Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Debate between Paul Holmes and Gideon Amos
Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is almost as though my hon. Friend had read a further section of my speech. That is exactly what we need to do in this country to unlock some of those sites.

Paul Holmes Portrait Paul Holmes (Hamble Valley) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way on that point?

Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will make a little progress, but maybe later.

Paul Holmes Portrait Paul Holmes
- Hansard - -

Oh, come on—I was going to be nice to you!

Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We shall put that to the test later.

We welcome the provisions that allow compulsory acquisition—where there is a compelling case in the public interest, such as to build social housing—to go ahead on the basis of existing use value, not what the owner hopes will be the value in the future, to the detriment of the public purse. That could make a big difference. It would allow councils to assemble land more affordably, and to deliver more social homes. However, councils need to be resourced to carry out such projects. To that end, I am delighted that the proposal to abolish the cap on planning application fees that my hon. Friend the Member for St Albans (Daisy Cooper) brought forward in her Bill in 2023 is included in this Bill.