Maria Miller Portrait

Maria Miller

Conservative - Former Member for Basingstoke

First elected: 5th May 2005

Left House: 30th May 2024 (Dissolution)


Panel of Chairs
23rd Mar 2020 - 30th May 2024
Speaker's Conference (2022)
19th Oct 2022 - 30th May 2024
Administration Committee
2nd Mar 2020 - 30th May 2024
Speaker's Conference
19th Oct 2022 - 30th May 2024
Joint Committee on the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act
10th Nov 2020 - 30th May 2024
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and International Committee of the Red Cross (Status) Bill
28th Feb 2024 - 6th Mar 2024
Protection from Sex-based Harassment in Public Bill
8th Feb 2023 - 22nd Feb 2023
Online Safety Bill
18th May 2022 - 28th Jun 2022
Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles (Disabled Persons) Bill
2nd Feb 2022 - 9th Feb 2022
Administration Committee
18th Mar 2020 - 18th Mar 2020
Liaison Committee (Commons)
6th Nov 2017 - 6th Nov 2019
Women and Equalities Committee
12th Jul 2017 - 6th Nov 2019
Liaison Committee Sub-committee on the effectiveness and influence of the select committee system
13th Feb 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Draft Domestic Abuse Bill (Joint)
27th Feb 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Draft Domestic Abuse Bill (Joint Committee)
19th Mar 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Draft Domestic Abuse Bill (Joint)
19th Mar 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Draft Domestic Abuse Bill (Joint Committee)
27th Feb 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Commons Reference Group on Representation and Inclusion
15th Nov 2016 - 25th Oct 2018
Liaison Committee (Commons)
10th Sep 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Women and Equalities Committee
18th Jun 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Minister for Women and Equalities
15th Oct 2012 - 9th Apr 2014
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
6th Sep 2012 - 9th Apr 2014
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)
17th May 2010 - 6th Sep 2012
Shadow Minister (Children, Young People and Families)
3rd Jul 2007 - 6th May 2010
Children, Schools and Families
9th Nov 2007 - 17th Dec 2007
Shadow Minister (Work and Pensions)
6th Nov 2006 - 3rd Jul 2007
Shadow Minister (Education)
10th May 2005 - 6th Nov 2006
Trade & Industry
12th Jul 2005 - 23rd Jan 2006


Division Voting information

Maria Miller has voted in 3279 divisions, and 23 times against the majority of their Party.

23 Jun 2020 - Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 45 Conservative Aye votes vs 235 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 238
17 Jun 2020 - Health and Personal Social Services - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 124 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 136
4 Sep 2019 - European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 57 Conservative Aye votes vs 180 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 495
9 Jul 2019 - Northern Ireland (Executive Formation) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 72 Conservative Aye votes vs 84 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 99
14 Mar 2019 - UK’s Withdrawal from the European Union - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 112 Conservative Aye votes vs 188 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 412 Noes - 202
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 151 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 292
21 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 124 Conservative Aye votes vs 134 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 161
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 121 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 340
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 125 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 339
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 126 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 321
5 Feb 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 139 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 175
11 Jul 2012 - Sittings of the House - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 142 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 256
11 Jul 2012 - Sittings of the House - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 139 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 233
7 Sep 2011 - Health and Social Care (Re-committed) Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 115 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 368
4 Mar 2010 - Chair (Terminology) - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 82 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 90
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 65 Conservative No votes vs 77 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 336
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 50 Conservative No votes vs 80 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 314
12 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 44 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 78
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 134 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 392
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 96 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 267
1 Nov 2006 - Legislative Process - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 105 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 354
1 Nov 2006 - Legislative Process - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 55 Conservative No votes vs 69 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 365 Noes - 62
30 Mar 2022 - Health and Care Bill - View Vote Context
Maria Miller voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 72 Conservative Aye votes vs 175 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 188
View All Maria Miller Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
John Bercow (Speaker)
(64 debate interactions)
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
(29 debate interactions)
Kate Green (Labour)
(29 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for Work and Pensions
(669 debate contributions)
Ministry of Justice
(274 debate contributions)
Home Office
(206 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(155 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Online Safety Act 2023
(20,035 words contributed)
Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020
(14,596 words contributed)
Children and Social Work Act 2017
(14,374 words contributed)
Digital Economy Act 2017
(8,244 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Maria Miller's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Maria Miller

19th July 2022
Maria Miller signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 19th July 2022

House of Lords Appointments Commission

Tabled by: Peter Bottomley (Conservative - Worthing West)
That this House expects the prime minister to respect the letter and the spirit of the advice of the House of Lords Appointments Commission in respect of any new peerages he may recommend to the Sovereign.
3 signatures
(Most recent: 19 Jul 2022)
Signatures by party:
Conservative: 2
Independent: 1
26th June 2019
Maria Miller signed this EDM as a sponsor on Wednesday 26th June 2019

DATA COLLECTION POST-NATIONAL REFERRAL MECHANISM

Tabled by: Lord Field of Birkenhead (Crossbench - Birkenhead)
That this House urges the Government to collect data on the outcomes of victims of modern slavery and human trafficking after they have exited the National Referral Mechanism to ensure they are safe, in good health, and are not re-trafficked; and further recommends that the Government collects data on the …
37 signatures
(Most recent: 3 Sep 2019)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 20
Independent: 5
Conservative: 4
Democratic Unionist Party: 2
The Independent Group for Change: 2
Liberal Democrat: 2
Crossbench: 1
Green Party: 1
Plaid Cymru: 1
Scottish National Party: 1
View All Maria Miller's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Maria Miller, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


2 Urgent Questions tabled by Maria Miller

Tuesday 28th June 2022

4 Adjournment Debates led by Maria Miller

Friday 26th April 2024
Tuesday 23rd January 2024
Monday 23rd January 2017
Thursday 19th June 2014

18 Bills introduced by Maria Miller

Introduced: 9th May 2013

This Bill received Royal Assent on 14th May 2014 and was enacted into law.

Introduced: 16th July 2013

A Bill to Make provision approving for the purposes of section 8 of the European Union Act 2011 certain draft decisions under Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

This Bill received Royal Assent on 30th January 2014 and was enacted into law.

Introduced: 5th February 2013

A Bill to make provision for the marriage of same sex couples in England and Wales, about gender change by married persons and civil partners, about consular functions in relation to marriage, for the marriage of armed forces personnel overseas, for permitting marriages according to the usages of belief organisations to be solemnized on the authority of certificates of a superintendent registrar, for the review of civil partnership, for the review of survivor benefits under occupational pension schemes, and for connected purposes.

This Bill received Royal Assent on 17th July 2013 and was enacted into law.

Introduced: 5th February 2013

A Bill to make provision for the marriage of same sex couples in England and Wales, about gender change by married persons and civil partners, about consular functions in relation to marriage, for the marriage of armed forces personnel overseas, for permitting marriages according to the usages of belief organisations to be solemnized on the authority of certificates of a superintendent registrar, for the review of civil partnership, for the review of survivor benefits under occupational pension schemes, and for connected purposes.

This Bill received Royal Assent on 17th July 2013 and was enacted into law.


A Bill to make provision about the status of, and privileges and immunities in connection with, the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and the International Committee of the Red Cross; and for connected purposes.

Commons Completed
Lords - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 17th May 2024
(Read Debate)

A Bill to provide for corporate status of and for certain privileges and immunities to be accorded to the international inter-parliamentary organisation of national and sub-national legislatures of Commonwealth countries known as the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and to its Secretary-General; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 24th March 2023

A Bill to restrict the use of non-disclosure agreements; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 6th May 2022

A Bill to create offences relating to the taking, making and sharing of intimate images without consent; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 6th May 2022

A Bill to prohibit redundancy during pregnancy and maternity leave and for six months after the end of the pregnancy or leave, except in specified circumstances; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 6th May 2022

A Bill to require the Sentencing Council to issue sentencing guidelines in respect of sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Tuesday 12th December 2023

A Bill to require the Sentencing Council to issue sentencing guidelines in respect of sections 58 and 59 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Wednesday 19th July 2023
(Read Debate)

A Bill to make local fire services statutory consultees for industrial lithium-ion battery storage planning permission applications; to make provision about the granting of environmental permits for industrial lithium-ion battery storage; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Wednesday 7th September 2022
(Read Debate)

A Bill to provide for corporate status of and for certain privileges and immunities to be accorded to the international inter-parliamentary organisation of national and sub-national legislatures of Commonwealth countries known as the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and to its Secretary-General; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Tuesday 18th April 2023
Next Event - 2nd Reading
Friday 24th November 2023

A Bill to restrict the use of non-disclosure agreements; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Monday 21st June 2021

A Bill to prohibit redundancy during pregnancy and maternity leave and for six months after the end of the pregnancy or leave, except in specified circumstances; and for connected purposes

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading
Wednesday 8th July 2020
(Read Debate)

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to prohibit making employees redundant during pregnancy, maternity leave and the period of six months from the end of pregnancy; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 21st May 2019
(Read Debate)

A Bill to make provision about the requirements for fire safety information for occupants of certain buildings, including high-rise residential buildings.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 20th March 2018
(Read Debate)

A Bill to make gender identity a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 in place of gender reassignment and to make associated provision for transgender and other persons; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Thursday 1st December 2016
(Read Debate)

Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
21 Other Department Questions
19th Sep 2023
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, pursuant to the Answer of 11 September 2023 to Question 195825 on UN Commission on the Status of Women, what process was used to appoint the UK Youth Delegate to UN Commission on the Status of Women; how many applications were received for that position; and what the gender was of the successful applicant.

The UK Youth Delegate to the UN Commission on the Status of Women was not appointed through a selection process. The delegate was male. This was a trial appointment and we are currently evaluating the success of this initiative.

1st Sep 2023
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, which Commons Minister is responsible for the UK's participation in the UN Commission on the Status of Women.

The Minister for Women and Equalities has overall responsibility for the Government’s participation in the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), supported by ministers across government particularly those from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

For the first time, in 2023, the Government appointed a young person as a UN Women Youth Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women. This was a trial appointment and we are currently evaluating the success of this initiative.

The priority theme for CSW68 is Accelerating the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls by addressing poverty and strengthening institutions and financing with a gender perspective. The Government will continue to promote gender equality internationally at CSW and elsewhere in line with the priorities set out in the International women and girls strategy 2023 to 2030 published in March.

1st Sep 2023
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, how many applications were received for the position of Youth Delegate for the UN Commission on the Status of Women in 2023.

The Minister for Women and Equalities has overall responsibility for the Government’s participation in the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), supported by ministers across government particularly those from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

For the first time, in 2023, the Government appointed a young person as a UN Women Youth Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women. This was a trial appointment and we are currently evaluating the success of this initiative.

The priority theme for CSW68 is Accelerating the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls by addressing poverty and strengthening institutions and financing with a gender perspective. The Government will continue to promote gender equality internationally at CSW and elsewhere in line with the priorities set out in the International women and girls strategy 2023 to 2030 published in March.

1st Sep 2023
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, when the Youth Delegate for the 68th UN Commission on the Status of Women will be announced.

The Minister for Women and Equalities has overall responsibility for the Government’s participation in the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), supported by ministers across government particularly those from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

For the first time, in 2023, the Government appointed a young person as a UN Women Youth Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women. This was a trial appointment and we are currently evaluating the success of this initiative.

The priority theme for CSW68 is Accelerating the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls by addressing poverty and strengthening institutions and financing with a gender perspective. The Government will continue to promote gender equality internationally at CSW and elsewhere in line with the priorities set out in the International women and girls strategy 2023 to 2030 published in March.

1st Sep 2023
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, which Department is responsible for appointing the UK Youth Delegate to UN Commission on the Status of Women; what the process is for the appointment; and which Minister is responsible for this process.

The Minister for Women and Equalities has overall responsibility for the Government’s participation in the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), supported by ministers across government particularly those from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

For the first time, in 2023, the Government appointed a young person as a UN Women Youth Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women. This was a trial appointment and we are currently evaluating the success of this initiative.

The priority theme for CSW68 is Accelerating the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls by addressing poverty and strengthening institutions and financing with a gender perspective. The Government will continue to promote gender equality internationally at CSW and elsewhere in line with the priorities set out in the International women and girls strategy 2023 to 2030 published in March.

23rd Feb 2022
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure the Online Safety Bill improves protections for women and girls.

The Government is committed to tackling violence against women and girls, and we have taken significant steps to strengthen the forthcoming Online Safety Bill to improve protections for women and girls. Offences relating to sexual images (including revenge and extreme pornography), harassment and cyberstalking will be included in the list of priority offences on the face of the Bill. As a result, platforms will have to take steps to search for, remove and stop people from being exposed to this content and criminal behaviour. We have also accepted the Law Commission’s recommendations to introduce a new harms-based offence and threatening communications offence, which will go further to tackle harmful online abuse of women and girls. We are also making changes to the Bill to ensure children are protected from pornography content, wherever it appears online.

11th Jan 2022
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the House of Commons Commission, what the Commission's policy is on the use of non-disclosure agreements in employment severance agreements by organisations supplying goods and services.

No such policy exists nor is one in active contemplation. The use of non-disclosure agreements in severance agreements is widespread and lawful.

In entering into contracts with other organisations, we do not want to restrict their freedom of action in dealing with their own staff in line with their own terms and conditions and in accordance with the law. This is important in ensuring that our contracts are not onerous to manage for either party.

11th Jan 2022
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many House of Commons employment severance agreements included the use of a non-disclosure agreement in each of the last five years.

The House’s approach to the use of NDA clauses follows the 2015 Cabinet Office Guidance on Settlement Agreements, Special Severance Payments and Confidentiality Clauses on Termination of Employment. Since January 2015, it was decided that NDA clauses should no longer be included as a matter of course. Each case is considered on its merits.

The figures for each of the last five years are:

2021 – nil

2020 – nil

2019 – nil

2018 – 2 agreements with NDAs

2017 – 6 agreements with NDAs

11th Jan 2022
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the House of Commons Commission, what the Commission's policy is on the use of non-disclosure agreements as part of employment severance agreements.

The House of Commons does not include a non-disclosure clause as standard in severance (settlement) agreements with employees. The House hasn’t included them as standard since 2015, and has not used any since 2018, but there is not a blanket policy in place preventing the House from using one in appropriate circumstances.

11th Jan 2022
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the House of Commons Commission, what provisions there are in House of Commons employment contracts to protect the confidentiality of work done in the House of Commons, including in the event that employment ceases.

All employees of the House are required to sign a confidentially statement at the start of their employment. The confidentiality statement not only refers to handling personal information but also Classified and Official Secret information too. There is also a statement about confidentiality in the staff handbook and, at the end of employment, a reminder of the confidentiality statement is included in the letter given to departing staff.

16th Nov 2021
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many confirmed positive covid-19 tests there have been among Parliamentary pass holders who work on the Parliamentary estate for each of the last 10 weeks; and what estimate the House Authorities have made of the number of Parliamentary pass holders who were working on the Parliamentary estate for each of the last 10 weeks.

Following further review of cases linked to the estate, UKHSA have identified 143 positive cases occurring between the 4th October–16th November. However, due to delays in reporting, additional cases may yet be identified that tested positive between 12th November and 16th November.

This review identified that over 50% of positive cases had not been reported by members of the Parliamentary community to the Parliamentary test and trace team.

Data recorded by the House is held solely for the purpose of supporting test and trace and is only recorded for 21 days where an individual notifies us.

Details on weekly cases are held for the last five weeks only following the UKHSA review. The maximum number of passholders working on the estate for any day in the relevant week are included for the equivalent periods.

Week

Positive Cases

Maximum daily number of passholders

5/11 – 11/11

20

4018

29/10 – 4/11

28

4364

22/10 – 28/10

43

4398

15/10 – 21/10

21

4504

08/10 – 14/10

12

3158

01/10 – 07/10

2204

24/09 – 30/09

2108

17/09 – 23/09

3644

10/09 – 16/09

4280

03/09 – 09/09

4261

24th Oct 2019
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, when she plans to publish research commissioned into the stereotypical expectations of men and boys announced on 19 November 2018.

The Government Equalities Office will publish research on engaging men and boys on gender expectations, attitudes and behaviours early next year as planned.

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
30th Oct 2018
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, with reference to the letter from the Chief Executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission to the Clerk of the House of 19 March 2018 on Newsnight report into bullying and harassment, if the Commission will publish the response to that letter; and what information was provided to the Equality and Human Rights Commission in response to the questions listed at the end of that letter.

The Clerk of the House replied to the letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission on 23 March 2018. A copy of that reply has already been sent to the Women and Equalities Committee and has been placed in the Library.

The letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission listed a number of matters they wished to discuss at a meeting. These were discussed at a meeting on 23 April 2018.

17th Jul 2017
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, what the average time was of the rise of the House on each day of the week in parliamentary Session 2016-17.

The average time of the rise of the House on each day during the 2016–17 session are as follows:

Monday: 9.57pm[1]

Tuesday: 7.24pm

Wednesday: 7.31pm

Thursday: 5.16pm

Friday: 2.57pm

[1] This does not take account of the special sitting on Monday 20 June 2016 when the House was recalled and adjourned at 3.40pm to attend the service at St Margaret’s Church.

17th Jul 2017
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, what was the (a) earliest and (b) latest time of day at which a division took place in the (i) 2014-15, (ii) 2015-16 and (iii) 2016-17 Parliamentary Session.

The earliest and latest time of day at which a division took place was as follows:

(i) 2014–15 Session

Earliest: 9.34am (27 February 2015 – Motion to Sit in Private)

Latest: 10.29pm (23 March 2015 – Budget Resolutions and economic situation: Corporation tax)

(ii) 2015–16 Session

Earliest: 9.34am (12 October 2015 – Motion to Sit in Private)

Latest: 12.28am (7 September 2015 – European Union Referendum Bill – Third Reading)

(iii) 2016–17 Session

Earliest: 9.34am (4 November 2016 – Motion to Sit in Private)

Latest: 12.21am (6 February 2017 – European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill — Consideration of Lords Amendments)

28th Nov 2016
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, with reference to page 22 of the Government response to the First Report from the Women and Equalities Committee, Session 2015-16, on Transgender Equality, Cm 9301, published in July 2016, what the outcomes have been of the Government's internal review of gender markers in official documents.

In our response to the Committee in July, the Government committed to a range of significant actions designed to improve the lives and experiences of transgender people.

We agree with the Committee that issues raised are serious and complex. That is why we are engaging with stakeholders to make sure any changes we make are based on evidence and user needs.

On the action plans specifically, we are in the process of collating updates and will publish a summary in 2017.

On reforms to the Gender Recognition Act, we’ve been engaging with ministers on how to take this commitment forward and we have begun our stakeholder engagement programme by meeting the Gender Recognition Panel.

We will provide an update on the Government’s progress in 2017.

28th Nov 2016
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, with reference to page 30 of the Government response to the First Report from the Women and Equalities Committee, Session 2015-16, on Transgender Equality, Cm 9301, published in July 2016, to which heads of profession she wrote highlighting the need for training on transgender issues for their profession and asking them to introduce training if not already available and to monitor the effectiveness of any training provided; and what information she holds on steps taken by heads of profession in response to those letters.

In our response to the Committee in July, the Government committed to a range of significant actions designed to improve the lives and experiences of transgender people.

We agree with the Committee that issues raised are serious and complex. That is why we are engaging with stakeholders to make sure any changes we make are based on evidence and user needs.

On the action plans specifically, we are in the process of collating updates and will publish a summary in 2017.

On reforms to the Gender Recognition Act, we’ve been engaging with ministers on how to take this commitment forward and we have begun our stakeholder engagement programme by meeting the Gender Recognition Panel.

We will provide an update on the Government’s progress in 2017.

28th Nov 2016
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, with reference to page 8 of the Government response to the First Report from the Women and Equalities Committee, Session 2015-16, on Transgender Equality, column 9301, published in July 2016, and pursuant to the Answer of 15 September 2016 to Question 45657, what progress the Government has made on (a) publishing update reports on the documents Working for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality: Moving Forward and Advancing transgender equality: a plan for action, published in 2011 and (b) producing a new action plan on transgender equality.

In our response to the Committee in July, the Government committed to a range of significant actions designed to improve the lives and experiences of transgender people.

We agree with the Committee that issues raised are serious and complex. That is why we are engaging with stakeholders to make sure any changes we make are based on evidence and user needs.

On the action plans specifically, we are in the process of collating updates and will publish a summary in 2017.

On reforms to the Gender Recognition Act, we’ve been engaging with ministers on how to take this commitment forward and we have begun our stakeholder engagement programme by meeting the Gender Recognition Panel.

We will provide an update on the Government’s progress in 2017.

28th Nov 2016
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, with reference to page 11 of the Government response to the First Report from the Women and Equalities Committee, Session 2015-16, on Transgender Equality, column 9301, published in July 2016, what progress the Government has made on reviewing the Gender Recognition Act 2004 to determine whether changes can be made to streamline and de-medicalise the gender recognition process.

In our response to the Committee in July, the Government committed to a range of significant actions designed to improve the lives and experiences of transgender people.

We agree with the Committee that issues raised are serious and complex. That is why we are engaging with stakeholders to make sure any changes we make are based on evidence and user needs.

On the action plans specifically, we are in the process of collating updates and will publish a summary in 2017.

On reforms to the Gender Recognition Act, we’ve been engaging with ministers on how to take this commitment forward and we have begun our stakeholder engagement programme by meeting the Gender Recognition Panel.

We will provide an update on the Government’s progress in 2017.

10th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many prosecutions the National Measurement Office have brought for offences relating to illegally felled timber in each of the last five years.

This is a matter for the National Measurement Office.

4th Nov 2014
To ask the Attorney General, how many cases including the sending of a nude or sexually explicit electronic image of an individual under the age of 18 where the perpetrator of the crime is under the age of 18 have been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service in the last three years; how many such cases have been taken forward for prosecution; and how many such prosecutions have been successful.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not collect specific data on suspects referred to the CPS for a charging decision where the sending of sexually explicit images of children is alleged. However, data is available to indicate the number of offences charged, in which a prosecution commenced at magistrates’ courts, for offences of involving indecent images of children.

The two main offence provisions for the prosecution of offences relating to indecent images of children are section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978 (making, distributing, showing or advertising indecent images of children) and section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (possession of indecent images of children).

The table below sets out the number of offences charged by way of the above legislation, in each of the last three years, in England and Wales.

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

Protection of Children Act 1978 { 1 }

15,599

14,694

15,574

Criminal Justice Act 1988 { 160 }

3,885

3,849

4,265

Data Source: CPS Management Information System

It is not possible to disaggregate offences which relate to indecent images sent by way of an electronic device as opposed to other indecent image offences, cases where a conviction was obtained or the age of the perpetrator without reviewing individual case files incurring disproportionate cost.

12th Jan 2022
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, which Government departments have policies in place designed to prevent the misuse of non disclosure agreements or confidentially clauses in employment severance agreements.

The Government has published guidance on the use of confidentiality clauses and is clear that these types of clauses should not be used to stifle or discourage staff from raising concerns, and that they should only be used when necessary and not be included in settlement agreements as a matter of course.

All Government departments are expected to follow this guidance which can be found at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-service-settlement-agreements-special-severance-payments-and-confidentiality-clauses.

12th Jan 2022
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the Government’s policy on the use of non-disclosure agreements in employment severance agreements is.

The Government has published guidance on the use of confidentiality clauses and is clear that these types of clauses should not be used to stifle or discourage staff from raising concerns, and that they should only be used when necessary and not be included in settlement agreements as a matter of course.

All Government departments are expected to follow this guidance which can be found at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-service-settlement-agreements-special-severance-payments-and-confidentiality-clauses.

9th Feb 2021
What assessment he has made of the effect of the covid-19 outbreak on employers' attitudes towards flexible working.

During the pandemic, up to 47% of the workforce have worked from home. While this is not the only form of flexible working, we hope this will have a positive impact on attitudes towards greater flexibility in when and where work is done. We will build on this as we look to make flexible working the default.

22nd Nov 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, pursuant to the Answer of 25 June 2018 to Question 155213 on conditions of employment: pregnancy, when the Government plans to publish a review of employment protections for women who are pregnant or returning from maternity leave.

The review is underway, and we plan to publish a consultation in due course.

10th Sep 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many people have been (a) prosecuted and (b) convicted for offences relating to filing false information with Companies House under section 1112 of the Companies Act 2006 in each of the last 5 years.

Since January 2013, criminal proceedings have been instituted by the Department against one person for two offences under s1112 Companies Act 2006. A guilty plea was entered to one offence and the second was withdrawn.

19th Jun 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with reference to page eight of the the Government response to Women and Equality Select Committee Report on Pregnancy and Maternity Discrimination, published in January 2017, what progress is being made to consider and bring forward proposals to ensure that employment protections are sufficient for those who are pregnant or returning from maternity leave.

The Government was responding to a recommendation about protection from redundancy. In the response to the Matthew Taylor Review of modern working practices, the Government committed to review the legislation relating to redundancy protection and consider whether this is sufficient. This work is underway.

19th Jun 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate he has made of the number of cases of maternity discrimination that have been taken to Employment Tribunals in each of the past five years.

The number of cases of maternity discrimination taken to employment tribunals can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics. The data for the last five years is as follows:

Number of receipts (claims):

Financial Year Suffer a detriment/unfair dismissal maternity

  • 2013/14 - 1,248
  • 2014/15 - 790
  • 2015/16 - 865
  • 2016/17 - 872
  • 2017/18 - 1,336

Number of disposals (cases closed):

Financial Year Suffer a detriment/unfair dismissal maternity

  • 2013/14 - 1,426
  • 2014/15 - 955
  • 2015/16 - 856
  • 2016/17 - 779
  • 2017/18 - 930
19th Jun 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate the Government has made of the number of women who could be experiencing discrimination at work whilst (a) pregnant, (b) on maternity leave and (c) returning from maternity leave; and what plans the Government has to regularly update those figures.

In 2016 EHRC published the findings of a substantial research programme (commissioned jointly with the then Department for Business Innovation and Skills) based on interviews with 3,034 employers and 3,254 mothers. This found that around one in nine mothers reported that they were either dismissed; made compulsorily redundant, where others in their workplace were not; or treated so poorly they felt they had to leave their job.

The next estimate will be in 2020 to allow time for the current package of interventions to take effect. ln the interim Government will monitor others’ findings (such as the recent EHRC poll on employer attitudes) for any signs that the interventions are starting to have an impact or of changes in employers’ practices.

24th May 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what process her Department has for deciding whether (a) additional electricity generation is needed in a local area and (b) that generation should be centralised or decentralised

The Government does not determine where new generation should connect to the network; this is a commercial decision for individual developers. The Department has, however, introduced the Capacity Market, which is designed to incentivise both new generation investment and maximise the use of existing assets to ensure that Great Britain as a whole has a secure, affordable and clean energy supply. On 6 May, Government announced that it would buy more capacity, earlier, and bring forward the start of the Capacity Market delivery period by a year to 2017/18.

The network charging regimes (through the locational price zones at the high-voltage transmission network or connection charging regime at the lower voltage distribution network) provide price signals that encourage developers to connect where it is economically efficient to do so, helping to limit costs passed through to consumers. The charging regimes are designed by the network industry in line with the requirement to be cost-reflective, and are approved by Ofgem.

New generation connecting above 132kv will connect to the transmission network, whereas at that level and below, it will connect to the local distribution network. In Scotland, 132kv also forms part of the transmission network.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate the Government has made of the number of women who could be experiencing discrimination at work whilst (a) pregnant, (b) on maternity leave and (c) returning from maternity leave; and what plans the Government has to regularly update those figures.

In 2016 EHRC published the findings of a substantial research programme (commissioned jointly with the then Department for Business Innovation and Skills) based on interviews with 3,034 employers and 3,254 mothers. This found that around one in nine mothers reported that they were either dismissed; made compulsorily redundant, where others in their workplace were not; or treated so poorly they felt they had to leave their job.

The next estimate will be in 2020 to allow time for the current package of interventions to take effect. ln the interim Government will monitor others’ findings (such as the recent EHRC poll on employer attitudes) for any signs that the interventions are starting to have an impact or of changes in employers’ practices.

15th Jun 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will take steps to respond to the findings of the report published by the Children's Commissioner and the NSPCC in June 2016, on a quantitative and qualitative examination of the impact of online pornography on the values, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of children and young people, to ensure that children are not able to view pornographic material on (a) social media and (b) any other platform.

The Government has noted with interest the findings of this report, and particularly that children were as likely to see pornographic content online inadvertently as they were to seek it out deliberately. This further strengthens the case for the action the Government is taking on the manifesto commitment to require age verification controls for access to online pornography, which will make it harder for children to access this content online. Our preferred approach was set out in our consultation published in February this year. Government is currently finalising our response to this consultation

28th Nov 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to page 29 of the Government response to the First Report from the Women and Equalities Committee, Session 2015-16, on Transgender Equality, Cm 9301, published in July 2016, what the findings were of the study commissioned to ascertain the adequacy and consistency of knowledge on gender variance in initial social work training and continuous professional development.

The Department for Education is currently in the process of commissioning the study referred to which is expected to be completed by the end of March 2017. Findings will be published at a later date.

15th Jun 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take steps in response to the findings of the report published by the Children's Commissioner and the NSPCC in July 2016, on a quantitative and qualitative examination of the impact of online pornography on the values, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of children and young people, to ensure that all children have access to age-appropriate PSHE at school.

Education can play a vital role in helping young people understand healthy relationships and identify those which are unhealthy. It can also give young people the confidence and knowledge they need to stay safe and respect others. Sex and relationships education (SRE) must be taught in all maintained secondary schools and we expect academies to teach it as part of a broad and balanced curriculum.

Schools can also choose to teach about the impact of pornography in their Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) lessons drawing on the guidance and resources available. The PSHE Association has produced a non-statutory programme of study as guidance for teachers, which includes teaching about the impact of pornography. The Government publishes guidance for schools teaching SRE, which is available on GOV.UK at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/283599/sex_and_relationship_education_guidance.pdf.

The guidance makes clear that all SRE should be age-appropriate, and that schools should make sure young people develop positive values and a moral framework that will guide their decisions, judgments and behaviour. This is particularly relevant to sexual consent, and the guidance makes clear that all young people should understand how the law applies to sexual relationships. The guidance covers the importance of marriage, loving and stable relationships, consent and how to avoid exploitation and abuse.

The Government has made it clear in the introduction to the framework to the national curriculum that all schools should teach PSHE and we are working to ensure that all young people receive high quality, age-appropriate PSHE and SRE.

4th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many new (a) primary and (b) secondary school places have been created in each parliamentary constituency since 2010.

The Department for Education collects information from local authorities on the number of school places in state-funded primary and secondary schools as part of the annual School Capacity Collection. The most recent data available relates to the position at May 2013 and is published online at:

www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-capacity-academic-year-2012-to-2013

Equivalent data for 2010 can be found at:

www.gov.uk/government/statistics/school-capacity-2009-to-2010-final

Data to May 2014 will become available shortly.

A comparison of the position in 2010 and 2013, showing the net change in capacity, is given in the table below. Positive figures indicate an overall increase in places; negative figures indicate an overall decrease in places. A decrease in places can be the consequence of actions to address oversupply and remove unsuitable place provision, or of restructuring the school system. Figures for local authorities that have restructured middle school provision or introduced all-through provision between 2010 and 2013 must be compared with caution.

The Department does not collect capacity data at constituency level; Basingstoke constituency lies within Hampshire local authority.

(a)

Change in number of places in primary schools (including all through and middle-deemed primary schools)

2010 to 2013

(b)

Change in number of places in secondary schools (including all-through and middle deemed secondary schools)

2010 to 2013

Barking and Dagenham

6,538

2,567

Barnet

2,449

1,190

Barnsley

-248

-380

Bath and North East Somerset

282

599

Bedford

1,595

862

Bexley

1,683

529

Birmingham

10,028

6,545

Blackburn with Darwen

492

407

Blackpool

208

24

Bolton

2,584

823

Bournemouth

1,075

1,513

Bracknell Forest

807

112

Bradford

5,077

817

Brent

2,768

2,465

Brighton and Hove

1,721

566

Bristol, City of

2,774

1,855

Bromley

1,266

1,416

Buckinghamshire

500

1,412

Bury

-63

619

Calderdale

368

1,409

Cambridgeshire

3,527

312

Camden

235

1,485

Central Bedfordshire

316

1,267

Cheshire East

-106

1,791

Cheshire West and Chester

1,121

450

City of London

0

.

Cornwall

535

128

Coventry

3,333

817

Croydon

3,123

1,816

Cumbria

755

493

Darlington

189

2

Derby

186

1,222

Derbyshire

994

-58

Devon

3,493

1,473

Doncaster

560

44

Dorset

-281

634

Dudley

1

67

Durham

1,145

-545

Ealing

2,775

1,596

East Riding of Yorkshire

-79

503

East Sussex

141

-546

Enfield

4,491

86

Essex

1,040

-48

Gateshead

69

287

Gloucestershire

1,048

-405

Greenwich

1,908

-788

Hackney

1,030

4,493

Halton

-360

2,049

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,433

1,597

Hampshire

1,286

-881

Haringey

1,297

146

Harrow

-2,199

5,672

Hartlepool

584

-205

Havering

400

840

Herefordshire

-368

-210

Hertfordshire

5,889

3,288

Hillingdon

1,352

1,685

Hounslow

2,263

1,403

Isle of Wight

2,868

-4,254

Isles of Scilly

20

.

Islington

7

-299

Kensington and Chelsea

441

-108

Kent

2,189

5,952

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

789

1,938

Kingston upon Thames

2,529

64

Kirklees

1,669

-313

Knowsley

-1,460

-822

Lambeth

1,913

-563

Lancashire

681

322

Leeds

5,074

1,973

Leicester

1,600

-1,810

Leicestershire

-623

1,677

Lewisham

2,836

-10

Lincolnshire

231

865

Liverpool

586

-3,020

Luton

2,636

162

Manchester

5,284

2,944

Medway

119

233

Merton

1,576

-2

Middlesbrough

-86

-755

Milton Keynes

1,452

648

Newcastle upon Tyne

106

-83

Newham

2,534

1,355

Norfolk

322

-81

North East Lincolnshire

824

-2,443

North Lincolnshire

396

-1,067

North Somerset

1,585

319

North Tyneside

48

428

North Yorkshire

-905

-73

Northamptonshire

1,676

1,923

Northumberland

803

-2,437

Nottingham

941

1,722

Nottinghamshire

1,517

453

Oldham

649

-502

Oxfordshire

3,560

1,863

Peterborough

1,622

478

Plymouth

1,640

526

Poole

300

336

Portsmouth

227

36

Reading

973

113

Redbridge

3,323

3,285

Redcar and Cleveland

280

-467

Richmond upon Thames

1,986

228

Rochdale

1,076

-1,480

Rotherham

550

143

Rutland

-275

393

Salford

641

-294

Sandwell

1,007

1,212

Sefton

-626

-1,674

Sheffield

2,086

-328

Shropshire

-2,468

188

Slough

3,154

340

Solihull

-159

371

Somerset

-6

1,023

South Gloucestershire

-553

-154

South Tyneside

-428

-337

Southampton

2,079

240

Southend-on-Sea

522

982

Southwark

1,926

-475

St. Helens

432

-42

Staffordshire

1,064

1,170

Stockport

300

-666

Stockton-on-Tees

532

-570

Stoke-on-Trent

2,417

-824

Suffolk

5,635

-5,637

Sunderland

-111

565

Surrey

4,177

1,230

Sutton

1,302

1,016

Swindon

2,434

837

Tameside

1,102

-15

Telford and Wrekin

924

1,698

Thurrock

1,948

1,922

Torbay

18

-513

Tower Hamlets

2,405

908

Trafford

786

923

Wakefield

204

11

Walsall

272

320

Waltham Forest

2,291

-145

Wandsworth

1,534

-863

Warrington

-16

-453

Warwickshire

1,538

810

West Berkshire

181

232

West Sussex

3,444

1,897

Westminster

-94

684

Wigan

577

-1,124

Wiltshire

910

1,847

Windsor and Maidenhead

1,079

476

Wirral

-155

-1,425

Wokingham

778

1,050

Wolverhampton

-283

-453

Worcestershire

338

803

York

424

320

ENGLAND

188,681

74,183

Source: School Capacity Survey 2010 and 2013

11th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment Ofsted has made of primary and secondary schools' policies regarding sexting and the incidence of sexting in such schools in England and Wales.

This is a matter for Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw. A copy of his reply will be placed in the library of the House.

4th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many incidents of sexting among pupils have occurred in schools in England and Wales in each of the last five years; and what guidance her Department issues to schools on this matter.

The Department for Education does not collect data on incidents of sexting among pupils. All schools in England are required, by law, to have a behaviour policy which includes measures to tackle bullying, including cyberbullying which covers sexting. We have not produced specific advice on sexting but we have issued clear and succinct advice to schools on preventing and tackling bullying, including cyberbullying. This information is published online at:

www.gov.uk/government/publications/preventing-and-tackling-bullying

Certain instances of bullying, harassment and threatening behaviour, including the sharing of indecent images should be reported to the police. This is made clear in our advice to schools. Good schools create an ethos where bullying, including cyberbullying and sexting do not happen in the first place, and they deal with it promptly if it does occur to ensure the victim does not suffer continuing distress.

From September 2014, e-safety is being taught at all four key stages of the curriculum in England. It covers responsible, respectful and secure use of technology, as well as ensuring that pupils are taught age-appropriate ways of reporting any concerns they may have about what they see or encounter online.

Children and young people are being taught about the different and escalating risks they may encounter as they get older (initially relating to online content, then to the conduct of and contact with others, which can include sexting).

Schools can help to contain cyber-bullying and sexting during the school day by banning or limiting the use of mobile phones and other electronic devices. Search powers included in the Education Act 2011 have given teachers the power to search for, and if necessary delete, inappropriate images (or files) on electronic devices, including mobile phones.

Ofsted now holds schools clearly to account for how well they deal with behaviour and bullying. Since January 2012, inspectors must consider pupils’ freedom from bullying, including cyberbullying, harassment and discrimination. In January 2014, Ofsted produced briefing for inspectors when considering e-safety in schools. This makes clear that school inspectors should consider the schools’ ability to protect and educate pupils in their use of technology.

21st Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what guidance her Department makes available to farmers on the management of arable field margins to provide benefits for wildlife.

Defra provides guidance to farmers and other land managers on the management of arable field margins as part of agri-environment schemes such as Environmental Stewardship. The new Countryside Stewardship scheme will continue and enhance this guidance.

Farmers not wanting to sign up to an agri-environment scheme can obtain advice from a variety of sources, including the Campaign for the Farmed Environment.

23rd Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 10 September 2014 to Question 208409, what the maximum level of fine and sanction available for illegal tree felling was in each year since 1982; and when the level of fine or sanction was last reviewed and last increased under provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 1982.

The penalty for felling a tree without the authority of a felling licence is prescribed by section 17 of the Forestry Act 1967. A person guilty of this offence is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale or twice the sum which appears to the court to be the value of the tree, whichever is the higher. The standard scale of fines was introduced into the Forestry Act by the Criminal Justice Act 1982.

Changes to the standard scale are made the Ministry of Justice and apply uniformly across all offences using the standard scale. The level 4 fine maximum at present is £2,500.

Since 1982, the standard scale has been revised as follows:

Level:

1982:

1992 (as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1991):

1

£25

£200

2

£50

£500

3

£200

£1,000

4

£500

£2,500

5

£1,000

£5,000

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 12 September 2014 to Question 208678, what guidance her Department issues on the meaning of Best Available Technology to remove phosphates from water.

Neither Defra nor the Environment Agency has issued guidance on the meaning of Best Available Technology to remove phosphates from sewage.

In order to meet the Environmental Quality Standards required by the Water Framework Directive, the Environment Agency sets permit limits for sewage discharge works. The appropriate technology employed to achieve those permit limits is a matter for the operator and is not specified by the Environment Agency.

10th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many prosecutions the Forestry Commission has brought for the illegal felling of trees in each of the last five years.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 10 September 2014, Official Report, columns 601W – 602W.

9th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to institute infraction proceedings where Water Framework Directive river quality standards are not met.

It is for the European Commission, in its role as guardian of the Treaties, to oversee the application of European Union law and institute infraction proceedings where it considers such action appropriate.

The standards which apply under the Water Framework Directive are set out in Directions from the Secretary of State to the Environment Agency. These standards are used by the Environment Agency in drawing up objectives for all water bodies in river basin management plans. These plans are then approved by the Secretary of State. All public bodies have a duty to have regard to these plans and the Environment Agency must exercise its functions to achieve the plans’ objectives.

9th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what guidance her Department provides on the level of phosphate discharge allowable from sewage treatment works under the Water Framework Directive; and what plans she has to review this guidance.

In July Defra published updated Ministerial guidance to the Environment Agency to assist it in carrying out its river basin planning functions under the Water Framework Directive. This includes guidance on environmental standards such as phosphates standards.

Current phosphate standards are set out in Directions to the Environment Agency and will apply to the end of the current six-year planning cycle in 2015.

Updated standards for phosphate will apply for the next six-year river basin planning cycle. This follows a review and consultation by the UK Water Framework Directive Technical Advisory Group. The new standards will be reflected in revised Directions to the Agency.

The Environment Agency sets limits on discharges from sewage treatment works to achieve standards set out in the Directions.

9th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what guidance her Department provides on the determination of allowable increases in phosphate pollution levels in English rivers.

In July Defra published updated Ministerial guidance to the Environment Agency to assist it in carrying out its river basin planning functions under the Water Framework Directive. This includes guidance on environmental standards such as phosphates standards.

Current phosphate standards are set out in Directions to the Environment Agency and will apply to the end of the current six-year planning cycle in 2015.

Updated standards for phosphate will apply for the next six-year river basin planning cycle. This follows a review and consultation by the UK Water Framework Directive Technical Advisory Group. The new standards will be reflected in revised Directions to the Agency.

These standards define the levels of phosphorus required in order to achieve good ecological status and are used by the Environment Agency in setting objectives for rivers.

9th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she has taken to ensure that the best available technology is used to reduce phosphate discharges into rivers at sewage treatment works in England.

The Environment Agency sets permit limits for sewage works discharges to meet the Environmental Quality Standards required by the Water Framework Directive, as set out in supporting Directions from the Secretary of State. This includes the standards for phosphorus.

There has been considerable investment by water companies in phosphorus removal across the country. In order to meet the new standards, water companies propose further programmes of innovation in their business plans for 2015 to 2020, to optimise the performance of these plants and also to trial novel techniques. This will inform their investment decisions on the appropriate technology to achieve the Environmental Quality Standards.

5th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when the levels of fines and sanctions for the illegal felling of trees were last reviewed and updated; and what steps her Department takes to ensure that fines and sanctions for the illegal felling of trees are kept up-to-date and are effective.

The fines and sanctions for the illegal felling of trees are laid out in the Forestry Act 1967 (as amended). The Criminal Justice Act 1982 made provision to increase the level of fine when it introduced the standard scale of fines for summary offences.

The Forestry Act 1967 was also amended by the Regulatory Reform (Forestry) Order 2006. This amendment now enables the Forestry Commissioners the option of serving a Restocking Notice on a person who appears to the Commissioners to have committed an offence of felling without a licence.

The Government’s regulation of the forestry sector was last reviewed in 2011 by the Forestry Regulations Task Force. The independently appointed Task Force made a comprehensive review of the regulations that protect and affect the management of woodland. The Government’s response to its recommendations can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-by-the-forestry-regulation-task-force-government-response

5th Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many trees have been illegally felled in England and Wales; how many restocking orders have been issued by the Forestry Commission or other relevant body; how many enforcement notices have subsequently been issued following restocking orders not being completed; and how many prosecutions have been taken forward by the Forestry Commission as a result of illegal felling of trees in each of the last 10 years.

The answer below is for England only. Forestry is a devolved matter and responsibility for and monitoring of illegal felling in Wales rests with the Welsh Assembly.

The Forestry Commission does not hold records for the number of trees which are illegally felled because it is the volume of licensable timber which is the key consideration in whether any action may be taken. In 2013/14 however, 99.91% of licensable tree felling was carried out with Forestry Commission approval. The other data requested is shown in the table.