First elected: 5th May 2005
Left House: 30th May 2024 (Dissolution)
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Philip Davies, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.
A Bill to make provision for a district-wide referendum in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council area on the continued inclusion of the areas covered by the Shipley and Keighley parliamentary constituencies in that district; and for connected purposes.
A Bill to prohibit the use of affirmative and positive action in recruitment and appointment processes; to repeal the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002; and for connected purposes.
The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to make provision for the succession of female heirs to hereditary titles; and for connected purposes.
Road Traffic and Street Works Bill 2023-24
Sponsor - Kit Malthouse (Con)
Local Authority Boundaries Bill 2022-23
Sponsor - Robbie Moore (Con)
Employee Share Ownership (Reform) Bill 2022-23
Sponsor - George Howarth (Lab)
Non-Disclosure Agreements (No. 2) Bill 2021-22
Sponsor - Maria Miller (Con)
Whistleblowing Bill 2021-22
Sponsor - Mary Robinson (Con)
Voter Registration Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Public Sector Exit Payments (Limitation) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Mobile Homes Act 1983 (Amendment) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Freedom of Speech (Universities) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - David Davis (Con)
Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) (No.2) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Pauline Latham (Con)
Bat Habitats Regulation Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Green Belt Protection Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Electronic Cigarettes (Regulation) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Local Authorities (Borrowing and Investment) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Caravan Sites Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Assaults on Retail Workers (Offences) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Alex Norris (LAB)
June Bank Holiday (Creation) Bill 2019-21
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Reservoirs (Flood Risk) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Holly Lynch (Lab)
Unauthorised Encampments Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Toby Perkins (Lab)
Parental Rights (Rapists) and Family Courts Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Louise Haigh (Lab)
Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Pauline Latham (Con)
Drone (Regulation) (No. 2) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Hospital (Parking Charges and Business Rates) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Voter Registration (No. 2) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Coastal Path (Definition) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Child Cruelty (Sentences) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Tom Tugendhat (Con)
Health and Social Care (National Data Guardian) Act 2018
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Value Added Tax Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Act 2018
Sponsor - Maria Caulfield (Con)
Affordable Home Ownership Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Principal Local Authorities (Grounds for Abolition) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Public Sector Exit Payments (Limitation) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Local Audit (Public Access to Documents) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Border Control Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Voter Registration Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Business of the House Commission Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
June Bank Holiday (Creation) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Peter Bone (Ind)
Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018
Sponsor - Chris Bryant (Lab)
BBC Licence Fee (Civil Penalty) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Judicial Appointments and Retirements (Age Limits) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Benefits and Public Services (Restriction) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
International Development Assistance (Definition) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Local Authorities (Removal of Council Tax Restrictions) Bill 2017-19
Sponsor - Christopher Chope (Con)
Crime (Assaults on Emergency Services Staff) Bill 2016-17
Sponsor - Holly Lynch (Lab)
All Select Committees have access to internal legal advice from the Office of Speaker’s Counsel. In the event that external advice is sought, the Office of Speaker’s Counsel will be consulted before external lawyers are appointed.
Only certain committees have power to appoint legal advisers, but Committees may appoint legally qualified persons as Specialist Advisers.
Internal legal advice is provided by salaried members of the Office of Speaker’s Counsel. No additional resources have been required in order to support this inquiry, which has been covered by the ordinary costs of running that Office.
External legal advice has been provided to the Committee by Sir Ernest Ryder KC, at the request of the Committee. The total cost of this advice to date has been £17,850.
Committee inquiries do not have allocated budgets.
The Commission has no involvement in establishing the budget for advice for individual Committee inquiries. Standing Order No. 148A gives the Committee of Privileges power to appoint legal advisers.
The amounts paid will lag the amounts due. The payments due to Sir Ernest Ryder KC for work in each of the following months are as follows:
In respect of the Committee on Standards
December 2021 £1050
January 2022 £4550
February 2022 £6300
March 2022 £700
In respect of the Committee of Privileges
June 2022 £1750
July 2022 £7000
August 2022 £3850
September 2022 £5250
Internal legal advice is provided by the Office of Speaker’s Counsel, staffed by salaried members of the House service, and has been provided as part of their ordinary work. No additional resources have been required in order to advise the House on the Recall of MPs Act 2015. The cost of external legal advice on that Act in the past 12 months has been £2,700 plus VAT.
The hon. Member for Rhondda sent a letter to Mr Speaker enclosing a copy of a legal Opinion on 19 July 2022. There was no other correspondence concerning this matter. The letter and Opinion will not be placed in the Library in order to protect the confidentiality of Members’ correspondence with the Speaker.
The Government Equalities Office does not collect or hold information regarding spend across government on International Women’s Day. It is for individual departments to decide if and how to celebrate this day.
I refer my Hon. Friend for Shipley to the answer I gave him today, UIN: 291337.
The economic effect on churches and vicarages of the ban on the use of house coal has been negligible.
Bishops’ see houses and vicarages have not used house coal for many years and the Church Commissioners are not aware of any churches that still use coal as a form of heating.
The Church of England supports the aim of the Government to improve air quality and public health; the Church has launched several initiatives to support this policy, which include planting more trees on its properties and encouraging churches to increase the biodiversity of their churchyards and green spaces.
The Government Equalities Office’s job is to champion equality and to work with people inside and outside government to help make Britain a place where everyone can succeed without facing discrimination. The GEO leads work on policy relating to women, sexual orientation and transgender equality, and has responsibility for a range of equalities legislation.
All Government departments publish single departmental plans, which for the first time have also included equalities objectives. Due to the ministerial change shortly before these were published, GEO has not produced a plan.
The Secretary of State is considering her priorities for this role and will set these out in due course.
GEO does work with consultants hired under contract working on e.g. the gender pay gap portal, but these people would be procured for such activity via the government procurement service, and are not GEO employees.
GEO does work with consultants hired under contract working on e.g. the gender pay gap portal, but these people would be procured for such activity via the government procurement service, and are not GEO employees.
No civil servants in the Government Equalities Office are provided with an official car or a driver.
The Government Equalities Office and its Ministers are in regular contact with the Equality and Human Rights Commission on a range of issues to do with the running of the Commission.
The Government Equalities Office and its Ministers are in regular contact with the Equality and Human Rights Commission on a range of issues to do with the running of the Commission.
The Government Equalities Office and its Ministers are in regular contact with the Equality and Human Rights Commission on a range of issues to do with the running of the Commission.
The Government Equality Office and its Ministers are in regular contact with the Equality and Human Rights Commission on a range of issues to do with the running of the Commission. These discussions and communications are not routinely published.
The position of ‘Disability Commissioner’ was not a statutory one, and there was no requirement for the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to put proposals about discontinuing it to Ministers. Following a period of consideration and discussion and the winding up of the statutory Disability Committee on 31 March 2017 under the Equality Act 2006 (Dissolution of the Disability Committee) Order 2014 (SI No.406), the Board of the EHRC decided to abolish the role of ‘Disability Commissioner’ at its meeting on 11 May 2017. We will, however, ensure that disabled people continue to be represented on the EHRC.
Eliminating the gender pay gap remains a key priority for the Government Equalities Office and increasing transparency among employers is a significant step towards this. A more diverse and inclusive culture in the workplace benefits everyone.
From April 2017, large employers must publish information showing the differences in average pay and bonuses paid to women and men. We are also taking action to address the main drivers of the gender pay gap because neither families nor the economy can afford to miss out on female talent.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is an independent body and makes its own decisions about handling discrimination and equal pay claims. I have therefore asked the Chief Executive of the Commission to write to the honourable member with the information requested. I will place a copy of the letter in the libraries of both Houses.
The most recent publication of Civil Service Statistics was released by the Office for National Statistics in October 2016, using data gathered from departments as of 31st March 2016. The latest set of data can be found on the ONS website via this weblink:
The Civil Service is committed to being a place where everyone can thrive, regardless of background - with the aim of becoming the most inclusive employer in the UK.
Whilst it is encouraging to see a positive trajectory in terms of diversity representation in the Civil Service, we recognise that there is more to do. That is why in March 2016 the Government published its refreshed Talent Action Plan for the Civil Service, identifying actions to support our staff, increase diversity in the Civil Service and deliver the best possible public services.
According to the latest data from the Office for National Statistics:
(a) In 2015, a total of 861 civil partnerships were formed in England and Wales.
(b) 7,732 couples in England and Wales converted their existing civil partnership into a marriage between 10 December 2014 and 30 June 2015.
(c) A total of 7,366 marriages were formed in England and Wales between same sex couples between 29 March 2014 (when the legislation came into effect) and 30 June 2015.
This information is available online at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages.
The Department commissioned econometric research to estimate the labour market impact of Further Education (FE), which found that FE generates significant economic effects, resulting in sustained higher earnings and increased employment chances. This report was published in December 2014 and is available at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/further-education-comparing-labour-market-economic-benefits-from-qualifications-gained
There is evidence that adult education courses can have positive benefits for people with mental health problems:
To test this evidence more rigorously, the 2014 Autumn Statement announced new funding to pilot adult education courses targeted at adults with mild to moderate mental health problems. Adult education providers are developing courses in partnership with local mental health organisations. The project is being advised by a cross-government steering group which includes senior officials from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, the Department of Health, Public Health England, NHS England and the Department for Work and Pensions.
A consortium led by Ipsos-MORI is undertaking an external evaluation and gathering anonymised evidence about participants’ progress in relation to anxiety, depression and wellbeing. Pilots are using the same standardised and validated assessment scores as used by the NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. For more information, including a map of the projects, go to: http://mhfe.org.uk/clmh-pilots/.
[1] Review and update of research into the wider benefits of adult learning (LSE) 2012
[2] The relationship between adult learning and wellbeing: Evidence from the 1958 National Child Development Study (Institute of Education), 2012
[3] Robotham : Learning for Life: adult learning, mental health and wellbeing (Mental Health Foundation), 2011
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by the Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills to Question 15037:
I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to Parliamentary Question 15037 on 11 November 2015.
All regulations implementing EU legislation that have been introduced since 2013 and their associated impacts can be found on www.legislation.gov.uk. The impact of future regulations that implement EU legislation will also be available on this site in due course.
The Women and Broadband Challenge Fund was launched in May 2014 to help women to take full advantage of superfast broadband to either start a business or to work from home. The programme was extended to the current year with a further investment of £1.1m.
The information is in the tables.
|
Funding 2015-16 Funding 2014-15
|
Area | Funding Allocation |
| Area | Funding Allocation |
Cambridgeshire | £49,390 |
| Cambridgeshire | £75,000 |
Central Bedfordshire and Milton Keynes | £50,000 |
| Central Bedfordshire | £75,000 |
Devon and Somerset | £60,000 |
| Cheshire | £75,000 |
Dorset | £50,000 |
| Devon & Somerset | £75,000 |
Durham | £74,260 |
| Dorset | £75,000 |
East Sussex | £68,000 |
| East Sussex | £75,000 |
Greater Manchester and Cheshire | £87,000 |
| Greater Manchester and Stockport | £75,000 |
Herefordshire and Gloucestershire | £54,500 |
| Herefordshire and Gloucestershire | £48,900 |
Kent | £69,900 |
| Kent | £74,960 |
Leicestershire | £66,700 |
| Newcastle | £75,000 |
Northumberland | £71,000 |
| Northampton shire | £23,000 |
Oxfordshire | £72,250 |
| Shropshire | £75,000 |
Shropshire, Staffordshire and Telford and Wrekin | £146,000 |
| Staffordshire | £67,000 |
South Yorkshire | £67,000 |
| Suffolk/Norfolk | £41,364 |
West Yorkshire | £60,000 |
| Surrey | £75,000 |
Worcestershire | £54,000 |
| Worcestershire | £75,000 |
The Department of Energy and Climate Change spent the following amounts on carbon offsetting in each of the last three years, and with the following companies:
Year | Amount | Company |
2012-13 | £8,292.80 | South Pole Carbon Asset Management |
2013-14 | £305.90 | EDF Trading Ltd. |
2014-15 | £1267.19 | Carbon Footprint Limited |
The core Department for Business Innovation and Skills spent the following on carbon offsetting in the last 3 years:
F/Y 09-10 EDF Trading Ltd - £90063
F/Y 10-11 RWE Supply & Trade in Switzerland SA - £31496.33
F/Y 11-12 South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd - £2902.72
The Student Loans Company (SLC) administers and collects information on student support for each of the UK Government Administrations.
In February 2015, the SLC responded to the Freedom of Information (FOI) request: How many prisoners have received student finance in the UK in the past three years, and how much has been paid? The response provided can be found at the following link: http://www.slc.co.uk/media/886467/foi_response_199-14.pdf
Information on the tuition fee loans recovered from these prisoners could only be provided at a disproportionate cost.
Staff are not prevented from downloading any news applications for use on their work-provided phones and tablets.
The DECC work phone is provided with the standard preloaded news application, which is available by default. No other news applications are authorised.
No news application is authorised for DECC supplied tablets.
GEO users are not prevented from downloading any news applications for use on their work-provided phones and tablets.
The Government believes that standardised packaging is a proportionate and justified response to the considerable public health harm from smoking tobacco. We continue to consider carefully all issues relevant to the policy, including the impact on intellectual property rights.
Information on volumes in offender learning by gender is published in a supplementary table to a Statistical First Release (SFR):
Offender learning is recorded in the Individualised Learner Record (ILR). The ILR does not capture information on those who have declined education.
SFR data is not comparable with published prison population data in a way that would allow calculation of the proportion of offenders who engage in learning.
Most prisoners who study Higher Education (HE) in custody do so through the Open University (OU). Prior to September 2012, the costs of prisoners’ tuition were met from public funds in an arrangement that broadly mirrored the Grant arrangements for other part-time HE students. From September 2012, prisoners have been required to take out, and then repay, Tuition Fee loans in the same way as other learners.
The OU’s additional costs for delivering in custody are met through a Grant from the Department. Table 1 below shows a breakdown of grant payments in each of the last 10 years.
The costs of providing prison university education are found from a variety of sources and gathering the data could only be undertaken at disproportionate cost.
Table 2 gives a breakdown of the number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison in each of the last 10 years. There may be a very small number of prisoners, each year, who will have commenced HE with Universities other than the OU whilst on Release on Temporary Licence. We have no central data on these learners and therefore they are not included in the figures.
Table 1
BIS Grant payments to the Open University for additional costs for delivering OU learning in custody from 2005-06
Financial year | Amount of Grant (£000s) |
2005-06* | 224 |
2006-07* | 234 |
2007-08* | 287 |
2008-09 | 266 |
2009-10 | 870 |
2010-11 | 895 |
2011-12 | 895 |
2012-13 | 912 |
2013-14* | 797 |
2014-15 | 981 |
* where indicated, the table shows available data on Grant funding drawn down rather than Grant available.
Table 2
Number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison from 2004/05
Academic year | OU students (new and continuing) |
2004/05 | 1,128 |
2005/06 | 1,392 |
2006/07 | 1,482 |
2007/08 | 1,562 |
2008/09 | 1,739 |
2009/10 | 1,882 |
2010/11 | 1,809 |
2011/12 | 1,875 |
2012/13 | 1,385 |
2013/14 | 1,117 |
England only
Information supplied by the Open University
Most prisoners who study Higher Education (HE) in custody do so through the Open University (OU). Prior to September 2012, the costs of prisoners’ tuition were met from public funds in an arrangement that broadly mirrored the Grant arrangements for other part-time HE students. From September 2012, prisoners have been required to take out, and then repay, Tuition Fee loans in the same way as other learners.
The OU’s additional costs for delivering in custody are met through a Grant from the Department. Table 1 below shows a breakdown of grant payments in each of the last 10 years.
The costs of providing prison university education are found from a variety of sources and gathering the data could only be undertaken at disproportionate cost.
Table 2 gives a breakdown of the number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison in each of the last 10 years. There may be a very small number of prisoners, each year, who will have commenced HE with Universities other than the OU whilst on Release on Temporary Licence. We have no central data on these learners and therefore they are not included in the figures.
Table 1
BIS Grant payments to the Open University for additional costs for delivering OU learning in custody from 2005-06
Financial year | Amount of Grant (£000s) |
2005-06* | 224 |
2006-07* | 234 |
2007-08* | 287 |
2008-09 | 266 |
2009-10 | 870 |
2010-11 | 895 |
2011-12 | 895 |
2012-13 | 912 |
2013-14* | 797 |
2014-15 | 981 |
* where indicated, the table shows available data on Grant funding drawn down rather than Grant available.
Table 2
Number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison from 2004/05
Academic year | OU students (new and continuing) |
2004/05 | 1,128 |
2005/06 | 1,392 |
2006/07 | 1,482 |
2007/08 | 1,562 |
2008/09 | 1,739 |
2009/10 | 1,882 |
2010/11 | 1,809 |
2011/12 | 1,875 |
2012/13 | 1,385 |
2013/14 | 1,117 |
England only
Information supplied by the Open University
Most prisoners who study Higher Education (HE) in custody do so through the Open University (OU). Prior to September 2012, the costs of prisoners’ tuition were met from public funds in an arrangement that broadly mirrored the Grant arrangements for other part-time HE students. From September 2012, prisoners have been required to take out, and then repay, Tuition Fee loans in the same way as other learners.
The OU’s additional costs for delivering in custody are met through a Grant from the Department. Table 1 below shows a breakdown of grant payments in each of the last 10 years.
The costs of providing prison university education are found from a variety of sources and gathering the data could only be undertaken at disproportionate cost.
Table 2 gives a breakdown of the number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison in each of the last 10 years. There may be a very small number of prisoners, each year, who will have commenced HE with Universities other than the OU whilst on Release on Temporary Licence. We have no central data on these learners and therefore they are not included in the figures.
Table 1
BIS Grant payments to the Open University for additional costs for delivering OU learning in custody from 2005-06
Financial year | Amount of Grant (£000s) |
2005-06* | 224 |
2006-07* | 234 |
2007-08* | 287 |
2008-09 | 266 |
2009-10 | 870 |
2010-11 | 895 |
2011-12 | 895 |
2012-13 | 912 |
2013-14* | 797 |
2014-15 | 981 |
* where indicated, the table shows available data on Grant funding drawn down rather than Grant available.
Table 2
Number of prisoners studying towards an Open University degree whilst in prison from 2004/05
Academic year | OU students (new and continuing) |
2004/05 | 1,128 |
2005/06 | 1,392 |
2006/07 | 1,482 |
2007/08 | 1,562 |
2008/09 | 1,739 |
2009/10 | 1,882 |
2010/11 | 1,809 |
2011/12 | 1,875 |
2012/13 | 1,385 |
2013/14 | 1,117 |
England only
Information supplied by the Open University
A copy of the Department’s internal guidance will be placed in the Libraries of the House.
The Office of the Leader of the House also provides guidance to all Departments on the practice of answering Parliamentary Questions.
The full Guide is available on the gov.uk website at: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-to-parliamentary-work.
A copy of this guidance has already been placed in the libraries of the House. The Office of the Leader of the House of Commons intends to review the Guide to Parliamentary Work in the coming months.
Government welcomed the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s (EHRC) legal framework on board appointments. The Guidance was only recently published (July 2014) so it is still too early to assess its impact.
The EHRC Guidance is clear that the deliberate use of all-women long-lists or shortlists is likely to constitute unlawful sex discrimination. However, where there is no predetermination to draw up an all-women shortlist and an objective and consistent assessment of all candidates demonstrates that the best qualified candidates are all women, an all-women shortlist will be lawful, just as an all-male shortlist would be in the same circumstances.
The framework is also useful in highlighting that there are many good practices that focus on positive measures that will help create an even playing field. This best practice has led to great progress being made in the number of women on boards. For the first time, every board of Britain’s top 100 companies have at least one woman and we now have over 22% women on the boards of our FTSE 100 companies (up from 12.5% in 2011).
We could not have got this far without the excellent work of the Executive Search Community to improve gender parity in our boardrooms.
Below is a breakdown of the number of investigations conducted and convictions obtained by the Illegal Money Lending Teams in Scotland and Wales in each of the last five years, and in England for the last three years.
The England Illegal Money Lending Team was created in April 2011. Equivalent information is not available relating to the regional teams which existed prior to this.
| Investigations | Convictions | ||||
| England | Scotland | Wales | England | Scotland | Wales |
2013/14 | 399 | 39 | 28 | 55 | 0 | 2 |
2012/13 | 522 | 38 | 38 | 34 | 1 | 2 |
2011/12 | 460 | 36 | 37 | 17 | 2 | 4 |
2010/11 | Data not available | 21 | 46 | Data not available | 1 | 6 |
2009/10 | Data not available | 18 | 25 | Data not available | 0 | 5 |
The Illegal Money Lending Teams conduct complex and sensitive investigations. The length of each investigation will be influenced by the circumstances of the specific case. In some instances convictions can only be delivered through months of proactive intelligence gathering and community engagement. Because of this, some cases span multiple years and so there is not necessarily a direct link between the numbers of investigations and the numbers of convictions in any one year.
Government has no plans to change legislation to bring in a register of employees that take their employer to a tribunal, or of private settlements.
Employment tribunals are independent judicial bodies and, in line with the principle of judicial independence, Government cannot comment on, or intervene in, the tribunal's handling of individual cases or any decisions made.
Information on the Dignity at Work conferences is in the process of being placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
Most prisoners who study higher education (HE) in custody do so through the Open University (OU). The table below shows the number of prisoners in England who have completed OU degrees whilst in prison from academic year 2003/04. Prior to September 2012, the costs of prisoners' tuition were met from public funds in an arrangement that broadly mirrored the grant arrangements for other part-time HE students. The OU's additional costs for delivering in custody are met through a grant from the Department. We do not have information on the public funding for these specific learners. From September 2012, prisoners have been required to take out, and then repay, tuition fee loans in the same way as other learners.
Number of prisoners completing Open University degrees in prisons from 2003/04
Award Year (academic year) | Total number of prisoners |
2003/04 | 4 |
2004/05 | 10 |
2005/06 | 14 |
2006/07 | 10 |
2007/08 | 11 |
2008/09 | 22 |
2009/10 | 19 |
2010/11 | 23 |
2011/12 | 26 |
2012/13 | 16 |
Total | 155 |
England only | |
Information supplied by the Open University |
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is an independent body and is responsible for its own staff management, including diversity training. The guidance papers requested are internal documents that were not intended for wider publication. However, I have asked the EHRC to send copies to the Hon Member.
Throughout the pandemic, all Civil Service employers including the Attorney General’s Office (AGO), Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Government Legal Department (GLD) and Her Majesties Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) have followed government guidance in setting out their internal COVID-19 related policies. This includes complying with the Working Safely during Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance which sets out the key actions organisations should take to protect employees and customers in order to reduce the risk of COVID-19 spreading in workplaces, along with carrying out health and safety risk assessments that include the ongoing risk from COVID-19.
The Government’s recent Living with COVID-19 document, sets out how and when the remaining restrictions will be lifted in England. Government guidance was subsequently amended, including the Working Safely guidance. Which alongside risk assessments, sets out further actions organisations can take to protect employees and customers in the workplace, such as ensuring adequate ventilation, frequent cleaning and asking people with COVID-19 to stay home. The guidance advises that people continue to wear face coverings in crowded and enclosed settings where they come into contact with people they do not normally meet, when rates of transmission are high. Employers will continue to align their policies accordingly. Should individuals wish to wear masks as a matter of personal choice this should be respected.
In respect to the SFO estate, The Canadian High Commission (CHC), in their capacity as landlord, have requested SFO employees, contractors and visitors continue to wear face coverings in the common areas of 2 – 4 Cockspur Street. This includes the lobby, lifts, stairs, toilets, and reception.
Throughout the pandemic, the Civil Service, including the Attorney General’s Office (AGO), Government Legal Department (GLD), Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI), have followed, and continue to follow, the latest government guidance in relation to managing the risk of COVID-19 in the workplace, including any variations between the four nations of the UK.
In England, the BEIS ‘Working Safely during coronavirus (COVID-19)’ guidance provides sensible precautions employers can take to manage risk and support their staff. The guidance is available via this link: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-covid-19/offices-factories-and-labs#offices-7-2.
Whilst it is for individual employers to determine which mitigations are appropriate to adopt as they review their workplace risk assessments in light of the updated guidance. Face coverings, which are no longer required by law, are one possible mitigation employers could adopt if the situation / context warranted it.
HMCTS requires all court users to continue to wear face coverings in court buildings. The CPS’s advice to staff, which has been agreed with trade unions is that, unless exempt, all court users are required to wear a face covering in all public areas of court and tribunal buildings.
The AGO, GLD, CPS, SFO and HMCPSI fully support individuals who choose to wear a face covering in the workplace.