeal in so far as they extend to Northern Ireland.
(4) In section 21 (compliance notices)—
(a) in subsection (1) omit “involved in marketing or supplying a medical device”;
(b) in subsection (1A)(a), for “15” substitute “14A(1)”;
(c) for subsection (5) substitute—
“(5) Where—
(a) there is a failure to comply with a medical devices provision as it extends to Northern Ireland, and
(b) the person mentioned in subsection (1) is a manufacturer for the purposes of any provision in the EU Medical Devices Regulations,
a notice under subsection (2) may be served on the manufacturer or on another person who has been designated by the manufacturer to act as their representative (or both).
(5A) Nothing in subsection (5) limits the circumstances in which a notice can otherwise be given to a person by giving it to someone on their behalf.”
(5) In section 34 (recovery of expenses of enforcement), in subsection (1)(a), before paragraph (i) insert—
“(ai) regulations under section 14A(1),”
(6) In section 42 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (interpretation of Part 4), in subsection (2) omit the definition of “manufacturer”.
(7) For section 43 substitute—
“43 Power to make consequential etc provision
(1) Regulations under this Act may make consequential provision.
(2) The Secretary of State may by regulations—
(a) make provision that—
(i) is consequential on regulations under section 14A(1) (medical devices regulations in Great Britain), and
(ii) extends to Northern Ireland;
(b) make provision that—
(i) is consequential on regulations under section 14K(1) (power to restate medical devices law in Northern Ireland), and
(ii) extends to England and Wales or Scotland.
(3) The provision that may be made by regulations under section 14A(1) by virtue of subsection (1) of this section, or by regulations under subsection (2)(b) of this section, includes provision amending—
(a) an Act (including this Act),
(b) an Act of the Scottish Parliament, or
(c) an Act of Senedd Cymru.
(4) The provision that may be made by regulations under section 14K(1) by virtue of subsection (1) of this section, or by regulations under subsection (2)(a) of this section, includes provision amending—
(a) an Act (including this Act), or
(b) Northern Ireland legislation.
(5) Regulations under this Act may—
(a) make supplementary, incidental, transitional, transitory or saving provision;
(b) make different provision for different purposes;
(c) make different provision for different areas;
(d) make provision for all cases to which the power applies or for those cases subject to specified exceptions or for any specified cases or descriptions of case.
(6) This section does not apply in relation to—
(a) regulations under sections 50 or 51 (commencement and transitional provision);
(b) regulations under paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 (supplementary provision about civil sanctions).”
(8) In section 45 (consultation), in subsection (3)—
(a) for “15(1)” substitute “14A(1)”;
(b) for “15” substitute “14A(4)”.
(9) In section 47 (regulations: procedure), for subsection (3C) (inserted by section 73 of this Act) substitute—
“(3C) Regulations under Part 4—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision made in reliance on paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 (supplementary 30 provision about civil sanctions);
(b) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a).
(3D) Regulations under Part 5—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they do not contain provision made in reliance on section 43(3) or (4);
(b) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a).”
(10) Omit Part 6 (duty to report on operation of medicines and medical devices legislation within 5 years of passing of Act).
(11) In Schedule 2 (medical devices: civil sanctions)—
(a) in paragraph 1(1), before paragraph (a) insert—
“(za) regulations under section 14A(1),”
(b) in paragraph 4(1)(a), before sub-paragraph (i) insert—
“(ai) regulations under section 14A(1),”
(c) in paragraph 5(1)(a), before sub-paragraph (i) insert—
“(ai) regulations under section 14A(1),”
(d) in paragraph 13(1), in paragraph (a), after “under” insert “regulations under section 14A(1),””
Government Amendment NC100
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Power to amend meaning of “medical device”
In section 42 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (interpretation of Part 4), after subsection (2) insert—
“(3) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about the meaning of “medical device” in this Part (including by amending this section).””
Government Amendment NC101
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryTo move the following Clause—
“Power to restate medical devices law in Northern Ireland
After section 14J of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (inserted by section (Medical devices regulation: Great Britain) of this Act) insert—
“Chapter A2
Power to restate law in Northern Ireland
14K Power to restate law in Northern Ireland
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations restate, to any extent, the Northern Ireland medical devices legislation.
(2) In this section, “the Northern Ireland medical devices legislation” means—
(a) regulations under section 15(1) (before its repeal by section (Medical devices regulation: Great Britain) of the Health Act 2026),
(b) the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/618),
(c) the Medical Devices (Northern Ireland Protocol) Regulations 2021, and
(d) the EU Medical Devices Regulations.
(3) A restatement may use words or concepts that are different from those used in the law being restated.
(4) A restatement may make any change which the Secretary of State considers appropriate for one or more of the following purposes—
(a) resolving ambiguities;
(b) removing doubts or anomalies;
(c) facilitating improvement in the clarity or accessibility of the law (including by omitting anything which is legally unnecessary).
(5) The provision that may be made by the regulations may be made by modifying any enactment.””
This confers a regulation-making power to restate the legislation about medical devices in Northern Ireland. For Great Britain, the existing law will be replaced by the new licensing regulations. This power allows the law for Northern Ireland to be restated (with minor changes of the kind often found in consolidation Acts).
Opposition Amendment NC92
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to report on the regulation of cosmetic surgery
(1) Within three months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a report assessing the effectiveness and safety of current regulation of the cosmetic surgery.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must investigate regulatory measures regarding professional checks on the providers of cosmetic surgery, including whether they—
(a) are registered medical practitioners;
(b) have completed recognised specialist surgical training; and
(c) hold Cosmetic Surgery Board Certification, or an equivalent certification, accreditation or qualification.
(3) The report must also consider the safety of current regulations of the premises where cosmetic surgery procedures are undertaken.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare a report assessing the regulation of cosmetic surgery.
None NC93
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“State of NHS Dentistry report
(1) The Secretary of State must publish and lay before Parliament a report on the state of NHS dentistry in England (“the State of Dentistry Report”) at least once every two years.
(2) The State of Dentistry Report must include an assessment of—
(a) access to NHS dental services and levels of unmet need;
(b) the adequacy, distribution and sustainability of the NHS dental workforce, including general dental services, community dental services, hospital dental services, dental public health consultants and dental academia;
(c) geographical inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes;
(d) inequalities in access to NHS dental services and oral health outcomes between different socioeconomic groups and populations, including but not limited to people living in care homes and people experiencing homelessness;
(e) demand and waiting times for dental treatment in community dental services and secondary care;
(f) the extent to which inadequate access to NHS dental services contributes to avoidable pressure on other parts of the NHS, including primary medical care, urgent and emergency care, hospital services and the prescribing of medicines; and
(g) the measures required to address any deficiencies or inequalities identified under paragraphs (a) to (f).
(3) The report must include such indicators as the Secretary of State considers appropriate for assessing each of the matters set out in subsection (2), and those indicators must, wherever appropriate, be presented in a manner that enables comparisons to be made between different areas and populations and over time, including by reference to population size, full-time equivalent workforce and other relevant measures.
(4) In preparing the report, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to ensure that NHS dental services are sufficient to meet the current and projected need for dental care in England.
(5) The Secretary of State must, within six months of publishing a State of Dentistry Report, set out the measures the Government intends to take in response to the findings of the report.
(6) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for each State of Dentistry Report, and the Government's response to it, to be debated in each House of Parliament.
(7) The first State of Dentistry Report must be published within 12 months of the passing of this Act.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish and lay before Parliament a regular report on the state of NHS dentistry in England, assessing access to and unmet need for NHS dental services, workforce capacity and distribution, geographical and wider inequalities, and the pressure that inadequate access to NHS dental services places on other parts of the NHS. It would also require the Government to respond to each report and ensure that both the report and response are debated in Parliament.
None NC102
Iqbal Mohamed (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“Report on impact on health of social media addiction
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passage of this Act, commission a report on the impact on health of social media addiction.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider and make recommendations concerning—
(a) the mental health effects of social media addiction;
(b) the physical health effects of social media addiction; and
(c) the effects of social media addiction on demand for NHS services.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the report with proposed actions to minimise the health harms of social media addiction before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to commission a report considering the impact on health of social media addiction.
None NC103
Iqbal Mohamed (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“Communication with parents of critically ill children
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, issue guidance to integrated care boards on communication with parents of critically ill children, with particular reference to major decisions in the child’s treatment and care.
(2) Guidance issued under subsection (1) must—
(a) make provision for ensuring that parents have been fully consulted and are fully informed of decisions concerning the care or treatment of their child and the rationale behind such decisions;
(b) make provision, where potentially life-ending or life-changing decisions are to be made, to facilitate parents in accessing an independent specialist second opinion;
(c) make provision, where there is a disagreement between parents and clinicians on the care or treatment of a child, for the appointment of an independent mediator;
(d) make provision, following the advice of an independent specialist second opinion, for transfer of the child to another hospital, subject to appropriate clinical safeguards;
(e) make provision, prior to the death of a child, for family members to be given access to the child, whether in the hospital, a children’s hospice or the family home.
(3) Guidance issued under subsection (1) must have regard to Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to issue guidance to integrated care boards concerning their role in communicating with parents of critically ill children, and involving them in decision-making.
None NC104
Gavin Williamson (Con)To move the following Clause—
“NHS-funded In Vitro Fertilisation
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must by regulations make arrangements for the standardised provision of NHS-funded In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF).
(2) Provision under this section must, in accordance with any existing NICE guidelines, set requirements for all integrated care boards in England relating to NHS-funded IVF.
(3) Requirements under subsection (2) include—
(a) standardisation of the minimum number of rounds of IVF available to one individual, and
(b) standardisation of the maximum and minimum age at which an individual can access IVF.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations standardising NHS-funded IVF provision across all integrated care boards in England, in accordance with existing NICE guidelines, including the number of rounds available to an individual and the age limits for access.
Opposition Amendment NC105
James MacCleary (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Defence)To move the following Clause—
“Lewes constituency: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in the Lewes constituency.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in the Lewes constituency.
None NC106
Anna Dixon (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on the duty to co-operate
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on—
(a) the operation of the duty to co-operate under section 72 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (co-operation between NHS bodies) and section 82 of that Act (co-operation between NHS bodies and local authorities), and
(b) the impact of those duties on the integration of health and social care in England.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider co-operation between—
(a) relevant NHS bodies, and
(b) relevant NHS bodies and local authorities,
in the delivery and commissioning of health and social care.
(3) Within six months of the report under subsection (1) being laid, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make provision to update guidance on the duty to co-operate, and
(b) implement actions to strengthen integration in the report which the Secretary of State considers most appropriate.”
This new clause would place a requirement on the Secretary of State to report to Parliament, within six months of the Act passing, on how well NHS bodies and local authorities are working together to integrate health and social care in England. It would also place a requirement on the Secretary of State to update the related guidance and take action to strengthen this cooperation six months later.
None NC107
Chris Bloore (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Fracture liaison services: implementation framework
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish an implementation framework for ensuring universal access to fracture liaison services in England by 2030.
(2) The framework must set out—
(a) the minimum standards expected of fracture liaison services;
(b) the steps to be taken to reduce unwarranted variation in access and quality between integrated care board areas;
(c) the respective responsibilities of integrated care boards and NHS trusts;
(d) the workforce, diagnostic, digital and data requirements necessary to support implementation; and
(e) arrangements for identifying people at risk of further fragility fractures and ensuring that they receive appropriate assessment, treatment and follow-up.
(3) The Secretary of State must make a statement to Parliament each year, until 2030, setting out progress towards universal access to fracture liaison services.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an implementation framework for ensuring universal access to fracture liaison services in England by 2030.
None NC108
Ian Byrne (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“NHS ethical and sustainable procurement framework
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must conduct a review of the NHS’s ethical and sustainable procurement framework.
(2) Following the review under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must by regulations ensure that contracting authorities can exclude companies from bidding for a tender on the basis of any proven—
(a) involvement in violations of international law and/or,
(b) breaches of internationally accepted standards of business conduct including—
(i) the UN Guiding Principles and,
(ii) OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.”
None NC109
Allison Gardner (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Artificial intelligence governance and auditing
(1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish guidance on the—
(a) governance,
(b) monitoring,
(c) assurance, and
(d) audit of artificial intelligence (AI) systems used in health and care settings.
(2) The guidance under subsection (1) must include—
(a) requirements for healthcare organisations to maintain an inventory of AI systems used in clinical and operational processes,
(b) requirements for proportionate monitoring, by the healthcare organisations, of AI systems throughout their operational lifecycle, including safety, performance and effectiveness,
(c) processes for identifying, investigating and responding to material deterioration in AI system performance,
(d) arrangements for documenting accountability and decision-making responsibilities relating to AI deployment and use,
(e) expectations regarding transparency, reporting, and ability to audit AI enabled services.
(3) Each health and care setting required to implement guidance under this section must designate a senior individual who is responsible for—
(a) the monitoring, assurance and audit of AI systems under subsection (1) in their health or care setting;
(b) supporting AI providers and vendors to perform their post market surveillance as required;
(c) addressing the governance of legacy AI systems; and
(d) addressing the governance and impact of decommissioning of AI systems.
(4) The Care Quality Commission must have regard to the guidance published under subsection (1) when exercising its functions.
(5) The Care Quality Commission should assess whether providers have appropriate arrangements in place for the—
(a) governance,
(b) monitoring, and
(c) safe use of artificial intelligence systems, and may require evidence that such arrangements are operating effectively.”
Government Amendment 60
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 21, page 15, line 34, at end insert “—
(a) at least one member nominated jointly by the local authorities whose areas coincide with, or include the whole or any part of, the integrated care board’s area, and
This amendment restores the requirement for integrated care boards to have at least one member nominated jointly by the local authorities whose areas coincide with, or include the whole or any part of, the integrated care board’s area (as well as any new mayoral nominated member).
Government Amendment 61
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 21, page 16, line 1, leave out from “for” to “as” in line 3 and insert “nominating the ordinary members mention in sub-paragraph (2).
(2)A person participating in the process for nominating the ordinary members”
This is consequential on amendment 60.
Government Amendment 62
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 21, page 16, line 9, at end insert—
““local authority” has the meaning given by section 2B(5);”
This is consequential on amendment 60.
Government Amendment 63
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 27, page 20, line 13, at end insert—
“(4) In section 271 (territorial limit of exercise of functions), in subsection (3), after paragraph (a) insert—
“(aa) Chapter 4 of Part 2 (Special Health Authorities),”.”
Section 271(1) of the NHS Act 2006 provides that ministerial functions under that Act are generally exercisable only in relation to England. This amendment creates an exception for powers to establish Special Health Authorities etc since they may be used to carry out certain functions beyond England (eg operating information systems).
Government Amendment 64
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 39, page 29, line 5, leave out subsection (8)
This removes an unnecessary amendment to subsections (7B) and (7H) of section 75 of the NHS Act 2006 (those subsections are removed entirely by clause 40(3) of the Bill).
Government Amendment 65
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 70, page 49, line 1, leave out from “supply),” to end of line 7 and insert— “for subsection (2), substitute—
“(2) The provision that may be made in reliance on subsection (1)(a) includes provision that—
(a) refers to international agreements, including such agreements as they have effect from time to time;
(b) refers to international standards, including such standards as they have effect from time to time;
(c) refers to United Kingdom standards that are specified in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time.””
This amendment standardises the provisions enabling the Secretary of State to make regulations referring to international standards and agreements (already in section 16(2) of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021), and United Kingdom standards (inserted by this Bill).
Government Amendment 66
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 72, page 50, line 2, leave out “or 4” and insert “4 or 5”
This is consequential on NC99 and ensures that regulations under new section 43(2) of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 are subject to the consultation requirements imposed by new section 45(1ZA) (which is inserted by clause 72).
Government Amendment 67
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 79, page 54, line 19, at end insert—
“(ea) section 61 (sections 56 to 60: interpretation);”
This is a technical amendment which ensures that the interpretation provisions in clause 61 relied on by clauses 56, 58 and 59 will have the same extent as those clauses.
Government Amendment 68
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 79, page 54, line 23, leave out “Section 71 extends” and insert “Sections 71 and (Medical devices regulation: Great Britain) extend”
This is consequential on NC94.
Government Amendment 69
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretaryClause 79, page 54, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) Section (Power to restate medical devices law in Northern Ireland) extends to Northern Ireland only.”
This is consequential on NC101.
Government Amendment 70
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 1, page 73, line 33, leave out from “for” to end of line and insert ““NHS England may recognise a committee formed for an area which it is satisfied” substitute “An integrated care board may recognise a committee formed for an area that includes the whole or part of the integrated care board’s area if it is satisfied that the committee”.”
This amendment makes the geographical extent of a local pharmaceutical committee which can be recognised by an integrated care board consistent with the geographical extent of other, similar committees (for other examples, see paragraphs 12(2), 24(2) and 37(2) of Schedule 1).
Government Amendment 71
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 1, page 74, line 6, leave out sub-paragraph (5).
This amendment is consequential on amendment 70.
Government Amendment 72
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 12, page 150, line 15, at end insert—
“Mental Capacity Act 2005
91A In Schedule AA1 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (deprivation of liberty: authorisation of arrangements enabling care and treatment) (as inserted by section 1 of the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019), for paragraph 8, substitute—
“8 In paragraph 6(1)(d)
“NHS continuing healthcare” has the meaning given by section 12(10) of the Care Act 2014.””
See the explanatory statement to amendment 73.
Government Amendment 73
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 12, page 191, line 36, at end insert—
“328A In section 12 (further provision about assessments), for subsection (10) substitute—
“(10) “NHS continuing healthcare” has the meaning given by regulations.””
This amendment and amendments 74 and 72 are consequential on the repeal by clause 16 of section 6E of the National Health Service Act 2006 and accompanying regulations. Existing regulations contain a definition of “NHS continuing healthcare” which this would replace with a power to define the term in regulations.
Government Amendment 74
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 12, page 192, line 7, at end insert—
“329A In section 52 (supplementary provision about provider failure), for subsection (10) substitute—
“(10) “NHS continuing healthcare” has the meaning given by section 12(10).””
See the explanatory statement to amendment 73.
Government Amendment 75
Yvette Cooper (Lab) - Foreign SecretarySchedule 12, page 197, line 26, at end insert—
“Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Act 2016
369A (1)Section 2 of the Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Act 2016 (database of innovative treatments) is amended as follows.
(2)I
n subsection (1) for
“Health and Social Care Information Centre (“the HSCIC”)”
substitute
“Secretary of State”
.
(3)In subsection (3)(a) in the words before sub-paragraph (i), for
“HSCIC”
substitute
“Secretary of State”
.
(4)In subsection (4)(a) and (b) for “HSCIC” substitute “Secretary of State”.
(5)Omit subsection (6).”
This is a consequential amendment to section 2 of the Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Act 2016, which would replace references to the Health and Social Care Information Centre with references to the Secretary of State, and remove a requirement for the Secretary of State to consult with the Centre before making regulations.
Opposition Amendment NC24
Ben Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Shadow Attorney GeneralTo move the following Clause—
“Strategy for provision of Minor Injuries Units and Urgent Treatment Centres in rural areas
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a strategy for expanding the provision of Minor Injuries Units and Urgent Treatment Centres in rural areas.
(2) The strategy under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on the implementation of the strategy every 12 months after the strategy has been published.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare a strategy for expanding the provision of Minor Injuries Units and Urgent Treatment Centres in rural areas and report on the implementation of the strategy annually.
None NC25
Jeremy Hunt (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Continuity of care and clinical responsibility
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations ensure that every patient has access to a named NHS General Practitioner.
(2) Regulations under this section must make provision for pregnant women to have access to a named clinician for the period of their pregnancy.
(3) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
None NC26
Jeremy Hunt (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Patient safety recommendations: national oversight
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme relating to the oversight of patient safety recommendations (“the scheme”).
(2) The scheme must make provision for the monitoring and delivery of patient safety recommendations arising from—
(a) investigations,
(b) inquiries,
(c) reviews, and
(d) other patient safety bodies,
relating to patient safety.
(3) Within one year beginning on the day on which this Act is passed and every subsequent year, the Secretary of State must lay a report before Parliament on the progress of the scheme.”
None NC27
Jeremy Hunt (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of candour and enforcement of standards of ethical conduct in DHSC
(1) In discharging its expected standards of ethical conduct, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), must, in particular—
(a) set out the steps DHSC will take to ensure that legal services provided to NHS bodies and other relevant health-related organisations are consistent with the statutory duty of candour and the principles of openness, transparency and learning following patient safety incidents,
(b) set out which oversight body is responsible for ensuring the standards set out in DHSC code of ethical conduct are adhered to and enforced,
(c) set out provisions to allow a relevant oversight body to examine, on its own initiative, suspected serious or systemic breaches of DHSC’s code of ethical conduct,
(d) set out a mechanism for ensuring that any breaches of DHSC’s code of ethical conduct are recorded and that proper data is kept and published that records the extent to which complaints have been made regarding its ethical conduct and their outcome.”
None NC28
Adam Dance (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review of NHS neurodiversity policy
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a review on—
(a) standards of NHS care for neurodiverse people,
(b) the effectiveness of current NHS trust policies regarding care for neurodiverse patients,
(c) the quality of training and guidance for frontline NHS staff in supporting neurodiverse patients, and
(d) health outcomes for neurodiverse patients at NHS trusts.
(2) The review under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
None NC29
Adam Dance (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Senior leadership training at NHS trusts
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a review on the effectiveness of training for senior leadership in NHS trusts on—
(a) workplace culture standards,
(b) addressing bullying, and
(c) addressing discrimination on the basis of—
(i) sex,
(ii) race, and
(iii) any other protected characteristic which the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(2) Within one month of the publication of the review under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must publish guidance based on the review for the Department of Health and Social Care to administer to NHS trusts.”
None NC30
Adam Dance (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review into acute stroke support services in rural areas
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a review of acute stroke support services in rural areas.
(2) The review under subsection (1) must include an evaluation of—
(a) decision making processes,
(b) evidence used to justify decisions,
(c) public consultation processes,
(d) health outcomes,
(e) travel times for access to services, and
(f) impact on the NHS workforces.”
None NC31
Adam Dance (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Somerset: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry Somerset.
(2) “Adequate provision” under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
None NC32
Martin Wrigley (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Privacy by design in NHS Single Patient Record and Federated Data Platform architecture
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is privacy by design as part of the delivery of the NHS Federated Data Platform architecture.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), privacy by design includes—
(a) patient data anonymisation outside its usage by clinicians and within the National Data Integration Tenant; and
(b) patient consent for the processing of personal information by NHS.”
None NC33
Martin Wrigley (LD)To move the following Clause—
“NHS ownership of connection software
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that there is NHS ownership of any data connector software architecture used as part of the delivery of the NHS Single Patient Record or Federated Data Platform.
(2) In this section, a data connector means an interface or connection between the NHS Federated Data Platform and any other health system.”
None NC34
Martin Wrigley (LD)lan Sollom
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Retendering of contract for the NHS Federated Data Platform
The Secretary of State must, before February 2027, commence a competitive retendering for the contract to provide the NHS Federated Data Platform.”
None NC35
Martin Wrigley (LD)To move the following Clause—
“NHS contracting for IT or data services
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, by regulations establish a governance framework for the contracting of any IT or data services by the Department of Health and Social Care or any NHS organisation.
(2) The framework established under subsection (1) must include the following provisions—
(a) a party may not bid for any contract for services where such services have previously been provided by the party on a free trial basis;
(b) the automatic extension of contracts should be subject to audit by the National Audit Office;
(c) contract terms must include provision for the department or NHS organisation to take ownership of any bespoke system built or developed by the contractor during the delivery of the contract.
(d) the department or NHS organisation must, at the end of the contract period (or following any extensions) conduct a competitive retendering process; and
(e) where a retendering process takes place under subsection (2)(d), the contractor may not assist in the preparation of the contract specification.
(3) Regulations under this section are to be made by statutory instrument subject to the affirmative procedure.”
None NC36
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the abolition of NHS England takes effect, prepare and lay before Parliament a report setting out a transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England (the "strategy").
(2) The strategy must—
(a) identify and map critical functions and areas of expertise currently exercised by NHS England, including clinical, operational, analytical and patient engagement capabilities;
(b) assess the risk of loss of knowledge, skills and organisational capacity arising from the abolition of NHS England;
(c) set out the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to ensure the retention and effective transfer of such functions, expertise, knowledge and skills; and
(d) assess the likely impact of the transition on the delivery of key health programmes and services, including cancer services.
(3) The Secretary of State must, at intervals of not more than 12 months, lay before Parliament a report on the implementation of the transition strategy.
(4) A report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) progress on workforce retention;
(b) arrangements for the transfer of knowledge, expertise and institutional capability; and
(c) any identified gaps in capability and the steps being taken to address them.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and lay before Parliament a formal transition strategy before the abolition of NHS England, setting out how critical functions and expertise will be identified, retained and transferred. It would also require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament at least annually on the implementation of that strategy.
None NC37
Gavin Williamson (Con)To move the following Clause—
“NHS-funded In Vitro Fertilisation
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must by regulations make arrangements for the standardised provision of NHS-funded In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF).
(2) Provision under this section must, in accordance with any existing NICE guidelines, set requirements for all integrated care boards in England relating to NHS-funded IVF.
(3) Requirements under subsection (2) include—
(a) standardisation of the maximum number of rounds of IVF available to one individual,
(b) standardisation of the maximum and minimum age at which an individual can access IVF.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations standardising NHS-funded IVF provision across all integrated care boards in England, in accordance with existing NICE guidelines, including the number of rounds available to an individual and the age limits for access.
None NC38
Shockat Adam (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“General Ophthalmic Services: national framework, tariff and protected funding
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations establish and maintain a national service specification for the primary ophthalmic services referred to in section 115 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (in this section referred to as general ophthalmic services, "GOS"), setting out the minimum standards of access and provision that integrated care boards are required to secure.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) must establish and maintain a national tariff for GOS, setting out the prices at which GOS must be commissioned by integrated care boards.
(3) An integrated care board must commission GOS in accordance with the national service specification and national tariff established under subsections (1) and (2), and may not exercise any discretion to vary, restrict or reduce provision below the standards so specified.
(4) The Secretary of State must ensure that funding for GOS is allocated to integrated care boards as a ring-fenced, protected funding stream, which—
(a) may not be applied by an integrated care board to purposes other than GOS; and
(b) may not be reduced by an integrated care board in order to meet expenditure requirements in respect of other services.
(5) In determining any expenditure limits or resource allocations for integrated care boards under the National Health Service Act 2006, the Secretary of State must calculate and separately identify the GOS component of each board's allocaton.
(6) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report in each calendar year assessing the extent to which integrated care boards have complied with their obligations under this section.”
None NC39
Daniel Francis (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Community equipment and wheelchair services: standards, performance and outcomes
(1) Each integrated care board must publish standards which apply in its area in relation to the assessment for and supply of community equipment and wheelchair services.
(2) Each integrated care board must monitor its performance against the standards under subsection (1).
(3) Each integrated care board must publish an annual report including—
(a) performance against the standards under subsection (1),
(b) waiting times for the assessment for and supply of community equipment and wheelchair services,
(c) the number and proportion of people waiting longer than 18 weeks for such equipment or services,
(d) outcomes achieved for people by the provision of community equipment and wheelchair services, and
(e) steps taken by the integrated care board to improve the assessment for, and supply of, community equipment and wheelchair services.
(4) For the purposes of this section—
“community equipment and wheelchair services” means equipment, aids, home adaptations or appliances provided to support a person’s independence, safety, care or daily living at home or in the community,including hoists, hospital beds, pressure-relieving mattresses, commodes, shower chairs, walking frames,grab rails, ramps, specialist seating, postural support equipment, associated mobility equipment, and wheelchairs.”
This new clause would require each integrated care board must publish standards which apply in its area in relation to the assessment for and supply of community equipment and wheelchair services and publish an annual report on their adherence to these standards.
None NC40
Caroline Dinenage (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Regulation of online fertility services
(1) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 is amended as follows.
(2) After section 5 insert—
“5A. Regulation of online fertility services
(1) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority shall be responsible for the licensing of organisations providing online fertility services in England and Wales.
(2) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision regarding the arrangements for the licensing of organisations under subsection (1).
(3) Regulations made under subsection (2) are subject to the affirmative procedure.””
This new clause would implement a recommendation of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to extend its regulatory remit to include organisations providing online fertility services.
None NC41
Caroline Dinenage (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Remit of the Human Tissue Authority
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, by order under section 14(4) of the Human Tissue Act 2004, amend the remit of the Human Tissue Authority to include the regulation of funeral directors, private mortuaries, direct cremation services and other organisations which transport or hold the bodies of deceased persons for the purposes of ensuring that the carrying out of their functions is consistent with the protection of public health.
(2) The Authority must establish and maintain a register of the bodies subject to its oversight under subsection (1).
(3) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision regarding the establishment and operation of the register under subsection (2).
(4) Regulations made under subsection (3) are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to extend the remit of the Human Tissue Authority to include regulation of funeral service providers to ensure their activities are consistent with the protection of public health; and to maintain a register of those bodies subject to its regulation.
None NC42
Mark Sewards (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Oversight of funeral service provider premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations establish a body corporate, or confer functions on an existing public authority, ("the Regulator") to provide oversight of the premises and practices connected to the storage, preparation and movement of human remains by funeral service providers in England.
(2) The purpose of the Regulator is to ensure that the activities undertaken under subsection (1) are consistent with the protection of public health.
(3) The Regulator shall be independent in the exercise of its functions and shall not be regarded as a servant or agent of the Crown.
(4) Regulations under this section may, in particular, make provision for—
(a) a scheme for the registration of funeral service providers;
(b) the inspection of premises, vehicles and other facilities used by registered providers for the storage, preparation, care or transportation of deceased persons, or from which funeral services are arranged or conducted;
(c) the publication and enforcement of a code of practice for the funeral services sector; and
(d) the imposition of sanctions, including suspension or removal from the register, for breach of that code.
(5) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) providers of funeral services;
(b) such persons representing the interests of bereaved people as the Secretary of State considers appropriate; and
(c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(6) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
None NC43
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to reduce variation in clinical research funding
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need to—
(a) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to their ability to access clinical research opportunities and participate in clinical trials, and
(b) reduce regional variation in the distribution of clinical research funding across England.”
This new clause would require the place a duty on the Secretary of State to reduce inequalities across England with respect to access to clinical research opportunities and participate in clinical trials and the distribution of clinical research funding across.
None NC44
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the abolition of NHS England takes effect, prepare and lay before Parliament a report setting out a transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England (the "strategy").
(2) The strategy must—
(a) identify and map critical functions and areas of expertise currently exercised by NHS England, including clinical, operational, analytical and patient engagement capabilities;
(b) assess the risk of loss of knowledge, skills and organisational capacity arising from the abolition of NHS England;
(c) set out the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to ensure the retention and effective transfer of such functions, expertise, knowledge and skills; and
(d) assess the likely impact of the transition on the delivery of key health programmes and services, including cancer services.
(3) The Secretary of State must, at intervals of not more than 12 months, lay before Parliament a report on the implementation of the transition strategy.
(4) A report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) progress on workforce retention;
(b) arrangements for the transfer of knowledge, expertise and institutional capability; and
(c) any identified gaps in capability and the steps being taken to address them.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and lay before Parliament a formal transition strategy before the abolition of NHS England, setting out how critical functions and expertise will be identified, retained and transferred. It would also require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament at least annually on the implementation of that strategy.
None NC45
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Secretary of State directions relating to early access to medicines
(1) The Secretary of State may give directions to any of the bodies mentioned in subsection (2) about the implementation of a scheme providing early access to medicines to people with life-threatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
(2) The bodies are—
(a) integrated care board,
(b) NHS Trusts,
(c) NHS Foundation Trusts,
(d) NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts, and
(e) other health and social care bodies.”
This new clause would give the Secretary of State power to direct integrated care boards, NHS Trusts, NHS Foundation Trusts, and NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts to implement a scheme to provide early access to medicines to people with lifethreatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
None NC46
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 4, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen,
(b) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or
(c) have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and
(d) hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens, people with indefinite leave to remain, or settled status who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
None NC47
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission a review of the regime for early and accelerated access to medicines in England and Wales.
(2) The review conducted under subsection (1) must consider—”
None NC48
Iqbal Mohamed (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation final report and recommendations
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, publish a response to the final report and recommendations of the National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation.
(2) The response under subsection (1) must include an action plan covering each of the recommendations of Investigation.
(3) The action plan must have regard for hospitals—
(a) where negligent care has been identified in the provision of maternity and neonatal services, or
(b) where risk factors have been identified that are associated with potential negligent care in the provision of maternity and neonatal services.
(4) The Secretary must report to Parliament each year on the progress made in delivering the action plan.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to produce an action plan in response to the final report and recommendations of the National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation.
Opposition Amendment NC49
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“National Guardian's Office
(1) Within three months beginning on the day which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must re-establish the National Guardian's Office.
(2) The Office established under subsection (1) must—
(a) hold any responsibilities held by the National Guardian's Office as of 29 June 2026; and
(b) be operationally independent.”
This new clause will re-establish the National Guardian’s Office.
Opposition Amendment NC50
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Independence of appointments
The Secretary of State must make provision to ensure that operational decisions regarding the appointment, suspension or removal of—
(a) chairs and directors of NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts, and
(b) chief executives of integrated care boards,
are made exclusively by persons employed in the civil service, upon strictly merit-based criteria.”
This new clause would ensure that any decisions over NHS trusts and ICB leadership are made by civil servants, rather than the Secretary of State, to ensure appointments are made on merit.
Opposition Amendment NC51
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Accident and Emergency: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision relating to Accident and Emergency Department admission.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups Responsibilities and Standing Rules)Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS Constitution for England for every patient to be admitted into an Accident and Emergency Department within 12 hours of approval of their admission being made.
(3) The Secretary of State must establish and implement an Accident and Emergency Scheme (“the Scheme”) to support NHS hospital trusts to achieve the requirement set out in subsection (2).
(4) The Scheme must consider—
(a) creating safety-net social care bed,
(b) increasing step-down care,
(c) publishing a dedicated accident and emergency care workforce plan, and
(d) mandating a qualified clinician is present in every Accident and Emergency waiting room.
(5) The Secretary of State must have due regard to the final report of the Independent Commission on Adult Social Care in establishing the scheme.”
This new clause gives patients a new right in the NHS constitution to be admitted into A&E within 12 hours from decision to admit and requires the Secretary of State to introduce a scheme to achieve this.
Opposition Amendment NC52
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Cancer treatment: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral.
(2) Provision under subsection (1) must by regulations amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to place a right in the NHS constitution for England for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral.
(3) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme to support NHS hospital trusts in meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(4) As part of the Scheme, the Secretary of State must expand the capacity of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
(5) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to Parliament on progress made in meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(6) Any statement made under subsection (5) should be made as close as reasonably practicable to 4 February.”
This new clause would give patients a right under the NHS constitution to start cancer treatment within 62 days of referral and requires the Secretary of State to establish a scheme to deliver this. It also requires the Secretary of State to update the House on progress against the target on or around the time of World Cancer Day.
Opposition Amendment NC53
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Right to a GP appointment
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations, within six months of the passing of this Act, establish a scheme to provide every patient with the right to a GP appointment within seven days of seeking one, or 24 hours if urgent.
(2) The Secretary of State must amend the National Health Service Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups (Responsibilities and Standing Rules) Regulations 2012 to make the right under subsection (1) a right in the NHS constitution.
(3) The Secretary of State may review the scheme every three years from the day on which this Act is passed and amend it through regulations made by statutory instrument.
(4) A statutory instrument under this section may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) For the purposes of this section—
“GP appointment” means an appointment with an appropriate clinician within a GP practice.
“Urgent” means the current definition under GP triaging protocols.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to give patients a new right in the NHS constitution to receive a GP appointment within 7 days, or 24 hours if urgent, and establishes a scheme to deliver this.
Opposition Amendment NC54
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to identify and record unpaid carers
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to identify and record unpaid carers
(1) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to identify persons within its area who are unpaid carers.
(2) An integrated care board must make arrangements to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area—
(a) maintain appropriate systems for recording whether a person is an unpaid carer,
(b) use consistent coding standards for the recording of unpaid carers in health records,
(c) review and update records relating to unpaid carers at appropriate intervals, and
(d) ensure that the identification and recording of unpaid carers forms part of—
(i) primary care registration processes,
(ii) hospital discharge procedures,
(iii) care planning processes, and
(iv) other relevant patient contact pathways.
(3) For the purposes of this section, "unpaid carer" means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
This new clause would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to identify and record unpaid carers when they come into contact with NHS services.
Opposition Amendment NC55
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of carers
(1) Each integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to improving and maintaining the physical health, mental health, and wellbeing of carers within its area.
(2) In exercising its duties under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) reduction of health inequalities experienced by carers,
(b) prevention deterioration in carers’ physical and/or mental health,
(c) involvement of carers in decisions relating to the care of persons for whom they provide care, and
(d) the need to ensure carers are able to access appropriate preventative and other health services and support.
(3) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area—
(a) consider the health and wellbeing needs of carers in care planning and discharge processes,
(b) involve carers appropriately in decisions relating to care and treatment, and
(c) provide carers with information about support available to them for their health and wellbeing.
(4) In preparing a Joint Forward Plan, an integrated care board must include—
(a) an assessment of the health and wellbeing needs of carers within its area,
(b) steps the integrated care board proposes to take to improve outcomes for carers, and
(c) measures for reducing inequalities experienced by carers.
(5) For the purposes of this section, "unpaid carer" means a person who provides or intends to provide care for another person otherwise than by virtue of a contract or other voluntary work.””
This new clause would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to promote the health and wellbeing of carers.
None NC57
Rachael Maskell (Lab)lan Byrne
lan Lavery
Tabled: 28 Aug 2026To move the following Clause—
“Integrated Care Boards: Scrutiny Committee
(1) Each integrated care board must establish a Scrutiny Committee.
(2) Each Committee established under subsection (1) must—
(a) oversee the operation of the integrated care board,
(b) ensure accountability of the integrated care board with regards to—
(i) allocation of resources;
(ii) grievance and complaint management;
(iii) innovation and service redesign in line with Government objectives;
(iv) delivery of services;
(v) integration with social care;
(vi) advancing public health objectives;
(vii) issues relating to workforce or estate; and
(viii) any other issues as designated by the Secretary of State.
(c) have the power to undertake inquiries into innovation on services delivery and outcomes.
(3) The Committee must comprise of—
(a) Members of Parliament representing constituencies in the area covered by the integrated care board,
(b) Chairs of local government health and social care committees in the area covered by the integrated care board,
(c) representatives from Healthwatch England or any patient participation network designated by the Secretary of State, and
(d) Representatives from trade unions including—
(i) two representatives from unions involved in negotiations on Agenda for Change, and
(ii) one representative from a trade union representing doctors or dentists.
(4) The Committee must meet six times each year.
(5) The Chair of the Committee must be elected at an annual general meeting of the Committee.
(6) The Committee must report to the Board of the integrated care board.
(7) The Chair and Chief Executive of each integrated care board and leaders of health providers and services must attend a meeting of a Committee when requested to do so.
(8) Each Committee will report to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.”
Opposition Amendment NC58
Steve Darling (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Work and Pensions)To move the following Clause—
“Torbay Hospital: construction work
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that construction on Torbay hospital is completed by 2030.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure construction work on Torbay Hospital is completed by 2030.
Opposition Amendment NC59
Steve Darling (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Work and Pensions)To move the following Clause—
“Torbay: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Torbay constituency.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Torbay.
Opposition Amendment NC60
Joshua Reynolds (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Investment and Trade)To move the following Clause—
“St Mark’s Hospital, Maidenhead: Walk-in urgent care centre
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that a walk-in urgent care centre at St Mark’s Hospital in Maidenhead is open by 30 August 2027.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of state to ensure a walk-in urgent care centre is opened at St Marks Hospital in Maidenhead by 30/08/2027.
None NC61
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Harrogate and Knaresborough: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Harrogate & Knaresborough.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Harrogate and Knaresborough.
None NC62
Liz Jarvis (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Eastleigh: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Eastleigh.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Eastleigh.
Opposition Amendment NC63
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“Social Care
(1) Within 3 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament detailed proposals for reform of the social care sector.
(2) Proposals under subsection (1) must include provision for—
(a) a respite care scheme;
(b) reform of carers allowance;
(c) free personal care; and
(d) a cap on care costs.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to lay before Parliament plans to reform the social care sector, including free personal care, a cap on care costs and that delivers for family carers.
Opposition Amendment NC64
Jess Brown-Fuller (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Justice)To move the following Clause—
“Chichester: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Chichester.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Chichester.
None NC65
Ian Roome (LD)To move the following Clause—
“North Devon District Hospital: maternity services
(1) Within 3 months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must reopen birthing services at North Devon District Hospital.
(2) In meeting the requirement under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must ensure that the workforce at North Devon District Hospital is sufficient to ensure consistent and safe staffing levels.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to reopen maternity services at North Devon District Hospital within 3 months of the passage of this Act.
None NC66
Ian Roome (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Maternity services: safe staffing levels
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that maternity staffing levels are sufficient to ensure all residents in England can access a staffed maternity unit within 45 minutes of their home.
(2) The Secretary of State must ensure adequate workforce planning, including through delivery of a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist recruitment and retention plan, to ensure that maternity units are not required to close as a result of staffing issues.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on the progress made on national maternity staffing levels under this section.”
This new clause would ensure that no maternity units are forced to close as a result of staffing issues and that every person in England has access to a maternity unit within 45 minutes of their home.
None NC67
Ian Roome (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Workforce planning and supply
(1) After section 1 of the National Health Service Act 2006 insert—
“1ZA Secretary of State’s duty as to workforce planning and supply
(1) The Secretary of State must promote in England a comprehensive system of workforce planning and supply designed to secure that there are sufficient people with the necessary skills and experience to provide services as part of the health service.
(2) In meeting the requirement under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must exercise the functions conferred by this Act so as to secure that the workforce needs of the health service are assessed and met.
(3) The Secretary of State retains ministerial responsibility to Parliament for workforce planning and supply for the health service in England.”
(2) For section 1GA of the National Health Service Act 2006 substitute—
“Workforce strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a strategy setting out how the Secretary of State proposes to discharge the duty under section 1ZA.
(2) The strategy must include—
(a) an assessment of the current workforce of the health service;
(b) projections of the workforce required to meet the needs of the health service over periods of five, ten and fifteen years beginning with the day on which the strategy is published;
(c) an assessment of the expected supply of people available to meet those requirements;
(d) an assessment of any difference between the projected workforce requirements and expected workforce supply;
(e) the measures that the Secretary of State proposes to take to address any such difference; and
(f) an assessment of the financial and other resources required to implement those measures.
(3) In preparing or revising the strategy, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) integrated care boards;
(b) NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts;
(c) persons providing services as part of the health service;
(d) trade unions representing persons employed or otherwise engaged in the provision of those services;
(e) professional bodies and professional regulators;
(f) persons concerned with the provision of education and training for the workforce;
(g) persons representing patients; and
(h) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) The first strategy under this section must be published before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force.
(5) The Secretary of State must—
(a) review the strategy before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which it was last published, and
(b) following each review, publish a revised strategy.
(6) The Secretary of State may revise the strategy before the end of that period if the Secretary of State considers it appropriate to do so.
(7) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a copy of each strategy published under this section.
(8) The Secretary of State must have regard to the strategy when exercising functions in relation to the health service.””
This new clause places responsibility for workforce planning and supply for the health service in England on the Secretary of State, including ministerial responsibility to Parliament. It also requires the Secretary of State to publish a strategy setting out projected workforce requirements and supply, and the measures and resources needed to meet those requirements.
None NC68
Jim Dickson (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on dementia care
(1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia.
(b) the provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must have regard to—
(a) any targets or standards set out in a national plan, guidance, or framework relating to dementia services, and
(b) any other information the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) A report under subsection (1) must include—
(a) an assessment of variation in dementia services and outcomes between Integrated Care Board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers of dementia patients,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the provision of NHS care and social care in relation to dementia.
None NC69
Simon Opher (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Self-care
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1C insert—
“1CA Duty as to self-care
In exercising functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must have regard to the importance of—
(a) promoting self-care and improving health literacy as part of the prevention of illness and the improvement of health and wellbeing;
(b) supporting people to manage self-treatable conditions independently where appropriate; and
(c) the role of community pharmacy in supporting self-care and prevention and helping people to access appropriate care.””
This new clause would require the Secretary of State, when exercising functions in relation to the health service, to have regard to the importance of promoting self-care and improving health literacy, supporting people to manage self-treatable conditions, and the role of community pharmacy in supporting self-care and prevention.
Opposition Amendment NC70
Anna Sabine (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Frome and East Somerset constituency: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Frome and East Somerset constituency.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Frome and East Somerset constituency.
None NC71
Manuela Perteghella (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Stratford-on-Avon constituency: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Stratford-on-Avon constituency.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Stratford-on-Avon constituency.
None NC72
Manuela Perteghella (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Provision of Minor Injuries Units in Rural Areas
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish and implement a strategy to improve access to minor injuries units in rural communities.
(2) The strategy under subsection (1) must include measures to—
(a) expand, maintain and protect existing minor injuries units serving rural populations;
(b) ensure that integrated care boards assess local demand for urgent treatment services in rural constituencies and make provision accordingly, and
(c) promote the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals required to staff such facilities.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an annual report on—
(a) the number and geographical distribution of minor injuries units in England;
(b) changes in patient access to urgent care services in rural areas; and
(c) progress made in implementing the strategy required under subsection (1).
(4) In this section, “rural constituency” means a parliamentary constituency designated as predominantly rural by the Office for National Statistics or such successor body as may be prescribed by regulations.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to expand and safeguard minor injuries units in rural communities with the aim of improving access to urgent care, reducing pressure on major hospitals, and ensuring equitable healthcare provision regardless of geography.
None NC73
Alex Brewer (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital: construction work
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that construction on Basingstoke and North Hampshire hospital is underway by 2030.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
None NC74
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Protection of pharmacy staff during provider failure
(1) The Secretary of State must establish arrangements to protect the pay and essential employment protections of staff employed by a provider of pharmaceutical services where the provider—
(a) becomes insolvent,
(b) ceases to provide pharmaceutical services,
(c) has its arrangements for providing pharmaceutical services suspended or terminated, or
(d) is otherwise unable to meet its obligations to its employees.
(2) Arrangements under subsection (1) must provide for—
(a) the continuation, so far as reasonably practicable, of payment of wages to affected staff,
(b) the preservation of essential employment protections during the period of emergency intervention,
(c) the maintenance of staffing necessary for the safe provision of pharmaceutical services, and
(d) the transfer, continuation or replacement of employment arrangements where necessary to secure continuity of pharmaceutical services.
(3) The Secretary of State may make payments to, or in respect of, affected staff for the purposes of this section.
(4) The Secretary of State may recover from the failed provider any sums paid under subsection (3).
(5) Arrangements under this section must be capable of operating at the same time as arrangements made under section 133 of the National Health Service Act 2006 to secure alternative provision of pharmaceutical services.
(6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the operation of arrangements under this section.”
This new clause would protect pharmacy staff's pay and essential employment rights when a provider fails, while supporting continuity of services.
None NC75
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Integrated primary care teams
(1) Each integrated care board must make arrangements to promote the provision of joined-up primary care services across general practice, primary dental services and pharmaceutical services.
(2) Arrangements under subsection (1) must, so far as reasonably practicable, provide for—
(a) general practitioners, dentists, pharmacists and other relevant primary care professionals to work together as part of integrated local primary care teams;
(b) the sharing of relevant patient information between those professionals through secure and interoperable digital systems;
(c) the use of common or interoperable care records, so that relevant clinical information can be accessed by an authorised professional involved in a patient's care;
(d) appropriate mechanisms for referral and communication between general practice, dental practices and community pharmacies;
(e) the reduction of duplication in assessments, prescribing, referrals and administrative processes; and
(f) improved continuity and coordination of care for patients with multiple or ongoing health needs.
(3) In exercising its functions under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to the need to ensure that patients can move between general practice, primary dental services and pharmaceutical services without unnecessary duplication, delay or loss of relevant clinical information.
(4) The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about—
(a) minimum interoperability standards for systems used by providers of primary medical, dental and pharmaceutical services;
(b) standards for the secure exchange of patient information;
(c) common data standards and clinical terminology;
(d) electronic referrals and communications between providers; and
(e) such other matters as the Secretary of State considers necessary to support integrated primary care.
(5) Regulations under subsection (4) must include appropriate safeguards for patient confidentiality, information governance and the lawful processing of personal data.
(6) In this section—
“primary care team” means a group of health professionals and providers working together to provide or coordinate primary care services;
“primary dental services” has the meaning given by section 98C of the National Health Service Act 2006; and
“pharmaceutical services” includes services provided under Part 7 of that Act.”
This new clause would promote joined-up working between GPs, dentists and pharmacists to improve coordination and continuity of care.
None NC76
Edward Morello (LD)To move the following Clause—
“West Dorset: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in West Dorset.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in West Dorset.
None NC77
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Newbury: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Newbury.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Newbury.
Opposition Amendment NC78
Danny Chambers (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Mental Health)To move the following Clause—
“Royal Hampshire County Hospital: construction work
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that construction on Royal Hampshire County Hospital is completed by 2030.
(2) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of state to ensure construction work on Royal Hampshire County Hospital is completed by 2030.
None NC79
Kate Osborne (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Voluntary sector role in neighbourhood health plans
(1) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan, a responsible local authority and integrated care board must take and demonstrate reasonable steps to ensure the plan is co-produced with meaningful involvement by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise sector in that area, including the development, design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the plan.
(2) In meeting the requirement under subsection (1) a local authority and integrated cared board must in particular have regard to—
(a) organisations representing people with lived experience of health conditions;
(b) organisations working with underserved or marginalised populations; and
(c) the role of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in delivering community-based services.
(3) The responsible local authority and integrated care board must demonstrate how they have ensured ongoing and meaningful representation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations across the governance, decision-making and commissioning arrangements relating to neighbourhood health plans at all stages of the planning process.”
This new clause would require local authorities and integrated care boards to take and demonstrate reasonable steps to ensure neighbourhood health plans are co-produced with meaningful involvement by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise sector in the local area.
None NC80
Kate Osborne (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Power to enable reservation and prioritisation of contracts for the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector
(1) In exercising their commissioning functions, integrated care boards must take reasonable steps to secure the participation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in the provision of services.
(2) The Secretary of State must through regulations enable integrated care boards to reserve and/or prioritise contracts to be delivered by voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations as part of their commissioning process.
(3) Circumstances in which contracts may be appropriate to be reserved or prioritised under subsection (2) include—
(a) services that are, or could be, community-based;
(b) services that are intended to reach populations that are underserved, marginalised, or experiencing health inequalities; or
(c) where voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations are best placed to deliver person-centred and/or culturally competent care.
(4) In exercising functions under this section, integrated care boards must have regard to—
(a) the need to reduce health inequalities;
(b) the importance of securing equitable access to services across different areas; and
(c) the sustainability of voluntary, community and social enterprise provision.”
This new clause would require integrated care boards to take reasonable steps to secure the participation of voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations in the provision of services through the ICB commissioning process.
None NC84
Claire Young (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Thornbury and Yate constituency: dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Thornbury and Yate constituency.
(2) Adequate provision under subsection (1) means—
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Thornbury and Yate constituency.
None NC85
Jen Craft (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Duties on integrated care boards regarding education, health and care plans
(1) The Secretary of State must exercise the powers in Part 3 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (children with special education needs) with a view to securing that integrated care boards (“ICBs”) are subject to the same relevant requirements as local authorities in relation to the duty to secure the specified special educational provision for a child or young person in the preparation of education, health and care plans (“EHC plans”) under that Part.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the relevant requirements are—
(a) that the special educational provision set out in section F of an EHC plan meets the needs identified by an EHC needs assessment;
(b) that ICBs can be required to provide such special educational provision;
(c) that ICBs must provide such special educational provision from the date the EHC plan is finalised or issued;
(d) that ICBs are subject to appeals to the First-tier Tribunal in accordance with section 51 of the Children and Families Act 2014; and
(e) that any duty on ICBs to provide such special educational provision does not impact upon an ICB’s duty to arrange health care provision, where this is required by an EHC plan.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations placing a statutory duty on integrated care boards to ensure that where an EHC plan specifies special education provision, they are subject to the same duty as local authorities to ensure that this is arranged for the child or young person.
None NC86
Jeff Smith (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Compassionate access to innovative treatments
(1) In exercising their functions in relation to the health service, the Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for compassionate access to innovative treatments, involving substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions in circumstances where conventional treatments have been unsuccessful, unsuitable, or unavailable.
(2) Regulations made under this section must make provision for the authorisation, supply, possession, administration and supervision of such treatments, notwithstanding any restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, including provision for—
(a) appropriate clinical and regulatory safeguards;
(b) approval arrangements for participating clinicians, providers and pharmacies; and
(c) case-by-case decision-making having regard to clinical need, patient safety, and available evidence.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a serious or life-threatening condition is defined as a condition involving a substantial risk to life or serious impairment of health or functioning.
(4) Regulations under this section are to be made by statutory instrument subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make provision for compassionate access to innovative treatments, involving substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions in certain circumstances.
None NC87
Jeff Smith (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Research into innovative treatments involving controlled substances
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations take steps to enable and support the development of research relating to innovative treatments, which use substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.
(2) Regulations made under this section must make provision, for—
(a) the lawful possession, supply, administration, production and importation of such substances for the purposes of clinical trials or other research activities approved in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary of State, notwithstanding any prohibition or restriction imposed by or under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001; and
(b) proportionate and timely arrangements relating to the approval, licensing and oversight of authorised research activities under this section.
(3) Provision under subsection (2) applies to—
(a) approved research bodies,
(b) authorised researchers, and
(c) participating healthcare providers,
and specified substances used for approved research purposes, and does not alter the schedule or classification of a substance.
(4) Regulations under this section are to be made by statutory instrument subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to take steps to enable and support the development of research relating to innovative treatments, which use substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.
Opposition Amendment NC88
Bobby Dean (LD) - Liberal Democrat Shadow Leader of the House of CommonsTo move the following Clause—
“New Hospital Programme: publication of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) reports
(1) Within three months beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish the MCDA reports used to determine the prioritisation of schemes and their allocation to waves within the New Hospital Programme.
(2) The information published under subsection (1) must include—
(a) the multi-criteria decision support analysis tool used to prioritise schemes;
(b) the input data used in that analysis for each hospital in the New Hospital Programme;
(c) the scoring mechanism used in that analysis;
(d) any assessment of estate condition, including data from the NHS England Estate Return Information Collection;
(e) any assessment of patient safety, service disruption or maintenance backlog;
(f) any assessment of the presence of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete;
(g) any assessment of the risks associated with delaying individual schemes; and
(h) any review of the appropriateness of the input data or scoring mechanism by NHS England or the Department of Health and Social Care.
(3) The Secretary of State may redact information published under this section where publication would—
(a) prejudice commercial negotiations,
(b) disclose personal data, or
(c) endanger the safety or security of patients, staff or NHS premises.
(4) Where information is redacted under subsection (3), the Secretary of State must publish a statement explaining the reason for the redaction.
(5) The Secretary of State must lay the reports and information published under this section before Parliament.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to publish the criteria, input data and scoring mechanism used to determine the prioritisation of schemes and their allocation to waves within the New Hospital Programme. Whilst the input data was obtained from publicly available sources, the MCDA reports are currently not publicly available.
Opposition Amendment NC89
Bobby Dean (LD) - Liberal Democrat Shadow Leader of the House of CommonsTo move the following Clause—
“New Hospital Programme: estate failure
(1) Within six months beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must review whether hospitals experiencing significant estate failure are being appropriately prioritised within the New Hospital Programme.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), “significant estate failure” includes the closure, partial closure or restricted use of hospital buildings because of structural, safety or infrastructure failures.
(3) In prioritising schemes within the New Hospital Programme, the Secretary of State must ensure that hospitals experiencing significant estate failure are treated with the same urgency as hospitals affected by reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish the outcome of the review in subsection (1).”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to review whether hospitals experiencing significant estate failure are being appropriately prioritised within the New Hospital Programme, and to ensure that such hospitals are treated with the same urgency as RAAC-affected hospitals.
None NC90
Allison Gardner (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to reduce health inequalities
(1) Section 2B of the National Health Service Act 2006 (functions of local authorities and Secretary of State as to improvement of public health) is amended as follows.
(2) In the heading, after “health” insert “and reduction of health inequalities”.
(3) In subsection (2)—
(a) for “may” substitute “must”; and
(b) after “England” insert “and reducing health inequalities between the people of England”.
(4) In subsection (3), after paragraph (g) insert—
“(h) collaborating with any government department or local authority.”
(5) After subsection (5) insert—
“(6) In this section, “health inequalities between the people of England” means health inequalities between persons, or persons of different descriptions, living in England or in different parts of England.
(7) In this section, “health inequalities” means inequalities in respect of life expectancy or general state of health which are wholly or partly a result of differences in respect of general health determinants.
(8) In subsection (7), “general health determinants” include—
(a) standards of housing, transport services or public safety;
(b) environmental factors, including air quality and access to green space and bodies of water;
(c) employment prospects, earning capacity and any other matters that affect levels of prosperity;
(d) the degree of ease or difficulty with which persons have access to public services;
(e) the use, or level of use, of tobacco, alcohol or other substances, and any other matters of personal behaviour or lifestyle, that are or may be harmful to health; and
(f) any other matters that are determinants of life expectancy or the state of health of persons generally, other than genetic or biological factors.
(9) In subsection (2), the reference to reducing health inequalities includes mitigating any increase in health inequalities which would otherwise be occasioned by the exercise of the Secretary of State’s functions.””
None NC91
Allison Gardner (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Health improvement and health inequalities strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a health improvement and health inequalities strategy.
(2) In preparing the strategy, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) The strategy must include—
(a) long-term targets relating to health improvement and the reduction of health inequalities in England throughout a person's life;
(b) provision for the establishment of a public authority with functions relating to the additional monitoring of, and reporting on, progress towards the targets included in the strategy in accordance with paragraph (a); and
(c) such other provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(4) The long-term targets included in the strategy in accordance with subsection (3)(a) must include—
(a) at least one target relating to the improvement of the health of persons under the age of 18 in England; and
(b) at least one target relating to the improvement of the health of persons aged 18 or over in England.
(5) A Minister of the Crown must, in exercising the Minister’s functions, have regard to the strategy.
(6) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a report on the implementation of the strategy—
(a) within 12 months of the publication of the strategy; and
(b) at intervals of no more than 12 months thereafter.
(7) In this section, “health inequalities” means inequalities in respect of life expectancy or general state of health which are wholly or partly a result of differences in respect of general health determinants.”
None 37
Tom Gordon (LD)Clause 6, page 4, line 11, at end insert—
“(1A) For the purposes of subsection (1) the Secretary of State must ensure that innovation in the provision of health services is supported and developed equitably across all regions of England, including by reducing inequalities in clinical research funding and clinical research capacity between different regions of England.”
This amendment would ensure that in exercising their duty to promote innovation in the provision of health services, the Secretary of State must ensure that innovation in the provision of health services is supported and developed equitably across all regions of England.
None 38
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 11, page 6, line 28, leave out lines 28 and 29 and insert—
“(1) Where the geographic area covered by an integrated care board sits within a Mayoral Combined Authority, the relevant Mayor may give integrated care boards directions as to the exercise of their functions.
(1A) Where the geographic area covered by an integrated care board does not sit within a Mayoral Combined Authority, the Secretary of State may give integrated care boards directions as to the exercise of their functions.”
This amendment would give direction-making powers over integrated care boards to Combined Authority Mayors where boards sit within their authority. The Secretary of State would retain direction-making power where there is no relevant Combined Authority Mayor.
None 39
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 11, page 7, line 4, after “Secretary of State” insert “or relevant Combined Authority Mayor”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 38.
None 40
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 11, page 7, line 11, after “Secretary of State” insert “or relevant Combined Authority Mayor”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 38.
None 53
Edward Morello (LD)Clause 14, page 10, leave out lines 40 to 44 and insert—
“(a) confers functions on integrated care boards in relation to commissioning primary care services, including the provision of alternative general medical services for patients who—
(i) are unable to obtain appropriate care from the general practice responsible for their usual catchment area, or
(ii) no longer reasonably feel able or comfortable to receive care from that general practice,
(b) requires integrated care boards to make arrangements to support access to such alternative provision where it is necessary to meet the reasonable requirements of those patients,
(c) transfers related functions from NHS England to the Secretary of State, and
(d) contains other amendments relating to primary care services.”
This amendment would require integrated care boards to support and arrange alternative general practice provision for patients who cannot access appropriate care from their usual catchment GP practice, or who reasonably no longer feel able or comfortable receiving care from that practice.
None 32
Daniel Francis (Lab)Clause 16, page 12, line 10, at end insert—
“(3) Regulations under this section must make provision requiring integrated care boards to make arrangements which ensure that community equipment and wheelchair services are provided within 18 weeks of the date on which a person is assessed as requiring such equipment or services.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3)—
“community equipment and wheelchair services” means equipment, aids, home adaptations or appliances provided to support a person’s independence, safety, care or daily living at home or in the community, including hoists, hospital beds, pressure-relieving mattresses,commodes, shower chairs, walking frames, grab rails, ramps, specialist seating, postural support equipment, associated mobility equipment, and wheelchairs.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to make regulations which would require integrated care boards to ensure that community equipment and wheelchair services are provided within 18 weeks of the date on which a person is assessed as requiring such equipment or services.
Opposition Amendment 34
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)Clause 16, page 12, line 16, at end insert—
“(1A) The regulations must impose a duty on integrated care boards to make provision for any person with a terminal illness diagnosis to be offered a conversation with a relevant healthcare professional about their needs for end-of-life care, including their—
(a) mental and physical health support needs, and
(b) financial support needs.
(1B) For the purposes of subsection (1A), if a person with a terminal illness diagnosis is unable to have the conversation, an integrated care board must ensure that the person’s next-of-kin are offered a conversation.
(1C) The regulations must make provision for any relevant authorities to have regard to the needs identified in a conversation under subsection (1A).”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to make regulations which make provision for the any person with a terminal illness diagnosis to be offered a conversation with a relevant authority about their needs for end-of-life care.
None 28
Shockat Adam (Ind)Clause 16, page 12, line 22, at end insert—
“14Z45BA Patient choice: community services substituting for consultant-led elective care
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision to enable patients to make choices in respect of non-consultant-led community services where those services are commissioned as a direct substitute for, or to prevent a referral to, consultant-led elective services.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a service is to be regarded as a direct substitute for, or intended to prevent a referral to, consultant-led elective services if it—
(a) provides assessment, treatment or management for a condition that would otherwise be referred to a secondary care specialist; or
(b) is commissioned by an integrated care board for the purpose of reducing or managing demand on secondary or elective care.
(3) Services to which this section applies include, but are not limited to—
(a) community audiology services;
(b) community glaucoma management and monitoring services; and
(c) minor eye conditions services.
(4) Regulations made by virtue of this section must ensure that—
(a) patients are offered a choice of any clinically appropriate provider commissioned under a qualifying NHS contract for the relevant service;
(b) no limitation on the number of providers from which a patient may choose is imposed solely on grounds of cost or demand management; and
(c) patients are provided with information enabling them to make an informed choice, including information about waiting times and quality.
(5) An integrated care board must not commission a community service of a kind falling within subsection (2) in a manner which has the effect of restricting patient choice below the standard that would apply to an equivalent consultant-led elective service.”
Opposition Amendment 36
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)Clause 20, page 15, line 25, at end insert—
“(2A) Performance assessments must include details of how each integrated care board is meeting its duty to provide palliative care services or facilities to meet the reasonable requirements of the people for whom it has responsibility.
(2B) For the purposes of subsection (2A) the following guidance are considered reasonable requirements—
(a) NICE guideline [NG31] “Care of dying adults in the last days of life 2015”,
(b) NICE guideline [NG142] “End of life care for adults: service delivery 2019”,
(c) NICE quality standard [QS13] “End of life care for adults 2021”,
(d) NHS England “Palliative and End of Life Care” Statutory Guidance for Integrated Care Boards (September 2022).”
This amendment would require annual performance assessments to incorporate an assessment of whether each integrated care board is providing a reasonable standard of palliative and end of life care.
None 45
Rachael Maskell (Lab)Page 15, line 29, leave out Clause 21
None 29
Paulette Hamilton (Lab)Clause 21, page 15, line 38, at end insert—
“(2A) The constitution must provide for the ordinary members appointed as mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(b) to include at least one member nominated jointly by the local authorities whose areas coincide with, or include the whole or any part of, the integrated care board's area.”
This amendment would require integrated care boards to have a member jointly nominated by local authorities from within the board's area.
None 30
Paulette Hamilton (Lab)Clause 21, page 16, line 3, leave out from “mayor” to “must” and insert “or local authority nominating an ordinary member as mentioned in sub-paragraphs (2) and (2A)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 29 and would require a local authority involved in nominating a member of an integrated care board to have regard to guidance published by the Secretary of State.
None 31
Paulette Hamilton (Lab)Clause 21, page 16, line 9, at end insert—
““local authority” has the meaning given by section 2B;”
This amendment is consequential on Amendments 29 and 30 and defines the term “local authority”.
None 55
Edward Morello (LD)Clause 42, page 30, line 29, at end insert—
“(5) After subsection (6) insert—
“(7) Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that a pharmacy provider has materially failed to comply with contractual, patient-safety or workforce obligations, the Secretary of State may by direction require the relevant integrated care board—
(a) to suspend or terminate arrangements with that provider, where appropriate,
(b) to make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services,
(c) to secure continuity of the supply of medicines and other pharmaceutical services, and
(d) to take such other emergency measures as may be specified in the direction.
(8) A direction under subsection (7) may be given where the Secretary of State considers that there is a significant risk to patient safety, continuity of medicines supply or the provision of pharmaceutical services.
(9) The Secretary of State must ensure that arrangements made under subsection (7) are implemented as soon as reasonably practicable.
(10) A direction under subsection (7) must specify the period for which it has effect and must be published.””
This amendment would enable intervention where a pharmacy provider seriously fails to meet contractual, safety or workforce obligations, ensuring continuity of services and medicines supply.
None 58
Edward Morello (LD)Clause 42, page 30, line 29, at end insert—
“(7) Where a situation or event has resulted, or is likely to result, in the closure, failure or disruption of a provider of pharmaceutical services, the Secretary of State and the relevant integrated care board must provide such assistance and support as is necessary to enable a new provider to establish or continue the provision of pharmaceutical services.
(8) Assistance or support under subsection (7) may include facilitating and establishing a relationship between a new provider and the manufacturers or suppliers of medicines and other pharmaceutical products.
(9) The assistance and support under subsection (7) must be available, in particular, where a new provider is—
(a) taking over premises previously operated by a provider of pharmaceutical services that has failed or closed,
(b) taking over premises where there has been evidence of serious misconduct, including malpractice or failure to pay staff, or
(c) an independent provider or a provider which is not part of a large company operating multiple pharmacy premises.
(10) The purpose of assistance and support under this section is to enable the new provider to secure supplies of medicines and other pharmaceutical products as quickly as reasonably practicable and to minimise any interruption in the provision of pharmaceutical services.”
This amendment would require the Government and integrated care boards to support new and independent pharmacy owners taking over failing, closed or disrupted pharmacies, including by helping them establish relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers so that they can secure medicines and other supplies quickly and maintain continuity of service.
None 59
Edward Morello (LD)Clause 47, page 32, line 15, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) In determining the amount to be allotted to an integrated care board under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to the additional costs of providing health services in rural and coastal communities.
(4B) The matters to which the Secretary of State must have regard under subsection (4A) include—
(a) rurality,
(b) population age,
(c) transport and travel costs,
(d) seasonal changes in demand,
(e) recruitment and retention difficulties,
(f) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated communities, and
(g) unmet need for primary medical, dental and pharmaceutical services.
(4C) The Secretary of State must ensure that the methodology used in determining allotments does not rely predominantly on measures of deprivation where those measures fail adequately to reflect the costs or unmet need as set out in subsection (4B).
(4D) The Secretary of State must publish the methodology used in determining allotments under this section and must review that methodology at intervals of not more than five years.”
This amendment would require ICB funding allocations to reflect the additional costs and unmet health needs of rural and coastal communities.
Opposition Amendment 44
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)Clause 47, page 33, line 20, at end insert—
“(f) require the integrated care board to use a portion of the designated amount for the provision of social care services and support for the health and wellbeing of unpaid carers.”
This amendment would allow the Secretary of State to require that certain funds allocated to an integrated care board be used for the provision of social care services and support for the health and wellbeing of unpaid carers.
None 26
Martin Wrigley (LD)Clause 51, page 35, line 38, after “available” insert “for the purpose of delivering or improving patient health or social care”
None 42
Martin Wrigley (LD)Clause 51, page 36, line 1, leave out “health” and insert “direct patient”
This amendment clarifies that the Secretary of State’s regulation-making powers in respect of the single patient record are limited to the provision of direct patient care and social care.
None 43
Martin Wrigley (LD)Clause 51, page 36, line 11, leave out “including” and insert “solely for the purposes of”
This amendment would ensure that regulations requiring or authorising the making available of patient information through the single patient record system can only make provision in respect of the circumstances set out in the Bill.
None 27
Martin Wrigley (LD)Clause 51, page 36, line 21, leave out lines 21 to 23
Opposition Amendment 35
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)Clause 51, page 36, line 21, at end insert—
“The regulations must make provision for patient information to be readily available to providers of palliative and end-of-life care including voluntary sector providers.”
This amendment would ensure the single patient record is available to all palliative and end of life care providers.
None 52
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 57, line 15, at end insert—
“83B Primary care estate investment programme
(1) The Secretary of State must establish and maintain a programme for providing capital funding for the improvement and modernisation of premises used for the provision of primary medical services.
(2) The programme must prioritise practices where premises—
(a) are no longer fit for purpose,
(b) require substantial repair, adaptation or modernisation, or
(c) otherwise materially restrict the provision of safe, accessible or effective primary medical services.
(3) The Secretary of State must ensure that the process for applying for and accessing capital funding under this section is proportionate and does not impose unnecessary administrative burdens.
(4) The arrangements must be designed to ensure that a viable provider of primary medical services is not prevented from carrying out essential improvements because of insufficient access to capital funding.
(5) In this section “premises” includes premises owned, leased or otherwise occupied for the provision of primary medical services.”
This amendment would establish a capital funding programme to improve and modernise primary care and General Practice premises.
None 50
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 57, line 26, at end insert—
“5A after section 87 insert—
“87A Sustainable funding for general practice
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that arrangements for payments under general medical services contracts provide for sustained investment in general practice.
(2) In exercising functions under this section, the Secretary of State must have regard to the role of general practice in—
(a) preventing illness,
(b) managing long-term conditions,
(c) providing care in the community, and
(d) reducing avoidable hospital admissions.
(3) Arrangements for funding general practice must have regard to the volume, complexity and value of care delivered through general practice.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish, for each financial year, a statement setting out how the arrangements for payments under general medical services contracts are intended to support the matters in subsections (1) to (3).””
This amendment would require sustained investment in general practice reflecting the volume, complexity and value of care provided.
None 51
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 57, line 26, at end insert—
“5A After section 87 insert—
“87A Rural and coastal general practice funding
(1) Arrangements for payments under general medical services contracts must take account of the additional costs of delivering primary medical services in rural and coastal communities.
(2) The factors to which arrangements under subsection (1) must have regard include—
(a) rurality,
(b) the age profile of the population,
(c) transport and travel costs,
(d) seasonal changes in demand,
(e) difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff, and
(f) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated communities.
(3) The Secretary of State must ensure that the funding arrangements under this section are reviewed periodically and amended where necessary to reflect changes in the costs of providing services in rural and coastal areas.””
This amendment would require GP funding to reflect the additional costs of providing services in rural and coastal areas.
None 47
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 60, line 6, at end insert—
“99C Dental training hubs
(1) The Secretary of State must make arrangements for the establishment and support of dental training hubs in areas where there is an unmet need for NHS dental services.
(2) The arrangements under subsection (1) must include provision for dental training hubs in Dorset, including provision in west Dorset.
(3) In exercising the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must work with—
(a) universities and other providers of approved dental education and training,
(b) local authorities, and
(c) integrated care boards and other NHS bodies.
(4) The purpose of dental training hubs is to—
(a) increase the capacity for dental education and training,
(b) increase the availability of NHS dental services in areas of unmet need,
(c) strengthen the recruitment and retention of the dental workforce, and
(d) support the development of the long-term dental workforce.
(5) Arrangements under this section must provide for students in the final year of an approved course of dental education to provide NHS dental treatment under appropriate supervision.
(6) Treatment provided by a student under subsection (5) must—
(a) be NHS treatment carried out on an NHS patient,
(b) be provided under the supervision of a suitably qualified dental professional, and
(c) be free at the point of use to the patient where the supervising provider is receiving, or is entitled to receive, the relevant NHS tariff or other NHS payment in respect of that treatment.
(7) A dental training hub must provide, or participate in, structured pathways into dental apprenticeships and other appropriate employment-based dental training.
(8) Arrangements under this section must include measures to support retention of dental professionals trained through the hubs to meet future workforce commitments.
(9) In this section “dental training hub” means a facility or network of facilities at which dental education, supervised clinical training and NHS dental service provision are integrated.”
This amendment would establish dental training hubs in areas of unmet need, including Dorset and west Dorset, to expand training, improve NHS dental access and strengthen the workforce.
None 48
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 60, line 6, at end insert—
“99C Allocation of NHS dental funding according to unmet need
(1) The Secretary of State must make arrangements to ensure that NHS dental funding is allocated according to local unmet need.
(2) Where funding allocated for primary dental services in a financial year is not used for the purpose for which it was allocated, the Secretary of State must ensure that, so far as reasonably practicable, that funding is redirected to measures designed to increase access to NHS dental services.
(3) Measures under subsection (2) may include—
(a) additional NHS dental capacity,
(b) additional NHS dental appointments,
(c) measures to reduce waiting times,
(d) outreach dentistry,
(e) domiciliary dental services, and
(f) dental services provided in or in connection with schools.
(4) The arrangements must include mechanisms to ensure that funding allocated for the purpose of increasing access results, so far as is reasonably practicable, in additional NHS dental capacity, appointments or reduced waiting times.
(5) In making arrangements under this section, the Secretary of State must have particular regard to people who face barriers to travelling to dental services, including older people, people with disabilities, vulnerable people and schoolchildren.”
This amendment would require dental funding to reflect local unmet need and redirect unused funding towards improving access.
None 49
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 60, line 22, after paragraph 18 insert—
“18A After section 103 insert—
“103A Rural and local-need factors in NHS dental funding
(1) Directions made under section 103 must provide for NHS dental funding arrangements to take account of local need.
(2) In making provision under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have proper regard, in particular, to—
(a) the rurality of the area,
(b) the age profile of the population,
(c) the population who have disabilities
(d) local transport and travel costs,
(e) seasonal changes in demand for services,
(f) difficulties in recruiting and retaining dental professionals, and
(g) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated communities.
(3) Provision made under section 103 must proportionately weight other measures alongside deprivation when determining the level of NHS dental funding required in an area.
(4) The Secretary of State must every three years review and by regulations amend the factors mentioned in subsection (2).””
This amendment would require dental funding to properly take account of rurality, local need, travel costs, workforce challenges and other factors alongside deprivation.
None 56
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 64, line 34, at end insert—
“45A After section 133 insert—
“133A Emergency intervention in pharmaceutical services
(1) Where an integrated care board considers that a person providing pharmaceutical services is failing, or is likely to fail, materially to comply with—
(a) a contractual obligation,
(b) a patient-safety requirement, or
(c) a workforce obligation,
the board must consider whether emergency intervention is required to protect patients or continuity of pharmaceutical services.
(2) Where the board considers that emergency intervention is required, it may—
(a) require the provider to take specified remedial action,
(b) suspend specified arrangements,
(c) terminate arrangements with the provider,
(d) make arrangements with another provider for the provision of pharmaceutical services, or
(e) take any combination of the steps in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(3) The powers in subsection (2) must be exercised with regard to the need to maintain continuity of medicines supply and protect patients from avoidable disruption.
(4) An integrated care board must not continue arrangements with a provider where it is satisfied that the provider is demonstrably unfit to provide pharmaceutical services safely and effectively.
(5) Before exercising a power under subsection (2), the board must, except in an emergency, give the provider a reasonable opportunity to make representations.
(6) Nothing in this section prevents an integrated care board from taking immediate action where delay would materially risk patient safety or continuity of medicines supply.””
This amendment would give integrated care boards powers to intervene where a pharmacy provider is failing to provide their required services to protect patients and medicines supply.
None 57
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 1, page 72, line 40, at end insert—
“(3D) Regulations made under subsection (1) must ensure that the remuneration arrangements for pharmaceutical services take account of the costs of providing those services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
(3E) In making provision under subsection (3D), the determining authority must have regard to—
(a) rurality,
(b) the age profile of the population,
(c) transport and distribution costs,
(d) seasonal changes in demand,
(e) difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff, and
(f) the loss of economies of scale arising from sparsely populated communities.
(3F) The remuneration arrangements must be designed to support the financial sustainability of pharmacies providing essential NHS services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
(3G) The Secretary of State must review the operation of the remuneration arrangements periodically and make such changes as are necessary to ensure that the matters in subsections (3D) to (3F) continue to be reflected.”
This amendment would require pharmacy funding to reflect the additional costs of providing services in rural and sparsely populated areas.
None 54
Edward Morello (LD)Schedule 8, page 106, line 33, at end insert—
“5A After section 254 insert—
“254A Interoperability of health and social care information systems
(1) The Secretary of State must make regulations requiring providers of NHS health services to use interoperable digital information systems.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) must apply, so far as appropriate, to—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) providers of primary dental services,
(c) providers of pharmaceutical services,
(d) NHS trusts,
(e) NHS foundation trusts, and
(f) providers of community health services.
(3) The regulations must provide for the secure exchange of relevant patient information between providers using interoperable systems.
(4) The regulations must include provision for electronic prescribing across NHS care settings where prescribing is clinically appropriate.
(5) The Secretary of State must ensure that the arrangements under this section are designed to—
(a) reduce duplication,
(b) reduce unnecessary administrative work,
(c) improve continuity of care,
(d) reduce avoidable delays in diagnosis, treatment and referral, and
(e) enable clinicians to access relevant information securely when providing care.
(6) Regulations under this section must include appropriate requirements relating to information governance, cyber security, patient confidentiality and the lawful processing of personal data.
(7) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, including representatives of general practice, hospitals, community services and patients.””
This amendment would require interoperable NHS digital systems to improve information sharing, reduce duplication and support continuity of care.
None 41
Martin Wrigley (LD)Schedule 8, page 112, leave out lines 1 and 2 and insert—
“23 For section 274A (Secretary of State’s guidance about NHS England data functions) substitute—
“274A Secretary of State’s guidance in respect of their data functions
(1) The Secretary of State must publish guidance about the exercise of—
(a) their relevant data functions, and
(b) their other functions in connection with their relevant data functions.
(2) Before publishing guidance under this section the Secretary of State must consult any other persons that the Secretary of State considers appropriate in relation to the guidance.
(3) The Secretary of State must have regard to the guidance published under this section.””
This amendment would transfer the existing statutory requirement for published guidance about data functions from NHS England to the Secretary of State.
Opposition Amendment 25
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 112, line 18, leave out Schedule 9
None 46
Ian Roome (LD)Schedule 12, page 151, leave out paragraph 98
This amendment is consequential on NC67.
None 33
Adam Dance (LD)Schedule 12, page 156, line 28, at end insert—
“(c) must publish any evidence the Secretary of State has received in respect of the impact of the proposal.”
Opposition Amendment NC1
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “National Maternity Commissioner (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, appoint a National Maternity Commissioner, situated within the Department of Health and Social Care. (2) The functions of the National Maternity Commissioner are to— (a) oversee NHS maternity services; (b) act as an independent voice for women and families; (c) ensure lessons are learned from identified failures and that the recommendations of maternity reviews are acted upon; (d) promote consistency, safety and accountability across NHS maternity services; and (e) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality and provision of maternity services in England. (3) The person appointed as Commissioner must- (a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role; (b) have first-hand experience of working in maternity services, so far as reasonably possible; and (c) not be a sitting Member of Parliament.”
Opposition Amendment NC2
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Assessment of risks posed by contracts with non-UK based suppliers (1) Within six months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must conduct and lay before Parliament a risk assessment of all contracts between NHS organisations and suppliers based outside of the UK. (2) In conducting an assessment under this section, the Secretary of State must— (a) pay particular regard to contracts which provide technology companies with access to confidential patient data; (b) consult national security experts on the risks posed to UK sovereignty by such contracts; (c) consider risks associated with the sharing of confidential patient data with organisations based outside of the UK; (d) assess public and NHS staff attitudes to relevant suppliers and any implications such attitudes may have on the use and effectiveness of products or services provided under the contract; and (e) consider the background of relevant suppliers, known contracts with other states and organisations, and any relevant ethical considerations. (3) Where any significant risk is identified, the Secretary of State must set out the Government’s intentions to manage and mitigate such risks, including its intention to use or develop domestic technologies, systems or products in place of those provided under the relevant contract.”
Opposition Amendment NC3
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise domestic suppliers In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert— 1CD Duty to prioritise domestic suppliers (1) In exercising functions in relation to the health and care service, the Secretary of State must prioritise the awarding of any contract that will involve the handling of NHS patient data to suppliers based in the United Kingdom. (2) The Secretary of State may only seek to procure technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data from suppliers based outside of the United Kingdom where a viable domestic alternative does not exist. (3) Before signing any contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must consult with— (a) patient groups, (b) national security experts, and (c) staff unions, on the proposed contract and lay a report on such a consultation before Parliament. (4) Where it is proposed to sign a contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must arrange for a motion agreeing to the signing of such a contract to be tabled in each House of Parliament, and no such contract may be signed where a motion for its agreement is negatived by either House of Parliament. (5) If a contract is awarded for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must place a statement before both Houses of Parliament setting out whether the Government is taking, or is planning to take, steps to develop or support long-term domestic alternatives to the systems provided by the contract.”
Opposition Amendment NC4
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy (1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish a strategy (“an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy”) which sets out the Government’s approach to maintaining the security and resilience of relevant NHS information systems by— (a) assessing, managing and mitigating risks— (i) associated with foreign interference, (ii) arising from reliance on foreign-supplied technologies, and (b) preventing over-reliance on foreign providers by building domestic capacity. (2) For the purposes of this section, a “relevant information system” is an information system with access to NHS patient data. (3) An NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy published under this section must— (a) include risks associated with— (i) hardware, (ii) software, (iii) supply chains, and (iv) procurement processes; (b) include a specific focus on security and resilience in digital procurement processes, detailing how the Government intends to reduce strategic dependencies on foreign-owned service providers to mitigate the risk of systemic disruption; (c) include a commitment to prioritise the use of technologies developed in the UK by UK organisations in relevant information systems to reduce reliance on foreign technologies; (d) recommend steps to support and develop sufficient domestic capability where it does not currently exist; (e) where risks are identified, state how the Government intends to address these risks by supporting the use or development of domestic technologies or systems.”
Opposition Amendment NC5
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Health Data Charter (1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passing of this Act, establish an independent body (to be known as the “Sovereign Health Data Trust”) for the purpose of creating a Health Data Charter. (2) The membership of the Trust should include— (a) people with a diverse range of backgrounds; and (b) health data experts, clinicians and patient representatives. (3) The Charter must— (a) set out the fundamental principles and responsibilities for assessing whether a data sharing partnership is in the interest of the public and the NHS; (b) include the primary goal of protecting people’s privacy and their data from exploitation, while promoting trust in data systems and the handling of health data; (c) ensure patients have control of their data, including providing relevant opt-outs; (d) provide that all health data is held anonymously and accessed through a trusted research environment; (e) set out ways to retain and protect the value of health data in England, including providing measures to invest a share of the income generated from new medicines or treatments developed with that health data to be invested back into the NHS; (f) be designed in such a way as to render it interoperable with the European Health Data Space in technical terms, including through the promotion of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles within the NHS. (4) The Sovereign Health Data Trust will— (a) hold continuous oversight of all health data and oversee the trusted research environment; (b) have power to recall or restrict an organisation’s access to data if it has reason to believe that the data is not being used for public or patient benefit; (c) ensure that all data sharing arrangements with a non-NHS organisation are transparent, with all health data contracts entered into by a public body made publicly available; (d) publish detailed minutes of all meetings discussing potential uses of health data; and (e) ensure all health data collection and sharing initiatives are preceded by public consultation, involvement and awareness.”
Opposition Amendment NC6
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Maternity Safety (1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated “good” or “outstanding” by the CQC. (2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passage of this Act, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes— (a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward, (b) one-to-one midwifery care, (c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service, (d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and (e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan. (3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme.”
Opposition Amendment NC7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Healthy life expectancy target (1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must— (a) make regulations to set a statutory target for improving overall healthy life expectancy for the population of Great Britain, and (b) publish a cross-governmental strategy, renewed every 24 months, to set out how the target set by regulations under subsection (1)(a) will be achieved. (2) The strategy under subsection (1)(b) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament. (3) Upon publication of a strategy under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must make a statement before the House of Commons regarding progress made towards the target set by subsection (1)(a).”
Opposition Amendment NC8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Impact of trade deals on the NHS (1) Any trade negotiation which would require NHS spending or funding to exceed £100 million must be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State in the form of regulations subject to the affirmative procedure. (2) Before laying regulations under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment about how the trade negotiation will affect NHS frontline services and patients.”
Opposition Amendment NC9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Powers for coroners and medical examiners to report suspected health system failings (1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, establish a standard mechanism for coroners and medical examiners to refer cases where they suspect failings in the provision of health care. (2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to report (a “duty to whistleblow”) using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings in a health care setting. (3) A referral under this section must be directed to any or all of the following bodies, as the coroner or medical examiner considers appropriate, based on the nature of the suspected failing— (a) the chief officer of police for the relevant police area, (b) the Care Quality Commission, (c) the Department of Health and Social Care, and (d) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body. (4) Regulations under subsection (1) must specify— (a) the information to be included in a referral, (b) the timeframe within which a referral must be made following the formation of a suspicion, and (c) guidance on the criteria for determining to which of the bodies listed in subsection (3) the referral must be directed. (5) A disclosure made in fulfilment of the duty under subsection (2) is a protected disclosure for the purposes of Part 4A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (protection for whistleblowing). (6) The duties imposed by this section are in addition to, and do not affect, a senior coroner’s duty to make a report under paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (reports on action to prevent other deaths).”
Opposition Amendment NC10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Duty of NHS boards to report medical malpractice (1) A member of the board of directors of an NHS trust or an NHS foundation trust in England must report any evidence or reports they have seen of systemic medical malpractice within the trust to— (a) the Care Quality Commission, (b) the Department of Health and Social Care, and (c) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body. (2) The board of directors of an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust in England has a collective duty to— (a) refer the trust to the Care Quality Commission, and (b) alert the Department of Health and Social Care and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body, if staff employed by, or acting on behalf of, the trust raise concerns of systemic medical malpractice. (3) In this section, “systemic medical malpractice” means an action or omission in the provision of health care that falls below the expected standard of care and indicates a widespread, patterned, or recurring failure within the systems, processes, or governance of the trust.”
Opposition Amendment NC11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Duty as respects waiting times for women’s health In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert— “1CD Duty as respects waiting times for women’s health The Secretary of State must exercise functions in relation to the health service with a view to ensuring that average waiting times for the diagnosis and elective treatment of conditions primarily affecting women do not exceed the overall average waiting times for NHS diagnosis and elective treatment.””
Opposition Amendment NC12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Inquiry into women’s health outcomes (1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission an independent inquiry into women’s health provision and outcomes in England. (2) Any inquiry established under subsection (1) must consider— (a) the causes of— (i) poorer health outcomes, and (ii) disparities in patient safety, for women; (b) the effectiveness of existing commissioning arrangements in meeting the needs of women, and (c) recommendations to assist the Secretary of State in discharging the duty to reduce inequalities in health outcomes under section 1C of the National Health Service Act 2006. (3) The Secretary of State must lay a report on the findings of the inquiry before Parliament within the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
Opposition Amendment NC13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Medical Disinformation (1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the Strategy”). (2) The strategy must consider— (a) support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with persons who are anti-vaccine, (b) support for medical professionals and NHS leaders to engage with anti-vaccine councillors or officials in local authorities, (c) investment in public messaging to combat medical disinformation, including engagement with trusted online influencers, (d) outreach campaigns focused on communities who are sceptical about vaccinations, (e) introducing criminal liability for those, including online influencers and politicians, who profit from medical disinformation, (f) a new verification requirement for any social media account claiming to be a medical professional. (3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
Opposition Amendment NC14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Healthwatch funding (1) The Secretary of State, must within 12 months of the passing of this Act, enact a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14. (2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding with inflation for 2026/2027.”
Opposition Amendment NC15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Public Health Committee (1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the passage of this Act to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities. (2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must— (a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership, (b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership, (c) be chaired by the Prime Minister, (d) meet once in each annual quarter. (3) Under subsection 2(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee’s meetings each year. (4) Each government Department must publish an annual report on their department’s consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government Departments. (5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee. (6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
Opposition Amendment NC16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Duty to promote public health All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
Opposition Amendment NC17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing (1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if— (a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and (b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown. (2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
Opposition Amendment NC18
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— “Access to dental provision: Dental deserts (1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a scheme to improve access to dental provision (“the Scheme”). (2) The purpose of the Scheme is to end dental deserts. (3) A dental desert is defined as any local authority area with fewer than ten active dental practices per 100,000 people. (4) The Scheme must make provision to support integrated care boards to— (a) guarantee emergency access to an NHS dentist, (b) provide free dental checks up for— (i) children, (ii) mothers within one year of having given birth, (iii) pregnant women, and (iv) low-income households, (c) guarantee dental appointments for persons commencing— (i) surgery, (ii) chemotherapy, or (iii) transplant procedures. (5) The Secretary of State must, before publishing the Scheme, issue a reformed dental contract. (6) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the establishment of the scheme, publish a dental workforce plan to support delivery of the scheme.”
Opposition Amendment NC20
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— “Cancer Survival Research (1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations establish a Cancer Survival Research Programme. (2) Regulations under this section must— (a) require government co-ordination and funding for research into cancers with a five-year survival rate below 20%, and (b) establish a fellowship programme for foreign academics in cancer research. (3) Any programme established under paragraph 2(b) must make provision to waive visa fees for entry into the UK for participating academics. (4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
Opposition Amendment NC21
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— “GP representation on integrated care boards (1) An integrated care board must include as a member at least one individual who— (a) is a registered medical practitioner, and (b) has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006. (2) In appointing a member under subsection (1) an integrated care board must have regard to the member’s potential contribution to improving— (a) patient journeys across services, (b) coordination and continuity of care, (c) prevention and population health management, and (d) integration of services at neighbourhood level.”
Opposition Amendment NC22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— “Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards (1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to— (a) service redesign, (b) integration of health services, (c) development of neighbourhood health services, and (d) population health planning. (2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes— (a) providers of primary medical services, (b) community pharmacy contractors, (c) providers of primary dental services, and (d) providers of ophthalmic services. (3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes— (a) involvement at an early stage in the development of ICB proposals, (b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in ICB functions, (c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence ICB decision making, and (d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of ICB functions. (4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing— (a) how it has complied with this section, and (b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the ICB. (5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
Opposition Amendment NC23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause— “Duty of care for victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls The Secretary of State and integrated care boards have a duty of care to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.”
None NC81
Chris Hinchliff (Lab)To move the following Clause— "Family support duty following serious childhood diagnosis (1) Where a child is diagnosed with cancer or another life-threatening condition, the responsible NHS provider must, within 14 days of diagnosis, ensure that the child's family is offered appropriate information, support and coordination services. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the responsible NHS provider must offer— (a) access to a named family support coordinator; (b) information regarding welfare benefits, financial support and relevant public services; (c) information regarding employment rights and workplace support available to parents and carers; (d) signposting to appropriate mental health and psychological support services; (e) information regarding relevant local and national charities, support organisations and peer-support services; (f) a written family support plan setting out the support available to the family during treatment; and (g) notification and information sharing in accordance with subsection (3). (3) The responsible NHS provider must provide the child's registered general practitioner and where different, the registered general practitioners of the child's parents or primary carers, with a Family Support Summary. (4) A Family Support Summary must include— (a) the child's diagnosis; (b) the proposed treatment plan; (c) the expected duration and intensity of treatment, where known; (d) information regarding the potential impact of the diagnosis and treatment on parents, carers and siblings; and (e) any recommendations regarding wellbeing support, monitoring or referral for the family unit. (5) Following receipt of a Family Support Summary, the relevant general practice shall be encouraged to consider the wellbeing needs of parents, carers and siblings and, where appropriate, provide information, assessment, referral or signposting to suitable support services. (6) The Secretary of State must publish guidance for NHS providers on the discharge of duties under this section. (7) In this section— "child" means a person under the age of 16; "family" includes parents, guardians, primary carers and siblings; and "life-threatening condition” means a condition designated as such by the Secretary of State in guidance.”
None NC82
Chris Hinchliff (Lab)To move the following Clause— "Parent mental health and bereavement support duty (1) Where a child is diagnosed with a life-threatening condition, the responsible NHS provider must ensure that the psychological wellbeing of parents, guardians, primary carers and siblings is considered as part of the child's care pathway. (2) Within 14 days of diagnosis, the responsible NHS provider must offer— (a) a parental psychological wellbeing assessment; (b) access to a designated family support practitioner, psychologist, counsellor or other appropriately qualified professional; (c) information regarding the psychological impact of serious childhood illness, including trauma, anxiety, depression, stress and bereavement; (d) a written Family Mental Health Support Plan; (e) notification to the child's registered general practitioner and, where different, the registered general practitioners of parents or primary carers. (3) During active treatment, the responsible NHS provider must ensure that parents and primary carers are offered periodic psychological wellbeing reviews. (4) The responsible NHS provider must offer an additional psychological wellbeing review following any— (a) significant deterioration in the child's condition, (b) relapse, (c) progression of disease, (d) transition to palliative care, or (e) other material change in prognosis. (5) The responsible NHS provider must ensure that support under this section is offered proactively and must not be dependent upon a parent, guardian, carer or sibling requesting support, identifying their own need, or making a self-referral. (6) Following the death of a child, the responsible NHS provider must— (a) offer a bereavement wellbeing assessment to parents or primary carers; (b) offer access to bereavement counselling, psychological support or equivalent specialist services; (c) make proactive contact with the family within 14 days of the child's death; (d) offer further follow-up support at intervals specified in guidance issued by NHS England; and (e) ensure that referral pathways are available where significant psychological distress, trauma, anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress symptoms are identified. (7) The responsible NHS provider must ensure that information regarding available support services is provided to siblings and that age-appropriate emotional support pathways are available where required. (8) NHS England must publish guidance regarding— (a) parental psychological wellbeing assessments; (b) family mental health support following serious childhood diagnosis; (c) bereavement support following the death of a child; (d) support for siblings affected by serious childhood illness; (e) referral pathways into specialist mental health services; and (f) minimum standards for proactive family mental health support. (9) NHS England must publish and lay before Parliament an annual report on compliance with this section. (10) In this section— "child" means a person under the age of 16; "family" includes parents, guardians, primary carers and siblings; and "life-threatening condition” means a condition designated by the Secretary of State in regulations. (11) The Secretary of State must, within three years of the commencement of this section, undertake a review of its operation and lay a report before Parliament.”
None NC83
Chris Hinchliff (Lab)To move the following Clause— "Review of uncertain imaging findings in high-risk childhood illness (1) Where imaging undertaken in relation to a child with a high-risk cancer or other life-threatening condition identifies findings that are— (a) inconclusive, (b) indeterminate, or (c) suspicious the responsible NHS provider must ensure that the findings are reviewed by a consultant clinician responsible for the child's care. (2) Following such a review, the responsible NHS provider must ensure that the child's parent, guardian or primary carer is informed— (a) of the nature of the uncertainty identified; (b) whether disease progression, relapse or recurrence can be confidently excluded; (c) what further investigations or surveillance are being considered; and (d) the risks and benefits associated with immediate further imaging, alternative imaging modalities, or continued observation. (3) Where disease progression or relapse cannot be confidently excluded, the responsible NHS provider must consider whether additional imaging or investigation should be undertaken within 14 days or as soon as clinically practicable, whichever is sooner. (4) The outcome of any discussion held under subsection (2), including the views expressed by the child's parent, guardian or primary carer, must be recorded in the child's medical records. (5) NHS England must publish guidance on the operation of this section, including circumstances in which further imaging should be considered following uncertain or indeterminate findings."
None 19
Steff Aquarone (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert— "(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between coastal and inland areas, and (d) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between rural and urban areas."
Opposition Amendment 10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert— "(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
Opposition Amendment 11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert "and (2A)”
Opposition Amendment 15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 51, page 36, line 13, after "behalf” insert “, including nominated carers"
Opposition Amendment 23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert- "(3A) The regulations must make provision for medical markers for firearms licence holders to be visible to all relevant health workers under the establishment of a single patient record. (3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of introducing a statutory requirement for mandatory medical markers for firearms licence holders to be used by those relevant in providing patient care.”
Opposition Amendment 24
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert— "(3A) The regulations must make provision for prior membership in the armed forces to be visible to all relevant healthcare workers under the establishment of a single patient record. (3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of making prior membership in the armed forces visible on the single patient record. (3C) A report under subsection (3B) must consider— (a) the ability of veterans to access the necessary NHS support, and (b) the ability of medical staff to provide former members of the armed forces with appropriate care.”
Opposition Amendment 22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 32, at end insert— "(6A) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a risk assessment on the potential for digital exclusion under the establishment of a single patient record. (6B) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must consult all stakeholders the Secretary of State considers relevant, including patient representation groups. (6C) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must have particular regard for— (a) those without access to a suitable electronic device, (b) those without access to suitable broadband connectivity, (c) those with physical and/or mental disabilities, (d) those belonging to groups considered socially excluded, and (e) those considered lacking digital skills, (6D) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the risk assessment under subsection (6A) before both Houses of Parliament."
Opposition Amendment 1
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 45, line 39, leave out Clause 63
Opposition Amendment 2
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 3, leave out Clause 64
Opposition Amendment 3
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 39, leave out Clause 65
Opposition Amendment 4
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 47, line 36, leave out Clause 66
Opposition Amendment 7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 15, leave out Clause 68
Opposition Amendment 5
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 18, leave out Clause 69
Opposition Amendment 6
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 52, line 34, leave out Clause 75
Opposition Amendment 16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 3, page 88, line 19, at end insert- "(1A) The function under sub-paragraph (1) must be exercised by a person employed in the civil service of the State, and a Minister of the Crown or a special adviser must not be involved in any decision relating to such an appointment, suspension or removal."
Opposition Amendment 13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 106, leave out lines 34 and 35 and insert— "For section 255 (power to request NHS England to establish information systems), substitute— "255 Powers to request the Secretary of State to establish information systems (1) Any person (including a devolved authority) may request the Secretary of State to establish and operate a system for the collection or analysis of information of a description specified in the request. (2) A request may be made under subsection (1) by a person only if the person considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the person to have in relation to the person's exercise of functions, or carrying out of activities, in connection with the provision of health care or adult social care. (3) The Secretary of State must comply with a mandatory request unless the Secretary of State considers that the request relates to information of a description prescribed in regulations. (4) For the purposes of this Chapter a request under subsection (1) is a mandatory request if— (a) it is made by a principal body, and (b) the body considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the body to have in relation to its discharge of a duty in connection with the provision of health services or of adult social care in England. (5) Subsection (6) applies where the Secretary of State has discretion under this section as to whether to comply with— (a) a mandatory request, or (b) other request under subsection (1). (6) In deciding whether to comply with the request, the Secretary of State— (a) must, in particular, consider whether doing so would interfere to an unreasonable extent with the exercise by the Secretary of State of any of its functions, and (b) may take into account the extent to which the principal body or other person making the request has had regard to— (i) the code of practice prepared and published by the Secretary of State under section 263, and (ii) advice or guidance given by the Secretary of State under section 265. (7) In this section “principal body" means— (a) the Care Quality Commission, (b) the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and (c) such other persons as may be prescribed in regulations. (8) In this Chapter "health care” includes all forms of health care whether relating to physical or mental health and also includes procedures that are similar to forms of medical or surgical care but are not provided in connection with a medical condition.””
Opposition Amendment 14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 110, line 37, leave out paragraph 14
Opposition Amendment 12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 9, page 130, line 16, at end insert- "(2A) After paragraph 6(8) insert— "(9) A committee of the Commission is to be appointed in accordance with regulations. (10) The purpose of the committee is to oversee the health services safety investigation functions formerly conducted by HHSIB, transferred to the Care Quality Commission under the Health Act 2026. (11) The committee is to be operationally independent from the Care Quality Commission. (12) The committee is to consist of a chair appointed by the Secretary of State, and not less than six and not more than twelve other members appointed by the chair. (13) A majority of the members of the committee must not be members of the Care Quality Commission. (14) So far as is reasonably practicable, the persons appointed to the committee must include persons with knowledge or experience relevant to the discharge of functions under this paragraph.””
Opposition Amendment 8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 134, line 20, leave out Schedule 10
Opposition Amendment 9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 136, line 1, leave out Schedule 11
Opposition Amendment NC1
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“National Maternity Commissioner
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, appoint a National Maternity Commissioner, situated within the Department of Health and Social Care.
(2) The functions of the National Maternity Commissioner are to—
(a) oversee NHS maternity services;
(b) act as an independent voice for women and families;
(c) ensure lessons are learned from identified failures and that the recommendations of maternity reviews are acted upon;
(d) promote consistency, safety and accountability across NHS maternity services; and
(e) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality and provision of maternity services in England.
(3) The person appointed as Commissioner must—
(a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role;
(b) have first-hand experience of working in maternity services, so far as reasonably possible; and
(c) not be a sitting Member of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to appoint a maternity commissioner within the Department of Health and Social Care to oversee national maternity services.
Opposition Amendment NC2
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Assessment of risks posed by contracts with non-UK based suppliers
(1) Within six months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must conduct and lay before Parliament a risk assessment of all contracts between NHS organisations and suppliers based outside of the UK.
(2) In conducting an assessment under this section, the Secretary of State must –
(a) pay particular regard to contracts which provide technology companies with access to confidential patient data;
(b) consult national security experts on the risks posed to UK sovereignty by such contracts;
(c) consider risks associated with the sharing of confidential patient data with organisations based outside of the UK;
(d) assess public and NHS staff attitudes to relevant suppliers and any implications such attitudes may have on the use and effectiveness of products or services provided under the contract; and
(e) consider the background of relevant suppliers, known contracts with other states and organisations, and any relevant ethical considerations.
(3) Where any significant risk is identified, the Secretary of State must set out the Government’s intentions to manage and mitigate such risks, including its intention to use or develop domestic technologies, systems or products in place of those provided under the relevant contract.”
This new clause would require the government to publish a risk assessment of contracts between NHS organisations and suppliers based outside of the UK.
Opposition Amendment NC3
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise domestic suppliers
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
1CD Duty to prioritise domestic suppliers
(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health and care service, the Secretary of State must prioritise the awarding of any contract that will involve the handling of NHS patient data to suppliers based in the United Kingdom.
(2) The Secretary of State may only seek to procure technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data from suppliers based outside of the United Kingdom where a viable domestic alternative does not exist.
(3) Before signing any contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must consult with –
(a) patient groups,
(b) national security experts, and
(c) staff unions,
on the proposed contract and lay a report on such a consultation before Parliament.
(4) Where it is proposed to sign a contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must arrange for a motion agreeing to the signing of such a contract to be tabled in each House of Parliament, and no such contract may be signed where a motion for its agreement is negatived by either House of Parliament.
(5) If a contract is awarded for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must place a statement before both Houses of Parliament setting out whether the Government is taking, or is planning to take, steps to develop or support long-term domestic alternatives to the systems provided by the contract.”
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise domestic, UK-based, suppliers for technology systems and contracts handling NHS patient data, and places restrictions on the signing of contracts for such systems with non-UK based suppliers.
Opposition Amendment NC4
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish a strategy (“an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy”) which sets out the Government's approach to maintaining the security and resilience of relevant NHS information systems by–
(a) assessing, managing and mitigating risks –
(i) associated with foreign interference,
(ii) arising from reliance on foreign-supplied technologies, and
(b) preventing over-reliance on foreign providers by building domestic capacity.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a “relevant information system” is an information system with access to NHS patient data.
(3) An NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy published under this section must—
(a) include risks associated with—
(i) hardware,
(ii) software,
(iii) supply chains, and
(iv) procurement processes;
(b) include a specific focus on security and resilience in digital procurement processes, detailing how the Government intends to reduce strategic dependencies on foreign-owned service providers to mitigate the risk of systemic disruption;
(c) include a commitment to prioritise the use of technologies developed in the UK by UK organisations in relevant information systems to reduce reliance on foreign technologies;
(d) recommend steps to support and develop sufficient domestic capability where it does not currently exist;
(e) where risks are identified, state how the Government intends to address these risks by supporting the use or development of domestic technologies or systems.”
This new clause would require the Government to publish an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy setting out how it intends to address risks to relevant information systems posed by foreign interference and reliance on foreign technologies, including by supporting the use of domestic technologies.
Opposition Amendment NC5
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Health Data Charter
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passing of this Act, establish an independent body (to be known as the "Sovereign Health Data Trust”) for the purpose of creating a Health Data Charter.
(2) The membership of the Trust should include—
(a) people with a diverse range of backgrounds; and
(b) health data experts, clinicians and patient representatives.
(3) The Charter must—
(a) set out the fundamental principles and responsibilities for assessing whether a data sharing partnership is in the interest of the public and the NHS;
(b) include the primary goal of protecting people’s privacy and their data from exploitation, while promoting trust in data systems and the handling of health data;
(c) ensure patients have control of their data, including providing relevant opt-outs;
(d) provide that all health data is held anonymously and accessed through a trusted research environment;
(e) set out ways to retain and protect the value of health data in England, including providing measures to invest a share of the income generated from new medicines or treatments developed with that health data to be invested back into the NHS;
(f) be designed in such a way as to render it interoperable with the European Health Data Space in technical terms, including through the promotion of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles within the NHS.
(4) The Sovereign Health Data Trust will—
(a) hold continuous oversight of all health data and oversee the trusted research environment;
(b) have power to recall or restrict an organisation’s access to data if it has reason to believe that the data is not being used for public or patient benefit;
(c) ensure that all data sharing arrangements with a non-NHS organisation are transparent, with all health data contracts entered into by a public body made publicly available;
(d) publish detailed minutes of all meetings discussing potential uses of health data; and
(e) ensure all health data collection and sharing initiatives are preceded by public consultation, involvement and awareness.”
Opposition Amendment NC6
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Maternity Safety
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated “good” or
“outstanding” by the CQC.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passage of this Act, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes—
(a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward,
(b) one-to-one midwifery care,
(c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service,
(d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and
(e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan.
(3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme.”
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to create a scheme to ensure that every maternity unit in the country achieves a “good” or “outstanding” rating by the CQC.
Opposition Amendment NC7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthy life expectancy target
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make regulations to set a statutory target for improving overall healthy life expectancy for the population of Great Britain, and
(b) publish a cross-governmental strategy, renewed every 24 months, to set out how the target set by regulations under subsection (1)(a) will be achieved.
(2) The strategy under subsection (1)(b) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
(3) Upon publication of a strategy under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must make a statement before the House of Commons regarding progress made towards the target set by subsection (1)(a).”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations to establish a statutory target for healthy life expectancy in Great Britain and publish a strategy every two years setting out how this target will be achieved.
Opposition Amendment NC8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Impact of trade deals on the NHS
(1) Any trade negotiation which would require NHS spending or funding to exceed £100 million must be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State in the form of regulations subject to the affirmative procedure.
(2) Before laying regulations under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment about how the trade negotiation will affect NHS frontline services and patients.”
This new clause would require any trade negotiation which would require NHS spending or funding to exceed £100 million to be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State in the form of regulations subject to the affirmative procedure.
Opposition Amendment NC9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Powers for coroners and medical examiners to report suspected health system failings
(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, establish a standard mechanism for coroners and medical examiners to refer cases where they suspect failings in the provision of health care.
(2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to report (a "duty to whistleblow") using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings in a health care setting.
(3) A referral under this section must be directed to any or all of the following bodies, as the coroner or medical examiner considers appropriate, based on the nature of the suspected failing—
(a) the chief officer of police for the relevant police area,
(b) the Care Quality Commission,
(c) the Department of Health and Social Care, and
(d) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body.
(4) Regulations under subsection (1) must specify—
(a) the information to be included in a referral,
(b) the timeframe within which a referral must be made following the formation of a suspicion, and
(c) guidance on the criteria for determining to which of the bodies listed in subsection (3) the referral must be directed.
(5) A disclosure made in fulfilment of the duty under subsection (2) is a protected disclosure for the purposes of Part 4A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (protection for whistleblowing).
(6) The duties imposed by this section are in addition to, and do not affect, a senior coroner’s duty to make a report under paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (reports on action to prevent other deaths).”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to create a standardised framework for them to formally refer suspected health system failings (including systemic issues) directly to the police, the CQC, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the HSSIB, with a duty on coroners to participate. It provides legal protection for those making such referrals.
Opposition Amendment NC10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of NHS boards to report medical malpractice
(1) A member of the board of directors of an NHS trust or an NHS foundation trust in England must report any evidence or reports they have seen of systemic medical malpractice within the trust to—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the Department of Health and Social Care, and
(c) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body.
(2) The board of directors of an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust in England has a collective duty to—
(a) refer the trust to the Care Quality Commission, and
(b) alert the Department of Health and Social Care and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body, if staff employed by, or acting on behalf of, the trust raise concerns of systemic medical malpractice.
(3) In this section, “systemic medical malpractice” means an action or omission in the provision of health care that falls below the expected standard of care and indicates a widespread, patterned, or recurring failure within the systems, processes, or governance of the trust.”
This new clause would introduce a mandatory individual duty for members of NHS and Foundation Trust boards to escalate evidence of systemic medical malpractice to the CQC, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the HSSIB. It also imposes a collective duty on the board to formally refer the trust to regulators if staff raise concerns regarding malpractice.
Opposition Amendment NC11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty as respects waiting times for women’s health
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
“1CD Duty as respects waiting times for women's health
The Secretary of State must exercise functions in relation to the health service with a view to ensuring that average waiting times for the diagnosis and elective treatment of conditions primarily affecting women do not exceed the overall average waiting times for NHS diagnosis and elective treatment.””
This new clause would ensure that the average waiting time for diagnosis and treatment for elective conditions for women’s health issues do not exceed the average wait time for wider NHS elective treatment.
Opposition Amendment NC12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Inquiry into women’s health outcomes
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission an independent inquiry into women’s health provision and outcomes in England.
(2) Any inquiry established under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the causes of—
(i) poorer health outcomes, and
(ii) disparities in patient safety,
for women;
(b) the effectiveness of existing commissioning arrangements in meeting the needs of women, and
(c) recommendations to assist the Secretary of State in discharging the duty to reduce inequalities in health outcomes under section 1C of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a report on the findings of the inquiry before Parliament within the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause would establish an inquiry into the poorer health outcomes faced by women.
Opposition Amendment NC13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Disinformation
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the Strategy”).
(2) The strategy must consider—
(a) support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with persons who are anti-vaccine,
(b) support for medical professionals and NHS leaders to engage with anti-vaccine councillors or officials in local authorities,
(c) investment in public messaging to combat medical disinformation, including engagement with trusted online influencers,
(d) outreach campaigns focused on communities who are sceptical about vaccinations,
(e) introducing criminal liability for those, including online influencers and politicians, who profit from medical disinformation,
(f) a new verification requirement for any social media account claiming to be a medical professional.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to combat anti-vaccine and medical disinformation.
Opposition Amendment NC14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthwatch funding
(1) The Secretary of State, must within 12 months of the passing of this Act, enact a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
(2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding with inflation for 2026/2027.”
This new clause would ensure that Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations are funded to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
Opposition Amendment NC15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Public Health Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the passage of this Act to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities.
(2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must—
(a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership,
(b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership,
(c) be chaired by the Prime Minister,
(d) meet once in each annual quarter.
(3) Under subsection 2(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee's meetings each year.
(4) Each government Department must publish an annual report on their department's consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government Departments.
(5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee.
(6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
This new clause would establish a Public Health Committee and Health Creation Unit to promote public health and cross-government policy making.
Opposition Amendment NC16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote public health
All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
This new clause will place a duty on all ministers to consider health outcomes and the promotion of public health when exercising their duties.
Opposition Amendment NC17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing
(1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if—
(a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and
(b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
(2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
This new clause would require the Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing to be brought before the House for a vote.
Opposition Amendment NC18
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Access to dental provision: Dental deserts
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a scheme to improve access to dental provision (“the Scheme”).
(2) The purpose of the Scheme is to end dental deserts.
(3) A dental desert is defined as any local authority area with fewer than ten active dental practices per 100,000 people.
(4) The Scheme must make provision to support integrated care boards to—
(a) guarantee emergency access to an NHS dentist,
(b) provide free dental checks up for—
(i) children,
(ii) mothers within one year of having given birth,
(iii) pregnant women, and
(iv) low-income households,
(c) guarantee dental appointments for persons commencing—
(i) surgery,
(ii) chemotherapy, or
(iii) transplant procedures.
(5) The Secretary of State must, before publishing the Scheme, issue a reformed dental contract.
(6) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the establishment of the scheme, publish a dental workforce plan to support delivery of the scheme.”
This new clause would establish a scheme to support integrated care boards to end dental deserts.
Opposition Amendment NC19
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Cancer treatment: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral.
(2) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme to support NHS hospital trusts in meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(3) As part of the Scheme, the Secretary of State must expand the capacity of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
(4) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to Parliament on progress on meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(5) Any statement made under subsection (4) should be made as close as reasonably practicable to 4 February.”
This new clause gives patients a right to start cancer treatment within 62 days of referral and requires the Secretary of State to establish a scheme to deliver this. It also requires the Secretary of State to update the House on progress against the target on/around the time of World Cancer Day.
Opposition Amendment NC20
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Cancer Survival Research
(1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations establish a Cancer Survival Research Programme.
(2) Regulations under this section must—
(a) require government co-ordination and funding for research into cancers with a five-year survival rate below 20%, and
(b) establish a fellowship programme for foreign academics in cancer research.
(3) Any programme established under paragraph 2(b) must make provision to waive visa fees for entry into the UK for participating academics.
(4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to introduce regulations requiring the government to coordinate research into cancers with the lowest survival rate.
Opposition Amendment NC21
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“GP representation on integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must include as a member at least one individual who—
(a) is a registered medical practitioner, and
(b) has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(2) In appointing a member under subsection (1) an integrated care board must have regard to the member’s potential contribution to improving—
(a) patient journeys across services,
(b) coordination and continuity of care,
(c) prevention and population health management, and
(d) integration of services at neighbourhood level.”
This new clause would ensure that each integrated care board includes at least one member who is a registered medical practitioner, and has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
Opposition Amendment NC22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to—
(a) service redesign,
(b) integration of health services,
(c) development of neighbourhood health services, and
(d) population health planning.
(2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) community pharmacy contractors,
(c) providers of primary dental services, and
(d) providers of ophthalmic services.
(3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes—
(a) involvement at an early stage in the development of ICB proposals,
(b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in ICB functions,
(c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence ICB decision making, and
(d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of ICB functions.
(4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing—
(a) how it has complied with this section, and
(b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the ICB.
(5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This new clause ensures a certain range of primary care providers are consulted by integrated care boards in the development of their healthcare plans.
Opposition Amendment NC23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of care for victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls
The Secretary of State and integrated care boards have a duty of care to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.”
This new clause would place a duty of care on the Secretary of State and integrated care boards to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.
None 19
Steff Aquarone (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between coastal and inland areas, and
(d) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between rural and urban areas.”
This amendment would create a duty for the Secretary of State to reduce inequalities between coastal and inland areas and rural and urban areas.
Opposition Amendment 10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would place the original mental health investment standard on a statutory footing, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on Primary Care services.
(2B) The increase in spending set out in subsection (2B) must be in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would introduce the primary care Investment standard, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on primary care services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 20
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on Primary Care services.
(2B) The increase in spending set out in subsection 2B must be in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would introduce the primary care Investment standard, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on primacy health services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 10 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on mental health services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 18
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A) and (2B)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 17 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on primary care services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 21
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A) and (2B)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 20 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on primary care services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
Opposition Amendment 15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 51, page 36, line 13, after “behalf” insert “, including nominated carers”
This amendment makes it explicit that nominated carers can access the single patient record on behalf of those they care for.
Opposition Amendment 23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) The regulations must make provision for medical markers for firearms licence holders to be visible to all relevant health workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
(3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of introducing a statutory requirement for mandatory medical markers for firearms licence holders to be used by those relevant in providing patient care.”
This amendment would require medical markers for firearms licence holders to be visible to all relevant health workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
Opposition Amendment 24
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) The regulations must make provision for prior membership in the armed forces to be visible to all relevant healthcare workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
(3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of making prior membership in the armed forces visible on the single patient record.
(3C) A report under subsection (3B) must consider—
(a) the ability of veterans to access the necessary NHS support, and
(b) the ability of medical staff to provide former members of the armed forces with appropriate care.”
This amendment would require prior membership in the armed forces to be visible to all relevant healthcare workers under the establishment of a single patient record and require the Secretary of State to publish a report on making prior membership in the armed forces visible on the single patient record.
Opposition Amendment 22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 32, at end insert—
“(6A) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a risk assessment on the potential for digital exclusion under the establishment of a single patient record.
(6B) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must consult all stakeholders the Secretary of State considers relevant, including patient representation groups.
(6C) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must have particular regard for—
(a) those without access to a suitable electronic device,
(b) those without access to suitable broadband connectivity,
(c) those with physical and/or mental disabilities,
(d) those belonging to groups considered socially excluded, and
(e) those considered lacking digital skills.
(6D) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the risk assessment under subsection (6A) before both Houses of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a risk assessment on the potential for digital exclusion under the establishment of single patient record.
Opposition Amendment 1
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 45, line 39, leave out Clause 63
Opposition Amendment 2
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 3, leave out Clause 64
Opposition Amendment 3
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 39, leave out Clause 65
Opposition Amendment 4
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 47, line 36, leave out Clause 66
Opposition Amendment 7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 15, leave out Clause 68
This amendment removes the clause abolishing Healthwatch England.
Opposition Amendment 5
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 18, leave out Clause 69
Opposition Amendment 6
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 52, line 34, leave out Clause 75
Opposition Amendment 16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 3, page 88, line 19, at end insert—
“(1A) The function under sub-paragraph (1) must be exercised by a person employed in the civil service of the State, and a Minister of the Crown or a special adviser must not be involved in any decision relating to such an appointment, suspension or removal.”
This amendment would ensure that civil servants are responsible for the decision making and appointment processes for trust and ICB leaders, rather than Ministers or Special Advisers.
Opposition Amendment 13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 106, leave out lines 34 and 35 and insert—
“For section 255 (power to request NHS England to establish information systems), substitute—
“255 Powers to request the Secretary of State to establish information systems
(1) Any person (including a devolved authority) may request the Secretary of State to establish and operate a system for the collection or analysis of information of a description specified in the request.
(2) A request may be made under subsection (1) by a person only if the person considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the person to have in relation to the person's exercise of functions, or carrying out of activities, in connection with the provision of health care or adult social care.
(3) The Secretary of State must comply with a mandatory request unless the Secretary of State considers that the request relates to information of a description prescribed in regulations.
(4) For the purposes of this Chapter a request under subsection (1) is a mandatory request if—
(a) it is made by a principal body, and
(b) the body considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the body to have in relation to its discharge of a duty in connection with the provision of health services or of adult social care in England.
(5) Subsection (6) applies where the Secretary of State has discretion under this section as to whether to comply with—
(a) a mandatory request, or
(b) other request under subsection (1).
(6) In deciding whether to comply with the request, the Secretary of State —
(a) must, in particular, consider whether doing so would interfere to an unreasonable extent with the exercise by the Secretary of State of any of its functions, and
(b) may take into account the extent to which the principal body or other person making the request has had regard to—
(i) the code of practice prepared and published by the Secretary of State under section 263, and
(ii) advice or guidance given by the Secretary of State under section 265.
(7) In this section “principal body” means—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and
(c) such other persons as may be prescribed in regulations.
(8) In this Chapter “health care” includes all forms of health care whether relating to physical or mental health and also includes procedures that are similar to forms of medical or surgical care but are not provided in connection with a medical condition.””
This amendment would enable the Care Quality Commission and NICE to continue to make mandatory requests to the Secretary of State to establish an information system, following the transfer of NHS England’s functions.
Opposition Amendment 14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 110, line 37, leave out paragraph 14
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 13.
Opposition Amendment 12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 9, page 130, line 16, at end insert—
“(2A) After paragraph 6(8) insert—
“(9) A committee of the Commission is to be appointed in accordance with regulations.
(10) The purpose of the committee is to oversee the health services safety investigation functions formerly conducted by HHSIB, transferred to the Care Quality Commission under the Health Act 2026.
(11) The committee is to be operationally independent from the Care Quality Commission.
(12) The committee is to consist of a chair appointed by the Secretary of State, and not less than six and not more than twelve other members appointed by the chair.
(13) A majority of the members of the committee must not be members of the Care Quality Commission.
(14) So far as is reasonably practicable, the persons appointed to the committee must include persons with knowledge or experience relevant to the discharge of functions under this paragraph.””
This amendment would ensure that oversight of HSSIB’s functions would remain operationally independent of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) following the transfer of its functions to the CQC.
Opposition Amendment 8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 134, line 20, leave out Schedule 10
This amendment removes the schedule abolishing Healthwatch England.
Opposition Amendment 9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 136, line 1, leave out Schedule 11
This amendment removes the schedule abolishing Local Healthwatch organisations.
Opposition Amendment NC112
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Armed Forces Covenant Duty Reporting
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the extent to which the duty for due regard for health and social care matters under the Armed Forces Covenant established by the Armed Forces Act 2006 has been met.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of—
(a) the extent to which the health and social care needs of the armed forces community are being embedded in health and social care guidance, workforce training, and professional standards in the NHS,
(b) the impact of national schemes such as—
(i) the Veteran-Aware Trust accreditation,
(ii) the Veteran-Friendly GP Accreditation Scheme, and
(iii) the National Armed Forces Training and Education Programme on the provision of health and social care for the armed forces community,
(c) collaboration between devolved administrations and the Department for Health and Social Care regarding the delivery of health and social care for the armed forces community, and
(d) provision for data collection on the armed forces community's access to and experience of NHS health and social care.
(3) The report under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the extent to which the duty for due regard for health and social care matters under the Armed Forces Covenant established by the Armed Forces Act 2006 has been met.
None NC113
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme (No. 2)
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 4, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen,
(b) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or
(c) have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and
(d) hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens, people with indefinite leave to remain, or settled status who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
Opposition Amendment NC110
James MacCleary (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Defence)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans
(1) Each integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to improving and maintaining the physical health, mental health, and wellbeing of armed forces veterans within its area.
(2) In exercising its duties under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) reduction of health inequalities experienced by veterans,
(b) prevention of deterioration in veterans’ physical and/or mental health,
(c) the need to ensure veterans are able to access appropriate preventative and other health services and support.
(3) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area provide veterans with information about support available to them for their health and wellbeing.
(4) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan under section 24 of the Health Act 2026 an integrated care board must include—
(a) an assessment of the health and wellbeing needs of veterans within its area,
(b) steps the integrated care board proposes to take to improve outcomes for veterans, and
(c) measures for reducing inequalities experienced by veterans.””
This new clause would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans.
Opposition Amendment NC111
James MacCleary (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Defence)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to provide medical records on discharge from the armed forces
(1) This section applies where a person ceases to be a member of the regular forces or the reserve forces.
(2) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for a complete copy of the person’s service medical records to be provided to the person no later than one month after the day on which the person is discharged or otherwise ceases to be a member of those forces.
(3) Those regulations may specify the manner and form in which service medical records are to be provided under this section, including provision for records to be transferred directly to a civilian health body with the person's consent.
(4) In this section—
“health body” means—
(a) in relation to England—
(i) NHS England;
(ii) an integrated care board established under section 14Z25 of the National Health Service Act 2006;
(iii) a National Health Service trust in England;
(iv) an NHS foundation trust;
(v) primary care providers;
(b) in relation to Wales—
(i) a Local Health Board established under section 11 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006;
(ii) a Special Health Authority established under section 22 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006, other than a cross-border Special Health Authority;
(iii) a National Health Service trust in Wales;
(iv) primary care providers;
(c) in relation to Scotland—
(i) a Health Board constituted under section 2 of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978;
(ii) a Special Health Board constituted under section 2 of that Act;
(iii) the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service;
(iv) primary care providers;
(d) in relation to Northern Ireland—
(i) a Local Commissioning Group appointed under section 9 of the Health and Social Care (Reform) Act (Northern Ireland) 2009 (c. 1 (N.I.));
(ii) a Health and Social Care trust established by virtue of Article 10 of the Health and Personal Social Services (Northern Ireland) Order 1991 (S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1)), other than the Northern Ireland Ambulance Service Health and Social Care Trust.
(iii) primary care providers;
(5) For the purposes of this section, “service medical records” means any records relating to the person’s physical or mental health care and treatment created or maintained by or on behalf of His Majesty's forces during the person's period of service.”
This new clause places a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that all service personnel leaving the military receive a complete copy of their medical records within one month of their discharge date.
Opposition Amendment NC109
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Hospices revenue funding The Secretary of State must ensure that any funding for hospices is allocated for three-year periods.”
Opposition Amendment NC108
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to collect information: Deaths awaiting palliative care
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to collect information: Deaths awaiting palliative care
(1) Each integrated care board must collect data on the number of patients who died while waiting for end-of-life care.
(2) Data under subsection (1) must be held anonymised and published by the Department of Health and Social Care.””
This new clause would place a duty on ICBs to collect and publish data on the number of patients who died while waiting for end-of-life care.
None NC107
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“NICE technology appraisal recommendation: penalty scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must establish by regulations a penalty scheme relating to the implementation of NICE technology appraisal recommendations (the "scheme").
(2) Under the scheme, Health and Social Care bodies must implement a NICE technology appraisal recommendation within three months of receiving such a recommendation.
(3) Any Health and Social Care body that fails to meet the requirement set out in subsection (2) is liable to a penalty as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations.
(4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
Opposition Amendment NC76
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing
(1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if—
(a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and
(b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
(2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
This new clause would require the Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing to be brought before the House for a vote.
Opposition Amendment NC77
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Disinformation
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the Strategy”).
(2) The strategy must consider—
(a) support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with persons who are anti-vaccine,
(b) support for medical professionals and NHS leaders to engage with anti-vaccine councillors or officials in local authorities,
(c) investment in public messaging to combat medical disinformation, including engagement with trusted online influencers,
(d) outreach campaigns focused on communities who are sceptical about vaccinations,
(e) introducing criminal liability for those, including online influencers and politicians, who profit from medical disinformation, and
(f) a new verification requirement for any social media account claiming to be a medical professional.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to combat anti-vaccine and medical disinformation.
Opposition Amendment NC78
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthwatch funding
(1) The Secretary of State, must within 12 months of the passing of this act, enact a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
(2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding with inflation for 2026/2027.”
This new clause would ensure that Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations are funded to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
Opposition Amendment NC79
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Public Health Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the passage of this Act to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities.
(2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must—
(a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership,
(b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership,
(c) be chaired by the Prime Minister, and
(d) meet once in each annual quarter.
(3) Under subsection 2(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee's meetings each year.
(4) Each government Department must publish an annual report on their department's consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government Departments.
(5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee.
(6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
This new clause would establish a Public Health Committee and Health Creation Unit to promote public health and cross-government policy making.
Opposition Amendment NC80
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote public health
All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
This new clause will place a duty on all ministers to consider health outcomes and the promotion of public health when exercising their duties.
Opposition Amendment NC81
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Minimum service levels
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision for minimum service levels to operate in the NHS during periods of strike action.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) may repeal or otherwise amend provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025, insofar as is necessary for the purposes of this section.
(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must include provision for minimum levels of service by categories of NHS workforce staff, including all Agenda for Change staff but not resident doctors.
(4) Regulations under subsection (1) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) When minimum service levels are in operation under this section, the NHS must set minimum standards of acceptable service to be provided by the NHS during periods of strike action, including mitigating any effect on appointments, medical procedures, acute services, midwifery, surgical procedures, and any other matters that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.
(6) With one year beginning on the day on which regulations are made under subsection (1), and within each period of a year thereafter, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on compliance with minimum service levels, including reasons for any failure by operators to secure the required thresholds, and actions the NHS is taking to improve performance to meet the minimum service levels.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations which create minimum service levels to operate in the NHS during periods of strike action.
Opposition Amendment NC82
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Strike action
(1) It is an offence for medical practitioners to undertake strike action.
(2) The Secretary of State may repeal or otherwise amend provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025, insofar as is necessary for the purposes of this section.”
This new clause would make it illegal for doctors to go on strike.
Opposition Amendment NC83
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Exemption from the Public Sector Equality Duty
(1) Any organisation in receipt of public funding to provide health or social care services in England is exempt from the Public Sector Equality Duty (Chapter 1 of the Equality Act 2010) in respect of the provision of those services.
(2) The Secretary of State may make any regulations necessary to amend any other enactment as a consequence of subsection (1).”
This new clause would exempt health and social care services in England from the Public Sector Equality Duty.
Opposition Amendment NC84
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Publication of data on avoidable deaths
(1) The Secretary of State must publish every quarter the number of avoidable deaths attributed to waits of more than 12 hours in accident and emergency departments.
(2) The Secretary of State must make the data under subsection (1) available by integrated care board area.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish data on avoidable deaths caused by waits over 12 hours in A&E departments.
Opposition Amendment NC85
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Patient safety recommendations: Government response
(1) This section applies where the Secretary of State commissions a review or a report into a patient safety issue.
(2) The Secretary of State must—
(a) decide within six months whether they are going to implement each recommendation;
(b) publish a response to each recommendation with a clear statement of whether the recommendation is to be implemented; and
(c) publish a timeline for implementation of those recommendations which they have decided to implement.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to respond to patient safety recommendations.
Opposition Amendment NC86
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Referrals by general practitioners
NHS Trusts and NHS Foundation Trusts must ensure that all general practitioners are able to directly refer patients to consultants.”
This new clause would ensure that GPs must be able to refer patients directly to consultants.
Opposition Amendment NC87
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 4, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen, and
(b) hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
Opposition Amendment NC88
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“National strategy on sexual health
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a national strategy on sexual health.
(2) In preparing a strategy under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must consult all stakeholders the Secretary of State considers relevant, including patient representation groups.
(3) A strategy under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the adequacy of current funding channels,
(b) equitable access to sexual healthcare services,
(c) sexual health inequalities, and
(d) the adequacy of sexually transmitted diseases test provision.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the national strategy under subsection (1) before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a national strategy on the accessibility of sexual healthcare.
None NC89
Anna Dixon (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of health bodies to provide information and advice to carers
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must make provision for an information and support service for unpaid carers.
(2) The service under subsection (1) must include—
(a) provision for an unpaid carer to access information regarding recommended care and treatment needs for the person for whom they are caring,
(b) information about services, support and assistance available from the National Health Service to assist unpaid carers in their caring role,
(c) information about the availability of support for unpaid carers provided by local authorities,
(d) information about support available to promote and maintain the health, wellbeing and resilience of unpaid carers,
(e) information about arrangements for obtaining advice, training, advocacy or peer support relevant to unpaid carers’ caring role, and
(f) any other provisions which the Secretary of State considers appropriate for supporting unpaid carers in relation to their delivery of care.
(3) In exercising the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must prioritise proactive identification of unpaid carers and ensuring that information and advice is accessible, proportionate and appropriate to the needs of unpaid carers.
(4) In exercising the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to an unpaid carer’s willingness and ability to provide care.
(5) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to ensure that unpaid carers are made aware of the information and advice available under this section.
(6) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” has the meaning given to “carer” in section 10 of the Care Act 2014.”
This new clause would create a duty for the Secretary of State to provide certain information and advice to unpaid carers.
None NC90
Anna Dixon (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on integration of health and social care services
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament about options for strengthening the integration of health and social care in England.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider the integration of health and social care in terms of commissioning—
(a) between local authorities and the NHS, and
(b) between healthcare and social care providers.
(3) Within six months of the report under subsection (1) being laid, the Secretary of State must make provision to implement the option for integration in the report which the Secretary of State considers most appropriate.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to lay a report before both Houses of Parliament about options for strengthening the integration of health and social care in England.
Government Amendment NC91
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Regulations: reference to agreements and standards
(1) The Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 2 (power to make regulations about human medicines), after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) Regulations under subsection (1) making provision in reliance on section 3, 4, 5 or 7 may refer to international agreements or standards relating to human medicines, including agreements or standards as they have effect from time to time.”
(3) In section 16 (manufacture, marketing and supply), after subsection (2) insert—
“(3) Provision made in reliance on subsection (1)(a) may refer to United Kingdom standards that—
(a) relate to the marketing, putting into service or other supply of medical devices, and
(b) are specified in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time.
(4) Regulations made under section 15(1) that contain provision made in reliance on subsection (1)(a) about relevant requirements (or exceptions from them) may include provision in relation to a medical device where—
(a) the device complies with regulatory requirements applicable somewhere outside the United Kingdom which is specified in regulations, and
(b) a description of the device and the regulatory requirements applicable to it are contained in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time.
(5) In this section “United Kingdom standard” means a standard that is—
(a) set by the British Standards Institution, or
(b) primarily developed for use in the United Kingdom, or part of the United Kingdom.””
This new clause would amend the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 to (a) enable regulations to refer to both international agreements and standards and standards developed in the United Kingdom and (b) enable the Secretary of State to dispense with requirements placed on devices which meet regulatory requirements applicable outside the United Kingdom.
Government Amendment NC92
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements
(1) The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/618) are amended as follows.
(2) For regulation 1A (Schedules) substitute—
“1A Schedule
Schedule 2A has effect.”
(3) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (1)—
(a) in the definition of “mutual recognition agreement”, in paragraph (a), for “country listed in Schedule 2” substitute “country specified in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time”;
(b) in the definition of “third country conformity assessment body”, for “established in a country which is listed in Schedule 2 and designated in accordance with a relevant” substitute “designated in accordance with a”.
(4) Omit Schedule 2 (mutual recognition agreements).”
This new clause would amend the definition of “mutual recognition agreement” in the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (as it has effect in England and Wales, and Scotland) so that agreements are defined by a list published by the Secretary of State, rather than a Schedule to the regulations.
Government Amendment NC93
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Consultation about medicines and medical devices regulations
(1) Section 45 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (consultation) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), for “a provision of Part 1, 2, 3 or 4” substitute “Part 1 or 3”.
(3) After subsection (1) insert—
“(1ZA) Before making regulations under Part 2 or 4 the relevant authority must—
(a) carry out a public consultation, or
(b) consult such persons as it considers appropriate.”
(4) In subsection (3), at the beginning insert “Where a public consultation is carried out”.
(5) In subsection (4), in the words before paragraph (a), for “subsection (1)” substitute “subsection (1ZA)”.”
This amends the duty to consult in relation to regulations about human medicines and medical devices. It gives the option of consulting such persons as the relevant authority considers appropriate instead of a public consultation.
Government Amendment NC94
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medicines and medical devices regulations: parliamentary procedure
In section 47 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (regulations: procedure), for subsection (3) substitute—
“(3) Regulations under Part 1 are subject to the draft affirmative procedure.
(3A) Regulations under Part 2—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision of one or more of the following descriptions—
(i) provision made in reliance on section 6(1)(a) (fees);
(ii) provision amending the meaning of “appropriate practitioner” or “approved country health professional” for the purposes of Part 12 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (see regulation 214 of those regulations);
(iii) provision amending any of the following provisions of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012—
• regulations 217C(3) or 217CA(3) (original pack dispensing for products containing relevant substances: definition of “relevant substance”),
• Schedule 13 (prescription only medicines for which community practitioner nurse prescribers are appropriate practitioners),
• Schedule 15 (requirements for specific products subject to general sale),
• Schedule 16 (patient group directions and vaccine group directions),
• Schedule 17 (exemption for sale, supply or administration by certain persons),
• Schedule 18 (substances that may not be sold or supplied by a pharmacist without a prescription in reliance on emergency provisions),
• Schedule 19 (medicinal products for parenteral administration in an emergency), or
• Schedule 21 (medicinal products at high dilutions);
(iv) provision amending regulation 250 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (restrictions on persons to be supplied with medicinal products: exceptions) for the purpose of changing the products to which any exception from time to time provided for by that regulation applies;
(v) provision that is consequential on provision of a description mentioned in any of sub-paragraphs (ii) to (iv);
(b) are subject to the made affirmative procedure if they—
(i) contain only provision that is made in reliance on section 7 (emergencies),
(ii) contain a declaration that the person making them considers that they need to be made urgently to protect the public from an imminent risk of serious harm to health, and
(iii) are not within paragraph (a);
(c) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within sub-paragraphs (a) or (b).
(3B) Regulations under Part 3—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision made in reliance on section 12(1)(a) (fees), and
(b) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a).
(3C) Regulations under Part 4—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision of one or more of the following descriptions—
(i) provision made in reliance on—
• section 17(1)(a) (fees), or
• paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 (supplementary provision about civil sanctions);
(ii) provision amending or revoking regulation 1ZA of the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (expiry of certain provisions) or consequential on such provision;
(b) are subject to the made affirmative procedure if they—
(i) contain only provision made in reliance on section 18 (emergencies), and
(ii) contain a declaration that the person making them considers that they need to be made urgently to protect the public from an imminent risk of serious harm to health;
(c) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a) or (b).””
This changes the parliamentary procedure for certain regulations from the draft affirmative procedure to the negative procedure. The changes all relate to regulations about medicines and medical devices (although the procedural provisions relating to certain other matters are restated in the amendment).
Government Amendment NC95
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical devices etc: parliamentary procedure for certain fees regulations
In Schedule 7 to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (regulations), in paragraph 12—
(a) in sub-paragraph (1) for “relate to altering the amount of a fee or charge to reflect changes in the value of money” substitute “fall within sub-paragraph (1A)”.
(b) after sub-paragraph (1) insert—
(1A)Provision falls within this sub-paragraph if it relates to—
(a)altering the amount of a fee or charge to reflect changes in the value of money,
(b)altering the amount of a fee or charge to be charged in connection with the exercise of a function which a public authority has by virtue of provision made under section 8C in connection with the EU medical devices Regulations, or
(c)altering the amount of a fee or charge to be charged under the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/50).
(1B)In sub-paragraph (1A)(b) “the EU medical devices Regulations” means—
(a)Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC, or
(b)Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU,
as they have effect from time to time by virtue of Article 5(4) of the Windsor Framework.””
This allows regulations altering certain fees in relation to medical devices etc to be made subject to the negative resolution procedure. At the moment those regulations are subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
None NC96
Jim Dickson (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on dementia care
(1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia.
(b) the provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must have regard to—
(a) any targets or standards set out in a national plan, guidance, or framework relating to dementia services, and
(b) any other information the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) A report under subsection (1) must include—
(a) an assessment of variation in dementia services and outcomes between Integrated Care Board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers of dementia patients,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the provision of NHS care and social care in relation to dementia.
Government Amendment 83
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 11, page 191, line 35, at end insert—
“Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026
400 In Schedule 1 to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (relevant authorities)—
(a) omit paragraph 9;
(b) in paragraph 12, omit
“section 25 of”
.”
This is a consequential amendment to Schedule 1 to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026, which would remove a reference to NHS England and update a reference to NHS trusts to take account of the new conversion procedure created by clause 35 of the Bill.
None NC97
Joe Robertson (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Publication of annual dementia care report
(1) The Secretary of State must publish annually and lay before Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia, and
(b) provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) In preparation of the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to targets, standards and outcome measures set out in national plans, guidance and frameworks relating to dementia services.
(3) In preparation of the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State may have regard to any such measures or information that they consider appropriate, including—
(a) an assessment of any variation in dementia services and outcomes between integrated care board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish the first such report under subsection (1) within 12 months of the passage of this Act.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to produce an annual report on the delivery of dementia care by the NHS and social care sectors against relevant national targets, standards and outcome measures.
Opposition Amendment NC98
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Response to the Hughes Report: options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh
The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report within 30 days of this Act being passed.
Opposition Amendment NC99
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1, at end insert—
“(2) Applicants eligible under this section shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(3) In section 2, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(4) In section 3, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.””
This new clause would create a requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors.
Opposition Amendment NC100
Joshua Reynolds (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Investment and Trade)To move the following Clause—
“Single patient record: review of flagging for early cancer diagnosis
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on the feasibility of using patient records held by the health service to indicate, to a person providing health care to a patient, cases in which a patient has presented symptoms on more than one occasion which may indicate the presence of cancer.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the potential for such indication to support early diagnosis of cancer in patients aged under 50 years of age, and
(b) any implications of such an indication requirement for clinical responsibility and patient safety.
(3) In preparing the report the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) NICE, and
(b) any other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to report on the feasibility of using patient records held by the health service to indicate, to a person providing health care to a patient, cases in which a patient has presented symptoms on more than one occasion which may indicate the presence of cancer.
Opposition Amendment NC101
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Plan to manage acquired brain injury
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a plan for the management of acquired brain injury across England.
(2) A plan under subsection (1) must include but shall not be limited to—
(a) proposed government actions to prevent acquired brain injuries;
(b) proposed government actions to improve acute treatment for acquired brain injuries;
(c) a statement of priorities regarding the Secretary of State’s approach for rehabilitation and long-term support for persons with acquired brain injuries across public services delivered by—
(i) the Department for Health,
(ii) the Department for Education, and
(iii) the Ministry of Justice;
(d) proposals for data sharing between government departments, health care, and rehabilitation providers to improve patient—
(i) identification,
(ii) care,
(iii) support;
(e) a commitment providing 95% of people with complex needs with a personalised care plan by 2027;
(f) commitments for research into acquired brain injuries in sport;
(g) any proposed use of directions, guidance, financial assistance, incentives or other mechanisms to secure delivery of the plan’s objectives;
(h) workforce, diagnostic, digital and data requirements for implementation of the plan; and
(i) arrangements for monitoring, publishing and reporting progress against the plan.
(3) The plan under subsection (1) must be laid by the Secretary of State before both Houses of Parliament.
(4) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of publishing a plan under subsection (1), and every 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report on progress made against the proposals and commitments in the plan.”
This new clause would require the Government to publish their action plan to manage acquired brain injury within 30 days of the passing of this Act.
Opposition Amendment NC102
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Response to the Hughes Report: options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh
The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report within 30 days of this Act being passed.
Opposition Amendment NC103
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1, at end insert—
“(2) Applicants eligible under this section shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(3) In section 2, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(4) In section 3, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.””
This new clause would create a requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
Opposition Amendment NC104
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Implementation of the Women's Health Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 90 days of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, publish a women's health implementation plan (the "implementation plan") setting out how the commitments in the document entitled "The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England" published on 15 April 2026 (or any successor document) will be delivered.
(2) The implementation plan must include, in particular—
(a) a timetable for delivering simpler access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC);
(b) a trajectory for reducing the gynaecology waiting list and for reducing average diagnosis times for endometriosis;
(c) a plan for establishing the regional specialist centres for group-based women's health pathways, including contraception, heavy periods, uro-gynaecology and menopause; and
(d) measurable targets and milestones for each commitment in the strategy, including a baseline and timetable for delivery.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay the implementation plan before Parliament on the day it is published.
(4) In preparing the implementation plan, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
(b) the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, and
(c) patient organisations representing women affected by the conditions addressed by the strategy.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a women's health implementation plan setting out how the commitments in the document entitled "The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England will be delivered.
Opposition Amendment NC105
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Self-care and health literacy in neighbourhood health plans
(1) Guidance issued by the Secretary of State under section 14Z58 of the National Health Service Act 2006 as amended by section 24(4) of this Act (neighbourhood health plan) must require that every neighbourhood health plan includes arrangements for—
(a) supporting self-care and self-management, including by enabling people to manage minor and long-term conditions, and conditions that are self-limiting, themselves where it is safe and appropriate to do so;
(b) improving health literacy and ensuring that people living or working in the area have access to trusted, quality-assured information, advice and digital tools to support them in managing their own health and wellbeing;
(c) facilitating access to community pharmacy services, including pharmacy services that support self-care, the management of minor ailments and medicines optimisation;
(d) supporting patients to access the most appropriate level of care for their needs, including through patient-facing digital services connected to any system established under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (single patient record); and
(e) reducing avoidable demand on NHS services through the promotion of self-care and prevention.
(2) In preparing guidance under section 14Z58 of the National Health Service Act 2006 as amended by section 24(4) of this Act, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) improving health literacy;
(b) the role of community pharmacy as an accessible point of contact for self-care support and health advice; and
(c) the contribution of digital tools and patient-facing services to enabling self-care, self-management and appropriate care navigation.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, publish a self-care strategy for England (the "self-care strategy") which must set out—
(a) the national framework within which neighbourhood health plans will be required to embed self-care and self-management, including the management of self-limiting conditions, as a core component of local health and care services;
(b) the steps the Secretary of State will take to promote self-care and health literacy as part of the prevention and early intervention agenda across the NHS;
(c) the role of community pharmacy in delivering the self-care strategy, including the services and information that community pharmacy is expected to provide in support of self-care;
(d) the role of patient-facing digital services, including any system established under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006, in supporting self-care, self-management and navigation to appropriate care;
(e) the steps the Secretary of State will take to reduce avoidable demand on NHS services through the promotion of self-care; and
(f) the measurable outcomes against which progress in implementing the self-care strategy will be assessed, and the arrangements for reporting on progress.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay the self-care strategy before Parliament on the day on which it is published and must review and update it at intervals of not more than three years.
(5) In this section—
“neighbourhood health plan” has the same meaning as in section 24;
“self-care” means the actions taken by individuals to maintain their own health, manage minor or long-term conditions, including conditions that are self-limiting, and prevent ill health, including through the use of over-the-counter medicines, health information and digital tools.”
This new clause would require neighbourhood health plans to include arrangements for supporting self-care and self-management, including of minor and self-limiting conditions, and for improving health literacy. It would require guidance to the responsible local authority and integrated care boards to reflect these priorities, and would require the Secretary of State to publish a national self-care strategy setting out the framework, the role of community pharmacy and patient-facing digital services,
Opposition Amendment NC106
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Safe and proportionate reclassification of medicines
Within 12 months of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, the Secretary of State must publish an assessment of—
(a) opportunities to support self-care and prevention through the reclassification of medicines,
(b) barriers to appropriate medicines reclassification within the current regulatory framework,
(c) the impact of medicines reclassification on patient access, NHS demand and productivity, and
(d) steps being taken to support a proportionate and agile regulatory framework for medicines reclassification whilst maintaining patient safety.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an assessment in relation to the safe and proportionate reclassification of medicines.
None 78
Tessa Munt (LD)Clause 58, page 43, line 40, at end insert—
“1. (8B) Regulations under subsection (8A) must include provision about the period within which NICE guideline NG206 on myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) must be complied with.
2. (8D) The Secretary of State must publish an annual statement on compliance with NICE guideline NG206, including the extent to which integrated care boards and relevant NHS bodies have implemented recommendations relating to ME specialist services and severe or very severe ME.”
The amendment would require that a period must be set within which the NICE guideline NG206 on ME must be complied with by ICBs and other health bodies. Furthermore, the Secretary of State must publish an annual statement on compliance with NICE guideline NG206 across the NHS in England.
Opposition Amendment 77
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 68, page 47, line 27, leave out from “to” to the end of line 28 and insert “the affirmative procedure”
This amendment ensures that all secondary legislation as a result of this bill is subject to the affirmative procedure.
None 79
Anna Dixon (Lab)Clause 47, page 34, line 32, at end insert—
“(4A) In making the regulations the Secretary of State the Secretary of State must ensure that information in a single patient record is aligned with information from the Office of the Public Guardian regarding a patient’s—
(a) next of kin, or
(b) appointed legal representatives.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to ensure information in a single patient record is aligned with information from the Office of the Public Guardian regarding a patient’s next of kin or appointed legal representatives.
Government Amendment 80
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 70, page 48, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Section (Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements) extends to England and Wales and Scotland.”
This is consequential on NC92.
Government Amendment 81
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 71, page 48, line 25, leave out “Section 63” and insert “The following”.
This paves the way for Amendment 82.
Government Amendment 82
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 71, page 48, line 26, at end insert “—
(a) section 63 (Care Quality Commission: time limit for bringing proceedings);
(b) sections (Regulations: reference to agreements and standards), (Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements), (Consultation about medicines and medical devices regulations), (Medicines and medical devices regulations: parliamentary procedure), (Medical devices: parliamentary procedure for certain fees regulations).”
This provides for the new clauses listed to come into force 2 months after royal assent.
None 76
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 58, page 43, line 40, at end insert—
“(8B) Any period under subsection (8)(b) within which a recommendation is to be complied with may be no more than three months.”
Opposition Amendment NC73
Danny Chambers (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Mental Health)To move the following Clause—
“Review of arrangements between NHS bodies and local authorities
(1) The Secretary of State must conduct a review of arrangements entered into by NHS bodies and local authorities under section 75 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (Arrangements between NHS bodies and local authorities).
(2) In conducting the review, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) NHS bodies,
(b) local authorities, and
(c) any other person that the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) Following the review, the Secretary of State must consider whether the power to make regulations in section 75(1) or the power to issue guidance in section 75(6) of the National Health Service Act 2006 should be exercised in order to improve the effectiveness of arrangements under that section.
(4) Consideration of arrangements under subsection (3) must include ensuring that financial and contractual arrangements align costs and benefits across relevant bodies.
(5) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, and publish, a report of the review.
(6) The report of the review must explain whether the Secretary of State decided to exercise the powers in section 75(1) and 75(6) of the National Health Service Act 2006 and the reasons for that decision.
(7) The Secretary of State must comply with the requirements of this section before the end of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause aims to ensure that any review of section 75 arrangements explicitly considers whether regulations or guidance should be used to align costs and benefits across relevant bodies.
None NC74
John Slinger (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on the abolition of Healthwatch England
(1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on the impact of the abolition of Healthwatch England and transfer of Healthwatch England's functions to ICBs.
(2) The report must consider—
(a) the effectiveness of escalation routes for complaints,
(b) the ability to receive responses to complaints from the relevant ICB officer,
(c) accountability of ICB CEOs for delivering new functions arising from the abolition of Healthwatch;
(d) independence in the delivery of patient surveys, and
(e) ability to investigate organisations from which the ICB commissions services.
(3) The report must make recommendations about how any issues identified under subsection (2) may be mitigated.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a report within 12 months of the passage of this Act on the impact of the abolition of Healthwatch England and transfer of Healthwatch England's functions to ICBs.
None NC75
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the abolition of NHS England takes effect, prepare and lay before Parliament a report setting out a transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England (the "strategy").
(2) The strategy must—
(a) identify and map critical functions and areas of expertise currently exercised by NHS England, including clinical, operational, analytical and patient engagement capabilities;
(b) assess the risk of loss of knowledge, skills and organisational capacity arising from the abolition of NHS England;
(c) set out the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to ensure the retention and effective transfer of such functions, expertise, knowledge and skills; and
(d) assess the likely impact of the transition on the delivery of key health programmes and services, including cancer services.
(3) The Secretary of State must, at intervals of not more than 12 months, lay before Parliament a report on the implementation of the transition strategy.
(4) A report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) progress on workforce retention;
(b) arrangements for the transfer of knowledge, expertise and institutional capability; and
(c) any identified gaps in capability and the steps being taken to address them.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and lay before Parliament a formal transition strategy before the abolition of NHS England, setting out how critical functions and expertise will be identified, retained and transferred. It would also require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament at least annually on the implementation of that strategy.
Opposition Amendment 73
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Clause 29, page 21, leave out line 7
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
Opposition Amendment 74
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Schedule 3, page 80, leave out paragraphs 5 to 8
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
Opposition Amendment 75
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Schedule 3, page 80, leave out paragraph 14
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
Opposition Amendment NC72
Zöe Franklin (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Local Government)To move the following Clause—
“Surrey & East Hampshire: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Surrey & East Hampshire.
(2) “Adequate provision” under subsection (1) means —
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Surrey & East Hampshire.
None NC67
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Secretary of State directions relating to early access to medicines
(1) The Secretary of State may give directions to any of the bodies mentioned in subsection (2) about the implementation of a scheme providing early access to medicines to people with life-threatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
(2) The bodies are—
(a) integrated care board,
(b) NHS Trusts,
(c) NHS Foundation Trusts,
(d) NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts, and
(e) other health and social care bodies.”
This new clause would give the Secretary of State power to direct integrated care boards, NHS Trusts, NHS Foundation Trusts, and NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts to implement a scheme to provide early access to medicines to people with life-threatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
None NC68
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission a review of the regime for early and accelerated access to medicines in England and Wales.
(2) The review conducted under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the effectiveness of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) and Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP),
(b) the effectiveness of the early access outside of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) and Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP), and
(c) equality of access across England and Wales, with the aim of reducing geographical inequalities between different NHS trusts.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the report and recommendations of the review before both House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to commission a review of regime for early and accelerated access to medicines.
Opposition Amendment NC69
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“GP representation on integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must include as a member at least one individual who—
(a) is a registered medical practitioner, and
(b) has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(2) In appointing a member under subsection (1) an integrated care board must have regard to the member’s potential contribution to improving—
(a) patient journeys across services,
(b) coordination and continuity of care,
(c) prevention and population health management, and
(d) integration of services at neighbourhood level.”
This new clause would ensure that each integrated care board includes at least one member who is a registered medical practitioner, and has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
Opposition Amendment NC70
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to—
(a) service redesign,
(b) integration of health services,
(c) development of neighbourhood health services, and
(d) population health planning.
(2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) community pharmacy contractors,
(c) providers of primary dental services, and
(d) providers of ophthalmic services.
(3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes—
(a) involvement at an early stage in the development of ICB proposals,
(b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in ICB functions,
(c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence ICB decision-making, and
(d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of ICB functions.
(4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing—
(a) how it has complied with this section, and
(b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the ICB.
(5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This new clause ensures a certain range of primary care providers are consulted by integrated care boards in the development of their healthcare plans.
Opposition Amendment NC71
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of care for victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls
The Secretary of State and integrated care boards have a duty of care to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.”
This new clause would place a duty of care on the Secretary of State and integrated care boards to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.