Lord Field of Birkenhead Portrait

Lord Field of Birkenhead

Crossbench - Birkenhead

Became Member: 11th September 2020

Left House: 23rd April 2024 (Death)


Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
26th Jan 2021 - 23rd Apr 2024
Liaison Committee (Commons)
6th Nov 2017 - 6th Nov 2019
Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
31st Oct 2017 - 6th Nov 2019
Liaison Committee Sub-committee on the effectiveness and influence of the select committee system
13th Feb 2019 - 6th Nov 2019
Work and Pensions Committee
12th Jul 2017 - 6th Nov 2019
Liaison Committee (Commons)
10th Sep 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
28th Oct 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Work and Pensions Committee
18th Jun 2015 - 3rd May 2017
Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
26th Oct 2010 - 30th Mar 2015
Draft Modern Slavery Bill (Joint Committee)
9th Jan 2014 - 3rd Apr 2014
Draft Modern Slavery Bill
9th Jan 2014 - 3rd Apr 2014
Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
6th Jul 2005 - 8th Apr 2010
Public Accounts Committee
15th May 2002 - 12th Jul 2005
Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)
31st Jan 2002 - 5th May 2005
Minister (Department of Social Security) (Welfare Reform)
3rd May 1997 - 28th Jul 1998
Social Security
18th Nov 1993 - 21st Mar 1997
Social Security
27th Apr 1992 - 21st Mar 1997
Liaison Committee (Commons)
17th Jun 1987 - 21st Mar 1997
Shadow Spokesperson (Education)
1st Jun 1980 - 1st Jun 1981


Division Voting information

Lord Field of Birkenhead has voted in 1866 divisions, and 141 times against the majority of their Party.

17 Jul 2018 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour No votes vs 237 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 307
17 Jul 2018 - Trade Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 235 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 286
16 Jul 2018 - Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 239 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 302
16 Jul 2018 - Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 239 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 300
16 Jul 2018 - Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 235 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 285
20 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour No votes vs 243 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 319
13 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 74 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 126
13 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 242 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 298
13 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 240 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 296
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (Programme) (No. 3) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 246 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 304
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 246 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 302
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 248 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 304
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 244 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 301
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 247 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 302
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour Aye votes vs 243 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 297
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 241 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 298
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 245 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 301
12 Jun 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 248 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 306
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 243 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 322
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 246 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 320
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 245 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 320
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 48 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 322
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 246 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 321
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 242 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 322
17 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 240 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 295
16 Jan 2018 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 244 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 321
20 Dec 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 61 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 114 Noes - 320
20 Dec 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 243 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 294
13 Dec 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour No votes vs 244 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 305
21 Nov 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour No votes vs 240 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 315
14 Nov 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 19 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 68
11 Sep 2017 - European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 237 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 290
13 Mar 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour Aye votes vs 209 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 287
13 Mar 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour Aye votes vs 212 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 331 Noes - 286
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 213 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 336
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 213 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 336
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 212 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 338
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 213 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 337
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 19 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 33 Noes - 340
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 214 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 327
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 211 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 332
8 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 211 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 336
8 Feb 2017 - Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 68 Labour No votes vs 85 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 409 Noes - 126
7 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 209 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 326
7 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 19 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 336
7 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 207 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 337
7 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 333
1 Feb 2017 - European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Labour No votes vs 33 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 336
2 Dec 2015 - ISIL in Syria - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 56 Labour No votes vs 139 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 390
2 Dec 2015 - ISIL in Syria - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 65 Labour Aye votes vs 153 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 397 Noes - 223
13 Oct 2015 - Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 204 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 274
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 178 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 292
28 Apr 2014 - High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Labour Aye votes vs 185 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 50 Noes - 451
28 Apr 2014 - High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 186 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 452 Noes - 41
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour Aye votes vs 201 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 340
20 May 2013 - Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour Aye votes vs 190 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 375
15 May 2013 - Economic Growth - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 219 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 277
10 Jul 2012 - House of Lords Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Labour No votes vs 201 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 462 Noes - 124
30 Apr 2012 - Sunday Trading (London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games) Bill [Lords] (Allocation of Time) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 102 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 112
12 Mar 2012 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 36 Labour No votes vs 50 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 82
7 Mar 2012 - Historical Enquiries Team - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 177 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 183
1 Feb 2012 - Green Investment Bank - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 199 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 212
24 Oct 2011 - National Referendum on the European Union - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 214 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 483
19 Oct 2011 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 71 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 95
11 Jul 2011 - European Union Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour No votes vs 198 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 485 Noes - 22
28 Jun 2011 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 187 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 23 Noes - 473
3 May 2011 - Finance (No. 3) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 21 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 27 Noes - 253
27 Apr 2011 - Press Self-regulation - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 20
1 Apr 2011 - Broadcasting (Public Service Content) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 11 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 16
30 Mar 2011 - Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 33 Labour Aye votes vs 170 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 37 Noes - 480
9 Feb 2011 - Domestic Heating Oil - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 193 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 223
2 Nov 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour Aye votes vs 217 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 31 Noes - 549
12 Oct 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 231 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 326
24 Feb 2010 - Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 26 Labour Aye votes vs 243 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 252
3 Feb 2010 - Yemen - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Labour No votes vs 212 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 403 Noes - 20
19 Jan 2010 - Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 258 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 303
9 Dec 2009 - Child Poverty Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 274 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 289
12 Nov 2009 - Coroners and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour Aye votes vs 236 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 243
9 Nov 2009 - Coroners and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 31 Labour Aye votes vs 265 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 274
9 Nov 2009 - Coroners and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 281 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 342 Noes - 145
21 Oct 2009 - Equitable Life - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour Aye votes vs 287 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 294
12 Oct 2009 - Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 270 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 288
21 Jul 2009 - Parliamentary Standards Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 240 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 0 Noes - 0
8 Jul 2009 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Labour Aye votes vs 269 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 283
1 Jul 2009 - Parliamentary Standards Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 271 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 284
24 Jun 2009 - Iraq Inquiry - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 288 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 299
17 Jun 2009 - Business Rate Supplements Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 249 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 227
19 May 2009 - Policing and Crime Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour Aye votes vs 272 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 285
30 Apr 2009 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Labour Aye votes vs 216 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 285
1 Apr 2009 - Rating and Valuation (S.I., 2009, No. 204) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 235 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 289
24 Mar 2009 - Coroners and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 263 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 328
2 Mar 2009 - Political Parties and Elections Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 93 Labour No votes vs 155 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 176
28 Jan 2009 - Heathrow (Third Runway) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 281 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 297
17 Dec 2008 - Value Added Tax - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 283 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 303
8 Dec 2008 - Speaker’s Committee on the Search of Offices on the Parliamentary Estate - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 30 Labour Aye votes vs 274 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 285
8 Dec 2008 - Speaker’s Committee on the Search of Offices on the Parliamentary Estate - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour No votes vs 282 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 270
12 Nov 2008 - European Scrutiny (Standing Orders) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour Aye votes vs 194 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 201
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 48 Labour Aye votes vs 230 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 299
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 49 Labour Aye votes vs 227 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 206 Noes - 298
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 47 Labour Aye votes vs 226 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 306
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 16 Labour No votes vs 261 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 355 Noes - 129
17 Jul 2008 - Reform of Intelligence and Security Committee - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Labour Aye votes vs 198 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 32 Noes - 205
16 Jul 2008 - Members’ Allowances - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 284 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 295
3 Jul 2008 - Members’ Salaries - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 82 Labour Aye votes vs 136 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 196
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 47 Labour Aye votes vs 226 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 292
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 48 Labour Aye votes vs 227 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 290
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 39 Labour Aye votes vs 240 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 190 Noes - 332
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 42 Labour Aye votes vs 229 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 309
20 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 56 Labour Aye votes vs 231 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 304
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 61 Labour Aye votes vs 215 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 336
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 62 Labour Aye votes vs 216 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 286
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 58 Labour Aye votes vs 217 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 314
19 May 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 51 Labour Aye votes vs 225 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 342
31 Mar 2008 - Housing and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 27 Labour Aye votes vs 252 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 263
31 Mar 2008 - Housing and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 248 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 259
19 Mar 2008 - Post Office Closures - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Labour Aye votes vs 279 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 288
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 28 Labour Aye votes vs 299 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 311
5 Mar 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 24 Labour Aye votes vs 299 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 311
27 Feb 2008 - Treaty of Lisbon (No. 8) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 275 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 345
26 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 277 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 285
20 Feb 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Labour Aye votes vs 272 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 331
30 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Labour Aye votes vs 286 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 351
28 Jan 2008 - Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 295 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 303
28 Jan 2008 - Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 291 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 243
21 Jan 2008 - European Union (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 298 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 224
17 Jul 2007 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Labour Aye votes vs 297 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 305
17 Jul 2007 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 294 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 253
25 Jun 2007 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Labour Aye votes vs 259 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 269
5 Jun 2007 - Termination of Pregnancy (Counselling and Miscellaneous Provisions) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Labour Aye votes vs 132 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 182
18 May 2007 - Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 14 Labour Aye votes vs 77 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 33 Noes - 100
18 May 2007 - Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Labour No votes vs 90 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 22
18 May 2007 - Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Labour No votes vs 77 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 25
18 Apr 2007 - Pensions Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 273 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 282
28 Mar 2007 - deferred divisions - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Labour No votes vs 265 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 250
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 111 Labour Aye votes vs 197 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 375
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 96 Labour No votes vs 207 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 224
7 Mar 2007 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 302 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 329
1 Nov 2006 - Legislative Process - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour No votes vs 261 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 199
31 Oct 2006 - Termination of Pregnancy - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Labour Aye votes vs 129 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 187
24 Oct 2006 - Police and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 15 Labour No votes vs 304 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 272
17 Oct 2006 - Gambling Act 2005 (Amendment) - View Vote Context
Lord Field of Birkenhead voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 46 Labour No votes vs 49 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 240
View All Lord Field of Birkenhead Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
John Bercow (Speaker)
(51 debate interactions)
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
(34 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for Work and Pensions
(201 debate contributions)
Home Office
(96 debate contributions)
Department for Education
(70 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(70 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Field of Birkenhead's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Field of Birkenhead, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


14 Bills introduced by Lord Field of Birkenhead


A Bill to make provision for local authorities to monitor the educational, physical and emotional development of children receiving elective home education, and for connected purposes

Lords Completed
Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 24th July 2018

A Bill to require local authorities to facilitate the delivery of programmes that provide free meals and activities for children during school holidays; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 40%

Last Event - 2nd Reading: House Of Commons
Friday 19th January 2018
(Read Debate)

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to amend the definitions of worker and self-employed person; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Monday 10th June 2019

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to safeguard rights of European Union citizens in the United Kingdom after exit day; to make provision for arrangements to be made with other European Economic Area countries and Switzerland to maintain the rights of British citizens in those countries after exit day; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Monday 29th April 2019

A Bill to require the Secretary of State to guarantee paid employment for six months for claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance, or the jobseeker’s component of Universal Credit, who have been unemployed for six months or longer; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 13th June 2018
(Read Debate)

A Bill to require school governing bodies to implement affordability policies when setting school uniform requirements; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Monday 5th November 2018

A Bill to require landlords to meet standards for the hygienic storage and preparation of food and the provision of cooking appliances and equipment in accommodation provided for tenants in receipt of Universal Credit or Housing Benefit; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 5th February 2019

A Bill to abolish the House of Lords and make provision for its replacement by a Senate.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 19th June 2018

A Bill to require landlords of tenants in receipt of Universal Credit or Housing Benefit to ensure that their rented accommodation meets minimum standards for the hygienic storage and preparation of food; contains adequate appliances, equipment and utensils for the cooking of food; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Thursday 20th October 2016
(Read Debate)

A Bill to provide local authorities with the duties and powers required to identify and automatically register all children eligible for free school meals; to provide for an opt-out where the family wishes; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 15th December 2015

A Bill to require the creation of a register of owners of property in the Greater London area, including details of the name of the owner of each property and the name of the beneficiary owner in the case of properties owned by a trust or similar body; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 20th April 2016
(Read Debate)

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to amend the Equality Act 2010 to remove discrimination against women in relation to consecration of bishops in the Church of England; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Thursday 22nd November 2012

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to make provision for filling vacancies among Lords Spiritual sitting and voting as Lords of Parliament.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 12th December 2012

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to require the Secretary of State to make provision for the system for social housing allocation to give priority of choice of social housing to those with an exemplary tenancy record; to place a duty on housing associations to inform potential tenants about conduct of existing tenants in neighbouring properties; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Tuesday 24th January 2012

Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
50 Other Department Questions
9th Mar 2023
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to secure Joshua Reynold's portrait of Omai for the nation.

We are in regular contact with the National Portrait Gallery and fully support their efforts to purchase this exceptional painting. In view of the strong support we have seen so far, the Government has extended the export deferral period to 10 June 2023 to provide every opportunity to save the Portrait of Omai so that the widest possible audience can see, enjoy, and learn from it for generations to come.

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay
Shadow Minister (Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)
10th Jul 2019
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, pursuant to the Answer of 12 March 2019 to Question 227049 on George Bell, whether the £29,800 represents the full payment for all costs incurred by the church in its initial judgement on Bishop George Bell; and what proportion of that sum was used for costs for (a) lawyers and (b) damages.

The former First Church Estates Commissioner gave the answer to the General Synod in July 2016, this can be found on page 58 of the Reports and Proceedings of the General Synod: https://www.churchofengland.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/July%202016%20Report%20of%20Proceedings%20w.index_.pdf.
As the former First Church Estates Commissioner confirmed in his replies on that occasion, it is not the usual practice of the Church Commissioners to report on legal expenditure.

19th Jun 2019
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, whether Members' staff can (a) register with and (b) access an on-site medical doctor.

Members’ staff cannot register with nor access an on-site medical doctor as there are none on-site. There are occupational health physicians who work within the Parliamentary Health and Wellbeing Service (PHWS) via a contract with Guys and St Thomas’ hospital. Managers can refer their staff to PHWS for advice and support if they feel that their health is being affected by their work. Members of Parliament can seek occupational health advice for their staff via the Members HR advisory service.

10th Jun 2019
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, pursuant to the Answer of 5 June 2019 to Question 259013, how many affordable homes have been built by the Church of England or its agents in each local authority area since 2015; and what the affordable housing requirement is in each of those local authority areas.

There have been 295 new affordable homes created on land owned by the Church Commissioners since 2015.

Details for each Local Authority area are shown in the following table.

Local Authority

Number of Affordable Houses Provided

Policy Requirement for Number of Affordable Houses

Durham

34

50

West Lindsey

15

30

East Cambridgeshire

30

60

Carlisle

42

42

Mendip

60

60

Sunderland

23

23

Arun

15

15

Ashford

77

77

Total

295

356

3rd Jun 2019
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, what proportion of residential developments constructed since 2015 (a) on land owned by the Church of England under the direction of the strategic land team and (b) by private developers comprise affordable housing.

Planning permissions have been granted across a range of geographies, from County Durham where the affordable housing requirement is currently 15%, to Wells in Somerset where the requirement is 40%.

On land owned by the Church Commissioners where planning permission has been received and sites sold since 2015, approximately 20% of the homes will be affordable dwellings.

10th Jan 2019
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, what recent assessment the Commission has made of the efficiency of call-handling procedures in the House of Commons Pass Office.

The Pass Office recently introduced a Netcall telephone management system in order to monitor calls. In general, this shows that the Pass Office is receiving an increased volume of calls. This reflects a 17% increase in the number of pass applications, from 10,849 in 2017 to 12,940 in 2018. In particular, the Pass Office experienced a large increase in calls following the Christmas break. This coincided with a period when the Pass Office was suffering from staff shortages. While this is now being addressed, it has meant that the office currently has fewer people dedicated to responding to calls, as the back-office team also perform duties such as processing security clearance applications.

The Pass Office is keen to ensure good customer service. As calls to the Pass Office are often to check on the status of applications, callers are being advised to email the Pass Office with the relevant information. This is so that Pass Office staff can then respond more effectively and swiftly to these enquiries. The Pass Office encourages e-mail enquiries as the best way customers can get a quick update on the status of an application.

8th Oct 2018
To ask the Honourable Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, which housing estates (a) in the Greater London area and (b) elsewhere have been sold by the Church Commissioners; and whether guarantees were sought that those estates would remain in social housing ownership.

In 2005 and 2006 following careful consideration the Church Commissioners took the decision to sell what were known as the Octavia Hill Estates, comprising approximately 1,580 flats and houses within the Greater London area.

The sales, to a joint venture between Grainger plc and Genesis Housing Group, were subject to the residents’ leases, and the rights and obligations contained in these remained. A commitment was made to engage with residents’ associations and to keep in touch with tenants as the sales progressed to keep them fully informed. Some tenants had the right to purchase their properties and this was communicated to the qualifying tenants.

In 1985 the Church Commissioners took the decision to sell their residential property holdings in Brixton to a housing association. According to the records of the Commissioners covenants were not placed on these properties and to the best of knowledge these properties are still owned by a housing association.

The Church Commissioners are not and have never been a social housing provider and have a statutory duty to deliver the best possible return on their investments to fund the work and mission of the Church of England across the country. The Church Commissioners continue to provide new housing across the country where they have land holdings and affordable housing is a key part of that provision.

8th Oct 2018
To ask the Honourable Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, which AGMs the Commissioners have attended in relation to companies in which shares are held by the Commissioners in each of the last three years.

In 2016 the Church Commissioners established an engagement team in conjunction with the Church of England Pensions Board, reflecting the importance of engagement in the application of our ethical investment policies. The engagement team has responsibility for voting our shareholdings in publicly listed companies, preparing ethical exclusion lists, and engaging companies in which we are shareholders on issues related to our ethical policies. During 2017 they undertook 112 engagements on behalf of the Church Commissioners, which ranged from letter-based contact to regular meetings with Chairs or Board members. The most significant proportion of face-to-face meetings remained with companies in the extractive industries. A list of company AGMs attended by the Church Commissioners’ Engagement Team in 2016, 2017 and 2018 (to date) is below.

2016

ANGLO AMERICAN PLC

BHP BILLITON PLC

BP PLC, LONDON

Centrica plc Exxon

GLENCORE PLC

OCADO GROUP

RIO TINTO PLC

TULLOW OIL

2017

ANGLO AMERICAN PLC

Antofagasta plc

BP PLC

Exxon

Glencore plc

RIO TINTO PLC

2018

ANGLO AMERICAN PLC

BP PLC

Centrica plc

EXXON

Glencore plc

Millennium & Copthorne Hotels plc

RIO TINTO PLC

Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc

Royal Dutch Shell

WPP plc.

19th Feb 2018
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, pursuant to the Answer of 1 February 2018 to Question 122128, if he will provide an assurance that no further reductions will be made to the opening hours of the Post Office in Central Lobby.

In the last Parliament, committees in both Houses agreed a Memorandum of Understanding between Parliament and Post Office Counters Ltd (POCL) to formalise the arrangement under which POCL provide counter services to Parliament. Due to the importance of counter services on the parliamentary estate to Members of both Houses, this agreement provides assurance that the service would not be withdrawn or changed without consultation with and notice to Members.

11th Jan 2018
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, (a) how many and (b) which hon. Members were consulted about the change in the opening hours of the post office in Members' Lobby.

In response to a Post Office Counters Ltd (POCL) request under its Memorandum of Understanding with both Houses of Parliament, the House of Commons Administration Committee agreed a change to the opening hours of the Post Office counter located in Members Lobby. This change altered the closing time of the counter on Sitting Days from 2200 to 1900.

Because of the timing of the 2017 General Election and the delay in setting up Domestic Committees, the Administration Committee was notified of the change some considerable time after POCL gave notice that it would need to reduce the opening hours for staffing reasons.

The decision was made at the Committee’s meeting on 11 December 2017, and implemented from 8 January 2018. Whilst there was no House-wide consultation with hon. Members, the Committee based its decision around data on usage of the counter facility, ensuring value for money whilst avoiding unnecessary duplication of services.

10th Jan 2018
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, if the Church Commissioners will extend the period for consultation on the proposed demolition of St Elisabeth's Church, Eastbourne, while continuing with their plans to develop that site.

The consultation period concerning the draft Pastoral (Church Buildings Disposal) Scheme for the demolition of St Elisabeth’s Church at Eastbourne ran from the 17th November until the 8th of January. The publication of the consultation followed a period of extensive liaison by the Church Commissioners with various interested parties in the future of the closed church. The building has been closed for regular public worship since 2002.

With regard to the future of the murals by Hans Feibusch, the draft Scheme provides for further time (until 1 September 2018) for potential recipients of the murals to produce a viable proposal for their relocation. This period had already been extended and the Church Commissioners remain open to discussions with any interested party in resolving their future.

10th Oct 2017
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what the Government Equalities Office's estimate is of the amount of EU legislation and regulation that can be incorporated into UK law without amendment.

The Government Equalities Office (GEO) has overall responsibility for the Civil Partnership Act 2004, the Equality Act 2006, the Equality Act 2010 and the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) 2013.

The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill will convert European Union law into UK law as it applies in the UK at the moment of exit. This will ensure that, wherever possible, the same rules and laws will apply the day after exit as they did before.

The Government is still making a detailed assessment of what corrections will be required to make that law function appropriately on exit day. The Department for Exiting the European Union are working closely with departments across Government, including GEO, to ensure we make the changes required to deliver a functioning statute book on exit in the most efficient manner possible.

12th Jul 2017
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many employees experienced a reduction in working hours during the 2017 Dissolution period; and what the (a) smallest, (b) average and (c) largest total reduction in earnings was by proportion of those people who did experience a reduction in working hours.

No members of staff experienced a reduction in their contractual working hours as a result of Dissolution or a decrease in their contractual earnings.

Staff employed in areas where there was a reduction in work as a result of Dissolution would have had limited opportunity to work non-contractual additional hours or overtime, unless they were helping out areas that were busier because of the Dissolution, such as Digital Services or the New Members Reception Area. Staff continue to receive their contractual monthly salary during periods of lower operational demand. Some staff will have taken annual leave or used up banked hours of Time off in Lieu (TOIL).

Fluctuations in working hours are managed locally; mainly through flexitime or rostering arrangements. This information is not held centrally.

8th Feb 2017
To ask the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington, representing the House of Commons Commission, how many contract staff the House employs on zero-hours contracts; and what information it holds on the number of such staff employed by the House of Lords.

The House of Commons Commission does not hold this information about staff employed by its contractors. The House is committed to offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all its directly employed staff. The House of Commons Commission does not hold such information relating to contractors used by the House of Lords.

21st Oct 2016
To ask the Rt. hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington representing the House of Commons Commission, on how many days under the current Travel Office contract the ticket machines situated in the House have been unable to print hon. Members' travel tickets.

The Trainline ticket machine situated in the Parliamentary Travel Office has been unable to print tickets on six separate days since September 2014, the latest period being 17–19 October 2016. The machine is owned by Trainline but it is CTM’s responsibility to ensure that they report any faults so that they can be fixed quickly and efficiently.

The ticket machine situated in the Members’ Centre in Portcullis House is maintained by IPSA and therefore the Commission does not hold records on the operation of that machine. However, officials are aware that the machine has been out of service since the beginning of September 2016.

8th Jun 2016
To ask the Rt. hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington representing the House of Commons Commission, what the budget was for the out-of-hours taxi service for armed police officers working in the House in each of the last five years; and on how many occasions that service was used in each of those years.

Prior to 1 April 2016 the House paid for all Metropolitan Police Staff (MPS) required by business to stay until 11pm or later. This included police officers, armed police and civilian security officers. Data is not held according to job role and, therefore, it is not possible to provide the data in the format requested.

Following a change that the MPS put in place to the police officer rosters as well as the new police contract which came into effect on 1 April 2016, police officers, including armed officers, no longer use late night transport paid for by the two Houses.

8th Apr 2016
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the enforcement of age discrimination legislation in respect of people seeking employment.

Age is a protected characteristic in the Equality Act 2010. Where differential treatment because of age cannot be objectively justified, this will constitute unlawful age discrimination both in employment and in the provision of goods and services. Enforcement of the Act’s employment provisions is undertaken by Employment Tribunals, to which a person must make a claim if they feel that they have been discriminated against because of age.

Prior to an Employment Tribunal claim, conciliation services are provided by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Services (Acas). According to the Employment tribunal statistics, 1,087 age discrimination claims were made to Employment Tribunals in 2014/15. 70% (761) of these claims were either withdrawn or successfully conciliated by Acas without the need for a full hearing. The Acas process is intended to enable employers and employees to resolve disputes without the need for a full Employment Tribunal hearing.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s enforcement powers under the Equality Act 2006 apply to age discrimination as they do to other protected characteristics.

24th Feb 2016
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, whether the settlement the Church Commissioners made to the complainant against George Bell was made directly in relation to allegations against Bell, or on the basis that a complaint made under a subsequent Bishop, was not handled in a way which would be expected today.

A formal claim for compensation was submitted in April 2014 and was settled in the autumn of 2015. The settlement followed a thorough pre-litigation process during which investigations took place.

Following the settlement of the claim the Bishop of Chichester, the Rt Revd Martin Warner issued a formal apology. The statement can be read on the Church of England’s website at the following address: https://www.churchofengland.org/media-centre/news/2015/10/statement-on-the-rt-revd-george-bell-%281883-1958%29.aspx

The statement from Bishop Warner went on to say that “the response from the Diocese of Chichester in 1995, when the survivor first came forward, fell a long way short, not just of what is expected now, but of what we now appreciate you should have had a right to expect then."

24th Feb 2016
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, whether any of the Estates Commissioners saw the charge sheet on which George Bell was found guilty of child abuse on the balance of probabilities.

The language of “guilt” and “charge sheets” refers to criminal cases. The claim against Bishop Bell was a civil claim. The civil courts do not use charge sheets and as a result there has not been a charge sheet for the Estates Commissioners to see then or now.

24th Feb 2016
To ask the right hon. Member for Meriden, representing the Church Commissioners, how many people involved in investigating allegations of child abuse made against George Bell consulted his papers and diaries in Lambeth Palace Library in the last three years.

In 2013 and 2015 three staff members viewed various sections of the bishop's personal papers held at Lambeth Palace Library on two separate occasions.

4th Jan 2016
To ask the Prime Minister, what steps the Government has taken to meet the conditions set out in the motion passed by the House on 2 December 2015 on ISIL in Syria.

I refer the right hon. Member to the oral statement made by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, my right hon. Friend the Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond) on 16 December 2015, Official Report, column 1566.

17th Dec 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what discussions she has had with energy suppliers on the effect of pre-payment meter tariffs on low-income households' energy costs.

My Right Hon member, DECC Ministers and officials meet with energy companies on a regular basis to discuss a range of issues.

The Government shares the CMA’s concerns that there is a lack of competitive tariffs for pre-payment customers, despite the recent increase in competition from independent suppliers.

The Government is committed to ensuring that the market works effectively for all consumers, including through implementing the final recommendations of the CMA following their investigation.

In the meantime, we will continue our focus on keeping bills down through promoting competition, making switching quicker and easier and providing direct help to the most vulnerable.

9th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of a policy of requiring cash retentions from the construction industry to be placed in a trust in the event of insolvency.

The Government acknowledges that some people are unhappy with the system of retentions as it stands, but it is an embedded feature of the construction industry. Therefore, our general approach is to work with the industry through the Construction Leadership Council and its supply chain payment charter; endorsing its commitment to zero retentions by 2025.


That will involve quite far-reaching changes to the way the sector works. With regard to shorter-term measure to require retentions to be held in trust, we must act on the basis of evidence. That is why the Government is commissioning an analysis of the cost and benefit of retention payments to inform future action.

9th Oct 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, how many households will not be reimbursed for the funds they paid for a Green Deal Assessment; and what (a) total and (b) average sum is paid by such households.

598,612 Green Deal Assessments had been lodged by the end of August 2015.


This has played a part in the installation of around 1.6 million energy efficiency measures in around 1.3 million properties.


The Department’s Green Deal Customer Journey Survey, published in March 2015, showed that 80% of householders did not pay to have a Green Deal Assessment, and that of those people who did pay in full or in part for their assessment, half paid £150 or less.1,2 Consumers have obtained Green Deal assessments for a number of reasons, these include: saving money on their energy bills; the prospect of a warmer home; the offer of free assessments; having improvements done for free or at a reduced price; and concerns over rising energy bills. Assessments have allowed householders to access a number of different Government schemes or fund work themselves. The Government does not offer reimbursements for assessments which are payments to companies or private individuals.


[1] Page 10 of report at

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414170/green_deal_customer_journey_survey_report.pdf

2 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414176/green_deal_customer_journey_topline_data.xlsx (Table D7)

9th Oct 2015
To ask the Rt. hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington representing the House of Commons Commission, how many fire alarms in Portcullis House in the last 12 months (a) resulted from fires and (b) were false alarms.

Since October 2014 there has been one fire alarm in Portcullis House caused by a fire. There have been six false alarms: two of which were manual call point actuations and four caused by equipment defects or the inadvertent interruption of detector beams.

17th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the adult skills budget on the long-term financial stability of the further education sector.

The financial health of further education colleges is under constant review by the Skills Funding Agency based on self-assessment information from colleges and the publication of college accounts. Colleges with inadequate financial health are subject to intervention led by the FE Commissioner.

Across all our grant, loan and capital support for adult FE, we are making available over £3bn in 2015-16 and our funding mechanism is designed to allow providers the freedoms and flexibilities to decide how best to use their allocation to respond to local learner and employer demand. As autonomous organisations it is up to colleges to manage their own budgets.

Apprenticeships are our priority for skills and colleges have been encouraged to expand their apprenticeship offer. As government funding has reduced, many colleges have responded well by looking at generating other income streams and creating sustainable business models for the future. This entrepreneurial approach will help ensure sustainable future business models with less reliance on government funding.

In order to address the significant financial pressures on institutions, a declining 16-19 population and the need to maintain very tight fiscal discipline in order to tackle the deficit, a major reform of post-16 education and training institutions is necessary. On 20 July the Departments for Education and Business, Innovation and Skills announced a programme of area-based reviews to review 16+ provision in every area. These reviews will provide an opportunity for institutions and localities to restructure their provision to ensure it is tailored to the changing context and designed to achieve maximum impact.

16th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many and what proportion of further education colleges reported a financial deficit in 2014-15.

Further education colleges report on an academic year basis. The 2014/15 academic year ends in August 2015 so the information requested will not be available until January 2016.

In 2013/14 110 out of 244 colleges, representing 45% of colleges, reported an operating deficit.

10th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of whether the legal basis of the Low Pay Commission will need to be changed in order to set and implement the National Living Wage; and if he will make a statement.

The Low Pay Commission (LPC) continues to play a critical role in providing recommendations for the National Minimum Wage rates, and now has new responsibilities to help deliver the Governments’ ambition for the National Living Wage (NLW).

The Government will continue to set the remit for the LPC on the existing legal base.

7th Jul 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what estimate she has made of the average change in household energy bills which occurred as a result of measures announced in the 2013 Autumn Statement.

In November 2014 DECC published estimates of the impact of energy and climate change policies on energy prices and bills[1]. The report included an estimate of the impact of the package of measures for household energy bills announced at the 2013 Autumn Statement.

The report set out that the total reduction in individual household energy bills will depend on the energy supplier but estimated that, on average, this package was worth around £50 (including VAT) per household in 2014, broken down as follows:

· A Government Electricity Rebate of £12 on household electricity bills in 2014/15 and 2015/16 delivered by energy suppliers.

· A reduction in the cost of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO). While costs will vary across companies, the major energy suppliers announced that the changes will result in an average £30-£35 off bills in 2014.

· Voluntary action by electricity distribution network operators (DNOs) to reduce network costs in 2014/15, leading to a further one-off deferral of around £5 on electricity bills on average.

[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/estimated-impacts-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-energy-prices-and-bills-2014

26th Jun 2015
To ask the hon. Member for Mole Valley representing the House of Commons Commission, whether all contractors supplying a service to the House have now been signed up as living wage employers.

We can confirm that all contractors and their sub-contractors providing services to the House have agreed to pay the living wage or London living wage to those of their staff working on contracts for the House. Payment of the living wage or London living wage is included within our Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract.

22nd Jun 2015
To ask the Prime Minister, if he will request from the Chairman of the Chilcot Inquiry a list of the witnesses from whom the inquiry is still waiting for comments on the draft material sent to them; and if he will also request the date in each case when material for approval was last sent.

The conduct of the "Maxwellisation" process is a matter for the independent Chilcot Inquiry.

19th Jun 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many (a) direct employees, (b) agency staff and (c) outsourced staff working for his Department and its subsidiary agencies are paid less than the living wage.

There are no direct employees or agency staff in the core Department paid less than the living wage.

We do not centrally hold details of the pay levels of staff working for outsourced companies contracted by the core Department.

I have asked Chief Executives of the executive agencies to respond directly to the right Hon. Member.

19th Jun 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, how many (a) direct employees, (b) agency staff and (c) outsourced staff working for her Department and its subsidiary agencies are paid less than the living wage.

The Department has no staff who are paid less than the London or National Living Wage.

DECC has received assurances from its key suppliers that they have no workers currently in post earning less than the London or National Living Wage guidelines.

DECC is also signed into a larger Shared Services contract through the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) to provide Facilities Management (FM) and Catering services. There are 21 staff working for the FM contractor & 6 working for the catering contractor who receive less than the London Living Wage and are based primarily in DECC buildings. DECC is also signed into a larger Shared Services contract through the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) to provide Facilities Management (FM) and Catering services. There are 21 staff working for the FM contractor & 6 working for the catering contractor who receive less than the London Living Wage and are based primarily in DECC buildings.

18th Jun 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, if she will bring forward proposals for a regulated social tariff for all energy suppliers to ensure all low income customers automatically receive the cheapest tariff.

The Competition and Markets Authority are currently undertaking a review of competition in the energy market and are due to publish Provisional Findings and Possible Remedies (if required) shortly. The CMA has the necessary expertise to determine what problems exist in the energy market and identify appropriate solutions. This Government has committed to implement all relevant recommendations of the CMA.

16th Jun 2015
To ask the hon. Member for Mole Valley representing the House of Commons Commission, how many apprenticeships are available on the parliamentary estate.

The House Service runs an apprenticeship scheme that offers 10 placements each year. The scheme was launched in 2013. Apprentices complete a 12-month placement, studying to NVQ levels 2 or 3. The first cohort of 10 apprentices studied and completed an NVQ in Business Administration, and all 10 secured jobs at the end of their apprenticeship with the House Service. The second cohort started in September 2014, with one studying for a Professional Cookery level 3 qualification. The House of Commons does not hold definitive information about the number of apprentices working for contractors on the estate. However, there are at least 13 apprentices currently working on the estate who are employed by contractors.
2nd Jun 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, if he will begin an investigation into the liability of ScottishPower and the alleged mis-selling of cashback warranties.

Information was received in July 2014 from the liquidators of two companies involved in administering the cashback warranty scheme formerly sold by Scottish Power. This information has been reviewed by the Insolvency Service to determine whether or not any further investigation is warranted using powers available in the Companies Act.

The liquidation of the companies involved in the scheme is still under way, and the creditors of those companies will receive reports from the liquidators if they are to be paid further dividends.

Investigations conducted under section 447 Companies Act 1985 are confidential; therefore it is not our practice to announce whether or not such an investigation is taking place, or to report on the investigation outside of strict statutory gateways.

12th Mar 2015
To ask the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross representing the House of Commons Commission, pursuant to the Answer of 2 March 2015 to Question 225489, if the Commission will make it its policy to collect information from contractors operating on the parliamentary estate on how many of their workers are employed on a zero-hours contract.

As I indicated in my answer, the House does not routinely collect this information from contractors operating on the parliamentary estate and has no plans to do so. The House is committed to offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all directly-employed staff on call-off (zero hours) contracts and has completed a process of offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all affected staff.

25th Feb 2015
To ask the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross representing the House of Commons Commission, if he will seek information from contractors operating on the parliamentary estate on how many of their workers are employed on a zero-hours contract.

The House does not routinely collect this information from contractors operating on the parliamentary estate and has no plans to do so. The House is committed to offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all directly-employed staff on call-off (zero hours) contracts and has completed a process of offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all affected staff.

24th Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, how many and what proportion of households in (a) England and (b) the UK used (i) pre-payment, (ii) direct debit and (iii) standard credit methods for paying for energy in each year since 2010; and what proportion of each such group of customers was categorised as fuel poor.

Data on methods of payment for domestic energy consumers are published in Quarterly Energy Prices, tables 2.4.2 and 2.5.2.

This is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/quarterly-domestic-energy-price-stastics.

19th Jan 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps he has taken to ensure that the views of local residents are represented in decisions relating to drilling for shale gas.

Companies developing shale will speak with local communities, residents and other stakeholders at each of the three stages of operations – exploration, appraisal and production. This is as well as consultation through the planning application.

The planning process takes into account local considerations, there are multiple opportunities for the public to be consulted and permission can attach conditions for operators.

Communities that host shale development should share in the benefits. A community benefits package means that £100,000 is paid to local communities on exploration and a minimum of 1% of revenues from production.

29th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, if he will take steps to ensure that no child living in poverty grows up in a cold home.

Our new fuel poverty target will focus on improving the energy efficiency of all fuel poor households, including children in poor households. We will be starting with the most inefficient and coldest homes first.

We have a strong package of policies already delivering assistance and making steps to help those in need. Under our current plans from April 2018, domestic and non-domestic privately rented property will need to meet a minimum standard, which we have proposed to be an E EPC rating.

Meanwhile, we continue to provide help to the most vulnerable by supporting over 2 million households a year with the Warm Home Discount as well as providing Winter Fuel Payments of up to £300.

We also have in place the Big Energy Saving Network which is providing outreach to consumers, helping them understand tariffs and switching options as well as how they could benefit from energy efficiency programmes available to them.

Our Energy Company Obligation (ECO) funds efficient boilers and insulation measures to low income and vulnerable households is now guaranteed until at least 2017. This has contributed to Government’s target of improving the energy efficiency of 1million homes from January 2013 to March 2015.

We have already made significant progress towards achieving this with around 797,000 homes improved through a combination of ECO, Green Deal Cashback, Green Deal finance and the Green Deal Home Improvement Fund to the end of August 2014.

26th Sep 2014
Pay
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, how many (a) direct employees, (b) outsourced workers and (c) workers in agencies which report to his Department are paid less than the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation.

I can confirm that from April 2014 there were no Civil Servants or contractors employed on DECC premises who were paid less the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation in either London or Scotland.

DECC has no executive agencies.

3rd Sep 2014
Pay
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many (a) direct employees, (b) outsourced workers and (c) agency workers in executive agencies which report to his Department are paid less than the Living Wage as defined by the Living Wage Foundation.

I have approached the Chief Executives of the Department’s Executive Agencies (Insolvency Service, Companies House, National Measurement Office, Intellectual Property Office, UK Space Agency, Ordnance Survey, Met Office, Land Registry and the Skills Funding Agency) and they will respond to the Rt Hon. Member directly.

We fully support those that choose to pay above the NMW when it is affordable to do so and not at the expense of jobs. In terms of affordability in the public sector, there are important considerations about the impact on public service delivery, which is why it’s important that decisions on pay are made by individual departments.

On the basis of fairness and affordability the Secretary of State instructed the department to give the lowest paid contracted staff (including cleaners) an above inflation pay rise. From 1 April, the lowest paid contracted staff at BIS offices across the UK will be paid £7.85 per hour, up £1.40 or nearly 22% from the previous £6.45 per hour rate. This increase has restored and surpassed the real value of wages that had fallen in recent years. This also means that BIS contractors will be amongst the top 25% (upper quartile) of contractors across Whitehall and will benefit 252 employees across 81 sites in the UK.

3rd Sep 2014
Pay
To ask the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross representing the House of Commons Commission, how many (a) direct, (b) outsourced and (c) agency employees on the Parliamentary estate are (i) paid less than the London living wage and (ii) employed on a zero-hours contract.

The House of Commons is an accredited London Living Wage Employer. In order to obtain our licence the House had to satisfy the Living Wage Foundation that no directly employed or contracted workers engaged to work on the Parliamentary estate are paid less than the London Living Wage (LLW). The House of Commons has gone further than its obligations under this licence by adopting a policy of assuring that all contractors supplying a service to the House, regardless of whether they work on the Estate, are paid at least a living wage.

The House is committed to offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all directly-employed staff on call-off (zero hours) contracts and has recently completed a process of offering guaranteed minimum hours contracts to all affected staff. The only call-off contracts that remain relate to two employees who have yet to accept or who preferred not to accept our offer.

We do not have information on whether or how many contracted workers are employed on zero hours contracts.

9th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what recent assessment his Department has made of the effect of climate change on global sea levels.

The most recent assessment of the effect of climate change on global sea level rise comes from the Working Group I contribution to the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report, which states that over the period 1901 to 2010 global mean sea level rose by 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] metres, that since the mid-19th century the rate of sea level rise has been larger than the mean rate over the previous two millennia and that it is very likely that there has been a substantial contribution to the global mean sea level rise since the 1970s from the effects of human activity.

8th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, if he will take steps to prevent sister companies offering similar products to consumers at substantially different prices.

The Government believes that the consumer is best served by the operation of open competition between companies, and does not generally intervene to regulate what businesses may or may not charge consumers for goods or services. Pricing policies such as these are commercial decisions for the trader, and are best left to the market. However, if there's evidence of collusion that is harming consumers, this should be provided to the Competition and Markets Authority, as the UK's independent competition authority, who will consider it for investigation in line with their prioritisation principles.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Written Statement of 7 April 2014, Official Report, column 1WS, on higher education (student support), what estimate he has made of how many prospective students will no longer be eligible for the disabled students' allowance once the changes set out in the statement are introduced; and what steps he plans to take to support those prospective students.

Disabled students will continue to receive support through a combination of disabled students' allowances (DSAs) and reasonable adjustments made by Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Each student's needs are unique. Some will receive more support through reasonable adjustments than previously experienced. Written guidance will be available.

It is not possible to make an accurate estimate of how many prospective students will no longer be eligible for DSAs as many students receive more than one type of support.

Current DSA recipients and disabled students applying for DSAs in 2014/15 will not be affected by these changes in 2015/16.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, if he will introduce legislative proposals to provide that the heirs of people who disclaim hereditary peerages cannot claim any hereditary right to membership of the House of Lords; and if he will publish details of how many people entitled to hereditary peerages have renounced their titles where their oldest eligible son has subsequently claimed the title on their death.

The Government's proposals introduced to the House of Commons on 10 July 2012 included plans to end hereditary peerages altogether.The Government has no further specific plans to legislate in this area. Currently anyone in this position has every right to disclaim the title should they so wish.

Eighteen people have disclaimed their titles since the passage of the 1963 Peerage Act, the first being the late Tony Benn. Of those disclaimed peerages, seven have subsequently been claimed by the entitled heir.

To ask the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross representing the House of Commons Commission, how many fire alarms have sounded in Portcullis House in the last 12 months; on how many of these occasions the London Fire Brigade arrived to attend a fire; and on how many of these occasions the London Fire Brigade discovered a fire.

There have been three fire alarms resulting in evacuations from Portcullis House in the last 12 months. One of these alarms, on 24th March 2014, led to the attendance of the London Fire Brigade. On this occasion the alarm was triggered by a heat detector following the overheating of a grill in the Lower Ground Kitchens as well as the triggering of a manual call point. No fire was discovered.