Information between 15th October 2026 - 25th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Domestic Abuse: Victim Support Schemes
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps is he taking to support victims of domestic violence through the family courts process. Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) We are committed to ensuring that victims of domestic abuse get the support they need throughout family court proceedings. The family court has a range of powers to protect victims. This includes the provision of special measures, the power to appoint an appropriately qualified person to undertake cross-examination instead of a perpetrator, and where repeated applications may be a continuing form of abuse the court can make order requiring a perpetrator to obtain the permission of the court before making a further application.
Alongside these existing protections we are rolling out the Child Focused Model nationally, which embeds referrals to local, specialist domestic abuse support services where domestic abuse is raised as an issue in the case. An Independent Domestic Violence Advisor delivers specialist support to victims, undertakes a risk assessment, and offers the court expert insights into the risks of domestic abuse in the case. This supports a holistic assessment of needs and risks and enables the court to make safe decisions without delay. |
|
Domestic Abuse: Children
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to ensure family courts are empowered to prevent direct contact between a child and a domestic violence perpetrator. Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) The Government is committed to ensuring that the family justice system fully supports survivors of domestic abuse and delivers the right outcomes for them. Section 1 of the Children Act 1989 (‘the Act’) makes clear that the child’s welfare must be the court’s paramount consideration when making any decision about their upbringing, including making decisions about contact. The courts are already empowered to restrict or prevent contact through orders, for example a Child Arrangements Order, where this would be in the child’s best interest and protect their safety and wellbeing. The Government is also going one step further by repealing the presumption of parental involvement from the Act through the Courts and Tribunals Bill. This step will ensure the child’s wellbeing and safety remains at the heart of the court’s decision-making: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4083 |
|
Family Courts: Judges
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps has he taken to ensure judges in family courts, dealing with cases involving allegations of rape and sexual abuse, have received specialist, mandatory and up-to-date trauma-informed training. Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) To preserve judicial independence, statutory responsibility for the training of the courts’ judiciary in England and Wales rests with the Lady Chief Justice and is delivered through the Judicial College.
Domestic abuse in all its forms, including sexual abuse, is embedded as a central theme in training for family judges. Training is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure it continues to be effective and reflects the latest developments in law, practice and procedure.
The College adopts an overall trauma-informed approach which aims to equip judges to recognise and understand the effects of trauma, support safe and effective participation and avoid unnecessary re-traumatisation. All new judges complete a cross-jurisdiction induction which has a central focus on trauma-informed practice. The College is also developing a new foundation module to support enhanced understanding of the effects of trauma on presentation, behaviour and memory. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Sporting Events Bill [HL] (First sitting)
78 speeches (22,756 words) Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Sporting Events Bill [HL] (Second sitting)
82 speeches (19,027 words) Committee stage: 1st sitting Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Public Bill Committees Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |