make provision about health and social care.
The Health Bill is a Government Bill tabled by a Minister of the Crown.
Is this Bill currently before Parliament?Yes. This Bill was introduced on 14 May 2026 and is currently before Parliament.
Whose idea is this Bill?Government Bills implement the legislative agenda of the Government. This agenda, and the Bills that will implement it, are outlined in the Queen's Speech at the Session's State Opening of Parliament.
What type of Bill is this?Government Bills are technically Presentation Bills, but the Government can use its legislative time to ensure the schedule of debates to scrutinise the Bill.
So is this going to become a law?Though the Bill can be amended from its original form, the Bill will almost certainly be enacted in law before the end of the Session, or will be carried over to the subsequent Session.
How can I find out exactly what this Bill does?The most straightforward information is contained in the initial Explanatory Notes for the Bill.
Would you like to know more?See these Glossary articles for more information: Government Bills, Process of a Bill
Official Bill Page Initial Explanatory Notes Initial Briefing papers Ministerial Extracts from Debates All Bill Debates
Next Event: Monday 7th September 2026 - Report stage
Last Event: Thursday 16th July 2026 - Committee stage: 17th sitting (Commons)
Bill Progession through Parliament
NC1
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“National Maternity Commissioner
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, appoint a National Maternity Commissioner, situated within the Department of Health and Social Care.
(2) The functions of the National Maternity Commissioner are to—
(a) oversee NHS maternity services;
(b) act as an independent voice for women and families;
(c) ensure lessons are learned from identified failures and that the recommendations of maternity reviews are acted upon;
(d) promote consistency, safety and accountability across NHS maternity services; and
(e) advise the Secretary of State on matters relating to the safety, quality and provision of maternity services in England.
(3) The person appointed as Commissioner must—
(a) be a person with knowledge, expertise and experience relevant to the discharge of functions of the role;
(b) have first-hand experience of working in maternity services, so far as reasonably possible; and
(c) not be a sitting Member of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to appoint a maternity commissioner within the Department of Health and Social Care to oversee national maternity services.
NC2
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Assessment of risks posed by contracts with non-UK based suppliers
(1) Within six months of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must conduct and lay before Parliament a risk assessment of all contracts between NHS organisations and suppliers based outside of the UK.
(2) In conducting an assessment under this section, the Secretary of State must –
(a) pay particular regard to contracts which provide technology companies with access to confidential patient data;
(b) consult national security experts on the risks posed to UK sovereignty by such contracts;
(c) consider risks associated with the sharing of confidential patient data with organisations based outside of the UK;
(d) assess public and NHS staff attitudes to relevant suppliers and any implications such attitudes may have on the use and effectiveness of products or services provided under the contract; and
(e) consider the background of relevant suppliers, known contracts with other states and organisations, and any relevant ethical considerations.
(3) Where any significant risk is identified, the Secretary of State must set out the Government’s intentions to manage and mitigate such risks, including its intention to use or develop domestic technologies, systems or products in place of those provided under the relevant contract.”
This new clause would require the government to publish a risk assessment of contracts between NHS organisations and suppliers based outside of the UK.
NC3
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise domestic suppliers
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
1CD Duty to prioritise domestic suppliers
(1) In exercising functions in relation to the health and care service, the Secretary of State must prioritise the awarding of any contract that will involve the handling of NHS patient data to suppliers based in the United Kingdom.
(2) The Secretary of State may only seek to procure technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data from suppliers based outside of the United Kingdom where a viable domestic alternative does not exist.
(3) Before signing any contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must consult with –
(a) patient groups,
(b) national security experts, and
(c) staff unions,
on the proposed contract and lay a report on such a consultation before Parliament.
(4) Where it is proposed to sign a contract for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must arrange for a motion agreeing to the signing of such a contract to be tabled in each House of Parliament, and no such contract may be signed where a motion for its agreement is negatived by either House of Parliament.
(5) If a contract is awarded for the procurement of technology and information systems which will handle NHS patient data with a supplier based outside of the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State must place a statement before both Houses of Parliament setting out whether the Government is taking, or is planning to take, steps to develop or support long-term domestic alternatives to the systems provided by the contract.”
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to prioritise domestic, UK-based, suppliers for technology systems and contracts handling NHS patient data, and places restrictions on the signing of contracts for such systems with non-UK based suppliers.
NC4
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the passing of this Act, publish a strategy (“an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy”) which sets out the Government's approach to maintaining the security and resilience of relevant NHS information systems by–
(a) assessing, managing and mitigating risks –
(i) associated with foreign interference,
(ii) arising from reliance on foreign-supplied technologies, and
(b) preventing over-reliance on foreign providers by building domestic capacity.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a “relevant information system” is an information system with access to NHS patient data.
(3) An NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy published under this section must—
(a) include risks associated with—
(i) hardware,
(ii) software,
(iii) supply chains, and
(iv) procurement processes;
(b) include a specific focus on security and resilience in digital procurement processes, detailing how the Government intends to reduce strategic dependencies on foreign-owned service providers to mitigate the risk of systemic disruption;
(c) include a commitment to prioritise the use of technologies developed in the UK by UK organisations in relevant information systems to reduce reliance on foreign technologies;
(d) recommend steps to support and develop sufficient domestic capability where it does not currently exist;
(e) where risks are identified, state how the Government intends to address these risks by supporting the use or development of domestic technologies or systems.”
This new clause would require the Government to publish an NHS Digital Sovereignty Strategy setting out how it intends to address risks to relevant information systems posed by foreign interference and reliance on foreign technologies, including by supporting the use of domestic technologies.
NC5
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Health Data Charter
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passing of this Act, establish an independent body (to be known as the "Sovereign Health Data Trust”) for the purpose of creating a Health Data Charter.
(2) The membership of the Trust should include—
(a) people with a diverse range of backgrounds; and
(b) health data experts, clinicians and patient representatives.
(3) The Charter must—
(a) set out the fundamental principles and responsibilities for assessing whether a data sharing partnership is in the interest of the public and the NHS;
(b) include the primary goal of protecting people’s privacy and their data from exploitation, while promoting trust in data systems and the handling of health data;
(c) ensure patients have control of their data, including providing relevant opt-outs;
(d) provide that all health data is held anonymously and accessed through a trusted research environment;
(e) set out ways to retain and protect the value of health data in England, including providing measures to invest a share of the income generated from new medicines or treatments developed with that health data to be invested back into the NHS;
(f) be designed in such a way as to render it interoperable with the European Health Data Space in technical terms, including through the promotion of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data principles within the NHS.
(4) The Sovereign Health Data Trust will—
(a) hold continuous oversight of all health data and oversee the trusted research environment;
(b) have power to recall or restrict an organisation’s access to data if it has reason to believe that the data is not being used for public or patient benefit;
(c) ensure that all data sharing arrangements with a non-NHS organisation are transparent, with all health data contracts entered into by a public body made publicly available;
(d) publish detailed minutes of all meetings discussing potential uses of health data; and
(e) ensure all health data collection and sharing initiatives are preceded by public consultation, involvement and awareness.”
NC6
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Maternity Safety
(1) The Secretary of State must ensure that every NHS maternity unit is rated “good” or
“outstanding” by the CQC.
(2) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months of the passage of this Act, establish a scheme to support NHS trusts to deliver the requirement under subsection (1), which includes—
(a) 24/7 consultant obstetrician cover on every labour ward,
(b) one-to-one midwifery care,
(c) a Director of Midwifery in every maternity service,
(d) ringfenced maternity service development funding, and
(e) a dedicated neonatal workforce plan.
(3) Within 12 months of the commencement of the scheme under subsection (2), and every 12 months thereafter, an annual report should be laid before both Houses of Parliament on the effectiveness of the scheme.”
This new clause would place a duty on the Secretary of State to create a scheme to ensure that every maternity unit in the country achieves a “good” or “outstanding” rating by the CQC.
NC7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthy life expectancy target
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must—
(a) make regulations to set a statutory target for improving overall healthy life expectancy for the population of Great Britain, and
(b) publish a cross-governmental strategy, renewed every 24 months, to set out how the target set by regulations under subsection (1)(a) will be achieved.
(2) The strategy under subsection (1)(b) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
(3) Upon publication of a strategy under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must make a statement before the House of Commons regarding progress made towards the target set by subsection (1)(a).”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations to establish a statutory target for healthy life expectancy in Great Britain and publish a strategy every two years setting out how this target will be achieved.
NC8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Impact of trade deals on the NHS
(1) Any trade negotiation which would require NHS spending or funding to exceed £100 million must be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State in the form of regulations subject to the affirmative procedure.
(2) Before laying regulations under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must publish an impact assessment about how the trade negotiation will affect NHS frontline services and patients.”
This new clause would require any trade negotiation which would require NHS spending or funding to exceed £100 million to be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State in the form of regulations subject to the affirmative procedure.
NC9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Powers for coroners and medical examiners to report suspected health system failings
(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, establish a standard mechanism for coroners and medical examiners to refer cases where they suspect failings in the provision of health care.
(2) A coroner or a medical examiner has a duty to report (a "duty to whistleblow") using the mechanism established under subsection (1) if, in the course of their duties, they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a death or incident involved systemic failings in a health care setting.
(3) A referral under this section must be directed to any or all of the following bodies, as the coroner or medical examiner considers appropriate, based on the nature of the suspected failing—
(a) the chief officer of police for the relevant police area,
(b) the Care Quality Commission,
(c) the Department of Health and Social Care, and
(d) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body.
(4) Regulations under subsection (1) must specify—
(a) the information to be included in a referral,
(b) the timeframe within which a referral must be made following the formation of a suspicion, and
(c) guidance on the criteria for determining to which of the bodies listed in subsection (3) the referral must be directed.
(5) A disclosure made in fulfilment of the duty under subsection (2) is a protected disclosure for the purposes of Part 4A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (protection for whistleblowing).
(6) The duties imposed by this section are in addition to, and do not affect, a senior coroner’s duty to make a report under paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (reports on action to prevent other deaths).”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to create a standardised framework for them to formally refer suspected health system failings (including systemic issues) directly to the police, the CQC, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the HSSIB, with a duty on coroners to participate. It provides legal protection for those making such referrals.
NC10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of NHS boards to report medical malpractice
(1) A member of the board of directors of an NHS trust or an NHS foundation trust in England must report any evidence or reports they have seen of systemic medical malpractice within the trust to—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the Department of Health and Social Care, and
(c) the Health Services Safety Investigations Body.
(2) The board of directors of an NHS trust or NHS foundation trust in England has a collective duty to—
(a) refer the trust to the Care Quality Commission, and
(b) alert the Department of Health and Social Care and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body, if staff employed by, or acting on behalf of, the trust raise concerns of systemic medical malpractice.
(3) In this section, “systemic medical malpractice” means an action or omission in the provision of health care that falls below the expected standard of care and indicates a widespread, patterned, or recurring failure within the systems, processes, or governance of the trust.”
This new clause would introduce a mandatory individual duty for members of NHS and Foundation Trust boards to escalate evidence of systemic medical malpractice to the CQC, the Department of Health and Social Care, and the HSSIB. It also imposes a collective duty on the board to formally refer the trust to regulators if staff raise concerns regarding malpractice.
NC11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty as respects waiting times for women’s health
In the National Health Service Act 2006, after section 1CC (inserted by section 6 of this Act) insert—
“1CD Duty as respects waiting times for women's health
The Secretary of State must exercise functions in relation to the health service with a view to ensuring that average waiting times for the diagnosis and elective treatment of conditions primarily affecting women do not exceed the overall average waiting times for NHS diagnosis and elective treatment.””
This new clause would ensure that the average waiting time for diagnosis and treatment for elective conditions for women’s health issues do not exceed the average wait time for wider NHS elective treatment.
NC12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Inquiry into women’s health outcomes
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission an independent inquiry into women’s health provision and outcomes in England.
(2) Any inquiry established under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the causes of—
(i) poorer health outcomes, and
(ii) disparities in patient safety,
for women;
(b) the effectiveness of existing commissioning arrangements in meeting the needs of women, and
(c) recommendations to assist the Secretary of State in discharging the duty to reduce inequalities in health outcomes under section 1C of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a report on the findings of the inquiry before Parliament within the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause would establish an inquiry into the poorer health outcomes faced by women.
NC13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Disinformation
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the Strategy”).
(2) The strategy must consider—
(a) support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with persons who are anti-vaccine,
(b) support for medical professionals and NHS leaders to engage with anti-vaccine councillors or officials in local authorities,
(c) investment in public messaging to combat medical disinformation, including engagement with trusted online influencers,
(d) outreach campaigns focused on communities who are sceptical about vaccinations,
(e) introducing criminal liability for those, including online influencers and politicians, who profit from medical disinformation,
(f) a new verification requirement for any social media account claiming to be a medical professional.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to combat anti-vaccine and medical disinformation.
NC14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthwatch funding
(1) The Secretary of State, must within 12 months of the passing of this Act, enact a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
(2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding with inflation for 2026/2027.”
This new clause would ensure that Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations are funded to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
NC15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Public Health Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the passage of this Act to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities.
(2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must—
(a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership,
(b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership,
(c) be chaired by the Prime Minister,
(d) meet once in each annual quarter.
(3) Under subsection 2(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee's meetings each year.
(4) Each government Department must publish an annual report on their department's consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government Departments.
(5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee.
(6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
This new clause would establish a Public Health Committee and Health Creation Unit to promote public health and cross-government policy making.
NC16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote public health
All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
This new clause will place a duty on all ministers to consider health outcomes and the promotion of public health when exercising their duties.
NC17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing
(1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if—
(a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and
(b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
(2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
This new clause would require the Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing to be brought before the House for a vote.
NC18
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Access to dental provision: Dental deserts
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must establish a scheme to improve access to dental provision (“the Scheme”).
(2) The purpose of the Scheme is to end dental deserts.
(3) A dental desert is defined as any local authority area with fewer than ten active dental practices per 100,000 people.
(4) The Scheme must make provision to support integrated care boards to—
(a) guarantee emergency access to an NHS dentist,
(b) provide free dental checks up for—
(i) children,
(ii) mothers within one year of having given birth,
(iii) pregnant women, and
(iv) low-income households,
(c) guarantee dental appointments for persons commencing—
(i) surgery,
(ii) chemotherapy, or
(iii) transplant procedures.
(5) The Secretary of State must, before publishing the Scheme, issue a reformed dental contract.
(6) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the establishment of the scheme, publish a dental workforce plan to support delivery of the scheme.”
This new clause would establish a scheme to support integrated care boards to end dental deserts.
NC19
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Cancer treatment: waiting times
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make provision for every patient to have access to cancer treatment within 62 days following referral.
(2) The Secretary of State must establish a scheme to support NHS hospital trusts in meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(3) As part of the Scheme, the Secretary of State must expand the capacity of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
(4) The Secretary of State must make an annual statement to Parliament on progress on meeting the requirement under subsection (1).
(5) Any statement made under subsection (4) should be made as close as reasonably practicable to 4 February.”
This new clause gives patients a right to start cancer treatment within 62 days of referral and requires the Secretary of State to establish a scheme to deliver this. It also requires the Secretary of State to update the House on progress against the target on/around the time of World Cancer Day.
NC20
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Cancer Survival Research
(1) Within 12 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must by regulations establish a Cancer Survival Research Programme.
(2) Regulations under this section must—
(a) require government co-ordination and funding for research into cancers with a five-year survival rate below 20%, and
(b) establish a fellowship programme for foreign academics in cancer research.
(3) Any programme established under paragraph 2(b) must make provision to waive visa fees for entry into the UK for participating academics.
(4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to introduce regulations requiring the government to coordinate research into cancers with the lowest survival rate.
NC21
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“GP representation on integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must include as a member at least one individual who—
(a) is a registered medical practitioner, and
(b) has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(2) In appointing a member under subsection (1) an integrated care board must have regard to the member’s potential contribution to improving—
(a) patient journeys across services,
(b) coordination and continuity of care,
(c) prevention and population health management, and
(d) integration of services at neighbourhood level.”
This new clause would ensure that each integrated care board includes at least one member who is a registered medical practitioner, and has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
NC22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to—
(a) service redesign,
(b) integration of health services,
(c) development of neighbourhood health services, and
(d) population health planning.
(2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) community pharmacy contractors,
(c) providers of primary dental services, and
(d) providers of ophthalmic services.
(3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes—
(a) involvement at an early stage in the development of ICB proposals,
(b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in ICB functions,
(c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence ICB decision making, and
(d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of ICB functions.
(4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing—
(a) how it has complied with this section, and
(b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the ICB.
(5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This new clause ensures a certain range of primary care providers are consulted by integrated care boards in the development of their healthcare plans.
NC23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of care for victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls
The Secretary of State and integrated care boards have a duty of care to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.”
This new clause would place a duty of care on the Secretary of State and integrated care boards to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.
19
Steff Aquarone (LD)Clause 4, page 3, line 29, at end insert—
“(c) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between coastal and inland areas, and
(d) reduce inequalities between the people of England with respect to the access to health services and outcomes achieved for them between rural and urban areas.”
This amendment would create a duty for the Secretary of State to reduce inequalities between coastal and inland areas and rural and urban areas.
10
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would place the original mental health investment standard on a statutory footing, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on mental health services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
17
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on Primary Care services.
(2B) The increase in spending set out in subsection (2B) must be in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would introduce the primary care Investment standard, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on primary care services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
20
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 47, page 32, line 30, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State must give integrated care boards directions to increase spending on Primary Care services.
(2B) The increase in spending set out in subsection 2B must be in line with the change in level of their total programme funding.”
This amendment would introduce the primary care Investment standard, requiring integrated care boards to increase spending on primacy health services at least in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
11
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 10 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on mental health services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
18
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A) and (2B)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 17 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on primary care services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
21
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 47, page 32, line 34, after "subsection (1)” insert “and (2A) and (2B)”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 20 and would enable the Secretary of State to implement financial penalties if an integrated care board fails to comply with a direction to increase spending on primary care services in line with the growth in their total programme (healthcare) funding.
15
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 51, page 36, line 13, after “behalf” insert “, including nominated carers”
This amendment makes it explicit that nominated carers can access the single patient record on behalf of those they care for.
23
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) The regulations must make provision for medical markers for firearms licence holders to be visible to all relevant health workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
(3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of introducing a statutory requirement for mandatory medical markers for firearms licence holders to be used by those relevant in providing patient care.”
This amendment would require medical markers for firearms licence holders to be visible to all relevant health workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
24
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 23, at end insert—
“(3A) The regulations must make provision for prior membership in the armed forces to be visible to all relevant healthcare workers under the establishment of a single patient record.
(3B) The regulations must include a requirement for the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a report on the potential merits of making prior membership in the armed forces visible on the single patient record.
(3C) A report under subsection (3B) must consider—
(a) the ability of veterans to access the necessary NHS support, and
(b) the ability of medical staff to provide former members of the armed forces with appropriate care.”
This amendment would require prior membership in the armed forces to be visible to all relevant healthcare workers under the establishment of a single patient record and require the Secretary of State to publish a report on making prior membership in the armed forces visible on the single patient record.
22
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)Clause 51, page 36, line 32, at end insert—
“(6A) Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a risk assessment on the potential for digital exclusion under the establishment of a single patient record.
(6B) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must consult all stakeholders the Secretary of State considers relevant, including patient representation groups.
(6C) In preparing a risk assessment under subsection (6A) the Secretary of State must have particular regard for—
(a) those without access to a suitable electronic device,
(b) those without access to suitable broadband connectivity,
(c) those with physical and/or mental disabilities,
(d) those belonging to groups considered socially excluded, and
(e) those considered lacking digital skills.
(6D) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the risk assessment under subsection (6A) before both Houses of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a risk assessment on the potential for digital exclusion under the establishment of single patient record.
1
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 45, line 39, leave out Clause 63
2
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 3, leave out Clause 64
3
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 46, line 39, leave out Clause 65
4
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 47, line 36, leave out Clause 66
7
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 15, leave out Clause 68
This amendment removes the clause abolishing Healthwatch England.
5
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 48, line 18, leave out Clause 69
6
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)Page 52, line 34, leave out Clause 75
16
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 3, page 88, line 19, at end insert—
“(1A) The function under sub-paragraph (1) must be exercised by a person employed in the civil service of the State, and a Minister of the Crown or a special adviser must not be involved in any decision relating to such an appointment, suspension or removal.”
This amendment would ensure that civil servants are responsible for the decision making and appointment processes for trust and ICB leaders, rather than Ministers or Special Advisers.
13
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 106, leave out lines 34 and 35 and insert—
“For section 255 (power to request NHS England to establish information systems), substitute—
“255 Powers to request the Secretary of State to establish information systems
(1) Any person (including a devolved authority) may request the Secretary of State to establish and operate a system for the collection or analysis of information of a description specified in the request.
(2) A request may be made under subsection (1) by a person only if the person considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the person to have in relation to the person's exercise of functions, or carrying out of activities, in connection with the provision of health care or adult social care.
(3) The Secretary of State must comply with a mandatory request unless the Secretary of State considers that the request relates to information of a description prescribed in regulations.
(4) For the purposes of this Chapter a request under subsection (1) is a mandatory request if—
(a) it is made by a principal body, and
(b) the body considers that the information which could be obtained by complying with the request is information which it is necessary or expedient for the body to have in relation to its discharge of a duty in connection with the provision of health services or of adult social care in England.
(5) Subsection (6) applies where the Secretary of State has discretion under this section as to whether to comply with—
(a) a mandatory request, or
(b) other request under subsection (1).
(6) In deciding whether to comply with the request, the Secretary of State —
(a) must, in particular, consider whether doing so would interfere to an unreasonable extent with the exercise by the Secretary of State of any of its functions, and
(b) may take into account the extent to which the principal body or other person making the request has had regard to—
(i) the code of practice prepared and published by the Secretary of State under section 263, and
(ii) advice or guidance given by the Secretary of State under section 265.
(7) In this section “principal body” means—
(a) the Care Quality Commission,
(b) the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and
(c) such other persons as may be prescribed in regulations.
(8) In this Chapter “health care” includes all forms of health care whether relating to physical or mental health and also includes procedures that are similar to forms of medical or surgical care but are not provided in connection with a medical condition.””
This amendment would enable the Care Quality Commission and NICE to continue to make mandatory requests to the Secretary of State to establish an information system, following the transfer of NHS England’s functions.
14
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 8, page 110, line 37, leave out paragraph 14
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 13.
12
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Schedule 9, page 130, line 16, at end insert—
“(2A) After paragraph 6(8) insert—
“(9) A committee of the Commission is to be appointed in accordance with regulations.
(10) The purpose of the committee is to oversee the health services safety investigation functions formerly conducted by HHSIB, transferred to the Care Quality Commission under the Health Act 2026.
(11) The committee is to be operationally independent from the Care Quality Commission.
(12) The committee is to consist of a chair appointed by the Secretary of State, and not less than six and not more than twelve other members appointed by the chair.
(13) A majority of the members of the committee must not be members of the Care Quality Commission.
(14) So far as is reasonably practicable, the persons appointed to the committee must include persons with knowledge or experience relevant to the discharge of functions under this paragraph.””
This amendment would ensure that oversight of HSSIB’s functions would remain operationally independent of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) following the transfer of its functions to the CQC.
8
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 134, line 20, leave out Schedule 10
This amendment removes the schedule abolishing Healthwatch England.
9
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Page 136, line 1, leave out Schedule 11
This amendment removes the schedule abolishing Local Healthwatch organisations.
NC112
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Armed Forces Covenant Duty Reporting
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the extent to which the duty for due regard for health and social care matters under the Armed Forces Covenant established by the Armed Forces Act 2006 has been met.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must include an assessment of—
(a) the extent to which the health and social care needs of the armed forces community are being embedded in health and social care guidance, workforce training, and professional standards in the NHS,
(b) the impact of national schemes such as—
(i) the Veteran-Aware Trust accreditation,
(ii) the Veteran-Friendly GP Accreditation Scheme, and
(iii) the National Armed Forces Training and Education Programme on the provision of health and social care for the armed forces community,
(c) collaboration between devolved administrations and the Department for Health and Social Care regarding the delivery of health and social care for the armed forces community, and
(d) provision for data collection on the armed forces community's access to and experience of NHS health and social care.
(3) The report under subsection (1) must be laid before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the extent to which the duty for due regard for health and social care matters under the Armed Forces Covenant established by the Armed Forces Act 2006 has been met.
NC113
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme (No. 2)
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 4, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen,
(b) have indefinite leave to remain under the Immigration Act 1971, or
(c) have settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme, and
(d) hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens, people with indefinite leave to remain, or settled status who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
NC110
James MacCleary (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Defence)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans
(1) Each integrated care board must exercise its functions with a view to improving and maintaining the physical health, mental health, and wellbeing of armed forces veterans within its area.
(2) In exercising its duties under this section, an integrated care board must have regard to—
(a) reduction of health inequalities experienced by veterans,
(b) prevention of deterioration in veterans’ physical and/or mental health,
(c) the need to ensure veterans are able to access appropriate preventative and other health services and support.
(3) An integrated care board must take reasonable steps to ensure that NHS bodies and providers of NHS services within its area provide veterans with information about support available to them for their health and wellbeing.
(4) In preparing a neighbourhood health plan under section 24 of the Health Act 2026 an integrated care board must include—
(a) an assessment of the health and wellbeing needs of veterans within its area,
(b) steps the integrated care board proposes to take to improve outcomes for veterans, and
(c) measures for reducing inequalities experienced by veterans.””
This new clause would introduce a duty for integrated care boards to promote the health and wellbeing of armed forces veterans.
NC111
James MacCleary (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Defence)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to provide medical records on discharge from the armed forces
(1) This section applies where a person ceases to be a member of the regular forces or the reserve forces.
(2) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for a complete copy of the person’s service medical records to be provided to the person no later than one month after the day on which the person is discharged or otherwise ceases to be a member of those forces.
(3) Those regulations may specify the manner and form in which service medical records are to be provided under this section, including provision for records to be transferred directly to a civilian health body with the person's consent.
(4) In this section—
“health body” means—
(a) in relation to England—
(i) NHS England;
(ii) an integrated care board established under section 14Z25 of the National Health Service Act 2006;
(iii) a National Health Service trust in England;
(iv) an NHS foundation trust;
(v) primary care providers;
(b) in relation to Wales—
(i) a Local Health Board established under section 11 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006;
(ii) a Special Health Authority established under section 22 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006, other than a cross-border Special Health Authority;
(iii) a National Health Service trust in Wales;
(iv) primary care providers;
(c) in relation to Scotland—
(i) a Health Board constituted under section 2 of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978;
(ii) a Special Health Board constituted under section 2 of that Act;
(iii) the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service;
(iv) primary care providers;
(d) in relation to Northern Ireland—
(i) a Local Commissioning Group appointed under section 9 of the Health and Social Care (Reform) Act (Northern Ireland) 2009 (c. 1 (N.I.));
(ii) a Health and Social Care trust established by virtue of Article 10 of the Health and Personal Social Services (Northern Ireland) Order 1991 (S.I. 1991/194 (N.I. 1)), other than the Northern Ireland Ambulance Service Health and Social Care Trust.
(iii) primary care providers;
(5) For the purposes of this section, “service medical records” means any records relating to the person’s physical or mental health care and treatment created or maintained by or on behalf of His Majesty's forces during the person's period of service.”
This new clause places a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that all service personnel leaving the military receive a complete copy of their medical records within one month of their discharge date.
NC109
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause— “Hospices revenue funding The Secretary of State must ensure that any funding for hospices is allocated for three-year periods.”
NC108
Alison Bennett (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Care and Carers)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to collect information: Deaths awaiting palliative care
After section 14Z44 of the NHS Act 2006 insert—
“Duty to collect information: Deaths awaiting palliative care
(1) Each integrated care board must collect data on the number of patients who died while waiting for end-of-life care.
(2) Data under subsection (1) must be held anonymised and published by the Department of Health and Social Care.””
This new clause would place a duty on ICBs to collect and publish data on the number of patients who died while waiting for end-of-life care.
NC107
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“NICE technology appraisal recommendation: penalty scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must establish by regulations a penalty scheme relating to the implementation of NICE technology appraisal recommendations (the "scheme").
(2) Under the scheme, Health and Social Care bodies must implement a NICE technology appraisal recommendation within three months of receiving such a recommendation.
(3) Any Health and Social Care body that fails to meet the requirement set out in subsection (2) is liable to a penalty as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations.
(4) Regulations under this section are subject to the affirmative procedure.”
NC76
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing
(1) The Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing may be ratified only if—
(a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before the House of Commons a copy of the Arrangement, and
(b) the Arrangement has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons on a motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
(2) Before tabling a motion under subsection (1)(b) the Secretary of State must publish and lay before the House of Commons an impact assessment on the potential effects on the health service of implementation of the Arrangement.”
This new clause would require the Arrangement between the United States of America and the United Kingdom on pharmaceutical pricing to be brought before the House for a vote.
NC77
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Disinformation
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 6 months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, publish a strategy on anti-vaccine and medical disinformation (“the Strategy”).
(2) The strategy must consider—
(a) support for medical professionals to build trust and engage with persons who are anti-vaccine,
(b) support for medical professionals and NHS leaders to engage with anti-vaccine councillors or officials in local authorities,
(c) investment in public messaging to combat medical disinformation, including engagement with trusted online influencers,
(d) outreach campaigns focused on communities who are sceptical about vaccinations,
(e) introducing criminal liability for those, including online influencers and politicians, who profit from medical disinformation, and
(f) a new verification requirement for any social media account claiming to be a medical professional.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of this strategy before Parliament upon publication.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to publish a strategy to combat anti-vaccine and medical disinformation.
NC78
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Healthwatch funding
(1) The Secretary of State, must within 12 months of the passing of this act, enact a scheme to fund Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations for the 2027/2028 financial year to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
(2) The Secretary of State must consider uprating this funding with inflation for 2026/2027.”
This new clause would ensure that Healthwatch England and local Healthwatch organisations are funded to the level estimated by the Department for Health and Social Care in 2013/14.
NC79
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Public Health Committee
(1) The Secretary of State must establish a Public Health Committee within six months of the passage of this Act to ensure a cross-governmental focus and consideration of the promotion of public health in government policy and address national health inequalities.
(2) The Public Health Committee under subsection (1) must—
(a) include at least one minister from each government Department in its membership,
(b) include all cabinet ministers in its membership,
(c) be chaired by the Prime Minister, and
(d) meet once in each annual quarter.
(3) Under subsection 2(b), cabinet members must attend at least three quarters of the Public Health Committee's meetings each year.
(4) Each government Department must publish an annual report on their department's consideration of public health in its policy and the extent of joint policy formulation with other government Departments.
(5) The Secretary of State must establish a Health Creation Unit to support the Public Health Committee.
(6) The Health Creation Unit must submit an annual report on its activities, decision-making and cross-government progress to the Liaison Committee.”
This new clause would establish a Public Health Committee and Health Creation Unit to promote public health and cross-government policy making.
NC80
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to promote public health
All Ministers of the Crown have a duty to consider health outcomes and the promotion and protection of public health when exercising their duties.”
This new clause will place a duty on all ministers to consider health outcomes and the promotion of public health when exercising their duties.
NC81
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Minimum service levels
(1) Within six months beginning on the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision for minimum service levels to operate in the NHS during periods of strike action.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1) may repeal or otherwise amend provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025, insofar as is necessary for the purposes of this section.
(3) Regulations under subsection (1) must include provision for minimum levels of service by categories of NHS workforce staff, including all Agenda for Change staff but not resident doctors.
(4) Regulations under subsection (1) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
(5) When minimum service levels are in operation under this section, the NHS must set minimum standards of acceptable service to be provided by the NHS during periods of strike action, including mitigating any effect on appointments, medical procedures, acute services, midwifery, surgical procedures, and any other matters that the Secretary of State deems appropriate.
(6) With one year beginning on the day on which regulations are made under subsection (1), and within each period of a year thereafter, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on compliance with minimum service levels, including reasons for any failure by operators to secure the required thresholds, and actions the NHS is taking to improve performance to meet the minimum service levels.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to make regulations which create minimum service levels to operate in the NHS during periods of strike action.
NC82
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Strike action
(1) It is an offence for medical practitioners to undertake strike action.
(2) The Secretary of State may repeal or otherwise amend provisions in the Employment Rights Act 2025, insofar as is necessary for the purposes of this section.”
This new clause would make it illegal for doctors to go on strike.
NC83
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Exemption from the Public Sector Equality Duty
(1) Any organisation in receipt of public funding to provide health or social care services in England is exempt from the Public Sector Equality Duty (Chapter 1 of the Equality Act 2010) in respect of the provision of those services.
(2) The Secretary of State may make any regulations necessary to amend any other enactment as a consequence of subsection (1).”
This new clause would exempt health and social care services in England from the Public Sector Equality Duty.
NC84
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Publication of data on avoidable deaths
(1) The Secretary of State must publish every quarter the number of avoidable deaths attributed to waits of more than 12 hours in accident and emergency departments.
(2) The Secretary of State must make the data under subsection (1) available by integrated care board area.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish data on avoidable deaths caused by waits over 12 hours in A&E departments.
NC85
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Patient safety recommendations: Government response
(1) This section applies where the Secretary of State commissions a review or a report into a patient safety issue.
(2) The Secretary of State must—
(a) decide within six months whether they are going to implement each recommendation;
(b) publish a response to each recommendation with a clear statement of whether the recommendation is to be implemented; and
(c) publish a timeline for implementation of those recommendations which they have decided to implement.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to respond to patient safety recommendations.
NC86
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Referrals by general practitioners
NHS Trusts and NHS Foundation Trusts must ensure that all general practitioners are able to directly refer patients to consultants.”
This new clause would ensure that GPs must be able to refer patients directly to consultants.
NC87
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritising British citizens for the UK foundation programme
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 4, after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) A person is within this subsection if they—
(a) are a British citizen, and
(b) hold a primary medical qualification from an international branch campus of a higher education institution in the United Kingdom.””
This new clause amends the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 so that British citizens who have studied at international branch campuses of UK higher education institutions can be prioritised for foundation programme training places.
NC88
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“National strategy on sexual health
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must prepare and publish a national strategy on sexual health.
(2) In preparing a strategy under subsection (1) the Secretary of State must consult all stakeholders the Secretary of State considers relevant, including patient representation groups.
(3) A strategy under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the adequacy of current funding channels,
(b) equitable access to sexual healthcare services,
(c) sexual health inequalities, and
(d) the adequacy of sexually transmitted diseases test provision.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the national strategy under subsection (1) before both Houses of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and publish a national strategy on the accessibility of sexual healthcare.
NC89
Anna Dixon (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of health bodies to provide information and advice to carers
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must make provision for an information and support service for unpaid carers.
(2) The service under subsection (1) must include—
(a) provision for an unpaid carer to access information regarding recommended care and treatment needs for the person for whom they are caring,
(b) information about services, support and assistance available from the National Health Service to assist unpaid carers in their caring role,
(c) information about the availability of support for unpaid carers provided by local authorities,
(d) information about support available to promote and maintain the health, wellbeing and resilience of unpaid carers,
(e) information about arrangements for obtaining advice, training, advocacy or peer support relevant to unpaid carers’ caring role, and
(f) any other provisions which the Secretary of State considers appropriate for supporting unpaid carers in relation to their delivery of care.
(3) In exercising the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must prioritise proactive identification of unpaid carers and ensuring that information and advice is accessible, proportionate and appropriate to the needs of unpaid carers.
(4) In exercising the duty under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to an unpaid carer’s willingness and ability to provide care.
(5) The Secretary of State must take reasonable steps to ensure that unpaid carers are made aware of the information and advice available under this section.
(6) For the purposes of this section, “unpaid carer” has the meaning given to “carer” in section 10 of the Care Act 2014.”
This new clause would create a duty for the Secretary of State to provide certain information and advice to unpaid carers.
NC90
Anna Dixon (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on integration of health and social care services
(1) Within six months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament about options for strengthening the integration of health and social care in England.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider the integration of health and social care in terms of commissioning—
(a) between local authorities and the NHS, and
(b) between healthcare and social care providers.
(3) Within six months of the report under subsection (1) being laid, the Secretary of State must make provision to implement the option for integration in the report which the Secretary of State considers most appropriate.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to lay a report before both Houses of Parliament about options for strengthening the integration of health and social care in England.
NC91
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Regulations: reference to agreements and standards
(1) The Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 2 (power to make regulations about human medicines), after subsection (4) insert—
“(4A) Regulations under subsection (1) making provision in reliance on section 3, 4, 5 or 7 may refer to international agreements or standards relating to human medicines, including agreements or standards as they have effect from time to time.”
(3) In section 16 (manufacture, marketing and supply), after subsection (2) insert—
“(3) Provision made in reliance on subsection (1)(a) may refer to United Kingdom standards that—
(a) relate to the marketing, putting into service or other supply of medical devices, and
(b) are specified in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time.
(4) Regulations made under section 15(1) that contain provision made in reliance on subsection (1)(a) about relevant requirements (or exceptions from them) may include provision in relation to a medical device where—
(a) the device complies with regulatory requirements applicable somewhere outside the United Kingdom which is specified in regulations, and
(b) a description of the device and the regulatory requirements applicable to it are contained in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time.
(5) In this section “United Kingdom standard” means a standard that is—
(a) set by the British Standards Institution, or
(b) primarily developed for use in the United Kingdom, or part of the United Kingdom.””
This new clause would amend the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 to (a) enable regulations to refer to both international agreements and standards and standards developed in the United Kingdom and (b) enable the Secretary of State to dispense with requirements placed on devices which meet regulatory requirements applicable outside the United Kingdom.
NC92
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements
(1) The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/618) are amended as follows.
(2) For regulation 1A (Schedules) substitute—
“1A Schedule
Schedule 2A has effect.”
(3) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (1)—
(a) in the definition of “mutual recognition agreement”, in paragraph (a), for “country listed in Schedule 2” substitute “country specified in a list published by the Secretary of State from time to time”;
(b) in the definition of “third country conformity assessment body”, for “established in a country which is listed in Schedule 2 and designated in accordance with a relevant” substitute “designated in accordance with a”.
(4) Omit Schedule 2 (mutual recognition agreements).”
This new clause would amend the definition of “mutual recognition agreement” in the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (as it has effect in England and Wales, and Scotland) so that agreements are defined by a list published by the Secretary of State, rather than a Schedule to the regulations.
NC93
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Consultation about medicines and medical devices regulations
(1) Section 45 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (consultation) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), for “a provision of Part 1, 2, 3 or 4” substitute “Part 1 or 3”.
(3) After subsection (1) insert—
“(1ZA) Before making regulations under Part 2 or 4 the relevant authority must—
(a) carry out a public consultation, or
(b) consult such persons as it considers appropriate.”
(4) In subsection (3), at the beginning insert “Where a public consultation is carried out”.
(5) In subsection (4), in the words before paragraph (a), for “subsection (1)” substitute “subsection (1ZA)”.”
This amends the duty to consult in relation to regulations about human medicines and medical devices. It gives the option of consulting such persons as the relevant authority considers appropriate instead of a public consultation.
NC94
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medicines and medical devices regulations: parliamentary procedure
In section 47 of the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 (regulations: procedure), for subsection (3) substitute—
“(3) Regulations under Part 1 are subject to the draft affirmative procedure.
(3A) Regulations under Part 2—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision of one or more of the following descriptions—
(i) provision made in reliance on section 6(1)(a) (fees);
(ii) provision amending the meaning of “appropriate practitioner” or “approved country health professional” for the purposes of Part 12 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (see regulation 214 of those regulations);
(iii) provision amending any of the following provisions of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012—
• regulations 217C(3) or 217CA(3) (original pack dispensing for products containing relevant substances: definition of “relevant substance”),
• Schedule 13 (prescription only medicines for which community practitioner nurse prescribers are appropriate practitioners),
• Schedule 15 (requirements for specific products subject to general sale),
• Schedule 16 (patient group directions and vaccine group directions),
• Schedule 17 (exemption for sale, supply or administration by certain persons),
• Schedule 18 (substances that may not be sold or supplied by a pharmacist without a prescription in reliance on emergency provisions),
• Schedule 19 (medicinal products for parenteral administration in an emergency), or
• Schedule 21 (medicinal products at high dilutions);
(iv) provision amending regulation 250 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (restrictions on persons to be supplied with medicinal products: exceptions) for the purpose of changing the products to which any exception from time to time provided for by that regulation applies;
(v) provision that is consequential on provision of a description mentioned in any of sub-paragraphs (ii) to (iv);
(b) are subject to the made affirmative procedure if they—
(i) contain only provision that is made in reliance on section 7 (emergencies),
(ii) contain a declaration that the person making them considers that they need to be made urgently to protect the public from an imminent risk of serious harm to health, and
(iii) are not within paragraph (a);
(c) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within sub-paragraphs (a) or (b).
(3B) Regulations under Part 3—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision made in reliance on section 12(1)(a) (fees), and
(b) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a).
(3C) Regulations under Part 4—
(a) are subject to the negative procedure if they contain only provision of one or more of the following descriptions—
(i) provision made in reliance on—
• section 17(1)(a) (fees), or
• paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 (supplementary provision about civil sanctions);
(ii) provision amending or revoking regulation 1ZA of the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (expiry of certain provisions) or consequential on such provision;
(b) are subject to the made affirmative procedure if they—
(i) contain only provision made in reliance on section 18 (emergencies), and
(ii) contain a declaration that the person making them considers that they need to be made urgently to protect the public from an imminent risk of serious harm to health;
(c) are subject to the draft affirmative procedure if they are not within paragraph (a) or (b).””
This changes the parliamentary procedure for certain regulations from the draft affirmative procedure to the negative procedure. The changes all relate to regulations about medicines and medical devices (although the procedural provisions relating to certain other matters are restated in the amendment).
NC95
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Medical devices etc: parliamentary procedure for certain fees regulations
In Schedule 7 to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (regulations), in paragraph 12—
(a) in sub-paragraph (1) for “relate to altering the amount of a fee or charge to reflect changes in the value of money” substitute “fall within sub-paragraph (1A)”.
(b) after sub-paragraph (1) insert—
(1A)Provision falls within this sub-paragraph if it relates to—
(a)altering the amount of a fee or charge to reflect changes in the value of money,
(b)altering the amount of a fee or charge to be charged in connection with the exercise of a function which a public authority has by virtue of provision made under section 8C in connection with the EU medical devices Regulations, or
(c)altering the amount of a fee or charge to be charged under the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/50).
(1B)In sub-paragraph (1A)(b) “the EU medical devices Regulations” means—
(a)Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC, or
(b)Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU,
as they have effect from time to time by virtue of Article 5(4) of the Windsor Framework.””
This allows regulations altering certain fees in relation to medical devices etc to be made subject to the negative resolution procedure. At the moment those regulations are subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
NC96
Jim Dickson (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on dementia care
(1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish and lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia.
(b) the provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must have regard to—
(a) any targets or standards set out in a national plan, guidance, or framework relating to dementia services, and
(b) any other information the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) A report under subsection (1) must include—
(a) an assessment of variation in dementia services and outcomes between Integrated Care Board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers of dementia patients,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on the provision of NHS care and social care in relation to dementia.
83
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Schedule 11, page 191, line 35, at end insert—
“Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026
400 In Schedule 1 to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (relevant authorities)—
(a) omit paragraph 9;
(b) in paragraph 12, omit
“section 25 of”
.”
This is a consequential amendment to Schedule 1 to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026, which would remove a reference to NHS England and update a reference to NHS trusts to take account of the new conversion procedure created by clause 35 of the Bill.
NC97
Joe Robertson (Con)To move the following Clause—
“Publication of annual dementia care report
(1) The Secretary of State must publish annually and lay before Parliament a report on—
(a) the provision of NHS care in relation to dementia, and
(b) provision of social care in relation to dementia.
(2) In preparation of the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State must have regard to targets, standards and outcome measures set out in national plans, guidance and frameworks relating to dementia services.
(3) In preparation of the report under subsection (1), the Secretary of State may have regard to any such measures or information that they consider appropriate, including—
(a) an assessment of any variation in dementia services and outcomes between integrated care board areas,
(b) information on workforce capacity, capability and training standards relevant to dementia care,
(c) information on access to ongoing post-diagnostic support services, including support for unpaid carers,
(d) information on continuity and coordination of care for people living with dementia, including access to a named professional responsible for coordinating support across services,
(e) outcomes and experiences for people living with dementia and unpaid carers, including crisis prevention, carer wellbeing, and experiences of joined-up care,
(f) progress on dementia prevention and risk reduction, and
(g) dementia research activity in the NHS.
(4) The Secretary of State must publish the first such report under subsection (1) within 12 months of the passage of this Act.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to produce an annual report on the delivery of dementia care by the NHS and social care sectors against relevant national targets, standards and outcome measures.
NC98
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Response to the Hughes Report: options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh
The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report within 30 days of this Act being passed.
NC99
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1, at end insert—
“(2) Applicants eligible under this section shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(3) In section 2, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(4) In section 3, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.””
This new clause would create a requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors.
NC100
Joshua Reynolds (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Investment and Trade)To move the following Clause—
“Single patient record: review of flagging for early cancer diagnosis
(1) Within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before both Houses of Parliament a report on the feasibility of using patient records held by the health service to indicate, to a person providing health care to a patient, cases in which a patient has presented symptoms on more than one occasion which may indicate the presence of cancer.
(2) The report under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the potential for such indication to support early diagnosis of cancer in patients aged under 50 years of age, and
(b) any implications of such an indication requirement for clinical responsibility and patient safety.
(3) In preparing the report the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) NICE, and
(b) any other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to report on the feasibility of using patient records held by the health service to indicate, to a person providing health care to a patient, cases in which a patient has presented symptoms on more than one occasion which may indicate the presence of cancer.
NC101
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Plan to manage acquired brain injury
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish a plan for the management of acquired brain injury across England.
(2) A plan under subsection (1) must include but shall not be limited to—
(a) proposed government actions to prevent acquired brain injuries;
(b) proposed government actions to improve acute treatment for acquired brain injuries;
(c) a statement of priorities regarding the Secretary of State’s approach for rehabilitation and long-term support for persons with acquired brain injuries across public services delivered by—
(i) the Department for Health,
(ii) the Department for Education, and
(iii) the Ministry of Justice;
(d) proposals for data sharing between government departments, health care, and rehabilitation providers to improve patient—
(i) identification,
(ii) care,
(iii) support;
(e) a commitment providing 95% of people with complex needs with a personalised care plan by 2027;
(f) commitments for research into acquired brain injuries in sport;
(g) any proposed use of directions, guidance, financial assistance, incentives or other mechanisms to secure delivery of the plan’s objectives;
(h) workforce, diagnostic, digital and data requirements for implementation of the plan; and
(i) arrangements for monitoring, publishing and reporting progress against the plan.
(3) The plan under subsection (1) must be laid by the Secretary of State before both Houses of Parliament.
(4) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of publishing a plan under subsection (1), and every 12 months thereafter until 2030, lay before Parliament a report on progress made against the proposals and commitments in the plan.”
This new clause would require the Government to publish their action plan to manage acquired brain injury within 30 days of the passing of this Act.
NC102
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Response to the Hughes Report: options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh
The Secretary of State must, within 30 days of the day on which this Act is passed, publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish the government’s response to the Hughes Report within 30 days of this Act being passed.
NC103
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
(1) The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1, at end insert—
“(2) Applicants eligible under this section shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(3) In section 2, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.”
(4) In section 3, after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) Applicants eligible under subsection (1) shall be prioritised based on merit, determined by reference to the applicant’s—
(a) qualifications,
(b) professional competence,
(c) clinical experience,
(d) skills, and
(e) ability to perform the duties of the post.””
This new clause would create a requirement for merit-based job allocations for doctors
NC104
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Implementation of the Women's Health Strategy
(1) The Secretary of State must, within 90 days of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, publish a women's health implementation plan (the "implementation plan") setting out how the commitments in the document entitled "The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England" published on 15 April 2026 (or any successor document) will be delivered.
(2) The implementation plan must include, in particular—
(a) a timetable for delivering simpler access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC);
(b) a trajectory for reducing the gynaecology waiting list and for reducing average diagnosis times for endometriosis;
(c) a plan for establishing the regional specialist centres for group-based women's health pathways, including contraception, heavy periods, uro-gynaecology and menopause; and
(d) measurable targets and milestones for each commitment in the strategy, including a baseline and timetable for delivery.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay the implementation plan before Parliament on the day it is published.
(4) In preparing the implementation plan, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
(b) the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, and
(c) patient organisations representing women affected by the conditions addressed by the strategy.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a women's health implementation plan setting out how the commitments in the document entitled "The Renewed Women's Health Strategy for England will be delivered.
NC105
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Self-care and health literacy in neighbourhood health plans
(1) Guidance issued by the Secretary of State under section 14Z58 of the National Health Service Act 2006 as amended by section 24(4) of this Act (neighbourhood health plan) must require that every neighbourhood health plan includes arrangements for—
(a) supporting self-care and self-management, including by enabling people to manage minor and long-term conditions, and conditions that are self-limiting, themselves where it is safe and appropriate to do so;
(b) improving health literacy and ensuring that people living or working in the area have access to trusted, quality-assured information, advice and digital tools to support them in managing their own health and wellbeing;
(c) facilitating access to community pharmacy services, including pharmacy services that support self-care, the management of minor ailments and medicines optimisation;
(d) supporting patients to access the most appropriate level of care for their needs, including through patient-facing digital services connected to any system established under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (single patient record); and
(e) reducing avoidable demand on NHS services through the promotion of self-care and prevention.
(2) In preparing guidance under section 14Z58 of the National Health Service Act 2006 as amended by section 24(4) of this Act, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) improving health literacy;
(b) the role of community pharmacy as an accessible point of contact for self-care support and health advice; and
(c) the contribution of digital tools and patient-facing services to enabling self-care, self-management and appropriate care navigation.
(3) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, publish a self-care strategy for England (the "self-care strategy") which must set out—
(a) the national framework within which neighbourhood health plans will be required to embed self-care and self-management, including the management of self-limiting conditions, as a core component of local health and care services;
(b) the steps the Secretary of State will take to promote self-care and health literacy as part of the prevention and early intervention agenda across the NHS;
(c) the role of community pharmacy in delivering the self-care strategy, including the services and information that community pharmacy is expected to provide in support of self-care;
(d) the role of patient-facing digital services, including any system established under section 250E of the National Health Service Act 2006, in supporting self-care, self-management and navigation to appropriate care;
(e) the steps the Secretary of State will take to reduce avoidable demand on NHS services through the promotion of self-care; and
(f) the measurable outcomes against which progress in implementing the self-care strategy will be assessed, and the arrangements for reporting on progress.
(4) The Secretary of State must lay the self-care strategy before Parliament on the day on which it is published and must review and update it at intervals of not more than three years.
(5) In this section—
“neighbourhood health plan” has the same meaning as in section 24;
“self-care” means the actions taken by individuals to maintain their own health, manage minor or long-term conditions, including conditions that are self-limiting, and prevent ill health, including through the use of over-the-counter medicines, health information and digital tools.”
This new clause would require neighbourhood health plans to include arrangements for supporting self-care and self-management, including of minor and self-limiting conditions, and for improving health literacy. It would require guidance to the responsible local authority and integrated care boards to reflect these priorities, and would require the Secretary of State to publish a national self-care strategy setting out the framework, the role of community pharmacy and patient-facing digital services,
NC106
Caroline Johnson (Con) - Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)To move the following Clause—
“Safe and proportionate reclassification of medicines
Within 12 months of the date on which this Act receives Royal Assent, the Secretary of State must publish an assessment of—
(a) opportunities to support self-care and prevention through the reclassification of medicines,
(b) barriers to appropriate medicines reclassification within the current regulatory framework,
(c) the impact of medicines reclassification on patient access, NHS demand and productivity, and
(d) steps being taken to support a proportionate and agile regulatory framework for medicines reclassification whilst maintaining patient safety.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish an assessment in relation to the safe and proportionate reclassification of medicines.
78
Tessa Munt (LD)Clause 58, page 43, line 40, at end insert—
“1. (8B) Regulations under subsection (8A) must include provision about the period within which NICE guideline NG206 on myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) must be complied with.
2. (8D) The Secretary of State must publish an annual statement on compliance with NICE guideline NG206, including the extent to which integrated care boards and relevant NHS bodies have implemented recommendations relating to ME specialist services and severe or very severe ME.”
The amendment would require that a period must be set within which the NICE guideline NG206 on ME must be complied with by ICBs and other health bodies. Furthermore, the Secretary of State must publish an annual statement on compliance with NICE guideline NG206 across the NHS in England.
77
Helen Morgan (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Health and Social Care)Clause 68, page 47, line 27, leave out from “to” to the end of line 28 and insert “the affirmative procedure”
This amendment ensures that all secondary legislation as a result of this bill is subject to the affirmative procedure.
79
Anna Dixon (Lab)Clause 47, page 34, line 32, at end insert—
“(4A) In making the regulations the Secretary of State the Secretary of State must ensure that information in a single patient record is aligned with information from the Office of the Public Guardian regarding a patient’s—
(a) next of kin, or
(b) appointed legal representatives.”
This amendment would require the Secretary of State to ensure information in a single patient record is aligned with information from the Office of the Public Guardian regarding a patient’s next of kin or appointed legal representatives.
80
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 70, page 48, line 18, at end insert—
“(2A) Section (Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements) extends to England and Wales and Scotland.”
This is consequential on NC92.
81
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 71, page 48, line 25, leave out “Section 63” and insert “The following”.
This paves the way for Amendment 82.
82
Karin Smyth (Lab) - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)Clause 71, page 48, line 26, at end insert “—
(a) section 63 (Care Quality Commission: time limit for bringing proceedings);
(b) sections (Regulations: reference to agreements and standards), (Medical Devices Regulations 2002: mutual recognition agreements), (Consultation about medicines and medical devices regulations), (Medicines and medical devices regulations: parliamentary procedure), (Medical devices: parliamentary procedure for certain fees regulations).”
This provides for the new clauses listed to come into force 2 months after royal assent.
76
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)Clause 58, page 43, line 40, at end insert—
“(8B) Any period under subsection (8)(b) within which a recommendation is to be complied with may be no more than three months.”
NC73
Danny Chambers (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Mental Health)To move the following Clause—
“Review of arrangements between NHS bodies and local authorities
(1) The Secretary of State must conduct a review of arrangements entered into by NHS bodies and local authorities under section 75 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (Arrangements between NHS bodies and local authorities).
(2) In conducting the review, the Secretary of State must consult—
(a) NHS bodies,
(b) local authorities, and
(c) any other person that the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) Following the review, the Secretary of State must consider whether the power to make regulations in section 75(1) or the power to issue guidance in section 75(6) of the National Health Service Act 2006 should be exercised in order to improve the effectiveness of arrangements under that section.
(4) Consideration of arrangements under subsection (3) must include ensuring that financial and contractual arrangements align costs and benefits across relevant bodies.
(5) The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament, and publish, a report of the review.
(6) The report of the review must explain whether the Secretary of State decided to exercise the powers in section 75(1) and 75(6) of the National Health Service Act 2006 and the reasons for that decision.
(7) The Secretary of State must comply with the requirements of this section before the end of 12 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.”
This new clause aims to ensure that any review of section 75 arrangements explicitly considers whether regulations or guidance should be used to align costs and benefits across relevant bodies.
NC74
John Slinger (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Report on the abolition of Healthwatch England
(1) Within 12 months of the passage of this Act, the Secretary of State must lay a report before both Houses of Parliament on the impact of the abolition of Healthwatch England and transfer of Healthwatch England's functions to ICBs.
(2) The report must consider—
(a) the effectiveness of escalation routes for complaints,
(b) the ability to receive responses to complaints from the relevant ICB officer,
(c) accountability of ICB CEOs for delivering new functions arising from the abolition of Healthwatch;
(d) independence in the delivery of patient surveys, and
(e) ability to investigate organisations from which the ICB commissions services.
(3) The report must make recommendations about how any issues identified under subsection (2) may be mitigated.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to publish a report within 12 months of the passage of this Act on the impact of the abolition of Healthwatch England and transfer of Healthwatch England's functions to ICBs.
NC75
Tom Gordon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the abolition of NHS England takes effect, prepare and lay before Parliament a report setting out a transition strategy for the abolition of NHS England (the "strategy").
(2) The strategy must—
(a) identify and map critical functions and areas of expertise currently exercised by NHS England, including clinical, operational, analytical and patient engagement capabilities;
(b) assess the risk of loss of knowledge, skills and organisational capacity arising from the abolition of NHS England;
(c) set out the steps the Secretary of State proposes to take to ensure the retention and effective transfer of such functions, expertise, knowledge and skills; and
(d) assess the likely impact of the transition on the delivery of key health programmes and services, including cancer services.
(3) The Secretary of State must, at intervals of not more than 12 months, lay before Parliament a report on the implementation of the transition strategy.
(4) A report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) progress on workforce retention;
(b) arrangements for the transfer of knowledge, expertise and institutional capability; and
(c) any identified gaps in capability and the steps being taken to address them.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare and lay before Parliament a formal transition strategy before the abolition of NHS England, setting out how critical functions and expertise will be identified, retained and transferred. It would also require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament at least annually on the implementation of that strategy.
73
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Clause 29, page 21, leave out line 7
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
74
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Schedule 3, page 80, leave out paragraphs 5 to 8
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
75
Charlie Maynard (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Chief Secretary to the Treasury)Schedule 3, page 80, leave out paragraph 14
This amendment would retain the requirement for NHS Trusts to have a Council of Governors.
NC72
Zöe Franklin (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Local Government)To move the following Clause—
“Surrey & East Hampshire: Dental appointments
(1) Within one year beginning on the date on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must ensure that there is adequate provision of NHS dentistry in Surrey & East Hampshire.
(2) “Adequate provision” under subsection (1) means —
(a) access to urgent dental appointments for any person with an urgent need, and
(b) improved access to routine dental appointments.
(3) The Secretary of State must explain any failure to meet the requirement set out in subsection (1) at a public event in the local area.”
This new clause places a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure there is adequate provision of NHS dental appointments in Surrey & East Hampshire.
NC67
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Secretary of State directions relating to early access to medicines
(1) The Secretary of State may give directions to any of the bodies mentioned in subsection (2) about the implementation of a scheme providing early access to medicines to people with life-threatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
(2) The bodies are—
(a) integrated care board,
(b) NHS Trusts,
(c) NHS Foundation Trusts,
(d) NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts, and
(e) other health and social care bodies.”
This new clause would give the Secretary of State power to direct integrated care boards, NHS Trusts, NHS Foundation Trusts, and NHS Advanced Foundation Trusts to implement a scheme to provide early access to medicines to people with life-threatening or seriously debilitating conditions.
NC68
Freddie van Mierlo (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Review of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the passing of this Act, commission a review of the regime for early and accelerated access to medicines in England and Wales.
(2) The review conducted under subsection (1) must consider—
(a) the effectiveness of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) and Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP),
(b) the effectiveness of the early access outside of the Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) and Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP), and
(c) equality of access across England and Wales, with the aim of reducing geographical inequalities between different NHS trusts.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the report and recommendations of the review before both House of Parliament.”
This new clause would require the Secretary of State to commission a review of regime for early and accelerated access to medicines.
NC69
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“GP representation on integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must include as a member at least one individual who—
(a) is a registered medical practitioner, and
(b) has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
(2) In appointing a member under subsection (1) an integrated care board must have regard to the member’s potential contribution to improving—
(a) patient journeys across services,
(b) coordination and continuity of care,
(c) prevention and population health management, and
(d) integration of services at neighbourhood level.”
This new clause would ensure that each integrated care board includes at least one member who is a registered medical practitioner, and has current or recent experience of providing primary medical services under Part 4 of the National Health Service Act 2006.
NC70
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to engage primary care providers in integrated care boards
(1) An integrated care board must take all reasonable steps to secure the meaningful involvement of primary care providers in the exercise of its functions relating to—
(a) service redesign,
(b) integration of health services,
(c) development of neighbourhood health services, and
(d) population health planning.
(2) In this section, “primary care providers” includes—
(a) providers of primary medical services,
(b) community pharmacy contractors,
(c) providers of primary dental services, and
(d) providers of ophthalmic services.
(3) Under subsection (1), “meaningful involvement” includes—
(a) involvement at an early stage in the development of ICB proposals,
(b) provision of sufficient information to enable informed participation of primary care providers in ICB functions,
(c) opportunities for primary care providers to influence ICB decision-making, and
(d) opportunities for primary care providers to deliver feedback on how their views have been taken into account in the delivery of ICB functions.
(4) An integrated care board must publish an annual statement describing—
(a) how it has complied with this section, and
(b) the impact of primary care providers’ involvement on decisions taken by the ICB.
(5) The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the application of this section to which integrated care boards must have regard.”
This new clause ensures a certain range of primary care providers are consulted by integrated care boards in the development of their healthcare plans.
NC71
Helen Maguire (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Primary Care and Cancer)To move the following Clause—
“Duty of care for victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls
The Secretary of State and integrated care boards have a duty of care to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.”
This new clause would place a duty of care on the Secretary of State and integrated care boards to consider the needs of victims of domestic abuse and violence against women and girls when exercising their functions in relation to the provision of healthcare services.