Mark Garnier Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Mark Garnier

Information between 4th January 2026 - 24th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 194
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 317
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326


Speeches
Mark Garnier speeches from: National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Mark Garnier contributed 6 speeches (2,458 words)
Committee of the whole House
Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Mark Garnier speeches from: Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Regulations 2025
Mark Garnier contributed 1 speech (2,193 words)
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - General Committees
HM Treasury
Mark Garnier speeches from: Bromsgrove: Local Government
Mark Garnier contributed 2 speeches (141 words)
Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Westminster Hall
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government


Written Answers
Cryptocurrencies: Regulation
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 5th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with his USA counterpart under the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future on mutual recognition of UK and US cryptoasset firms, aligned disclosure standards, and ensuring that decentralised protocols are not regulated as financial infrastructure.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future was established by HM Treasury and the US Treasury on 22 September.

Its purpose is to bring the world’s leading financial centres together to develop concrete policy options and recommendations on further financial market innovation, with a particular focus on digital assets and capital markets. Innovation in these industries will be central to the government’s mission for economic growth.

Further details can be found here: Boosting collaboration between UK and US financial systems to drive innovation and growth in global markets - GOV.UK

Cryptocurrencies: Regulation
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 5th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department plans to use the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future to deepen engagement with United States’ regulators following the finalisation of the GENIUS Act, to support regulatory alignment on cross border stablecoins.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future was established by HM Treasury and the US Treasury on 22 September.

Its purpose is to bring the world’s leading financial centres together to develop concrete policy options and recommendations on further financial market innovation, with a particular focus on digital assets and capital markets. Innovation in these industries will be central to the government’s mission for economic growth.

Further details can be found here: Boosting collaboration between UK and US financial systems to drive innovation and growth in global markets - GOV.UK

Cryptocurrencies: Regulation
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 5th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future is being used to develop a joint UK-US approach to tokenisation, including cross-border access to tokenised securities and aligned rules for capital, disclosure and decentralised wallets.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future was established by HM Treasury and the US Treasury on 22 September.

Its purpose is to bring the world’s leading financial centres together to develop concrete policy options and recommendations on further financial market innovation, with a particular focus on digital assets and capital markets. Innovation in these industries will be central to the government’s mission for economic growth.

Further details can be found here: Boosting collaboration between UK and US financial systems to drive innovation and growth in global markets - GOV.UK

State Retirement Pensions: Income Tax
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 12th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer on 8 December 2025 to Question 96643, whether she has any plans to require pensioners who received the state pension as their only income and consequently inherit part of (a) the basic state pension, (b) the additional state pension and (c) the new state pension following the death of their spouse or civil partner to pay income tax.

Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

As set out in my reply to Question 96643, the Chancellor has said that those whose only income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments will not have to pay income tax over this Parliament. At the Budget, the Government announced that it will achieve this by easing the administrative burden for pensioners so that they do not have to pay small amounts of tax via Simple Assessment from 2027/28. The Government will set out more detail in due course.
State Retirement Pensions: Income Tax
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 12th January 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer on 8 December 2025 to Question 96643, whether she has any plans to require pensioners who receive both the basic state pension and the additional state pension as their only income to pay income tax.

Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

As set out in my reply to Question 96643, the Chancellor has said that those whose only income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments will not have to pay income tax over this Parliament. At the Budget, the Government announced that it will achieve this by easing the administrative burden for pensioners so that they do not have to pay small amounts of tax via Simple Assessment from 2027/28. The Government will set out more detail in due course.
Ground Rent
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, when he plans to publish the Government’s response to the consultation entitled ‘Modern leasehold: restricting ground rent for existing leases’ published on 9 November 2023.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 99005 on 5 January 2026.

Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, when he will bring forward secondary legislation to implement the core elements of the Act.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The government has already made significant progress when it comes to commencing provisions in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024:

  • On 24 July 2024, we brought into force provisions relating to rentcharge arrears, building safety legal costs and the work of professional insolvency practitioners.
  • On 31 October 2024, we brought into force further building safety measures.
  • On 31 January 2025, we commenced provisions to remove the two-year qualifying rule in relation to enfranchisement and lease extensions.
  • On 3 March 2025, the right to manage provisions (expanding access, reforming its costs, and voting rights) came into force.

The government recognises the considerable financial strain that rising service charges place on leaseholders and tenants. The level of service charge that leaseholders pay depends on many factors, including the terms of a lease and the age and condition of a building. By law, variable service charges must be reasonable. Overcharging through service charges is completely unacceptable. Should leaseholders wish to contest the reasonableness of their service charges they may make an application to the appropriate tribunal.

On 4 July 2025, the government published a consultation, jointly with the Welsh Government, on strengthening leaseholder protections over charges and services. The consultation included proposals to increase transparency over service charges and enhance access to redress through the relevant provisions in the Act. It also proposed new reforms the section 20 ‘major works’ procedure. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here. It closed on 26 September 2025, and we are analysing responses with a view to bringing the relevant measures into force as quickly as possible.

On 18 December 2025, the government launched a consultation on proposals to implement the Act’s new consumer protections for homeowners living on freehold estates. These include ensuring that homeowners who pay an estate management charge have better access to information they need to understand what they are paying for, the right to challenge the reasonableness at the First-tier Tribunal (in England), and to go to the tribunal to appoint a substitute manager. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here and will remain open for responses until 12 March 2026. We will look to bring these measures into force as quickly as possible thereafter.

The Act also sets the method for calculating the price of a statutory lease extension or freehold acquisition, known as the valuation process. It removes the requirement for marriage value to be paid, caps the treatment of ground rents in the valuation calculation at 0.1% of the freehold value, and allows government to prescribe the rates used to calculate the enfranchisement premium. Valuation rates used to calculate the enfranchisement premium will be set by the Secretary of State in secondary legislation. We will consult on valuation rates and commence the relevant provisions as soon as possible. As per my Written Ministerial Statement of 21 November 2024 (HCWS244), primary legislation will be required to rectify a small number of specific flaws in the 2024 Act before the Act’s enfranchisement provisions are commenced.

National Leasehold Campaign
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what recent discussions he has had with the National Leasehold Campaign.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

MHCLG Ministers and officials engage regularly with a range of stakeholders in respect of leasehold and commonhold reform, including the National Leasehold Campaign.

Commonhold and Leasehold: Reform
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to publish the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill before the end of the 2024-26 parliamentary session.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 102833 on 12 January 2026.

Commonhold and Leasehold: Reform
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 14th January 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether Plotland sites will be included within the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 102833 on 12 January 2026.



MP Financial Interests
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to Qatar between 19 May 2025 and 23 May 2025
Source
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment received on 24 May 2024 - £15,000.00
Source
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment received on 02 June 2025 - £2,000.00
Source
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
4. Visits outside the UK
International visit to China between 05 January 2025 and 10 January 2025
Source



Mark Garnier mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

21 Jan 2026, 3:56 p.m. - House of Commons
"Minister Mark Garnier. >> Well, thank you, Madam Deputy Chairman. The pensions Minister is absolutely right. There is an awful "
Torsten Bell MP, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Swansea West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
21 Jan 2026, 3:01 p.m. - House of Commons
"new clauses as on the selection and grouping paper. I call Mark Garnier "
Olly Glover MP (Didcot and Wantage, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
38 speeches (6,785 words)
Committee of the whole House
Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Chris Vince (LAB - Harlow) Member for Wyre Forest (Mark Garnier), challenged Labour MPs to champion their constituencies. - Link to Speech
2: Torsten Bell (Lab - Swansea West) Member for Wyre Forest (Mark Garnier) for the reminder of the excellent debate we had before the Christmas - Link to Speech

Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Regulations 2025
7 speeches (3,276 words)
Tuesday 20th January 2026 - General Committees
HM Treasury
Mentions:
1: Lucy Rigby (Lab - Northampton North) Member for Wyre Forest (Mark Garnier). - Link to Speech

Planning applications in Stourport-on-Severn
0 speeches (None words)
Thursday 8th January 2026 - Petitions

Mentions:
1: None —[Presented by Mark Garnier, Official Report, 11 November 2025; Vol. 775, c. 130.] - Link to Speech