Mentions:
1: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) obvious that many of the safeguards that had to be written into this Bill, in the absence of such judicial - Speech Link
2: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) not even a solicitor, so I do not have a vested interest in that.This was a golden opportunity for review - Speech Link
3: Baroness Berger (Lab - Life peer) It was replaced by the new untrialled process, involving non-judicial panels overseen by a new, tsar-like - Speech Link
4: Baroness Berridge (Con - Life peer) legislating as I sat on the Joint Committee scrutinising the Mental Health Bill after an independent review - Speech Link
5: Baroness Falkner of Margravine (XB - Life peer) However, she promised that, once the Bill became an Act, the Government would review all the impacts - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) The Law Commission’s review made clear that compensation claim evidence is disproportionately requested - Speech Link
2: None Changing the law does not fix poor social work or poor judicial practice. - Speech Link
3: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Judicial performance is something that the judicial leadership ought to want to scrutinise and evaluate - Speech Link
4: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Review and Courts Act 202254 The Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 is amended as follows.55 (1) Section - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Appellants will retain the ability to seek a judicial review of a refusal of permission in the High Court - Speech Link
2: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) review of that decision to the High Court. - Speech Link
3: Yasmin Qureshi (Lab - Bolton South and Walkden) They also massively restricted the rights of judicial review. - Speech Link
4: Siân Berry (Green - Brighton Pavilion) review, which seems to be the only remedy that the Minister has put forward to us today. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) is not properly considered, decisions may be unlawful and therefore open to challenge through a judicial - Speech Link
2: Lord Shipley (LD - Life peer) There is to be an annual review. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) review process, including adding good practice. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Con - Life peer) A judicial review is under way, involving around 500 Welsh farmers and landowners, many of whom face - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Rachel Reeves (Lab - Leeds West and Pudsey) Of course, we are keeping all scenarios under review, but it is quite clear that the best way to bring - Speech Link
2: Torcuil Crichton (Lab - Na h-Eileanan an Iar) Will the Chancellor encourage other Ministers to match her commitment by hastening the review of Jackdaw - Speech Link
3: Rachel Reeves (Lab - Leeds West and Pudsey) It is also why, in the not-too-distant future, the Energy Secretary, in a quasi-judicial way, will make - Speech Link
4: Rachel Reeves (Lab - Leeds West and Pudsey) As I have said on numerous occasions, we are keeping fuel duty under review. - Speech Link
5: Rachel Reeves (Lab - Leeds West and Pudsey) As I have said, we will keep additional support under review. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab - Life peer) Institute for Government that this means that decisions not to grant support could be subject to judicial - Speech Link
2: None We are trying to provide a specific statutory route to revocation via the EU law Act, pending a review - Speech Link
3: None We will look at the impact of the 42-day move-on period that we have settled on and keep it under review - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Hayward (Con - Life peer) is a suspicion in many people’s minds, probably quite reasonably, that it was the imminence of a judicial - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None With this it will be convenient to discuss new clause 29—Review of impact of provisions of section 3— - Speech Link
2: Paulette Hamilton (Lab - Birmingham Erdington) The timeline set out in the new clause—a review after 12 months and a further review no later than after - Speech Link
3: None That is a striking omission and is enough to justify a review clause. - Speech Link
4: None That takes us back to the Lammy review. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Kieran Mullan (Con - Bexhill and Battle) I hope the Minister will go on to clarify whether it is actually subject to judicial review. - Speech Link
2: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Those familiar with the judicial review process know that that is a high bar. - Speech Link
3: Paul Kohler (LD - Wimbledon) Judicial review is not an appeal of a decision; it is a review of a process. - Speech Link
4: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) If, at a PTPH, a judge makes an error of law, that is amenable to judicial review. Full stop. - Speech Link