Mentions:
1: Chris Bryant (Lab - Rhondda and Ogmore) At the moment we are engaged in a review of responsible business conduct, and I very much hope that that - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Steve Reed (LAB - Streatham and Croydon North) circumstances was lawful and justified.As is normal practice, lawyers kept the legal position under review - Speech Link
2: Ben Maguire (LD - North Cornwall) , this Government formally committed to delaying local elections again, but facing defeat in the judicial - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab - Life peer) Abolishing a lot of the place names, as the last local government review did in 1974, risks depriving - Speech Link
2: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) At that point, the local authority will be required to undertake and publish a review of whether it should - Speech Link
3: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) To legislate on public notices now, before we have the findings of that review, would surely be premature - Speech Link
4: Lord Fuller (Con - Life peer) Then there are quasi-judicial meetings, such as those on planning or licensing; in-person attendance - Speech Link
5: None It is key to think about how things such as the Dasgupta review were able to point to the economics of - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) Indeed, it is a fundamental element of our judicial process. - Speech Link
2: None Why not conduct the review first? - Speech Link
3: Baroness Brinton (LD - Life peer) under the victims’ right to review scheme. - Speech Link
4: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) review proceedings”. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None “With permission, Mr Speaker, I shall make a Statement on Jonathan Hall KC’s independent review of separation - Speech Link
2: None Before responding to Jonathan Hall’s review, I visited HMP Frankland’s separation centre. - Speech Link
3: None staff need to manage terrorist risk safely and confidently, including a comprehensive, expert-led review - Speech Link
4: None why we will explore all available options to overhaul the system, including, at the next spending review - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) Should there be a case to review the feedstock eligibility criteria, it would be subject to consultation - Speech Link
2: None It also means the Government will have to keep under review the benefits of this policy and the extent - Speech Link
3: Lord Grayling (Con - Life peer) And, of course, for government, it opens the doors to judicial review. - Speech Link
4: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) Additionally, a formal review has been incorporated into the SAF mandate legislation, with the initial - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (XB - Life peer) I think such guidance always needs to be kept under review. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) We look forward to the results of this review, expected in 2027. - Speech Link
3: Lord Garnier (Con - Life peer) As has been pointed out, my amendment asks for a review. - Speech Link
4: Baroness Brinton (LD - Life peer) Judicial summings-up are important. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Chris Bryant (Lab - Rhondda and Ogmore) In a whole series of sectors, we need to keep our review alert to that. - Speech Link
2: Chris Bryant (Lab - Rhondda and Ogmore) easily point out that these are not legally enforceable, but they are an opportunity—both at the first review - Speech Link
3: Douglas McAllister (Lab - West Dunbartonshire) It is often remarked that we must respect the Indian judicial system. - Speech Link
4: Chris Bryant (Lab - Rhondda and Ogmore) In fact, the first review of the deal will happen on the date it comes into force—as I said earlier, - Speech Link
5: Chris Bryant (Lab - Rhondda and Ogmore) The whole agreement is legally binding, and review processes are built into it in a way that makes it - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (XB - Life peer) It seems to me that the exercise of this judicial power must be for the judicial branch of the state - Speech Link
2: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) Whether to order attendance must remain a judicial assessment of what is in the interests of justice. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) The reason is that current operational policy, informed by the Taylor review of 2020, restricts the use - Speech Link
4: Lord Keen of Elie (Con - Life peer) They do not remove judicial discretion. - Speech Link
5: Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (XB - Life peer) Sadly, the judicial standards that we expect here are not applicable everywhere around the world. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None we have to the new threats to our national security, as set out clearly in the strategic defence review - Speech Link
2: Lord Wallace of Saltaire (LD - Life peer) Have the implications of the strategic defence review been taken into account in all this? - Speech Link
3: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Con - Life peer) Surely the sensible route is the one that we suggested in Amendment 75: to have a full review, consider - Speech Link
4: None However, this is kept under review each year. - Speech Link
5: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) review for failure to meet an existing duty. - Speech Link