Information between 8th May 2025 - 18th May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 95 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 402 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315 |
|
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 102 |
|
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 402 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 98 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 98 |
|
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative Aye votes vs 15 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 279 |
|
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Jerome Mayhew voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative No votes vs 15 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 239 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jerome Mayhew contributed 2 speeches (256 words) Thursday 15th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Jerome Mayhew speeches from: Petitions
Jerome Mayhew contributed 1 speech (331 words) Wednesday 14th May 2025 - Commons Chamber |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Domicil
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Wednesday 14th May 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent estimate her Department has made of the potential impact of ending the non-domiciled tax status on revenues to the Exchequer. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)
A supplementary forecast information release around the costings of reforms to the non-domicile regime was published by the Office for Budget Responsibility in January 2025. This costing outlines the certified impact of ending the non-domiciled tax status on revenues to the Exchequer. https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Non-doms-supplementary-release-Jan-2025.pdf |
||||||||||||||
|
Domicil
Asked by: Jerome Mayhew (Conservative - Broadland and Fakenham) Thursday 15th May 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of ending the non-domiciled tax status on the financial sector. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government’s priority is improving the UK’s competitiveness internationally and securing economic growth. The non-domicile reforms have been specifically designed to make the UK competitive with a modern, simple tax regime that is also fair. The reforms establish a tax regime for new residents, which is more attractive to new arrivals than the current rules.
As part of the reforms, the Government also wants to incentivise non-domiciled individuals who are not eligible for the new regime to spend and invest their foreign income and gains in the UK. That is why existing and previous users of the remittance basis will be able to take advantage of a three-year Temporary Repatriation Facility (TRF) to bring their offshore funds to the UK at a discounted tax rate.
The Government has also reformed Overseas Workday Relief to ensure the UK remains competitive with other countries that offer similar schemes for talented internationally mobile employees. The Government wants to continue to encourage highly skilled workers to work in the UK and contribute their skills to the workforce, including in the financial services sector. The Government published a Tax Information and Impact Note for this policy at Autumn Budget 2024. This can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tax-changes-for-non-uk-domiciled-individuals/reforming-the-taxation-of-non-uk-domiciled-individuals.
|
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 8th May 2025
Attendance statistics - Members attendance 2024-25 (Northern Ireland Affairs) Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: Labour, North Northumberland) (added 28 Oct 2024) 13 of 15 (86.7%) Former members Attendance Jerome Mayhew |