Oral Answers to Questions

Tom Brake Excerpts
Thursday 25th April 2013

(11 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering Portrait Miss Anne McIntosh (Thirsk and Malton) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

3. Whether he plans to review the arrangements for scrutiny of statutory instruments; and if he will make a statement.

Tom Brake Portrait The Deputy Leader of the House of Commons (Tom Brake)
- Hansard - -

The Government have no current plans to review the arrangements for scrutiny of statutory instruments.

Baroness McIntosh of Pickering Portrait Miss McIntosh
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am particularly disappointed by that reply. The House prides itself on scrutiny of legislation, but the weakness of the system is scrutiny of statutory instruments, whether to implement primary legislation or, more especially, to transpose EU directives into UK law. Will the Leader and Deputy Leader of the House please look carefully at allowing Members of Parliament not just to vote for or against a statutory instrument but to amend the very text of those instruments?

Tom Brake Portrait Tom Brake
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for that question. I know this is a matter that she has been pursuing vigorously. The issue with her proposal for statutory instruments is that the two Houses could end up amending a statutory instrument in different ways. There would then need to be a reconciliation process, very similar to a Bill handling process, so there are concerns about what she suggests. If she has not already done so, she may want to raise the matter with the Chair of the Procedure Committee.

Ann Coffey Portrait Ann Coffey (Stockport) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Cabinet Office used to give us the direct numbers of private ministerial offices. This year, we were given only the number of the main departmental switchboards. This week I had a very unhelpful experience when I tried to get some information about the progress of a regulation from a particular Department. Can—

Ann Coffey Portrait Ann Coffey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, the regulation was one that I was attempting to scrutinise the progress of, but I could not do so because of that unhelpful experience. Will the Deputy Leader of the House look into why we are no longer given the numbers of private ministerial offices, so that Members of Parliament such as me can do our jobs in scrutinising not only the regulations that are laid, but those that are about to be laid?

Tom Brake Portrait Tom Brake
- Hansard - -

I thank the hon. Lady for her question, which she related ingeniously to the issue of statutory instruments. I have heard her concerns and will ensure she gets a written response to her question.

The hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, representing the House of Commons Commission, was asked—
--- Later in debate ---
Barry Sheerman Portrait Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

5. What steps he is taking to ensure that the House of Commons facilitates the highest level of support to enable hon. Members to represent their constituents effectively.

Tom Brake Portrait The Deputy Leader of the House of Commons (Tom Brake)
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend the Leader of the House continues to work closely with colleagues on the House of Commons Commission to ensure that Members are fully supported by excellent staff and have the necessary facilities to carry out their duties effectively. As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, responsibility for day-to-day pay and allowances, including pay for MPs’ staff, is now a matter for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority.

Barry Sheerman Portrait Mr Sheerman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have raised this matter here before with the Leader of the House. The fact is that there is something deeply wrong with the way in which the House of Commons is being run at the moment. Many Members are dissatisfied with the withdrawal of many services across the piece, in Portcullis House and elsewhere. We also know that the good staff who serve us in our daily work and who do such a good job are totally disillusioned with the way in which this place is being managed. There is a management ethos that this place should be run as a business, but it is not a business. Because of the sittings and the hours, it can never be run as a business, so let us get back to its being run by dedicated staff who should be well treated and well looked after. We must ensure that we look after them because it is essential that we should be able to do our job for our constituents and for our country.

Tom Brake Portrait Tom Brake
- Hansard - -

I certainly agree that the House has excellent staff, and we should do everything we can to ensure that they continue to work effectively on our behalf. If the hon. Gentleman has concerns about a specific aspect of staffing, he might find it appropriate to raise the matter with the House of Commons Commission, from which I am sure he will get a suitably informed response.

Gerald Kaufman Portrait Sir Gerald Kaufman (Manchester, Gorton) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to the question from my hon. Friend the Member for Huddersfield (Mr Sheerman), may I draw to the Deputy Leader of the House’s attention the fact that the service desk in Portcullis House is no longer staffed? At whatever time of day one goes there for advice or to find out the location of a meeting room, there is no one there to help. I have consulted the police in Portcullis House several times, and they have been extremely helpful, but they do not always have the necessary information. I have therefore been seriously inconvenienced in the pursuit of my constituents’ interests, and I am not alone in that. Will the hon. Gentleman take action now to restore the staffing of the service desk in Portcullis House?

Tom Brake Portrait Tom Brake
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his question, but I must point out that that is not a ministerial responsibility. It is a matter for the House of Commons Commission, and I am sure that its representatives will be listening carefully to this exchange and that they will want to take suitable action.

Christopher Pincher Portrait Christopher Pincher (Tamworth) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

6. What plans he has to improve the quality of parliamentary scrutiny of Government expenditure.

--- Later in debate ---
Tom Brake Portrait The Deputy Leader of the House of Commons (Tom Brake)
- Hansard - -

The McKay commission reported on 25 March on how the House of Commons might deal with legislation that affects only part of the UK. This is a very important issue, which is why the Government asked this expert commission to look at it. The report makes a helpful contribution, and we will give it very serious consideration before responding substantively.

Harriett Baldwin Portrait Harriett Baldwin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I look forward to that response. I would like to know whether the Leader of the House intends to act on those proposals in the next Session of Parliament.

Tom Brake Portrait Tom Brake
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for that question. I know that she has pursued this matter vigorously in recent months. Clearly, the McKay commission has produced a serious report. It continues a menu of options and the Government will want to consider the recommendations very carefully before coming to any firm conclusions.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Time is against us, but I am determined to find time for the hon. Member for Harlow (Robert Halfon).