Bills
Live Bills
Government Bills
Private Members' Bills
Acts of Parliament Created
Departments
Department for Business and Trade
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Department for Education
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Department of Health and Social Care
Department for Transport
Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Department for Work and Pensions
Cabinet Office
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Home Office
Leader of the House
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Ministry of Justice
Northern Ireland Office
Scotland Office
HM Treasury
Wales Office
Department for International Development (Defunct)
Department for Exiting the European Union (Defunct)
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Defunct)
Department for International Trade (Defunct)
Reference
User Guide
Stakeholder Targeting
Dataset Downloads
APPGs
Upcoming Events
The Glossary
2024 General Election
Learn the faces of Parliament
Petitions
Tweets
Publications
Written Questions
Parliamentary Debates
Parliamentary Research
Non-Departmental Publications
Secondary Legislation
MPs / Lords
Members of Parliament
Lords
Pricing
About
Login
Home
Live Debate
Lords Chamber
Lords Chamber
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
(began 51 minutes ago)
Share Debate
Copy Link
Watch Live
Print Debate (Subscribers only)
Skip to latest contribution
14:36
Royal Assent: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Act 2025; Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025; Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Act 2025; Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025
-
Copy Link
My My Lords, My Lords, I My Lords, I have My Lords, I have to My Lords, I have to notify My Lords, I have to notify the House in accordance with the Royal
Assent Act 1967, that His Majesty the King has signified his Royal
Assent to the following acts. Public Authorities, Fraud, Error
and Recovery Act 2025. Property. Digital Assets is cetera. Act 2025.
Animal welfare import of dogs, Cats
and Ferrets Act 20 2025 and Border Security, Asylum and Immigration
Act 2025.
And my Lords, I should like to notify the House of the
retirement with effect from the 2nd of December of the noble Baroness, Lady Stern, pursuant to section one
of the House of Lords Reform Act, 2014, and on behalf of the House, I
14:37
Oral questions: Cultural and heritage organisations: the right of consumers to cancel subscription contracts Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
should like to thank the noble Baroness for her much valued
service to the House. For, first of all, question Lord Morgan. My Lords, I beg leave to ask the question.
Standing in my name on the Order Paper. My Lords. Paper. My Lords.
14:37
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
The government has consulted on how the new subscription rules will work under the digital markets,
Competition and Consumer Consumers Act. This includes what happens when a consumer uses their cooling
off right to cancel, and are carefully reviewing responses from
cultural and heritage organisations. My officials have engaged directly
with sector representatives and will continue to do so to ensure the final regulations reflect their
concerns and support both consumer protection and organisational sustainability. sustainability.
14:38
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, I've had a number of exchanges with the noble Lord, the Minister for which I'm very
grateful. In considering next steps, will he take into account the worries expressed by charities,
arts and heritage organisations about the inevitable decimation of their fundraising efforts? Would he
agree? If you introduce the cooling off period set out in section 22 of the recently enacted DMCC
immediately on signing up. This would allow thousands of people to join, say, art galleries, take
advantage of the membership benefits of reduced admission fees to exhibitions over, say, a
weekends holiday in London, and then allow them legally to cancel their memberships under the cooling
off periods set out in section 22 of the new act, which will cripple their membership schemes as a
fundraising model.
Currently worth hundreds of millions of pounds to charities across the UK every year.
Would the government accelerate their consideration to exempt charities, museums, galleries and
national heritage homes? Just as the government has exempted gambling contracts and society
lotteries under section 22, in order to protect their fundraising efforts. efforts.
14:39
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, I mean, the noble Lord would know that under the Consumer
Contracts Regulations 2013, I mean, consumers already have a cooling off period for distance contracts.
So this is not new for the sector itself. The digital content waiver
is long established, and most charitable memberships are service
contracts, not digital content. We did consult on extending the waiver as that would reduce consumer
rights. Having said that, gambling is excluded due to the existing
specialist regulations.
My Lords, we recognise the concerns raised by charities and heritage
organisations about potential misuse and will continue to work
closely with charities as we finalise the secondary legislation.
14:40
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
-
Copy Link
-
Section 267 gives the government a clear ability to use the
regulating regulation, making powers to recognise the specific circumstances for particular
services such as streaming, charitable memberships and of course, the news media. My Lords,
does the government intend to make the distinctions between those
different sectors, my Lords? And if so, will the government make sure that those streaming services,
charitable sector, and indeed the news media are protected? My Lords,
from early termination.
14:40
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
The noble Lord makes a very interesting point. Let's let's look
at a policy. I mean, basically what we're trying to do is the unwanted subscriptions that we're talking
about, which are accounts at £1.6 billion a year. So this is
regulation or this act itself actually will save consumer something like £14 a month and some
close to about £147 million a year. So it look, as it stands now under
consumer law, all charities or
other charities have to comply with consumer law irrespective of
charitable status itself.
And no companies currently, especially the
digital service organisations, have got the legislation that's
currently in place. So that will stay as it is. And as far as the cooling off period under the new
act itself is just an extension from distance learning to in person.
14:41
The Earl of Devon (Crossbench)
-
Copy Link
-
Count for the concerns of
**** Possible New Speaker ****
privately owned heritage. The majority of members of historic houses, for example, are
neither charities nor large heritage organisations, yet they're wholly dependent upon subscriptions and membership for the preservation
and membership for the preservation of our nationally significant heritage. And I note my interests as a member of historic houses.
14:41
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
**** Possible New Speaker ****
as a member of historic houses. I thank the Lord for that. Now,
as far as heritage organisations concerned, it's up to the individual organisation itself as to how their business model is
structured. If it's a subscription model for contract of services,
then it falls in scope of this legislation and the cooling off period will apply. period will apply.
14:42
Lord Waldegrave of North Hill (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
For my noble friend and also welcome the tone of the Minister's thoughtful reply. As a proud member
of the British Museum scheme, I do think there is a loophole, an
unintended consequence of the good intention of the act which does need support. So may I assure the
Minister that he will have widespread support in this House, if he can find a way through this problem? Yes. problem? Yes.
14:42
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I think the noble Lord for that. And this is precisely why the government is taking its time. We
have consulted widely. The consultation finished at the end of February. We are analysing the
responses and because it actually has got various complexities, it
also impacts on HMRC as far as gifted is concerned. So we've got to ensure that we get this
absolutely right and we will make a decision in time in due course.
14:43
Lord Watts (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
While we're on this subject,
isn't it the case that our regulators and our consumer rights are letting Britain down? And when
we in what we call rip off Britain, don't we need to look at regulation and also and consumer rights in the
whole and come forward with a package to actually address the problems? problems?
14:43
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
My noble friend is absolutely right. I mean, as it stands, all consumers are protected under the
Consumer Contracts Regulation, which basically allows consumers to
have that cooling off period if they subscribe to a service online.
What this legislation does is to extend it to subscription in person, so consumers will be protected
under this legislation.
14:43
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
As a trustee of the National Portrait Gallery. Can I say to the
Minister, this is particularly important because the Red book last week shows that in the latter part
of this decade, DCMS budget is going to fall, which means that public institutions are going to be under greater financial pressure.
The last thing they need, therefore, is an issue of this kind. And can I
offer my support to my noble friend and urge the Minister to do everything he can to get rid of this anomaly? this anomaly?
14:44
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I thank the Lord for that. It's precisely what we're doing. We are taking our time to consider the
consultation. We're analysing the response and we have to get this right. I mean, charities to, as I
said earlier, have to comply with current consumer protection
regulation. And now I think as it stands, I mean most charities because they do not perhaps don't
understand the implication of the Consumer Contracts Act have been claiming gift aid, even though
their membership may be for a certain provision of services.
So
we need to ensure that HMRC and DCMS and all that work through the technicalities so that we actually
are not caught in this loophole which the noble Lord mentioned. which the noble Lord mentioned.
14:45
Lord Bird (Crossbench)
-
Copy Link
-
Can I just ask, are you actually asking for reluctant subscribers to
stay with you just because you're a charity? I find that really, really difficult to understand because we
have to think of that person who goes in and looks at something and
says, I don't really want to be a part of this and chooses and they should have a right to do that.
14:45
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
Currently, every consumer has got a right to do that under the
current consumer protection. They have a cooling off period of 14 days to cancel their subscription.
If the subscription is done currently by distance subscription
under the new act, if the subscription is taken up or renewed
in person. The cooling off period is extended to 14 days, so consumers will have the right to
cancel or stay within the subscription.
14:45
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, the problem has been
well set up by my noble friend Lord Moynihan and just repeated admirably by by the Minister. It is a problem that was identified when
this now act was going through your Lordships' House, and at the time my noble friend Lord Offord of Garvel committed to close this
loophole through secondary legislation. Of course, the elections interceded, but that is now a year and a half ago. This is
a pressing issue, as we've heard, for organisations that are beset by cuts to the DCMS budget, the rising
impact of National Insurance contributions and much more.
So will the Minister commit to working urgently to make sure this loophole
is not open in a way that will affect so many arts and cultural and heritage organisations that are
loved across the country.
14:46
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I know a lot for that, and I can assure the noble Lord that myself
and my officials are working to ensure that we get this right under the new subscription regime will
ensure that in particular situations, including after the contract automatically renews onto
a 12 month subscription term. Consumers have a 14 day window to
cancel it, so should any changes be needed. This secondary legislation
will commit itself and will also be published in the secondary legislation, that it does not commence until autumn 2026, so
there's plenty of time for charities and heritage organisations to put their, I
suppose, house in order before this regime kicks in.
May I offer.
14:47
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
The Minister an opportunity to
be popular by moving the regulations further on online
subscriptions, so that all of those who are subject to automatic
renewals do not have to click more than twice in order to end a subscription that they don't want
to retain.
14:47
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I thank the noble Lord for that kind suggestion, and I'm sure my officials are sending me a box.
I've just heard him.
14:47
Oral questions: Adults with learning and communication difficulties: online communications for access to public services Lord Cashman (Non-affiliated)
-
Copy Link
Second oral question Lord Cashman my Lords, I beg leave to
ask the question. Standing in my name on the Order Paper.
14:48
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, digital inclusion is a priority for this government, which is why we launched the Digital
Inclusion Action Plan. It sets out immediate steps to boost inclusion
for everyone, including people with disabilities in the NHS. We recognise that some patients may struggle or prefer not to use
digital routes. That is why GP practices are required to maintain
traditional methods of access. While digital health services are being designed to be inclusive,
accessible and easy to navigate.
14:48
Lord Cashman (Non-affiliated)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lord, I thank the noble Lords
Minister for the reply, but the reality, I'm afraid, is very different. The negative effects on
vulnerable people and people with learning difficulties accessing services online is deeply
problematic. Many do not have access to the internet. Some cannot read or write. Others simply do not
have capacity to deal with online programs and apps. Many are
isolated in poor health and desperately in need of support, yet
cannot get it because of these online obstacles.
So I ask the noble Lord, the Minister, will the
government improve online access for these people and others and
make it easily and widely available? Will they adopt more voice messaging, voice prompts as well as
simple to use spoken menu options? And indeed, dare I say, my Lords,
the option to speak to a human being. These issues of online
access must be addressed if we are to tackle the hopelessness that is growing around access to public
services, and particularly access to services within the NHS.
to services within the NHS.
14:49
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lord, I thank my noble friend for that. Look, we recognise that
not everyone can manage complex digital systems. We acknowledge that. And some vulnerable people
risk becoming cut off as services change. My departments across
government are reviewing digital pathways to make them simpler, clearer and supported by voice
prompts. As the noble Lord mentioned and voice activated tools,
we are also expanding. Easy to navigate menus and keeping the option to speak to trained staff.
We aim to give people the support they need and to keep every route open, not closed.
14:50
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I wonder if I can intervene. As
chair of the Digital Inclusion Action Committee. I've just spent the last hour talking with two
subcommittee chairs. The Minister may want to know precisely about
easier accessibility, but also about a report that has recently
been done for people with learning difficulties. And we want to make sure that we start with where the
person is and what their service
needs are. And my goodness, I wish that that that is how public services have been organised so far
before digital ever came in.
And what we are determined to do is
give the government options. Firstly on accessibility, to make
that much more straightforward, but also to make sure departments
support carers as well as individuals in particular groups,
so that they are able to get the best from whatever service they
need in whatever service is going to suit them as individuals most effectively.
14:51
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
Well, firstly, may I thank my noble friend for all the work that
she's doing on the Digital Inclusion Inclusion Action Committee, and she's absolutely
right. I mean, she's bringing all the leaders from government, industry and voluntary sector to
shape our national response to digital inclusion. And her committee is currently setting out
its priorities and gathering insights from across the UK to inform recommendations to the
government. And the government have set up the Inclusion Action Plan with a focus on practical action,
and I emphasise practical actions that make a difference to people's
lives.
14:52
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
-
Copy Link
-
I know.
life. More than half are disabled people. And of course, the barriers
created by digital approaches everywhere increase those barriers that disabled people face. What
steps is the government taking specifically to ensure that the NHS app is accessible to people who
have learning and communication difficulties, and to ensure that
NHS services are still available to those who cannot use digital means of communication. of communication.
14:52
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
I thank the noble Baroness for that and as I mentioned in my
earlier comment, I mean, we are not closing off any of the options that
are available, whether the the voice activated system or speaking to a human being. I mean, the
option is still there. We we know that millions of people in the UK are still unable to take part in
this increasingly digital society, and that digital exclusion falls
hardest on disabled people. We recognise that, and that's why this government is committed to
improving digital inclusion for everybody.
In August, we've launched 9.5 million Digital
Inclusion Innovation Fund, which supports community projects across
the country and helps people build the skills and confidence they need to get online.
14:53
Lord Hayward (Conservative)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, can I pick up on the comment by Lord Cashman.
people, voice to voice, blind spots
exist in the web. The web crashes on many occasions. So it is not
those unfortunate people who are disabled or don't have links who lose contact with vital services.
It can on many occasions be far broader, and every service should
have the access to a human talking to a human. Yeah, absolutely. to a human. Yeah, absolutely.
14:54
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
My Lords, I mean, digital progress must never, never mean
less choice. The NHS continues to provide face to face routes, telephone access and supported
appointments for those who really need them or to need them. We are investing in accessible contact
centres, clearer phone menus and trained staff who can actually guide patients through the next
steps. At the same time, we are also improving simpler digital options for those who want them. So,
in line with the action plan, we are keeping non-digital routes open
and strengthening assisted support.
14:55
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
-
Copy Link
-
The Minister.
**** Possible New Speaker ****
Needs a reality check for many people, moving to digital is not
people, moving to digital is not acceptable and the NHS ten year plan moves from analogue to digital and more services. Moving to the
and more services. Moving to the NHS app for people with a learning disability. Issues regarding poor
disability. Issues regarding poor communication. At present only come to light inquest's not through
to light inquest's not through central government monitoring. So could I ask the noble Lord, the Minister, what new central
government monitoring will the government introduce to make sure that existing communication meets vulnerable people's needs, rather
14:55
Lord Leong (Labour)
-
Copy Link
-
**** Possible New Speaker ****
vulnerable people's needs, rather than moving to digital, which will cause further problems? Noble makes an interesting point
and that's why I mentioned earlier my noble friend Baroness Armstrong
is working right across government departments, bringing everybody together, looking at what's available and ensuring that nobody
is excluded from digital services. And as I said earlier, the current
situation where someone can actually speak to a human being is
Feed Live - Click to view video