Baroness Lister of Burtersett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Lister of Burtersett

Information between 19th September 2025 - 19th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Monday 27th October 2025
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Impact on child poverty of the application of the no recourse to public funds policy to migrant families with children and the implications for the forthcoming child poverty strategy
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 125 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 175
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 134
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 189
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Lister of Burtersett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 128 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194


Speeches
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 1 speech (209 words)
Committee stage part one
Monday 13th October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Baroness Lister of Burtersett speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Lister of Burtersett contributed 3 speeches (648 words)
Committee stage part two
Monday 13th October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Israel: Overseas Trade
Asked by: Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 16th October 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have considered reversing the burden of proof to require Israeli exporters to demonstrate their goods are not produced in illegal settlements before being imported into the UK.

Answered by Lord Stockwood - Minister of State (HM Treasury)

The UK Government has a clear position that Israeli settlements in Palestine are illegal under international law. The UK Government encourages accurate labelling of goods in order to avoid misleading consumers and promote transparency, including those goods produced in illegal settlements in Palestine. Goods produced in these settlements are not entitled to benefit from preferential tariff treatment under the UK’s current trade agreements with the Palestinian Authority and Israel. Where there are doubts about the declared origin of goods, HMRC undertakes checks to verify the origin and ensure fiscal compliance.

It is a long-standing position that preferential treatment will be refused to Israeli goods if the production conferring originating status has taken place in a location within Palestine brought under Israeli administration since June 1967. A 2004 technical arrangement, rolled over from the EU, requires that the city, village or industrial zone and postcode where production conferring originating status has taken place appear on all proofs of preferential origin issued or made out in Israel. A change in policy to this long-standing requirement is not currently under consideration.




Baroness Lister of Burtersett mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

13 Oct 2025, 9:56 p.m. - House of Lords
">> Not moved. Amendment 186. >> Baroness Lister of Burtersett Lords. >> I will introduce amendment 186 on behalf of the Right Reverend "
AMDT: 186 Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 10:19 p.m. - House of Lords
" I'm grateful to my Noble friend Baroness Lister of Burtersett for proposing the amendment and for the "
Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 11:29 p.m. - House of Lords
">> I. Not moved to oh three. >> J not moved. >> 203K Baroness Lister of Burtersett. "
Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript