Information between 6th February 2026 - 16th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 11 a.m. Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall Subject: Foster care recruitment and retention View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 7 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 7 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 7 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 7 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 5 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 3 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 3 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 3 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
5 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 7 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 8 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Railways Bill (Fourteenth sitting) - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Rebecca Smith voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Rebecca Smith contributed 2 speeches (97 words) Thursday 12th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (145 words) Wednesday 11th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Local Government Finance
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (93 words) Wednesday 11th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Pensions and Social Security
Rebecca Smith contributed 1 speech (1,924 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Rebecca Smith speeches from: Railways Bill (Thirteenth sitting)
Rebecca Smith contributed 3 speeches (898 words) Committee stage: 13th sitting Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Question Link
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether his Department has made a recent evaluation of the effectiveness of the under-occupation deduction policy for social rented housing. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Department has not recently evaluated the effectiveness of the Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy.
Information on the number of households subjected to the Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy, by nations and regions, is available on Stat-Xplore via the Housing Benefit and Universal Credit official statistics (https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/). The information can be found in the Households on Universal Credit dataset, and the Housing Benefit – Data from April 2018 dataset, and are currently available to August 2025.
Users can log in or access Stat-Xplore as a guest, and if needed, can access guidance on how to extract the information required. There is also a Universal Credit Official Statistics: Stat-Xplore user guide. |
|
Question Link
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether his Department will publish (a) national and (b) regional breakdowns of under-occupied social rented housing. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Department has not recently evaluated the effectiveness of the Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy.
Information on the number of households subjected to the Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy, by nations and regions, is available on Stat-Xplore via the Housing Benefit and Universal Credit official statistics (https://stat-xplore.dwp.gov.uk/). The information can be found in the Households on Universal Credit dataset, and the Housing Benefit – Data from April 2018 dataset, and are currently available to August 2025.
Users can log in or access Stat-Xplore as a guest, and if needed, can access guidance on how to extract the information required. There is also a Universal Credit Official Statistics: Stat-Xplore user guide. |
|
Question Link
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 101646 on Offences against Children, whether guidance will explicitly address the concerns outlined in the Casey Review that Child Sexual Exploitation cases were being dropped or downgraded from rape to lesser charges where a 13 to 15 year-old has been 'in love' or 'had consented to' sex with the perpetrator. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Guidance accompanying the new mandatory reporting duty will make clear that child sexual abuse must never be tolerated. The government will work closely with those impacted by the introduction of the duty to ensure it is clearly understood ahead of commencement. |
|
Question Link
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 101646 on Offences against Children, whether guidance to volunteer groups will explicitly state that child sexual abuse must not be tolerated under any circumstances, even where apparent consent is claimed. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Guidance accompanying the new mandatory reporting duty will make clear that child sexual abuse must never be tolerated. The government will work closely with those impacted by the introduction of the duty to ensure it is clearly understood ahead of commencement. |
|
Question Link
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Thursday 12th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 18 December 2025 to Question 101647 on Anti-social Behaviour: Children, whether she will provide a forum for volunteer groups to ask questions that may arise as a result of the new guidance. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Guidance accompanying the new mandatory reporting duty will make clear that child sexual abuse must never be tolerated. The government will work closely with those impacted by the introduction of the duty to ensure it is clearly understood ahead of commencement. |
|
Foster Care
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Tuesday 10th February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the regionalisation of foster care commissioning on the role of independent fostering agencies, including on (a) placement availability, (b) costs to local authorities and (c) outcomes for children in care. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Every child in care should have a safe, loving home at value for money for the taxpayer. Through our package of measures, including those in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, we will rebalance the placements market, improve competition, regulation and commissioning of placements, shine a light on the level of profit being made, and bring greater visibility to the prices local authorities are paying. Our fostering plan, published 4 February, focuses predominantly on strengthening local authority fostering provision, which has seen the biggest decrease in foster carers in recent years. We know that, where appropriate for the child, fostering typically delivers the best outcomes. Concurrently, we want to see an expansion of third sector provision, as well as learning from private providers who achieve good outcomes for children and how their best practice can be shared. Our wider reforms will also mean local authorities, working together as Regional Care Co-operatives (RCCs), can co-ordinate their approach to private provision more effectively. This will mean they can plan and purchase support from Independent Fostering Agencies, using collective negotiation to improve value for local government, and ensure that care meets children’s needs. Further details on our vision for RCCs was also published 4 February. |
|
Foster Care
Asked by: Rebecca Smith (Conservative - South West Devon) Tuesday 10th February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of independent fostering agencies on a) costs to local authorities and b) outcomes for children in care; and whether plans to regionalise the commissioning of foster care placements will reflect those impacts. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Every child in care should have a safe, loving home at value for money for the taxpayer. Through our package of measures, including those in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, we will rebalance the placements market, improve competition, regulation and commissioning of placements, shine a light on the level of profit being made, and bring greater visibility to the prices local authorities are paying. Our fostering plan, published 4 February, focuses predominantly on strengthening local authority fostering provision, which has seen the biggest decrease in foster carers in recent years. We know that, where appropriate for the child, fostering typically delivers the best outcomes. Concurrently, we want to see an expansion of third sector provision, as well as learning from private providers who achieve good outcomes for children and how their best practice can be shared. Our wider reforms will also mean local authorities, working together as Regional Care Co-operatives (RCCs), can co-ordinate their approach to private provision more effectively. This will mean they can plan and purchase support from Independent Fostering Agencies, using collective negotiation to improve value for local government, and ensure that care meets children’s needs. Further details on our vision for RCCs was also published 4 February. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
10 Feb 2026, 2:58 p.m. - House of Commons "Rebecca Smith. >> Thank you. Madam Deputy Speaker, I want to. >> Just start. >> By reassuring the right hon. Member for East Ham about something " Rebecca Smith MP (South West Devon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Feb 2026, 2:58 p.m. - House of Commons " Yeah. the draft guaranteed minimum pensions increase order as on the Order Paper. Shadow Minister Rebecca Smith. " Rebecca Smith MP (South West Devon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Feb 2026, 12:19 p.m. - House of Commons " Rebecca Smith. Autonomy and given a defence Growth deal. However, the SMEs in the unmanned surface vessel sector, many based at Turnchapel Wharf in " Rebecca Smith MP (South West Devon, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Feb 2026, 10:06 a.m. - House of Commons " Rebecca Smith Mr. speaker, yes. Mr. >> Only this party has a serious sustainable plan to provide better bus services across the country " Q8. Whether her Department plans to reinstate the £2 bus fare cap. (907842) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Feb 2026, 10:07 a.m. - House of Commons " I'd like to Rebecca Smith. " Lilian Greenwood MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) (Nottingham South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Oral Answers to Questions
163 speeches (10,587 words) Thursday 12th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Lindsay Hoyle (Spk - Chorley) I was going to call Rebecca Smith, but she is not standing. - Link to Speech |
|
Pensions and Social Security
33 speeches (9,425 words) Tuesday 10th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Stephen Timms (Lab - East Ham) Member for South West Devon (Rebecca Smith) for clarifying what happened in 1997—she read my facial expression - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026
Report - 8th Report - Railways Bill Transport Committee Found: Kent) Alex Mayer (Labour; Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard) Baggy Shanker (Labour; Derby South) Rebecca Smith |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026
Report - 7th Report - Rail investment pipelines: ending boom and bust Transport Committee Found: Kent) Alex Mayer (Labour; Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard) Baggy Shanker (Labour; Derby South) Rebecca Smith |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 25th February 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Joined-up journeys: achieving and measuring transport integration At 9:15am: Oral evidence Will Jansen - Chief Operations Officer at Forest Samuel Griffiths - Head of Northern Europe at Via Martijn Gilbert - Managing Director at Arriva UK Bus Robert Price - Programme Manager - Transport and Mobility at techUK View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Supercharging the EV transition At 9:15am: Oral evidence Dr Nicole Bulawa Jarrod Birch - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at ChargeUK Wesley Scott - Head of Industrial Sales and Solution at Brook Green Supply Esme Yuill - Head of External Affairs at Transport East David Boyer - Head of Electricity Systems at Energy Networks Association View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |