Mark Ferguson Portrait

Mark Ferguson

Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham

9,644 (24.0%) majority - 2024 General Election

First elected: 4th July 2024



Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Mark Ferguson has voted in 44 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Mark Ferguson Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury
(4 debate interactions)
Bridget Phillipson (Labour)
Minister for Women and Equalities
(4 debate interactions)
Ellie Reeves (Labour)
Minister without Portfolio (Cabinet Office)
(3 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Cabinet Office
(6 debate contributions)
Home Office
(4 debate contributions)
Wales Office
(3 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Mark Ferguson's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Mark Ferguson

Mark Ferguson has not signed any Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Mark Ferguson, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Mark Ferguson has not been granted any Urgent Questions

Mark Ferguson has not been granted any Adjournment Debates

Mark Ferguson has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Mark Ferguson has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 14 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
8th Nov 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many kinship carers are registered in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency; and if she will make an estimate of the average number of kinship carers registered per constituency.

The information is not available as requested. The department does not collect information on the number of kinship carers or the average number of registrations per constituency. We do collect information on the numbers of foster care placements with family or friends. The latest figures at national level were published in a statistical release 'Children looked after in England including adoptions: 2022-23', which is available here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/data-tables/permalink/168a811f-bbe6-4988-a17b-08dcfae39e23. However, information on children looked after is collected at local authority level and is not held centrally for parliamentary constituency areas.

In recent years, there have been two statistical reports on the number of kinship carers that have been produced by other government departments. In both cases, the data was only published at local authority level.

On 7 November 2024, Ofsted published official statistics on 'Fostering in England 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024', which is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fostering-in-england-1-april-2023-to-31-march-2024/fostering-in-england-1-april-2023-to-31-march-2024#family. This set of statistics presented figures on the number of family and friends households and carers, sometimes known as kinship care. The underlying data table provided by Ofsted can be accessed at: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fmedia%2F6729e321541e1dfbf71e8b5c%2FFostering_in_England_underlying_data_2024_final.ods&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.

The table indicates that there were 55 approved family and friends households in Gateshead local authority in 2023/24 compared to 45 in 2019/20.

In September 2023, the Office for National Statistics published separate data on the proportion of households with kinship care by local authority area in the data release 'Kinship care in England and Wales: Census 2021', which can be found here: https://www.ons.gov.uk/releases/kinshipcareinenglandandwalescensus2021. These figures were derived using older data from the 2021 national census and showed detailed characteristics of children living in households without their parents but with other relatives in the year 2021. The report also presented the geographical distribution of kinship care households (Section 6). The proportion of households with kinship care arrangements (as a proportion of households of five people or fewer containing anyone aged 17 years and under) in Gateshead local authority was reported as 2.2%.

Janet Daby
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
8th Nov 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many primary school children are (a) eligible for and (b) registered to receive free school meals in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency.

The most recently published figures on free school meals (FSM) eligibility are from the January 2024 school census, published in June 2024 here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-pupils-and-their-characteristics.

The statistics are based on counts of pupils who are eligible for FSM and are known by their school to be claiming. The department does not hold information on pupils who are eligible but do not claim.

Where statistics were published prior to the changes in parliamentary constituency boundaries, they will be updated to reflect the new boundaries in the next publication of statistics. This is expected to be in June 2025 for schools’ and pupils’ statistics.

The constituency of Gateshead Central and Whickham is made up of elements of two old constituencies: Gateshead and Blaydon. As of January 2024, 35% of pupils at state-funded primary schools in Gateshead and 21% of pupils at state-funded primary schools in Blaydon were eligible for and claiming FSM. This compares with 24% for the whole of England.

The schools and pupils publication includes data at school level. This can be combined with information from ‘Get Information About Schools’ (GIAS) to identify parliamentary constituency, which can be accessed here: https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/. GIAS reflects the changes made following the general election parliamentary constituency changes. Updates to geographical data in GIAS are made on a quarterly basis using data published by the Office for National Statistics.

Stephen Morgan
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
30th Aug 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the average funding per pupil was in mainstream schools in (a) Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency, (b) the North East Combined Authority Area and (c) England in each of the last five years.

The table below sets out funding statistics for the North East and England in each of the last five years.

The figures represent the funding provided through the schools block of the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). All of the figures in the table exclude growth funding but include premises. The figures do not include the additional grant funding that schools across the country have received to support pay and pensions increases in 2024/25.

The DSG is allocated at local authority level and, as such, the equivalent figures are not available for Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency. The allocations that schools within a constituency receive are determined by the local funding formula in their area.

The table below provides average per-pupil funding for the last five years, from the 2020/21 to 2024/25 financial years:

Year

DSG Schools Block per-pupil funding

North East *

England

​2020/21

£4,828

£5,055

​2021/22

£5,220

£5,212

​2022/23

£5,538

£5,534

​2023/24

£5,869

£5,838

2024/25

£5,993

£5,957

* The data the department holds for the North East is for the North East region, as opposed to the North East Combined Authority Area.

Catherine McKinnell
Minister of State (Education)
30th Aug 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many apprenticeships started in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency in each of the last five years.

Apprenticeship starts are published at parliamentary constituency level in the Apprenticeships official statistics, which is available here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/data-tables/apprenticeships. Data for Gateshead Central and Whickham by academic year from 2018/19 to 2022/23 can be found in the dataset called ‘Geography - New Parliamentary Constituency Breakdowns’.

Janet Daby
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
8th Nov 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the average life expectancy is in (a) Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency and (b) each ward of that constituency.

Life expectancy estimates for Parliamentary constituencies are not available. Life expectancy estimates for local authorities in England are produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The latest available figures from the ONS are for the three-year period 2020 to 2022. In that period, life expectancy at birth for the Gateshead local authority, which includes the constituency of Gateshead and Whickham, was 76.7 years for males, and 81.4 years for females.

Life expectancy estimates for electoral wards are produced by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID). The following table shows the latest available estimates of life expectancy at birth, separated by sex, for the five-year period of 2016 to 2020, in the electoral wards within the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency:

Electoral ward name

Sex

Life expectancy in years

Bridges

Male

73.7

Chowdene

Male

77.8

Deckham

Male

74.1

Dunston and Teams

Male

73.0

Dunston Hill and Whickham East

Male

79.0

High Fell

Male

74.5

Lobley Hill and Bensham

Male

74.7

Low Fell

Male

80.8

Saltwell

Male

76.5

Whickham North

Male

77.9

Whickham South and Sunniside

Male

82.3

Bridges

Female

78.6

Chowdene

Female

83.1

Deckham

Female

77.8

Dunston and Teams

Female

81.1

Dunston Hill and Whickham East

Female

83.8

High Fell

Female

78.6

Lobley Hill and Bensham

Female

78.6

Low Fell

Female

83.8

Saltwell

Female

84.8

Whickham North

Female

80.3

Whickham South and Sunniside

Female

87.6

Source: data is from the OHID’s Local Health profile, with further information on male and female life expectancy within the Gateshead local authority available, respectively, at the following two links:

https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/local-health/data#page/3/gid/1938133185/pat/502/par/E08000037/ati/8/are/E05001067/iid/93283/age/1/sex/1/cat/-1/ctp/-1/yrr/5/cid/4/tbm/1

https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/local-health/data#page/3/gid/1938133185/pat/502/par/E08000037/ati/8/are/E05001067/iid/93283/age/1/sex/2/cat/-1/ctp/-1/yrr/5/cid/4/tbm/1/page-options/car-do-0

The profile also provides comparable estimates for the Gateshead local authority for the five-year period, from 2016 to 2020.

Andrew Gwynne
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
17th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how much has been (a) budgeted and (b) spent by the Care Quality Commission on the (i) design, (ii) development and (iii) rollout of its new regulatory platform.

The Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) budget for its new regulatory platform was £88.3 million. The actual cost of the regulatory platform is £92.4 million, including the utilisation of contingency, which isn’t accounted for in the budget, and so is the reason for the variance. The actual cost comprises spending on contingent labour, internal staffing, professional services, and non-pay costs. All spending during the CQC’s transformation was subject to appropriate governance, and any procurement was undertaken in line with public sector standards.

The regulatory platform was gradually delivered and implemented over a five-year period to the end of March 2024. The CQC is unable to provide a breakdown of the figures into design, development, and rollout as the regulatory platform was broken down into various services and each of these had a different design, build, test, and deploy phase. These phases overlapped due to the phased rollout.

Andrew Gwynne
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
30th Aug 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate his Department has made of the number of open GP practices in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency (a) on the most recent date for which figures are available and (b) in 2010.

The data provided has been sourced from NHS Digital and shows the number of open practices as of August 2024, and in August 2014 as no data is available prior to this. The data only includes main practices in the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency and does not include branch practices. Locations have been mapped to current constituency boundaries. Open and close dates for practices were identified using data from NHS Organisation Data Service.

As of August 2024, there are 15 open practices in the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency. In August 2014, there were 19 open practices in the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency.

Stephen Kinnock
Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
30th Aug 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many referrals have been accepted by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in Gateshead in each of the last five years.

The following table shows the number of referrals for those children aged between 0 and 17 years old at the time of referral to mental health services in Gateshead local authority between 2019/20 and 2023/24:

Reporting Period

Number of new referrals

Number of new referrals that received a first contact (contact can occur at any point within the referral)

2019/20

2,415

1,745

2020/21

2,420

1,755

2021/22

4,130

2,695

2022/23

4,150

2,260

2023/24

6,940

2,225

Source: Mental Health Dataset, NHS England

Notes:

  1. The definition of by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the dataset is not clear cut and also the methodology for deriving CAMHS changes over time. As such, the use of age at referral is the most reliable way of defining those referred to CAMHS.
  2. The number provided includes all new referrals in each year where the person was a resident of the local authority of Gateshead. In addition, the number of referrals which have had a contact is included to provide context around the numbers of referrals which have been received and subsequently had a care contact.
  3. For some referrals it may not be expected that a contact would be recorded. For example, in some circumstances, referrals are received by triage teams. These referrals are subsequently closed without a contact with a new referral opened once triaged.
  4. In some scenarios, referral IDs are being re-used. For the purposes of this analysis, the care contact must take place within the same referral for the same person, as such a small number of contacts may not be included within a specific referral but this is a data quality issue.
Stephen Kinnock
Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
30th Aug 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many people have been waiting to access Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services support in Gateshead for more than six months.

The following table shows the number of referrals that subsequently received a first contact over six months from the referral request date from 2019/20 to 2023/24, and the number of referrals still waiting for a contact having waited at least six months, regardless of when the referral started, as of the end of March 2024, for those aged zero to 17 years old:

Reporting Period

Referrals who received first contact over six months from the referral request date

Referrals still waiting for a contact having waited at least six months

2019/20

85

2020/21

150

2021/22

570

2022/23

145

2023/24

60

1,745

Source: Mental Health Dataset.

As the definition of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in the dataset is not clear cut, and the methodology for deriving CAMHS changes over time, the use of age at referral is the most reliable way of defining those referred to CAMHS.

The number provided includes all new referrals in each year where the person was a resident of the local authority of Gateshead. In addition, the number of referrals which have had a contact is included to provide context around the numbers of referrals which have been received and subsequently had a care contact.

For some referrals it may not be expected that a contact would be recorded. For example, in some circumstances, referrals are received by triage teams. These referrals are subsequently closed without a contact, with a new referral opened once triaged.

In some scenarios, referral IDs are being re-used. For the purposes of this analysis, the care contact must take place within the same referral for the same person, as such a small number of contacts may not be included within a specific referral, but this is a data quality issue.

Stephen Kinnock
Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
23rd Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether he has had recent discussions with his (a) French and (b) Mozambique counterpart on the alleged massacre of civilians by Mozambican military personnel at the TotalEnergies plant in 2021.

Our High Commissioner in Mozambique has raised the alleged massacre of civilians at the TotalEnergies plant in 2021 with representatives of the Government of Mozambique and local counterparts, alongside France and the US. The UK is offering continued support to Mozambique on responding to the ongoing IS-Mozambique insurgency in Cabo Delgado. This support includes programmes aimed at building local resilience to violent extremism, and security and human rights training of Mozambican Armed Forces.

Anneliese Dodds
Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
12th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether it is her policy that developers are responsible for financing (a) aluminium composite material assessments and (b) subsequent fire safety remedial modifications other than cladding.

The department collects data on the number of residential buildings over 18 metres in height in England with unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding. In the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency, fewer than 10 such buildings have been identified, but the exact number cannot be disclosed to protect the privacy of individual buildings.

Leaseholders in buildings over 11 metres or five storeys are protected from paying for remediation of safety defects if the developer has signed the developer remediation contract. Additionally, the Government has made £5.1 billion available through the Building Safety Fund and Cladding Safety Scheme to cover cladding repairs for buildings over 18 metres where no responsible developer can be identified.

Furthermore, Remediation Contribution Orders provide leaseholders with a means to recover historical safety remediation costs from those responsible, such as developers.

The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE), funded by the department, offers free legal advice to leaseholders.

Developers who have signed the remediation contract are responsible for funding assessments and completing all fire safety work, including non-cladding issues, in line with PAS9980 standards for external works and relevant standards for internal works, all at their own expense.

Rushanara Ali
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
12th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure that leaseholders do not have to fund remedial building modifications associated with aluminium composite material cladding.

The department collects data on the number of residential buildings over 18 metres in height in England with unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding. In the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency, fewer than 10 such buildings have been identified, but the exact number cannot be disclosed to protect the privacy of individual buildings.

Leaseholders in buildings over 11 metres or five storeys are protected from paying for remediation of safety defects if the developer has signed the developer remediation contract. Additionally, the Government has made £5.1 billion available through the Building Safety Fund and Cladding Safety Scheme to cover cladding repairs for buildings over 18 metres where no responsible developer can be identified.

Furthermore, Remediation Contribution Orders provide leaseholders with a means to recover historical safety remediation costs from those responsible, such as developers.

The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE), funded by the department, offers free legal advice to leaseholders.

Developers who have signed the remediation contract are responsible for funding assessments and completing all fire safety work, including non-cladding issues, in line with PAS9980 standards for external works and relevant standards for internal works, all at their own expense.

Rushanara Ali
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
12th Sep 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what data her Department holds on the number of buildings over (a) 11 and (b) 18 metres in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency that have aluminium composite material cladding.

The department collects data on the number of residential buildings over 18 metres in height in England with unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding. In the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency, fewer than 10 such buildings have been identified, but the exact number cannot be disclosed to protect the privacy of individual buildings.

Leaseholders in buildings over 11 metres or five storeys are protected from paying for remediation of safety defects if the developer has signed the developer remediation contract. Additionally, the Government has made £5.1 billion available through the Building Safety Fund and Cladding Safety Scheme to cover cladding repairs for buildings over 18 metres where no responsible developer can be identified.

Furthermore, Remediation Contribution Orders provide leaseholders with a means to recover historical safety remediation costs from those responsible, such as developers.

The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE), funded by the department, offers free legal advice to leaseholders.

Developers who have signed the remediation contract are responsible for funding assessments and completing all fire safety work, including non-cladding issues, in line with PAS9980 standards for external works and relevant standards for internal works, all at their own expense.

Rushanara Ali
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
10th Oct 2024
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department takes to determine the level of funding required to facilitate an adequate number of crown court sitting days in each financial year.

Every year, the Government and the Judiciary agree a number of sitting days and an overall budget in what is known as the Concordat process.

In June, the Judiciary reached an agreement with the former Lord Chancellor to sit 106,000 days in the Crown Court within a total budget of £275 million.

The Lord Chancellor has since agreed to fund an additional 500 days, but it has become clear that there has been significant over-listing against this budget – with more trials scheduled than the funding allows.

As a result of that, approximately 1,600 sitting days have had to be withdrawn. The level of impact will vary across regions and is being managed closely to ensure there is minimal disruption to all involved.

Heidi Alexander
Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)