Ian Davidson

Labour (Co-op) - Former Member for Glasgow South West

First elected: 9th April 1992

Left House: 30th March 2015 (Defeated)


Ian Davidson is not a member of any APPGs
Liaison Committee (Commons)
19th Jul 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Scottish Affairs Committee
10th Jun 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Scottish Affairs Committee
12th Jul 2005 - 30th Mar 2015
Public Accounts Committee
25th Jul 1997 - 6th May 2010


Division Voting information

Ian Davidson has voted in 1564 divisions, and 47 times against the majority of their Party.

20 Jan 2015 - Trident Renewal - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 101 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 364
26 Sep 2014 - Iraq: Coalition Against ISIL - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour No votes vs 190 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 524 Noes - 43
22 Jan 2014 - Commission Work Programme 2014 - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour No votes vs 59 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 20
13 Jan 2014 - European Union (Approvals) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 108 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 30
5 Jul 2013 - European Union (Referendum) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 30 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 30
24 Oct 2011 - National Referendum on the European Union - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 214 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 483
13 Oct 2011 - Procedure Committee Reports - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 56 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 206
10 Mar 2011 - Inter-Parliamentary Scrutiny (EU Foreign, Defence and Security Policy) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 13 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 118 Noes - 4
9 Feb 2011 - Domestic Heating Oil - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 18 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 45
15 Jun 2010 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 29 Labour No votes vs 83 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 331
3 Jul 2008 - Members’ Salaries - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 82 Labour Aye votes vs 136 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 196
3 Jul 2008 - Members’ Salaries - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 66 Labour Aye votes vs 159 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 141 Noes - 216
3 Jul 2008 - Members’ Salaries - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 62 Labour Aye votes vs 152 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 123 Noes - 224
11 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 288 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 346 Noes - 206
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 299 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 311
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour Aye votes vs 299 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 311
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 299 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 355 Noes - 218
4 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 286 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 471
4 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour Aye votes vs 273 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 329
4 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 295 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 307
3 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour No votes vs 273 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 148
3 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 272 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 152
27 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 278 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 342 Noes - 156
26 Feb 2008 - Treaty of Lisbon (No. 7) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour Aye votes vs 288 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 299
26 Feb 2008 - Treaty of Lisbon (No. 7) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 286 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168
26 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 277 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 285
26 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 283 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 300
20 Feb 2008 - Treaty of Lisbon (No. 5) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 277 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 346
20 Feb 2008 - Treaty of Lisbon (No. 5) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour No votes vs 276 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 163
20 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 272 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 331
29 Jan 2008 - Lisbon Treaty (No.1) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour Aye votes vs 291 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 360
29 Jan 2008 - Lisbon Treaty (No.1) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 290 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 360 Noes - 167
29 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 289 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 353
29 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 288 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 352
28 Jan 2008 - Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 295 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 303
28 Jan 2008 - Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 291 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 243
21 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 298 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 224
15 Jan 2008 - European Communities (Finance) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour No votes vs 294 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 208
19 Nov 2007 - European Communities (Finance) Bill - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 295 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 215
14 Mar 2007 - Trident - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 94 Labour Aye votes vs 226 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 413
14 Mar 2007 - Trident - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 89 Labour No votes vs 222 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 409 Noes - 161
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 162 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 416 Noes - 163
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour Aye votes vs 177 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 392
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour Aye votes vs 157 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 267
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 96 Labour No votes vs 207 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 224
26 Oct 2006 - A Citizens’ Agenda - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour No votes vs 219 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 134
17 Oct 2006 - Gambling Act 2005 (Amendment) - View Vote Context
Ian Davidson voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 46 Labour No votes vs 49 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 240
View All Ian Davidson Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
David Mundell (Conservative)
(37 debate interactions)
John Bercow (Speaker)
(16 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Scotland Office
(90 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(79 debate contributions)
Ministry of Defence
(31 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Ian Davidson has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Ian Davidson's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Ian Davidson

18th March 2015
Ian Davidson signed this EDM on Monday 23rd March 2015

MEASURING THE COST OF LIVING

Tabled by: Frank Doran (Labour - Aberdeen North)
That this House believes that the Retail Price Index (RPI) remains the most accurate measure of the rise in the cost of living faced by UK workers; notes that over many decades the majority of pay bargaining in the UK has traditionally taken the RPI as its main reference point …
47 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 20
Independent: 2
The Independent Group for Change: 1
Green Party: 1
12th March 2015
Ian Davidson signed this EDM on Monday 23rd March 2015

VAT ON WOMEN'S SANITARY PRODUCTS

Tabled by: Charlotte Leslie (Conservative - Bristol North West)
That this House is concerned about the level of Value Added Tax (VAT) levied on women's sanitary products, such as tampons and sanitary towels; notes that, whilst female sanitary products are subject to a five per cent rate of VAT, shaving razors are subject to a zero per cent rate, …
70 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 21
Conservative: 5
Independent: 2
Democratic Unionist Party: 1
Liberal Democrat: 1
The Independent Group for Change: 1
Green Party: 1
Scottish National Party: 1
View All Ian Davidson's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Ian Davidson, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Ian Davidson has not been granted any Urgent Questions

Ian Davidson has not been granted any Adjournment Debates

Ian Davidson has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Ian Davidson has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 30 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
4 Other Department Questions
27th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps he has taken to encourage retailers to stock more Fairtrade products and adopt Fairtrade principles.

The power of Fairtrade, championed by some of Britain's best brands, is undeniable. While it remains a commercial decision on whether or not to stock Fairtrade products and adopt Fairtrade Principles, sales of Fairtrade products in the UK rose by 14% in 2013/14 to £1.78bn.

Policy on Fairtrade products rests with the Department for International Development who have invested £18 million over six years in Fairtrade in order to help open up new markets in harder to reach places and also to break down trade barriers faced by women.

For our part, we are working with the British Retail Consortium to develop guidance which sets out how retailers can apply appropriate due diligence and reporting in respect of their supply chains to ensure that consideration is given to the manner in which goods are brought to market.

Enabling the world's poorest people to get a fair price for what they produce helps end poverty and also creates tomorrow's new markets for us to trade with.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps he is taking to encourage employers to keep on staff initially hired on a temporary basis.

Investing in a permanent workforce can have business benefits, however it is for employers and individuals to decide whether this is appropriate in any given situation. The Government has taken some steps to encourage more individuals to discuss different working patterns with their employer where it suits them. As of 30 June last year, all employees with 26 weeks’ continuous service can make a statutory request to change their working pattern, for instance to request permanent hours. This is in addition to the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 which ensure all agency workers are entitled to information about relevant job vacancies within the hirer that would be available to a comparable employee or worker from day one of an assignment.

2nd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps his Department has taken that benefit micro enterprises in Glasgow South West constituency.

Small businesses are vital to our economy and our small business owners have driven this economic recovery. The Start-Up Loan Scheme has provided 18 loans, with a value of £44,515, to people starting a business in the Glasgow South West constituency.

We are committed to making Britain the best place in the world to start and grow a business, and are doing this in a number of ways:

  • £10 billion of financing will be unlocked for smaller business over the next 5 years by our British Business Bank;
  • Government grants of up to £3,000 for better internet connectivity are available to small businesses;
  • Growth Vouchers to help companies find and pay for professional strategic advice;
  • GREATbusiness.gov.uk brings together all Government advice, guidance and support in one place and businesses can speak to or webchat with a helpline adviser direct using the Business Support helpline;
  • £2,000 cut from the National Insurance bills of small firms through the Employment Allowance; and
  • Businesses with up to fifty employees and start-ups are exempted from new regulations.

26th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what recent steps his Department has taken to support the retail and wholesale industry.

Latest figures published the Office for National Statistics on 23rd January show that the value of retail sales (excluding automotive fuel) in 2014 totalled £339 billion. This is an all-time high for the UK and is £47 billion higher than 2010 in cash terms.

Retail is vitally important to local and national economies, which is why Government is actively working to help all retailers. In October 2013, BIS published "A Strategy for Future Retail"; it was developed in partnership with industry and built on the previous retail strategy. It comprises actions to address barriers to retail growth and performance, and to help retail prepare itself for the future.

The 2014 Autumn Statement announced a £1 billion package to reduce the cost of business rates, including continuing the 2% RPI multiplier cap and the doubling of the Small Business Rates Relief to April 2016, increasing the discount for smaller retail premises to £1,500 to March 2016, extending Transitional Rate Relief to March 2017 and changing the rules on when alterations to rateable values can only be backdated to. This £1 billion package builds on the £2.7 billion support package introduced at Autumn Statement 2013.

The Government is also supporting town centres across the country to revitalise their high streets. This includes banning CCTV for parking, allowing residents and firms to review parking policies, a freeze on parking penalty charges, a review of Business Improvement Districts, action on planning, and support for the digital high street and retail markets. This is on top of: £2.3 million to support the 27 Portas Pilots and 330 town teams across England, £10 million from the High Street Innovation Fund, and a £500, 000 loan fund for new Business Improvement Districts.

Retail and wholesale industries are able to benefit from the support that Government is offering to all sectors. My Rt hon Friend the Prime Minister recently announced the 25,000th Start Up Loan –over £129 million has been lent to people of all ages to start their own business. Government has created one of the most competitive tax regimes in the world and businesses have less regulation. There has been a £10 billion cumulative net saving to business over the course of this Parliament. Small businesses have better access to business advice and support. GREATbusiness.gov.uk brings together all Government advice, guidance and support in one place. And for those who are ready to really grow, the Business Growth Service brings together expert advice to improve and grow in one place for up to 20,000 firms each year with the ambition and capacity to grow.

12th Jan 2015
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what account he has made of the performance of the launch of MyCSP; what targets have been set for the delivery of this service; and whether they have been met to date.

The launch of MyCSP as a mutual joint venture (MJV) was reported in the Cabinet Office Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13.

The Cabinet Office has a contract with MyCSP Limited to provide pension administration services for the Civil Service pension scheme. MyCSP has met all key performance standards since February 2013. Overall performance is reviewed at regular contract meetings with officials and by the Civil Service Pensions Board which includes industry experts and nominees of Civil Service employers and scheme members.

Further to my answer of 8 January 2015 to the hon. Member for Leicester South about pre-existing issues, MyCSP took responsibility for the administration of the pensioner payroll from the previous supplier and inherited an unexpectedly large backlog of work. This caused a temporary dip in performance and some pension payments were delayed as a result. The Cabinet Office has instructed MyCSP to prioritise ensuring delayed payments are resolved quickly and returning service levels to normal as quickly as possible.

MyCSP vested as a MJV in May 2012 which permitted the injection of much needed new investment in IT, capability and technology into MyCSP. None of the recent service issues are as a result of the MJV model. The transformation this investment is enabling will allow MyCSP to deliver a wider range of services (including online services) to higher standards whilst halving the cost of pension administration within 10 years. Even before this transformation is fully completed (and whilst continuing to work with legacy systems and problems inherited from the predecessor organisation), MyCSP has improved productivity by 15% year-on-year since 2012, driven down staff absenteeism, while also improving staff engagement.

27th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she has taken to raise awareness of the Fairtrade movement in schools.

Awareness of the Fairtrade movement can be covered in Citizenship or as part of Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) education. Schools are free to decide what to include in their PSHE programmes and should tailor the content of PSHE lessons to take account of the needs and interests of their pupils.

26th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps her Department is taking to tackle the trade (a) in the UK and (b) internationally in illegal medicines made from endangered species.

The UK is a party to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which regulates international trade in endangered species. Tackling the illegal trade in products regulated under CITES, including Medicinal and Health Products, is one of the UK’s six current wildlife crime priorities.

In 2013 UK Border Force officers made 569 seizures under CITES regulations. Among the items seized were more than 700,000 units of medicines made from parts, or derivatives, of endangered species.

The UK Government is committed to working with our international partners to tackle the illegal wildlife trade. In February 2014 the UK hosted a major conference of global leaders to help eradicate the illegal wildlife trade and better protect some of the world’s most iconic species from the threat of extinction. Over 40 nations attended. The result was the London Conference Declaration, containing 25 commitments to action on enforcement and criminal justice, eradicating the market for illegal wildlife products and sustainable livelihoods.

We have designed a £10 million package, over four years, to support efforts around the world aimed at tackling the illegal wildlife trade. As part of this package, we are supporting projects which address the rising demand for illegal wildlife products, including demand for medicines made from endangered species, in China and Vietnam.

27th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, with reference to her Department's report, The Impact of EU Sugar Policy Reform on Developing Countries, published in February 2012, what steps her Department is taking to mitigate the effect of those reforms on those countries.

The sugar regime is one of the most heavily regulated and distorting elements of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and the agreement to end sugar beet quotas in 2017 is an important step towards removing these distortions.

Naturally, the Government is concerned by the effect that these reforms may have on sugar producers in African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries highlighted in the report. This is why we encouraged the European Commission to establish a Fund of Euro 1.24 billion in 2006 to assist sugar producing countries to adapt. My Department will continue to engage with the European Commission, the Private Sector, and ACP countries to maximise the impact of these funds. We will also ensure that ACP countries continue to benefit from preferential access to the EU sugar market.

26th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what additional funding her Department is providing to mitigate the refugee situation in northern Nigeria and surrounding areas.

The UK has provided £1 million to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Nigeria to deliver food, safe water, clothes, shelter material and other basic necessities to those people displaced following attacks by Boko Haram. A further £1 million of UK funding is committed to the Nigerian Government’s “Safe Schools Initiative” to help protect children at school in North East Nigeria and provide schooling to children displaced by the violence. The UK has also contributed £1.7 million to the UN’s and EU’s relief efforts in Nigeria.

In addition, the UK is providing humanitarian support across the Sahel region – including £8m in Niger and £5.5m in Chad - to in part help those countries address the refugee caseload from Nigeria.

27th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which franchised train operator paid the highest amount of corporation tax in each financial year from 2009-10 to 2013-14.

The Department does not hold the actual payment data for each franchised operator. However, the statutory accounts for each franchised operator can be used to provide a proxy for this payment with reference to the “Tax on profit on ordinary activities” in each Income statement and making the assumption that the tax is paid in that year.

On this basis the franchised train operator which paid the highest amount of corporation tax in each financial year from 2009-10 to 2013-14 is as follows

2009/10 West Coast Trains Limited

2010/11 Stagecoach South Western Trains Limited

2011/12 First/Keolis Transpennine Limited

2012//13 Stagecoach South Western Trains Limited

2013/14 Northern Rail Limited

27th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which franchised train operator has paid the highest level of corporation tax in the financial year 2014-15 to date.

The Department does not hold the actual payment data for each franchised operator. However the statutory accounts for each franchised operator can be used to provide a proxy for this payment with reference to the “Tax on profit on ordinary activities” in each Income statement and making the assumption that the tax is paid in that year.

On this basis, so far we do not have a complete picture for the financial year 2014-15, as we have received only one set of statutory accounts for a financial year ending in this period.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in receipt of housing benefit in Glasgow South West constituency are in part-time work.

The information requested is not available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in receipt of housing benefit in Glasgow South West constituency are in full-time work.

The information requested is not available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the target time is from the point of application for people with (a) cancer and (b) motor neurone disease to receive their benefit entitlement under the special rules for terminal illness.

I refer my Hon. Member to the reply given by the Department to his previous question number 223035, Official Report 09 February 2015.

20th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will estimate the number of people in Glasgow South West constituency who have found work after having had their benefits sanctioned in the last five years.

The information requested is not readily available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

3rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the current average time is from the point of application for people with (a) cancer and (b) motor neurone disease to receive their benefit entitlement under the special rules for terminal illness.

The information requested is not readily available for all special rules for the terminally ill benefits, and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.

For Personal Independence Payment new claims made under special rules for the terminally ill, please refer to the statistical ad hoc that was published on 28th January to support discussions at the Work and Pensions Select Committee.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-new-claims-ad-hoc-statistics

22nd Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in receipt of disability living allowance (a) have had their rate of entitlement changed, (b) have lost any entitlement and (c) no longer receive the mobility component since the transition to personal independent payments.

The latest available data on the number of successful or unsuccessful claims to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) by claimants previously in receipt of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) are available from the data tables accompanying the latest statistical release and published on Gov.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-april-2013-to-october-2014.

The Department intends to provide more detailed breakdowns of DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes in due course. The Department is working to guidelines set by the UK Statistics Authority to ensure we are able to publish statistics that meet high quality standards at the earliest opportunity.

22nd Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average length of time is for the completion of the mandatory reconsideration of disability living allowance claims in the latest period for which figures are available.

Detailed Information on DLA Mandatory Reconsideration clearance times is not available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

26th Feb 2015
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many employers were fined for not paying their employees the national minimum wage in 2013-14.

The Government takes the enforcement of the National Minimum Wage (NMW) very seriously and has increased the financial penalty percentage from 50% to 100% of the unpaid wages owed to workers, and the maximum penalty from £5,000 to £20,000. These new limits are now in force where arrears are identified in pay reference periods on or after 7 March 2014. The Government will also bring in primary legislation as soon as possible so that the maximum £20,000 penalty can apply to each underpaid worker.

I refer the honourable member to the answer provided at UIN 205613 for details of penalties issued.

24th Feb 2015
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many businesses are participating in the Employee Shareholder Status scheme in (a) Glasgow South West constituency, (b) Glasgow City Region, (c) Scotland and (d) the UK.

No details or estimates of the number of businesses or employees using the Employee Shareholder status within geographical regions or nationally are currently available.

24th Feb 2015
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the number of participants in the Employee Shareholder Status scheme in (a) Glasgow South West constituency, (b) Glasgow city region, (c) Scotland and (d) the UK.

No details or estimates of the number of businesses or employees using the Employee Shareholder status within geographical regions or nationally are currently available.

21st Jul 2014
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many people are employed in (a) the UK, (b) Scotland and (c) each Scottish parliamentary constituency by sub-contractors or agencies working on behalf of National Savings and Investments.

National Savings & Investments employ 165 people, of whom 8 work in Scotland. National Savings and Investment’s (NS&I) operational services are provided by Atos, with 1,528 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) people employed across the UK as of 13th August. Of these, 1,074 FTE are permanent staff, 430 FTE are agency staff (varied on demand) and 24 FTE are IT contractors from SOPRA. At present NS&I and Atos work at one office in Scotland at Cowglen (Constituency: Glasgow South) but will be moving to two new offices: Capella (Constituency: Glasgow Central) & Orbital (Constituencies: East Kilbride, Strathaven & Lesmahagow) in the near future.

The building at Cowglen is much larger than the current headcount of staff requires according to Government space standards. Our two new sites will provide for the anticipated future needs of NS&I operations in Glasgow.

With the introduction of the ‘Savings bonds for the 65s and over’ in January 2015 there will be a temporary increase in the number of staff to handle peak demand. Exact numbers are yet to be finalised and are still under discussion but some of these will be based in Glasgow Capella & Orbital.

The headcount and geographical breakdown as of 13 August 2014 is as follows:

Scotland, by constituency

Staff (all numbers Full Time Equivalent)

UK

Cowglen (Glasgow South) current

Capella (Glasgow Central) near future

Orbital (East Kilbride, Strathaven & Lesmahagow) near future

NS&I

165

8

8

0

Atos

1074 permanent

471 permanent

340 permanent

131 permanent

430

agency

188

agency

168

agency

21

agency

24

contractors (SOPRA)

21st Jul 2014
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many people are employed by National Savings and Investments in (a) the UK, (b) Scotland and (c) each Scottish parliamentary constituency.

National Savings & Investments employ 165 people, of whom 8 work in Scotland. National Savings and Investment’s (NS&I) operational services are provided by Atos, with 1,528 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) people employed across the UK as of 13th August. Of these, 1,074 FTE are permanent staff, 430 FTE are agency staff (varied on demand) and 24 FTE are IT contractors from SOPRA. At present NS&I and Atos work at one office in Scotland at Cowglen (Constituency: Glasgow South) but will be moving to two new offices: Capella (Constituency: Glasgow Central) & Orbital (Constituencies: East Kilbride, Strathaven & Lesmahagow) in the near future.

The building at Cowglen is much larger than the current headcount of staff requires according to Government space standards. Our two new sites will provide for the anticipated future needs of NS&I operations in Glasgow.

With the introduction of the ‘Savings bonds for the 65s and over’ in January 2015 there will be a temporary increase in the number of staff to handle peak demand. Exact numbers are yet to be finalised and are still under discussion but some of these will be based in Glasgow Capella & Orbital.

The headcount and geographical breakdown as of 13 August 2014 is as follows:

Scotland, by constituency

Staff (all numbers Full Time Equivalent)

UK

Cowglen (Glasgow South) current

Capella (Glasgow Central) near future

Orbital (East Kilbride, Strathaven & Lesmahagow) near future

NS&I

165

8

8

0

Atos

1074 permanent

471 permanent

340 permanent

131 permanent

430

agency

188

agency

168

agency

21

agency

24

contractors (SOPRA)

25th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what measures her Department has put in place to track foreign national offenders upon release back into the community since May 2010.

Tough enforcement is the cornerstone of this Government’s immigration policy.
Those who break our laws should be removed from the country at the earliest
opportunity, and we will seek to remove any foreign national who
receives a custodial sentence for a criminal offence.

We removed almost 5,100 foreign national offenders in 2013/14 and over 23,000
since 2010. We are removing more offenders straight from prison, which saved
the taxpayer £27.5million in the last financial year. This is all despite a 28%
increase in appeals.

We are dealing with offenders who do not want to go home, and in some cases
whose home country does not want to take them back. This presents challenges
which we are determined to overcome. Chief among the challenges are the legal
barriers we face.

That is why this Government is the first to have a strategy for dealing with
foreign national offenders, including overcoming obstacles to their removal. We have
also introduced new powers in the Immigration Act (2014) which have cut the number
of grounds on which criminals can appeal deportation. More than 500 foreign offenders
have already been removed under the new ‘deport now, appeal later’ provisions.

The majority of foreign national offenders in the community were released by an
Immigration Judge, despite our strong opposition. Most offenders are subject to
reporting conditions and, where possible, electronic tagging. If a foreign
national offender fails to comply with these conditions by absconding, our
dedicated national absconder tracing team works with the police, other
government agencies and commercial companies to track down, arrest
and return absconders to custody. The Home Office is using intelligence
and working more closely with partners to maximise the impact of enforcement
activity.

24th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what comparative assessment her Department has made of the costs of managing foreign national offenders in (a) Scotland and (b) the UK.

The Home Office has not made a comparative assessment of the costs of managing foreign national offenders in (a) Scotland and (b) the UK.

24th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department has taken to develop and standardise its approach to Foreign National Offenders casework since May 2010.

Last year, this Government removed 5,097 foreign national offenders, and wehave removed over 22,000 FNOs since 2010.

The Government introduced the Immigration Act (2014) which allows us to serve quick decisions, earlier in the process. It places the emphasis on the foreign criminal giving us information at the outset. This is a fundamental change in the process and we have already removed over 500 foreign national offenders underthe 'deport now, appeal later' provisions of the Act.

The Act also introduced new powers to prevent criminals using family life arguments to delay their deportation.

We have also introduced Operation Nexus which is a joint initative between Immigration Enforcement and police forces. Nexus identifies offenders that are foreign nationals at the point of arrest and allows Immigration Enforcement to consider those criminals for administrative removal or deportation. This has contributed to the removal of over 3,200 individuals so far.

24th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of the preventative and early intervention measures trialled in the foreign national offenders action plan.

This government is the first to have a strategy to remove foreign national
offenders.

Last year, this Government removed 5,097 foreign national offenders, and we
have removed over 22,000 FNOs since 2010. We have already removed over
500 foreign national offenders under the 'deport now, appeal later' provisions of the
Immigration Act which came into effect in July 2014. This is alongside FNOs
already being removed during their early removal scheme period. In 2013/14 we
removed more than 1,800 such FNOs.

Additionally we have introduced Operation Nexus, a joint endeavour between the
police and Immigration Enforcement officers, leading to the removal of over
3,200 individuals, joined the Schengen Information System (SIS II), extended
the use of checks of overseas criminal information and are working with the
Ministry of Justice to implement compulsory prisoner transfer agreements within
the EU.

18th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much compensation her Department has paid for unlawfully detaining people under immigration powers in Scotland in each of the last five years.

Detention is used as a last resort when we consider that there is a risk of harm to the public, or of detainees absconding before they can be removed. We have a robust process for reviewing detention decisions to ensure that they are
justified and necessary; occasionally, the courts will disagree with a particular decision and award compensation, but this happens in less than 1% of all detention cases.

The amounts paid by the Home Office in compensation following claims for unlawful detention in Scotland were as follows:

Financial Year No. of Claimants Amount Paid
2011-12 3 £39,300
2013-14 2 £13,500

It is not possible to provide similar information for earlier periods, as data are not held in the appropriate format and to extract them would incur disproportionate cost.

25th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions he has had with the Home Secretary and the Foreign Secretary on the development of the foreign national offenders action plan.

Ministers from all three Departments meet regularly to discuss priority countries for FNO removals and the implementation of the cross-departmental action plan.

Andrew Selous
Second Church Estates Commissioner