Information between 2nd July 2025 - 22nd July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 49 Labour No votes vs 333 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260 |
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 9 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26 |
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158 |
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 47 Labour Aye votes vs 331 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 47 Labour No votes vs 333 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 37 Labour No votes vs 330 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Rosena Allin-Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
Written Answers |
---|
Iran: British Nationals Abroad
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps he is taking to support British citizens in Iran. Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) Our Embassy in Tehran which continues to operate remotely, is closely monitoring the situation in Iran. We remain committed to ensuring the safety and security of our nationals, including those detained. However we have long advised against all travel to Iran and warned British Nationals that in an emergency the UK government will not be able to evacuate or provide face-to-face assistance. |
Google: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 7th July 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of Google's compliance with the AI safety commitments made at the Seoul AI Safety Summit in May 2024 in relation to its Gemini 2.5 Pro model. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) We expect all signatories to the Seoul commitments to stand by their agreements. The AI Security Institute, within DSIT, has ongoing discussions will all major developers, including Google DeepMind, about the implementation of frontier AI frameworks that guide the safe development of AI. The government welcomes Google's recently published framework that prioritises the emerging risk of deception in AI models and their plans to publish safety cases. |
Artificial Intelligence: Safety
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 7th July 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps he is taking to help ensure all signatory companies from the Seoul AI Safety Summit honour their commitments made at that summit. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) We expect all signatories to the Seoul commitments to stand by their agreements. The AI Security Institute, within DSIT, has ongoing discussions will all major developers, about the implementation of frontier AI frameworks that guide the safe development of AI. |
Nurseries
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the (a) adequacy and (b) clarity of HM Revenue & Customs guidance for employers on workplace nursery schemes. Answered by Darren Jones - Chief Secretary to the Treasury The workplace nursery scheme exemption allows employers to offer childcare support to employees without incurring income tax or National Insurance (NI) charges, provided certain conditions are met.
HMRC publishes online guidance on the use of workplace nursery schemes which is reviewed frequently and was last updated in August 2024.
In July 2024 HMRC published an article in its Agent Update as a reminder to businesses of the conditions to be met for the tax exemption to apply following increased awareness of a number of scheme operators advertising their service as having HMRC approval were the partnership requirements were not met.
The article can be found here: Issue 121 of Agent Update - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Employer Supported Childcare schemes are voluntary arrangements. The Government supports these initiatives through relevant tax and NICs reliefs, but it is up to the employer to decide whether or not to offer childcare support to its employees.
The schemes primarily operate through salary sacrifice arrangements, as childcare is one of the few areas where salary sacrifice tax reliefs are still available.
Employers can choose to offer a workplace nursery scheme as part of their employee benefits package to attract and retain skilled employees.
With Tax-Free Childcare, eligible parents can simply open an online account and make payments directly to their childcare provider. For every £8 a parent deposits into their account, the government adds £2 to help with the cost of childcare.
As such, there is no requirement for employers to adopt the schemes. |
Childcare: Employment
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Tuesday 8th July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps she is taking to encourage employers to adopt (a) tax-free childcare and (b) other workplace nursery schemes. Answered by Darren Jones - Chief Secretary to the Treasury The workplace nursery scheme exemption allows employers to offer childcare support to employees without incurring income tax or National Insurance (NI) charges, provided certain conditions are met.
HMRC publishes online guidance on the use of workplace nursery schemes which is reviewed frequently and was last updated in August 2024.
In July 2024 HMRC published an article in its Agent Update as a reminder to businesses of the conditions to be met for the tax exemption to apply following increased awareness of a number of scheme operators advertising their service as having HMRC approval were the partnership requirements were not met.
The article can be found here: Issue 121 of Agent Update - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Employer Supported Childcare schemes are voluntary arrangements. The Government supports these initiatives through relevant tax and NICs reliefs, but it is up to the employer to decide whether or not to offer childcare support to its employees.
The schemes primarily operate through salary sacrifice arrangements, as childcare is one of the few areas where salary sacrifice tax reliefs are still available.
Employers can choose to offer a workplace nursery scheme as part of their employee benefits package to attract and retain skilled employees.
With Tax-Free Childcare, eligible parents can simply open an online account and make payments directly to their childcare provider. For every £8 a parent deposits into their account, the government adds £2 to help with the cost of childcare.
As such, there is no requirement for employers to adopt the schemes. |
People's Health Trust: Public Health
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the decline in the People's Health Trust's turnover and funding on local public health initiatives. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government recognises the valuable part played by third sector organisations in tackling health inequalities and the social determinants of health, and commends the work of the People’s Health Trust in providing funding and support to left-behind communities. Much of what determines our health and wellbeing is influenced by factors other than health services. The roots of sickness too often lie in poverty, poor housing, poor education, poor work, and poor access to the things that make life worth living like culture, sport, and recreation. We are taking action on the social determinants of health, through our Health Mission, to reduce the gap in healthy life expectancy. |
Health Lottery
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the Health Lottery's decisions to (a) divest from the People's Health Trust and (b) create its own funding distribution vehicle on organisations receiving funding from that lottery. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The department and the Gambling Commission have regular discussions covering gambling regulation, including society lotteries. The department has not held recent discussions with the Gambling Commission on the Health Lottery’s arrangements for distributing funds. The Gambling Act 2005 provides for the definition of a non-commercial society lottery and how proceeds can be used. All licensed lottery operators are expected to put in place arrangements to make sure that the proceeds of each lottery are distributed in a lawful and compliant way. That includes ensuring that a minimum of 20% of proceeds are awarded to good causes. The oversight of licences for society lotteries, including ensuring operators remain compliant with its statutory responsibilities, is a matter for the Gambling Commission. More information about the Gambling Commission’s principles for licensing and regulation, compliance and enforcement under the Gambling Act 2005 can be found on the Commission’s website.
|
Lotteries
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to ensure society lotteries are being run in the public interest. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The department and the Gambling Commission have regular discussions covering gambling regulation, including society lotteries. The department has not held recent discussions with the Gambling Commission on the Health Lottery’s arrangements for distributing funds. The Gambling Act 2005 provides for the definition of a non-commercial society lottery and how proceeds can be used. All licensed lottery operators are expected to put in place arrangements to make sure that the proceeds of each lottery are distributed in a lawful and compliant way. That includes ensuring that a minimum of 20% of proceeds are awarded to good causes. The oversight of licences for society lotteries, including ensuring operators remain compliant with its statutory responsibilities, is a matter for the Gambling Commission. More information about the Gambling Commission’s principles for licensing and regulation, compliance and enforcement under the Gambling Act 2005 can be found on the Commission’s website.
|
Health Lottery
Asked by: Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what recent discussions she has had with the Gambling Commission on The Health Lottery’s new arrangements for distributing funds. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The department and the Gambling Commission have regular discussions covering gambling regulation, including society lotteries. The department has not held recent discussions with the Gambling Commission on the Health Lottery’s arrangements for distributing funds. The Gambling Act 2005 provides for the definition of a non-commercial society lottery and how proceeds can be used. All licensed lottery operators are expected to put in place arrangements to make sure that the proceeds of each lottery are distributed in a lawful and compliant way. That includes ensuring that a minimum of 20% of proceeds are awarded to good causes. The oversight of licences for society lotteries, including ensuring operators remain compliant with its statutory responsibilities, is a matter for the Gambling Commission. More information about the Gambling Commission’s principles for licensing and regulation, compliance and enforcement under the Gambling Act 2005 can be found on the Commission’s website.
|
MP Financial Interests |
---|
14th July 2025
Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to Switzerland between 18 June 2025 and 19 June 2025 Source |
14th July 2025
Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour - Tooting) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 10 June 2025 - £300.00 Source |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Seventh sitting)
111 speeches (20,549 words) Committee stage: 7th sitting Thursday 3rd July 2025 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Sixth sitting)
56 speeches (14,117 words) Committee stage: 6th sitting Thursday 3rd July 2025 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting)
37 speeches (9,031 words) Committee stage: 5th sitting Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport Mentions: 1: None Gallery who have not met me yet—you have a different Chair from the one this morning—my name is Dr Rosena Allin-Khan - Link to Speech |
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting)
66 speeches (15,619 words) Committee stage: 4th sitting Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Public Bill Committees Department for Transport |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jul. 09 2025
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-25: Progress of the bill Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Briefing papers Found: Cheam) (Lib Dem) • Matt Vickers (Stockton West) (Con) Sir Roger Gale, Emma Lewell, and Dr Rosena Allin-Khan |
Jul. 02 2025
Chair’s provisional selection and grouping of amendments in Committee - 3 July 2025 Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] 2024-26 Selection of amendments: Commons Found: course of debate on amendments to the clause/schedule (Standing Order No. 68) Chairs: Dr Rosena Allin-Khan |