Review possible penalties for social media posts, including the use of prison

We call on the Government to urgently review the possible penalties for non-violent offences arising from social media posts, including the use of prison.

181,320 Signatures

Status
Open
Opened
Friday 20th June 2025
Last 24 hours signatures
54
Signature Deadline
Saturday 20th December 2025
Estimated Final Signatures: 189,988

Reticulating Splines

You may be interested in these active petitions

1. Review traditional and social media regulation - 5,736 signatures
2. Reduce the minimum retirement age for Prison Officers to 60 - 11,286 signatures
3. Review and update Provisions 2-10 of The Learner Travel Measure (Wales) 2008. - 2,088 signatures
4. Repeal the 2000 and 2006 Terrorism Acts and review other legislation - 3,524 signatures
5. Review care for sickle cell patients within the NHS - 3,704 signatures

There is serious public concern about the proportionality of sentencing in cases involving opinion-based online speech. We believe imprisoning individuals for posts on social media sets a dangerous precedent and raises wider questions about freedom of expression, proportionality in sentencing, and the misuse of limited prison resources. We consider that alternative sanctions, such as fines or community service, would be more appropriate.


Petition Signatures over time

Government Response

Monday 7th July 2025

The government is committed to ensuring penalties are proportionate and uphold freedom of expression.


Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of our democratic society. It is a long-standing tradition in this country that people are free to demonstrate their views, however uncomfortable these may be to the majority. The government is committed to protecting this right while also ensuring that laws are in place to address harmful, criminal behaviour.

The UK’s Online Safety Act 2023 (“the Act”) reflects this careful balance. It requires platforms to take proportionate steps to tackle illegal content and protect children from harmful material. At the same time, it has been designed to safeguard legal free speech, uphold privacy, and support innovation. The Act does not prevent adults from accessing legal content, nor does it restrict people from posting content that others may find offensive. It is not about individual posts. Instead, Ofcom will assess the systems and processes platforms have in place to manage risks and respond to harm. There are also protections against the over-removal of content, ensuring that lawful speech is not wrongly taken down.

Where an individual is convicted for an offence related to opinion-based online speech, the independent judiciary are responsible for determining appropriate sentences based on the facts of each case and the relevant sentencing guidelines. The sentencing framework provides courts with a range of sentencing powers alongside imprisonment, including fines, community sentences, and suspended sentences. The law also makes clear that imprisonment should only be imposed where no other sentence would be appropriate.

We are committed to ensuring that our justice system protects the public, upholds fundamental rights, and uses custodial sentences only where they are necessary and proportionate.

Ministry of Justice


Constituency Data

Reticulating Splines