Mentions:
1: Alison Thewliss (SNP - Glasgow Central) harm in scrutinising it. - Speech Link
2: None The harm that that could cause is really quite significant. - Speech Link
3: Diana Johnson (Lab - Kingston upon Hull North) What we do know is that £370 million is already committed to the Rwanda scheme, no individuals have yet - Speech Link
4: Robert Buckland (Con - South Swindon) It seems to me that any harm that might be judged to have been caused is clearly revocable in the form - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Carlile of Berriew (XB - Life peer) and did not do it after that—but there was no doubt that, when instructions were presented to me as - Speech Link
2: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer) At first glance, the Bill does seem fairly simple. - Speech Link
3: Lord Sandhurst (Con - Excepted Hereditary) The sense of individuals that we live in a society in which harm done falls to be recompensed, or that - Speech Link
4: Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (LD - Life peer) I do not share the pessimism of the noble Lord, Lord Trevethin and Oaksey, that there is no future for - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) their departmental officials will have the specialist knowledge to assess whether there is a risk of harm - Speech Link
2: Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Con - Life peer) This is my first visit to this Committee to speak. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) What route do the Government advise Ofcom to take to mitigate identified risks for which there are no - Speech Link
4: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) need to amend the legislation, but, if there is no need to do so, I hope that they revise the guidance - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) so before the harm is already incurred. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Con - Life peer) irreparable harm to children. - Speech Link
3: Lord Clement-Jones (LD - Life peer) It puts the onus on them to ensure safety and prevent harm, rather than waiting for harm to occur and - Speech Link
4: Lord Kamall (Con - Life peer) I asked why I was denied, having been let into the gate area in the first place, but no one could explain - Speech Link
5: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) No, I do not accept that at all. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Stunell (LD - Life peer) 250 years substantially in the direction of providing better protection for the weak and minimising harm - Speech Link
2: Lord Moylan (Con - Life peer) There is no justification for them to do that. - Speech Link
3: Lord Adonis (Lab - Life peer) What the consultation does not have is an option of no reform of ground rents.So my first question to - Speech Link
4: Viscount Hanworth (Lab - Excepted Hereditary) This is not difficult to do in an era of no-fault evictions. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Paul Bristow (Con - Peterborough) It is a blight that not only tarnishes the beauty of our landscapes but inflicts profound harm on local - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Roger Gale (Con - North Thanet) regulations may be exercised so as to protect children, and vulnerable individuals who are 18 or over, from harm - Speech Link
2: Christopher Chope (Con - Christchurch) tighten up the pedicab regime.My first amendment“requires Transport for London to have regard to any - Speech Link
3: Guy Opperman (Con - Hexham) I am not able to do that at this stage, and I do not feel that this Bill is the right venue to do it. - Speech Link
4: Florence Eshalomi (LAB - Vauxhall) Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Nickie Aiken), on first introducing the Bill. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Iain Stewart (Con - Milton Keynes South) major infrastructure schemes that increase emissions where that increase is judged as not likely to harm - Speech Link
2: Caroline Lucas (Green - Brighton, Pavilion) The first priority of the transport decarbonisation plan is modal shift, yet the NPS has no target for - Speech Link
3: Guy Opperman (Con - Hexham) The first, obviously, is that £8.3 billion has gone out to local authorities up and down the country, - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: John McDonnell (Lab - Hayes and Harlington) freedom-of-information request to get a report that was produced by the Prime Minister’s implementation unit on the harm - Speech Link
2: Stephen Timms (Lab - East Ham) First, PIP assessments should routinely be recorded. - Speech Link
3: Marion Fellows (SNP - Motherwell and Wishaw) We do not even have a disabilities Minister, as has been raised many times; I mean no disrespect to the - Speech Link
4: Mims Davies (Con - Mid Sussex) Is there more to do? - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Janet Daby (Lab - Lewisham East) In the context of rising violence and extreme self-harm, does the Minister believe that is acceptable - Speech Link
2: Edward Argar (Con - Charnwood) It was clearly wrong and concerning, but I do have to correct her: the individual involved was at no - Speech Link
3: Dean Russell (Con - Watford) Domestic abuse has no place in modern society or any society. - Speech Link
4: Alex Chalk (Con - Cheltenham) First, would Labour have let out up to 16,000 people during covid—yes or no? We said no. - Speech Link
5: Alex Chalk (Con - Cheltenham) First, we accepted every penny of the Prison Service pay review body recommendations. - Speech Link