Mentions:
1: Laura Farris (CON - Newbury) policy in the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002? - Speech Link
2: Stephen Kinnock (LAB - Aberavon) arrive in the UK, they will be detained like criminals for up to eight days before they can apply for bail - Speech Link
3: Stuart C McDonald (SNP - Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) A theoretical right for some kids detained for removal to seek bail after eight days is just not remotely - Speech Link
4: Patrick Grady (SNP - Glasgow North) This is the third major piece of primary legislation on immigration since 2015. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Murray of Blidworth (CON - Life peer) The eight-day period aligns with the existing framework governing immigration bail for those detained - Speech Link
2: Baroness Mobarik (CON - Life peer) Permitting a tribunal to grant bail to only some detained unaccompanied children, after eight days, is - Speech Link
3: Lord Scriven (LDEM - Life peer) no automatic condition of eight days; there is a condition that, at that point, a child can ask for bail - Speech Link
4: None unaccompanied child for purposes of removal) must not be granted immigration bail by the First-tier Tribunal - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) As for the National Crime Agency, its officers who work on organised immigration crime—I met them in - Speech Link
2: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) bail after eight days for unaccompanied children, rather than the 28 days provided for in the Bill. - Speech Link
3: Stuart C McDonald (SNP - Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) It is the ability to apply for bail, as I understand it, after eight days. - Speech Link
4: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) Under section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, the Home Secretary is already - Speech Link
5: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) The NCA’s statutory functions already cover tackling organised immigration crime. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Stuart C McDonald (SNP - Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) It means that a few, but very far from all, will be allowed to apply for bail after eight days. - Speech Link
2: Tim Loughton (CON - East Worthing and Shoreham) Detention policy changed in 2011 and was codified in the Immigration Act 2014. - Speech Link
3: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) If I may answer his point briefly, the amendment in lieu relates to the powers to grant immigration bail - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Bishop of Durham (Bishops - Bishops) Therefore, it is understandable that subjective and visual age assessments by immigration officers can - Speech Link
2: Viscount Hailsham (CON - Life peer) I imagine that immigration officers may get rather impatient and make rather perfunctory decisions. - Speech Link
3: Lord Stewart of Dirleton (CON - Life peer) This task force is committed to dismantling organised immigration crime groups engaged in immigration - Speech Link
4: Lord German (LDEM - Life peer) After 28 days, once the individual is able to apply for immigration bail, they will remain in limbo until - Speech Link
5: None There will need to be tribunal capacity to determine the increase in bail applications. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None Act 1971 (detention under authority of immigration officer for the purposes of the Illegal Migration - Speech Link
2: Lord Bach (LAB - Life peer) I am also grateful for a superb briefing note from Bail for Immigration Detainees, ILPA and the Public - Speech Link
3: Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (LAB - Life peer) lawyer to obtain immigration advice. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None Act 1971 for the purposes of the limitations in paragraph 18B of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 - Speech Link
2: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (LAB - Life peer) bail after 28 days”or that“a writ of habeas corpus”—which, as pointed out in Committee, is very limited - Speech Link
3: Lord Carlile of Berriew (CB - Life peer) currently operates to ensure that immigration detention complies with Article 5 ECHR”. - Speech Link
4: None oversight will continue by way of a writ of habeas corpus in the first 28 days, via an application for bail - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Alex Chalk (CON - Cheltenham) the Crown Court judge to decide whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that, if released on bail - Speech Link
2: Andrew Gwynne (LAB - Denton and Reddish) housing legal aid providers, 21% less mental health support, 27% less welfare support and 30% less immigration - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: John Penrose (CON - Weston-super-Mare) Now that we have introduced a points-based immigration system to choose the best and the brightest from - Speech Link
2: Greg Smith (CON - Buckingham) They blow their budgets because the people set up to deliver them always know that the taxpayer will bail - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Ludford (LDEM - Life peer) It would amend a section of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) - Speech Link
2: Baroness Ludford (LDEM - Life peer) If released on bail, why not simply disappear into irregularity?” - Speech Link
3: Lord Murray of Blidworth (CON - Life peer) Amendment 133 would fundamentally undermine our immigration framework. - Speech Link
4: Baroness Hamwee (LDEM - Life peer) The exemption from restrictions on sharing data for the purposes of immigration enforcement or immigration - Speech Link
5: Lord Bishop of Durham (Bishops - Bishops) officials for the purposes of immigration control. - Speech Link