Mentions:
1: Lord Foster of Bath (LD - Life peer) very little action in respect of gambling advertising.The Gambling Act 2005 liberalised gambling advertising - Speech Link
2: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) on the other.That is why, as part of our review of the Gambling Act 2005, we took an exhaustive look - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Jim Shannon (DUP - Strangford) Individuals must be aware of their gambling habits and the potential dangers that come along with gambling - Speech Link
2: Ronnie Cowan (SNP - Inverclyde) We know plenty of gambling products that are already doing that. - Speech Link
3: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) Questions remain about why the commission failed to act sooner, thereby potentially mitigating some of - Speech Link
4: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) under the Gambling Act 2005. - Speech Link
5: Barbara Keeley (Lab - Worsley and Eccles South) As for the commission posing the question of KiX, “Is it gambling?” - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab - Life peer) I am not a gambling man. It is an interesting term. - Speech Link
2: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) fact that political parties cannot avail themselves of the soft opt-in provision have been there since 2005 - Speech Link
3: Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) This is in sharp contrast to the Investigatory Powers Act, where key excerpts were made available in - Speech Link
4: Baroness Sherlock (Lab - Life peer) Is there any time limit on how long DWP has to act on the results that have been handed over to it? - Speech Link
5: None I looked up the 1992 Act, which referred to benefits covered by a list of 13 other Acts. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Ronnie Cowan (SNP - Inverclyde) According to the ASA, that was a predicted consequence of the Gambling Act 2005. - Speech Link
2: Gavin Newlands (SNP - Paisley and Renfrewshire North) In our view, the 2005 Act must be modernised and made effective for the digital age, to provide adequate - Speech Link
3: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) 2005, and we have undoubtedly witnessed the continual growth of gambling marketing since then. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Christina Rees (LAB - Neath) I will do my best to present those to the Chamber today.For context, the Gambling Act 2005 regulates - Speech Link
2: Carolyn Harris (Lab - Swansea East) have a duty to act responsibly and protect them from harm. - Speech Link
3: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) were updated was back in 2005. - Speech Link
4: Stuart Andrew (Con - Pudsey) Throughout the pilot, gambling businesses will not be expected to act on the data they receive, although - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Chris Philp (Con - Croydon South) It also amends part 3 of the Drugs Act 2005 to provide the police with a power to require people who - Speech Link
2: Alex Norris (LAB - Nottingham North) Currently, under the Drugs Act 2005, an individual who tests positive for a class A drug may be required - Speech Link
3: None The amendment would go further than the Drugs Act 2005 by making it an obligation to refer. - Speech Link
4: None This amendment applies Part 3 of the Drugs Act 2005 (assessment of misuse of drugs) where controlled - Speech Link
5: None This amendment makes provision equivalent to section 11 of the Drugs Act 2005 for certain cases where - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord West of Spithead (Lab - Life peer) , the Telecommunications (Security) Act and the National Security Act. - Speech Link
2: Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Lab - Life peer) In 2005, when I became the chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee, nearly two decades had passed - Speech Link
3: Lord Fox (LD - Life peer) authorities—councils, police forces, intelligence agencies, government departments including the DWP and HMRC, the Gambling - Speech Link
4: None The Intelligence Services Act and the Security Service Act specify economic well-being as a basis for - Speech Link
5: None The 2016 Act essentially ushered in that role. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Roger Gale (Con - North Thanet) Act 2005, and “lottery ticket” has the meaning given by section 253 of that Act.”This amendment seeks - Speech Link
2: Kevin Hollinrake (Con - Thirsk and Malton) under gambling laws, are excluded from the scope of the subscription contract measures. - Speech Link
3: None This amendment excludes contracts for gambling (that are regulated by other legislation) from the new - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab - Life peer) When can we expect to see any gambling legislation to bring in effective regulation of online gambling - Speech Link
2: Lord Butler of Brockwell (XB - Life peer) Act 2005 would be reviewed, with“a particular focus on tackling issues around loot boxes”.It therefore - Speech Link
3: Lord Foster of Bath (LD - Life peer) Our research shows that increased exposure to gambling can influence attitudes towards gambling and the - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Matt Hancock (Ind - West Suffolk) The Minister can already act on this by simply setting out that the current way that the affordability - Speech Link
2: Jerome Mayhew (Con - Broadland) The Gambling Act review is causing Fakenham huge concern. - Speech Link
3: Gavin Newlands (SNP - Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Thankfully, the Gambling Act will be modernised and made more effective for the digital age by providing - Speech Link
4: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley East) Indeed, the last Gambling Act was introduced back in 2005, long before the huge growth in online and - Speech Link