Joined House of Lords: 25th January 2021
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Lord Godson, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
Lord Godson has not introduced any legislation before Parliament
Lord Godson has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting
As Leader, I met Permanent Secretaries from across Government Departments in November this year. During the meeting I stressed the importance of responding to Questions for Written Answer within the 10 day target. Alongside this my office keeps close oversight of departments who have outstanding responses. I also regularly discuss parliamentary performance with Ministers in a group setting and individually.
This specific question HL11657 was answered on the 19th December.
Levels of National Security Vetting required are not primarily based on length of employment, or whether an individual is employed on a permanent or temporary basis.
The level of vetting required for a role is instead based on a range of factors, including: access to classified material, buildings and other assets; proximity to public figures assessed to be at particular risk from terrorist attack; and access to information or material assessed to be of value to terrorists or hostile states.
Cross Civil Service networks are volunteer-led networks. Representatives from these networks are able to come together periodically as a group to discuss appropriate issues. The arrangements for internal dialogue with and between individual departmental networks is a matter for departments.
Responsibility for, and management of departmental diversity networks is delegated to individual departments as the employer. Lists are not held centrally by the Cabinet Office.
The Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) is a volunteer collaborative group of Civil Service staff. The majority of staff network time is voluntary. The CSMN network does not hold a budget, but a department can choose to provide support where there is a business case to do so. We are not aware of any such financial support and there has been no central funding.
Staff networks are volunteer networks, organised by staff themselves rather than the department.
The only membership criteria the Civil Service Muslim Network has is for members to be a current civil servant.
The Network openly invites civil servants of all backgrounds, beliefs, and non-beliefs to join the Civil Service Muslim Network.
Civil Service Race Forum (CSRF) is a cross government volunteer network which is responsible for arranging its own meetings. The network has held a total of 48 meetings over the past four years which have included its network leaders. Due to the informal and often personal nature of these discussions formal minutes are not recorded or published. In the past 12 months, no Ministers or Permanent Secretaries have participated in CSRF network meetings.
The Civil Service Race Forum (CSRF) was established in 2016 as a cross-government volunteer network. CSRF has developed their own Terms of Reference which govern their ways of working. These are informed by the Civil Service Code and CSRF’s own Governance Committee.
Cross-Civil Service networks do not have a sponsoring department. All network members are bound by the Civil Service Code. It is the responsibility of their employing department to make sure as civil servants they adhere to the Civil Service Code at all times including whilst conducting network activity.
CSRF does not hold a budget and there has been no cost to the public purse of the CSRF since 2020. We do not hold any records prior to this date.
All civil servants are bound by the Civil Service Code. All civil servants are expected to follow the standards of behaviour as set out in the Code, including the core values of integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality. It is the responsibility of the employing Department or Agency to make their employees aware of the Code and its values.
The guidance published on 14 May remains in place.
We are carefully reviewing the Prime Minister’s Trade Envoy programme in the context of the new Government’s trade and industrial strategies. The House will be notified of any appointments in due course.
The UK offers one of the best education systems in the world, especially teaching and research in high growth sectors of the future. We welcome high-quality students from across the world, including from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The Office for Students is the independent regulator of higher education in England. As such, it monitors the financial health of providers to ensure it has an up to date understanding of the sustainability of the sector.
The UK and UAE have a deep and long-standing bilateral relationship, and we will continue to discuss this matter with their government.
The UK provides a world-leading education system, especially in teaching and research in high-growth sectors. We welcome high-quality students from across the world, including from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
We are committed to challenging extremist narratives, disrupting radicalising groups, and tackling the causes of radicalisation. We have some of the strongest laws in the world to protect citizens from hatred and terrorism. The ‘Prevent duty’ guidance, recently updated to address evolving threats, and the government’s consistent review and proscription of extremist organisations, demonstrates our commitment to student welfare and safety.
The education sector plays a vital role in safeguarding learners from radicalisation and remains the highest contributor of referrals to the Prevent programme. We provide resources through the ‘Educate Against Hate’ website, helping pupils and staff understand terrorism risks and challenge extremist views.
The UK and UAE have a long-standing relationship. We will continue to discuss this matter with their government.
The independent Curriculum and Assessment Review and its recommendations will be driven by evidence and a commitment to high standards for all young people, irrespective of background. Professor Francis OBE was appointed due to her professional expertise including as Chief Executive of the Education Endowment Foundation.
The government recognises that UK higher education (HE) creates opportunity, is an engine for growth in our economy and supports local communities. In making the tough decision to increase tuition fee caps, after seven years of frozen fee caps under the previous government, the department’s immediate priority is helping all providers manage the financial pressures they are facing.
However, if the department is to maintain and enhance our national and international reputation, we need a culture that accepts nothing less than high standards, and that requires continuous improvement from all providers. This requires a rigorous approach to improving quality and supporting improvement. The department expects all providers to raise the bar further on teaching standards to maintain and improve our world-leading reputation and to drive out poor practice.
Following Sir David Behan’s review, the department will work closely with a re-focused Office for Students (OfS) as it develops its new approach to assessing quality. My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education has already taken the crucial first step of appointing Sir David as interim Chair of the OfS to oversee this important work.
The department expects the sector to deliver the very best outcomes, both for students and for the country. The department will publish its plan for HE reform by summer 2025 and will work with the sector and the OfS to deliver the change that the country needs.
Unjustifiable increases in the proportion of top degrees being awarded threaten to undermine the value of degrees. Data published by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA, now a part of Jisc), shows in the past two years the proportion of top degrees being awarded has begun to return to pre-Covid levels. In 2022/23, 30% of students of UK higher education (HE) providers qualified with a first class honours first degree, down from 32% in 2021/22 and 36% in 2020/21. This is still an increase on the 22% qualifying with a first class honours first degree in 2014/15.
The Office for Students (OfS) is the independent regulator of HE providers in England. The department is working with the OfS to ensure vigilance about any concerns over grade irregularities which would damage the reputation of HE in England.
In 2022/23, the OfS opened 14 investigations into providers based on regulatory intelligence relating to quality. It has to date published 11 reports on these assessments. The investigations to examine the reasons for sharp increases in the rates of students being awarded first class and upper second class honours degrees at three providers are ongoing. The OfS also publishes an annual report of degree classifications over time, which analyses graduate attainment rates and uses statistical modelling to assess to what extent the increases and decreases in these rates could be statistically accounted for by changes in the prior attainment of, and distribution of subjects studied by, graduate populations.
Details of the specific special aides/equipment an individual claims payment for is stored as descriptive free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and to provide it would incur a disproportionate cost.
Details of the specific special aides/equipment an individual claims payment for is stored as descriptive free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and to provide it would incur a disproportionate cost.
Details of the specific special aides/equipment an individual claims payment for is stored as descriptive free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and to provide it would incur a disproportionate cost.
Details of the specific special aides/equipment an individual claims payment for is stored as descriptive free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and to provide it would incur a disproportionate cost.
Details of the specific special aides/equipment an individual claims payment for is stored as descriptive free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and to provide it would incur a disproportionate cost.
This data is not held. Determining this would require a manual review of individual claimant applications to examine employment details, which would incur a disproportionate cost.
No estimate has been made on the impact of AI on the number of individuals who will claim health and disability benefits over the course of this Parliament.
To access Universal Credit a person must be British, Irish, have a right of abode, or have a valid UK immigration status that permits recourse to public funds as well as meeting all the other entitlement conditions. The Department recently published Universal Credit Immigration status and Nationality summary statistics through ODS tables on GOV.UK.
For statistical production purposes, immigration status data has been categorised into 8 groups (see attached document).
Taken from the published statistics, the following table shows the number of people on Universal Credit by immigration status for each month from August 2024 to July 2025. The additional breakdowns requested for the EU Settlement Scheme are not readily available and to provide them would incur disproportionate cost.
Total number of people on Universal Credit by Immigration status each month from August 2024 to July 2025, Great Britain
Immigration status by month | CTA - UK, Ireland, Right of Abode | EU Settlement Scheme | Humanitarian | Refugee | Indefinite Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) | Limited Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) including Family Reunion | Other | No immigration status recorded on digital systems |
Jul-25 | 6,702,864 | 770,213 | 54,259 | 120,040 | 213,666 | 75,471 | 33,387 | 31,340 |
Jun-25 | 6,567,506 | 764,429 | 53,810 | 117,623 | 210,513 | 74,694 | 32,998 | 29,912 |
May-25 | 6,457,433 | 763,687 | 78,323 | 90,709 | 208,348 | 74,322 | 32,880 | 30,789 |
Apr-25 | 6,400,356 | 765,451 | 78,780 | 90,217 | 204,378 | 75,506 | 33,300 | 31,468 |
Mar-25 | 6,321,762 | 764,489 | 76,418 | 91,350 | 198,973 | 76,960 | 32,829 | 32,315 |
Feb-25 | 6,249,383 | 762,478 | 75,466 | 90,619 | 194,303 | 76,918 | 32,866 | 33,054 |
Jan-25 | 6,138,815 | 757,768 | 68,526 | 95,882 | 187,556 | 77,237 | 31,908 | 34,060 |
Dec-24 | 6,104,580 | 759,179 | 53,291 | 112,472 | 179,482 | 79,539 | 32,141 | 34,792 |
Nov-24 | 6,034,441 | 755,941 | 52,210 | 113,186 | 165,869 | 86,973 | 31,783 | 35,770 |
Oct-24 | 5,935,808 | 748,299 | 51,214 | 110,816 | 160,615 | 89,054 | 30,840 | 37,059 |
Sep-24 | 5,862,022 | 739,155 | 51,132 | 110,535 | 159,504 | 88,326 | 29,957 | 38,184 |
Aug-24 | 5,760,130 | 734,637 | 51,309 | 110,834 | 155,939 | 87,182 | 29,451 | 39,332 |
Source: Universal Credit Immigration status and nationality summary statistics
Notes
To access Universal Credit a person must be British, Irish, have a right of abode, or have a valid UK immigration status that permits recourse to public funds as well as meeting all the other entitlement conditions. The Department recently published Universal Credit Immigration status and Nationality summary statistics through ODS tables on GOV.UK.
For statistical production purposes, immigration status data has been categorised into 8 groups (further details provided in Table Guidance in the attached document).
Taken from the published statistics, the following table shows the number of people on Universal Credit by immigration status for each April from 2022 to 2025. Data is not held prior to April 2022.
Total number of people on Universal Credit by Immigration status for April 2022 to April 2025, Great Britain
Immigration status by month | CTA – UK, Ireland, Right of Abode | EU Settlement Scheme | Humanitarian | Refugee | Indefinite Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) | Limited Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) including Family Reunion | Other | No immigration status recorded on digital systems |
Apr-25 | 6,400,356 | 765,451 | 78,780 | 90,217 | 204,378 | 75,506 | 33,300 | 31,468 |
Apr-24 | 5,519,088 | 720,365 | 49,817 | 107,486 | 142,884 | 84,558 | 27,134 | 25,894 |
Apr-23 | 4,859,348 | 671,620 | 47,020 | 75,372 | 113,548 | 77,363 | 16,590 | 35,846 |
Apr-22 | 4,611,046 | 644,847 | 3,221 | 64,423 | 95,612 | 68,883 | 6,484 | 51,600 |
Source: Universal Credit Immigration status and nationality summary statistics
Notes
The Department recently published new Universal Credit - Immigration Status and Nationality statistics. Further breakdowns of these statistics are not currently available.
The department does not hold data for other Working Age Benefits expenditure broken down by immigration status.
The Department recently published Universal Credit Immigration status and nationality summary statistics and the relevant information from those statistics is displayed in Table 1 below.
For the purpose of statistical production, immigration status data has been categorised into the following 8 groups:
Table 1: Number and proportion of People on Universal Credit by immigration status and employment status June 2025, Great Britain
Immigration status | Not in employment | % of all on UC | In employment | % of all on UC | Total |
CTA - UK, Ireland, Right of Abode | 4,418,544 | 56.3% | 2,148,966 | 27.4% | 6,567,506 |
EU Settlement Scheme | 403,956 | 5.1% | 360,473 | 4.6% | 764,429 |
Humanitarian | 32,085 | 0.4% | 21,726 | 0.3% | 53,810 |
Refugee | 90,403 | 1.2% | 27,214 | 0.3% | 117,623 |
Indefinite Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) | 141,958 | 1.8% | 68,558 | 0.9% | 210,513 |
Limited Leave to Remain (not EU Settlement Scheme) including family reunion | 50,010 | 0.6% | 24,692 | 0.3% | 74,694 |
Other | 21,705 | 0.3% | 11,289 | 0.1% | 32,998 |
No immigration status recorded on digital systems | 19,258 | 0.2% | 10,646 | 0.1% | 29,912 |
Total | 5,177,927 | 65.9% | 2,673,559 | 34.1% | 7,851,487 |
Source: Universal Credit Full Service (UCFS) Extract
Notes
The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) programme completed at the end of March 2017. In line with our information management process DWP retains programme information for 20 years from the date of the first document. However, some of the information is not easily accessible, would require time to retrieve and analyse, and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
From the available evidence we do have access to, records show that Sue Moore was appointed as the Senior Responsible Officer (SRO) for the programme in 2014 (Appointment letter: Senior Responsible Owner for the Personal Independence Payment Programme).
The annual Access to Work Official Statistics show expenditure on the Support Worker element within each financial year from 2007/08 to 2023/24. The latest publication can be found here: Access to Work statistics: April 2007 to March 2024 - GOV.UK
The below table shows expenditure, in real terms (2023/24 prices), on the Support Worker element type from 2019/20 to 2023/24. These figures can be found in Table 12a of the Access to Work Official Statistics:
Financial year | 2019/20 | 2020/21 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 |
Expenditure (£m) in real terms (2023/24 prices) | 104 | 88 | 121 | 136 | 178 |
When interpreting results, particularly comparing time periods, please be aware of the potential effect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic between 2020/21 and 2022/23.
Nominal expenditure for the Support Worker element type can be located in Table 12 of the Access to Work Official Statistics.
The table below shows the proportions of the Disability Living Allowance (DLA) caseload that have undergone a Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reassessment in each of the last five financial years (FY).
FY | 2019/20 | 2020/21 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 |
Percentage of caseload |
|
|
|
|
|
Children | 6.2 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 9.5 | 8.4 |
Adults | 22.1 | 7.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Total | 16.7 | 7.4 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 5.7 |
Points to note:
- Figures are for England and Wales only.
- Figures are split for children and adults. Adults include those of working age and those over state pension age.
- Reassessment statistics count individual people who have registered PIP claims that are classified as DLA reassessments, where there is a matching DLA record.
- Children are usually invited to claim PIP on or shortly after their 16th birthday. If they choose to apply for PIP this will be considered a reassessment.
Of all individuals who subsequently went on to apply for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), 37% were in employment in the month their PIP case was cleared.
Of those who were awarded PIP, 23% were still in employment after 12 months.
Notes:
Access to Work provides funding towards the cost of a range of equipment, these should be items that are beyond what would normally be required under an employer’s responsibility to provide reasonable adjustments. Information on specific items of Special Aids and Equipment (SAE) for which grants were approved is not readily available. This is stored as descriptive, free-text information and would require manual examination of individual applications to analyse and therefore falls outside of the costs limit. Expenditure on SAE was £21m in 2023/24, this was the third highest of all Access to Work elements and an 82% increase in real terms compared to the previous financial year.
The department published an estimated saving for the Government of having one extra disabled person in full-time work, in July 2023. This can be found in the Consultation outcome Occupational Health: Working Better.
For Government, having one extra disabled person in full-time work, rather than being out of work and fully reliant on benefits, would mean the Government could save an estimated £18,000 a year. It could give societal savings of £28,000 a year when considering increases in output, reductions in healthcare costs and increased travel. The societal savings could increase to £34,000 a year if including Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) impacts, or £36,000 a year if including subjective wellbeing impacts. For a disabled person working part-time, the equivalent figures could be a saving to the Government of £8,000 a year, and a societal saving of £15,000 a year, rising to £19,000 a year if including QALY impacts, or £20,000 a year if including subjective wellbeing impacts.
The department publishes a range of statistics from the Annual Population Survey (APS) on the employment of disabled people. This includes the number of disabled people who were employed by workplace size. Workplace size refers to the total number of employees at the respondent’s workplace, not just the section/department or the whole organization. The APS does not collect information on the size of the whole organization, therefore only analysis on workplace size can be provided. A full time-series from 2013/14 can be found in the employment of disabled people 2024 supplementary table EMP006.
Number of disabled people in employment by workplace size, aged 16 to 64, UK
Workplace size | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 |
Small (less than 50 employees) | 1,919,144 | 2,036,454 | 2,080,529 |
Medium (between 50 and 250 employees) | 909,827 | 917,802 | 970,471 |
Large (more than 250 employees) | 1,117,175 | 1,168,427 | 1,332,062 |
Don't know but between 50 and 500 employees | 190,401 | 204,425 | 199,334 |
Source: The employment of disabled people 2024: Table EMP006
The number and proportion of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments carried out (a) face-to-face (b) remotely (this includes telephone and video) and (c) paper-based can be found in the tables below.
March 2020 to December 2020
Month | Face-to-Face | Remote | Paper-Based | Unspecified | ||||
| Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion |
Mar-20 | 0 | 0% | 13,610 | 46% | 15,980 | 54% | 0 | 0% |
Apr-20 | 0 | 0% | 38,090 | 73% | 13,970 | 27% | 0 | 0% |
May-20 | 0 | 0% | 42,830 | 82% | 9,460 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Jun-20 | 0 | 0% | 47,000 | 86% | 7,760 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
Jul-20 | 0 | 0% | 52,440 | 87% | 7,950 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
Aug-20 | 0 | 0% | 48,370 | 87% | 7,500 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
Sep-20 | 0 | 0% | 53,690 | 83% | 11,120 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Oct-20 | 0 | 0% | 59,110 | 81% | 14,000 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
Nov-20 | 0 | 0% | 53,740 | 82% | 11,860 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Dec-20 | 0 | 0% | 46,120 | 82% | 10,010 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
2021
Month | Face-to-Face | Remote | Paper-Based | Unspecified | ||||
| Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion |
Jan-21 | 0 | 0% | 53,730 | 83% | 10,970 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Feb-21 | 0 | 0% | 52,860 | 83% | 10,480 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Mar-21 | 0 | 0% | 60,160 | 85% | 10,800 | 15% | 0 | 0% |
Apr-21 | 0 | 0% | 48,670 | 83% | 9,760 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
May-21 | 0 | 0% | 46,280 | 82% | 9,840 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Jun-21 | 10 | 0% | 51,140 | 83% | 10,490 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Jul-21 | 50 | 0% | 52,000 | 83% | 10,810 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Aug-21 | 2,430 | 4% | 46,240 | 79% | 9,930 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Sep-21 | 5,340 | 8% | 50,290 | 76% | 10,590 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
Oct-21 | 5,190 | 8% | 50,510 | 76% | 10,520 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
Nov-21 | 5,640 | 8% | 55,470 | 76% | 11,500 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
Dec-21 | 3,730 | 6% | 44,180 | 77% | 9,440 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
2022
Month | Face-to-Face | Remote | Paper-Based | Unspecified | ||||
| Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion |
Jan-22 | 90 | 0% | 61,300 | 83% | 12,170 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
Feb-22 | 3,150 | 4% | 58,070 | 78% | 13,170 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Mar-22 | 6,390 | 8% | 63,230 | 75% | 15,050 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Apr-22 | 5,100 | 7% | 53,580 | 75% | 12,950 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
May-22 | 5,690 | 7% | 63,750 | 77% | 13,710 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
Jun-22 | 5,480 | 7% | 58,730 | 75% | 13,790 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Jul-22 | 5,350 | 7% | 59,420 | 75% | 14,380 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
Aug-22 | 5,950 | 7% | 60,870 | 73% | 14,910 | 18% | 1,990 | 2% |
Sep-22 | 6,450 | 8% | 60,050 | 71% | 15,540 | 18% | 2,480 | 3% |
Oct-22 | 7,080 | 8% | 63,190 | 71% | 15,990 | 18% | 2,190 | 2% |
Nov-22 | 7,540 | 8% | 68,890 | 71% | 18,340 | 19% | 2,260 | 2% |
Dec-22 | 5,260 | 7% | 50,500 | 71% | 13,810 | 19% | 2,030 | 3% |
2023
Month | Face-to-Face | Remote | Paper-Based | Unspecified | ||||
| Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion |
Jan-23 | 6,150 | 6% | 70,490 | 73% | 17,750 | 18% | 2,310 | 2% |
Feb-23 | 6,880 | 8% | 63,600 | 71% | 17,420 | 19% | 2,210 | 2% |
Mar-23 | 7,210 | 7% | 75,650 | 72% | 20,200 | 19% | 2,480 | 2% |
Apr-23 | 6,610 | 8% | 57,590 | 70% | 16,260 | 20% | 2,080 | 3% |
May-23 | 7,290 | 8% | 66,110 | 70% | 18,600 | 20% | 2,340 | 2% |
Jun-23 | 7,400 | 7% | 71,570 | 71% | 19,800 | 20% | 2,450 | 2% |
Jul-23 | 7,480 | 8% | 68,910 | 71% | 18,270 | 19% | 2,530 | 3% |
Aug-23 | 7,950 | 8% | 68,420 | 69% | 20,440 | 21% | 2,420 | 2% |
Sep-23 | 7,440 | 8% | 68,990 | 70% | 19,690 | 20% | 2,540 | 3% |
Oct-23 | 7,700 | 7% | 73,240 | 70% | 21,110 | 20% | 2,790 | 3% |
Nov-23 | 7,400 | 7% | 76,030 | 70% | 22,250 | 20% | 2,850 | 3% |
Dec-23 | 5,430 | 7% | 52,740 | 70% | 14,810 | 20% | 2,420 | 3% |
January 2024 to November 2024
Month | Face-to-Face | Remote | Paper-Based | Unspecified | ||||
| Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion |
Jan-24 | 6,650 | 6% | 74,750 | 72% | 20,030 | 19% | 2,680 | 3% |
Feb-24 | 7,260 | 7% | 75,730 | 73% | 17,750 | 17% | 3,110 | 3% |
Mar-24 | 6,460 | 7% | 69,570 | 73% | 17,010 | 18% | 2,370 | 2% |
Apr-24 | 5,910 | 6% | 73,580 | 74% | 17,210 | 17% | 2,210 | 2% |
May-24 | 5,630 | 6% | 74,400 | 74% | 18,210 | 18% | 2,010 | 2% |
Jun-24 | 5,330 | 6% | 71,410 | 74% | 17,450 | 18% | 1,940 | 2% |
Jul-24 | 5,650 | 5% | 78,000 | 74% | 19,260 | 18% | 2,150 | 2% |
Aug-24 | 3,430 | 4% | 72,040 | 77% | 16,980 | 18% | 1,180 | 1% |
Sep-24 | 1,270 | 2% | 59,780 | 81% | 12,660 | 17% | 180 | 0% |
Oct-24 | 2,580 | 2% | 82,890 | 79% | 18,430 | 18% | 400 | 0% |
Nov-24 | 3,620 | 4% | 70,810 | 77% | 16,410 | 18% | 1,350 | 1% |
Please Note
Estimates of the number of individuals who received a payment for an Access to Work element, by employer size, at the end of each of the last three financial years, are provided in the table below.
Employer Size | End of March 2022 | End of March 2023 | End of March 2024 |
Small (0-49 employees) | 8,180 | 10,770 | 17,480 |
Medium (50-249 employees) | 2,680 | 3,190 | 4,420 |
Large (250 or more employees) | 18,330 | 20,690 | 27,880 |
Missing | 180 | 150 | 140 |
Total | 29,370 | 34,800 | 49,920 |
These figures are rounded to the nearest 10 and do not include payments for an Access to Work assessment. Data on the number of Access to Work recipients by employer size is not directly recorded in the Access to Work admin datasets, so these estimates are derived from information which may provide insights to employer size. They may change in future as a consequence of subsequent system updates or changes to methodology.
Table 6 of the latest Access to Work Official Statistics includes the number of individuals who were in receipt of Access to Work Provision within each financial year. The latest publication can be found here: Access to Work statistics: April 2007 to March 2024 - GOV.UK
The information requested about the number of individuals who received a payment for AtW provision by sector is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.
The Government is committed to putting the National Health Service on a sustainable financial footing. The Government has taken the difficult decisions to protect and invest in the NHS. As announced at 2025 Budget, the Government is investing an additional £15 billion in NHS resource funding in real terms, a £29 billion cash increase, by 2028/29, compared with 2025/26. The 2025 Budget also confirmed that the Department’s capital budgets will rise to £15.2 billion by the end of the Spending Review period, 2029/30, to invest in the NHS and wider health infrastructure.
The Government’s assessment is that long-term financial sustainability requires reform alongside investment, as highlighted by Lord Darzi’s 2024 independent investigation into the NHS in England. In July 2025 the Government set out our plans for reform in the 10-Year Health Plan to ensure that the NHS has long-term sustainability by: shifting from hospital to community care through neighbourhood health to deliver care that is more cost-effective; shifting from analogue to digital with up to £10 billion of investment in NHS technology and transformation to boost productivity; and shifting from sickness to prevention to reduce demand on the health service.
The Government also announced in March 2025 that it will transform the centre of the health and care system, including through abolishing NHS England, following passage of legislation, subject to the will of Parliament. Along with renewing the role of integrated care boards as strategic commissioners, these reforms will cut bureaucracy and save more than £1 billion a year.
The Government strongly believes in the founding principles of the National Health Service, as a publicly funded service that is universal, and free at the point of use. Through the 10-Year Health Plan, the Government is committed to seeing this model thrive in the modern age. The plan focuses on delivering what matters to patients and taxpayers by transforming the model of care, rather than the model of funding, including through three shifts of moving from hospital to community, from sickness to prevention, and from analogue to digital.
The Government has therefore not undertaken an assessment of introducing a universal compulsory social insurance model for healthcare in the United Kingdom, nor does it have any plans to move away from a tax-funded NHS.
The Government strongly believes in the founding principles of the National Health Service, as a publicly funded service that is universal, and free at the point of use. Through the 10-Year Health Plan, the Government is committed to seeing this model thrive in the modern age. The plan focuses on delivering what matters to patients and taxpayers by transforming the model of care, rather than the model of funding, including through three shifts of moving from hospital to community, from sickness to prevention, and from analogue to digital.
The Government has therefore not undertaken an assessment of introducing a universal compulsory social insurance model for healthcare in the United Kingdom, nor does it have any plans to move away from a tax-funded NHS.
We will work constructively with all unions to improve working conditions for staff working in the National Health Service, avoid strike action, and build an NHS fit for the future.
On 22 March, a comprehensive offer developed with the British Medical Association’s Resident Doctor Committee’s (BMA RDC) leadership was made by the Government to the wider BMA RDC which addressed their concerns about their pay, their career progression, and their working lives. It is enormously disappointing for NHS patients and staff that they rejected this offer and called for further strike action. However, there is still a deal on the table, and our door is open to the BMA RDC as we seek to resolve this dispute.
The priority during any industrial action is to keep patients as safe as possible by minimising the impact of strikes. The NHS works hard to prioritise resources to protect emergency treatment, critical care, neonatal care, maternity services, and trauma care during strike periods, while also prioritising patients who have waited the longest for elective care and cancer surgery.
An operational response led by NHS England was stood up in advance of strike action to prepare for and mitigate impacts, with NHS England working closely with trusts and local systems on contingency planning and operational readiness.
Thanks to careful planning and the dedication of NHS staff, the NHS has previously been able to maintain approximately 95% of planned care during some strike periods, while continuing to deliver critical services.
Since 2023, there have been 65 strike days, including three rounds of five day industrial action in July, November, and December for 2025. We have estimated that resident doctor industrial action for 2025 cost £50 million per day. Overall costs are therefore approximately £3 billion, recognising that strikes in earlier years cost less due to subsequent inflation.
Improving National Health Service staff’s health and wellbeing is a priority, recognising the link between workforce wellbeing, attendance, and high-quality patient care.
NHS England is supporting organisations to strengthen their culture, improve working conditions, and expand access to high quality occupational health and wellbeing services.
As set out in the 10-Year Health Plan, we will roll out Staff Treatment hubs to ensure all staff have access to high quality occupational health support, including for mental health and musculoskeletal conditions, the two main causes of sickness absence in the NHS.
To further support this ambition, we are working with the Social Partnership Forum to introduce a new set of staff standards for modern employment.
Improving National Health Service staff’s health and wellbeing is a priority, recognising the link between workforce wellbeing, attendance, and high-quality patient care.
NHS England is supporting organisations to strengthen their culture, improve working conditions, and expand access to high quality occupational health and wellbeing services.
As set out in the 10-Year Health Plan, we will roll out Staff Treatment hubs to ensure all staff have access to high quality occupational health support, including for mental health and musculoskeletal conditions, the two main causes of sickness absence in the NHS.
To further support this ambition, we are working with the Social Partnership Forum to introduce a new set of staff standards for modern employment.
Employers across the National Health Service have their own arrangements in place in line with their duty of care for supporting their staff, including occupational health provision, employee support programmes, and board level scrutiny through health and wellbeing guardians.
The 10-Year Health Plan committed to the roll out of Staff Treatment Hubs, to provide a high-quality, wellbeing and occupational health service for all NHS staff, including musculoskeletal conditions, one of the main causes of sickness absence in the NHS. Work is underway to develop implementation plans for the Staff Treatments Hubs.
We are also working with Nuffield Health to support NHS staff to access their Joint Pain Programme. The programme is aimed at those staff who are off work due to chronic joint pain or struggling with pain whilst at work and will create up to 4,000 free places annually.