Information between 6th January 2026 - 16th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (58 words) Thursday 15th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Ajax Programme
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (599 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Defence |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Horse and Rider Road Safety
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (351 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (103 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Offences against Children
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Tuesday 6th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that victims aged between 13 and 16 are adequately protected under section 75 of the Crime and Policing Bill, in light of findings from the Casey Review. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) In its final report to government, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recognised that in limited circumstances, a different approach to mandatory reporting may sometimes be necessary when considering sexual activity between teenagers – for example, kissing (where a reporter otherwise has no concerns about the situation). Section 75 of the Bill therefore provides reporters with some leeway on how to proceed where a child is over thirteen and in a consensual relationship with another young person. It does not mean a situation involving underage sexual activity should be met by indifference or inaction by those in positions of responsibility for children. Guidance accompanying the commencement of the duty will make clear that sexual relationships involving teenagers under the age of consent should be referred to a relevant agency for advice and support where appropriate. |
|
Internet: Pornography
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, which department has lead responsibility for policy on online pornography regulation; and with reference to Baroness Bertin's independent report entitled Creating a Safer World – the Challenge of Regulating Online Pornography, published in February 2025, what assessment she has made of that report's finding that fragmented Government responsibilities impede effective regulation of online pornography. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office Baroness Bertin’s independent report made 32 recommendations, including on governance and oversight of pornography policy. The ‘Freedom from Violence and Abuse: a cross-government strategy to build a safer society for women and girls’, published on 18 December 2025 commits to creating a joint team to address the issues detailed in the report. As this team is not yet set up, I am answering this question from the Cabinet Office, as there is currently no lead department for this work.
The team will be formed by the Home Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Ministry of Justice and Department for Culture, Media and Sport. It will examine the evidence to inform the government’s approach to pornography policy, including the question of departmental responsibility.
|
|
Intimate Image Abuse: Victim Support Schemes
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of current criminal and civil remedies available to victims of intimate image abuse; and with reference to Baroness Bertin's independent report entitled Creating a Safer World – the Challenge of Regulating Online Pornography, published in February 2025, whether she has assessed the potential merits of that report's recommendations on an independent redress mechanism to support victims whose images have been shared without consent. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Work to address the circulation of non-consensual intimate image (NCII) content online is an important part of the government’s ambition to halve VAWG in a decade, and the recently published VAWG Strategy includes a commitment to explore routes to ensure that intimate images that are taken, created or shared without consent are removed online.
It is vital that victims and survivors have access to the support they need when they need it most. The Home Office provides funding to the Revenge Porn Helpline, which offers high-quality support and advice to victims of NCII abuse, engages with law enforcement and other stakeholders to improve the response to intimate image abuse, and raises awareness of the nature of NCII abuse and the harm that it can cause.
The Government committed in the VAWG Strategy to create a joint team, across the Home Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Ministry of Justice and Department for Culture, Media and Sport, to address the issues detailed in Baroness Bertin’s Independent Pornography Review and rigorously examine the evidence to inform the government’s approach to pornography policy. Further details on this will be shared in due course.
|
|
Gender Based Violence: Finance
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what funding her Department has allocated to tackling violence against women and girls since 5 July 2024. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The Home Office allocated £74 million in FY2024/2025 and £122.3 million in FY2025/2026 to tackle Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG). Our investment funds a range of vital frontline support services to victims of VAWG, improving police response to VAWG and tackling the root causes of VAWG. The scale of violence against women and girls in our country is intolerable and this Government is treating it as the national emergency that it is. The cross-government VAWG Strategy,published on 18 December 2025, sets out the strategic direction and concrete actions to prevent violence and abuse, pursue perpetrators, and support victims, and to deliver our unprecedented commitment to halve VAWG in a decade. The Strategy is backed by at least £1 billion funding across government over the spending review period. |
|
Anti-social Behaviour: Children
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to publish guidance to clarify the legal position of children aged 13 to 16 under section 75 of the Crime and Policing Bill. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Before commencing the new duty to report child sexual abuse, the Government will provide an appropriate period of time to prepare relevant sectors for implementation. This will include the development and publication of guidance for reporters. |
|
Equality and Human Rights Commission: Codes of Practice
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, when she plans to respond to the recommendations made by the Equality and Human Rights Commission on their updated code of practice following the For Women Scotland ruling. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) I refer the Hon Member to my written answer to PQ92379, dated 26 November 2025, which provides the information you requested.
The EHRC has revised its Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations following the consultation and submitted it to the Minister for Women and Equalities on 4 September 2025. This is a long and legally complex document which will have an impact on service providers up and down the country. Rightfully we are carefully considering it.
The process for laying the Code in Parliament is set out in the Equality Act 2006. The Government will follow this process. If the decision is taken to approve the Code, it will be laid before Parliament for a 40 day period. |
|
Pornography
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to Baroness Bertin's independent report entitled Creating a Safer World – the Challenge of Regulating Online Pornography, published in February 2025, whether he has assessed the potential merits of that report's recommendation to hold a problematic pornography use consultation to determine whether it should be formally classed as an addiction, including the potential impact on public health policy and clinical guidance. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government welcomes Baroness Bertin’s independent report, named Creating a Safer World – the Challenge of Regulating Online Pornography, as shedding light on an important issue. The finding that high levels of pornography use can lead to mental health issues in young people is deeply concerning. The nation’s mental health has deteriorated over the past decade, so it is vital we examine the range of potential risk factors for mental ill health. That is why the Government has launched an independent review into the prevalence and support for mental health conditions, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism. On the recommendation to consider a consultation on whether problematic pornography use should be formally classified as an addiction, there are no current plans to launch a consultation on this issue. Classification of conditions, including behavioural addictions, is a matter for international diagnostic frameworks. In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) provides robust, evidence-based clinical guidance to support commissioners and providers in improving outcomes for people using the National Health Service, public health, and social care services. NICE guidance is informed by the best available research and international standards, including positions taken by the World Health Organisation. There is a wide range of support available for individuals struggling with their mental health, whatever the reason. Since July 2024, the Government has recruited over 7,000 additional mental health professionals, expanded NHS talking therapy sessions for adults experiencing depression and anxiety, and accelerated the rollout of mental health support teams in schools and colleges, aiming for full national coverage by 2029. |
|
Intimate Image Abuse
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many reports of non-consensual sexual deepfake images have been recorded by police forces in England and Wales in each of the last three years for which figures are available; and what steps her Department is taking to prevent the creation and distribution of synthetic sexual images. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Office for National Statistics publishes information on the number of ‘threaten to share intimate photograph or film’ offences recorded by the police in England and Wales, but information on whether these offences involved non-consensual sexual deepfake images is not centrally held. Data for these offences can be found in Table 11 on the Office for National Statistic’s website (Sexual offences prevalence and victim characteristics, England and Wales - Office for National Statistics) On 18 December 2025, the Government published ‘Freedom from Violence and Abuse: A Cross-Government Strategy to Build a Safer Society for Women and Girls’, which included an announcement to ban nudification apps and other tools designed to create synthetic non-consensual intimate images. This Strategy includes a commitment to explore routes to ensure that intimate images that are taken, created or shared without consent are removed online. In January 2024, the Online Safety Act brought into force offences for the sharing, and threatening to share intimate images including ‘deepfakes’. These are ‘priority illegal offences’, the most serious category of online offence under the Act. The Data (Use and Access) Act inserts new offences into the Sexual Offences Act 2003, criminalising the creation and requesting the creation of an intimate deepfake without consent or reasonable belief in consent. In addition, the Home Office introduced world-leading measures making the UK the first country to outlaw possession, creation and distribution of AI tools for generating child sexual abuse material, as well as criminalising paedophile manuals that instruct others on developing such tools. |
|
Pornography Review
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she plans to set out a timetable for the implementation of the recommendations of Baroness Bertin's Independent Pornography Review by May 2026. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) ‘Freedom from Violence and Abuse: a cross-government strategy to build a safer society for women and girls’ commits to creating a joint team to address the issues in Baroness Bertin’s Review. The team will be formed by the Home Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Ministry of Justice and Department for Culture, Media and Sport. It will examine the evidence to inform the government’s approach to pornography policy. Government has already taken action. Pornography showing strangulation or suffocation will be criminalised under the Crime and Policing Bill and will be a priority offence under the Online Safety Act. |
|
Gardens Trust: Planning Permission
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what regard he has given to representations from the Gardens Trust about his Department's plans to remove it as a statutory consultee in the planning system. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) On 17 November 2025, my Department published a consultation on reforms to the statutory consultee system. That consultation closed on 13 January 2026 and can be found on gov.uk here.
No decision will be made on the Garden Trust’s role until responses to the consultation have been fully analysed and considered. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Jan 2026, 9:48 a.m. - House of Commons " Rebecca Smith straight. have a meeting with the Managing Director of Stagecoach in my region. Having worked closely with the right hon. Member for Torridge and Tavistock to mitigate the impact of " Rebecca Smith MP (South West Devon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
15 Jan 2026, 9:46 a.m. - House of Commons " Rebecca Smith. bid to be the City of Culture 2029, and I wonder if the Secretary of State realises that there has never been a southern city of culture, " Rebecca Smith MP (South West Devon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Horse and Rider Road Safety
75 speeches (9,787 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) asked about speed limits. - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 7th January 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Transport, Network Rail, Department for Transport, and Department for Transport Railways Bill - Transport Committee Found: Q271 Rebecca Smith: I want to go back to something you said, Minister. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 22nd January 2026 11:30 a.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 22nd January 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 20th January 2026 9:25 a.m. Railways Bill - Oral evidence Subject: To consider the Bill At 9:25am: Oral evidence Jeremy Westlake - Chief Executive at Network Rail John Larkinson - Chief Executive at Office of Rail and Road Alex Hynes - Chief Executive at DfT Operator At 10:10am: Oral evidence Keith Williams CBE Richard Brown CBE At 10:35am: Oral evidence Ben Plowden - CEO at Campaign for Better Transport Michael Roberts - CEO at London TravelWatch Emma Vogelmann - CEO at Transport for All Alex Robertson - Chief Executive at Transport Focus View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 20th January 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Oral evidence Subject: Further to consider the Bill At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Mr John Thomas - Policy Director at AllRail Steve Montgomery - Managing Director at First Rail Maggie Simpson OBE - Director General at Rail Freight Group At 2:40pm: Oral evidence John Davies - VP of Industry Relations at Trainline Catriona Meehan - Member Representative (Omio) at Independent Rail Retailers At 3:05pm: Oral evidence Bill Reeve - Director of Rail Reform at Transport Scotland Peter McDonald - Director of Transport and Digital Connectivity at Welsh Government At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Malcolm Brown - CEO at Angel Trains Darren Caplan - Chief Executive at Railway Industry Association Rob Morris - Joint CEO SMO UKI and Managing Director at Siemens At 4:10pm: Oral evidence Andy Burnham - Mayor at Greater Manchester Combined Authority Jason Prince - Director at Urban Transport Group Tracy Brabin - Mayor at West Yorkshire Combined Authority At 5:00pm: Oral evidence Richard Bowker CBE At 5:20pm: Oral evidence Keir Mather MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Aviation, Maritime and Decarbonisation) at Department for Transport Lilian Greenwood MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Local Transport) at Department for Transport View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 9:25 a.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 29th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 29th January 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 26th January 2026 3:30 p.m. Ecclesiastical Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Joined-up journeys: achieving and measuring transport integration At 9:15am: Oral evidence Kate Carpenter - Vice President at Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation Robert Johnson - Analyst at Centre for Cities Professor Greg Marsden - Professor of Transport Governance at Institute for Transport Studies Damien Jones - Chair at Association of Transport Co-ordinating Officers View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 9:25 a.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 5th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 5th February 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 2 p.m. Railways Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
29 Jan 2026
Road Safety Strategy Transport Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 13 Mar 2026) The Government has published a new Road Safety Strategy setting out the Government’s approach to reducing death and serious injury. The Transport Committee is launching an inquiry to examine its potential effectiveness. |