Baroness Uddin Portrait

Baroness Uddin

Non-affiliated - Life peer

Joined House of Lords: 18th July 1998


8 APPG Officer Positions (as of 29 Jun 2026)
Commonwealth, Cyber Security and Business Resilience, Data and Emerging Technologies, Digital Identity, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Yemen
6 APPG Memberships
Autism, Future of Work, Global Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, International Students, Internet, Communications and Technology, Modern Conflict
64 Former APPG Officer Positions
Adult Social Care, Adult Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse, Africa, Assistive Technology, Australia and New Zealand, Autism, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, British Curry Catering Industry, Business Responses to Social Crises, Canada, Central Bank and Digital Currency, Children’s Parliament, China, Côte d’Ivoire, Crypto and Digital Assets, Curry Catering Industry, Cyber Security, Disability, Domestic Violence and Abuse, Ethics and Sustainability in Fashion, Faith and Society, Food Banks, Foreign Affairs, Future Generations, Future of Work, Hajj and Umrah, Inclusive Entrepreneurship, Indian Traditional Sciences, Indonesia, International Relations, International Students, Islamic Finance, Jordan, Libya, Malaysia, Management, Metaverse and Web 3.0, Mongolia, Morocco, Muslim Women, Nigeria, Oman, Population, Development and Reproductive Health, Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative, Qatar, Race Equality in Education, Religion in the Media, Sexual Violence in Conflict, Social Work, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sustainable Development Goals, Syria, Terrorism, Textiles and Fashion, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Nations Global Goals for Sustainable Development, Uzbekistan, Women and Work, Women in the Penal System, Zoroastrian
European Union Committee
3rd Dec 1998 - 11th Nov 1999


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Baroness Uddin has voted in 133 divisions, and 82 times against the majority of their Party.

4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125
20 Nov 2024 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 136
8 Jan 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 228
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 162
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 159
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 168
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 183
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 176
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 137
1 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 196
3 Jul 2025 - Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 16 Noes - 144
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 12 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 12 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 14 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 13 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 13 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Non-affiliated No votes vs 2 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162
28 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 183
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 150
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Non-affiliated No votes vs 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 12 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 11 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 7 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234
View All Baroness Uddin Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
(8 debate interactions)
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
(6 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department of Health and Social Care
(4 debate contributions)
Department for Work and Pensions
(4 debate contributions)
Home Office
(4 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Baroness Uddin's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Baroness Uddin, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Baroness Uddin has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Baroness Uddin has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 29 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
29th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what criteria they apply when deciding whether to convene a COBR meeting following violent attacks against communities; and what consideration they have given to convening a COBR meeting to discuss recent attacks on British Muslims.

The Cabinet Office maintains the framework for how the UK central government collectively responds to crises that require co-ordination across government, it is called the Amber Book. The UK’s emergency management system is founded on the principle of subsidiarity, where decisions are taken at the lowest possible level and co‑ordination at the highest necessary. Most emergencies in the UK are handled at a local level by local responders without the need to activate the government central crisis management arrangements, Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms (COBR). There is no set criteria for when COBR will be activated. The Government considers a range of guiding thresholds that are detailed in the Amber Book, with a key consideration being whether urgent collective decision‑making from ministers is required.
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Captain of the King's Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard (HM Household) (Deputy Chief Whip, House of Lords)
20th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what safeguards will be put in place to protect the right to refuse a digital ID.

We want people to have the option to use the digital ID to make their lives easier. There will be no legal obligation for people to have or present the national digital ID. If someone does not want a digital ID they will not have to get it.

Legislation on the digital ID will be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny in the usual way. Any changes to the scope of this legislation after it passes would need further parliamentary scrutiny.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
20th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to take steps to make the individuals who signed the House of Commons petition "Do not introduce Digital ID cards" aware of their ability to contribute to the consultation on digital ID.

The digital ID consultation, running from 10 March to 5 May, is open to all members of the public, including those who expressed interest via the House of Commons petition. We have launched a comprehensive communications campaign to ensure broad awareness. Members of the public can contribute via the GOV.UK survey, email or post.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
20th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the consultation on digital ID, whether they will make printed information about the consultation available in the premises of public services, including education, local authority and health service premises.

The Government has launched a national conversation to ensure the digital ID system is shaped by all communities.

The digital ID consultation will involve 8 weeks of open engagement – running from 10 March to 5 May - where anyone who wants to take part can share their views in ways that work for them. You can do this online via an online form, by email or by post.

We will also support local conversations and events across the UK to spread awareness and encourage participation. This includes roadshows, roundtables, as well as resources such as a ‘workshop in a box’ to help communities run their own discussions in ways that work for them. To request materials for ‘workshop in a box’, please email [email protected].

After the 8-week open engagement period, we will bring together a broadly representative group of 100-120 people from across the UK to take part in a more in-depth deliberative engagement process.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
20th Mar 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the consultation on digital ID, what steps they will take to ensure that the consultation mechanism and information are made available to all communities, including both inner city and rural areas.

The Government has launched a national conversation to ensure the digital ID system is shaped by all communities.

The digital ID consultation will involve 8 weeks of open engagement – running from 10 March to 5 May - where anyone who wants to take part can share their views in ways that work for them. You can do this online via an online form, by email or by post.

We will also support local conversations and events across the UK to spread awareness and encourage participation. This includes roadshows, roundtables, as well as resources such as a ‘workshop in a box’ to help communities run their own discussions in ways that work for them. To request materials for ‘workshop in a box’, please email [email protected].

After the 8-week open engagement period, we will bring together a broadly representative group of 100-120 people from across the UK to take part in a more in-depth deliberative engagement process.

Lord Collins of Highbury
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
29th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to increase the number of women entering the construction industry.

The £625 million Construction Skills Package investment is expected to deliver up to 60,000 additional skilled construction workers, supporting a sustainable talent pipeline across the sector. This includes increased teaching provision, improved teaching quality through ten Construction Technical Excellence Colleges (C‑TECs), teacher industry exchange programmes, and expanded on-site experience for learners. A new Foundation apprenticeship will provide a clear entry route into the sector, alongside existing apprenticeships, and supported by close collaboration with industry and targeted incentives for employers.

As part of the Construction Skills Package, we are using targeted communications campaigns to raise awareness of opportunities in construction and highlight the sector’s role in creating pathways to good jobs and progression. This includes tailored promotion of construction skills opportunities for individuals, including women, and those returning to the workforce, working closely with partners across government such as DWP and local job centres.

The Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) supports a range of initiatives designed to encourage more women into construction careers, including Onsite Experience hubs, SkillBuild, Go Construct and Women into Home Building. These programmes help raise awareness of opportunities in the sector, support entry into training and employment, and widen the pipeline of talent available to employers.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
21st Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the contribution of non-EU allies to European defence and security; and what discussions they have had with NATO and EU counterparts on ensuring that the capabilities, expertise and strategic contributions of non-EU NATO allies including the UK, Türkiye, Norway and Canada are incorporated within the Alliance’s efforts to reinforce Euro-Atlantic security.

I recognise the significant contribution that non-EU NATO Allies make to European defence and security, including the United Kingdom, Türkiye, Norway and Canada. As NATO Allies, we share responsibility for collective defence and Euro-Atlantic security, providing substantial military capabilities, operational expertise and leadership that underpin the Alliance's deterrence and defence posture. The UK works closely with other non-EU NATO Allies to strengthen NATO's collective capability and readiness, including through major bilateral partnerships such as the UK-Norway Lunna House Agreement, which deepens defence cooperation and is supporting the delivery of a joint Type 26 frigate programme.

The UK engages regularly with NATO and EU partners to promote cooperation that complements NATO and enables non-EU NATO Allies to contribute fully to fundamental Euro-Atlantic security.

Lord Wood of Anfield
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
2nd Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are taking any measures to sanction Israel in response to reports of violations of the latest ceasefire agreement in Gaza which prevent humanitarian aid from reaching families.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the answer provided on 29 April in response to Question HL14316.

1st Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what representation, if any, has been made to the government of Israel regarding reports of the continued forced displacement of Palestinians by settlers in the occupied territories; and what sanctions, if any, they plan to impose in response.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the responses I gave when this issue was raised in the House on 6 July by Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, Official Report, vol. 858, cols. 5-8.

1st Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made on any violation by Israel of the Fourth Geneva Convention over illegal settlements on occupied territory in the West Bank.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the responses I gave when this issue was raised in the House on 6 July by Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, Official Report, vol. 858, cols. 5-8.

1st Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what representation, if any, they have made to the Government of Israel on furthering a two state solution, in light of their approval of the E1 settlement construction plan.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the responses I gave when this issue was raised in the House on 6 July by Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, Official Report, vol. 858, cols. 5-8.

29th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of British citizens who have joined the Israel Defence Forces in their occupation of Gaza and conflict in Lebanon.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the answer provided in the House of Commons on 24 October 2024 in response to Question 9184, which - for ease of reference - is reproduced below:

"We are aware of reports of UK citizens travelling to fight for the Israel Defense Force (IDF), but the Government does not estimate the numbers of those who have done so. The UK recognises the right of British nationals with more than one nationality to serve in the legitimately recognised armed forces of their additional nationalities."

29th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to identify which British citizens have purchased settlement houses on the West Bank.

I refer the Noble Baroness to the responses I gave when this issue was raised in the House on 6 July by Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, Official Report, vol. 858, cols. 5-8.

16th Apr 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the need to prevent children from suffering from malnutrition or serious and life-threatening injuries in the course of Israel's bombing of Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon.

The UK is deeply concerned about the humanitarian impact of ongoing hostilities on civilians, particularly children in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. Last financial year, the UK provided £81 million of humanitarian and early recovery support to Palestine, including £9.7 million for UNICEF to support the provision of ready-to-use infant formula, water, sanitation and hygiene services, psychosocial services for children, and social protection for children. We continue to call on the Government of Israel to fully enable the UN and other humanitarian organisations to deliver essential humanitarian aid. The UK has also provided £30 million of vital humanitarian funding to Lebanon to support those most in need during the current crisis.

16th Apr 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they will take to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza and Lebanon.

The UK is deeply concerned about the humanitarian impact of ongoing hostilities on civilians, particularly children in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. Last financial year, the UK provided £81 million of humanitarian and early recovery support to Palestine, including £9.7 million for UNICEF to support the provision of ready-to-use infant formula, water, sanitation and hygiene services, psychosocial services for children, and social protection for children. We continue to call on the Government of Israel to fully enable the UN and other humanitarian organisations to deliver essential humanitarian aid. The UK has also provided £30 million of vital humanitarian funding to Lebanon to support those most in need during the current crisis.

16th Apr 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps, if any, they will take to ensure that UK and International charities are able to provide (1) women in Gaza and Lebanon with immediate access to sanitary products and medication, and (2) babies and infants in Gaza, West Bank and Lebanon with essential supplies such as water, milk, clothing, nappies.

The UK is deeply concerned about the humanitarian impact of ongoing hostilities on civilians, particularly children in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. Last financial year, the UK provided £81 million of humanitarian and early recovery support to Palestine, including £9.7 million for UNICEF to support the provision of ready-to-use infant formula, water, sanitation and hygiene services, psychosocial services for children, and social protection for children. We continue to call on the Government of Israel to fully enable the UN and other humanitarian organisations to deliver essential humanitarian aid. The UK has also provided £30 million of vital humanitarian funding to Lebanon to support those most in need during the current crisis.

4th Feb 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of online grooming in the case of Shamima Begum.

Shamima Begum had her British citizenship removed, as upheld by UK courts, which we support.

We do not comment on individual cases, operational intelligence or security matters and it would be inappropriate to comment on the specifics of Ms Begum’s case whilst legal proceedings are ongoing.

Depriving an individual of British citizenship keeps the very worst, high harm offenders out of the UK. Each case is assessed individually on the basis of all available evidence and always comes with a right of appeal..

The Government’s top priority remains maintaining our national security and keeping the public safe.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
4th Feb 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what measures are in place to ensure that young girls that are subject to online grooming in the UK are supported indiscriminately, regardless of their faith and race.

The Ministry of Justice is investing £550 million in victim support services over the next three years, including funding to Police and Crime Commissioner areas to commission victims support services locally, as well asfunding to over 60 specialist support organisations through the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Fund. These organisations provide support for victims and survivors of sexual abuse, including recent and non-recent victims of child sexual abuse, to cope and move forward with their lives. The Home Office’s Support for Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse Fund also supports seven voluntary and community sector organisations to have national reach and supports victims and survivors of child sexual abuse with a range of one-to-one and peer and survivor led support groups. These services support all victims and survivors irrespective of personal characteristics such as faith and race.

In 2025 as part of our response to recommendation 16 of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, the Government set out ambitious proposals to strengthen therapeutic support for victims, announcing it will provide up to £50 million in new funding to expand the Child House (Barnahus) model to every NHS region in England. This internationally recognised model—rightly viewed as the gold standard for supporting children who have experienced sexual abuse—will ensure that wherever a child lives, they can access the specialist, trauma-informed care they need to begin recovering and rebuilding their lives.

Children’s Independent Sexual Violence Advisor’s also provide practical and emotional support to children and young people aged 4 to 17 years, who have experienced rape, sexual abuse or sexual exploitation at any time during their life. They provide emotional and practical support and liaise between the police, courts and other agencies, acting as an advocate for the survivor.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
4th Feb 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent cases of online grooming by terrorists by educating people about the consequential danger to their wellbeing and the potential deprivation of their citizenship.

The Government takes the threat from online grooming by terrorist individuals and organisations seriously. Terrorist activity online and illegal radicalising content should have no place on the internet. However, the borderless nature of the internet means that the threat remains persistent.

The Home Office works to influence industry partners to increase action to tackle online content used to radicalise, recruit and incite terrorism by providing threat assessment, insight and support.

We also work with international to collaborate on tackling online radicalisation, and influence and align approaches where possible and respond to emerging threats.

Under the Online Safety Act, tech companies are accountable to Ofcom, the independent online safety regulator, to keep their users safe, and they need to have in place systems and processes to remove and limit the spread of illegal content, including terrorist material.

Through our Prevent programme, partners also deliver a range of activity from face-to-face workshops, online sessions, sessions at conferences, school assemblies etc around building resilience to extremist/terrorist narratives, online safety and the impact of terrorism.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
4th Feb 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of young girls who are currently in danger of online grooming; and what procedures are in place to support their wellbeing.

In the year ending September 2025 there were 7,527 recorded offences of sexual grooming (which includes sexual communication with a child). In the same period there were 1,000 defendants prosecuted and 1,085 convicted for sexual grooming offences. Girls are more likely to be affected by sexual offending than boys. However, the majority of CSA remains hidden and under-identified. The Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse (CSA Centre) estimate that 15% of girls experience some form of sexual abuse before age 16 compared to 5% of boys (year ending March 2020). The Home Office funds the CSA Centre to drive system-wide improvements in professionals’ ability to identify and respond to child sexual abuse

The Home Office also equips UK Law Enforcement with the capabilities required to identify and tackle more child sex offenders, including online grooming. The Home Office funds a network of Undercover Online (UCOL) officers based in Regional Organised Crime Units. This network uses specially trained teams and infrastructure to target those who seek to groom children for sexual purposes.

The Home Office also provides funding to voluntary sector organisations to support victims and survivors of CSA through the Support for Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse fund. In 2025 as part of our response to recommendation 16 of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, the Government set out ambitious proposals to strengthen therapeutic support for victims, announcing it will provide up to £50 million in new funding to expand the Child House (Barnahus) model to every NHS region in England. This internationally recognised model—rightly viewed as the gold standard for supporting children who have experienced sexual abuse—will ensure that wherever a child lives, they can access the specialist, trauma-informed care they need to begin recovering and rebuilding their lives.

The Online Safety Act is also deigned to drive down online grooming. This landmark piece of legislation protects citizens, especially children, from abuse and harm online, such as grooming. There are over 40 specific measures in Ofcom’s Codes of Practice, which will protect children from the risk of online grooming. The Government is committed to supporting Ofcom’s effective implementation of the Act.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
29th Jan 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the statement by the Secretary of State for the Home Office on 26 January (HC Deb col 610), what steps they will take to ensure that data and information collected as a result of the increased use of facial recognition (1) remains in British jurisdiction, (2) is managed by the government, and (3) is not transferred to any third party entities or nations.

Custody images used for retrospective facial recognition searches are stored on the Police National Database. The data is held at a secure location in the UK.

Police use of facial recognition is governed by data protection legislation, which require that any processing of biometric data is lawful, fair, proportionate and subject to appropriate safeguards.

Police forces act as the data controllers for facial recognition use and must manage data, including any international transfers, in line with data protection law and established policing standards.

On 4 December last year, we launched a public consultation on when and how biometrics, facial recognition and similar technologies should be used, and what safeguards and oversight are needed. Following analysis of the responses, we will publish a formal government response in due course.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
29th Jan 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to the statement by the Secretary of State for the Home Office on 26 January (HC Deb col 610), what steps they are taking to correct and define new large language models for facial recognition to ensure errors and potential racial bias are removed.

Facial recognition algorithms provided by or procured with Home Office funding for police use are required to be independently tested for accuracy and bias. Independent testing is important because it helps determine the setting in which an algorithm can safely and fairly be used.

Where potential bias or performance issues are identified, the Home Office works with policing partners to ensure their guidance, practices, and oversight processes minimise any risks arising from use of the technology.

On 4 December last year, we launched a public consultation on when and how biometrics, facial recognition and similar technologies should be used, and what safeguards and oversight are needed. Following analysis of the responses, we will publish a formal government response in due course.

Lord Hanson of Flint
Minister of State (Home Office)
29th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to review and manage the impact on British data sovereignty of data currently being held by Palantir.

The Government takes the protection and sovereignty of UK data seriously. Within the Ministry of Defence, all Defence data used and developed through Palantir software remains under the ownership and control of the Ministry of Defence. None of the UK Defence Data is held by Palantir. The data remains sovereign, is managed within UK-governed security frameworks, and is subject to contractual, technical and governance controls designed to protect it from unauthorised access or transfer. Any changes to arrangements governing Defence data require Ministry of Defence consent. Government departments keep supplier, security and data protection arrangements under regular review to ensure they remain appropriate and compliant with UK legal and security requirements.

Lord Coaker
Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)
25th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with British Muslim communities about the rise of attacks against (1) Muslim communities, and (2) Muslim women.

The Government regularly engages with representatives of British Muslim communities to understand their concerns, including around the rise in attacks against Muslim communities and Muslim women.

As part of this engagement, the Government also works closely with the British Muslim Trust, which we fund to monitor anti-Muslim hate and provide a helpline service to support victims. Data shared through this work helps improve our understanding of the nature and scale of anti-Muslim hatred and informs our policy response.

The Government remains committed to tackling anti-Muslim hatred in all its forms and ensuring that Muslim communities feel safe and supported. We will also appoint a special representative on anti-Muslim hostility, with further details on this role to be set out in due course.

Lord Lemos
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)
25th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether any ministers have visited places of worship where British Muslims have been attacked in the last 12 months.

Together with our cross-government work to tackle the root causes of all forms of hatred and strengthen cohesion through the suite of measures set out in our Protecting What Matters action plan, the Government is taking sustained action to keep Muslims safe, support victims, and challenge hatred.

This includes: adopting a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hostility that protects individuals while safeguarding freedom of speech; providing record funding of £40 million for the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme; launching a new Faith Security Training Scheme; committing up to £4 million to help tackle anti-Muslim hostility including funding the British Muslim Trust to provide a comprehensive service to monitor anti-Muslim hatred and support victims; and committing to appoint a Special Representative to champion efforts across the UK to tackle anti-Muslim hostility.

Ministers stand with Muslim communities against all forms of anti-Muslim hostility, and we will continue to work closely with Muslim communities and relevant organisations to ensure that our actions are effective, proportionate and grounded in lived experience – and that they, too, drive real change.

Ministerial engagement has included visits to mosques and Muslim community centres by the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary, Home Office and MHCLG Ministers. These visits include targeted places of worship:

  • Minister Jones visited Peacehaven Mosque on 6 October 2025.
  • The Prime Minister and Home Secretary visited Peacehaven Mosque on 23 October 2025.
  • Minister Fahnbulleh visited Peterborough Darassalaam Mosque on 15 Jan 2026.
  • Minister Caliskan and Lord Lemos visited the British Muslim Heritage Centre on 17 June 2026 as part of a wider visit. The centre had also been targeted with religiously motivated graffiti in December 2025.
  • Minister Caliskan also visited Lincoln Green Mosque in Leeds on 20 May 2026, following the attack on a mosque in San Diego, to listen to their views and to reassure Muslim communities in the UK of the Government’s commitment to tackling anti-Muslim hostility.

There are further ministerial visits to places of worship scheduled for the coming months, providing continued reassurance to communities across the country that the Government is taking action to tackle anti-Muslim hostility.

Lord Lemos
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)
25th Jun 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to protect British Muslims and their communities from violent attacks.

Together with our cross-government work to tackle the root causes of all forms of hatred and strengthen cohesion through the suite of measures set out in our Protecting What Matters action plan, the Government is taking sustained action to keep Muslims safe, support victims, and challenge hatred.

This includes: adopting a non-statutory definition of anti-Muslim hostility that protects individuals while safeguarding freedom of speech; providing record funding of £40 million for the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme; launching a new Faith Security Training Scheme; committing up to £4 million to help tackle anti-Muslim hostility including funding the British Muslim Trust to provide a comprehensive service to monitor anti-Muslim hatred and support victims; and committing to appoint a Special Representative to champion efforts across the UK to tackle anti-Muslim hostility.

Ministers stand with Muslim communities against all forms of anti-Muslim hostility, and we will continue to work closely with Muslim communities and relevant organisations to ensure that our actions are effective, proportionate and grounded in lived experience – and that they, too, drive real change.

Ministerial engagement has included visits to mosques and Muslim community centres by the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary, Home Office and MHCLG Ministers. These visits include targeted places of worship:

  • Minister Jones visited Peacehaven Mosque on 6 October 2025.
  • The Prime Minister and Home Secretary visited Peacehaven Mosque on 23 October 2025.
  • Minister Fahnbulleh visited Peterborough Darassalaam Mosque on 15 Jan 2026.
  • Minister Caliskan and Lord Lemos visited the British Muslim Heritage Centre on 17 June 2026 as part of a wider visit. The centre had also been targeted with religiously motivated graffiti in December 2025.
  • Minister Caliskan also visited Lincoln Green Mosque in Leeds on 20 May 2026, following the attack on a mosque in San Diego, to listen to their views and to reassure Muslim communities in the UK of the Government’s commitment to tackling anti-Muslim hostility.

There are further ministerial visits to places of worship scheduled for the coming months, providing continued reassurance to communities across the country that the Government is taking action to tackle anti-Muslim hostility.

Lord Lemos
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)