Information between 4th November 2025 - 24th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 153 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 152 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 155 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 71 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 69 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Shivani Raja voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Vaccination: Integrated Care Boards
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to delegate the commissioning of vaccination and immunisation services to integrated care boards from April 2026. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Hon. Member to the answer I gave on 29 September 2025 to Question PQ76374. |
|
Breastfeeding
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Thursday 13th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has allocated funding to (a) initiatives and (b) organisations that promote the use of the term chestfeeding. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department funds infant feeding services and support through the National Health Service, local authorities, and the National Breastfeeding Helpline. We want all families to be able to achieve their infant feeding goals, regardless of their circumstances, and infant feeding support and advice should be available to anyone who needs it. |
|
Blood: Donors
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when his Department last reviewed NHS Blood and Transplant’s donor eligibility policy on the use of unlicensed injectable substances. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The safety of blood is of the upmost importance. The Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 mandate permanent deferral from blood donation for anyone with a history of non-prescribed intravenous or intramuscular drug use, with further information available in the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005, at the following link: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/50/schedule/part/3/paragraph/2n3 The Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs, which provides expert advice to all the United Kingdom’s governments, conducted a full review of the donor selection criteria in 2017. This includes the use of unlicensed injectable substances. The Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services’ Professional Advisory Committee provides expert guidance to the UK blood services. Their Whole Blood and Component Donor Selection Guidelines, which includes the guidance relating to injectable tanning agents, were last updated on 18 July 2025. |
|
Blood: Donors
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that NHS Blood and Transplant donor exclusion policies (a) reflect up-to-date medical evidence and (b) do not unnecessarily restrict donor participation. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS Blood and Transplant’s (NHSBT) donor selection criteria are based on advice provided by the Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services’ Professional Advisory Committee (JPAC). JPAC regularly reviews its guidelines to reflect the latest evidence. Their Whole Blood and Component Donor Selection Guidelines were last updated on 18 July 2025. Based on the recommendations of the For the Assessment of Individualised Risk Steering Group, the Government updated the blood donor selection criteria in 2021, thereby providing more opportunities for people to give blood. |
|
Blood: Donors
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of replacing the lifetime blood donation deferral for people who have used tanning injections with a fixed-term exclusion period similar to those in place for (a) tattoos and (b) piercings. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) There are no plans to update the deferral policy for tanning injections. Unlike tattooing and piercing, tanning injections are not well regulated. Given injectable tanning products work internally, they do not meet the definition of a cosmetic product and are therefore not regulated via the UK Cosmetic Regulation. Regulation ensures safety standards are maintained to reduce the risk of transmitting a blood-borne infection. To protect the safety of the patient who receives the blood donation, the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 mandate permanent deferral from blood donation for anyone with a history of non-prescribed intravenous or intramuscular drug use, as per the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005, with further information available at the following link: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/50/schedule/part/3/paragraph/2n3 |
|
Overseas Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed international students levy on economic growth in (a) Leicester, (b) the East Midlands and (c) the United Kingdom; and if she will ensure the policy is reviewed prior to implementation. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The international student levy will fund the reintroduction of targeted maintenance grants for disadvantaged students to break down barriers to opportunity through our Plan for Change. This will help support more students from the lowest income households progress into and excel in higher education. This will also support our national Opportunity Mission, through which the government is breaking the damaging link between background and success. The government will set out further details on the levy at Autumn Budget. We expect the UK to remain a highly attractive study destination. Our world-class higher education sector can offer a fulfilling and enjoyable experience to international students from around the world. |
|
Overseas Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed international students levy on the competitiveness of UK universities. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The international student levy will fund the reintroduction of targeted maintenance grants for disadvantaged students to break down barriers to opportunity through our Plan for Change. This will help support more students from the lowest income households progress into and excel in higher education. This will also support our national Opportunity Mission, through which the government is breaking the damaging link between background and success. The government will set out further details on the levy at Autumn Budget. We expect the UK to remain a highly attractive study destination. Our world-class higher education sector can offer a fulfilling and enjoyable experience to international students from around the world. |
|
Taxis: Licensing
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to help ensure that local authority taxi and private hire licensing enforcement policies are brought into line with the Statutory Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Standards. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury We are currently reviewing licensing authorities’ compliance with existing guidance issued by the Department on actions they should take on licensing matters including safety. Where key safety recommendations from the guidance are not being followed, licensing authorities will be held to account. |
|
Blood: Donors
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether NHS Blood and Transplant has made an assessment of the potential impact of the use of tanning injections more than (a) 12 months (b) three months prior to donating on blood safety. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The safety of blood is of the upmost importance. Patients that receive blood donations can be particularly vulnerable to infections. In the United Kingdom, the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 mandate permanent deferral from blood donation for anyone with a history of non-prescribed intravenous or intramuscular drug use. The Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 are available at the following link: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/50/schedule/part/3/paragraph/2n3 This includes those in receipt of tanning injections, for any period prior to donation. NHS Blood and Transplant has provided guidance on blood safety by the Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee (JPAC). JPAC guidance reflects the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 in the Addiction and Drug Abuse guideline and the Blood Safety Entry guideline, which are available, respectively, at the following two links: https://transfusionguidelines.org/dsg/wb/guidelines/ad001-addiction-and-drug-abuse https://www.transfusionguidelines.org/dsg/wb/guidelines/bl008-blood-safety-entry Injections can carry a risk of blood-borne illness. To preserve the safety of patients who receive blood donations, measures are taken to reduce the risk of transmitting blood-borne infections, including cleanliness and safety standards. However, as tanning injections are not well regulated, measures that would normally be used to prevent blood-borne infection cannot be assessed. |
|
Blood: Donors
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for what reason people who have used tanning injections are permanently unable to donate blood. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The safety of blood is of the upmost importance. Patients that receive blood donations can be particularly vulnerable to infections. In the United Kingdom, the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 mandate permanent deferral from blood donation for anyone with a history of non-prescribed intravenous or intramuscular drug use. The Blood Safety and Quality Regulations 2005 are available at the following link: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/50/schedule/part/3/paragraph/2n3 This is also reflected in the Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee (JPAC) guidelines, the Addiction and Drug Abuse guideline and the Blood Safety Entry guideline, which are available, respectively, at the following two links: https://transfusionguidelines.org/dsg/wb/guidelines/ad001-addiction-and-drug-abuse https://www.transfusionguidelines.org/dsg/wb/guidelines/bl008-blood-safety-entry Injections can carry a risk of blood-borne illness. To preserve the safety of patients who receive blood donations, measures are taken to reduce the risk of transmitting blood-borne infections, including cleanliness and safety standards. However, as tanning injections are not well regulated, measures that would normally be used to prevent blood-borne infection cannot be assessed. |
|
Maternity Services: Sex
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will take steps to review NHS communications to ensure that language on (a) pregnancy and (b) breast feeding reflects biological sexes. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) We are committed to working with NHS England to ensure health communications are as clear as possible and appropriately reflect sex as a protected characteristic in the Equality Act 2010. This includes communications about pregnancy and breast feeding.
In April, in its judgment in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v. The Scottish Ministers, the Supreme Court announced that it had reached a unanimous decision that the terms ‘man’, ‘woman’, and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex. We welcome the clarity this brings.
We recognise that there will be occasions when National Health Service providers want to specifically acknowledge patients with differing characteristics, including the transgender community. This may mean that trusts and providers decide to use additive language, for example “women and trans men”, to ensure health communications reach the largest audience.
|
|
Maternity Services: Sex
Asked by: Shivani Raja (Conservative - Leicester East) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of not referencing biological sexes in some maternity care guidance on the safeguarding of patients. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department’s longstanding position is that health information should be as clear as possible and language should be used that appropriately reflects sex as defined in the Equality Act 2010. National maternity guidance and key documents, such as the Three-Year Delivery Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Services, reference women throughout. |