Mentions:
1: None Relevant documents: 33rd and 41st Reports from the Delegated Powers Committee, 11th Report from the Constitution - Speech Link
2: None statement This new clause would raise the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales from ten - Speech Link
3: Baroness Brinton (LD - Life peer) We have heard from both the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, and the noble and learned Baroness, - Speech Link
4: None , from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. - Speech Link
5: None As the noble and learned Lord said, this originated from Kim Johnson’s Private Member’s Bill. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None Amendment 77 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Moraes, seeks to remove Clause 22(1) and (2), extending - Speech Link
2: Baroness Blake of Leeds (Lab - Life peer) right from other nationality functions when exercising duties under Section 55 and Clause 21.While I - Speech Link
3: None : Clause 26, page 45, line 11, leave out from “18” to end of line 12 and insert “are subject to the Senedd - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: None Relevant documents: 33rd and 41st Reports from the Delegated Powers Committee, 11th Report from the Constitution - Speech Link
2: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer) He directed the Committee to the front page of the Bill and said that, in his view, the Bill was compliant - Speech Link
3: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) to adopt the framework from our 2023 Bill, and they must now go further. - Speech Link
4: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) have given a commitment from this Dispatch Box that that code of practice and this clause, if the Bill - Speech Link
5: Lord Strasburger (LD - Life peer) and the clause will not change that”. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Robbie Moore (Con - Keighley and Ilkley) I could not agree more, but I suspect that the Minister will come out and reiterate the lines from the - Speech Link
2: Rachael Maskell (LAB - York Central) We see the revolving door of those from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change and people from his - Speech Link
3: Edward Leigh (Con - Gainsborough) The Doorkeeper must remove that person from the Public Gallery immediately. [Interruption.] - Speech Link
4: Victoria Collins (LD - Harpenden and Berkhamsted) MPs from across the House and from basically all the parties have presented not only their legitimate - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness O'Loan (XB - Life peer) influence, the reason must surely be recorded.Amendment 405 would remove from the Bill the requirement - Speech Link
2: Baroness Berridge (Con - Life peer) It advised the sponsor of the Bill to remove the Clause 15 power and to align the other clauses, because - Speech Link
3: Baroness Lawlor (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I would like to refer to Amendment 6 from the noble and learned Lord the sponsor of the Bill - Speech Link
4: Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con - Life peer) I would like to hear from the sponsor of the Bill, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, what his - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Baroness Doocey (LD - Life peer) regrettably and surprisingly, remains absent from the Bill. - Speech Link
2: Lord Katz (Lab - Life peer) , to and from the property. - Speech Link
3: Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) same reasons why Clause 63 was not in the Online Safety Bill or the Data (Use and Access) Bill. - Speech Link
4: Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Lab - Life peer) The amendment would remove from the scope of paragraph 17 activity that is already regulated and governed - Speech Link
5: None scope and mechanics of what is intended need to be set out in the Bill from inception. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Callanan (Con - Life peer) In essence, it is a clear and faithful description of the effects of the provisions of the Bill. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Lab - Life peer) It may well be.On the clause stand part notice, Clause 1 sets out when the different clauses of the Bill - Speech Link
3: Lord Callanan (Con - Life peer) before the Bill could proceed, the Government, and the noble Baroness, Lady Chapman, from the Dispatch - Speech Link
4: None Government accepted the amendments to the Nationality and Borders Bill in 2022. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Browne of Ladyton (Lab - Life peer) states on the list and to remove from the list states that are no longer safe. - Speech Link
2: Lord Cashman (Non-affiliated - Life peer) introduced by the Nationality and Borders Act 2022. - Speech Link
3: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) and Borders Act within six months of the passing of the Bill. - Speech Link
4: None This amendment restores the common law position and repeals section 37 of the Nationality and Borders - Speech Link
5: None When noble Lords decided against sending the Nationality and Borders Bill back to the other place for - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord German (LD - Life peer) the established visa penalty mechanisms contained within the Nationality and Borders Act 2022. - Speech Link
2: None My Amendment 71 would amend existing provisions in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 to remove optionality - Speech Link
3: None The existing provisions of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 give the Secretary of estate discretion - Speech Link
4: Lord Lemos (Lab - Life peer) departure from the original purpose of this section in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 to secure - Speech Link
5: None The existing provisions in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 already give the Home Secretary sufficient - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Lord Callanan (Con - Life peer) before the House, and the Bill subsequently received minimal scrutiny. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee (Non-affiliated - Life peer) You remove the Chagos Islanders from their homes by force and now they do not have self-determination - Speech Link
3: Lord De Mauley (Con - Excepted Hereditary) of the archipelago; and the costs arising from the agreement.As regards defence and security, witnesses - Speech Link
4: Lord Murray of Blidworth (Con - Life peer) Section 3 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 —a Conservative piece of legislation—was the first - Speech Link