Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

Debate between Dan Jarvis and Nusrat Ghani
Wednesday 2nd July 2025

(4 days, 10 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John McDonnell Portrait John McDonnell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

Nusrat Ghani Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Ms Nusrat Ghani)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I think it is clear that at this point the Minister does not wish to give way. He has until 5.27 pm, so let us see how this progresses.

Dan Jarvis Portrait Dan Jarvis
- Hansard - -

These attacks have resulted in serious damage to property and crossed the legal threshold from direct criminal action into terrorism. Members have used violence against people responding at the scenes of attacks, and have been charged with a series of serious offences, including violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent and aggravated burglary, which is an offence involving a weapon. This order would degrade their harmful activity. It will also reduce the threat—particularly to vulnerable individuals—from MMC’s violent content, and it will reinforce our support for Ukraine and our commitment to countering extreme right-wing terrorism in Europe.

--- Later in debate ---
Nusrat Ghani Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That was not a point of order. The Minister may wish to respond—he has a few minutes in which to do so—but that was not a point of order.

Dan Jarvis Portrait Dan Jarvis
- Hansard - -

I am happy to respond directly to the right hon. Gentleman’s point of order. The process of proscription requires this House to agree such action. Should the House do so later this evening, it would then go to the other place, and it would be for the other place to agree the action or not. It would then be for the Home Secretary or myself to sign an order, and that order would then become law at midnight on the night it had been signed.

--- Later in debate ---
John McDonnell Portrait John McDonnell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What if I oppose it tomorrow? What if I suggest it is wrong?

Nusrat Ghani Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. Minister, continue.

Dan Jarvis Portrait Dan Jarvis
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I do not think the right hon. Gentleman listened to what I said—I just explained to him the process that is in place.

I am grateful to all of those who have considered this matter. This order is a necessary and proportionate step to protect the public and defend our values. That is, after all, the first duty of the state, and under this Government, nothing will matter more. With that, I commend this order to the House.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Dan Jarvis and Nusrat Ghani
Monday 31st March 2025

(3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Dan Jarvis Portrait Dan Jarvis
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I give the hon. and learned Member an absolute assurance that we work closely with all the devolved Governments on this matter. In fact, I was in Northern Ireland just recently to discuss this with the Justice Minister. The work that we are conducting as part of the taskforce is cross-party and designed to ensure that we do everything we possibly can to prevent interference in our democratic processes. We take the matter seriously, and we will work with others on it.

Matt Vickers Portrait Matt Vickers (Stockton West) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I realise that my hon. Friend the Member for West Suffolk (Nick Timothy) was unable to get a meaningful answer, but with Islamist extremism behind three quarters of MI5’s caseload, it is essential to shield our democracy from its pressure. The Minister has repeatedly reiterated the Government’s non-engagement policy with the Muslim Council of Britain, despite a Government Minister attending its annual dinner. More recently, there have been concerns about attendees at Government events who have publicly expressed some frightening views. Will the Minister assure the House that the Government remain committed to a non-engagement policy with those who seek to promote extreme views that undermine our democracy? Where Government Ministers go against that, how does the defending democracy taskforce respond?