Information between 10th March 2026 - 20th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 26th March 2026 Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Short debate - Grand Committee Subject: The use of reasonable adjustments by, and the safety of, people living with learning disabilities when accessing health and social care View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 48 Noes - 142 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 29 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 31 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 28 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 46 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 30 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 27 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 46 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Scriven voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Circumcision
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to protect boys from non-therapeutic male circumcisions performed by doctors who have been struck off the medical register. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |
|
Circumcision
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what safeguarding assessment they have made of doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions continuing to circumcise boys as laypeople. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |
|
Mohamed Abdisamad
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what external groups, if any, they have consulted with regarding the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of future deaths report, published on 28 December 2025. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |
|
Circumcision: Judaism
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what safeguarding assessment they have made of the rite of metzitzah b’peh. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |
|
Circumcision: Religious Practice
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken in response to the recommendation in the Children’s Rights Alliance for England and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report You feel like you’re nothing, published in 2006, that the Government work with religious communities to defer ritual circumcision until informed consent can be obtained from the individual. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |
|
Zuber Bux
Asked by: Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the case of Zuber Bux, a doctor who has been struck off the register and continues to circumcise boys as a layperson. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is in the process of providing a response to the Mohamed Abdisamad: Prevention of Future Deaths report. The Department will respond by the extended deadline and meet with external groups if necessary. No assessment has been made regarding doctors who have been struck off the medical register for dangerous circumcisions, nor the case of Zuber Bux. No safeguarding assessment has been made regarding the rite of metzitzah b’peh. The Children’s Rights Alliance and National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children report, You feel like you’re nothing, was published in 2006 under a previous administration and there are no current plans to implement the recommendation highlighted regarding working with religious communities to defer ritual male circumcision so that the informed consent of the child can be sought. The Government would encourage anyone seeking non-therapeutic male circumcision (NMTC) services for themselves, or for someone else, to use the services of a regulated healthcare professional. If an NMTC procedure is carried out by a regulated healthcare professional, they are subject to regulatory oversight by the relevant regulators such as the General Medical Council or the Nursing and Midwifery Council. Even if a healthcare professional is acting in a religious or spiritual role, they cannot ‘opt out’ of their core duties and responsibilities and therefore any registered healthcare professional wishing to carry out NTMC must be registered with the Care Quality Commission to carry out the regulated activity of surgical procedures. |