1994 RAF Chinook Crash Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

1994 RAF Chinook Crash

Peter Dowd Excerpts
Wednesday 26th November 2025

(1 day, 5 hours ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Peter Dowd Portrait Peter Dowd (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Order. If the Minister wants to give way, she is perfectly entitled to, but you should not force it by standing up.

Tessa Munt Portrait Tessa Munt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

--- Later in debate ---
Louise Sandher-Jones Portrait Louise Sandher-Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Exactly. It is a sound that the hon. Gentleman and I obviously know very well. Again, this goes back to my service in the Intelligence Corps. Before I deployed to Afghanistan, someone who was interested in my safety, and who was in the corps, told me to be careful, because it is when travelling that, unfortunately, we in the Intelligence Corps tend to lose our personnel. I am well aware that this is not the only crash in which we have lost members of the corps.

We are well aware of that every time we get into a military aircraft, particularly if it will be flying in hostile conditions. Every time I climbed into an aircraft, predominantly RAF Pumas, that had to fly in certain tactical ways—a bit more acrobatically than usual—I, and every single person on that flight, put so much trust in those who maintained, certified and produced the airframe. It is the work of many people to ensure that someone, whether the pilot or a passenger on the flight, can trust that it will get them from A to B as it should. That trust also extends to knowing that if anything happens to a flight, there will be truth and accountability in getting to the bottom of what went wrong, whatever the cause may be, without fear or favour. I very much acknowledge that principle today.

I also acknowledge the level of anger felt by those represented by the Chinook Justice Campaign. The noble Lord Coaker has written to them to invite representatives to meet him, the Minister for the Armed Forces and me, with the meeting scheduled for 16 December. I understand that the families and loved ones of the 29 people killed that day continue to search for answers to explain what went wrong. The review that was undertaken by Lord Philip concluded that the cause of the accident is likely never to be known, and I am truly sorry for that. Once again, I thank the hon. Member for North Down for securing the debate.

Peter Dowd Portrait Peter Dowd (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Before I call Alex Easton, I remind Members that I have allowed them more flexibility in coming and going than I would ordinarily, given the sensitivity of the issue and people having arrived late. Please bear that in mind in future.

--- Later in debate ---
Louise Sandher-Jones Portrait Louise Sandher-Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

They would have to go through the FOI process, which of course is not—[Interruption.]

Peter Dowd Portrait Peter Dowd (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Order. Let the Minister answer the question.