Andrew Love

Labour (Co-op) - Former Member for Edmonton

First elected: 1st May 1997

Left House: 30th March 2015 (Retired)


Andrew Love is not a member of any APPGs
Treasury Committee
12th Jul 2005 - 30th Mar 2015
Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (Joint Committee)
16th Jul 2012 - 12th Jun 2013
Regulatory Reform
16th Jul 2001 - 12th Jul 2005
Public Accounts Committee
25th Jul 1997 - 11th May 2001


Division Voting information

Andrew Love has voted in 1600 divisions, and 12 times against the majority of their Party.

11 Jul 2012 - Sittings of the House - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 51 Labour No votes vs 141 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 184
30 Mar 2011 - Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 33 Labour Aye votes vs 170 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 37 Noes - 480
10 Feb 2011 - Voting by Prisoners - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 62 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 234 Noes - 22
15 Dec 2010 - Water Supplies (Developing World) - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 205 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 221
15 Jun 2010 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 53 Labour Aye votes vs 57 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 263
7 Apr 2010 - Digital Economy Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 23 Labour No votes vs 175 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 47
1 Jul 2009 - Parliamentary Standards Bill - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 239 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 250
3 Jul 2008 - Members’ Salaries - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 82 Labour Aye votes vs 136 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 196
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 184 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 418
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour Aye votes vs 177 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 392
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour Aye votes vs 157 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 267
1 Nov 2006 - Legislative Process - View Vote Context
Andrew Love voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 42 Labour Aye votes vs 218 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 354
View All Andrew Love Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
George Osborne (Conservative)
(68 debate interactions)
David Gauke (Independent)
(44 debate interactions)
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
(36 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
HM Treasury
(267 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(40 debate contributions)
Leader of the House
(27 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Andrew Love has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Andrew Love's debates

Edmonton Petitions

e-Petitions are administered by Parliament and allow members of the public to express support for a particular issue.

If an e-petition reaches 10,000 signatures the Government will issue a written response.

If an e-petition reaches 100,000 signatures the petition becomes eligible for a Parliamentary debate (usually Monday 4.30pm in Westminster Hall).

Andrew Love has not participated in any petition debates

Latest EDMs signed by Andrew Love

9th March 2015
Andrew Love signed this EDM on Wednesday 25th March 2015

FUNDING OF FURTHER EDUCATION COLLEGES

Tabled by: Barry Sheerman (Labour (Co-op) - Huddersfield)
That this House believes that further education colleges are central to improving the nation's skills; shares the concerns of those working and studying in further education regarding the recently announced 24 per cent cuts to non-apprenticeship adult education funding in England; recognises that this will have a devastating effect on …
63 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 25
Independent: 5
Democratic Unionist Party: 2
Conservative: 1
Green Party: 1
The Independent Group for Change: 1
18th March 2015
Andrew Love signed this EDM on Tuesday 24th March 2015

MEASURING THE COST OF LIVING

Tabled by: Frank Doran (Labour - Aberdeen North)
That this House believes that the Retail Price Index (RPI) remains the most accurate measure of the rise in the cost of living faced by UK workers; notes that over many decades the majority of pay bargaining in the UK has traditionally taken the RPI as its main reference point …
47 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 20
Independent: 2
The Independent Group for Change: 1
Green Party: 1
View All Andrew Love's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Andrew Love, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Andrew Love has not been granted any Urgent Questions

1 Adjournment Debate led by Andrew Love

Thursday 3rd July 2014

Andrew Love has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Andrew Love has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 19 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the five most common causes of infant mortality have been over the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.

28th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people have received funeral payments in (a) England, (b) London and (c) Enfield in each of the last 10 years; how much those payments amount to; and if he will make a statement.

Tables 1 and 2 show the number of Funeral Payment awards and expenditure amount in England, London and North and North East London Budget Area between 2004/05 and 2013/14.

DWP does not hold information about the number of people receiving Funeral Payment awards in a given time period. The number of awards made in each year is not equal to the number of people who received awards as an individual may have made multiple applications in that period.

The lowest geographical level at which we hold Funeral Payment data is by Social Fund Budget Area; the geographical areas used to administer the Social Fund in Great Britain. Since 2008/09, the Budget Area covering Enfield is North and North East London, which also covers Waltham Forest and Barking and Dagenham as well as parts of Barnet, Hackney, Haringey, Harrow, Havering, Islington and Redbridge. Earlier figures for this area are not available.

Table 1: Funeral Payment awards in England, London and North and North East London, 2004/05 to 2013/14

Year

England

London

North and North
East London

2004/05

34,700

4,800

-

2005/06

33,400

4,500

-

2006/07

32,700

4,300

-

2007/08

31,300

4,100

-

2008/09

32,500

4,200

800

2009/10

31,200

4,400

800

2010/11

30,500

3,800

800

2011/12

30,200

3,900

800

2012/13

28,000

3,600

900

2013/14

26,600

3,500

800

Source: DWP Policy, Budget and Management Information System


Table 2: Funeral Payment expenditure in England, London and North and North East London, 2004/05 to 2013/14

Year

England

London

North and North
East London

2004/05

£36,925,100

£5,961,200

-

2005/06

£36,643,600

£5,819,400

-

2006/07

£37,148,000

£5,814,900

-

2007/08

£36,987,600

£5,959,300

-

2008/09

£39,495,800

£6,511,000

£1,260,500

2009/10

£38,410,300

£6,769,600

£1,274,400

2010/11

£37,445,800

£5,879,700

£1,294,800

2011/12

£37,723,000

£6,226,400

£1,347,300

2012/13

£34,617,200

£5,590,100

£1,390,800

2013/14

£36,185,500

£5,979,600

£1,429,500

Source: DWP Policy, Budget and Management Information System

Notes

· These figures do not include applications which were processed clerically and have not been entered on to the Social Fund Computer System.

· All figures are rounded to the nearest £100.

11th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what information is required by his Department to allow the payment of universal credit into a credit union account; and if he will make a statement.

Universal Credit can currently be paid into a Credit Union current account and claimants would need to provide an individual account number and sort code. We plan to be in a position to make UC payments into any type of Credit Union account at a future date.

Esther McVey
Minister without Portfolio (Cabinet Office)
11th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what arrangements are in place to allow for the payment of universal credit to those without a bank or building society account; and if he will make a statement.

For those without a bank or building society, the Department can pay Universal Credit into a Credit Union current account, Post Office card account or by Simple Payment.

A Simple Payment is a cash transfer service, which has been designed to pay those people who DWP cannot pay into any type of account.

Esther McVey
Minister without Portfolio (Cabinet Office)
11th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what arrangements are in place to allow people who do not have access to a computer or the internet to claim universal credit; and if he will make a statement.

Support is available through our own Jobcentre network where we are introducing 6,000 additional web access devices to improve digital access by Autumn. Claimants can be given access to the internet through these devices to make a claim and support will be given where necessary if they are not familiar with digital services.

DWP already works in partnership with local authorities who can also provide digital access and digital support for claimants through existing outlets.

DWP also provides a telephony service to support those unable to use the digital channel.

Mark Harper
Secretary of State for Transport
6th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what discussions he has had with (a) NHS England and (b) clinical commissioning groups on hospital trusts using action plans to improve their National Cancer Patient Experience Survey results; and if he will make a statement.

The 2014 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), which is managed by NHS England, asked over 110,000 cancer patients across the country for their views on their care with 64% responding. Macmillan Cancer Support has published league tables constructed from the data. The tables can be found at:

http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Aboutus/News/Latest_News/Londontrustsremainatbottomofcancerpatientexperienceleaguetable.aspx

My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State meets with NHS England regularly and discusses a wide range of issues.

NHS England is working with NHS Improving Quality, Macmillan Cancer Support and Strategic Clinical Networks to spread good practice across hospitals providing cancer care, including how best to utilise CPES findings. Action includes:

- the launch of an NHS Improving Quality project that pairs highly-rated cancer trusts with trusts that have potential to improve;

- regional events for commissioners looking at how CPES results inform commissioning decisions around cancer patient experience;

- publication of guidance on using CPES data to drive improvement which will be sent to all Trusts who participate in the CPES.

NHS England committed in their Five Year Forward View to improving the information given to people who use services, their families and carers. This builds on NHS England’s Commitments to Carers, published in May 2014, with 37 commitments including NHS England supporting the relevant bodies in signposting carers to information and advice about available support.

NHS England also has a strand of work focusing on improving the quality, integrity and accessibility of health related information, including information targeting carers. In addition, NHS Choices holds a wide range of information relating to the support available for carers.

6th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what steps (a) his Department and (b) NHS England is taking to ensure the families of cancer patients are given the information needed to help care for them at home.

The 2014 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), which is managed by NHS England, asked over 110,000 cancer patients across the country for their views on their care with 64% responding. Macmillan Cancer Support has published league tables constructed from the data. The tables can be found at:

http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Aboutus/News/Latest_News/Londontrustsremainatbottomofcancerpatientexperienceleaguetable.aspx

My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State meets with NHS England regularly and discusses a wide range of issues.

NHS England is working with NHS Improving Quality, Macmillan Cancer Support and Strategic Clinical Networks to spread good practice across hospitals providing cancer care, including how best to utilise CPES findings. Action includes:

- the launch of an NHS Improving Quality project that pairs highly-rated cancer trusts with trusts that have potential to improve;

- regional events for commissioners looking at how CPES results inform commissioning decisions around cancer patient experience;

- publication of guidance on using CPES data to drive improvement which will be sent to all Trusts who participate in the CPES.

NHS England committed in their Five Year Forward View to improving the information given to people who use services, their families and carers. This builds on NHS England’s Commitments to Carers, published in May 2014, with 37 commitments including NHS England supporting the relevant bodies in signposting carers to information and advice about available support.

NHS England also has a strand of work focusing on improving the quality, integrity and accessibility of health related information, including information targeting carers. In addition, NHS Choices holds a wide range of information relating to the support available for carers.

6th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if his Department will publish a comparison of cancer patient experience between hospital trusts; and if he will make a statement.

The 2014 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), which is managed by NHS England, asked over 110,000 cancer patients across the country for their views on their care with 64% responding. Macmillan Cancer Support has published league tables constructed from the data. The tables can be found at:

http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Aboutus/News/Latest_News/Londontrustsremainatbottomofcancerpatientexperienceleaguetable.aspx

My Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State meets with NHS England regularly and discusses a wide range of issues.

NHS England is working with NHS Improving Quality, Macmillan Cancer Support and Strategic Clinical Networks to spread good practice across hospitals providing cancer care, including how best to utilise CPES findings. Action includes:

- the launch of an NHS Improving Quality project that pairs highly-rated cancer trusts with trusts that have potential to improve;

- regional events for commissioners looking at how CPES results inform commissioning decisions around cancer patient experience;

- publication of guidance on using CPES data to drive improvement which will be sent to all Trusts who participate in the CPES.

NHS England committed in their Five Year Forward View to improving the information given to people who use services, their families and carers. This builds on NHS England’s Commitments to Carers, published in May 2014, with 37 commitments including NHS England supporting the relevant bodies in signposting carers to information and advice about available support.

NHS England also has a strand of work focusing on improving the quality, integrity and accessibility of health related information, including information targeting carers. In addition, NHS Choices holds a wide range of information relating to the support available for carers.

1st Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many GP practices (a) closed and (b) opened in (i) England, (ii) Greater London and (iii) Enfield in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

The Health and Social Care Information Centre collect information on the number of practices opened and closed, which is contained in the attached table.

It is important to note that these figures also include practice mergers and takeovers and do not provide an accurate representation of activity or service provision. In many cases, practices listed in these figures as having closed, will have in fact merged and will continue to see patients. In addition, in this time period the definition of general practice has changed to become a more stringent classification.

1st Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the average GP list size was in (a) England, (b) Greater London and (c) Enfield in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

The requested information is contained in the following table:

Average GP practice list size by selected areas in England, 2009-2013

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

England

6,637

6,610

6,651

6,891

7,034

London Area
Team1

5,706

5,774

5,789

6,113

6,213

Enfield Clinical
Commissioning
Group1

4,775

4,667

4,904

5,617

5,798

Notes: 1 Workforce data is available by National Health Service organisation only, not geographical regions such as Greater London. Greater London is captured by London Area Team and Enfield by Enfield Clinical Commissioning Group. Prior to 2013, the area of London was serviced by London Strategic Health Authority and Enfield was serviced by Enfield Primary Care Trust. There is no break in the data as the old and new London organisations are coterminous and therefore the data is still comparable over the years provided.

As per the latest GP contract, patients register with a GP practice and are attributed to the practice, not a specific GP.

Data quality: The Health and Social Care Information Centre seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data, but responsibility for data accuracy resides with the organisations providing the data. Methods are continually being updated to improve data quality where changes impact on figures already published. This is assessed, but unless it is significant at national level, figures are not updated. Impact at detailed or local level is footnoted in relevant analyses.

Source: The Health and Social Care Information Centre General and Personal Medical Statistics. Patient registration information taken from National Health Application and Infrastructure Services Exeter GP payments system.

2nd Sep 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment he has made of the likelihood of use by Israeli forces of equipment containing UK components in breaches of international humanitarian law in the West Bank and Gaza Strip; and if he will make a statement.

We reviewed all existing export licences to Israel during Operation Protective Edge. We found that the vast majority of exports currently licensed for Israel were not for items that could be used by Israeli forces in operations in Gaza in response to attacks by Hamas.

On 12 August, the Government announced that twelve licences were identified for components which could be part of equipment used by the Israel Defence Forces in Gaza. As we were unable to clarify whether export licence criteria was being met, we took the decision to suspend this small number of export licences if there was a resumption of significant hostilities.

We monitored the situation closely and assessed that the resumption of hostilities when Hamas later broke the ceasefire was not enough to warrant a suspension.

4th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what representations he has made to his Israeli counterpart on the killing of two Palestinian teenagers at Ofer on 15 May 2014; and if he will make a statement.

Officials from our Embassy in Tel Aviv raised the use of lethal force in this case with both the Israel Defence Force and the Israeli Border Police on 16 May.

On 21 May, the local EU missions in Jerusalem and Ramallah issued a local statement expressing deep concern about the deaths of two Palestinian youths on 15 May in the West Bank and emphasising the importance of such incidents being investigated thoroughly. They reiterated the need for security forces, whether Israeli or Palestinian, to refrain from the use of lethal force, except in cases where there is a real and imminent threat to life.

21st Oct 2014
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will estimate the annual cost of providing the rent-a-room tax scheme if the threshold were raised (a) in line with rental inflation since 1997-98 and (b) to £7,500 per year; and if he will make a statement.

The Government has made no such assessment but keeps all tax policies under review.

17th Oct 2014
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the annual cost was of providing the rent-a-room tax scheme for each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have published information on estimates of the cost of the relief. For the year 2009-10, HMRC estimated the relief cost £120 million. For the years 2010-11 through to 2013-14 HMRC estimate the cost of the relief to be £90 million per annum.

These figures are particularly tentative and subject to a wide margin of error.

10th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on how many occasions UK military personnel have provided training in Colombia in each year since 2010; and how many such personnel provided that training in each such year.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 4 November 2014 to Question 210573 to the hon. Member for Bradford South (Mr Gerry Sutcliffe).

10th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on how many occasions Colombian armed forces personnel have trained in the UK in each year since 2010; and how many such personnel were trained in each such year.

Visits to the UK by members of the Colombian Armed Forces are focused around defence education. The number of occasions Colombian Armed Forces personnel has trained in the UK in each academic year since 2009-10 and how many such personnel were trained in each such year up to and including the end of the last academic year is:

2009-10: one individual on one occasion.

2010-11: five individuals on five separate occasions.

2011-12: one individual on one occasion.

2012-13: three individuals on three separate occasions.

2013-14: three individuals on three separate occasions

9th Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what estimate he has made of the amount of interest paid to private tenants from custodial tenancy deposit protection schemes in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.

The interest payments to tenants under the scheme are as follows:

2010: £418,681; 2011: £199,579; 2012: £120,288; 2013: £82,084; 2014: £59,184.

The falling figures reflect record-low interest rates, and also the changes that were made to the contract after 2010. If I may explain:

The service concession agreement that was agreed by Labour Government with the custodial tenancy deposit protection scheme contained a guarantee that the Government would meet any shortfall arising if approved fees were not covered by the interest on deposits held. If interests were low, then the Government would pay the scheme money.

As a result of the low interest rates that emerged due to the financial crash in 2008 and 2009, such an agreement left taxpayers liable for a massive shortfall, which was estimated to reach over £30 million by the end of the contract in 2012.

In May 2010, the Coalition Government inherited this unacceptable situation and looming liabilities for taxpayers. As outlined my rt. hon. Friend, the Member for Welwyn Hatfield (Grant Shapps) on 19 July 2011, Official Report, Column 828W, following extensive negotiations in summer 2010, we removed the guarantee and all associated liabilities as part of a revised agreement.

The Government is currently inviting bidders for the new custodial tenancy protection scheme contract for 2016 onwards, and we are asking bidders how and when they could offer tenants’ interest as part of their bids.

9th Mar 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department has taken to ensure that private tenants receive value for money held as deposits in custodial deposit schemes; and if he will make a statement.

The interest payments to tenants under the scheme are as follows:

2010: £418,681; 2011: £199,579; 2012: £120,288; 2013: £82,084; 2014: £59,184.

The falling figures reflect record-low interest rates, and also the changes that were made to the contract after 2010. If I may explain:

The service concession agreement that was agreed by Labour Government with the custodial tenancy deposit protection scheme contained a guarantee that the Government would meet any shortfall arising if approved fees were not covered by the interest on deposits held. If interests were low, then the Government would pay the scheme money.

As a result of the low interest rates that emerged due to the financial crash in 2008 and 2009, such an agreement left taxpayers liable for a massive shortfall, which was estimated to reach over £30 million by the end of the contract in 2012.

In May 2010, the Coalition Government inherited this unacceptable situation and looming liabilities for taxpayers. As outlined my rt. hon. Friend, the Member for Welwyn Hatfield (Grant Shapps) on 19 July 2011, Official Report, Column 828W, following extensive negotiations in summer 2010, we removed the guarantee and all associated liabilities as part of a revised agreement.

The Government is currently inviting bidders for the new custodial tenancy protection scheme contract for 2016 onwards, and we are asking bidders how and when they could offer tenants’ interest as part of their bids.