Police Conduct and David Carrick Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Police Conduct and David Carrick

Nigel Evans Excerpts
Tuesday 17th January 2023

(2 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lee Anderson Portrait Lee Anderson (Ashfield) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

David Carrick is now one of the UK’s most prolific rapists, and he did that while serving as a police officer. It is utterly disgusting. Does the Home Secretary agree we should review sentencing laws? We have already done that for people who kill emergency workers, so how about reviewing the sentencing law so that if a police officer commits these horrible crimes, we increase their sentence? Does she also agree that the managers who knew about this should be sacked immediately—

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Nigel Evans)
- Hansard - -

Order. Please remember sub judice. We should not be talking about sentencing. Home Secretary, just answer the points you can.

Suella Braverman Portrait Suella Braverman
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend voices the frustration and disappointment we are all feeling today at a serving police officer having been found responsible for such heinous and appalling crimes. An abuse of trust has shattered public confidence in policing, and undermined the safety of women and girls. We will not shy away from doing what is necessary to ensure that cases such as this are not repeated, and so that women and girls in particular can have confidence in policing around the country.

None Portrait Several hon. Members rose—
- Hansard -

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. I remind Members that aspects of this issue are sub judice. Please stay well away from anything relating to things that are still before the courts.

Wendy Chamberlain Portrait Wendy Chamberlain (North East Fife) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I too commend the bravery of the women involved in this case, but some of them would not have needed to be brave if action had been taken. As a former police officer I am disgusted and ashamed by what I have heard. The Metropolitan Police Commissioner has said that 800 of his officers are under investigation. Has the Home Secretary requested similar figures from other police forces? What is the impact on the operational capability of police officers? Finally, as the Mother of the House rightly pointed out, police officers are not employed. They are not subject to employment law; they are appointed. Staff associations within the police service, such as the Police Federation, play a very important role in disciplinary and conduct issues. What engagement is the Home Secretary having with them?