Joined House of Lords: 9th September 2020
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Lord Moylan, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
A Bill to require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on complications from abortions in England; and for connected purposes.
A Bill to make provision for a Foetal Sentience Committee to review current understanding of the sentience of the human foetus and to inform policy-making; and for connected purposes.
A Bill to require the Secretary of State to publish an annual report on complications from abortions in England; and for connected purposes.
Lord Moylan has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting
Since its establishment in 2020, the Restoration and Renewal (R&R) Delivery Authority has developed a 3D Building Information Model of the Palace of Westminster for the purposes of the R&R Programme. This model is able to generate drawings and plans of any part of the building, as well as enable digital rehearsals prior to physical works taking place.
The Government is committed to extending mandatory pay gap reporting to ethnicity and disability pay gaps for employers with at least 250 employees. It is also committed to ensuring the Public Sector Equality Duty covers all parties exercising public functions.
The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.
Please see the letter attached from the Director General for Office for Statistics Regulation.
Ed Humpherson, Director General for Office for Statistics Regulation
The Lord Moylan
House of Lords
London
SW1A 0PW
19 December 2024
Dear Lord Moylan,
As Director General for Office for Statistics Regulation, I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking when His Majesty's Government plan to update the assessment of abortion statistics by the UK Statistics Authority in order to comply with the Code of Practice for Statistics (HL3549).
The Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) was established in 2016 and is the regulatory arm of the UK Statistics Authority (the Authority). OSR provides independent regulation of all official statistics produced in the UK. Before 2016, the Authority's Monitoring and Assessment team handled regulatory functions.
Accredited Official Statistics are official statistics that have been independently assessed by OSR to comply with the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value in the Code of Practice for Statistics. Accredited Official Statistics are called National Statistics in the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007.
Abortions Statistics for England and Wales produced by the Office for Health Improvement & Disparities (OHID, was previously Department of Health) were assessed as complying with the Code of Practice for Statistics in February 2012, and National Statistics designation was awarded[1].
It is a requirement of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 that the Code of Practice must continue to be complied with by the statistics producer in relation to the statistics. OSR regularly engages with the Head of Profession for Statistics for the Department of Health and Social Care to obtain general assurance on the Department’s compliance with the Code of Practice, but the OSR team has not discussed the abortion statistics specifically in these conversations.
Once a set of statistics has been assessed, OSR can re-assess them at any time. Reassessments can be initiated as a result of concerns raised with us by users, including citizens, academic experts and policy stakeholders. While we do not currently have any plans to re-assess the abortion statistics in this financial year, we are always open to hearing the concerns of people with an interest in the topic area.
To that end, if you have any concerns regarding the trustworthiness, quality and value of these abortion statistics not complying with the Code of Practice for Statistics, please do contact me through our general contact email regulation@statistics.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely
Ed Humpherson
Director General for OSR
[1]Statistics on Abortion: Letter of Confirmation as National Statistics, https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/statistics-on-abortion-letter-of-confirmation-as-national-statistics/
The impugned legislation in Podchasov v. Russia is not directly comparable to the Online Safety Act, which contains robust protections for privacy and freedom of expression. A memorandum on ECHR compatibility was published during Bill passage.
Section 121 of the Act contains stringent safeguards ensuring that Ofcom’s power to issue Technology Notices, including relating to child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) content communicated privately, can only be used when necessary and proportionate. Ofcom must consider a range of matters, including whether there are less intrusive alternatives, the harm to individuals and the required technology’s ability to achieve the purpose described.
The Charity Commission’s role as the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales is to ensure that charity trustees comply with their duties as set out in charity law. The Charity Commission has published guidance for trustees on the use of social media and managing the risks for charities.
The Charity Commission notes the Tribunal’s judgment in this recent case, and is considering what lessons can be applied to future casework.
In the last five years, the Charity Commission has disqualified six individuals in cases that relate to the usage of social media. An individual’s use of social media was the sole basis for disqualification in three cases, while in the other three it was one of several grounds.
The Commission’s decisions to disqualify are subject to robust oversight and can be appealed through review by an independent member of Commission staff, and subsequently to the First Tier Tribunal.
The Charity Commission is independent from the Government in its regulatory decision making.
Departmental settlements have been set following the Budget announcement on October 30. Individual programmes will now be assessed during the departmental Business Planning process.
Students on Erasmus+ placements are exempt from tuition and registration fees at their host institution.
This means that EU nationals who previously came to the UK through Erasmus+ would not have taken out UK student loans, as their placements were supported through Erasmus+ funding.
The Department for Transport does not hold data on what proportion of zero-emission Heavy Goods Vehicles currently available for purchase in the United Kingdom are manufactured in the United Kingdom.
There is no national standardised definition of a road surface.
The Network Rail / British Transport Police’s National Disruption Fusion Unit can supply Schedule 8 (delay report) costs for external (XA) trespass for the following:
The combined figure is £218,374,921.
The annual (by financial year) breakdown is as follows:
2023/24 | £ 71,856,452 |
2024/25 | £ 73,165,870 |
2025/26 | £ 73,352,599 |
The Department does not hold this information. Covering staff sickness is an operational matter for the train operating companies.
Network Rail does not hold data on the cost of damage repair costs relating to rail trespass incidents.
Rail industry stakeholders work together – including across Network Rail, this Department, the Office of Rail and Road and the train operators – to share information and data to support efforts to combat rail trespass. This includes the Office of Rail and Road’s data on delay compensation claims and the Department’s data on rail passenger compensation paid by train companies. Network Rail is currently running the No Second Chances campaign, to address safety incidents at level crossings and trespass.
Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor and Transport for London, as such the Government has made no assessment of the number of working days lost across the broader London commuter base as a result of industrial action by members of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers on the London Underground since 1 April 2026.
The Government has made no assessment of the total direct cost to the United Kingdom economy of industrial action on the London Underground since 1 April 2026 due to London Transport being devolved.
Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor and Transport for London, as such the Government has made no assessment of the number of working days lost across the broader London commuter base as a result of industrial action by members of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers on the London Underground since 1 April 2026.
The Government has made no assessment of the total direct cost to the United Kingdom economy of industrial action on the London Underground since 1 April 2026 due to London Transport being devolved.
Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor and Transport for London. Any impacts of strike action on London’s transport network are for TfL to assess and manage.
In January this year Network Rail reached a pay settlement with its general grades staff at 3.8% along with delivery of efficiency improvements.
These efficiency improvements relate to changes in working practices and modernisation initiatives agreed between Network Rail and the trade unions to support a more sustainable and reliable railway.
The Government supports pay settlements which are fair, affordable and deliver value for taxpayers and farepayers
A yellow front is a safety requirement on many trains, however modern lighting systems mean this is no longer strictly required on newer trains such as the Elizabeth Line fleet. Several operators moving into GBR use the same train model as is used on the Elizabeth Line, and last month I unveiled the first of that model to carry the GBR livery at London Waterloo. When applying the GBR livery to a train type, the decision on whether to retain a yellow front is being taken on a case‑by‑case basis balancing safety considerations, cost and durability, alongside the need for a clear and recognisable design for passengers.
Local highway authorities are responsible for maintaining their roads under section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. Individual authorities set their own criteria, including the minimum size and depth at which a defect, or pothole, is recorded or repaired, and apply risk‑based assessments that account for local conditions, traffic volumes and safety considerations when making decisions on maintenance programmes. These thresholds therefore vary between areas and are not prescribed by the Department for Transport.
This approach is based on the Well‑managed Highway Infrastructure Code of Practice, which advises that local highway authorities should use a risk‑based approach when assessing and repairing defects, and recommends that each authority determine its own intervention criteria based on local circumstances rather than a single national threshold.
The number of rail trespass incidents is presented in the following table:
Rail Period | Start Date | End Date | Incidents |
2023/24_P10 | 10 December 2023 | 06 January 2024 | 668 |
2023/24_P11 | 07 January 2024 | 03 February 2024 | 771 |
2023/24_P12 | 04 February 2024 | 02 March 2024 | 902 |
2023/24_P13 | 03 March 2024 | 31 March 2024 | 1030 |
2024/25_P01 | 01 April 2024 | 27 April 2024 | 1040 |
2024/25_P02 | 28 April 2024 | 25 May 2024 | 1212 |
2024/25_P03 | 26 May 2024 | 22 June 2024 | 1247 |
2024/25_P04 | 23 June 2024 | 20 July 2024 | 1285 |
2024/25_P05 | 21 July 2024 | 17 August 2024 | 1272 |
2024/25_P06 | 18 August 2024 | 14 September 2024 | 1163 |
2024/25_P07 | 15 September 2024 | 12 October 2024 | 1022 |
2024/25_P08 | 13 October 2024 | 09 November 2024 | 984 |
2024/25_P09 | 10 November 2024 | 07 December 2024 | 780 |
2024/25_P10 | 08 December 2024 | 04 January 2025 | 701 |
2024/25_P11 | 05 January 2025 | 01 February 2025 | 784 |
2024/25_P12 | 02 February 2025 | 01 March 2025 | 905 |
2024/25_P13 | 02 March 2025 | 31 March 2025 | 1216 |
2025/26_P01 | 01 April 2025 | 26 April 2025 | 1240 |
2025/26_P02 | 27 April 2025 | 24 May 2025 | 1243 |
2025/26_P03 | 25 May 2025 | 21 June 2025 | 1279 |
2025/26_P04 | 22 June 2025 | 19 July 2025 | 1318 |
2025/26_P05 | 20 July 2025 | 16 August 2025 | 1221 |
2025/26_P06 | 17 August 2025 | 13 September 2025 | 1125 |
2025/26_P07 | 14 September 2025 | 11 October 2025 | 1067 |
2025/26_P08 | 12 October 2025 | 08 November 2025 | 969 |
2025/26_P09 | 09 November 2025 | 06 December 2025 | 740 |
2025/26_P10 | 07 December 2025 | 03 January 2026 | 735 |
2025/26_P11 | 04 January 2026 | 31 January 2026 | 743 |
2025/26_P12 | 01 February 2026 | 28 February 2026 | 925 |
2025/26_P13 | 01 March 2026 | 31 March 2026 | 1316 |
The above information has been provided by Network Rail. Information is collated by rail periods (as shown) rather than on a monthly basis.
Network Rail estimates the long-term revenue loss due to those incidents. Network Rail does not hold direct cost information (in terms of Delay Repay costs, damage repair, etc) relating to an incident.
Each train operating company currently records this information in a different way – some by days lost and some by percentage absence rate. The figures below have been collated by DFT Operator. Figures cover periods in public ownership only.
Table 1:
Absences by days lost, presented by Rail Period
(Northern, TransPennine Trains, South Western Railway)
| NORTHERN | TPT | SWR |
P11 2023 (broadly Jan 24) | 7496 | 1881 |
|
P12 2023 (Feb 24) | 7759 | 1785 |
|
P13 2023 (Mar 24) | 7532 | 1548 |
|
P1 2024 (Apr 24) | 7291 | 1597 |
|
P2 2024 (Apr / May 24) | 7569 | 1724 |
|
P3 2024 (May / Jun 24) | 7954 | 1602 |
|
P4 2024 (Jun / Jul 24) | 8506 | 1769 |
|
P5 2024 (Jul / Aug 24) | 8243 | 1673 |
|
P6 2024 (Aug / Sep 24) | 7778 | 1669 |
|
P7 2024 (Sep / Oct 24) | 8196 | 1646 |
|
P8 2024 (Oct / Nov 24) | 8394 | 1571 |
|
P9 2024 (Nov / Dec 24) | 8472 | 1524 |
|
P10 2024 (Dec 24 / Jan 25) | 8827 | 1756 |
|
P11 2024 (Jan 25) | 8152 | 1611 |
|
P12 2024 (Feb 25) | 7797 | 1410 |
|
P13 2024 (Mar 25) | 7345 | 1451 |
|
P1 2025 (Apr 25) | 7030 | 1541 |
|
P2 2025 (Apr / May 25) | 7443 | 1546 |
|
P3 2025 (May / Jun 25) | 7420 | 1576 | 1055 |
P4 2025 (Jun / Jul 25) | 7578 | 1557 | 5175 |
P5 2025 (Jul / Aug 25) | 7976 | 1937 | 5727 |
P6 2025 (Aug / Sep 25) | 8097 | 1937 | 5916 |
P7 2025 (Sep / Oct 25) | 8033 | 2045 | 5130 |
P8 2025 (Oct / Nov 25) | 8113 | 2226 | 5453 |
P9 2025 (Nov 25 / Dec 25) | 8663 | 2122 | 4997 |
P10 2025 (Dec 25 / Jan 26) | 8986 | 2034 | 5471 |
P11 2025 (Jan 26) | 8578 | 1944 | 5416 |
P12 2025 (Feb 26) | 8281 | 1767 | 4741 |
P13 2025 (Mar 26) | 7824 | 1665 | 5091 |
P1 2026 (Apr 26) | 8056 | 1744 | 4533 |
Table 2:
Absences by days lost, presented by calendar month
(Southeastern)
| SOUTHEASTERN |
Feb-24 | 5692 |
Mar-24 | 5369 |
Apr-24 | 5205 |
May-24 | 5330 |
Jun-24 | 4700 |
Jul-24 | 5783 |
Aug-24 | 5418 |
Sep-24 | 5482 |
Oct-24 | 6279 |
Nov-24 | 5510 |
Dec-24 | 6302 |
Jan-25 | 6678 |
Feb-25 | 5594 |
Mar-25 | 5309 |
Apr-25 | 5368 |
May-25 | 5144 |
Jun-25 | 5064 |
Jul-25 | 5714 |
Aug-25 | 5029 |
Sep-25 | 5717 |
Oct-25 | 5903 |
Nov-25 | 5341 |
Dec-25 | 6531 |
Jan-26 | 5879 |
Feb-26 | 4756 |
Mar-26 | 5533 |
Apr-26 | 5374 |
Table 3:
Absences by percentage, presented by Rail Period
(LNER, c2c, Greater Anglia, West Midlands Trains)
| LNER | c2c | GA | WMT |
P11 2023 (broadly Jan 24) | 6.46% |
|
|
|
P12 2023 (Feb 24) | 5.91% |
|
|
|
P13 2023 (Mar 24) | 5.25% |
|
|
|
P1 2024 (Apr 24) | 5.35% |
|
|
|
P2 2024 (Apr / May 24) | 5.56% |
|
|
|
P3 2024 (May / Jun 24) | 5.34% |
|
|
|
P4 2024 (Jun / Jul 24) | 5.25% |
|
|
|
P5 2024 (Jul / Aug 24) | 6.06% |
|
|
|
P6 2024 (Aug / Sep 24) | 5.96% |
|
|
|
P7 2024 (Sep / Oct 24) | 5.66% |
|
|
|
P8 2024 (Oct / Nov 24) | 6.33% |
|
|
|
P9 2024 (Nov / Dec 24) | 6.48% |
|
|
|
P10 2024 (Dec 24 / Jan 25) | 7.34% |
|
|
|
P11 2024 (Jan 25) | 7.05% |
|
|
|
P12 2024 (Feb 25) | 5.86% |
|
|
|
P13 2024 (Mar 25) | 5.43% |
|
|
|
P1 2025 (Apr 25) | 5.15% |
|
|
|
P2 2025 (Apr / May 25) | 5.15% |
|
|
|
P3 2025 (May / Jun 25) | 5.08% |
|
|
|
P4 2025 (Jun / Jul 25) | 5.31% |
|
|
|
P5 2025 (Jul / Aug 25) | 5.75% | 5.49% |
|
|
P6 2025 (Aug / Sep 25) | 5.84% | 6.45% |
|
|
P7 2025 (Sep / Oct 25) | 5.97% | 5.56% | 4.68% |
|
P8 2025 (Oct / Nov 25) | 5.88% | 4.74% | 4.39% |
|
P9 2025 (Nov 25 / Dec 25) | 6.24% | 3.73% | 5.06% |
|
P10 2025 (Dec 25 / Jan 26) | 7.08% | 4.34% | 5.09% |
|
P11 2025 (Jan 26) | 7.36% | 3.93% | 5.04% |
|
P12 2025 (Feb 26) | 7.36% | 3.18% | 4.71% | 6.72% |
P13 2025 (Mar 26) | 6.94% | 3.24% | 4.82% | 7.09% |
P1 2026 (Apr 26) | 6.35% | 4.68% | 4.78% | 5.09% |
Chiltern worked with Network Rail, DfT and other operators on the December 2026 timetable and services have been timetabled between Oxford, Winslow, Bletchley and Milton Keynes. The Department continues to work closely with Chiltern Railways and other partners to confirm a start date for the first East-West Rail services between Oxford and Milton Keynes Central via Winslow.
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) publishes driving instructor and motorcycle instructor register data online.
The below table shows the number of approved driving instructors (ADI) on the official register in each month since July 2024. Please note, DVSA can currently only publish data up to September 2025.
Date | Number of ADIs on register |
July 2024 | 41,207 |
August 2024 | 41,366 |
September 2024 | 41,453 |
October 2024 | 41,615 |
November 2024 | 41,832 |
December 2024 | 41,900 |
January 2025 | 42,146 |
February 2025 | 42,330 |
March 2025 | 42,401 |
April 2025 | 42,513 |
May 2025 | 42,825 |
June 2025 | 42,881 |
July 2025 | 43,020 |
August 2025 | 43,559 |
September 2025 | 43,334 |
On 19 May, the Secretary of State for Transport updated Parliament on the progress of the HS2 reset, alongside the publication of her latest parliamentary report.
In addition, the government published the initial findings of HS2 Ltd CEO Mark Wild’s review into the simplification of the railway’s operational specification, and his advice on the estimated cost of cancelling and remediating the programme.
As Mark Wild said before the TSC on 20 May, the HS2 reset will continue to progress and is planned to complete in Spring 2027 when the full delivery baseline is expected to be completed, a new commercial strategy to be implemented, and HS2 Ltd to be reshaped into a leaner, more skilled organisation.
To ensure a smooth transition from today’s access and charging regime to the new access and charging framework under Great British Railways (GBR), Network Rail System Operator (NRSO) were commissioned to develop a draft Access and Use Policy for consultation on behalf of GBR. NRSO has led a highly collaborative and transparent process in the development of this important work. This includes publishing a Discussion Document last December that set out emerging thinking for further engagement and policy development on key areas such as capacity allocation, timetabling, setting of access charges and managing performance alongside frequent engagement with the industry.
A full draft of the Access and Use Policy is expected to be published by NRSO later this year which will give industry an opportunity to formally provide comments and responses before Great British Railways is fully established.
Please see the attached document which contains the information requested.
Staff transferred from the Department for Transport (DfT) to DfT Operator are based in a range of office locations, including Network Rail premises in Waterloo and other locations across the country. NR and DFTO are separate companies with different legal duties. On the journey to GBR they are co-locating and working closely together - for example co-designing GBR with DfT - to ensure that benefits for customers and taxpayers can be delivered as soon as possible.
Thank you for your continued interest in this project; we are still developing the proposition and preparing for the procurement. The procurement process will involve engagement with suppliers which will be commercially sensitive, so sharing costs at this stage would not be appropriate. We will provide updates at the appropriate time.
The Department understands that discussions continue between Chiltern Railways and the relevant trade unions on the operational arrangements for the first phase of East West Rail. Once this has been resolved, and other preparatory works on the trains and infrastructure have been completed, it will be possible to determine an expected start date for the new services.
Clause 3 of the Railway’s Bill sets out the statutory functions of GBR – what we expect it to do, and Clause 18 its general duties – what we expect it to consider when it is delivering on its functions. Taken together, the functions and duties already set out GBR’s fundamental purpose.
Further, the Railways Bill requires the Secretary of State for Transport to issue the Long-Term Rail Strategy (LTRS), which is the first strategy of its kind. It will set out strategic objectives for the railway over a 30-year period.
The Department for Transport's support for the 14 contracted operators and Network Rail was £8.47 per journey in 2024/25. It is currently estimated that this will steadily decrease to circa £7.40 per journey in 2028/29.
Network Rail is responsible for assessing the availability of specialist rail plant used in maintaining the rail network. It is currently reviewing its long-term equipment requirements for track maintenance and renewals, to ensure that it has the capacity, flexibility, and technology it needs to meet future demand efficiently.
The table below shows the total expenditure on the maintenance of the rail network in the past six financial years and its proportion of the total expenditure.
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
Maintenance | 1,737 | 1,892 | 1,947 | 2,089 | 2,290 | 2,504 |
Operations | 657 | 714 | 717 | 716 | 812 | 892 |
Support | 662 | 956 | 968 | 1,019 | 1,157 | 1,099 |
Traction Electricity, Industry Costs and Rates | 798 | 845 | 860 | 979 | 1,103 | 1,322 |
Total Operating Expenditure | 3,854 | 4,407 | 4,492 | 4,803 | 5,362 | 5,817 |
Maintenance Share | 45% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 43% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewals | 2,908 | 3,910 | 3,948 | 4,046 | 3,930 | 3,683 |
Maintenance share in OMR | 26% | 23% | 23% | 24% | 25% | 26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhancements | 1,824 | 1,620 | 1,787 | 2,011 | 2,267 | 2,084 |
Total Operating and Capital Expenditure | 8,586 | 9,937 | 10,227 | 10,860 | 11,559 | 11,584 |
Maintenance Share | 20% | 19% | 19% | 19% | 20% | 22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Costs and Tax | 2,105 | 1,748 | 2,783 | 4,085 | 2,583 | 2,498 |
Total Expenditure | 10,691 | 11,685 | 13,010 | 14,945 | 14,142 | 14,082 |
Maintenance Share | 16% | 16% | 15% | 14% | 16% | 18% |
Source: Network Rail’s published Regulatory Financial Statements.
Officials continue to develop the proposition for the Great British Railways app and website. We are engaging with industry on this project and will provide updates in due course.
Great British Railways’ (GBR’s) licence will require it to comply with the code of practice, which will be owned and managed by the Office of Road and Rail (ORR).
To ensure that GBR abides by the rules set out in the code of practice, affected third parties will be able challenge any decisions or actions they consider to be noncompliant, by raising them directly with the ORR. The ORR will be required to investigate and, if it considers that GBR has not complied, it will be able to demand corrective action by issuing binding orders on GBR.
The Government intends to publish the Road Safety Strategy this year.
The Government is committed to a fair and open rail retail market, in which Great British Railways (GBR) will sell tickets alongside, and compete with, independent retailers. Moreover, the retail industry management functions currently performed by the Rail Delivery Group will move to GBR.
To ensure fairness when GBR takes on these functions, the Government has announced a range of safeguards, including an industry code of practice. The code of practice will incorporate clear requirements for how GBR interacts with all market participants and impose separation of decision-making where relevant. It will be owned and managed by the Office of Rail and Road, and GBR’s licence will require compliance with it.
The Secretary of State has not met with the rail trade unions to discuss changes to pay and conditions. These matters are for employers to discuss with their union representatives, regardless of whether publicly or privately owned.
The Department is not a party to the contractual arrangements between Network Rail and Southeastern and cannot therefore comment on publication.
A single leadership team is achieved through contractual arrangements between Network Rail, the train operating company and DfT Operator Limited. The legal arrangements are based on those used in previous alliancing arrangements between Network Rail and train operators. These organisations will still be held to account for their respective accountabilities (including Network Rail under its network licence). Governance mechanisms being put in place include clear job descriptions for the single leadership team detailing the extent of their decision-making abilities and an escalation process for any perceived conflicts.
The Government has received no such representations.
The Department keeps all of its policies under review, to ensure they are aligned to the Government’s priorities and delivering the best possible outcomes for the public.
It is standard practice for any new administration to review the policies of its predecessors.
Where appropriate, we publish details of our reviews on gov.uk. This includes information on the independent reviews, public consultations and taskforces that have been launched, completed and published between 5 July 2024 and 5 January 2025.
All operators are required to meet their contractual obligations as set out in their National Rail Contract, including contractual performance indicators. Failure to comply with those contractual obligations, once Force Majeure claims have been taken into account, leaves operators open to enforcement action.
The Department is currently assessing if XC Trains Limited exceeded the default threshold, for any of the relevant indicators in these periods, once Force Majeure claims have been taken into account.
The current Remedial Agreement with XC Trains Limited that was agreed in August 2024 runs until March 2025. There has been no amendment to the existing Remedial Agreement.
All operators are required to meet their contractual obligations as set out in their National Rail Contract. Failure to comply with those contractual obligations leaves operators open to enforcement action.
It is public knowledge that CrossCountry is both reinstating services on some routes and amending the times of some services from May 2025. The Department has not agreed any alterations to the CrossCountry May 2025 timetable.
The current Remedial Agreement with XC Trains Limited that was agreed in August 2024 runs until March 2025. The Department is considering what further actions might be appropriate, if any.
The Remedial Agreement letter has been published on the .gov website. Redactions have been made using the exemptions permitted under both section 40(2) (personal information) and 43(2) (commercially prejudicial information) of the Freedom of Information Act. A public interest test was conducted as part of the consideration process. The Remedial Agreement runs until March 2025.
The Secretary of State announced on 4 December that, under the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024, South Western Railway’s services will transfer into public ownership on 25 May 2025, followed by c2c’s on 20 July 2025 and Greater Anglia’s in autumn 2025.
The way funding has been allocated to local authorities represents a change from previous methodologies to a fairer and simpler system, moving away from a competitive process. This funding for local authorities to deliver their Bus Service Improvement Plans has been allocated based on local needs, considering three factors, equally weighted. These are:
Transport in London is devolved to the Mayor and TfL. Thanks to constructive dialogue between TfL and the unions the strikes planned by both RMT and ASLEF for early November have now been called off.