22 Rachel Taylor debates involving the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

English Devolution and Local Government

Rachel Taylor Excerpts
Wednesday 5th February 2025

(1 year, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Angela Rayner Portrait Angela Rayner
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Again, we are working with local areas to deliver devolution. This is about pushing power down to local areas and about reorganisation, and we are working with local authorities to deliver for their local area. I have been clear on the terms to which there was a 12-month delay to those elections to facilitate reorganisation and devolution in those areas. This is not a new phenomenon; it happened under the previous Government. We are turbocharging devolution so that we can deliver for local areas.

Rachel Taylor Portrait Rachel Taylor (North Warwickshire and Bedworth) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I welcome the statement made by my right hon. Friend. I also draw Members’ attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. In North Warwickshire and Bedworth, my constituents can see the benefits of devolution just over the boundary in the West Midlands combined authority, and I am sure that they want to see those benefits for themselves. I ask her why Conservative-run Warwickshire county council asked to have their elections postponed. Was it because they wanted to avoid public scrutiny of their appalling record on SEND education, on fixing our rural roads and on rural transport? Does she agree that it is better that districts and counties work together to come up with the best solution for residents on devolution, and will she set out the timetable for the second stage of that devolution, so that I can tell my constituents when they can feel the benefits of investment, growth and better transport?

Oral Answers to Questions

Rachel Taylor Excerpts
Monday 2nd December 2024

(1 year, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Matthew Pennycook Portrait Matthew Pennycook
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have set out the routes to redress that are already available and our intention to switch on the measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act, but I am more than happy to sit down and have a conversation with my hon. Friend about what more protection leaseholders in this space require.

Rachel Taylor Portrait Rachel Taylor (North Warwickshire and Bedworth) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

17. What steps her Department is taking to allocate local growth funding according to need.

Gill German Portrait Gill German (Clwyd North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

18. What steps her Department is taking to allocate local growth funding according to need.

Alex Norris Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Alex Norris)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are intent on moving towards allocated, multi-year funding settlements targeted at need. We will set out this refreshed vision for local growth funding in the multi-year spending review, working with local leaders to drive growth in the areas that need it most, and ending the plethora of competitive pots.

Rachel Taylor Portrait Rachel Taylor
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I am very pleased to hear the Minister’s reply. The last Government wasted local authorities’ time and money by making them bid for handouts from central Government. In North Warwickshire, so much time was spent preparing numerous bids for the new swimming pool and leisure centre that our community desperately needed, only for vital funds to go to places without such high levels of need. Under this Labour Government, will the Minister ensure that local authorities receive the fair funding they require to deliver the local services they know their communities need?

Alex Norris Portrait Alex Norris
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes an important point about the harm done by that “beauty parade” funding model, which was inefficient and created so much disappointment. What follows will be much better.