Community Engagement Principles and Extremism Definition

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Tuesday 21st January 2025

(2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As we know, the world is a fast-moving and scary place, and people who feel disempowered and isolated often turn to the internet. They are often vulnerable, and their reliance on the internet for everything in their world puts them at even greater risk. We must work with our community leaders to make the most of the information that they hold, and get early notice of problems.

What worries me is that if we make assumptions and do not work with our communities, there is a risk of authoritarian decision making that affects all of us. What consultation has there been with communities on the changes, and what additional burdens might fall on local authorities following changes to how the Government work? Furthermore, with such extreme things taking place online, especially on the platforms of social media giants based across the pond, what are the Government actively doing to unite faith and cultural leaders, environmental groups, industries and people across generations to foster unity and stop extremism across the whole spectrum?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Monday 20th January 2025

(2 weeks, 1 day ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I refer the House to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests as a serving councillor on Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council.

Many councils have already undergone significant reorganisation, from moving to shared services right the way through to full unitarisation, and the costs of that have always been underestimated. Although transformation leads to lower long-term revenue costs, we know that councils everywhere are teetering on the edge, so finding funds to pay for reorganisation, transformation and redundancies will be problematic. The mayoral authorities add an extra complication, so can the Minister confirm that funding from central Government will be provided to fully cover both devolution and local government reorganisation, so that councils do not have to factor extra costs into their 2025-26 and 2026-27 budgets or risk reducing local services further?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Thursday 9th January 2025

(3 weeks, 5 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The residents of Wareham, just along the way from Bournemouth, have been waiting more than 20 years for electronic gates—

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. This is a very niche question.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is a very niche question, and I want to ask about the next railway line along from Bournemouth.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

In which case, it does not count. Thank you for that clarification. Let us go to topical questions.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Monday 2nd December 2024

(2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

We now come to the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope that you will endure us, Mr Speaker. Dorset council, which covers half my constituency, has agreed to work with Somerset and Wiltshire—all unitary councils—on a devolution arrangement, but residents are already raising concerns that top-down reorganisation will take decisions further away from their homes and communities. They are worried about what a mayoral combined authority might do to them. What assurances can the Minister give that the town and parish councils, on which residents rely so heavily, will not be expected to keep unitary councils afloat, and that my residents will not see back-door council tax rises as a result of the changes?

--- Later in debate ---
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My constituent, Dom, purchased a high-rise building that, it now transpires, does not meet building regulations on combustible materials used in the early 2000s. His building is being remediated, but the materials are being allowed to remain, locking in the risk for the long term and sending insurance premiums sky high. Why are the Government not investigating historic non-compliance? What is being done to protect homeowners from unfair losses and sky-high insurance premiums?

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We do not need to choose between palliative care and supporting those who want to make their deaths better. It is so fantastic to hear Members from every part of the Chamber with a shared commitment to funding more palliative care, and I hope that the Secretary of State and his team hear that and will go further, knowing that they have our support in investing more. But until they do, we cannot condemn those who are at the end of life to terror, loneliness and being forced into horrible circumstances.

I have been concerned by some of the comments in the debate, so I re-read the Bill as I sat here. It has been suggested that mental health conditions would be included, but they would not—under clause 2(3). It was also suggested that people might not be offered surgery or other treatment, but they must, under clause 4(4). It is also worth noting the suggestion that a person being coerced could be protected by disclosing to the very family that might be coercing them. The provision for a witness in clause 5(2)(c)(ii) and the period of reflection would allow the independent person to be present at the appropriate time.

I have already shared publicly my own family’s death journeys—and I wear them on my jacket—but today is not about them. Today is about all those people who need this Bill. Last night I read the book “Die Smiling”, about Nigel’s journey to Dignitas. It ends with his final journey and a Facebook post, prepared before he made that agonising 20-hour journey to Switzerland with his wife and children. It moved me to tears. However, most people cannot afford that option. Most do not want to put their families at risk of prosecution; they want death on their own terms.

Gary lives in my constituency, and he asked me to tell the House his story of dying with liver cancer. He knows that the end stages will be brutal, and he wants to decide when enough is enough. He me:

“Death does not worry me at all. Dying a slow death with my dignity stripped away terrifies me. So when my time is right I will kill myself—alone and afraid. My sick dog will not have to die alone and afraid, but I am forced to do so. I want to die on my terms. How can this be right?”

Tracie, who was a palliative care nurse, told me:

“I’ve witnessed many end of life patients and I cannot say hand on heart that many of those patients had a peaceful death. I left palliative nursing as the emotional trauma became too much. There are neither the range of medication or symptom relief treatments available for many of the harrowing things people are forced to go through in their last days and weeks of their life.”

This Bill is about compassion and humanity, and we must listen to the voices of dying people.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the shadow Minister.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lindsay Hoyle and Vikki Slade
Monday 28th October 2024

(3 months, 1 week ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Rough sleeping is the most visible end of the homelessness crisis, but it is also brutal—the average age of death for rough sleepers in London is just 44. The rough sleeping initiative is literally saving lives—in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, 102 people are kept alive every year through that programme—but it is due to end in March 2025. Removing it has been described by local teams as nothing short of catastrophic, so what assessment has taken place of the impact of that initiative, and what assurance can the Secretary of State give local authorities about the maintenance of the scheme so that they can plan for the long term?

--- Later in debate ---
Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

Vikki Slade Portrait Vikki Slade (Mid Dorset and North Poole) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

High streets are the beating hearts of our communities. Those in places such as Broadstone in my constituency are really bouncing back and reinventing themselves. The public assume that councils are able to flex business rates and that they own most properties, but we all know that that is not the case. Will the Minister provide a timeline for the reform of business rates, and assure pubs and shops that their existing reliefs will be maintained?