Lord Sikka Portrait

Lord Sikka

Labour - Life peer

Became Member: 10th September 2020


Lord Sikka is not a member of any APPGs
1 Former APPG membership
Environmental, Social, and Governance
Lord Sikka has no previous appointments


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Lord Sikka has voted in 80 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Lord Sikka Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
(20 debate interactions)
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
(10 debate interactions)
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
(8 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
HM Treasury
(25 debate contributions)
Department for Transport
(6 debate contributions)
Department for Work and Pensions
(6 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Sikka's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Sikka, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Sikka has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Sikka has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 28 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
6th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to extending the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to political parties in receipt of Short Money in respect of (1) their policy-making, and (2) their fundraising activities.

Registered political parties are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in respect of any of their functions.

Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the number and value of government contracts awarded to companies with criminal convictions.

For contracts awarded under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, this information is not collated centrally. Departments are responsible for making their own procurement decisions.

The Procurement Act 2023, which went live on 24 February, requires all suppliers bidding for public sector contracts to register via a central digital platform and declare any relevant convictions and exclusion information. The strengthened exclusions and new debarment provisions in the Act enable and, where appropriate, require the exclusion of suppliers convicted of relevant offences.

Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
27th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government when the Office for National Statistics will publish their latest data on winter deaths; what criteria they will use to calculate them; and whether they have any plans to return to a static reporting date.

The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.

Please see the letter attached from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority.

The Lord Sikka

House of Lords

London

SW1A 0PW

31 January 2025

Dear Lord Sikka,

As National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority, I am responding to your Parliamentary Question asking when the Office for National Statistics (ONS) will publish their latest data on winter deaths; what criteria they will use to calculate them; and whether they have any plans to return to a static reporting date (HL4448).

The ONS previously published a regular release on winter mortality in England and Wales. However, following the recent consultation on health and social care statistical outputs[1], this release has been paused to enable a review of the methodology and timeliness of the statistics to be completed. Once the review is complete, a proposal on the future status of this output will be published.

The ONS does publish regular statistics on deaths registered each week[2] which may be of interest to you. This includes deaths registered over the winter period as well as estimates of excess deaths using the methodology that was implemented in February 2024[3].

Yours sincerely,

Professor Sir Ian Diamond

[1]https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/health-and-social-care-statistical-outputs/outcome/health-and-social-care-statistical-outputs-consultation-response

[2]https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/previousreleases

[3]https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Baroness Twycross
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
6th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how many sub-postmasters wrongfully convicted because of flawed Horizon computer evidence are yet to have their convictions overturned, and to receive compensation.

All convictions which met the conditions of the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024 (and that were not overturned by the Courts prior to the legislation coming into effect) were overturned at the point of Royal Assent.

As of 28 February 2025, all 111 individuals on the Overturned Convictions scheme had received an interim payment, of which 68 individuals had reached a full and final settlement. On the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme, 407 individuals had received an interim payment, of which 273 individuals had reached a full and final settlement.[1]

[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/post-office-horizon-financial-redress-data-for-2025/post-office-horizon-financial-redress-data-as-of-28-february-2025

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what action has been taken, if any, against Gofer Mining Plc and its directors for failure to file annual accounts at Companies House since 2019.

His Majesty’s Government takes the failure of companies to file statutory accounts seriously.

Companies House routinely takes prosecution action against company directors who fail to file their company’s accounts. In addition, financial penalties are applied when accounts are delivered late. These actions are aimed at ensuring that companies meet their statutory obligations. Over 97% of companies meet their obligations to file statutory accounts.

Companies House are aware of concerns that have been raised about the highlighted company. Companies House will look into these matters further and, where necessary, take appropriate action.

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
28th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to investigate the affairs of Avis Capital Limited (Company number 10465466), given that it has reported that it is a dormant company which filed accounts with Company House indicating it had net assets of £58,155,255,471.

His Majesty’s Government takes allegations of suspicious company filings and any concerns raised seriously. As such, the Minister for Employment Rights, Competition and Markets has asked Companies House to investigate the allegations surrounding Avis Capital Limited.

Companies House are aware of concerns that have been raised about the highlighted company. Where such concerns are raised, Companies House will look into these matters further and, where necessary, take appropriate action.

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to remarks by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 29 January (HL Deb col 251), what is the breakdown of the £150 million in fines issued to water companies since 2015.

The Environment Agency prosecutes Water and Sewerage Companies (and the courts hand down fines) for environmental offences under the Environmental Permitting Regulations and other offences including polluting discharges to water and land, breaches of environmental permit conditions and obstruction of investigations.

Below is a breakdown of the 150 million in fines issued to water companies since 2015, as mentioned in Baroness Hayman of Ullock’s remarks on 29 January.

Water and Sewerage Company

Sum of Total Fine (£)

Anglian Water

£5,475,000.00

Northumbrian Water

£807,000.00

Severn Trent Water

£4,056,000.00

South West Water

£3,406,834.00

Southern Water

£92,024,000.00

Thames Water

£37,721,000.00

United Utilities Water

£2,816,000.00

Yorkshire Water

£4,678,750.00

Grand Total

£150,984,584.00

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the cost of acquiring control of England’s water companies.

The Government has no intention to nationalise water companies.

Nationalisation would put a huge burden on the public purse at a time when public finances are already stretched and would not fix the root of the problem.

If the whole industry was nationalised, shareholders and debt holders would need to be compensated, which could cost over an estimated £90 billion [this is based on Ofwat’s Regulatory Capital Value 2024 estimates]

Instead, this government is focused on tackling the public’s immediate concerns to clean up the nation’s polluted waterways and turn around the sector’s performance, focusing on improving the privatised regulated model.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government why Ofwat did not use actual gearing levels of water companies in its calculation of weighted average cost of capital for the 2024 pricing review.

In all of Ofwat's price determinations since privatisation, Ofwat has set the allowed return by reference to a notional capital structure. Ofwat uses a notional capital structure as it protects customers from bearing the risk of companies' actual financing decisions and it sets a signal to companies and investors on regulatory expectations about the allocation of risk within the capital structure. The use of the notional structure means it is companies and investors, rather than customers, that bear the risks of their capital and financing choices where the financing arrangements depart from the notional structure.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how Ofwat adjusted the regulatory capital value of each water company to take account of (1) capitalisation of interest payments, and repair and maintenance costs, and (2) intragroup debt and interest payments.

The Regulatory Capital Value (RCV) of a water company represents the net stock of investment that has been contributed by debt and investors over time in delivering their investment activities. This is used by Ofwat for the purposes of setting its regulatory determinations.

Ofwat calculates an efficient totex (total expenditure) allowance for each company, covering operating, maintenance, and enhancement costs. Totex is funded in one of two ways; pay-as-you-go expenditure funded through revenue allowances, or long-term investment funded through the RCV and run-off from the RCV over time. Pay-as-you-go expenditure generally reflects forecast operational costs. Capital costs are generally added to the RCV, with the RCV run-off allowance providing companies with a funding allowance for carrying out activities such as maintenance.

As the RCV represents only the net stock of investment for delivering investment activities, it takes no account of intragroup debt and interest payments. Ofwat set the allowed return for companies on the basis of a notional capital structure which makes no assumption about the need for intragroup debt and interest payments. Where such arrangements exist, these arrangements are not funded in the determinations that are set by Ofwat and are matters for companies and their investors.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
27th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the amount of fines paid by each of the water companies in each of the past five years.

We will not let companies get away with illegal activity and where breaches are found, the regulators will not hesitate to hold companies to account.

The Water (Special Measures) Bill will provide the most significant increase in enforcement powers to the regulators in a decade, giving them the teeth they need to take tougher action against water companies in the next investment period, which is due to start in April this year.

Details of the enforcement action taken against water companies by regulators are available on the relevant regulator’s websites.

Enforcement action by Drinking Water Inspectorate can be found on the DWI website.

Enforcement action by Ofwat can be found on the Ofwat website.

Enforcement action by the Environment Agency can be found on the EA website.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how many driving licences have been issued to individuals without an official proof of identity.

Since they were introduced in 1998, all applicants for a first photocard driving licence have been required to provide official evidence of identity.

Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Minister of State (Department for Transport)
5th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what was (1) the total amount paid out for each benefit administered by the Department for Work and Pensions, (2) the total monetary amount of alleged fraud for each benefit, (3) the total number of prosecutions in each case, and (4) the total amount recovered, in 2023–24.

Total estimates of benefit expenditure and estimates of fraud and error across all benefits can be found at: Fraud and error in the benefit system - GOV.UK

As outlined in DWP Annual Reports and Accounts 2023 to 2024 on page 103, there were 655 prosecutions but a breakdown by benefit is not available.

Debt Management Unit’s total recovery in 2023-24 amounted to £2.81 billion (excluding Housing Benefit recovered by local authorities but including £46 million Housing Benefit debt recovered by DWP), page 133 of the DWP Annual Reports and Accounts 2023 to 2024.

Baroness Sherlock
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
28th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what was the median state pension for (1) men, and (2) women, (a) before 2016, and (b) since 2016.

Information on amounts of State Pension by gender are available at DWP Stat-Xplore. The table below provides information on the Median State Pension amount for (i) people who reached State Pension age before 6th April 2016 and will get the basic State Pension and may get earnings-related additional State Pension, and (ii) those who reached State Pension age on or after 6th April 2016, who get the new State Pension. The information in the table below is based on the latest available quarter ending May 2024.

Median Weekly Pre-2016 SP (bSP) May 2024 (£)

Median Weekly Post-2016 SP (nSP) May 2024 (£)

Male

219.93

220.96

Female

191.04

220.53

Total

204.06

220.74

Baroness Sherlock
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
25th Jul 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Offord of Garvel on 13 May (HL Deb col 456), what were the titles of the cases prosecuted by the Department of Work and Pensions against postmasters in England and Wales, and in each case what was (1) the date of proceedings, (2) the location of the court, and (3) the outcome.

The Department is aware of 61 Post Office members of staff who were prosecuted by DWP between 2001 and 2006. Each of the cases involved welfare-related fraud offences. In most cases this involved encashment of stolen benefit payment order books. There is no evidence that any of the cases prosecuted by DWP relied on the Horizon system. They followed lengthy, complex investigations, relying on multiple sources of evidence.

Until 2012, DWP prosecuted its own cases. The cases were handled by DWP Solicitors who would instruct Counsel to represent DWP at Court. In March 2012, the prosecutorial function of the DWP was assigned to the Crown Prosecution Service.

In the early 2000’s the Department moved to paying benefits automatically into people’s bank accounts which significantly reduced the opportunity for benefit fraud, including potential offences by Post Office staff.

To assist, please find attached a table setting out the information the Department holds for each of the 61 cases. The information includes the date of conviction, the location of the court, and the sentence (outcome) for each of the 61 cases.

Baroness Sherlock
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
25th Jul 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to publish a list of the cases of sub-postmaster prosecutions which have been initiated by the Department of Work and Pensions between 1999 and 2018 and subsequently passed to the Crown Prosecution Service; and the outcome of each of those cases.

The Department is aware of 61 Post Office members of staff who were prosecuted by DWP between 2001 and 2006. Each of the cases involved welfare-related fraud offences. In most cases this involved encashment of stolen benefit payment order books. There is no evidence that any of the cases prosecuted by DWP relied on the Horizon system. They followed lengthy, complex investigations, relying on multiple sources of evidence.

Until 2012, DWP prosecuted its own cases. The cases were handled by DWP Solicitors who would instruct Counsel to represent DWP at Court. In March 2012, the prosecutorial function of the DWP was assigned to the Crown Prosecution Service.

In the early 2000’s the Department moved to paying benefits automatically into people’s bank accounts which significantly reduced the opportunity for benefit fraud, including potential offences by Post Office staff.

To assist, please find attached a table setting out the information the Department holds for each of the 61 cases. The information includes the date of conviction, the location of the court, and the sentence (outcome) for each of the 61 cases.

Baroness Sherlock
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
25th Jul 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Department of Work and Pensions has transcripts of court judgments and accompanying documents for all cases related to the prosecution of sub-postmasters that they have initiated.

Transcripts of court judgments are available upon application HMCT, DWP does not hold transcripts of court judgments. The DWP case files referred to in the question have been destroyed in line with data protection legislative requirements.

Baroness Sherlock
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government whether UK Crown Dependency and Overseas Territories permit incorporation of a company without official proof of identity of promoters, directors, and shareholders.

The Crown Dependencies (CDs) and Overseas Territories (OTs) are separate legal jurisdictions to the United Kingdom and responsible for their own domestic affairs including, in those CDs and OTs with provisions for financial services, the responsibility for regulation and company registry in their jurisdictions.

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 amends the Companies Act 2006 to mandate identity verification requirements for those setting up and controlling companies in the UK. This will apply to directors and PSCs (people with significant control) of existing companies and any new companies being incorporated. Companies registered in the CDs and OTs with a place of business or branch in the UK will also be required to have their directors and PSCs identities verified.

The UK Government is committed to working with international financial centres, including the CDs and OTs, to help tackle illicit finance, including increasing the transparency of their corporate beneficial ownership registers. The UK's ultimate expectation of the CDs and OTs remains fully public registers.

Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
6th Mar 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Vere of Norbiton on 5 February 2024 (HL1819), when Dame Linda Dobbs's review began; what period it covers; when the review was originally scheduled to be completed; when the review is now expected to be completed; when an interim report was published; and how many victims of fraud at HBOS and Lloyds Banking Group have given evidence to it.

The Dame Linda Dobbs Review began in April 2017. The review was originally scheduled to be completed by the end of 2020. It is now expected to be completed in 2025.

The review, and appointment of Dame Linda Dobbs, has been instigated by Lloyds Banking Group. No interim report is planned and the number of victims giving evidence has not been made public.

The review has stated it will cover the period from the acquisition of HBOS in 2009 to 2017, and examine relevant evidence from before 2009 to assess what ought to have been known at the time of the HBOS acquisition.

Once completed, the review’s findings will be shared with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which will then consider what action is appropriate to take.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the link between stamp duty rates and house prices.

Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is a transaction tax paid on the purchase of the property in England or Northern Ireland. A range of complex factors influence house prices in the UK.

On SDLT, the Office for Budget Responsibility publishes its assumptions on the relationship between SDLT and property prices.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish any correspondence they hold with Lloyds Bank related to frauds at the Reading branch of HBOS.

The Government regularly engages with a range of stakeholders across the financial services landscape, and it is important that communication can take place in a free and frank way.

The matter of HBOS Reading is first and foremost for the Financial Conduct Authority as the independent non-governmental body responsible for regulating and supervising the financial services industry, and is subject to an ongoing review being led by Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.

The most appropriate form of investigation is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority to determine. However, the Government notes that the regulator has already undertaken an investigation into this matter, in addition to the Cranston Review and, latterly, the work of Sir David Foskett to ensure adequate compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority will receive a copy of the Dobbs Report in due course and will be able to consider whether any further action is appropriate.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
24th Feb 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Vere of Norbiton on 5 February 2021 (HL1819), whether they will provide a reason why the Financial Conduct Authority has not launched an independent inquiry into banking fraud at HBOS and Lloyds Banking Group.

The Government regularly engages with a range of stakeholders across the financial services landscape, and it is important that communication can take place in a free and frank way.

The matter of HBOS Reading is first and foremost for the Financial Conduct Authority as the independent non-governmental body responsible for regulating and supervising the financial services industry, and is subject to an ongoing review being led by Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.

The most appropriate form of investigation is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority to determine. However, the Government notes that the regulator has already undertaken an investigation into this matter, in addition to the Cranston Review and, latterly, the work of Sir David Foskett to ensure adequate compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority will receive a copy of the Dobbs Report in due course and will be able to consider whether any further action is appropriate.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
25th Jul 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the recommendations of Lord Myners published in March 2001 in Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review will form part of their growth and productivity plans.

Institutional investment is vital for growth, and investment in starts ups and scale ups is an important part of that. The Myners Report contains valuable insights that are still valuable today. However, the pensions market in particular is now significantly different than it was in 2001. The Chancellor has launched a landmark pensions review which will focus on increasing investment, improving saver returns and tackling waste in the pensions system. This is alongside other major initiatives to drive economic growth such as the National Wealth Fund to mobilise private capital and institutional investment.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
28th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how many unexplained wealth orders were issued in each year since 2018; what was the value of the wealth involved; what amount was recovered; and how many prosecutions and convictions took place.

The Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) regime was introduced in the Criminal Finances Act 2017. The number of UWOs obtained, wealth involved (estimated value of assets secured and estimated value of assets recovered) and number of prosecutions and convictions is outlined below.

Year

Number of operations that obtained a UWO

Estimated Value of Assets secured

Estimated Value of Recovery Order obtained

Number of Prosecutions/ Convictions

2018

1

£30,000,000

£12,000,000

NIL

2019

3

£113,200,000

£10,000,000

2020

0

2021

0

2022

0

2023

1

£1,800,000

2024

1

£275,000

2025

1

£1,500,000

Total

7

£146,775,000

£22,000,000

It is important to note that a UWO is only an investigatory order into an asset. A number of the UWO investigations listed that have not resulted in civil recovery proceedings are ongoing investigations. Any property subject to a UWO can be frozen whilst under an investigation which disrupts criminal activity but the property itself cannot be recovered using a UWO, it must be recovered through subsequent civil recovery proceedings. Civil recovery proceedings apply to assets rather than individuals so require no prosecution or criminal conviction.

The Government publishes statistics annually on the number of UWOs applied for and obtained. The most recent report can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/unexplained-wealth-orders-2023-to-2024-annual-report/unexplained-wealth-orders-2023-to-2024-annual-report

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
27th Jan 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government how many corporations have been prosecuted and convicted for tax evasion under the Criminal Finances Act 2017.

The Ministry of Justice publishes data on prosecutions and convictions for a wide range of offences including for tax evasion under the Criminal Finances Act 2017 in the Outcomes by Offences data tool. This can be downloaded from the Criminal Justice Statistics landing page here: Criminal Justice Statistics.

Since its introduction, there have been no prosecutions or convictions of corporations for the following two specific tax evasion offences recorded under the Criminal Finances Act 2017 in England and Wales:

1) Relevant body fail to prevent facilitation of UK tax evasion; and,

2) Relevant body fail to prevent facilitation of foreign tax evasion offence.

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
12th Sep 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government how many people have been prosecuted under section 36 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 in each of the years since its inception; and what outcomes were achieved.

The Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings Database has not recorded any prosecutions under section 36 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 since its introduction.

Please see the offence group classification which lists the offences available to view in the Outcomes by Offence tool available via the following link: Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2023 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). This provides information on the number of prosecutions, convictions, sentences and sentence outcomes in England and Wales.

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)