First elected: 23rd November 2000
Left House: 6th November 2019 (Standing Down)
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Adrian Bailey, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.
Adrian Bailey has not been granted any Urgent Questions
A bill to remove the requirement for small co-operative societies to appoint lay auditors; to increase the threshold for co-operative societies to disapply the full audit requirement to the same level as PLCs; to require auditors to report contingent on a threshold of share capital instead of turnover or on a special resolution at a general meeting; and for connected purposes.
Mutualisation of the Royal Bank of Scotland Bill 2016-17
Sponsor - Gareth Thomas (LAB)
Mutual Guarantee Societies Bill 2016-17
Sponsor - Christina Rees (LAB)
The Government estimates that relief from the costs of the Renewables Obligation and Small Scale Feed in Tariffs scheme will be £1.2bn between 2016/17 and 2019/2020. However the exact cost will depend on the number of companies that apply for the relief; their electricity usage and levels of production.
While the Government has sector electricity data we have limited business level data from a small number of sectors. We do not therefore have an assessment of the number of sectors that pass the sector level test but fail the business level test.
The Government estimates that relief from the costs of the Renewables Obligation and Small Scale Feed in Tariffs scheme will be £1.2bn between 2016/17 and 2019/2020. However the exact cost will depend on the number of companies that apply for the relief; their electricity usage and levels of production.
While the Government has sector electricity data we have limited business level data from a small number of sectors. We do not therefore have an assessment of the number of sectors that pass the sector level test but fail the business level test.
The Government does not forecast skill shortage vacancies. The UK Commission for Employment and Skills published employment and skill projections on 6th March 2014:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-futures-2012-to-2022
The report presents employment projections for the period from 2012 to 2022, based on an assumption that past patterns of behaviour and performance are continued. The projected demand for skills is shown by occupation and qualification rather than by sector, but they do show employment projections for sectors.
The Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) publish information annually on the participation in Higher Education by under-represented students groups in their UK Performance Indicators tables. The available figures on participation by National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) can be located in Table 1a at the following link:
https://www.hesa.ac.uk/pis/09/10/urg
HESA figures show that 73,240 (or 32.6%) of young UK domiciled First degree entrants in UK universities came from socio-economic classifications that comprise small employers/account workers, lower supervisory and technical workers and semi routine or routine occupations.
Information on the social grade of further education learners is not centrally collected.
Table 2 of a Statistical First Release (SFR) presents data on the characteristics of government funded adult (19+) further education learners:
Information on ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) participation is published in Table 3 of a Statistical First Release (SFR):
Employers offer apprenticeships, with training providers delivering the required training within an apprenticeship. Government funding for apprenticeships, including higher apprenticeships, is currently provided by the Skills Funding Agency to apprenticeship training providers.
Information on the number of Government funded higher apprenticeships is published in a Statistical First Release (SFR):
The available information is shown in the tables. The Tables have been compiled by the Higher Education Funding Council and describe the number of Foundation Degree entrants (Table 1) and Qualifiers (Table 2) and those who transfer from HEIs to honours degree level (Table 3a and 3b). The Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) has derived these figures from the HESA standard population (HEIs) and the equivalent population at Further Education Colleges (FECs). Some of the data has been published in the 2010 HEFCE report “Foundation Degree: Key statistics 2001/02 to 2009/10”. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf).
It has not been possible for HEFCE to complete time series data for FECs for all years because of the disproportionate cost in providing this analysis.
Table 1 - Foundation Degree entrants
The number and proportion of UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at Higher Education Institutions and Further Education Colleges in England between 2004/05 and 2012/13, split by the type of registering institution.
Number of foundation degree entrants (UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
2012-13 data is provisional and subject to change
| Type of registering institution |
| |||
| HEI | FEC |
| ||
Year of entry | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Total |
2004-05 | 14,785 | 75% | 4,800 | 25% | 19,585 |
2005-06 | 20,750 | 77% | 6,180 | 23% | 26,930 |
2006-07 | 24,510 | 73% | 8,325 | 25% | 33,735 |
2007-08 | 31,370 | 77% | 9,400 | 23% | 40,770 |
2008-09 | 35,600 | 75% | 11,900 | 25% | 47,495 |
2009-10 | 38,865 | 71% | 14,200 | 26% | 54,950 |
2010-11 | 35,685 | 71% | 13,125 | 26% | 49,920 |
2011-12 | 33,845 | 70% | 13,770 | 28% | 48,350 |
2012-13 | 21,090 | 59% | 14,150 | 40% | 35,700 |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard registration population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Note:
1. Figures up to 2008-09 are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10" (Table 3 of HEFCE 2010/12, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf)
2. Figures from 2009-10 to 2012-13 are unpublished, but drawn from Regional Profiles analysis of the same population as earlier years
The figures since 2009/10 show a decline in foundation degree entrants registered at English HEIs with a particularly sharp decline in 2012/13. Some of the reasons for this trend are discussed in the HEFCE report “Undergraduate courses other than first degrees: an analysis of recent trends” published in April 2014.
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201408c/HEFCE2014_08c.pdf -
Table 2 - Foundation Degree Qualifiers
Number of foundation degree qualifiers (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded | Type of registering institution | |||
HEI | FEC | |||
Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
2004-05 | 4,615 | .. | .. | .. |
2005-06 | 7,225 | .. | .. | .. |
2006-07 | 8,995 | .. | .. | .. |
2007-08 | 11,435 | .. | .. | .. |
2008-09 | 14,355 | 72% | 5,530 | 28% |
2009-10 | 19,500 | 75% | 6,390 | 25% |
2010-11 | 21,520 | 73% | 7,870 | 27% |
2011-12 | 25,200 | . | .. | . |
2012-13 | 23,245 | . | .. | . |
Note:
1. Figures prior to 2008/09 were neither derived or published for FECs because of incomplete data on qualifications awarded being recorded on the Individual Learning Record (ILR)
2. Figures for FECs from 2011/12 can only be provided at disproportionate cost. No information available.
3. Figures for 2009-10 and 2010-11 are unpublished, but drawn from updated analysis of the same population and on the same basis as earlier years
4. HESA standard qualifications obtained at English HEIs from 2011/12. These figures are similar but not directly comparable with earlier years.
. Not Applicable
..Not Available
Table 3a and 3b shows the number of UK Domicile students being awarded a foundation degree who progress in the following academic year from an HEI to study an Honours Programme. Table 3a is not comparable with Table 3b. The figures shown in Table 3a (up to 2009/10) are derived from analysis produced by HEFCE. The data in Table 3b shows qualifiers derived from the HESA standard qualifications obtained population (Table 3b). However, these figures can only be linked forward to study undertaken at a UK HEI (in the following academic year).
Table 3a Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (Sector-wide)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at the same institution | Honours programme registered at a different UK HEI or English FEC | Not on honours programme in following academic year | |||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2003-04, Honours degree in 2004-05 | 1,140 | 47% | 160 | 7% | 1,110 | 46% |
2004-05, Honours degree in 2005-06 | 2,260 | 50% | 225 | 5% | 2,080 | 46% |
2005-06, Honours degree in 2006-07 | 3,385 | 47% | 455 | 6% | 3,385 | 47% |
2006-07, Honours degree in 2007-08 | 4,415 | 49% | 530 | 6% | 4,050 | 45% |
2007-08, Honours degree in 2008-09 | 5,290 | 46% | 870 | 8% | 5,275 | 46% |
2008-09, Honours degree in 2009-10 | 6,530 | 45% | 1,095 | 8% | 6,730 | 47% |
2009-10, Honours degree in 2010-11 | 8,775 | 45% | 1,130 | 6% | 9,590 | 49% |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, 2003-04 to 2009-10
Note:
1. Figures up to 2007-08 qualifiers are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10"
2. Figures are only available for the foundation degree qualifiers from HEIs (only). Figures for qualifiers from FECs who transfer to Honours are not available because of incomplete data qualifications (prior to 2008/09) and disproportionate cost in producing this analysis for FECs (2008/09).
Table 3b - Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (HEI to HEI)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only, into honours programmes at HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at any UK HEI | Not on honours programme at any UK HEI in following academic year | ||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2010-11, Honours degree in 2011-12 | 12,480 | 49% | 13,090 | 51% |
2011-12, Honours degree in 2012-13 | 12,660 | 50% | 12,540 | 50% |
Source: HESA standard qualifications obtained population at English HEIs, linked to any honours degree study registered at a UK HEI in the year following qualification awarded
Note:
1. Figures are not directly comparable with those provided above.
The available information is shown in the tables. The Tables have been compiled by the Higher Education Funding Council and describe the number of Foundation Degree entrants (Table 1) and Qualifiers (Table 2) and those who transfer from HEIs to honours degree level (Table 3a and 3b). The Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) has derived these figures from the HESA standard population (HEIs) and the equivalent population at Further Education Colleges (FECs). Some of the data has been published in the 2010 HEFCE report “Foundation Degree: Key statistics 2001/02 to 2009/10”. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf).
It has not been possible for HEFCE to complete time series data for FECs for all years because of the disproportionate cost in providing this analysis.
Table 1 - Foundation Degree entrants
The number and proportion of UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at Higher Education Institutions and Further Education Colleges in England between 2004/05 and 2012/13, split by the type of registering institution.
Number of foundation degree entrants (UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
2012-13 data is provisional and subject to change
| Type of registering institution |
| |||
| HEI | FEC |
| ||
Year of entry | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Total |
2004-05 | 14,785 | 75% | 4,800 | 25% | 19,585 |
2005-06 | 20,750 | 77% | 6,180 | 23% | 26,930 |
2006-07 | 24,510 | 73% | 8,325 | 25% | 33,735 |
2007-08 | 31,370 | 77% | 9,400 | 23% | 40,770 |
2008-09 | 35,600 | 75% | 11,900 | 25% | 47,495 |
2009-10 | 38,865 | 71% | 14,200 | 26% | 54,950 |
2010-11 | 35,685 | 71% | 13,125 | 26% | 49,920 |
2011-12 | 33,845 | 70% | 13,770 | 28% | 48,350 |
2012-13 | 21,090 | 59% | 14,150 | 40% | 35,700 |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard registration population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Note:
1. Figures up to 2008-09 are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10" (Table 3 of HEFCE 2010/12, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf)
2. Figures from 2009-10 to 2012-13 are unpublished, but drawn from Regional Profiles analysis of the same population as earlier years
The figures since 2009/10 show a decline in foundation degree entrants registered at English HEIs with a particularly sharp decline in 2012/13. Some of the reasons for this trend are discussed in the HEFCE report “Undergraduate courses other than first degrees: an analysis of recent trends” published in April 2014.
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201408c/HEFCE2014_08c.pdf -
Table 2 - Foundation Degree Qualifiers
Number of foundation degree qualifiers (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded | Type of registering institution | |||
HEI | FEC | |||
Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
2004-05 | 4,615 | .. | .. | .. |
2005-06 | 7,225 | .. | .. | .. |
2006-07 | 8,995 | .. | .. | .. |
2007-08 | 11,435 | .. | .. | .. |
2008-09 | 14,355 | 72% | 5,530 | 28% |
2009-10 | 19,500 | 75% | 6,390 | 25% |
2010-11 | 21,520 | 73% | 7,870 | 27% |
2011-12 | 25,200 | . | .. | . |
2012-13 | 23,245 | . | .. | . |
Note:
1. Figures prior to 2008/09 were neither derived or published for FECs because of incomplete data on qualifications awarded being recorded on the Individual Learning Record (ILR)
2. Figures for FECs from 2011/12 can only be provided at disproportionate cost. No information available.
3. Figures for 2009-10 and 2010-11 are unpublished, but drawn from updated analysis of the same population and on the same basis as earlier years
4. HESA standard qualifications obtained at English HEIs from 2011/12. These figures are similar but not directly comparable with earlier years.
. Not Applicable
..Not Available
Table 3a and 3b shows the number of UK Domicile students being awarded a foundation degree who progress in the following academic year from an HEI to study an Honours Programme. Table 3a is not comparable with Table 3b. The figures shown in Table 3a (up to 2009/10) are derived from analysis produced by HEFCE. The data in Table 3b shows qualifiers derived from the HESA standard qualifications obtained population (Table 3b). However, these figures can only be linked forward to study undertaken at a UK HEI (in the following academic year).
Table 3a Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (Sector-wide)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at the same institution | Honours programme registered at a different UK HEI or English FEC | Not on honours programme in following academic year | |||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2003-04, Honours degree in 2004-05 | 1,140 | 47% | 160 | 7% | 1,110 | 46% |
2004-05, Honours degree in 2005-06 | 2,260 | 50% | 225 | 5% | 2,080 | 46% |
2005-06, Honours degree in 2006-07 | 3,385 | 47% | 455 | 6% | 3,385 | 47% |
2006-07, Honours degree in 2007-08 | 4,415 | 49% | 530 | 6% | 4,050 | 45% |
2007-08, Honours degree in 2008-09 | 5,290 | 46% | 870 | 8% | 5,275 | 46% |
2008-09, Honours degree in 2009-10 | 6,530 | 45% | 1,095 | 8% | 6,730 | 47% |
2009-10, Honours degree in 2010-11 | 8,775 | 45% | 1,130 | 6% | 9,590 | 49% |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, 2003-04 to 2009-10
Note:
1. Figures up to 2007-08 qualifiers are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10"
2. Figures are only available for the foundation degree qualifiers from HEIs (only). Figures for qualifiers from FECs who transfer to Honours are not available because of incomplete data qualifications (prior to 2008/09) and disproportionate cost in producing this analysis for FECs (2008/09).
Table 3b - Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (HEI to HEI)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only, into honours programmes at HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at any UK HEI | Not on honours programme at any UK HEI in following academic year | ||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2010-11, Honours degree in 2011-12 | 12,480 | 49% | 13,090 | 51% |
2011-12, Honours degree in 2012-13 | 12,660 | 50% | 12,540 | 50% |
Source: HESA standard qualifications obtained population at English HEIs, linked to any honours degree study registered at a UK HEI in the year following qualification awarded
Note:
1. Figures are not directly comparable with those provided above.
The available information is shown in the tables. The Tables have been compiled by the Higher Education Funding Council and describe the number of Foundation Degree entrants (Table 1) and Qualifiers (Table 2) and those who transfer from HEIs to honours degree level (Table 3a and 3b). The Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) has derived these figures from the HESA standard population (HEIs) and the equivalent population at Further Education Colleges (FECs). Some of the data has been published in the 2010 HEFCE report “Foundation Degree: Key statistics 2001/02 to 2009/10”. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf).
It has not been possible for HEFCE to complete time series data for FECs for all years because of the disproportionate cost in providing this analysis.
Table 1 - Foundation Degree entrants
The number and proportion of UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at Higher Education Institutions and Further Education Colleges in England between 2004/05 and 2012/13, split by the type of registering institution.
Number of foundation degree entrants (UK-domiciled foundation degree entrants at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
2012-13 data is provisional and subject to change
| Type of registering institution |
| |||
| HEI | FEC |
| ||
Year of entry | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Total |
2004-05 | 14,785 | 75% | 4,800 | 25% | 19,585 |
2005-06 | 20,750 | 77% | 6,180 | 23% | 26,930 |
2006-07 | 24,510 | 73% | 8,325 | 25% | 33,735 |
2007-08 | 31,370 | 77% | 9,400 | 23% | 40,770 |
2008-09 | 35,600 | 75% | 11,900 | 25% | 47,495 |
2009-10 | 38,865 | 71% | 14,200 | 26% | 54,950 |
2010-11 | 35,685 | 71% | 13,125 | 26% | 49,920 |
2011-12 | 33,845 | 70% | 13,770 | 28% | 48,350 |
2012-13 | 21,090 | 59% | 14,150 | 40% | 35,700 |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard registration population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Note:
1. Figures up to 2008-09 are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10" (Table 3 of HEFCE 2010/12, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/201012/10_12.pdf)
2. Figures from 2009-10 to 2012-13 are unpublished, but drawn from Regional Profiles analysis of the same population as earlier years
The figures since 2009/10 show a decline in foundation degree entrants registered at English HEIs with a particularly sharp decline in 2012/13. Some of the reasons for this trend are discussed in the HEFCE report “Undergraduate courses other than first degrees: an analysis of recent trends” published in April 2014.
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201408c/HEFCE2014_08c.pdf -
Table 2 - Foundation Degree Qualifiers
Number of foundation degree qualifiers (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers at HEIs and FECs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, and the equivalent population at English further education colleges, 2005-06 to 2012-13
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded | Type of registering institution | |||
HEI | FEC | |||
Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
2004-05 | 4,615 | .. | .. | .. |
2005-06 | 7,225 | .. | .. | .. |
2006-07 | 8,995 | .. | .. | .. |
2007-08 | 11,435 | .. | .. | .. |
2008-09 | 14,355 | 72% | 5,530 | 28% |
2009-10 | 19,500 | 75% | 6,390 | 25% |
2010-11 | 21,520 | 73% | 7,870 | 27% |
2011-12 | 25,200 | . | .. | . |
2012-13 | 23,245 | . | .. | . |
Note:
1. Figures prior to 2008/09 were neither derived or published for FECs because of incomplete data on qualifications awarded being recorded on the Individual Learning Record (ILR)
2. Figures for FECs from 2011/12 can only be provided at disproportionate cost. No information available.
3. Figures for 2009-10 and 2010-11 are unpublished, but drawn from updated analysis of the same population and on the same basis as earlier years
4. HESA standard qualifications obtained at English HEIs from 2011/12. These figures are similar but not directly comparable with earlier years.
. Not Applicable
..Not Available
Table 3a and 3b shows the number of UK Domicile students being awarded a foundation degree who progress in the following academic year from an HEI to study an Honours Programme. Table 3a is not comparable with Table 3b. The figures shown in Table 3a (up to 2009/10) are derived from analysis produced by HEFCE. The data in Table 3b shows qualifiers derived from the HESA standard qualifications obtained population (Table 3b). However, these figures can only be linked forward to study undertaken at a UK HEI (in the following academic year).
Table 3a Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (Sector-wide)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at the same institution | Honours programme registered at a different UK HEI or English FEC | Not on honours programme in following academic year | |||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2003-04, Honours degree in 2004-05 | 1,140 | 47% | 160 | 7% | 1,110 | 46% |
2004-05, Honours degree in 2005-06 | 2,260 | 50% | 225 | 5% | 2,080 | 46% |
2005-06, Honours degree in 2006-07 | 3,385 | 47% | 455 | 6% | 3,385 | 47% |
2006-07, Honours degree in 2007-08 | 4,415 | 49% | 530 | 6% | 4,050 | 45% |
2007-08, Honours degree in 2008-09 | 5,290 | 46% | 870 | 8% | 5,275 | 46% |
2008-09, Honours degree in 2009-10 | 6,530 | 45% | 1,095 | 8% | 6,730 | 47% |
2009-10, Honours degree in 2010-11 | 8,775 | 45% | 1,130 | 6% | 9,590 | 49% |
Source: HEFCE analysis of the HESA standard qualifiers population at English HEIs, 2003-04 to 2009-10
Note:
1. Figures up to 2007-08 qualifiers are as published in "Foundation degree: Key statistics 2001-02 to 2009-10"
2. Figures are only available for the foundation degree qualifiers from HEIs (only). Figures for qualifiers from FECs who transfer to Honours are not available because of incomplete data qualifications (prior to 2008/09) and disproportionate cost in producing this analysis for FECs (2008/09).
Table 3b - Foundation Degree qualifiers progressing to an Honours Programme (HEI to HEI)
Progression to honours programme (UK-domiciled foundation degree qualifiers registered at HEIs in England)
Full person equivalent (FPE) numbers, which have been rounded to the nearest 5
Note: Progression of qualifiers from HEIs only, into honours programmes at HEIs only
Year of foundation degree qualification awarded, progression to honours degree study in the following academic year | Honours programme registered at any UK HEI | Not on honours programme at any UK HEI in following academic year | ||
Number of qualifiers | Proportion | Number of qualifiers | Proportion | |
2010-11, Honours degree in 2011-12 | 12,480 | 49% | 13,090 | 51% |
2011-12, Honours degree in 2012-13 | 12,660 | 50% | 12,540 | 50% |
Source: HESA standard qualifications obtained population at English HEIs, linked to any honours degree study registered at a UK HEI in the year following qualification awarded
Note:
1. Figures are not directly comparable with those provided above.
The Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) collects and publishes data on student qualifiers at UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The number of students registered at an English Higher Education Institution, who qualified with a Higher National Diploma (HND) and a Higher National Certificate (HNC) in the last 10 years can be found in the table below.
It has not been possible to provide a time series data for FECs because of the disproportionate cost in providing this analysis.
Qualifiers from HND and HNC courses by mode of study
Registered at English Higher Education Institutions
Academic year 2003/04 to 2012/13
Level of study | Mode of study | 2003/04 | 2004/05 | 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 |
HND | Full-Time | 7,660
| 6,035
| 5,025
| 3,980
| 3,475
| 2,630
| 2,635
| 2,460
| 2,385
| 1,955
|
| Part-Time | 1,575
| 1,465
| 1,140
| 1,140
| 860
| 720
| 710
| 565
| 540
| 515
|
| Total | 9,235
| 7,500
| 6,165
| 5,120
| 4,335
| 3,350
| 3,345
| 3,025
| 2,925
| 2,470
|
HNC | Full-Time | 135
| 125
| 160
| 160
| 75
| 55
| 135
| 160
| 115
| 215
|
| Part-Time | 3,940
| 3,195
| 2,995
| 2,780
| 2,745
| 2,900
| 3,155
| 2,320
| 2,275
| 1,785
|
| Total | 4,075
| 3,320
| 3,155
| 2,945
| 2,825
| 2,955
| 3,295
| 2,480
| 2,390
| 2,000
|
Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency Student Record
Notes:
1. Figures are based on HESA qualifications obtained population and have been rounded up or down to the nearest multiple of five, so components may not sum to totals.
2. Students registered at English HEIs will include both students studying at English HEIs and students franchised at Further Education Colleges.
The proportion of postgraduate final year trainee teachers awarded qualified teacher status, who were in a teaching post within 6 months of qualifying, is published in the Department’s annual initial teacher training (ITT) Performance Profiles statistical release. This is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/initial-teacher-training-performance-profiles-2015-to-2016.
A time series of data for England are published in table 5a of the ‘Main Tables’ of the latest publication, which relates to trainees in the 2015/16 academic year.
Statistics by region are available for the 2014/15 and 2015/16 academic years in the ‘Main Text’ of the relevant publications. The Department does not publish this data by local authority district, but figures are available by ITT provider in the Provider-level tables.
The latest data shows that 95% of postgraduate trainee teachers who were awarded Qualified Teacher Status were employed in a teaching post within six months of qualifying[1].
Initial Teacher Training (ITT) providers are required to demonstrate that their trainees go on to secure employment in schools; employment rates are one of the outcome measures that Ofsted uses to grade ITT providers.
The Department is developing a free national digital service for schools to publish teacher vacancies and for teachers to search for them. This new service will assist newly registered teachers to find posts.
The Department is also testing early-career payments for new maths teachers; they will receive a generous upfront payment of £20,000 and two early retention payments of at least £5,000 in their third and fifth year of teaching, wherever they teach in England, or £7,500 in 39 local authorities. In addition, teachers will benefit from the student loan repayment threshold rise, and a pilot student loan reimbursement programme for science and Modern Foreign Language teachers in 25 local authorities, in the early years of their career.
We want to ensure that everyone has access to high-quality education and training, which is why we are spending around £7billion on education and training for 16 to 19-year-olds this year. All of this funding helps to reduce the number of young people who are classified as not in education, employment or training (NEET) by ensuring there are attractive options available.
The Department’s NEET reduction strategy is working and numbers are the lowest since consistent records began - the proportion of 16- to 18-year-olds who are NEET has reduced from 9.8% in 2011 to 6.5% in 2015[1]. Funding allocations within this budget which especially help support young people at risk of being NEET reflect these year on year successes, including:
o academic years 2013/14 - £594million; 2014/15 - £573million; 2015/16 - £569million; 2016/17 - £544million;
o financial years 2011-12 - £365million; 2012-13 - £240million; 2013-14 – £212million; 2014-15 - £239million; 2015-16 – £239million;[3]
o we estimate expenditure in academic years 2013/14 - £20million; 2014/15 - £35million; 2015/16 - £45million
financial years 2012-13 - £6.9million; 2013-14 - £11.3million; 2014-15 - £23million; 2015-16[6].
[1] Participation in education, training and employment: 2015: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/participation-in-education-training-and-employment-2015
2 Equivalent information for earlier years is unavailable because the disadvantage block funding system changed in 2013
[3] Financial year 2015-16 figures are extracts from the management accounts, final figures will be available once the statutory accounts are published
[4] Traineeships were introduced in 2013. Providers target Traineeship programmes at particular groups, most commonly young people who are NEET and/or on benefits: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-young-people-to-develop-the-skills-for-apprenticeships-and-sustainable-employment-framework-for-delivery
[5] These are approximations based on 16-18-year-old enrolments as funding for Traineeships is included in general provider allocations
[6] The process of collecting 2015-16 delivery data for financial claims has not been completed so a reliable figure for 2015-16 is not available at this time
Local authorities collect information to identify young people who are not participating in education and training, or who are at risk of not doing so, to allow them to target their resources on those who need them most. The information collected is submitted to the Department for Education monthly, including the numbers and proportions of young people in each local authority area that are not in education, employment or training (NEET) or whose activity is unknown. The Department publishes data for each local authority including:
Numbers of public or private sector employers offering apprenticeships is not counted by the Department. We do publish information on workplaces offering apprenticeships, which counts the number of individual workplaces at site level. However one employer may have multiple sites. This can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/570133/apprenticeships-workplaces-by-region.xlsx
Latest data on apprenticeship starts by constituency and region can be found in the supplementary tables accompanying the Statistical First Release SFA/SFR36, published on 17 November 2016: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/570129/learner-participation-outcomes-and-level-of-highest-qualification-data-tables-November16.xls
The table shows apprenticeship participation in 2015/16 (provisional) by age group for the West Bromwich West constituency:
Age | 2015/16 (provisional) |
Under 19 | 490 |
19-24 | 670 |
25+ | 990 |
Total | 2,100 |
Notes:
Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. Totals are rounded to the nearest 100.
A learner is participating in an academic year if their learning aim is active at any point during the relevant period.
The following tables show the proportion of 18, 19 and 20 year-olds who had achieved A*-C grade in GCSE English and GCSE mathematics. The figures relate to academic age, that is age at the start of the academic year, so young people of academic age 18 are those turning 19 during the academic year. The figures cover young people who were in the state sector at academic age 15. The data source used for this analysis does not differentiate between English Literature and English Language so the figures for English include those that have A*-C in either subject. The Department does not hold information on the attainment of people older than academic age 20. The earliest data available is for the cohort that was academic age 18 in 2004/05.
Proportion achieving A*-C grade in GCSE mathematics by academic age and cohort
Academic age | |||
Cohort academic age 18 in | 18 | 19 | 20 |
2004/05 | 49.3% | 49.4% | 49.4% |
2005/06 | 48.6% | 48.7% | 48.8% |
2006/07 | 50.5% | 50.6% | 50.6% |
2007/08 | 52.7% | 52.7% | 52.8% |
2008/09 | 54.6% | 54.7% | 54.7% |
2009/10 | 56.5% | 56.6% | 56.7% |
2010/11 | 59.1% | 59.2% | 59.3% |
2011/12 | 61.9% | 62.0% | |
2012/13 | 65.2% |
Source: DfE Young Person's Matched Administrative Dataset.
Proportion achieving A*-C grade in GCSE English by academic age and cohort
Academic age | |||
Cohort academic age 18 in | 18 | 19 | 20 |
2004/05 | 55.9% | 56.0% | 56.0% |
2005/06 | 56.7% | 56.8% | 56.9% |
2006/07 | 57.3% | 57.4% | 57.4% |
2007/08 | 58.9% | 58.9% | 59.0% |
2008/09 | 60.1% | 60.2% | 60.2% |
2009/10 | 61.2% | 61.3% | 61.4% |
2010/11 | 63.2% | 63.3% | 63.3% |
2011/12 | 65.4% | 65.5% | |
2012/13 | 69.0% |
Source: DfE Young Person's Matched Administrative Dataset.
DFID discusses regularly the impact of Exit with development organisations. Leaving the EU will not change the UK’s commitment to support the world’s poorest, and our world-class development sector will continue to be a crucial part of delivering that commitment.
I have not undertaken an assessment of the potential use by passenger services of freight routes in Birmingham and the Black Country. Network Rail is currently reviewing the West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy, published on 27 May 2011, to assess any changes in the level of passenger and freight demand.
Automatic enrolment has achieved a quiet revolution through getting employees into the habit of pension saving, and reversing the decline in workplace pension participation in the decade prior to these reforms. Since automatic enrolment started in 2012 participation rates have been transformed with 87% of eligible employees saving into a workplace pension in 2018, up from 55% in 2012.
The Department does not hold data for individual constituencies in relation to opt outs or the number of individuals who have saved above the automatic enrolment minimum contribution level. However, we do know that overall around 9% of automatically enrolled workers have chosen to opt out which is significantly below original estimates; and our latest evaluation report shows that, in April 2017, approximately 5.9 million eligible employees were already meeting the April 2019 minimum contribution rates1.
I am providing the following information about the impact of automatic enrolment in your constituency, as at end of September 20192:
In the West Bromwich West constituency since 2012, approximately 16,000 eligible jobholders have been automatically enrolled and 1480 employers have met their duties.
1Automatic Enrolment Evaluation Report 2018, available via the following weblink: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/764964/Automatic_Enrolment_Evaluation_Report_2018.pdf.
2The Pensions Regulator’s data on Automatic enrolment declaration of compliance by constituency, available via the following weblink:
https://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/en/document-library/research-and-analysis/data-requests
This Government is committed to legislating to facilitate the delivery of collective defined contribution schemes when parliamentary time allows.
Once someone has been awarded Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which can be paid at one of eight rates, that award will be reviewed. Reviews of PIP are a key part of the benefit to ensure that awards remain correct where needs may change (including where needs increase and the award may need to increase) and that we maintain contact with the claimant, both features that are missing from its predecessor Disability Living Allowance. The length of an award is based on an individual’s circumstances and can vary from nine months to an on-going award, with a light touch review after ten years.
We introduced updated guidance for case managers and an updated PIP Assessment Guide in 2018 which will ensure that those people who receive the highest level of support under PIP, and where their needs are unlikely to change or may get worse, will now receive an ongoing award with a light touch review at the ten-year point. In line with PIP’s aim to be needs-based rather than condition-based, the change to the guidance is not condition specific. However, we believe the changes will ensure that those with severe and/or progressive conditions receive the most appropriate award duration that reflects their condition and the needs arising.
Special considerations also apply to claimants who are terminally ill, and our arrangements recognise the particular difficulties faced by people who only have a short time to live. Claims by people with a terminal illness are fast tracked, are not subject to a face-to-face assessment and they are guaranteed the enhanced rate of the Daily Living Component; nearly all also receive the enhanced rate of mobility.
Once someone has been awarded Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which can be paid at one of eight rates, that award will be reviewed. Reviews of PIP are a key part of the benefit to ensure that awards remain correct where needs may change (including where needs increase and the award may need to increase) and that we maintain contact with the claimant, both features that are missing from its predecessor Disability Living Allowance. The length of an award is based on an individual’s circumstances and can vary from nine months to an on-going award, with a light touch review after ten years.
We introduced updated guidance for case managers and an updated PIP Assessment Guide in 2018 which will ensure that those people who receive the highest level of support under PIP, and where their needs are unlikely to change or may get worse, will now receive an ongoing award with a light touch review at the ten-year point. In line with PIP’s aim to be needs-based rather than condition-based, the change to the guidance is not condition specific. However, we believe the changes will ensure that those with severe and/or progressive conditions receive the most appropriate award duration that reflects their condition and the needs arising.
Special considerations also apply to claimants who are terminally ill, and our arrangements recognise the particular difficulties faced by people who only have a short time to live. Claims by people with a terminal illness are fast tracked, are not subject to a face-to-face assessment and they are guaranteed the enhanced rate of the Daily Living Component; nearly all also receive the enhanced rate of mobility.
In September 2017, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence announced its plans for a full update to the existing clinical guideline on the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) to ensure that treatment reflects the latest available evidence. The revised guideline will be published in 2020.
Since 2011, we have also invested £6 million into research into CFS/ME via the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is currently developing guidance on the use of Spinraza (nusinersen) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy, including types 2 and 3.
NHS England and NICE have been in discussions with the manufacturer of Spinraza, Biogen, to explore whether there are commercial flexibilities that might enable NICE to recommend the drug as a clinically and cost effective use of NHS resources. Biogen has now submitted a revised submission for NICE’s independent Appraisal Committee to consider and a meeting has been arranged for 6 March 2019 to consider the recommendations. In the absence of final guidance from NICE, clinicians can apply to NHS England for funding in exceptional cases through the individual funding request process.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is currently developing guidance on the use of Spinraza (nusinersen) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy, including types 2 and 3.
NHS England and NICE have been in discussions with the manufacturer of Spinraza, Biogen, to explore whether there are commercial flexibilities that might enable NICE to recommend the drug as a clinically and cost effective use of NHS resources. Biogen has now submitted a revised submission for NICE’s independent Appraisal Committee to consider and a meeting has been arranged for 6 March 2019 to consider the recommendations. In the absence of final guidance from NICE, clinicians can apply to NHS England for funding in exceptional cases through the individual funding request process.
We continue to call on the Government of Zimbabwe to investigate all allegations of human rights violations and urge them to follow the due process of law for all those arrested in connection to January's protests. The British Embassy in Harare regularly raise the rights of protestors in their meetings with the Government of Zimbabwe.
I summoned the Zimbabwean Ambassador on 17 January to urge the security forces to stop using disproportionate force and reinforce the right of the people of Zimbabwe to protest. On 30 January, I spoke to Zimbabwean Foreign Minister Moyo, repeating our calls for an end to human rights abuses and a full investigation into all alleged abuse, including arbitrary arrests.
The Government carefully considered the case for reform prior to announcing this change last year, and it is the Government’s view that taxpayers can reasonably expect that when they have successfully paid their taxes, these go to fund public services as intended.
This measure represents a proportionate approach that balances the interests of taxpayers, the Exchequer, and other creditors.
The Government expects the impact on the sustainability of Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to be marginal. This reform will not lead to a significant change in recoveries to the PPF compared to current returns.
The Government does not expect this reform to affect significantly SMEs’ access to finance or corporate insolvencies, and in line with the Government’s commitment to open and consultative policymaking is engaging with a wide variety of stakeholders to ensure policy changes are well informed and based upon the best available evidence.
The Government carefully considered the case for reform prior to announcing this change last year, and it is the Government’s view that taxpayers can reasonably expect that when they have successfully paid their taxes, these go to fund public services as intended.
This measure represents a proportionate approach that balances the interests of taxpayers, the Exchequer, and other creditors.
The Government expects the impact on the sustainability of Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to be marginal. This reform will not lead to a significant change in recoveries to the PPF compared to current returns.
The Government does not expect this reform to affect significantly SMEs’ access to finance or corporate insolvencies, and in line with the Government’s commitment to open and consultative policymaking is engaging with a wide variety of stakeholders to ensure policy changes are well informed and based upon the best available evidence.
The Government carefully considered the case for reform prior to announcing this change last year, and it is the Government’s view that taxpayers can reasonably expect that when they have successfully paid their taxes, these go to fund public services as intended.
This measure represents a proportionate approach that balances the interests of taxpayers, the Exchequer, and other creditors.
The Government expects the impact on the sustainability of Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to be marginal. This reform will not lead to a significant change in recoveries to the PPF compared to current returns.
The Government does not expect this reform to affect significantly SMEs’ access to finance or corporate insolvencies, and in line with the Government’s commitment to open and consultative policymaking is engaging with a wide variety of stakeholders to ensure policy changes are well informed and based upon the best available evidence.
The Government carefully considered the case for reform prior to announcing this change last year, and it is the Government’s view that taxpayers can reasonably expect that when they have successfully paid their taxes, these go to fund public services as intended.
This measure represents a proportionate approach that balances the interests of taxpayers, the Exchequer, and other creditors.
The Government expects the impact on the sustainability of Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to be marginal. This reform will not lead to a significant change in recoveries to the PPF compared to current returns.
The Government does not expect this reform to affect significantly SMEs’ access to finance or corporate insolvencies, and in line with the Government’s commitment to open and consultative policymaking is engaging with a wide variety of stakeholders to ensure policy changes are well informed and based upon the best available evidence.
It is not a regulated activity for firms to issue their own securities, including mini-bonds, due to an exemption within the Regulated Activities Order 2001. This exemption exists to ensure that companies in the real economy can raise finance to fund their business without having to become authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
However, to protect consumers, the marketing and promotion of such securities, including mini-bonds, are subject to the financial promotion restrictions set out in the Financial Services and Markets Act. This requires that the content of any financial promotion be approved by an FCA authorised firm unless an exemption applies. It is the responsibility of the FCA authorised firm to ensure the financial promotion is clear, fair and not misleading. Authorised firms that fail to meet these requirements may be subject to enforcement action by the FCA.
HM Treasury keeps the regulatory framework for financial services under review, and updates it as necessary. We are committed to maintaining a strong and safe financial system, with high standards of consumer protection. On 1 April, I announced that I will direct the FCA to launch an investigation into the events at London Capital & Finance, a firm which issued mini-bonds in order to fund loans that it made to other parties. This followed a request from the FCA Chair, Charles Randell, to launch such an investigation.
UK traders that only trade with the EU will need an EORI number in the event the UK leaves the EU without a deal. HMRC estimated that in 2017 there were 144,000 VAT-registered traders that only traded with the EU. A separate estimate indicates there are approximately 100,000 non VAT-registered traders that trade only with the EU. The latest HMRC validated data shows that in the three months to 1 March 2019, which covers the period from the start of the business readiness campaign, there were 53,098 registrations for an EORI number, and numbers are growing each week.
As HMRC only holds information on UK-EU traders that are VAT-registered, a large population of traders would not automatically receive an EORI number if they were automatically generated. Providing numbers for some traders that needed it, but not all, would send mixed messages about whether it was required. Furthermore, the VAT registration details for a trader can be different from the trading entity that needs an EORI number, meaning automated registration could result in registering the wrong entity.
The Government has focused on ensuring the process of applying for an EORI is free and very quick, it currently takes around 10 minutes. The Government has also recently announced temporary simplified procedures to make importing and exporting easier. To register for these simplifications, traders will need a UK EORI number. Therefore, completing the application is a good first step for traders.
The £5 million grant fund, which includes the £2 million to support customs intermediaries and traders who complete customs declarations with the cost of training, does not include any administration costs. Any costs associated with administering the scheme are accounted for separately. The full £5 million grant fund is available for bids from intermediaries and traders.
This £2 million funding to support the cost of training is part of a wider £8 million investment to support the sector ahead of the UK leaving the EU, which includes a further £3 million in grant funding for IT improvements and £3 million which is being used to increase training provision in this area.
Applications are still being received, but as of 5 March 2019 124 applications have been submitted for the training grants available to customs intermediaries and traders who complete customs declarations. Applications are subject to a review process once submitted, and so far 43 training grants have either been offered or have already been paid.
UK traders that only trade with the EU will need an EORI number in the event the UK leaves the EU without a deal. HMRC estimated that in 2017 there were 144,000 VAT-registered traders that only traded with the EU. A separate estimate indicates there are approximately 100,000 non VAT-registered traders that trade only with the EU. The latest HMRC validated data shows that in the three months to 1 March 2019, which covers the period from the start of the business readiness campaign, there were 53,098 registrations for an EORI number, and numbers are growing each week.
As HMRC only holds information on UK-EU traders that are VAT-registered, a large population of traders would not automatically receive an EORI number if they were automatically generated. Providing numbers for some traders that needed it, but not all, would send mixed messages about whether it was required. Furthermore, the VAT registration details for a trader can be different from the trading entity that needs an EORI number, meaning automated registration could result in registering the wrong entity.
The Government has focused on ensuring the process of applying for an EORI is free and very quick, it currently takes around 10 minutes. The Government has also recently announced temporary simplified procedures to make importing and exporting easier. To register for these simplifications, traders will need a UK EORI number. Therefore, completing the application is a good first step for traders.
UK traders that only trade with the EU will need an EORI number in the event the UK leaves the EU without a deal. HMRC estimated that in 2017 there were 144,000 VAT-registered traders that only traded with the EU. A separate estimate indicates there are approximately 100,000 non VAT-registered traders that trade only with the EU. The latest HMRC validated data shows that in the three months to 1 March 2019, which covers the period from the start of the business readiness campaign, there were 53,098 registrations for an EORI number, and numbers are growing each week.
As HMRC only holds information on UK-EU traders that are VAT-registered, a large population of traders would not automatically receive an EORI number if they were automatically generated. Providing numbers for some traders that needed it, but not all, would send mixed messages about whether it was required. Furthermore, the VAT registration details for a trader can be different from the trading entity that needs an EORI number, meaning automated registration could result in registering the wrong entity.
The Government has focused on ensuring the process of applying for an EORI is free and very quick, it currently takes around 10 minutes. The Government has also recently announced temporary simplified procedures to make importing and exporting easier. To register for these simplifications, traders will need a UK EORI number. Therefore, completing the application is a good first step for traders.
The UK may make an extradition request to a country with which it does not have an extradition treaty for a person who is accused or convicted of an offence in the UK.
The UK does not recognise the so-called "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus." There are no arrangements in place for police forces in England and Wales to investigate criminal suspects in the northern part of Cyprus.
It would be inappropriate to comment on any matter relating to this case as this is the subject of ongoing UK-based court appeals.
Decisions to deploy police officers abroad to investigate criminal offences are operational matters for chief officers and the relevant authorities involved.
The UK does not recognise the so-called "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus." There are no arrangements in place for police forces in England and Wales to investigate criminal suspects in the northern part of Cyprus.
It would be inappropriate to comment on any matter relating to this case as this is the subject of ongoing UK-based court appeals.
Decisions to deploy police officers abroad to investigate criminal offences are operational matters for chief officers and the relevant authorities involved.
The UK does not recognise the so-called "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus." There are no arrangements in place for police forces in England and Wales to investigate criminal suspects in the northern part of Cyprus.
It would be inappropriate to comment on any matter relating to this case as this is the subject of ongoing UK-based court appeals.
Decisions to deploy police officers abroad to investigate criminal offences are operational matters for chief officers and the relevant authorities involved.
The UK does not recognise the so-called "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus." There are no arrangements in place for police forces in England and Wales to investigate criminal suspects in the northern part of Cyprus.
It would be inappropriate to comment on any matter relating to this case as this is the subject of ongoing UK-based court appeals.
Decisions to deploy police officers abroad to investigate criminal offences are operational matters for chief officers and the relevant authorities involved.
The Government is aware of the change in the Valuation Office Agency’s approach to assessing units within buildings of multiple occupation, which follows the Supreme Court judgement in the Mazars v Woolway case. The Government is considering the implications of this judgement. Following Budget 2016, the Government announced a wide-ranging package of measures to support rate payers, that will be worth £9 billion over the next five years.
The Government is aware of the change in the Valuation Office Agency’s approach to assessing units within buildings of multiple occupation, which follows the Supreme Court judgement in the Mazars v Woolway case. The Government is considering the implications of this judgement. Following Budget 2016, the Government announced a wide-ranging package of measures to support rate payers, that will be worth £9 billion over the next five years.
Ministers from the Minsitry of Justice have not met directly with Ministers from Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to discuss the proposed reform of the apprenticeship scheme.
We currently only offer apprenticeships to existing members of staff, and so any proposed reforms to apprenticeship schemes will not have any impact on our current policies and processes.