Jeffrey M Donaldson Portrait

Jeffrey M Donaldson

Independent - Former Member for Lagan Valley

First elected: 1st May 1997

Left House: 30th May 2024 (Dissolution)


DUP Westminster Leader
30th Jun 2021 - 29th Mar 2024
Veterans Advisory and Pensions Committees Bill
8th Mar 2023 - 15th Mar 2023
Shadow DUP Spokesperson (Business in the House of Commons)
8th May 2015 - 30th Jun 2021
DUP Chief Whip
8th May 2015 - 17th Dec 2019
Shadow DUP Spokesperson (Defence)
8th May 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Shadow DUP Spokesperson (Equality)
1st Jun 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Shadow DUP Spokesperson (Defence)
1st Jun 2007 - 30th Mar 2015
Shadow DUP Spokesperson (Energy and Climate Change)
1st Jun 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Committees on Arms Export Controls
12th Jul 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Committees on Arms Export Controls (formerly Quadripartite Committee)
12th Jul 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Defence Committee
12th Jul 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Shadow Spokesperson (Transport)
1st Jun 2009 - 1st Jun 2010
Shadow Spokesperson (Home Affairs)
1st Jun 2007 - 1st Jun 2010
Transport Committee
9th Nov 2009 - 6th May 2010
Members' Allowances
18th May 2009 - 6th May 2010
Transport Committee
4th May 2004 - 12th Jul 2007
Shadow Spokesperson (International Development)
1st Jun 2005 - 1st Jun 2007
Shadow Spokesperson (Transport)
1st Jun 2005 - 1st Jun 2007
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee)
7th Jun 2001 - 25th Oct 2005
Statutory Instruments (Select Committee)
16th Jul 2001 - 24th Oct 2005
Regulatory Reform
16th Jul 2001 - 12th Jul 2005
Shadow Spokesperson (Education)
1st Jun 2004 - 1st Jun 2005
Shadow Spokesperson (Defence)
1st Jun 2004 - 1st Jun 2005
Shadow Minister (Defence)
1st Jun 2002 - 1st Jun 2003
Shadow Minister (Work and Pensions)
1st Jun 2001 - 1st Jun 2003
Shadow Spokesperson (Trade and Industry)
1st Jun 2002 - 1st Jun 2003
Shadow Spokesperson (Treasury)
1st Jun 2001 - 1st Jun 2002
Shadow Spokesperson (Communities and Local Government)
1st Jun 2001 - 1st Jun 2002
Shadow Spokesperson (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
20th Apr 2011 - 1st Jun 2002
Transport Sub-committee
14th Jun 2000 - 1st Jun 2001
Environment, Transport & Regional Affairs
12th Jun 2000 - 1st Jun 2001
Northern Ireland Affairs Committee
28th Jul 1997 - 12th Jun 2000
Shadow Spokesperson (Trade and Industry)
1st Jun 1997 - 1st Jun 2000


Division Voting information

Jeffrey M Donaldson has voted in 1821 divisions, and 34 times against the majority of their Party.

13 Oct 2020 - Fisheries Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 4 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 331
23 Sep 2020 - PUBLIC HEALTH - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 4 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 6
23 Sep 2020 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 4 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 6
5 Feb 2020 - Transport - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 311
19 Jun 2019 - Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 132
19 Jun 2019 - Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 117
19 Apr 2017 - Technical and Further Education Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 182
7 Mar 2017 - Children and Social Work Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 4 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 299
3 Feb 2016 - Tax Avoidance and Multinational Companies - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 4 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 261
14 Sep 2015 - Trade Union Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 284
8 Sep 2015 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 311
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 305
12 Feb 2014 - Public Bodies - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 203
4 Sep 2013 - Energy Prices and Profits - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 290
17 Jul 2013 - Managing Risk in the NHS - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 212
6 Feb 2013 - Canterbury City Council Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 4
9 Jan 2013 - Pub Companies - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 311
17 Dec 2012 - Growth and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 231
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 6 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 198
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 6 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 198
31 Jan 2012 - Local Government Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 6 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 227
18 Jan 2012 - Local Government Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 318
18 Jan 2012 - Local Government Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 318
25 Oct 2011 - Public Bodies Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 224
14 Sep 2011 - Energy Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 5 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 229 Noes - 300
11 Jul 2011 - European Union Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 212
11 May 2011 - Education Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 304
16 Mar 2011 - Environmental Protection - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 20
18 Oct 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 6 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 346
13 Oct 2010 - Public Houses and Private Members’ Clubs (Smoking) Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 141
13 Oct 2010 - London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order) - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 2 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 21
7 May 2008 - South West Regional Spatial Strategy - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 3 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 196
24 May 2021 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted No - against a party majority - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes vs 7 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 358
8 Nov 2021 - Environment Bill - View Vote Context
Jeffrey M Donaldson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Democratic Unionist Party Aye votes vs 1 Democratic Unionist Party No votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 162
View All Jeffrey M Donaldson Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
(59 debate interactions)
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
(40 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Northern Ireland Office
(383 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(156 debate contributions)
Ministry of Defence
(75 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Jeffrey M Donaldson's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Jeffrey M Donaldson

1st February 2024
Jeffrey M Donaldson signed this EDM as the primary signatory on Thursday 1st February 2024

250th anniversary of Friends’ School Lisburn

Tabled by: Jeffrey M Donaldson (Independent - Lagan Valley)
That this House warmly congratulates Friends’ School Lisburn on reaching their 250th anniversary in 2024; notes the unveiling of their inspirational legacy projects, which include a new book about the school, its historic Quaker ethos and fantastic record of academic achievement, and the development of an amazing outdoor performance space …
8 signatures
(Most recent: 19 Feb 2024)
Signatures by party:
Democratic Unionist Party: 6
Independent: 1
Alliance: 1
8th January 2024
Jeffrey M Donaldson signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 9th January 2024

Pension restitution for women born in the 1950s

Tabled by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside)
That this House welcomes the positive interventions from so many hon. Members from across the House on behalf of women born in the 1950s who have suffered pensions loss through the targeting of their pension rights; pays tribute to constituents and campaigners in their ongoing fight for justice; recalls that …
98 signatures
(Most recent: 16 Apr 2024)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 39
Scottish National Party: 31
Independent: 11
Democratic Unionist Party: 6
Plaid Cymru: 3
Social Democratic & Labour Party: 2
Alba Party: 2
Liberal Democrat: 2
Green Party: 1
Alliance: 1
Conservative: 1
Workers Party of Britain: 1
View All Jeffrey M Donaldson's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Jeffrey M Donaldson, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


2 Urgent Questions tabled by Jeffrey M Donaldson

Jeffrey M Donaldson has not been granted any Adjournment Debates

2 Bills introduced by Jeffrey M Donaldson


The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to amend the definitions of victims and survivors for the purposes of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, the Victims and Survivors (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 and related legislation; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 16th July 2013

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to impose a duty on the devolved administrations to report annually on the Military Covenant and the effects of membership, or former membership, of the armed forces on service people; and for connected purposes

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 2nd November 2011

Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
4 Other Department Questions
15th Mar 2018
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what plans she has to amend the Gender Recognition Act 2004 to permit children under the age of 18 to change their gender without parental consent.

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 is the piece of legislation that enables people to apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate, and thereby gain legal recognition of their gender. Legal gender recognition is entirely separate from any medical treatment an individual may receive to change their gender.

In July 2017, we announced our intention to consult on reforming the Gender Recognition Act 2004. We are currently considering the content of the consultation, and we will be publishing the consultation in due course. The Government recognises that there are a wide range of views on reforming the Act and we are taking time to engage with stakeholders in advance of the consultation to understand these views in more detail.

Any reforms that we might take forward relating to the age limit for applying for a Gender Recognition Certificate, will not affect when an individual can access medical treatment. Surgery is not offered for children and adolescents, and we have no intention of changing this.

Victoria Atkins
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
26th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many export licences have been issued to UK companies selling military equipment to the Ukrainian armed forces in the last two years.

Seven licences have been granted to UK companies for military-rated items in the last two years where the end-user was named as the armed forces, national guard or MOD of Ukraine.

A further three licences have been granted for supply of components or technology to end users, for the development or production of goods, for ultimate supply to the armed forces/national guard/MOD of Ukraine.

26th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the effect on UK trade of plans to establish a Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific.

The proposed Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) by member countries of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) represents the latest in a wave of potential deals covering large portions of global trade. Such deals, once concluded and implemented, would provide a stimulus not just to the countries concerned, but globally. Some of the benefits, especially from any simplification of rules and behind the border barriers, would be enjoyed by those British companies present in the region or reliant on extended supply chains. Moreover, keeping the trade liberalisation agenda moving forward is important: regional trade deals may lead to a greater willingness and ability to liberalise at a multilateral level, or bilaterally with the EU.

4th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, for what reasons Northern Ireland has been excluded from the Warm Home Discount Scheme; and if he will amend this Scheme to extend its remit to Northern Ireland.

Fuel poverty is devolved to the Northern Ireland Executive, which decides its own fuel poverty objectives and policies. For example, the Department for Social Development offers energy efficiency improvement schemes for low income households through the Warm Homes Scheme, Boiler Replacement Scheme and the recently launched Affordable Warmth Scheme. There are no plans to extend the remit of the Warm Home Discount to Northern Ireland.

18th May 2020
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what progress the Government has made in negotiations with the EU on the practical arrangements to implement the Northern Ireland Protocol of the EU Withdrawal Agreement; and if he will make a statement.

On 20 May 2020, the UK Government set out our approach to implementing the Northern Ireland Protocol in the Command Paper ‘The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol’. We are committed to meeting our obligations under the Protocol and, as we do, our priority remains protecting Northern Ireland’s place in our United Kingdom, and preserving the huge gains from the peace process and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement.

The EU published a technical note on the implementation of the Protocol on Ireland / Northern Ireland on 30th April, which can be found on the Commission’s website here.

The first meeting of the Specialised Committee on Northern Ireland took place on 30 April, following the first meeting of the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee.

We stand ready to work with the EU in a constructive and collaborative spirit, building on our initial engagements in the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee and Ireland/Northern Ireland Specialised Committee.

18th May 2020
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish details of the EU's proposals on the practical arrangements to implement the Northern Ireland Protocol of the EU Withdrawal Agreement on checks on goods travelling from Great Britain to Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement.

On 20 May 2020, the UK Government set out our approach to implementing the Northern Ireland Protocol in the Command Paper ‘The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol’. We are committed to meeting our obligations under the Protocol and, as we do, our priority remains protecting Northern Ireland’s place in our United Kingdom, and preserving the huge gains from the peace process and the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement.

The EU published a technical note on the implementation of the Protocol on Ireland / Northern Ireland on 30th April, which can be found on the Commission’s website here.

The first meeting of the Specialised Committee on Northern Ireland took place on 30 April, following the first meeting of the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee.

We stand ready to work with the EU in a constructive and collaborative spirit, building on our initial engagements in the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee and Ireland/Northern Ireland Specialised Committee.

5th Sep 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what plans she has to support events in Great Britain to mark the centenary of Northern Ireland in 2021.

The Northern Ireland Office has lead responsibility within Government for exploring options to mark the centenary of Northern Ireland in 2021. My Department will work alongside the NIO, where appropriate, to support that work.

5th Sep 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what plans he has to increase support for motor sports in the UK; and if he will make a statement.

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
15th Jan 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps have been taken by the Government in response to the recommendation in paragraph 6.7 of the Council of Europe Resolution 2036 (2015) on encouraging the media to avoid negative stereotyping and communicating prejudices against Christians, in the same way as for any other group.

Inciting religious hatred is a crime and the government will not tolerate hate speech against any religion or community. There is a robust regulatory framework in place for broadcasting enforced by Ofcom, the independent communications regulator. Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code makes clear that, unless justified by the context, content which includes hate speech or derogatory material in regards to any individuals, groups, religions or communities must not be included in TV or radio broadcasts. With regard to written media, the government is committed to a free and independent press and does not interfere with what is published, as long as the press abides by the law, including laws against hate speech.

21st Nov 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans the Government has to ratify the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage; what discussions she has had with Cabinet colleagues on that ratification; and if she will make a statement.

Government remains committed to reconsidering the case for ratification of the 2001 Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage. A decision on timescales for reviewing the Convention will be made in late Spring 2017.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans his Department has to mark the centenary of the Gallipoli campaign in the First World War.

On 14 November 2014 the Prime Minster announced three key events to mark the Centenary of the Gallipoli Campaign and honour the fallen, who so bravely fought for their nations.

The Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cape Helles Memorial in Turkey will host a UK-led Commonwealth and Ireland ceremony on 24 April 2015. On 25 April 2015 the National Commemoration of the Centenary of the Gallipoli Campaign and Anzac Day, a special centenary event led by the UK Government, will be held at the Cenotaph in London. On 6 August 2015 the National Museum of the Royal Navy, Portsmouth will host an event based upon the refurbished HMS M33, the last surviving ship from the campaign.

I am extremely honoured to be part of such celebrations of immense bravery. This Government and DCMS is committed to marking the centenary of the Gallipoli campaign in the First World War with respect uppermost in our minds.

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
24th Sep 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will take steps to ensure that an equitable system is in place for schools and students in the event that a predicted grade exam results system is introduced for exams in (a) October and November 2020 and (b) later in the 2020-21 academic year.

There are no plans to introduce a predicted grade results system in England for exams in the 2020-21 academic year. Exams and assessments are the best and fairest way of judging students’ performance, and we are clear in our intention that both the autumn and summer exam series should go ahead.

Most students taking exams in the autumn series received a centre assessment grade, based on an assessment of the likely grades that students would have obtained had exams gone ahead, or a calculated grade if that was higher. There is, therefore, no basis on which to award a different grade other than the student sitting the exam. Some students, for example some home-educated students, were not in a position to provide sufficient evidence for them to be able to receive a grade in the summer, and it remains the case that there would be insufficient evidence to award grades to those students unless they sit exams.

We continue to discuss arrangements for exams in summer 2021 with Ofqual, the exam boards, higher and further education representatives and other sector bodies to ensure that arrangements are fair and the 2021 cohort of students receive the qualifications they deserve.

The arrangements for awarding qualifications to students in Northern Ireland are a matter for the Northern Ireland government and the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment Regulation.

24th Sep 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to address the concerns of schools who state that the Centre Assessed Grades at GSCE and A level allocated to them were fair and balanced in contrast to other schools where predicted grades were inflated and resulted in a skewing of the overall results.

All centre assessment grades in England were signed off by head teachers or college principals who confirmed that they honestly and fairly represented the grades that these students would have been most likely to achieve if they had sat their exams as planned.

Following the release of A level results based on calculated grades, it became clear that there were far too many inconsistent and unfair outcomes for students. The Department agreed with Ofqual that grades for A levels and GCSEs should be awarded to students in England on the basis of students’ centre assessment grades or their calculated grades, whichever was higher. The Department believes this to be the fairest approach in the exceptional circumstances of this year, to avoid some students in England receiving grades that did not reflect their prior performance.

There was scope for schools to appeal where they believed that there had been errors of process, and students could also raise complaints if they had evidence of bias or discrimination. Schools have also been able to enter candidates for the exceptional autumn series to sit exams if they remain dissatisfied with their result.

The approach taken in Northern Ireland this summer was a matter for the Northern Ireland government and the Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment Regulation.

4th Sep 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of (a) exam boards and (b) the A level system; and what plans he has to compensate students that have been disadvantaged as a result of the leaking of exam papers by (i) exam boards and (ii) education providers.

It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

15th Jan 2018
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps have been taken by the Government in response to the recommendation in paragraph 6.2.3 of the Council of Europe Resolution 2036 (2015) on respecting the right of parents to provide their children with an education in conformity with their religious or philosophical convictions, while guaranteeing the fundamental right of children to education in a critical and pluralistic manner in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights, its protocols and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Education is a devolved matter and therefore any steps taken in response to the Council of Europe Resolution 2036 are a matter for the relevant devolved administration.

With regard to England, schools with a religious character make up a third of all state- funded schools and parents have a large degree of choice over how they can provide their children with an education in line with their own beliefs.

The government also firmly believes in the importance of religious education. Good quality religious education can develop children’s knowledge of the values and traditions of Britain and other countries, and foster understanding among different faiths and cultures. That is why it remains compulsory for all state funded schools in England and Wales, including academies and free schools, at all key stages. Parents also have the right to ask for their child to be withdrawn for religious education.

Religious education is part of schools’ activity to meet their legal duty to promote young people’s spiritual, moral and cultural development. We expect all schools to promote fundamental British values, and that includes encouraging mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs.

25th Nov 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, with reference to the Answer of 3 May 2016 to Question HL8119, what (a) her policy is on and (b) criteria will be used to allocate the £300 million for failing schools.

Our ambition remains that all schools should benefit from the freedom and autonomy that academy status brings. Our focus is on building capacity in the system to enable schools to convert voluntarily. We will also continue to convert all schools that are judged inadequate by Ofsted so they can benefit from the support of a strong sponsor.

It is important to be clear that the funding referred to in the previous answer is not solely for failing schools. As set out in our original response, it is funding that has been made available to support all schools converting to academy status, including failing schools.

The criteria for allocating pre-opening funding to converting schools is well established and remain unchanged. Voluntary converters receive £25,000 in order to contribute to the cost of conversion. Sponsored converters receive between £70,000 and £150,000, depending on the type of school and level of failure.

8th Nov 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what Government policy is on the establishment of Initial Teacher Training Centres of Excellence.

The Government has not designated any Centres of Excellence in Initial Teacher Training, and therefore there are no established criteria. We intend to engage with the Initial Teacher Training sector to discuss the possible designation of Centres of Excellence in future, building on the proposal set out in the White Paper earlier this year.

Details about the methodology used for allocating training places for the 2017/18 academic year can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/itt-requesting-places-and-allocations-methodology-2017-to-2018. We expect to publish the full allocations made to providers for 2017/18 later this year.

8th Nov 2016
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she expects to announce the names of the institutions that have been chosen to become Initial Teacher Training Centres of Excellence; and when the next round of selections will take place.

The Government has not designated any Centres of Excellence in Initial Teacher Training, and therefore there are no established criteria. We intend to engage with the Initial Teacher Training sector to discuss the possible designation of Centres of Excellence in future, building on the proposal set out in the White Paper earlier this year.

Details about the methodology used for allocating training places for the 2017/18 academic year can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/itt-requesting-places-and-allocations-methodology-2017-to-2018. We expect to publish the full allocations made to providers for 2017/18 later this year.

26th Apr 2023
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether she has sought legal advice on (a) the extent to which Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No.1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on Shipments of Waste will be binding on movements of waste from Great Britain for processing by companies based in Northern Ireland under the Protocol as amended by the Windsor Framework, (b) the date on which those requirements would come into effect, (c) the extent to which obligations will fall on those sending waste from Great Britain to Northern Ireland under the Regulation and (d) the extent to which obligations will fall on waste processing companies in Northern Ireland receiving the waste from Great Britain under the Regulation.

Defra officials are working with colleagues across Government on the implementation of the Windsor Framework, including with regard to movements of waste. We will update businesses on the implications as soon as possible.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the cost to the public purse has been of the establishment and operation of the Movement Assistance Scheme (a) between 1 January 2021 and 21 November 2022, (b) prior to 1 January 2021 and (c) in each six-month period between 1 January 2021 and 21 November 2022.

The Movement Assistance Scheme has cost £18.08m up to 30 September 2022. This comprises of £3.53m in the 2020/2021 Financial Year, £9.78m in 2021/2022 Financial Year and £4.77m in the 2022/2023 Financial Year. These are the most up to date figures currently available.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the scope of costs recoverable under the Movement Assistance Scheme have been constrained by state aid provisions applicable to Northern Ireland under the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The Movement Assistance Scheme only supports trade in agri-food goods within the UK internal market; this is the main factor determining whether costs can be included in scope of the scheme. The scheme therefore avoids constraints arising from the state aid provisions in the Northern Ireland Protocol.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the total cost to the public purse has been of developing the Digital Assistance Scheme to support the movement of agri-food goods and live animals from Great Britain to Northern Ireland as of 21 November 2022.

A total of £27.66m, as detailed in the table below, has been spent to date on development of the Digital Assistance Scheme.

Type of Spend

FY 2020-21
£m

FY 2021-22
£m

FY 2022-23*
£m

Total

DAS Programme and Staff Costs

0.25

5.94

7.36

13.55

DAS Capital Costs

3.20

7.79

3.12

14.11

Total

3.45

13.73

10.48

27.66

*Spend to October 2022. A number of actuals remain outstanding.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether certification under the proposed Digital Assistance Scheme will include (a) customs and (b) sanitary and phytosanitary declarations.

We are currently in the process of phased testing for the first stage of the delivery of the Digital Assistance Scheme (DAS). It will include sanitary and phytosanitary declarations. We expect the first phase of DAS involving Export Health Certificates for Products of Animal Origin to be delivered next year. Additional development phases of DAS are planned to include the movement of live animals, phytosanitary certifications and interfaces with customs systems in order to achieve a simplified process for generating documentation. The DAS is a Government-funded programme that aims to simplify the process for movement of goods to Northern Ireland or onward to the Republic of Ireland that require certification.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Affairs, what the total cost to the public purse was of developing points of entry for agri-food goods in Northern Ireland (a) between 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2021 and (b) between 1 January 2021 and 21 November 2022.

DAERA reported in August 2022 that a total of £15.3 million capital, £16.4 million resource and £1.7 million depreciation has been expended on the provision of the infrastructure, IT systems and personnel for the work necessary to carry out the required SPS checks at Northern Ireland's Points of Entry as a result of the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the total cost to the public purse has been of recruiting and training veterinarians to fulfil the requirements of the Northern Ireland Protocol since 1 January 2020.

DAERA reported in August 2022 that a total of £15.3 million capital, £16.4 million resource and £1.7 million depreciation has been expended on the provision of the infrastructure, IT systems and personnel for the work necessary to carry out the required SPS checks at Northern Ireland's Points of Entry as a result of the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol.

21st Nov 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the total cost to the public purse has been of establishing and administering the Scheme for Temporary Agri-Food Movements to Northern Ireland (STAMNI) as of 21 November 2022.

The information requested is not held centrally and to obtain it would incur disproportionate costs.

20th May 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to (a) ensure that farmers remain competitive in the UK market and (b) prevent the importation of cheap food products that do not meet UK food standards after the end of the transition period.

The Government is in regular dialogue with the food and farming industry in all parts of the UK as we forge ahead in our negotiations with the EU and other trading partners. We want a productive, profitable, resilient farming sector that is empowered to produce more of the high-quality food that is prized around the world and appreciated so much at home.

The UK is justly proud of its world-leading standards of food safety, animal welfare and environmental protection. These are the high standards British consumers expect from the food they eat and the high standards our hardworking farmers will continue to deliver. The Government’s manifesto made clear that we will not compromise on these high standards.

Our priority is a productive, competitive farming sector – one that will support farmers to provide more home grown food produced to higher environmental and animal welfare standards. The Government has committed to a serious and rapid examination of what could be done through labelling in the UK market to promote these high standards and high welfare goods.

Defra is working closely with the devolved administrations to agree the common frameworks that we will need for those returning EU powers that intersect with Devolved competence. The set of principles agreed at the Joint Ministerial Committee for EU negotiations (JMC (EN)) in October 2017 guide Defra in the development of these frameworks. This includes enabling the function of the UK internal market.

At the end of the transition period, the Withdrawal Act will convert all EU standards into domestic law. This includes a ban on using artificial growth hormones in both domestic and imported products. Nothing apart from potable water may be used to clean chicken carcasses. Any changes to these standards would have to come before Parliament.

The Government has also committed to a rapid review and a consultation on the role of labelling to promote high standards of animal welfare.

18th May 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the arrangements for checks on the shipment of food or animal products from Great Britain to Northern Ireland under the Northern Ireland Protocol of the EU Withdrawal Agreement; and if he will make a statement.

As part of usual Government business, the Environment Secretary has regular discussions with Cabinet colleagues and members of the Northern Ireland Executive (NIE) on the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol, including the elements relating to the movements of agri-food and animal products.

On 20th May, we published the Command Paper, The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol (CP226).

We have always been clear that checks on live animals and agri-food will be needed for goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland, building on what already happens at ports like Larne and Belfast. The Government is taking this forward with the NIE. We want to ensure new administrative procedures are streamlined and do not affect the flow of trade. The engagement forum announced in the Command Paper will enable business to put forward proposals in this regard.

There will be no new regulatory checks or export declarations as goods leave Northern Ireland for Great Britain. The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol reaffirms the Government’s commitment, first set out in New Decade, New Approach, to legislate to guarantee unfettered access for Northern Ireland’s businesses to the whole of the UK internal market and will ensure that this legislation is in force for 1 January 2021.

18th May 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent discussions he has had with (a) Cabinet colleagues and (b) the Northern Ireland Executive on future arrangements for any checks on the shipment of food and animal products from Northern Ireland to Great Britain under Northern Ireland Protocol of the EU Withdrawal Agreement; and if he will make a statement.

As part of usual Government business, the Environment Secretary has regular discussions with Cabinet colleagues and members of the Northern Ireland Executive (NIE) on the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol, including the elements relating to the movements of agri-food and animal products.

On 20th May, we published the Command Paper, The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol (CP226).

We have always been clear that checks on live animals and agri-food will be needed for goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland, building on what already happens at ports like Larne and Belfast. The Government is taking this forward with the NIE. We want to ensure new administrative procedures are streamlined and do not affect the flow of trade. The engagement forum announced in the Command Paper will enable business to put forward proposals in this regard.

There will be no new regulatory checks or export declarations as goods leave Northern Ireland for Great Britain. The UK’s Approach to the Northern Ireland Protocol reaffirms the Government’s commitment, first set out in New Decade, New Approach, to legislate to guarantee unfettered access for Northern Ireland’s businesses to the whole of the UK internal market and will ensure that this legislation is in force for 1 January 2021.

26th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what discussions she has had with the Minister for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Northern Ireland Executive on the effect of the recent reduction in milk prices on dairy farmers.

The Secretary of State chairs regular meetings with the Devolved Administrations on issues of mutual interest. She has had an exchange of letters with the Minister for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Northern Ireland Executive in the context of preparation for Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 26th January.

Defra officials also maintain regular contact with their counterparts in the Devolved Administrations on a range of dairy issues.

7th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the relief effort in Syria.

To date, the UK has pledged £700 million in response to the humanitarian crisis in Syria and the region. Our support has reached hundreds of thousands of people across all 14 governorates of Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt, with food, access to water, medical relief, shelter and other relief items. The UK continues to spearhead efforts to improve the effectiveness of this international response, including lobbying for better UN leadership and increased in-country capacity.

7th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what security measures have been implemented on platforms at underground and mainline rail stations to protect the public from acts of violence or terrorism.

The Secretary of State regulates the national rail network in Great Britain, and other networks such as the London Underground, to provide appropriate protective security regimes against acts of terrorism. For reasons of security it is not appropriate to discuss these regimes in detail, but they require the implementation of a range of measures by industry which are adapted to the level of assessed threat and which can be varied according to the threat assessment at particular times. The measures directed by the Department are complemented by the counter terrorism activities of the British Transport Police (BTP). The BTP also undertake a full range of policing activities to protect those using our railways against wider criminal acts.

1st Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of reducing the national speed limit on rural roads.

The Department has provided guidance to traffic authorities in the Speed Limit Circular 01/2013- Setting Local Speed Limits. This encourages traffic authorities to keep speed limits under review, and to consider lower speed limits than the default, especially where there may be a relatively high number of bends, junctions or accesses.

Consideration of collision history, road function, mix of road users including presence of vulnerable road users, road geometry, engineering and environment, and actual traffic speed should enable traffic authorities to determine the appropriate limit on rural roads.

26th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what discussions he has had with the Association for Project Safety on revisions to the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007; and if he will make a statement.

I have had no such discussions with the Association for Project Safety (APS). The Health and Safety Executive, however, has had extensive discussions with APS about proposals to revise the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 before, during and following its public consultation on these proposals earlier this year.

22nd Sep 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made with Cabinet colleagues of the number of cases of domestic abuse and coercion connected with the home use of early medical abortion pills since March 2020.

The Department recognises safeguarding as an essential aspect of abortion care and officials are working with the Domestic Abuse Commissioners Office to understand issues related to domestic abuse and coercion and home-use of early medical abortion (EMA).

All abortion providers are required to have effective arrangements in place to safeguard women and girls accessing abortion services who may be experiencing domestic abuse or coercion. Following Parliament’s decision to make provisions for at home early medical abortion to be made permanent from 30 August, the Department is ensuring that robust safeguarding systems and processes for home use of EMA are embedded in all abortion services.

Caroline Johnson
Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)
22nd Sep 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many women have required hospital treatment following the home use of early medical abortion pills since March 2020.

The information requested is not collected centrally.

Caroline Johnson
Shadow Minister (Health and Social Care)
19th Jan 2022
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether residents in Northern Ireland will participate in the PANORAMIC study of antiviral and antibody treatments for covid-19 announced by his Department on 8 December 2021.

Oral antiviral treatments are available through the PANORAMIC national study, run by the University of Oxford. The study is open to individuals across the United Kingdom. General practitioner practices in Northern Ireland are expected to begin contacting patients eligible to enrol in the PANORAMIC study directly to increase recruitment.

8th Mar 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what studies have been undertaken on the (a) side effects of Gardasil used in the HPV Vaccination programme and (b) the long term effect of Gardasil on the health of girls and young women.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), with advice from the Commission on Human Medicines, has closely evaluated the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine since the vaccination programme was first introduced in the United Kingdom in 2008 and since Gardasil has been in routine use from 2012. Extensive reviews of Gardasil vaccine safety have also been undertaken by other independent health bodies/authorities worldwide, including the European Medicines Agency, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. This continuous surveillance has found no evidence of serious harm or chronic illness caused by any HPV vaccine and is supported by published epidemiological studies from health authorities, including the MHRA and other independent academic researchers.

18th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many meetings the Government has had with the Care Quality Commission to monitor the evidence on the safety of abortion pills taken at home since 30 March 2020.

The Government has had four meetings with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to monitor the evidence on the safety of abortion pills taken at home since 30 March 2020.

The Department continues to closely monitor the impact of the temporary approval for women’s homes to be classed as a place where both sets of medication for early medical abortion can be taken up to 10 weeks gestation. Officials have regular meetings on abortion issues more generally at which the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the CQC and abortion service providers are present and the evidence on the safety of abortion pills taken at home may have been discussed at these meeting in addition to the meetings outlined.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
18th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in how many cases where both abortion pills have been taken at home since 30 March 2020 a woman received a scan to confirm the gestation of her pregnancy.

The Department does not hold this information centrally.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
18th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what changes in data collection requirements have been made for recording complications and maternal deaths for early medical abortions since 30 March 2020.

No changes in data collection requirements have been made for recording complications and maternal deaths for early medical abortions since 30 March 2020.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
18th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many women have taken two abortion pills at home (a) at the same time and (b) with an interval between the two since 30 March 2020.

The Department does not hold this information centrally.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
18th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many remote assessments for an early medical abortion have taken place since 30 March 2020 and how many have conducted by (a) telephone or mobile phone or (b) video call.

The Department does not hold this information centrally.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
16th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what procurement arrangements he is putting in place for businesses wishing to provide logistical support to the planned covid-19 vaccination programme.

The National Health Service is ready to deliver a COVID-19 vaccination programme as soon as it is authorised for use by the medicines’ regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. As part of the extensive planning, the NHS is working with all stakeholders, including the United Kingdom logistics industry, to be ready to mobilise when a vaccine becomes available. NHS England and NHS Improvement are utilising existing Crown Commercial Services and NHS procurement frameworks to identify suppliers for all goods and services required to support delivery of non-vaccine goods and services to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation’s cohorts.

16th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the publication on 1 October 2020 of supplementary analysis of the January-June 2020 abortion statistics, what gestation was reported on the notification form for each of the cases where abortion pills were taken after 10 weeks for (a) the 40 cases where the second pill only was taken at home and (b) the 10 cases where both pills were taken at home.

Further breakdowns of the provisional data by gestation and home use are not currently available as we are reviewing and assuring the underlying data in advance of the annual National Statistics publication in summer 2021.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
16th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the 27 December 2018 approval of the home of a pregnant woman in England who is undergoing treatment for termination of pregnancy as a class of place where the second stage of treatment for early medical abortion may be carried out, how many maternal deaths occurred under the 27 December 2018 approval as a result of the second abortion pill taken at home in (a) 2018, (b) 2019 and (c) 2020 to date.

It is not possible to identify the type of abortion performed from the mortality statistics. Mortality statistics published by the Office of National Statistics, show that for there was one death in 2018 where abortion was listed as the underlying cause of death on the death certificate. There were no deaths recorded in 2019. Data for 2020 is not available.

The Department is aware of reports of two women who died after seeking abortion treatment earlier this year. Both deaths have been appropriately investigated and in one case investigations are continuing. For the other case, the coroner concluded that there was no evidence to suggest the pregnancy or abortion contributed to the death either directly or indirectly. Both women attended an abortion service in person and based on information provided to the Department, at least one of these women was supplied with pills to take at home under the 2018 approval.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
16th Nov 2020
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many notification forms were received where the second abortion pill only was taken at home after 10 weeks, in 2019.

In 2019, the number of abortions where the Department was notified that prostaglandin was provided for home use is as follows:

- 52,309 at three to nine weeks gestation; and

- 37 at 10 weeks gestation and above.

The information presented is based on information contained in abortion notification forms (HSA4) submitted by clinics and hospitals to the Chief Medical Officer at the Department.

Helen Whately
Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions