Information between 15th February 2026 - 17th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 7 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 4 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 5 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 7 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Uddin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Internet: Offences against Children
Asked by: Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of young girls who are currently in danger of online grooming; and what procedures are in place to support their wellbeing. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) In the year ending September 2025 there were 7,527 recorded offences of sexual grooming (which includes sexual communication with a child). In the same period there were 1,000 defendants prosecuted and 1,085 convicted for sexual grooming offences. Girls are more likely to be affected by sexual offending than boys. However, the majority of CSA remains hidden and under-identified. The Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse (CSA Centre) estimate that 15% of girls experience some form of sexual abuse before age 16 compared to 5% of boys (year ending March 2020). The Home Office funds the CSA Centre to drive system-wide improvements in professionals’ ability to identify and respond to child sexual abuse
The Home Office also equips UK Law Enforcement with the capabilities required to identify and tackle more child sex offenders, including online grooming. The Home Office funds a network of Undercover Online (UCOL) officers based in Regional Organised Crime Units. This network uses specially trained teams and infrastructure to target those who seek to groom children for sexual purposes.
The Home Office also provides funding to voluntary sector organisations to support victims and survivors of CSA through the Support for Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse fund. In 2025 as part of our response to recommendation 16 of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, the Government set out ambitious proposals to strengthen therapeutic support for victims, announcing it will provide up to £50 million in new funding to expand the Child House (Barnahus) model to every NHS region in England. This internationally recognised model—rightly viewed as the gold standard for supporting children who have experienced sexual abuse—will ensure that wherever a child lives, they can access the specialist, trauma-informed care they need to begin recovering and rebuilding their lives.
The Online Safety Act is also deigned to drive down online grooming. This landmark piece of legislation protects citizens, especially children, from abuse and harm online, such as grooming. There are over 40 specific measures in Ofcom’s Codes of Practice, which will protect children from the risk of online grooming. The Government is committed to supporting Ofcom’s effective implementation of the Act. |
|
Offences against Children: Internet
Asked by: Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent cases of online grooming by terrorists by educating people about the consequential danger to their wellbeing and the potential deprivation of their citizenship. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government takes the threat from online grooming by terrorist individuals and organisations seriously. Terrorist activity online and illegal radicalising content should have no place on the internet. However, the borderless nature of the internet means that the threat remains persistent. The Home Office works to influence industry partners to increase action to tackle online content used to radicalise, recruit and incite terrorism by providing threat assessment, insight and support. We also work with international to collaborate on tackling online radicalisation, and influence and align approaches where possible and respond to emerging threats. Under the Online Safety Act, tech companies are accountable to Ofcom, the independent online safety regulator, to keep their users safe, and they need to have in place systems and processes to remove and limit the spread of illegal content, including terrorist material. Through our Prevent programme, partners also deliver a range of activity from face-to-face workshops, online sessions, sessions at conferences, school assemblies etc around building resilience to extremist/terrorist narratives, online safety and the impact of terrorism. |
|
Offences against Children: Internet
Asked by: Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what measures are in place to ensure that young girls that are subject to online grooming in the UK are supported indiscriminately, regardless of their faith and race. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The Ministry of Justice is investing £550 million in victim support services over the next three years, including funding to Police and Crime Commissioner areas to commission victims support services locally, as well asfunding to over 60 specialist support organisations through the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Fund. These organisations provide support for victims and survivors of sexual abuse, including recent and non-recent victims of child sexual abuse, to cope and move forward with their lives. The Home Office’s Support for Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse Fund also supports seven voluntary and community sector organisations to have national reach and supports victims and survivors of child sexual abuse with a range of one-to-one and peer and survivor led support groups. These services support all victims and survivors irrespective of personal characteristics such as faith and race. In 2025 as part of our response to recommendation 16 of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, the Government set out ambitious proposals to strengthen therapeutic support for victims, announcing it will provide up to £50 million in new funding to expand the Child House (Barnahus) model to every NHS region in England. This internationally recognised model—rightly viewed as the gold standard for supporting children who have experienced sexual abuse—will ensure that wherever a child lives, they can access the specialist, trauma-informed care they need to begin recovering and rebuilding their lives. Children’s Independent Sexual Violence Advisor’s also provide practical and emotional support to children and young people aged 4 to 17 years, who have experienced rape, sexual abuse or sexual exploitation at any time during their life. They provide emotional and practical support and liaise between the police, courts and other agencies, acting as an advocate for the survivor. |
|
Shamima Begum
Asked by: Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of online grooming in the case of Shamima Begum. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Shamima Begum had her British citizenship removed, as upheld by UK courts, which we support. We do not comment on individual cases, operational intelligence or security matters and it would be inappropriate to comment on the specifics of Ms Begum’s case whilst legal proceedings are ongoing. Depriving an individual of British citizenship keeps the very worst, high harm offenders out of the UK. Each case is assessed individually on the basis of all available evidence and always comes with a right of appeal.. The Government’s top priority remains maintaining our national security and keeping the public safe. |