Lord Godson Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Godson

Information between 15th July 2026 - 23rd September 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 34 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 38 Noes - 133
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 146 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146
22 Jul 2026 - Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decisions and Appeals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 56 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 95
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 119 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 188
15 Jul 2026 - Sporting Events Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 171
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Godson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109


Written Answers
Terrorism
Asked by: Lord Godson (Conservative - Life peer)
Wednesday 16th September 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have a formal procedure for responding when a person residing in the UK is designated or sanctioned by a foreign government on the basis of an alleged association with a terrorist organisation, particularly where that government is their security partner.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

There is no formal procedure for the UK to respond when a foreign government designates or sanctions a person residing in the UK. The precise consequences for affected individuals will depend on the nature of the acting country’s designation / sanctions regime and the particulars of the measures imposed. A decision by a foreign government to designate or sanction individuals is a matter for that government and such decisions are taken independently of the UK Government.

The UK takes designation, sanction, and proscription decisions independently in accordance with its own legal frameworks, evidential thresholds and national security assessments.

We continually review and strengthen our counter-terrorism capabilities whilst working closely with domestic and international partners to tackle terrorist threats. This Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security, and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.

Radicalism
Asked by: Lord Godson (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 18th September 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what the definition of sectarianism is in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government command paper Protecting What Matters: Towards a more confident, cohesive, and resilient United Kingdom, published on 9 March.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The Protecting What Matters social cohesion action plan does not set out a specific definition of sectarianism. The term is used to describe hostility, discrimination, intimidation or conflict between groups based on religious, ethnic or related communal identities that can undermine community cohesion and public order. The Government remains committed to promoting mutual respect and tackling all forms of hate, extremism and community division.

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: Public Consultation
Asked by: Lord Godson (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 14th September 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what the retention policy is for submissions made to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government during public consultations.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

The department retains information from public consultations only for as long as is necessary to fulfil the relevant business need and statutory requirements. The department's standard retention period for public consultation responses is two years from the consultation closing date, although this is a guideline rather than a fixed requirement, and the final retention period is determined on a case-by-case basis.

Retention decisions must comply with data protection principles, including data minimisation and storage limitation, ensuring personal data is kept only for as long as necessary. For example, confidential or sensitive personal information may require a shorter retention period and may be deleted or anonymised once analysis is complete.

The applicable retention period for personal information is normally set out in the published consultation documentation.




Lord Godson mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

7 Sep 2026, 4:39 p.m. - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
"Just wanted to come in then Lord godson and then "
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi - View Video - View Transcript
7 Sep 2026, 4:42 p.m. - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
"Lord Godson, just you had a follow up as well. "
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi - View Video - View Transcript
7 Sep 2026, 5:52 p.m. - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
"And Lord . Godson "
Derek Twigg - View Video - View Transcript
7 Sep 2026, 5:52 p.m. - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
"godson and Lord Watts are going to lead us into this . Lord godson. "
Lord Godson - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Introduction: Lord Singh of Solihull
1 speech (1 words)
Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Lords Chamber

Mentions:
1: None West Midlands, was introduced and took the oath, supported by Baroness Falkner of Margravine and Lord Godson - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Monday 7th September 2026
Oral Evidence - The Alan Turing Institute, King's College London, and National Quantum Computing Centre

National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Sedwill (in the Chair), Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom; Liam Byrne; Sarah Champion; Bill Esterson; Lord Godson

Monday 13th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), European Leadership Network (ELN), and Centre for European Reform (CER)

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom; Lord Boateng; Liam Byrne; Sarah Champion; Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi; Lord Godson

Monday 13th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Lieutenant General (Retired) Ben Hodges, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), and Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)

Found: Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom; Lord Boateng; Liam Byrne; Sarah Champion; Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi; Lord Godson




Lord Godson - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Monday 7th September 2026 4 p.m.
National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: AI and quantum computing in the national security context
At 4:30pm: Oral evidence
George Balston - Strategy Advisor at The Alan Turing Institute
Kenneth Payne - Professor of Strategy at King's College London
Dr Michael Cuthbert - Director at National Quantum Computing Centre
View calendar - Add to calendar
Monday 12th October 2026 4 p.m.
National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Monday 13th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Lieutenant General (Retired) Ben Hodges, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), and Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Monday 13th July 2026
Oral Evidence - Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), European Leadership Network (ELN), and Centre for European Reform (CER)

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 14th July 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Electoral Commission relating to the response to the Rycroft Review, dated 2 July 2026

National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Security Minister relating to the Government response to the NSS report, dated 25 August 2026

National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - RAND Europe
RUS0007 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Centre for the Study of Subversion, Unconventional Interventions and Threats, University of Nottingham
RUS0003 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Council on Geostrategy
RUS0010 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - King's College London
RUS0009 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Centre for Peace and Security, Coventry University, and Centre for Peace and Security, Coventry University
RUS0008 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Council on Geostrategy
RUS0010 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - King's College London
RUS0009 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - King's College London
RUS0001 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Centre for the Study of Subversion, Unconventional Interventions and Threats, University of Nottingham
RUS0003 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - Centre for Peace and Security, Coventry University, and Centre for Peace and Security, Coventry University
RUS0008 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - CCW, Pembroke College, Oxford
RUS0002 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Thursday 17th September 2026
Written Evidence - RAND Europe
RUS0007 - Deterrence in an age of Russian aggression

Societal resilience: a national conversation - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 22nd September 2026
Written Evidence - Thinking on Paper, and Thinking On Paper
ACE0004 - Space resilience

Space resilience - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 22nd September 2026
Written Evidence - Bluestaq Ltd
ACE0002 - Space resilience

Space resilience - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 22nd September 2026
Written Evidence - IAAPA - Independent Analysis and Policy Architecture
ACE0001 - Space resilience

Space resilience - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 22nd September 2026
Written Evidence - University of Strathclyde
ACE0005 - Space resilience

Space resilience - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)
Monday 7th September 2026
Oral Evidence - The Alan Turing Institute, King's College London, and National Quantum Computing Centre

National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)


Select Committee Inquiry
15 Jul 2026
Space resilience
National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) (Select)
Not accepting submissions

No description available



Scottish Calendar
Thursday 10th September 2026 9:10 a.m.
2nd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7)
The committee will meet at 9:10am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Declaration of interests: Steven Bonnar MSP will be invited to declare any relevant interests. 2. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 5 in private. 3. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology, and take evidence from—Clare Adamson MSP, Proposed Convener of the CPG on Science and Technology.  4. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology. 5. Work programme: The Committee will review its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected]
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 10th September 2026 9:15 a.m.
2nd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7)
The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 4 in private. 2. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology, and take evidence from—Clare Adamson MSP, Proposed Convener of the CPG on Science and Technology.  3. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Science and Technology. 4. Work programme: The Committee will review its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected]
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 24th September 2026 9 a.m.
3rd Meeting, 2026 (Session 7)
The committee will meet at 9:00am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decisions on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 2, 3 and 4 in private. 2. Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland: The Committee will consider a report from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. 3. Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland: The Committee will consider a request for a direction from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. 4. Work programme: The Committee will consider its work programme. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee via email at [email protected]
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 1st October 2026 9:15 a.m.
4th Meeting, 2026 (Session 7)
The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take item 7 in private. 2. Subordinate Legislation: The Committee will take evidence on — The Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 [draft]The Scottish Local Government Elections (Election Agents, Expenses and Publication of Information) Amendment Order 2026 [draft] from— Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans and Iain Hockenhull, Head of Elections, Scottish Government. Lorraine Walkinshaw, Lawyer, Scottish Government Legal Directorate. 3. Subordinate Legislation: Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans to move— S7M-01085—That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the The Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 [draft] be approved.S7M-01086—That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the The Scottish Local Government Elections (Election Agents, Expenses and Publication of Information) Amendment Order 2026 [draft] be approved.  4. Subordinate Legislation: The Committee will consider— The Representation of the People (Absent Voting at Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 (SSI 2026/251)The Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2026 (SSI 2026/254) 5. Scottish Local Government Elections (Candidacy Rights of Commonwealth Citizens) Bill – Stage 1 evidence: The Committee will take evidence from— Robert Nicol, President, Scottish Assessors Association. Chris Highcock, Secretary to the Board and Depute Returning Officer for the City of Edinburgh, Electoral Management Board for Scotland. 6. Representation of the People Bill (UK Parliament Legislation) – evidence: The Committee will take evidence on legislative consent memorandums LCM-S6-74, LCM-S7-7, LCM-S7-7a and LCM-S7-7b from— Robert Nicol, Electoral Registration Officer and Chris Highcock, Secretary to the Board and Depute Returning Officer for the City of Edinburgh, Electoral Management Board for Scotland. Professor Toby James, Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of East Anglia UK. 7. Review of evidence: The Committee will review the evidence it heard under agenda items 5 and 6. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee on [email protected]
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 8th October 2026 9:15 a.m.
5th Meeting, 2026 (Session 7)
The committee will meet at 9:15am at Committee Room 3 and will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv. 1. Decisions on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 6, 7 and 8 in private. 2. Cross-Party Group: The Committee will consider an application for recognition from the proposed Cross-Party Group on Ireland, and take evidence from— Patricia Gibson, Proposed Convener of Cross-Party Group on Ireland, Scottish Parliament. 3. Cross-Party Group - approval: The Committee will decide whether to accord recognition to the proposed Cross-Party Group on Ireland. 4. Scottish Local Government Elections (Candidacy Rights of Commonwealth Citizens) Bill – Stage 1 evidence: The Committee will take evidence from— Professor Toby James, Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of East Anglia UK; Professor Alistair Clark, Professor of Political Science, Newcastle University; Andy Hunter, Chair of the Scotland and Northern Ireland Branch, Association of Electoral Administrators; and then from— Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans, Iain Hockenhull, Head of Elections, and Angus Reid-Bryan, Elections Team, Scottish Government. Lorraine Walkinshaw, Lawyer, Scottish Government Legal Directorate. 5. Subordinate legislation: The Committee will consider the Representation of the People (Absent Voting at Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2026 [SSI 2026/263] 6. Review of evidence: The Committee will consider the evidence it heard under agenda item 4. 7. Temporary Standing Order Rule Changes: The Committee will consider its approach to scrutiny of the Presiding Officer's temporary changes to Standing Orders.  8. Complaint: The Committee will continue its consideration of a report from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. For further information, contact the Clerk to the Committee on email at [email protected].
View calendar - Add to calendar