Rosena Allin-Khan Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Rosena Allin-Khan

Information between 15th October 2026 - 25th October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context
Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108


Written Answers
Domestic Abuse: Victim Support Schemes
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting)
Tuesday 20th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps is he taking to support victims of domestic violence through the family courts process.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

We are committed to ensuring that victims of domestic abuse get the support they need throughout family court proceedings. The family court has a range of powers to protect victims. This includes the provision of special measures, the power to appoint an appropriately qualified person to undertake cross-examination instead of a perpetrator, and where repeated applications may be a continuing form of abuse the court can make order requiring a perpetrator to obtain the permission of the court before making a further application.

Alongside these existing protections we are rolling out the Child Focused Model nationally, which embeds referrals to local, specialist domestic abuse support services where domestic abuse is raised as an issue in the case. An Independent Domestic Violence Advisor delivers specialist support to victims, undertakes a risk assessment, and offers the court expert insights into the risks of domestic abuse in the case. This supports a holistic assessment of needs and risks and enables the court to make safe decisions without delay.

Domestic Abuse: Children
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting)
Tuesday 20th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to ensure family courts are empowered to prevent direct contact between a child and a domestic violence perpetrator.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to ensuring that the family justice system fully supports survivors of domestic abuse and delivers the right outcomes for them.

Section 1 of the Children Act 1989 (‘the Act’) makes clear that the child’s welfare must be the court’s paramount consideration when making any decision about their upbringing, including making decisions about contact.

The courts are already empowered to restrict or prevent contact through orders, for example a Child Arrangements Order, where this would be in the child’s best interest and protect their safety and wellbeing.

The Government is also going one step further by repealing the presumption of parental involvement from the Act through the Courts and Tribunals Bill. This step will ensure the child’s wellbeing and safety remains at the heart of the court’s decision-making: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4083

Family Courts: Judges
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting)
Tuesday 20th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps has he taken to ensure judges in family courts, dealing with cases involving allegations of rape and sexual abuse, have received specialist, mandatory and up-to-date trauma-informed training.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

To preserve judicial independence, statutory responsibility for the training of the courts’ judiciary in England and Wales rests with the Lady Chief Justice and is delivered through the Judicial College.

Domestic abuse in all its forms, including sexual abuse, is embedded as a central theme in training for family judges. Training is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure it continues to be effective and reflects the latest developments in law, practice and procedure.

The College adopts an overall trauma-informed approach which aims to equip judges to recognise and understand the effects of trauma, support safe and effective participation and avoid unnecessary re-traumatisation. All new judges complete a cross-jurisdiction induction which has a central focus on trauma-informed practice. The College is also developing a new foundation module to support enhanced understanding of the effects of trauma on presentation, behaviour and memory.




Rosena Allin-Khan mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting)
78 speeches (22,756 words)
Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting)
82 speeches (19,027 words)
Committee stage: 1st sitting
Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport