Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what funding is available for patients to receive the immunotherapy drug Futibatinib through the NHS; and what criteria his Department uses to determine whether a patient is eligible for any funding.
Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
NHS England funds the use of licensed medicines that have been recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Futibatinib is licensed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and has been recommended by the NICE for the treatment of previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement. However, Taiho Pharma Europe, the company that markets futibatinib, has advised NHS England that they are not currently able to supply it to the National Health Service. Patients with previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement are able to access a different treatment, pemigatinib, which is also licensed and recommended by the NICE for this indication.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the NHS supply of Futibatinib.
Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
NHS England funds the use of licensed medicines that have been recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Futibatinib is licensed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and has been recommended by the NICE for the treatment of previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement. However, Taiho Pharma Europe, the company that markets futibatinib, has advised NHS England that they are not currently able to supply it to the National Health Service. Patients with previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement are able to access a different treatment, pemigatinib, which is also licensed and recommended by the NICE for this indication.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department for Education:
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment she has made of the potential impact of qualified teacher status on the quality of teaching.
Answered by Catherine McKinnell - Minister of State (Education)
Evidence shows that high quality teaching is the most important in-school factor for improving the outcomes of children, which is why qualified teacher status (QTS) is so important. The government is committed to breaking down barriers to opportunity and ensuring the best life chances for every child. As part of this, we are ensuring that new teachers entering the classroom have, or are working towards, QTS.
Teachers who have undertaken initial teacher training (ITT) leading to QTS have demonstrated that they meet all the teachers’ standards at the appropriate level and have had access to high quality, regulated training, followed by a statutory induction. The children in their classes will benefit from having professionally qualified, well-trained teachers.
All primary and secondary ITT courses leading to QTS must incorporate the ITT Core Content Framework (CCF) in full. The CCF is based on the best available evidence of what makes high quality teaching. A review of the CCF alongside the Early Career Framework (ECF) was undertaken during 2023. Building on the evidence underpinning the frameworks, in addition to what the department learnt from the first few years of CCF implementation and ECF delivery, the content of the ITT, CCF and the ECF were reviewed and updated into the combined Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF). This covers the first three years or more of a teacher’s career and articulates what trainee and new teachers need to know and be able to do. From September 2025, the ITTECF will replace the CCF and become mandatory for accredited ITT providers to incorporate into their primary and secondary ITT courses leading to QTS.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department for Education:
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many primary school children are (a) eligible for and (b) registered to receive free school meals in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency.
Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
The most recently published figures on free school meals (FSM) eligibility are from the January 2024 school census, published in June 2024 here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-pupils-and-their-characteristics.
The statistics are based on counts of pupils who are eligible for FSM and are known by their school to be claiming. The department does not hold information on pupils who are eligible but do not claim.
Where statistics were published prior to the changes in parliamentary constituency boundaries, they will be updated to reflect the new boundaries in the next publication of statistics. This is expected to be in June 2025 for schools’ and pupils’ statistics.
The constituency of Gateshead Central and Whickham is made up of elements of two old constituencies: Gateshead and Blaydon. As of January 2024, 35% of pupils at state-funded primary schools in Gateshead and 21% of pupils at state-funded primary schools in Blaydon were eligible for and claiming FSM. This compares with 24% for the whole of England.
The schools and pupils publication includes data at school level. This can be combined with information from ‘Get Information About Schools’ (GIAS) to identify parliamentary constituency, which can be accessed here: https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/. GIAS reflects the changes made following the general election parliamentary constituency changes. Updates to geographical data in GIAS are made on a quarterly basis using data published by the Office for National Statistics.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department for Education:
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many kinship carers are registered in Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency; and if she will make an estimate of the average number of kinship carers registered per constituency.
Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)
The information is not available as requested. The department does not collect information on the number of kinship carers or the average number of registrations per constituency. We do collect information on the numbers of foster care placements with family or friends. The latest figures at national level were published in a statistical release 'Children looked after in England including adoptions: 2022-23', which is available here: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/data-tables/permalink/168a811f-bbe6-4988-a17b-08dcfae39e23. However, information on children looked after is collected at local authority level and is not held centrally for parliamentary constituency areas.
In recent years, there have been two statistical reports on the number of kinship carers that have been produced by other government departments. In both cases, the data was only published at local authority level.
On 7 November 2024, Ofsted published official statistics on 'Fostering in England 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024', which is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fostering-in-england-1-april-2023-to-31-march-2024/fostering-in-england-1-april-2023-to-31-march-2024#family. This set of statistics presented figures on the number of family and friends households and carers, sometimes known as kinship care. The underlying data table provided by Ofsted can be accessed at: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fmedia%2F6729e321541e1dfbf71e8b5c%2FFostering_in_England_underlying_data_2024_final.ods&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
The table indicates that there were 55 approved family and friends households in Gateshead local authority in 2023/24 compared to 45 in 2019/20.
In September 2023, the Office for National Statistics published separate data on the proportion of households with kinship care by local authority area in the data release 'Kinship care in England and Wales: Census 2021', which can be found here: https://www.ons.gov.uk/releases/kinshipcareinenglandandwalescensus2021. These figures were derived using older data from the 2021 national census and showed detailed characteristics of children living in households without their parents but with other relatives in the year 2021. The report also presented the geographical distribution of kinship care households (Section 6). The proportion of households with kinship care arrangements (as a proportion of households of five people or fewer containing anyone aged 17 years and under) in Gateshead local authority was reported as 2.2%.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the average life expectancy is in (a) Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency and (b) each ward of that constituency.
Answered by Andrew Gwynne - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
Life expectancy estimates for Parliamentary constituencies are not available. Life expectancy estimates for local authorities in England are produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The latest available figures from the ONS are for the three-year period 2020 to 2022. In that period, life expectancy at birth for the Gateshead local authority, which includes the constituency of Gateshead and Whickham, was 76.7 years for males, and 81.4 years for females.
Life expectancy estimates for electoral wards are produced by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID). The following table shows the latest available estimates of life expectancy at birth, separated by sex, for the five-year period of 2016 to 2020, in the electoral wards within the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency: | |||
Electoral ward name | Sex | Life expectancy in years |
|
Bridges | Male | 73.7 |
|
Chowdene | Male | 77.8 |
|
Deckham | Male | 74.1 |
|
Dunston and Teams | Male | 73.0 |
|
Dunston Hill and Whickham East | Male | 79.0 |
|
High Fell | Male | 74.5 |
|
Lobley Hill and Bensham | Male | 74.7 |
|
Low Fell | Male | 80.8 |
|
Saltwell | Male | 76.5 |
|
Whickham North | Male | 77.9 |
|
Whickham South and Sunniside | Male | 82.3 |
|
Bridges | Female | 78.6 |
|
Chowdene | Female | 83.1 |
|
Deckham | Female | 77.8 |
|
Dunston and Teams | Female | 81.1 |
|
Dunston Hill and Whickham East | Female | 83.8 |
|
High Fell | Female | 78.6 |
|
Lobley Hill and Bensham | Female | 78.6 |
|
Low Fell | Female | 83.8 |
|
Saltwell | Female | 84.8 |
|
Whickham North | Female | 80.3 |
|
Whickham South and Sunniside | Female | 87.6 |
|
Source: data is from the OHID’s Local Health profile, with further information on male and female life expectancy within the Gateshead local authority available, respectively, at the following two links:
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/local-health/data#page/3/gid/1938133185/pat/502/par/E08000037/ati/8/are/E05001067/iid/93283/age/1/sex/1/cat/-1/ctp/-1/yrr/5/cid/4/tbm/1
https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/local-health/data#page/3/gid/1938133185/pat/502/par/E08000037/ati/8/are/E05001067/iid/93283/age/1/sex/2/cat/-1/ctp/-1/yrr/5/cid/4/tbm/1/page-options/car-do-0
The profile also provides comparable estimates for the Gateshead local authority for the five-year period, from 2016 to 2020.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how much has been (a) budgeted and (b) spent by the Care Quality Commission on the (i) design, (ii) development and (iii) rollout of its new regulatory platform.
Answered by Andrew Gwynne - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) budget for its new regulatory platform was £88.3 million. The actual cost of the regulatory platform is £92.4 million, including the utilisation of contingency, which isn’t accounted for in the budget, and so is the reason for the variance. The actual cost comprises spending on contingent labour, internal staffing, professional services, and non-pay costs. All spending during the CQC’s transformation was subject to appropriate governance, and any procurement was undertaken in line with public sector standards.
The regulatory platform was gradually delivered and implemented over a five-year period to the end of March 2024. The CQC is unable to provide a breakdown of the figures into design, development, and rollout as the regulatory platform was broken down into various services and each of these had a different design, build, test, and deploy phase. These phases overlapped due to the phased rollout.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether he has had recent discussions with his (a) French and (b) Mozambique counterpart on the alleged massacre of civilians by Mozambican military personnel at the TotalEnergies plant in 2021.
Answered by Anneliese Dodds - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
Our High Commissioner in Mozambique has raised the alleged massacre of civilians at the TotalEnergies plant in 2021 with representatives of the Government of Mozambique and local counterparts, alongside France and the US. The UK is offering continued support to Mozambique on responding to the ongoing IS-Mozambique insurgency in Cabo Delgado. This support includes programmes aimed at building local resilience to violent extremism, and security and human rights training of Mozambican Armed Forces.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department takes to determine the level of funding required to facilitate an adequate number of crown court sitting days in each financial year.
Answered by Heidi Alexander - Secretary of State for Transport
Every year, the Government and the Judiciary agree a number of sitting days and an overall budget in what is known as the Concordat process.
In June, the Judiciary reached an agreement with the former Lord Chancellor to sit 106,000 days in the Crown Court within a total budget of £275 million.
The Lord Chancellor has since agreed to fund an additional 500 days, but it has become clear that there has been significant over-listing against this budget – with more trials scheduled than the funding allows.
As a result of that, approximately 1,600 sitting days have had to be withdrawn. The level of impact will vary across regions and is being managed closely to ensure there is minimal disruption to all involved.
Asked by: Mark Ferguson (Labour - Gateshead Central and Whickham)
Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure that leaseholders do not have to fund remedial building modifications associated with aluminium composite material cladding.
Answered by Rushanara Ali - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)
The department collects data on the number of residential buildings over 18 metres in height in England with unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding. In the Gateshead Central and Whickham constituency, fewer than 10 such buildings have been identified, but the exact number cannot be disclosed to protect the privacy of individual buildings.
Leaseholders in buildings over 11 metres or five storeys are protected from paying for remediation of safety defects if the developer has signed the developer remediation contract. Additionally, the Government has made £5.1 billion available through the Building Safety Fund and Cladding Safety Scheme to cover cladding repairs for buildings over 18 metres where no responsible developer can be identified.
Furthermore, Remediation Contribution Orders provide leaseholders with a means to recover historical safety remediation costs from those responsible, such as developers.
The Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE), funded by the department, offers free legal advice to leaseholders.
Developers who have signed the remediation contract are responsible for funding assessments and completing all fire safety work, including non-cladding issues, in line with PAS9980 standards for external works and relevant standards for internal works, all at their own expense.