Debates between Mark Garnier and Stephen Kinnock during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Tue 1st Dec 2020
National Security and Investment Bill (Fifth sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee stage: 5th sitting & Committee Debate: 5th sitting: House of Commons
Thu 26th Nov 2020
National Security and Investment Bill (Fourth sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee stage: 4th sitting & Committee Debate: 4th sitting: House of Commons

National Security and Investment Bill (Fifth sitting)

Debate between Mark Garnier and Stephen Kinnock
Chi Onwurah Portrait Chi Onwurah
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am struggling to see how that would happen. How would Parliament, after the Bill becomes law, decide that the Intelligence and Security Committee, as opposed to or in addition to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, should have a role. How would that happen in practice?

Stephen Kinnock Portrait Stephen Kinnock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There are plenty of examples of Select Committees getting involved in the upstream work of Government—for example, giving feedback on White Papers. Parliament and its Select Committees consistently get involved in the work of Government in that context.

Mark Garnier Portrait Mark Garnier
- Hansard - -

rose—

National Security and Investment Bill (Fourth sitting)

Debate between Mark Garnier and Stephen Kinnock
Stephen Kinnock Portrait Stephen Kinnock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q I am sorry; I saw that you have done a lot of work with private equity and thought that you may have been involved in that aspect of it. On sovereign wealth funds, do you see the China Investment Corporation—I do not know if you have ever done any work with it—as an arm of the Chinese Communist party?

Will Jackson-Moore: I am not in a position to talk about specific individual organisations. A number of sovereign funds in China are very well regarded in the international capital markets. However, in terms of their interaction with Chinese Government, that is not something that I have a perspective on.

Mark Garnier Portrait Mark Garnier
- Hansard - -

Q My apologies for not being here at the beginning. I am interested in your work on sovereign wealth funds and private equity funds, in terms of working out the value of an investment asset. We heard evidence in the first session this afternoon—I do not know if you were here—than the fact that this Bill will restrict the number of potential buyers out there might then restrict the amount of interest coming in to start with; an investor with a target company to invest in may have limited numbers of people that they could sell it to when they want to exit, which will adjust the price. Have you had any thoughts about that at all?

Will Jackson-Moore: As I mentioned earlier, the UK is the gold standard for a location to invest in, particularly within Europe. Investors like investing in the UK because of the fairness and transparency, UK law and UK courts, and as a place to be based and to live, so there is an inherent benefit to doing UK-based transactions. However, and as we sit here right now, on a scorecard-type approach, the UK is not as attractive a location as it has been historically. We have the uncertainties of Brexit and we have a number of other territories looking to recover and rethink their economies given the situation we are all in, so there will be more—