Change the law to include laboratory animals in the Animal Welfare Act.

The Government needs to change the law so laboratory animals are included in the Animal Welfare Act. Laboratory animals are currently not protected by the Act and are therefore victims of 'unnecessary suffering' (see section 4 of the Act: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/section/4).

102,245 Signatures

Status
Open
Opened
Tuesday 20th July 2021
Last 24 hours signatures
191
Signature Deadline
Thursday 20th January 2022
Estimated Final Signatures: 118,483

This content was generated for your convenience by Parallel Parliament and does not form part of the official record.
Recent Documents related to Change the law to include laboratory animals in the Animal Welfare Act.

1. Change the law to include laboratory animals in the Animal Welfare Act.
12/07/2021 - Petitions

Found: The Government needs to change the law so laboratory animals are included in the Animal Welfare Act. Laboratory

2. Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill 2017-19
03/09/2019 - Parliamentary Research

Found: 2019 Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill 2017-19 By Elena Ares Contents: 1. Background 2. Animal Welfare

3. Briefing Paper on the Bill
10/03/2021 - Bill Documents

Found: 2019 Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill By Elena Ares Contents : 1. Background 2. Animal Welfare

4. Draft Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill 2017
26/10/2018 - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
- View source

Found: Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Draft Bill Consultation r esponse August

5. Animal Sentience and Brexit
08/07/2019 - Parliamentary Research

Found: Lisbon Treaty and animal sentience 2 1.1 EU Withdrawal Act 3 1.2 The Government™s position 3 1.3 Existing

Latest Documents
Recent Speeches related to Change the law to include laboratory animals in the Animal Welfare Act.

1. Animal Welfare (Service Animals) Bill
08/02/2019 - Commons Chamber

1: Lynch) who has been very supportive but who is currently on maternity duty. They have been great supporters - Speech Link
2: making the compelling case that treating these animals in the criminal justice system as items of property - Speech Link
3: thought it was unpalatable to think of police animals as equipment. In addition, the penalty for criminal - Speech Link

2. Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill (First sitting)
03/02/2021 - Public Bill Committees

1: the seriousness of an offence under any of sections 4, 5, 6(1) and (2), 7 and 8, and the person guilty of - Speech Link

3. Animal Welfare (Service Animals) Bill
01/03/2019 - Lords Chamber

1: those who launched and successfully led the Finn’s law campaign. Finn’s handler, PC Dave Wardell, who has - Speech Link

4. Animal Testing
25/10/2021 - Westminster Hall

1: when they are not speaking, in line with current Government guidance and that of the House of Commons Commission - Speech Link
2: considered e-petitions 581641 and 590216, relating to animal testing.It is a pleasure to serve under - Speech Link

5. Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill (Second sitting)
23/07/2019 - Public Bill Committees

1: the seriousness of an offence under any of sections 4, 5, 6(1) and (2), 7 and 8, and the person guilty of - Speech Link

Latest Speeches
Recent Questions related to Change the law to include laboratory animals in the Animal Welfare Act.
1. Animal Welfare Act 2006
asked by: Gavin Shuker
04/06/2019
... what steps he is taking to provide local authorities with the resources to enforce the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

2. Animal Welfare Act 2006
asked by: Stephanie Peacock
18/03/2019
... what steps he has taken to (a) change the maximum penalty for offences under section 32(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 and (b) make it easier to prosecute attacks on service animals.

3. Animal Welfare Act 2006
asked by: Emma Reynolds
28/01/2019
... when the Government next plans to review compliance with the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

4. Animal Welfare Act 2006
asked by: Kerry McCarthy
15/11/2017
... broken down by type of offences in 2016.

5. Marine Animals: Animal Welfare
asked by: Baroness Hayman of Ullock
07/04/2021
...To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to provide legal protections for aquatic animals.

Latest Questions

You may be interested in these active petitions

1. 'Owen's Law' - Change the law around allergy labelling in UK restaurants - 12,850 signatures
2. Mini’s law - Protect the public and animals from hunting activities - 101,868 signatures
3. Protect the title Nurse in UK law - 30,170 signatures
4. Referendum in the United Kingdom to abolish the Coronavirus Act. - 72,501 signatures
5. Do not change the voting system for Mayoral and PCC elections to FPTP - 6,434 signatures

A recent exposé showed harrowing footage of the factory farming of laboratory dogs in the UK. Experiments on such dogs, and other animals, are today widely reported to be entirely failing the search for human treatments and cures.

Current science from multiple fields proves that animal-based research and testing is not viable. The Government should therefore change the law to include laboratory animals under the protection of the Animal Welfare Act, to prevent their unnecessary suffering.


Petition Signatures over time

Government Response

Friday 20th August 2021

The Government believes animal use for research remains important and The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) provides specific protection for these animals..


There is an explicit exclusion under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 (AWA), to provide for the legitimate conduct of procedures on ‘protected animals’ for scientific or educational purposes that may cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. The use of animals in scientific research remains a vital tool in improving our understanding of how biological systems work both in health and disease. Such use is crucial for the development of new medicines and cutting-edge medical technologies for both humans and animals, and for the protection of our environment.

The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) is the specific piece of legislation which provides protection for these animals:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consolidated-version-of-aspa-1986

No animals may be used under ASPA if there is a validated non-animal alternative that would achieve the scientific outcomes sought. The protections for animals under ASPA include the need for three levels of licence for such procedures to occur, welfare standards which need to be met, and activities including inspection which assure compliance with ASPA. The Home Office is the department responsible for regulating the use of animals under ASPA. If any activity is found to be in breach of what is permitted under ASPA, then the AWA will apply.

Details of how these regulations are administered and operationalised are set out in the Guidance on the operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) available at:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-on-the-operation-of-the-animals-scientific-procedures-act-1986.

Details of the code of practice for housing and accommodation of animals regulated under ASPA approved by Parliament which form a core pillar of compliance assurance activities under ASPA are available at:
Code of practice for the housing and care of animals bred, supplied or used for scientific purposes - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).

Animal testing is required by all global medicines regulators, including the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), to protect human health and safety. Without the testing of potential medicines on animals the development, registration and marketing of new, safe, and effective medicines would not be possible. The animal species for animal testing of potential medicines are specifically chosen to give as much human relevant information as possible and to avoid species specific reactions which would not predict human effects. Many products which would not be safe or effective in humans are detected through animal testing thus avoiding harm to humans. Potential medicines fail in development for many reasons but the fact that medicines are stopped in development for reasons other than unsatisfactory animal testing does not mean that the testing is not essential.

The Government has a policy to limit the number of animals used in science through replacement, reduction, and refinement of research design – the ‘3Rs’. Applicants for licences must demonstrate that they have considered using non-animal alternatives as far as possible. Meanwhile the Government actively supports and funds the development and dissemination of techniques that replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the 3Rs).  This is achieved primarily through funding for the National Centre for the 3Rs (NC3Rs), which works nationally and internationally to drive the uptake of 3Rs technologies and ensure that advances in the 3Rs are reflected in animal research policy, practice and regulations.  NC3Rs has committed £100 million. This includes almost £27 million in contracts through its CRACK IT Challenges scheme to UK and EU-based institutions, mainly focusing on new approaches for the safety assessment of pharmaceuticals and chemicals that reduce the use of animals. 

From the 22 completed CRACK IT Challenges, 12 new products and services have been delivered for industrial and academic end-users. These include miniature wireless devices for recording neural activity in mice; novel human-relevant microphysiological systems and organ on-a-chip platforms for kidney, cardiac and neuronal toxicity assessment; and AI/ in silico modelling platforms for infection, welfare monitoring and toxicology studies. The MHRA work closely with the NC3Rs, bringing together stakeholders in academia, industry, government and animal welfare organisations to facilitate the exchange of information and ideas, and the translation of research findings into practice that benefits animals and science.

To conclude the Government has no plans to amend the Animal Welfare Act (2006). We consider enabling the properly regulated use of animals in science is essential to improving the health and lives of humans and animals and to the safety and sustainability of our environment. Underpinning this is a strong commitment to a rigorous regulatory framework that fully implements the 3Rs and the continued development of non-animal alternatives.

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs


Constituency Data

Reticulating Splines