Debates between Jerome Mayhew and Paul Holmes during the 2024 Parliament

Wed 27th Nov 2024

Finance Bill

Debate between Jerome Mayhew and Paul Holmes
2nd reading
Wednesday 27th November 2024

(3 weeks, 6 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Finance Bill 2024-26 View all Finance Bill 2024-26 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jerome Mayhew Portrait Jerome Mayhew
- Hansard - -

In a moment. If we add that all up, there would be £50 billion that could be spent on the frontline. However, the problem with the Labour party is that it takes money and spends it on inflation-busting wage rises for its union paymasters, but not on increasing and improving the outcomes for the people who use services. That is the big difference between the Conservative party and the Labour party. The focus of our spending is not the people providing the services; we are for the people who use those services—the people of this country.

Paul Holmes Portrait Paul Holmes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is making a typically eloquent and excellent speech. I challenged a number of Labour Members to outline that public services can be invested in if, in addition to some of the tax-raising mechanisms they have chosen, we have economic growth. Will my hon. Friend outline how much growth has been cut by under the Government’s proposals compared with ours? Am I correct in thinking it is 0.7% over the Parliament?

Jerome Mayhew Portrait Jerome Mayhew
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is entirely correct: over the course of the forecast period, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that growth will be cut by 0.7%. It is worse than that, however, because we also have an increase in taxes on businesses of £25 billion through the national insurance contributions, which the OBR tells us will be paid for overwhelmingly by reduced pay for workers, amounting to £7.5 billion. It also forecasts that more than 50,000 full time-equivalent jobs will be lost as a result of the policies that Labour Members plan to vote for.

--- Later in debate ---
Jerome Mayhew Portrait Jerome Mayhew
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman’s intervention was not on the point that he rose for, but there is one thing that he does not mention, and that is the covid impact. [Interruption.] Hon. Members can laugh about it, but we spent £400 billion supporting the economy and the people of this country in a once-in-a-century impact on our economy.

Paul Holmes Portrait Paul Holmes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If my hon. Friend will forgive me, will he give way?

Jerome Mayhew Portrait Jerome Mayhew
- Hansard - -

Yes, I will. That was extraordinary.

Paul Holmes Portrait Paul Holmes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does he agree with me that there seems to be a collective amnesia among colleagues on the Labour Benches? If we had taken their advice during covid, when we were making reasonable decisions, not only would we have seen the longer lockdowns that the now Prime Minister was calling for, but more economic damage, which they now deny ever happened in the first place.

Jerome Mayhew Portrait Jerome Mayhew
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right, and there is a point worth making here. Since covid, the private sector has improved productivity by about 6%. Productivity in the public sector has yet to improve, although before the general election it was starting to do that.