Paul Blomfield Portrait

Paul Blomfield

Labour - Former Member for Sheffield Central

First elected: 6th May 2010

Left House: 30th May 2024 (Dissolution)


Health and Social Care Committee
13th Dec 2022 - 30th May 2024
Bishop's Stortford Cemetery Bill
10th Jan 2024 - 30th May 2024
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform Bill)
2nd Nov 2022 - 29th Nov 2022
Carer’s Leave Bill
2nd Nov 2022 - 9th Nov 2022
Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Bill
20th Jul 2022 - 7th Sep 2022
Nationality and Borders Bill
16th Sep 2021 - 4th Nov 2021
Shadow Minister (International Trade) (Brexit and EU Negotiations)
10th Apr 2020 - 30th Dec 2020
Shadow Minister (Cabinet Office) (Brexit and EU Negotiations)
10th Apr 2020 - 30th Dec 2020
Shadow Minister (Exiting the European Union)
9th Oct 2016 - 10th Apr 2020
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee
17th Oct 2016 - 31st Oct 2016
Education, Skills and the Economy Sub-Committee
1st Dec 2015 - 31st Oct 2016
Business and Trade Committee
17th Oct 2016 - 31st Oct 2016
Business, Innovation and Skills Committee
8th Jul 2015 - 17th Oct 2016
Business, Innovation and Skills Committee
2nd Nov 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Able Marine Energy Park Development Consent Order 2014
17th Jun 2014 - 30th Oct 2014
Able Marine Energy Park Development Consent Order 2014
11th Jun 2014 - 30th Oct 2014


Division Voting information

Paul Blomfield has voted in 2484 divisions, and 7 times against the majority of their Party.

25 Jun 2018 - National Policy Statement: Airports - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 94 Labour No votes vs 119 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 119
20 Nov 2017 - Duties of Customs - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 28 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 311
18 Jul 2016 - UK's Nuclear Deterrent - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 48 Labour No votes vs 140 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 472 Noes - 117
11 Sep 2015 - Assisted Dying (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 73 Labour Aye votes vs 91 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 330
18 Jun 2015 - European Union Referendum Bill - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 195 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 514
15 Jun 2010 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 29 Labour No votes vs 83 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 331
15 Jun 2010 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Paul Blomfield voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 53 Labour Aye votes vs 57 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 263
View All Paul Blomfield Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
(51 debate interactions)
Tom Pursglove (Conservative)
(47 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Home Office
(320 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(136 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Higher Education and Research Act 2017
(34,937 words contributed)
Nationality and Borders Act 2022
(13,360 words contributed)
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
(11,172 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Paul Blomfield's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Paul Blomfield

23rd April 2024
Paul Blomfield signed this EDM on Tuesday 21st May 2024

Safety of electric powered vehicles and lithium-ion batteries

Tabled by: Yvonne Fovargue (Labour - Makerfield)
That this House notes with concern the rise of fires caused by lithium-ion batteries used to power e-bikes and e-scooters, which have quadrupled since 2020, resulting in 13 deaths, 200 serious injuries requiring hospital treatment and have resulted in homelessness and staggering financial loses; commends the important work of the …
9 signatures
(Most recent: 21 May 2024)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 3
Scottish National Party: 3
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Liberal Democrat: 1
Independent: 1
13th May 2024
Paul Blomfield signed this EDM on Tuesday 14th May 2024

Diagnosing Coeliac disease

Tabled by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South)
That this House recognises that coeliac disease is a serious autoimmune disease affecting 1 in 100 people; expresses concern that almost two-thirds of people with the condition, equating to almost half a million people in the UK remain undiagnosed, running the risk of long term complications; notes that the average …
26 signatures
(Most recent: 23 May 2024)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 7
Independent: 4
Scottish National Party: 4
Liberal Democrat: 3
Plaid Cymru: 3
Democratic Unionist Party: 2
Conservative: 1
Workers Party of Britain: 1
Green Party: 1
View All Paul Blomfield's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Paul Blomfield, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Paul Blomfield has not been granted any Urgent Questions

2 Adjournment Debates led by Paul Blomfield

Monday 21st March 2022
Wednesday 14th December 2011

1 Bill introduced by Paul Blomfield


The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to make provision for regulating high-cost credit arrangements and providers of such arrangements; to provide for controls on advertising, information and communications associated with such arrangements; to make measures to address the cost and affordability of such credit arrangements and their associated charges; to regulate matters concerning repayments under such arrangements; to make provision on advice and advice services in relation to debt arising from such arrangements; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading: House Of Commons
Friday 12th July 2013

Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
50 Other Department Questions
2nd Sep 2019
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what recent assessment she has made of the extent of enforcement of the provisions of the Equality Act 2010 on discrimination on the basis of disability.

I refer the Hon Member to the evidence given by the Government Equalities Office and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to the recent inquiry into Enforcing the Equality Act: the law and the role of the EHRC by the Women and Equalities Select Committee chaired by my Rt Hon Friend the Member for Basingstoke. The Select Committee recently published its report from the inquiry and the Government will be responding to that report shortly.

Written evidence to the inquiry by the Government can be found here http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/women-and-equalities-committee/enforcing-the-equality-act-the-law-and-the-role-of-the-equality-and-human-rights-commission/written/91826.html

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
26th Apr 2019
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, how many applications have been made to the EnAble Fund.

The Government Equalities Office launched the EnAble Fund in December 2018, providing grants to help cover disability-related expenses that candidates might face when seeking elected office. There have been around fifty applications to the fund since then.

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
5th Feb 2018
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what recent steps her Department has taken to tackle the bullying of LGBTQ children in schools.

The Government has sent a clear message to schools that bullying, for whatever reason, is unacceptable. It can have a devastating effect on individuals, blight their education and have serious consequences for their mental health.

All schools are legally required to have a behaviour policy with measures to prevent all forms of bullying among pupils. They have the freedom to develop their own anti-bullying strategies appropriate to their environment but are held to account via Ofsted

In September 2016, we announced a £3 million programme from 2016-2019 to prevent and address homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying in a sustainable way. This programme focuses on primary and secondary schools in England that currently have no or few effective measures in place.
Six grantees have been funded as part of the programme to deliver interventions in at least 200 schools each. The grantees are Barnardo’s, LGBT Consortium, Metro Charity, National Children’s Bureau, Proud Trust and Stonewall.

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
5th Feb 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of laws tackling sexual harassment in the workplace.

The Government is clear that unwanted conduct in the workplace that violates a person’s dignity or creates a hostile or degrading atmosphere is unacceptable. Legal protection from such harassment in the workplace exists through the Equality Act 2010, with more serious, criminal offences covered in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Sexual Offences Act 2003. We believe this legislation provides adequate protection for both men and women in the working environment; however, we will continue to keep the operation of the legislation under review, to ensure that it works as intended.

We also recognise that employers may try to get employees to sign away their rights in non-disclosure agreements. In fact the law makes any such agreement unenforceable, should an employee subsequently take action under the Equality Act or the criminal law.

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
6th Oct 2017
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, pursuant to the Answer of 9 September 2017 to Question 6824, when the Government Equalities Office next plans to update her on reports of discrimination against non-UK EU nationals seeking employment.

Government Equalities Office (GEO) officials have examined a number of advertisements and notices constituting alleged race or nationality discrimination which the hon. Member has brought to the Government’s attention.

The GEO has forwarded this material to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which has powers to enforce the Equality Act 2010 in cases where it suspects that unlawful discrimination may have occurred.

20th Jul 2017
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, whether she has received evidence of an increase in discrimination against non-UK EU nationals seeking employment because of uncertainty on the future status of such nationals in the UK; and if she will make a statement.

The United Kingdom has a proud record of promoting equality and some of the strongest laws in the world to prevent and tackle discrimination. We will continue to make sure that these rights are protected.

The Government Equalities Office (GEO) is aware of, and is looking into, the reports of discrimination against non-UK EU nationals seeking employment which the hon Member has recently forwarded to the Secretary of State for Exiting the EU. The GEO sponsors the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which has powers to enforce the Equality Act 2010 in cases where it suspects unlawful discrimination in employment may have occurred.

Anyone who believes that they have experienced unlawful discrimination when seeking employment or when receiving goods or services, should seek advice and support from the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service: http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1461.

Additionally, they can also contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service: https://www.equalityadvisoryservice.com.

13th Apr 2017
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, pursuant to the Answer of 7 March 2017 to Question 66217, on plain English, how the Government ensures that both public and private sector service providers fulfil their duties under the Equality Act 2010 on accommodating users who require content published in an easy-read format.

It is for each public authority and private sector service provider to ensure that it acts in compliance with the Equality Act 2010. For the public sector this includes fulfilling the public sector equality duty, which requires public sector bodies to have due regard to the need to:

a) Eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under this Act;

b) Advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it; and

c) Foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it

If individuals feel that they have experienced discrimination, for example through the failure to make reasonable adjustments such as provision of information in a specific format, they may bring an action themselves either through the courts or through the Employment Tribunal Service.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is an independent statutory body which has specific legislative powers to monitor and enforce the Equality Act 2010. For example, it can issue an unlawful act notice against an employer or service provider if it is satisfied that they have breached the Act; or assist an individual who is or may become party to legal proceedings where that individual alleges he or she is the victim of a breach of the Act.

1st Mar 2017
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what steps she is taking to encourage the provision of easy read versions of content published by (a) government departments and agencies, (b) utility companies, (c) banks and (d) other private sector service providers.

Public authorities must have due regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty, which ensures that equality issues are proactively considered with the intention of meeting the needs and encouraging greater participation in public life by those with protected characteristics (such as a disability).

Private sector organisations, including utility companies and banks, have a duty under the Equality Act 2010 to make reasonable adjustments so as to ensure that a person with disabilities is not put at a substantial disadvantage when accessing or using public services. This may include actions such as accommodating requests for communication to be conducted in a particular format.

Guidance is already available to service providers, including public sector bodies, on how to meet these duties and is available on the gov.uk website.

The Office for Disability Issues are currently reviewing and updating the guidance to all Government communicators on accessible formats, to help ensure that all Departments have the latest information to support their internal and external communications.

14th Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, whether part-time students applying for maintenance support from 2018-19 will continue to be eligible for benefits.

Eligibility criteria and specific rules of the scheme will be set out as part of the consultation.

14th Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, when his Department's consultation on a new system of maintenance support for higher education students wishing to study part-time from 2018-19 will be launched.

The consultation will be launched in the new year.

14th Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, with reference to paragraph 7.3 of the Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015, what the evidential basis is for the statement that 150,000 part-time students could benefit each year from a new system of maintenance support by 2020.

This will be a new product, which is likely to differ from previous packages for part time students. It is therefore difficult to accurately assess its potential impact at this stage. The figures given are an initial central estimate of the number of students who could benefit from the new scheme consisting of the current numbers of students together with an element of modest growth. We have announced we will consult on the detail of the package and this will enable respondents to submit evidence on the potential numbers of students benefiting from the proposals.

1st Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what provision the Government made in the conditions of the sale of Royal Mail for suitable local alternatives to be provided in the event that local sorting or collection offices were closed.

Decisions on whether to close and re-locate local collection offices have always been operational matters for Royal Mail. The Government played no role in such decisions prior to the sale of Royal Mail.

Regardless of ownership, Royal Mail, as the United Kingdom’s designated universal service provider, is required to provide a universal postal service that meets the minimum requirements as set out under the Postal Services Act 2011.

It is the responsibility of the postal regulator, Ofcom, to ensure that Royal Mail provides sufficient access points to meet its universal postal service obligations.

1st Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, whether the Government sought assurances from Royal Mail that local collection offices would not be closed after the sale of that company.

Decisions on whether to close and re-locate local collection offices have always been operational matters for Royal Mail. The Government played no role in such decisions prior to the sale of Royal Mail.

Regardless of ownership, Royal Mail, as the United Kingdom’s designated universal service provider, is required to provide a universal postal service that meets the minimum requirements as set out under the Postal Services Act 2011.

It is the responsibility of the postal regulator, Ofcom, to ensure that Royal Mail provides sufficient access points to meet its universal postal service obligations.

18th Nov 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, if she will re-introduce feed-in tariff preaccreditation for community renewable energy schemes.

The Government proposed changes to the feed-in tariff scheme (FITs) as part of the FIT review, on which we consulted widely between 27th August and 23rd October.


We are currently analysing feedback submitted during the consultation and intend to publish a Government response as soon as possible.


29th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the annual budget for the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate was in 2011-12.


The budget for the Employment Agency Standards inspectorate for 2011-12 was £776,643.

28th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment has been made of the effect of incorporating the function of the Pay and Work Rights Helpline into ACAS on outcomes for workers.

From 1 April 2015, the ACAS Helpline is, in addition to its usual services, answering queries previously handled by the Pay and Work rights Helpline. This provides a one stop shop for those seeking advice and guidance on employment rights. Where appropriate, ACAS passes on callers through a real time transfer of the call to the relevant enforcement body for them to take any further follow up action, including any specific complaints.

No formal assessment has been made at this time of the outcomes for workers. ACAS continues to work closely with the four enforcement bodies to ensure the service is bedding in effectively and delivering the right outcomes for the public.

28th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, with reference to paragraph 62 of the Government's consultation document, Tackling Exploitation in the Labour Market, published in October 2015, what limitations currently exist on data sharing between labour market enforcement bodies.


While information is already shared between labour market enforcement bodies, the existing information sharing gateways in numerous Acts of Parliament are limited as regards with whom information can be shared and for what purpose. Legislative changes may be required to allow greater information sharing between enforcement bodies. For example we want to ensure that HMRC National Minimum Wage enforcement officers are able to share information effectively with the Health and Safety Executive and local authorities.


We are also engaging with the relevant enforcement bodies to identify possible non-legislative barriers to information sharing.

15th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the reasons are for his proposal to exclude taught masters students who are over the age of 30 from the new postgraduate loans scheme proposed for England.

A consultation on the proposed postgraduate Master’s loan scheme was held earlier in the year. The consultation covered proposed terms and conditions, including an age eligibility criterion and the eligibility of distance learning. Consultation responses are currently being analysed and the Department will respond in the autumn.

15th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the reasons are for the proposed exclusion from the new postgraduate loans scheme proposed for England of taught masters students who are studying via distance learning at a minimum of 50 per cent intensity.

A consultation on the proposed postgraduate Master’s loan scheme was held earlier in the year. The consultation covered proposed terms and conditions, including an age eligibility criterion and the eligibility of distance learning. Consultation responses are currently being analysed and the Department will respond in the autumn.

15th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the reasons are for the proposal to include in the new postgraduate loans scheme proposed for England part-time taught masters students studying at a minimum of 50 per cent intensity not via distance learning.

A consultation on the proposed postgraduate Master’s loan scheme was held earlier in the year. The consultation covered proposed terms and conditions, including an age eligibility criterion and the eligibility of distance learning. Consultation responses are currently being analysed and the Department will respond in the autumn.

9th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, when he expects to respond to the consultation on postgraduate study, student loans and other support.

The consultation response is currently being analysed and the Department expects to respond in the Autumn.

16th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 10 September 2015 to Question 8779, whether the range of information sources HM Revenue and Customs uses to monitor the reported self-correction by employers participating in the new national minimum wage campaign includes speaking independently to the workforce and other relevant groups such as local trade unions.

HMRC operate a risk based approach using a range of sources to monitor self-corrections in the national minimum wage campaign, this ‎includes contacting workers to ensure they have received the reported arrears.

15th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer to Question 8779 of 10 September 2015, how many employers have participated in HM Revenue and Custom's new national minimum wage campaign to date.

The National Minimum Wage campaign launched on 29 July 2015. Information on the number of employers, workers covered and total arrears identified through the campaign will be made available when details for each voluntary disclosure have been finalised.

11th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the effects of the Deduction From Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 on employment law claims made by victims of modern slavery.

The Department published an assessment of the impact of the Regulations on employers and workers in December 2014. This can be found at this link

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/3322/impacts

10th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the membership of the UKTI's Strategic Relations Team is; and which companies are involved with that team.

The UKTI Strategic Relationship Management Team is made up of a mixture of Civil Servants and Private Sector staff, managing around 80 companies. The companies are listed in the table.

3M

Diageo

Iberdrola

Pfizer

ABB

Disney

IBM

Prudential

ABF

DP World

Imagination Technologies

Roche

Aon

E.ON

INEOS

Rolls Royce

ARM

EADS Airbus

Jaguar Land Rover

RWE

AstraZeneca

EDF

JCB

SABIC

Atkins

EE

Johnson & Johnson

Samsung

Aviva

Eisai

Johnson Matthey

Shell

Babcock

Engie (GDF Suez)

Lockheed Martin

Siemens

BAE Systems

Facebook

Microsoft

SSE

Balfour Beatty

Ford

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Statoil

BASF

GE

Mitubishi Corporation

Syngenta

BG Group

GKN

Mondeléz International

Tata Group

BMW

GlaxoSmithKline

National Grid

Telefonica

Bombardier

GM

Nestlé

Time Warner

BP

Google

Nissan

Toshiba

BT

Hitachi

Novartis

Toyota

Caterpillar

Honda

P&G

Unilever

Centrica

HP

PCCW

Vodafone

Cisco

Huawei

Pearson

Coca-cola

Hutchison Whampoa

PepsiCo

4th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 13 July 2015 to Question 6582, how much of the £1,347,150 arrears of pay has been returned to the affected workers.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer provided by my hon. Friend the Treasury Minister (David Gauke) on 3 November 2014, Question 211605.

Where consistent with our naming policy the Government has made public the names of employers who have failed to pay their employees the National Minimum Wage, including the value of the arrears. Details of the most recent naming and shaming announcement in July 2015 are available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-minimum-wage-offenders-named-and-shamed.

4th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 13 July 2015 to Question 6582, how much of the £158,239 in financial penalty was issued to each care provider; and how much each such care provider owed in arrears to its workers at the time of the issuing of the penalty.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer provided by my hon. Friend the Treasury Minister (David Gauke) on 3 November 2014, Question 211605.

Where consistent with our naming policy the Government has made public the names of employers who have failed to pay their employees the National Minimum Wage, including the value of the arrears. Details of the most recent naming and shaming announcement in July 2015 are available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-minimum-wage-offenders-named-and-shamed.

4th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what value of penalties has been issued to each employer found to be non-compliant with National Minimum Wage legislation since 7 March 2014; and what amount of arrears each such employer owed.

Since 7 March 2014, the Government has recovered arrears of almost £5.9 million and issued penalties of almost £1.4m. Where consistent with our naming policy the Government has made public the names of employers who have failed to pay their employees the National Minimum Wage, including the value of the arrears. Details of the latest naming and shaming announcement are available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-minimum-wage-offenders-named-and-shamed

Evidence from other HMRC campaigns suggests those who voluntarily change behaviour can remain compliant for longer. Under the operation of the NMW Campaign launched in July, employers who are in breach of NMW regulations must formally notify HMRC of their participation in the campaign and then complete a full disclosure within two months. Employers must declare details of the arrears to allow HMRC to check and accept that pay has been corrected. HMRC is using a range of information sources to monitor whether the reported self-correction matches the details submitted by the employer. Where appropriate, HMRC will investigate and challenge employer action.

4th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the evidential basis is for allowing employers to self-correct without investigation by HM Revenue and Customs under the National Minimum Wage campaign launched in July 2015.

Since 7 March 2014, the Government has recovered arrears of almost £5.9 million and issued penalties of almost £1.4m. Where consistent with our naming policy the Government has made public the names of employers who have failed to pay their employees the National Minimum Wage, including the value of the arrears. Details of the latest naming and shaming announcement are available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-minimum-wage-offenders-named-and-shamed

Evidence from other HMRC campaigns suggests those who voluntarily change behaviour can remain compliant for longer. Under the operation of the NMW Campaign launched in July, employers who are in breach of NMW regulations must formally notify HMRC of their participation in the campaign and then complete a full disclosure within two months. Employers must declare details of the arrears to allow HMRC to check and accept that pay has been corrected. HMRC is using a range of information sources to monitor whether the reported self-correction matches the details submitted by the employer. Where appropriate, HMRC will investigate and challenge employer action.

4th Sep 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how HM Revenue and Customs plans to ensure that employers who self-report non-payment of the National Minimum Wage under the campaign launched in July 2015 (a) have paid arrears owed to staff and (b) pay the National Minimum Wage in future.

Since 7 March 2014, the Government has recovered arrears of almost £5.9 million and issued penalties of almost £1.4m. Where consistent with our naming policy the Government has made public the names of employers who have failed to pay their employees the National Minimum Wage, including the value of the arrears. Details of the latest naming and shaming announcement are available here - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-minimum-wage-offenders-named-and-shamed

Evidence from other HMRC campaigns suggests those who voluntarily change behaviour can remain compliant for longer. Under the operation of the NMW Campaign launched in July, employers who are in breach of NMW regulations must formally notify HMRC of their participation in the campaign and then complete a full disclosure within two months. Employers must declare details of the arrears to allow HMRC to check and accept that pay has been corrected. HMRC is using a range of information sources to monitor whether the reported self-correction matches the details submitted by the employer. Where appropriate, HMRC will investigate and challenge employer action.

13th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, if he will meet the Minister of State for Care and Support to discuss enforcement of the minimum wage in the care sector.

I have recently met with my Rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Care and Support (Alistair Burt) to discuss enforcement of the minimum wage in the care sector.

The Government is taking action to improve compliance with the National Minimum Wage in the social care sector. We are working closely with the Department of Health, and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Over the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2013, HMRC have made enquiries into 224 employers in the social care sector. Over half of these were paying less than the minimum wage- between them owing £1,347,150 arrears of pay to 6959 workers, with penalties issued with a total value of £158,239.

HMRC also opened 225 investigations in the period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015. 113 cases are closed with £110,943 arrears identified for 368 workers. Currently, there are 142 investigations open in social care.

The Department of Health has published statutory guidance for local authorities as part of the package of secondary legislation to accompany the Care Act. The chapter of statutory guidance on commissioning and market shaping explicitly states that local authorities should have evidence that contract terms, conditions and fee levels will not compromise care providers’ ability to pay at least minimum wages.

The Department of Health is asking all Local Authorities to sign up to the Social Care Commitment which incorporates a statement about employer compliance with minimum wage legislation. The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services has written out to all its members encouraging them to support the Commitment as a way of raising standards in adult social care.

The Department of Health is also working with the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS), the Local Government Association (LGA) and the Health Services Management Centre at Birmingham University to develop a set of Commissioning Standards. Local authorities will be encouraged to use these as a benchmark to support them to improve commissioning practices, including those which have an impact on the social care workforce such as employer compliance with National Minimum Wage.

In addition to the actions we are currently taking to reduce non-compliance in the social care sector, we will also be:

· issuing guidance to employers so that they understand the NMW law, including tips to avoid common mistakes and the records that they should be keeping to prove that they are paying their workers correctly.

· encouraging care sector workers who have been underpaid to make a complaint- making sure that they understand their entitlement.

Any worker who is concerned that they have not received what they are entitled to should call the Acas helpline on 0300 123 1100 for confidential advice. HMRC follow up every complaint.

8th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many permanent members of staff are employed by the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate; and what changes are planned to the level of staffing in that inspectorate in the next 12 months.

There are currently nine Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate permanent warranted officers, who are supported by one administrative officer.

There are no current plans to change staffing levels but they will be considered in the context of the Prime Minister’s announcement on 21st May 2015 that the Government will create a new labour market enforcement agency.

22nd Jun 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what his policy is on maintaining the student opportunity allocation in its current form.

Widening participation in higher education remains a priority for this Government. The Prime Minister has committed to doubling the proportion of people from disadvantaged backgrounds entering higher education by the end of this Parliament from 2009 levels.

We are reviewing all areas of the Department’s expenditure as part of our preparations for the spending review and no decisions have yet been taken on any funding streams beyond 2015-16.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 18 March 2015 to Question 228233, how the increased resources for the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate in this financial year have been allocated.

All of the increased resources in the Employment Agency Standards (EAS) Inspectorate have been allocated to front line posts

We have recruited two additional EAS Inspectors and an Operations and Prosecutions Manager, all of whom carry warrant cards and carry out both complaint investigation and targeted enforcement operations in high risk areas.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 18 March 2015 to Question 228233, which potential breaches of the (a) Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 and (b) Employment Agencies Act 1973 were identified in the inspections of employment businesses conducted by the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate in February 2015.

Across the agencies visited in Sheffield in February, the following potential breaches of the Conduct Regulations were found:

Regulation 5 – Cannot make the provision of work-finding conditionally upon buying goods or services supplied by the agency

Regulation 10 – Transfer fees for a temporary worker moving to a permanent position with a hirer or third party

Regulation 13 – Information to be given in writing about goods or services provided by the agency

Regulation 14 – Terms to be agreed with a work-seeker

Regulation 15 – Specific information to be contained in the terms agreed under Regulation 14

Regulation 17 – Terms to be agreed with the hirer

Regulation 18 – Information to be obtained from the hirer in relation to the work to be undertaken

Regulation 19 – Confirmation to be obtained about a work seeker

Regulation 21 – Confirmation of information to be passed to both the work-seeker and hirer about each other

Regulation 24 – Covers where a work seeker is required to travel and/or live away from home to undertake an assignment, and loans

Regulation 28 – Confidentiality and use of the information provided to the agency by the work-seeker

Regulation 29 – Maintenance of records to show compliance with these Regulations

Regulation 32 – Changes that need to be made to terms to reflect the fact that the work-seeker is incorporated

There was also one potential instance of charging for work finding services which is a breach of Section 6 (1) of the Employment Agencies Act 1973.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 18 March 2015 to Question 228233 and the Written Statement of 4 November 2013, Official Report, 1WS, if he will ensure that staff seconded from the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate (EAS) to HM Revenue and Customs will be returned to EAS.

The resources in EAS have doubled this year and will increase again in the next financial year. Since November 2014, three staff who were on loan to HMRC have returned to EAS.

We are currently undertaking a recruitment exercise to further increase EAS resources and the remaining EAS staff on loan may apply to return if they choose.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 18 March 2015 to Question 228233, what the most common breaches of obligations under the (a) Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 and (b) Employment Agencies Act 1973 identified by the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate are.

The most common breaches of the obligations under the Conduct Regulations are:

Regulation 12 - Withholding payment for work undertaken

Regulation 13 – Information to be given in writing about goods or services provided by the agency

Regulation 14 – Terms to be agreed with a work-seeker

Regulation 15 – Specific information to be contained in the terms agreed under Regulation 14

The most common breach of the obligations under the Employment Agencies Act is charging for work finding services which is a breach of Section 6 (1) of the Employment Agencies Act 1973.

23rd Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 18 March 2015 to Question 228233, what additional staffing the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate has allocated to conduct targeted enforcement action in high risk areas.

The resources in Employment Agency Standards (EAS) have doubled this year and will increase again in the next financial year.

All of the staff in the EAS Inspectorate carry out both complaint investigation and targeted enforcement operations in high risk areas.

18th Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, whether he plans to increase the resources and staffing available to the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate; and if he will make a statement.

The Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate (EAS) enforce the Employment Agencies Act 1973 and the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 (both as amended).

We have doubled EAS resource this financial year and will increase resource again for the financial year 2015/16. This additional resource is being used for targeted enforcement in high risk areas in order to protect the most vulnerable agency workers.

In February, EAS inspectors led a targeted enforcement operation in the Sheffield area. They were accompanied by officers from Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC’s) National Minimum Wage (NMW) team and, on some visits, by the Pensions Regulator.

During the inspections of 15 employment businesses, EAS identified 32 potential breaches of the Conduct Regulations, as well as a potential breach of the Employment Agencies Act. Where breaches were identified, warning letters were issued and the agencies were required to change practices and demonstrate compliance or face further enforcement action.

15th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2014 to Question 217684, how many employers have been fined for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage at the rate introduced in March 2014.

The Notice of Underpayment issued to an employer by HMRC following the identification of underpayments of the National Minimum Wage does not differentiate between underpayments to workers and apprentices. Non-compliance involving apprentices is not restricted to the Apprentice National Minimum Wage; some non-compliance will occur where an apprentice is entitled to the relevant age rate (where they are aged over 19 and have completed their first year).

It is therefore not possible to provide information on the number of employers who have faced a penalty for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage since March 2014, as HMRC do not hold this information. Nor is it possible to provide details of the number of naming cases involving underpayments to apprentices. We can confirm that every employer that has been named has faced a financial penalty. These penalties will have related to pay reference periods falling before and after 7 March 2014 and so will have been calculated at the previous and current rates.

In 2014/15, the National Minimum Wage enforcement budget was increased by £1.2m from £8m to £9.2m. There are currently 189 staff across HMRC contributing to enforcing NMW, including people who work in legal advice, debt management, technical support and criminal investigation, amongst others. This includes an additional 26 inspectors recently recruited following the in-year 14/15 funding increase. Within this overall resource, we do not specify an amount that should be allocated to enforcing the apprentice National Minimum Wage. HMRC are required to respond to every complaint made to the Pay and Work Rights Helpline. In addition to this, complaints from apprentices are prioritised and fast-tracked.

Anyone who is concerned that they have been underpaid the National Minimum Wage should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline for free and confidential advice on 0800 917 2368.

15th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2014 to Question 217684, how many of the 55 companies named for non-payment of the National Minimum Wage had underpaid apprentices; and how many of those 55 companies have been fined for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage.

The Notice of Underpayment issued to an employer by HMRC following the identification of underpayments of the National Minimum Wage does not differentiate between underpayments to workers and apprentices. Non-compliance involving apprentices is not restricted to the Apprentice National Minimum Wage; some non-compliance will occur where an apprentice is entitled to the relevant age rate (where they are aged over 19 and have completed their first year).

It is therefore not possible to provide information on the number of employers who have faced a penalty for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage since March 2014, as HMRC do not hold this information. Nor is it possible to provide details of the number of naming cases involving underpayments to apprentices. We can confirm that every employer that has been named has faced a financial penalty. These penalties will have related to pay reference periods falling before and after 7 March 2014 and so will have been calculated at the previous and current rates.

In 2014/15, the National Minimum Wage enforcement budget was increased by £1.2m from £8m to £9.2m. There are currently 189 staff across HMRC contributing to enforcing NMW, including people who work in legal advice, debt management, technical support and criminal investigation, amongst others. This includes an additional 26 inspectors recently recruited following the in-year 14/15 funding increase. Within this overall resource, we do not specify an amount that should be allocated to enforcing the apprentice National Minimum Wage. HMRC are required to respond to every complaint made to the Pay and Work Rights Helpline. In addition to this, complaints from apprentices are prioritised and fast-tracked.

Anyone who is concerned that they have been underpaid the National Minimum Wage should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline for free and confidential advice on 0800 917 2368.

15th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2014 to Question 217684, what (a) funding and (b) staffing has been allocated to enforcement of the apprentice National Minimum Wage.

The Notice of Underpayment issued to an employer by HMRC following the identification of underpayments of the National Minimum Wage does not differentiate between underpayments to workers and apprentices. Non-compliance involving apprentices is not restricted to the Apprentice National Minimum Wage; some non-compliance will occur where an apprentice is entitled to the relevant age rate (where they are aged over 19 and have completed their first year).

It is therefore not possible to provide information on the number of employers who have faced a penalty for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage since March 2014, as HMRC do not hold this information. Nor is it possible to provide details of the number of naming cases involving underpayments to apprentices. We can confirm that every employer that has been named has faced a financial penalty. These penalties will have related to pay reference periods falling before and after 7 March 2014 and so will have been calculated at the previous and current rates.

In 2014/15, the National Minimum Wage enforcement budget was increased by £1.2m from £8m to £9.2m. There are currently 189 staff across HMRC contributing to enforcing NMW, including people who work in legal advice, debt management, technical support and criminal investigation, amongst others. This includes an additional 26 inspectors recently recruited following the in-year 14/15 funding increase. Within this overall resource, we do not specify an amount that should be allocated to enforcing the apprentice National Minimum Wage. HMRC are required to respond to every complaint made to the Pay and Work Rights Helpline. In addition to this, complaints from apprentices are prioritised and fast-tracked.

Anyone who is concerned that they have been underpaid the National Minimum Wage should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline for free and confidential advice on 0800 917 2368.

15th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2014 to Question 217744, when his Department plans to write to level 2 and 3 apprenticeships in England informing them of their National Minimum Wage entitlement.

A letter is issued to all new level 2 and 3 apprentices in England on Government-funded apprenticeships, setting out what they can expect from their apprenticeship. This includes information on their national minimum wage entitlement.

8th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what plans he has to improve apprentice National Minimum Wage enforcement.

The Government is committed to the National Minimum Wage and is absolutely clear that everyone who is entitled to it should receive it. Any worker who thinks they have been underpaid should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline on 0800 917 2368. HMRC investigates every complaint made to the helpline and calls from apprentices are prioritised for consideration.

The Government is aware that non-compliance involving apprentices is an issue and we are taking action. We are:

· Ensuring that all training providers [in England] deliver on existing obligations to inform employers and apprentices of their NMW requirements.

· Improving guidance and information more generally, to ensure we have clear and comprehensive information on the minimum wage rules. In England the National Apprenticeship Service includes information on the NMW in its information pack for employers taking on an apprentice.

· Encouraging workers to call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline if they think they are not getting what they are legally entitled to through our communication campaign which began in Sept 2014.

· Writing to level 2 & 3 apprentices in England informing them of their NMW entitlement.

We have also asked the Low Pay Commission (LPC) to consider whether we can simplify the apprentice rate structure so that it is as clear and simple as possible, in order to support those employers who take on apprentices. The LPC will report back with their recommendations in February 2015.

We are continuing to take a tough approach towards all employers that do not comply with the National Minimum Wage (NMW) law, including through making their non-compliance public. 55 employers, including some who underpaid apprentices, have been named so far and between them they owed workers a total of over £139,000 in arrears.

The Government has also increased the financial penalty percentage that employers pay for breaking minimum wage law from 50 per cent to 100 per cent of the unpaid arrears owed to workers and the maximum penalty from £5,000 to £20,000. This came into effect on 7 March 2014. We are introducing primary legislation so that the penalty can be calculated on a per worker basis which will substantially increase the penalty for some employers.


There have been no prosecutions since 2010 involving apprentices. Prosecution is reserved for the most serious cases. The Government usually pursues other means, which are more effective, to achieve the key goals of getting workers paid their arrears of wages and deter employers from being non-compliant. For example, the Government policy on the naming scheme and the increase in the NMW civil penalty will have considerable reputational and financial consequences for employers who are non-compliant with the NMW. However, HMRC will refer suitable cases to prosecutors.

8th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many employers have been prosecuted for non-payment of the apprentice National Minimum Wage in each year since 2010.

The Government is committed to the National Minimum Wage and is absolutely clear that everyone who is entitled to it should receive it. Any worker who thinks they have been underpaid should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline on 0800 917 2368. HMRC investigates every complaint made to the helpline and calls from apprentices are prioritised for consideration.

The Government is aware that non-compliance involving apprentices is an issue and we are taking action. We are:

· Ensuring that all training providers [in England] deliver on existing obligations to inform employers and apprentices of their NMW requirements.

· Improving guidance and information more generally, to ensure we have clear and comprehensive information on the minimum wage rules. In England the National Apprenticeship Service includes information on the NMW in its information pack for employers taking on an apprentice.

· Encouraging workers to call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline if they think they are not getting what they are legally entitled to through our communication campaign which began in Sept 2014.

· Writing to level 2 & 3 apprentices in England informing them of their NMW entitlement.

We have also asked the Low Pay Commission (LPC) to consider whether we can simplify the apprentice rate structure so that it is as clear and simple as possible, in order to support those employers who take on apprentices. The LPC will report back with their recommendations in February 2015.

We are continuing to take a tough approach towards all employers that do not comply with the National Minimum Wage (NMW) law, including through making their non-compliance public. 55 employers, including some who underpaid apprentices, have been named so far and between them they owed workers a total of over £139,000 in arrears.

The Government has also increased the financial penalty percentage that employers pay for breaking minimum wage law from 50 per cent to 100 per cent of the unpaid arrears owed to workers and the maximum penalty from £5,000 to £20,000. This came into effect on 7 March 2014. We are introducing primary legislation so that the penalty can be calculated on a per worker basis which will substantially increase the penalty for some employers.


There have been no prosecutions since 2010 involving apprentices. Prosecution is reserved for the most serious cases. The Government usually pursues other means, which are more effective, to achieve the key goals of getting workers paid their arrears of wages and deter employers from being non-compliant. For example, the Government policy on the naming scheme and the increase in the NMW civil penalty will have considerable reputational and financial consequences for employers who are non-compliant with the NMW. However, HMRC will refer suitable cases to prosecutors.

8th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, with reference to page 5 of his Department's publication, National Minimum Wage, Interim government evidence for the 2015 Low Pay Commission report, published in October 2014, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the rate of non-compliance with the National Minimum Wage (NMW) for apprentices; and what steps he plans to take to increase the rate of compliance with the apprentice NMW.

The Government is committed to the National Minimum Wage and is absolutely clear that everyone who is entitled to it should receive it. Any worker who thinks they have been underpaid should call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline on 0800 917 2368. HMRC investigates every complaint made to the helpline and calls from apprentices are prioritised for consideration.

The Government is aware that non-compliance involving apprentices is an issue and we are taking action. We are:

· Ensuring that all training providers [in England] deliver on existing obligations to inform employers and apprentices of their NMW requirements.

· Improving guidance and information more generally, to ensure we have clear and comprehensive information on the minimum wage rules. In England the National Apprenticeship Service includes information on the NMW in its information pack for employers taking on an apprentice.

· Encouraging workers to call the Pay and Work Rights Helpline if they think they are not getting what they are legally entitled to through our communication campaign which began in Sept 2014.

· Writing to level 2 & 3 apprentices in England informing them of their NMW entitlement.

We have also asked the Low Pay Commission (LPC) to consider whether we can simplify the apprentice rate structure so that it is as clear and simple as possible, in order to support those employers who take on apprentices. The LPC will report back with their recommendations in February 2015.

We are continuing to take a tough approach towards all employers that do not comply with the National Minimum Wage (NMW) law, including through making their non-compliance public. 55 employers, including some who underpaid apprentices, have been named so far and between them they owed workers a total of over £139,000 in arrears.

The Government has also increased the financial penalty percentage that employers pay for breaking minimum wage law from 50 per cent to 100 per cent of the unpaid arrears owed to workers and the maximum penalty from £5,000 to £20,000. This came into effect on 7 March 2014. We are introducing primary legislation so that the penalty can be calculated on a per worker basis which will substantially increase the penalty for some employers.


There have been no prosecutions since 2010 involving apprentices. Prosecution is reserved for the most serious cases. The Government usually pursues other means, which are more effective, to achieve the key goals of getting workers paid their arrears of wages and deter employers from being non-compliant. For example, the Government policy on the naming scheme and the increase in the NMW civil penalty will have considerable reputational and financial consequences for employers who are non-compliant with the NMW. However, HMRC will refer suitable cases to prosecutors.

4th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, with reference to Annex 1 of his Department's grant letter to the Higher Education Funding Council for England for 2014-15, whether he plans to amend funding priorities for social mobility in higher education for 2015-16.

The Government will set out our priorities for higher education for 2015-16 in the annual Grant Letter to the Funding Council.

25th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, whether the Student Opportunity Allocation for 2015-16 will be maintained at the same level as in 2014-15.

The proportion of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds entering higher education this year is at record levels.

Widening participation in higher education remains a priority for this Government. We will announce the funding we will make available for higher education in 2015/16, in the usual way in our grant letter to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), which is due for publication in early 2015. HEFCE is responsible for deciding the detail of allocations to institutions.

25th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what his policy is on equality of access to postgraduate funding for full-time and part-time students.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) provides funding to higher education institutions (HEI) for postgraduate study: £240m to support the costs of postgraduate research supervision; and £120m to contribute to the costs of providing postgraduate taught programmes. Postgraduate taught funding is based on a calculation of full-time and part-time student numbers.

HEFCE allocations to HEIs are subject to the conditions of the grant set out in its Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability, which requires that HEIs should, as a minimum, comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010. HEFCE monitors HEIs’ progress with regard to equality and diversity.

Research Council funding for postgraduate research training is through research organisations, who undertake the selection and recruitment of students. The Research Council UK (RCUK) terms and conditions for training grants require that research organisations should meet the RCUK Expectations for Equality and Diversity in all aspects of the recruitment and career management of students. Students may be full-time or part-time.

Research Councils collect and analyse data on the gender, ethnic origin and age of supported students to monitor the effectiveness of their policies and initiatives.