Debates between Baroness Lister of Burtersett and Lord Faulks during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Mon 26th Feb 2018
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Lords Chamber

Committee: 2nd sitting (Hansard - continued): House of Lords

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Baroness Lister of Burtersett and Lord Faulks
Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government’s position has been made quite clear: they have no intention of repealing the Human Rights Act. It is perfectly true that the previous Government said that they would consult on the question and bring in a British Bill of Rights, which would not mean departing from the European convention. Of course, I understand that there are those who are suspicious of this Government’s motives—I do not speak for the Government—but if a Government were hell-bent on getting rid of human rights, they would of course be able to get rid of the charter as well. I do not accept the sinister interpretation of the noble Baroness. The intention is simply to achieve clarity; that is what the Bill is about.

Baroness Lister of Burtersett Portrait Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Conservative manifesto said:

“We will not repeal … the Human Rights Act while the process of Brexit is underway but we will consider our human rights legal framework when the process of leaving the EU concludes. We will remain signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights for the duration of the next parliament”.


When the Minister replies, can he give us an assurance about the long-term commitment of the Conservative Party to the Human Rights Act?

Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No Parliament can bind its successor; one would expect every Government to consider human rights as an ongoing process, and how best to protect them.