Jason McCartney Portrait

Jason McCartney

Conservative - Former Member for Colne Valley

First elected: 12th December 2019

Left House: 30th May 2024 (Dissolution)


Culture, Media and Sport Committee
8th Jul 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Transport Committee
10th Jun 2013 - 30th Mar 2015


Division Voting information

Jason McCartney has voted in 2144 divisions, and 116 times against the majority of their Party.

22 Mar 2021 - Fire Safety Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 33 Conservative No votes vs 320 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 253
9 Feb 2021 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Conservative No votes vs 341 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 351 Noes - 276
26 Jan 2021 - Environment Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 352 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 360
26 Jan 2021 - Environment Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 354 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 354
19 Jan 2021 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Conservative No votes vs 344 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 353 Noes - 277
19 Jan 2021 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 353 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 353 Noes - 270
4 Nov 2020 - Agriculture Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative No votes vs 330 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 331 Noes - 272
4 Nov 2020 - Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 330 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 264
21 Oct 2020 - Free School Meals - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 320 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 322
19 Oct 2020 - Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative No votes vs 324 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 264
12 Oct 2020 - Agriculture Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 14 Conservative No votes vs 327 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 279
20 Jul 2020 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Conservative Aye votes vs 323 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 326
30 Jun 2020 - Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 331 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 332
17 Jun 2020 - Health and Personal Social Services - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 124 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 136
2 Jun 2020 - Proceedings during the Pandemic - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 31 Conservative Aye votes vs 240 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 242
13 May 2020 - Remote Division result: New Clause 2 - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Conservative Aye votes vs 326 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 328
13 Mar 2017 - Reproductive Health (Access to Terminations) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 17 Conservative Aye votes vs 123 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 142
2 Nov 2016 - Community Pharmacies - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 298 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 305
14 Sep 2016 - NHS Sustainability and Transformation Plans - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 280 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 280
5 Sep 2016 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 291 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 291
28 Jun 2016 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 288 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 295
13 Jun 2016 - Policing and Crime Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 262 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 268
13 Apr 2016 - Schools White Paper - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 299 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 204
2 Mar 2016 - Welfare Reform and Work Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 308 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 274
2 Mar 2016 - Welfare Reform and Work Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 308 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 275
24 Feb 2016 - Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 288 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 289
23 Feb 2016 - Welfare Reform and Work Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 305 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 279
23 Feb 2016 - Welfare Reform and Work Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 303 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 280
10 Feb 2016 - Local Government Finance (England) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 312 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 209
19 Jan 2016 - Student Maintenance Grants - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 302 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 303
16 Dec 2015 - Petroleum - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 296 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 261
8 Dec 2015 - European Union Referendum Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 296 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 253
8 Dec 2015 - Serious and Organised Crime: Prüm Convention - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Conservative Aye votes vs 264 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 503
7 Dec 2015 - Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 284 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 289
7 Sep 2015 - European Union Referendum Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 309 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 319
18 Jun 2015 - European Union Referendum Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 304 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 310
25 Mar 2015 - Infrastructure Planning - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative No votes vs 240 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 33
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 151 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 292
11 Feb 2015 - Infrastructure Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative No votes vs 231 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 203
26 Jan 2015 - Infrastructure Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative Aye votes vs 271 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 308
26 Jan 2015 - Infrastructure Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Conservative Aye votes vs 265 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 293
12 Jan 2015 - Consumer Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative No votes vs 244 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 203
24 Nov 2014 - Recall of MPs Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Conservative Aye votes vs 154 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 271
24 Nov 2014 - Recall of MPs Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 47 Conservative Aye votes vs 117 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 125
24 Nov 2014 - Recall of MPs Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 71 Conservative Aye votes vs 85 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 193
19 Nov 2014 - EU Justice and Home Affairs Measures - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Conservative No votes vs 162 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 421 Noes - 29
18 Nov 2014 - Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 18 Conservative Aye votes vs 235 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 269
10 Nov 2014 - Business of the House (Today) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 36 Conservative No votes vs 209 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 242
10 Nov 2014 - Criminal Law - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 36 Conservative No votes vs 223 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 464 Noes - 38
27 Oct 2014 - Recall of MPs Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 110 Conservative Aye votes vs 135 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 340
22 Oct 2014 - Independent parliamentary standards authority - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative No votes vs 185 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 384 Noes - 18
14 Oct 2014 - Carers Bedroom Entitlement (Social Housing Sector) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 8 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 8
15 Jul 2014 - Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Conservative Aye votes vs 224 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 454
13 May 2014 - Prohibition of Unpaid Internships - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 16 Conservative Aye votes vs 18 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 19
13 May 2014 - Consumer Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Conservative Aye votes vs 237 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 281
25 Mar 2014 - Representation of the People (Scotland) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 14 Conservative Aye votes vs 29 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 226
11 Mar 2014 - Care Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 251 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 288
27 Jan 2014 - European Union (Approvals) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 31 Conservative Aye votes vs 202 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 37 Noes - 243
27 Jan 2014 - European Union (Approvals) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 31 Conservative Aye votes vs 199 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 240
27 Jan 2014 - European Union (Approvals) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 25 Conservative No votes vs 202 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 28
22 Jan 2014 - Commission Work Programme 2014 - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 14 Conservative No votes vs 221 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 20
13 Jan 2014 - European Union (Approvals) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Conservative No votes vs 207 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 30
29 Aug 2013 - Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 31 Conservative No votes vs 240 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 285
5 Jun 2013 - Badger Cull - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 260 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 299
4 Jun 2013 - Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Conservative Aye votes vs 259 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 290
21 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 124 Conservative Aye votes vs 134 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 161
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 121 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 340
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 125 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 339
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 126 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 321
16 Apr 2013 - Growth and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Conservative No votes vs 247 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 259
5 Feb 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 139 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 175
29 Jan 2013 - Equality (Marriage) (Amendment) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Conservative No votes vs 64 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 31
7 Nov 2012 - Regional Pay (NHS) - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 248 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 292
6 Nov 2012 - Banking Union and Economic and Monetary Union - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 21 Conservative Aye votes vs 221 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 33 Noes - 273
25 Oct 2012 - Badger Cull - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 15 Conservative Aye votes vs 24 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 28
10 Jul 2012 - House of Lords Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 192 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 462 Noes - 124
27 Jun 2012 - Coryton Oil Refinery - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Conservative No votes vs 238 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 197
27 Jun 2012 - Coryton Oil Refinery - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Conservative No votes vs 235 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 203
19 Apr 2012 - Finance (No. 4) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 256 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 298
18 Apr 2012 - Finance (No. 4) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative Aye votes vs 277 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 323
12 Mar 2012 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 40 Conservative Aye votes vs 141 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 186
24 Oct 2011 - National Referendum on the European Union - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 209 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 483
11 Oct 2011 - Delegated legislation - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Conservative No votes vs 217 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 22
22 Jun 2011 - Smoking in Private Vehicles - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 13 Conservative Aye votes vs 53 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 66
24 May 2011 - Eurozone Financial Assistance - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Conservative No votes vs 220 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 46
17 May 2011 - Localism Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Conservative Aye votes vs 230 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 29 Noes - 279
9 Feb 2011 - Domestic Heating Oil - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Conservative No votes vs 234 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 45
25 Jan 2011 - European Union Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Conservative Aye votes vs 260 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 31 Noes - 324
11 Jan 2011 - European Union Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 25 Conservative Aye votes vs 255 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 39 Noes - 314
9 Dec 2010 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative No votes vs 295 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 302
9 Dec 2010 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Conservative No votes vs 295 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 302
10 Nov 2010 - European Union Economic Governance - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 23 Conservative No votes vs 243 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 40
25 Oct 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 22 Conservative Aye votes vs 245 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 293
14 Oct 2010 - Contaminated Blood and Blood Products - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative Aye votes vs 247 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 285
13 Oct 2010 - Draft EU Budget 2011 - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 35 Conservative Aye votes vs 204 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 42 Noes - 252
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 352 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 360 Noes - 221
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 351 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 222
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 350 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 270
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 352 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 270
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 351 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 351 Noes - 226
15 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 352 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 226
26 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 351 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 219
26 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 350 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 270
26 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Conservative No votes vs 352 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 270
26 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 351 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 351 Noes - 227
27 Apr 2021 - Fire Safety Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 31 Conservative No votes vs 320 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 256
28 Apr 2021 - Fire Safety Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 32 Conservative No votes vs 321 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 256
22 Nov 2021 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Conservative No votes vs 269 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 246
7 Mar 2022 - Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Conservative Aye votes vs 296 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 234 Noes - 300
22 Mar 2022 - Nationality and Borders Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 298 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 230
22 Mar 2022 - Nationality and Borders Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Conservative No votes vs 296 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 227
30 Mar 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 72 Conservative Aye votes vs 175 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 188
30 Mar 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Conservative No votes vs 245 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 150
20 Apr 2022 - Nationality and Borders Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Conservative No votes vs 301 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 235
25 Apr 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Conservative No votes vs 280 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 183
13 May 2024 - Risk-based Exclusion - View Vote Context
Jason McCartney voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 8 Conservative Aye votes vs 165 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 169
View All Jason McCartney Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
(60 debate interactions)
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
(48 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Cabinet Office
(112 debate contributions)
Department of Health and Social Care
(108 debate contributions)
Leader of the House
(95 debate contributions)
Department for Transport
(77 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
National Citizen Service Act 2017
(417 words contributed)
Access to Radiotherapy Bill 2016-17
(76 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Jason McCartney's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Jason McCartney

Jason McCartney has not signed any Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Jason McCartney, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Jason McCartney has not been granted any Urgent Questions

2 Adjournment Debates led by Jason McCartney

Monday 22nd June 2015
Tuesday 29th November 2011

Jason McCartney has not introduced any legislation before Parliament


Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
5 Other Department Questions
18th Mar 2015
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what plans he has to devolve further powers to rural areas.

Devolution to local areas is important to this Government and we have a proud record - the Localism Act, the creation of Local Enterprise Partnerships, the Local Government Finance Act, and the devolution of at least £12bn through Growth Deals which provide all areas the country to build on their economic potential.

The Chancellor also announced further devolution to the West Yorkshire Combined Authority, which will benefit both rural and urban areas in West Yorkshire including Colne Valley.

4th Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what comparative assessment he has made of trends in pump petrol prices and oil prices.

Movements in pump prices are primarily driven by crude oil prices; though are also influenced by a range of other factors; including tax, refining capacity, stock levels, distribution costs and retail margins.

The Government has been absolutely clear that it expects changes in crude prices to be passed on fairly to consumers. DECC continuously monitors pump prices, and publish average prices of petrol and diesel every Monday, available at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/oil-and-petroleum-products-weekly-statistics.

We have also cut then frozen fuel duty, leaving it 20p lower than previously planned.

DECC analysis has shown that crude price changes are reflected in pump prices and suggests that on average, at a national level, sustained crude price changes are fully passed through into pump prices within 6-7 weeks; though much of the change is passed through earlier. The analysis found no evidence to suggest there is a difference in pass-through times between crude price rises and falls.

25th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps he is taking to raise consumers' awareness of their rights following poor service from fact-checking websites for Government-provided services such as the EHIC card.

As the focal point of delivery of all government-funded consumer advice and information, the Citizens Advice Service is a one stop shop where consumers can find advice about their rights from a team of consumer advice experts but if they feel they have had poor service from a fact checking websites.

Citizens Advice and Citizens Advice Scotland can advise on consumers’ rights under the Consumer Protection from unfair Trading Regulations (CPRs). These regulations set out broad rules outlining when commercial practices are unfair. These fall into three main categories:

  • Misleading practices, like false or deceptive information or descriptions, or being misleading by leaving out important information.
  • Aggressive sales techniques that use harassment, coercion or undue influence.
  • Conduct below a level which may reasonable be expected towards consumers (honest market practice/good faith).

Consumers can contact Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 03454 04 05 06 or use the website: www.adviceguide.org.uk.

In addition, anyone wishing to report a copycat website can find information on GOV.UK - Avoid and report Internet Scams and Phishing, which provides information for common services affected including tax and passports.

As the member for Colne Valley was advised by my right honourable Friend the Minister for the Cabinet Office on 26th February, the Government is working with search engine providers and others such as the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and National Trading Standards Board (NTSB) to address the problems that can arise from misleading / copycat websites in relation to official government online services.

The Advertising Standards Associations (ASA) has responsibility for ensuring compliance with the British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing. Complaints about misleading advertisements can be made through ASA’s website at: www.asa.org.uk.

However, the best place to access official government services remains GOV.UK, the single website for government. Action is taken against websites that pass themselves off as Government sites, or claim to be acting on behalf of the Government when they are not. Last year four search warrants were executed on properties in England. The operation led to the arrest of five individuals and disrupted the operation of at least 25 copycat websites.

20th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the future of the Post Office card account after March 2015.

The Post Office card account is a matter for the Department for Work and Pensions. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills does not have a role in commercial negotiations between other Departments and Post Office Ltd.

Post Office Ltd and the Department for Work and Pensions are currently discussing the future of the Post Office card account and an announcement will be made when these discussions are concluded.

2nd Jul 2014
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what discussions he has had with the Leeds City Region Local Enterprise Partnership on devolving powers and responsibilities from central government.

I have been in regular dialogue with Leeds City Region LEP to discuss their Strategic Economic plan we have now concluded a Growth Deal with Leeds City Region.

This deal will include £571m from the Government's Local Growth Fund to support economic growth in the area – with £60m of new funding confirmed for 2015/16. This will lead to investment in local transport, housing sites and colleges.

20th Apr 2016
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the estimated cost is of introducing a National Defence medal; and what plans his Department has to reconsider the award of a National Defence medal.

An independent review undertaken by Sir John Holmes estimated the costs of producing a national defence medal to be £475million. This was based on an approximate figure of 7 million recipients who had completed four years of regular or Reserve Service, or completed national service (back to 9 September 1945), and 100% take up. There are no current plans to reconsider the award of the National Defence Medal.

20th Feb 2015
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps he is taking to stop websites charging for (a) the European Health Insurance Card and (b) other services provided for free by the Government.

The Government is working with search engine providers to address the problem of websites which are misleading to the public. The Government is also leading work with other bodies such as the National Trading Standards Board (NTSB) to raise public awareness of this issue and ensure enforcement action is taken where appropriate.

Gov.uk, the Government's single web domain, is the best place for the public to find information on Government services.

10th Oct 2014
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what representations have been made to his Department from local authorities on Clauses 8, 9 and 10 of the Deregulation Bill currently before Parliament.

The Cabinet Office has received representations on behalf of Trafford, Oldham and Kirklees councils in relation to provisions in the Deregulation Bill on taxis and private hire vehicles. The Department for Transport, which has policy responsibility for taxi and private hire vehicles, has also received representations on behalf of St Helens and South Ribble councils, and from the Local Government Association.

These representations raised issues relating to safety and to the Law Commission report on taxis and private hire vehicle licensing which the Government is currently considering.

The Government will withdraw clause 10, which would have allowed anyone with an ordinary driving licence to drive a private hire vehicle when it is ‘off-duty’, from the Bill when clauses 10-12 are debated at Lords Committee Stage on 21 October.

The remaining clauses in the Deregulation Bill are:

· clause 11 which will standardise the duration for all taxi and private hire vehicle driver licences at three years; and five years for all private hire vehicle operator licences. Shorter durations will only be granted on a case by case basis, where it is justifiable for a particular reason. This will reduce the financial and administrative burden of more frequent licence renewals; and

· clause 12 which will allow private hire operators to sub-contract bookings to operators licensed in a different district.

10th Oct 2014
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effect on the safety of passengers in taxis and private hire vehicles of implementation of the provision in Clause 8 of the Deregulation Bill currently before Parliament that unlicensed drivers will be able to drive a licensed vehicle when it is not being used for work purposes.

The Government’s view is that Clause 10 (previously Clause 8) of the Deregulation Bill is a common-sense measure with adequate safeguards. However, after listening to concerns about this proposal during the passage of the Bill, the Government has concluded that a better course of action would be for this measure to be considered as part of the package of measures recommended by the Law Commission to reform taxi and private hire vehicle licensing which the Government is considering.

The Government will withdraw clause 10 from the Bill when clauses 10-12 are debated at Lords Committee Stage on 21 October.

24th Jan 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether her Department plans to provide financial support to people seeking to decarbonise their heating systems but who experience challenges in (a) installing a heat pump and (b) connecting to a heat network.

The Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS) provides grants to property owners in England and Wales to replace existing fossil fuel heating with a low carbon heating system. Where a heat pump may not be suitable, the BUS provides grants of £5,000 for Biomass Boilers in off gas grid properties in rural locations.

The Government has committed £485m of capital spending for heat network development (across England only) through the Green Heat Network Fund. Government does not provide financial support for domestic customers to connect to heat networks.

The Government’s ‘Find ways to save energy in your home’ (www.gov.uk/improve-energy-efficiency) website also helps users get tailored recommendations for their home that could make their property cheaper to heat and keep warm. Consumers can also call the home retrofit phoneline service on 0800 098 7950.

9th Nov 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps her Department is taking to consult on the future of Channel 4.

The government has consulted on the best ownership model to support Channel 4 as part of our review of the public service broadcasting ecosystem.

The public consultation ran for 10 weeks before closing on 14 September. We received around 60,000 responses.

We are analysing every response to make sure we come to an informed decision on whether a change of ownership is the best way to secure Channel 4’s future.

Julia Lopez
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
24th May 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment he has made of adequacy of online gambling protections provided by gambling companies for (a) known frequent gamblers and (b) other online users.

Keeping gambling fair and open and free from crime, and protecting children and vulnerable people from being harmed or exploited are priorities for the government and key licensing objectives for the Gambling Commission. The Commission requires all operators to monitor gambling activity and to intervene where a customer may be at risk of harm. It has consulted on tightening its rules on customer interaction for online operators and will publish a response and next steps in the summer.

The government launched its Review of the Gambling Act 2005 on 8 December with the publication of a Call for Evidence. As part of the broad scope of the Review, we called for evidence on the effectiveness of our regulatory system, including protections for online gamblers and the Gambling Commission's powers and resources. We aim to publish a white paper by the end of the year.

24th May 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Gambling Commission in reducing gambling-related harms.

Keeping gambling fair and open and free from crime, and protecting children and vulnerable people from being harmed or exploited are priorities for the government and key licensing objectives for the Gambling Commission. The Commission requires all operators to monitor gambling activity and to intervene where a customer may be at risk of harm. It has consulted on tightening its rules on customer interaction for online operators and will publish a response and next steps in the summer.

The government launched its Review of the Gambling Act 2005 on 8 December with the publication of a Call for Evidence. As part of the broad scope of the Review, we called for evidence on the effectiveness of our regulatory system, including protections for online gamblers and the Gambling Commission's powers and resources. We aim to publish a white paper by the end of the year.

25th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to plans to restrict online advertising of products High in Fat, Sugar and Salt (HFSS), whether online platforms are planned to be held legally responsible under statutory rules for making sure that HFSS food and drink advertising does not appear.

The government will shortly publish its response to consultations held in 2019 and 2020 which set out proposals to ban HFSS advertisements being shown on TV before 9pm, and for further statutory measures to restrict HFSS advertising online.

The response will set out the Government’s approach to online liability and enforcement.

25th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what specific steps his Department will take to enforce restrictions on online advertising of products high in fat, sugar and salt.

In 2019 and 2020, the Government consulted on proposals to further restrict HFSS advertising on TV and online. We will be publishing the government response to the consultation shortly, which will set out the future policy direction for both TV and online HFSS advertising.

In the 2020 consultation we proposed that the day-to-day responsibility for applying HFSS advertising restrictions be given to the Advertising Standards Authority, recognising their expertise and experience in regulating advertising. Following the current regulatory regime, we propose that breaches would be resolved in line with current ASA policy of responding to individual complaints and promoting voluntary cooperation with the restriction.

If this approach failed or advertisers were committing repeated or severe breaches relating to HFSS marketing material, they would face stronger penalties through a statutory backstop. We would envisage that the backstop regulator would have powers to issue civil sanctions, including the ability to issue fines.

We want to ensure that the enforcement powers of the statutory regulator are designed and used in a way that incentivises compliance and allows for rapid remedial action. The Government will implement any new HFSS advertising restrictions across both online and TV simultaneously by the end of 2022, as outlined in the Tackling Obesity policy published on 27 July 2020.

20th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what oversight he has of the allocation of the Arts Council England's funding to other organisations.

Funding decisions are made by Arts Council England, without Government input. Ministers establish the strategic priorities for ACE’s spending in each Spending Round and regularly meet with Arts Council England.

19th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many companies were fined more than once for making nuisance calls by (a) the Information Commissioner's Office and (b) Ofcom in each of the last three years.

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and the Office of Communications (Ofcom) have issued monetary penalties totalling more than £1.9 million since January 2012 for nuisance calls, however no company has been issued with a monetary penalty more than once by either ICO or Ofcom for making nuisance calls.

19th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many companies were fined for making nuisance calls by (a) the Information Commissioner's Office and (b) Ofcom in each of the last three years.

The number of monetary penalties issued for making nuisance calls by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and the Office of Communications (Ofcom) in each of the last three years is set out in the table below. Also, both the ICO and Ofcom take informal enforcement action to ensure that companies about whom they have concerns are brought into compliance more quickly. From January 2013 - June 2014, ICO engaged with over 20 organisations, which were responsible for making nuisance calls and as a result recorded substantial reductions in complaints for five of these organisations. Ofcom's informal action against 25 organisations making silent and abandoned phone calls has resulted in complaints linked to the telephone numbers used by 22 of those organisations stopping or reducing significantly, while three cases are ongoing. The power to issue monetary penalties of £500,000 for ICO came into force in January 2012, whilst Ofcom's power to issue a monetary penalty of £2 million became effective in October 2010.

Year

2011

2012

2013

Total

ICO*

-

1

3

£360,000

Ofcom

-

2

1

£1,560,000

*ICO has also issued monetary penalties to two companies for SMS spam text messages in 2012 and 2013

19th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will bring forward legislative proposals to increase the penalties available for repeat offenders against the law relating to nuisance calls.

Further legislation is not necessary, as both the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and the Office of Communications (Ofcom) can issue substantive monetary penalties of up to £500,000 and £2 million respectively to any organisation that deliberately continues to contravene the regulations.

24th May 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to the Answer of 19 April 2021 to Question 175810 on Education: Finance, if he will confirm the cost of using a national funding rate of £4,760 to calculate 16-19 funding allocations for 2020-21.

Modelling the cost of increasing the base rate to £4,760 for 16-19 funding allocations for 2020-21 would require consideration of various factors, such as, the forecast of expected student numbers across age ranges, the characteristics of those students, the courses undertaken, the effect of lagged funding and the impact of the policy change required. The department does not routinely make estimates of this kind.

25th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will make an estimate of the cost of increasing the national funding rate for all full time 16, 17 and 18 year old students to £4,760 per year.

The information requested is not held centrally as the department does not routinely make estimates of this kind. Modelling such costs would require consideration of various factors, such as the forecast of expected student numbers across age ranges, the characteristics of those students, the courses undertaken, the effect of lagged funding and the impact of the policy change required.

24th Jun 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that local authorities provide sufficient short breaks to children with life-shortening conditions in England.

Since 2011, local authorities have been under a duty to provide a range of short breaks services and to publish a local Short Breaks Duty Statement showing what services are available, how they are responding to the needs of local parent carers, and how short breaks can be accessed, including any eligibility criteria. Local authorities are responsible for funding this short breaks provision.

Between April 2011 and March 2015, the government made available £800 million to local authorities for short break provision, along with an additional £80 million of capital funding for equipment and infrastructure.

Between April 2015 and March 2016, we awarded £250,555 to the Short Breaks Partnership (a consortium made up of Contact a Family, the Council for Disabled Children, Action for Children, and KIDS) to provide information and advice to those involved in designing, commissioning, providing, and taking up short breaks for disabled children. The Department for Education has allocated £200m funding over the next 4 years to support innovation and improvement to children’s social work practice. We are currently considering how we can use some of this funding to support local innovative approaches to short breaks for disabled children and their families and for making services more accessible.

The Department’s Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Advisory Team is continuing to offer support and challenge to local authorities to help make sure they meet all of their statutory requirements and that quality continues to improve. From this summer, there will be opportunities through the new Ofsted/Care Quality Commission SEND inspections framework for local areas to consider how well they are providing for the education, health and care needs of those with SEND, including their need for short breaks services. In addition, Together for Short lives, the UK charity for children and young people with life limiting conditions, received £551,029 from the Department for Education over a 3 year period – between April 2013 and March 2016, to help ensure children and young people with life limiting conditions benefited from the SEND reforms.

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent meetings she has had with civil society groups on potential adverse health effects of introducing more technology in schools.

The Secretary of State has not met with any civil society groups to discuss the potential adverse health effects of introducing more technology in schools.

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what research her Department has undertaken on the potential effect of digital screen use on students in the last five years.

There has been no specific research undertaken by the department on the potential effect of digital screen use on students in the last five years.

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many legal cases are being brought against schools in the UK related to injuries caused by digital screen use.

The Department for Education is not aware of any legal cases that have been brought, or are in the process of being brought, against schools in the UK in relation to injuries caused by digital screen use.

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will introduce lessons on managing the risk of injuries related to digital screen use to school curriculums.

The national curriculum sets out the essential skills and knowledge that children must be taught at school. Schools have the freedom to teach subjects or topics beyond the national curriculum to ensure that their pupils receive a rounded education.

Using technology safely is covered at each key stage in the computing curriculum, which is compulsory for all pupils aged 5-16 in maintained schools.

The programmes of study for the national curriculum in computing are published online at:

www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how much her Department has spent on (a) tablet computers and (b) other new information technology for students in schools in (i) 2012-13 and (ii) 2013-14.

The Department for Education does not provide schools with dedicated funds for information technology. We are therefore unable to advise on the volume or type of equipment that has been purchased. Headteachers manage their own budgets, prioritise spend and are best placed to decide on local requirements.

14th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what her policy is on the refund of VAT costs to sixth form colleges.

All funding decisions, including the question of the VAT costs currently paid by sixth form colleges, will be considered in the round at the Spending Review.

1st Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what representative bodies for home education took part in the recent discussions with her Department.

Meetings have been held by Departmental officials with: the policy committee of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services; officers of Darlington Borough Council; the children’s services scrutiny committee of the City of Westminster; and two regional forums of local authority elective home education officers, one for London and the South East and the other for the West Midlands.

1st Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent representations on issues other than safeguarding her Department she has received from bodies representing home schooling.

The Department for Education has had no representations recently from bodies representing home schooling.

6th Nov 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what plans she has to respond to recommendation 2015/105 from the Marine Accident Investigation Branch in its 2/2015 Investigation Report, on adoption of the Boat Safety Scheme by the Lake District National Park Authority.

The National Park and the Broads Authorities are independent bodies operating within the local government framework and therefore it is for the Lake District National Park Authority to decide whether to adopt the recommendation to implement the Boat Safety Scheme. I understand the National Park Authority will shortly be seeking its members’ views on the recommendation.

4th Mar 2020
What steps her Department is taking to protect the world’s (a) forestry and (b) biodiversity.

DFID is at the forefront of global efforts to tackle illegal logging and promote sustainable trade in timber, and eliminate deforestation from supply chains. These programmes, and other assistance from the UK, are helping to preserve the world’s most valuable habitats and address biodiversity loss.

1st Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what aid the Government provided to Indian-administered Kashmir after the floods of September 2014.

No request for assistance was made by the Indian Government. A decision to not provide support was taken following a comprehensive assessment. The immediate humanitarian crisis is now over and compensation for those impacted by the floods has been announced by the Government.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps she is taking to tackle female genital mutilation and early and forced marriage worldwide.

FGM is violence against women and girls. The UK has made the largest donor commitment ever to help end FGM, with a flagship programme of £35 million in at least 17 countries.

The Prime Minister will host a summit in July which will step up global efforts to end both FGM and child, early and forced marriage within a generation.

15th May 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information his Department holds on the number of (a) fatal and (b) other serious head injuries that were received by people whilst inside road vehicles in the latest period for which data is available.

The Department collects information on personal injury road collisions reported to police via the STATS19 data collection system.

Fatal casualties do not have an injury recorded for them. Only slight and serious casualties reported on an injury-based reporting system have detail on the type of injuries sustained in the collision. In 2022, 27 out of 44 police forces were using an injury-based reporting system.

The number of serious casualties where the most severe recorded injury was a head injury, by road user type in Great Britain for 2022, for which is the latest available year, can be found in the table below.

Reported road casualties reported using an injury-based reporting system by injury type and road user type, Great Britain (police forces using an injury-based reporting system), 2022

Road user type

Serious head injury

Car Occupant

1,937

Bus Occupant

99

Van Occupant

111

HGV Occupant

14

25th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent progress has been made on updates to the Transpennine rail route.

£589m funding announced in July 2020 has enabled further design and development work on the Transpennine Route Upgrade programme. The first stages of Overhead Line Electrification (OLE) installation have begun between York and Church Fenton, and in the Spring Network Rail will be carrying out engineering work between Manchester Victoria and Stalybridge to support future masts and electric wires.

25th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent progress has been made on the eastern leg of HS2 that connects the line to Yorkshire.

The government is committed to ensuring Yorkshire reaps the benefits on high-speed services. The Integrated Rail Plan will consider the sequencing and delivery of HS2, as well as Northern Powerhouse Rail and other rail investment projects to ensure the benefits of these investments are delivered to passengers and communities more quickly. We intend to publish the IRP this Spring.

2nd Jul 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many electric buses are operating in (a) Colne Valley constituency, (b) Kirklees and (c) West Yorkshire.

We do not hold information on how many buses are operating in a particular area, but we can provide the number of buses & coaches registered in West Yorkshire according to the location of the recorded keeper of each vehicle.

The following table relates to where these vehicles are registered by their keeper, which does not mean they are operated in these areas, nor does it stop other buses & coaches registered elsewhere from operating in these areas.

Table: Registered battery electric buses & coaches at the end of March 2020

Area

Licensed for use on the road

Statutory Off Road Notification (SORN)

Colne Valley constituency

0

1

Kirklees

1

1

West Yorkshire

24

4

2nd Jul 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information his Department holds on the roll-out of electric buses in (a) Colne Valley (b) Kirklees and (c) West Yorkshire.

Through the Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme (ULEBS), West Yorkshire Combined Authority (which includes both Colne Valley and Kirklees) and First West Yorkshire received £617,000.00 for 5 electric buses and charging infrastructure and £1,770,472.50 for 9 electric buses and charging infrastructure respectively, totalling £2,387,472.50.

17th Jun 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when the Transpennine Rail upgrade project will commence.

Upgrades have already been delivered at Micklefield, we are upgrading the Calder Valley route to provide an essential alternative route during the works, and Network Rail is currently consulting on upgrades between Huddersfield and Ravensthorpe to ensure our focus is on better journeys for passengers.

17th Jun 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the benefits of the Transpennine Rail Upgrade to passengers and commuters.

The Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU) is a vital step towards transforming rail connectivity across the north, delivering more seats, faster journeys, a more reliable service for commuters and visible improvements to several stations along the route.

17th Jun 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what route the upgraded Transpennine Rail will take.

TRU will bring significant improvements to the existing East-West rail link across the North, from York to Manchester via Leeds and Huddersfield.

17th Jun 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate he has made of budget required for the Transpennine rail upgrade.

The Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU) is a multi-billion pound programme and the Government's biggest single investment in upgrading the country's railway in the next five years. TRU has developed an Outline Business Case that has been going through approval processes this month. Further announcements on the budget will be made as soon as that process completes.

3rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether any changes are planned to the notification system for those pets killed on the strategic road network after the micro-chipping law comes into force in 2016.

The Highways Agency is aware that the Animal Welfare Act will be amended to reflect the change to compulsory microchipping of dogs by April 2016.

In advance of this change, the Highways Agency is currently assessing the potential merits of amending contracts to understand the implications of including mandatory identification and recording of domestic animals found on the strategic road network, including contacting pet owners where possible and advising relevant registration organisations.

2nd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what procedure exists for notifying owners of pets that are killed on the strategic road network.

The Highways Agency Network Management Manual (2009) sets out procedures for notifying owners of canines that are killed on the strategic road network for a number of Highways Agency area maintenance contracts. These contracts are due to be phased out which will result in a different approach in dealing with canine fatalities across the strategic road network as the replacement contracts no longer mandate that canine fatalities are scanned, identified or the owners contacted.

Consequently, the Highways Agency is currently assessing the potential merits of amending contracts to understand the implications of including mandatory identification and recording of domestic animals found on the strategic road network, including contacting pet owners where possible and advising relevant registration organisations.

30th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of amending contracts with Highways Agency's contractors to include (a) the compulsory scanning of all domestic animals for micro-chip identification, (b) recording pet identifications and (c) contacting the owners of the pet upon the death of a domestic animal on the road network.

The Highways Agency is currently assessing the potential merits of amending contracts to understand the implications of including mandatory identification and recording of domestic animals found on the strategic road network, including contacting pet owners where possible and advising relevant registration organisations.

20th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues on the future of the Post Office card account.

Discussions continue between Her Majesty’s Government and Post Office LTD regarding the future of the Post Office card account and the needs of our customers beyond March 2015, announcements will be made when these discussions reach a conclusion.