Inquiry Publications Mar. 04 2022
Inquiry: AfghanistanFound: ˜ce ( AFG0001 )22 As the Rt Hon Dr Andrew Murrison MP, former Minister of State for the Middle East,
Written Evidence Dec. 07 2021
Inquiry: Government policy on AfghanistanFound: That being said, violence and threats towards humanitarian staff, assets and facilities is ongoing.
Found: Freeze on Afghan assets abroad Since the Taliban’s capture of Kabul, Afghan assets oversees, such as
Asked by: Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party - Argyll and Bute)
Question to the HM Treasury:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many assets of people belonging to the Daesh terror organisation have been frozen in the UK; what is being done with those assets; and what assessment he has made of the potential to repurpose the Daesh's frozen assets for reparations for victims of the Daesh atrocities.
Answered by John Glen - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office
There is currently around £85,000 worth of funds frozen in the UK belonging to individuals and organisations associated with ISIL and Al-Qaida. The majority of these individuals and organisations are sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council and appear on its ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions List. As this List concerns individuals and organisations with both ISIL and Al-Qaida affiliation, the UK has not attempted to make this delineation when reporting the value of frozen funds under this sanctions regime in the UK.
An asset freeze does not involve any change in ownership of funds or economic resources, or require funds or economic resources to be seized by the Government or Police. Accordingly, HM Treasury does not hold or own the assets of any sanctioned persons.
Instead, an asset freeze operates by preventing sanctioned persons from accessing either their own funds or receiving funds from others. HM Treasury alerts financial and other relevant institutions when individuals or organisations are sanctioned by the UN or the UK, and those institutions must then freeze the assets they hold. Anybody who contravenes these sanctions risks committing a criminal offence. The result is that the assets of sanctioned individuals and organisations are ‘frozen’.
The United Nations counter-terrorism sanctions regime was created by UN Security Council Resolution 1267 (1999) and first imposed sanctions on the Taliban. It has been amended and extended on numerous occasions, most notably to include Al-Qaida in 2000 (Resolution 1333(2000)), and ISIL (Da’esh) in 2015 (Resolution 2253(2015)), and is now governed by Resolution 2368 (2017). The aim of Resolution 2368 (2017) is to apply financial sanctions in order to prevent terrorists from raising, moving and using funds, and therefore to prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts. The UK is required to comply with its obligations pursuant to UN Security Council Resolutions as a matter of international law and therefore to implement all UN sanctions.
Once the conditions for delisting or unfreezing assets set out in UN Security Council Resolution 2368 of 2017 are met, relevant assets would no longer be frozen in the UK.
Financial sanctions legislation does not enable the Government to seize frozen ISIL assets, refuse the release of frozen assets or use ISIL assets frozen in the UK to provide reparations for victims of the Daesh atrocities.
Nov. 03 2021
Source Page: Cabinet Secretary for the Constitution, External Affairs and Culture correspondence: FOI releaseFound: Islamic law.
Found: Freezing fuel duty and duty rates on alcohol will also help with the cost of living.To help the most
Oct. 27 2021
Source Page: Autumn Budget and Spending Review 2021: documentsFound: Freezing fuel duty and duty rates on alcohol will also help with the cost of living.To help the most
Oct. 27 2021
Source Page: Autumn Budget and Spending Review 2021: documentsFound: Freezing fuel duty and duty rates on alcohol will also help with the cost of living.To help the most
Mentions:
1: Lord Clement-Jones (LDEM - Life peer) He has had his assets seized in state-enabled corruption. - Speech Link
2: Earl of Courtown (CON - Excepted Hereditary) While the imposition of sanctions is at the discretion of the Secretary of State, Her Majesty’s Government - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Stewart Hosie (SNP - Dundee East) It would see the rise of ISIL—Islamic State—which at one point would control a third of the territory - Speech Link
2: Theresa May (CON - Maidenhead) interpretation of Islamic law? - Speech Link
3: Caroline Nokes (CON - Romsey and Southampton North) interpretation of Islamic law? - Speech Link
4: Lisa Nandy (LAB - Wigan) We should be identifying any leverage we have: freezing the assets of the Afghan Government or central - Speech Link
5: Chris Bryant (LAB - Rhondda) Will the Secretary of State give way? - Speech Link
6: Zarah Sultana (LAB - Coventry South) Will the Secretary of State give way? - Speech Link