Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Oral Answers to Questions

Paul Blomfield Excerpts
Tuesday 19th March 2013

(11 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Pat Glass Portrait Pat Glass (North West Durham) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

11. What plans he has for the future of the probation service; and if he will make a statement.

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield (Sheffield Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

12. What plans he has for the future of the probation service; and if he will make a statement.

Jeremy Wright Portrait Jeremy Wright
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The transforming rehabilitation consultation closed on 22 February 2013. Our proposed reforms will help reduce reoffending by opening up the provision of probation services to a wider range of providers and by extending rehabilitative provision to those serving less than 12 months in prison. We will respond to the consultation and bring forward detailed plans in due course.

--- Later in debate ---
Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - -

My probation trust in south Yorkshire is not alone in being concerned about the proposal to split responsibility for offenders between public and private providers, depending on the level of risk, as that introduces a dangerous artificial divide that fails to take account of the way in which risk fluctuates. Will the Minister tell the House how many offenders on licence saw their risk level change between medium and high over the past 12 months, and how many of them committed serious offences in that period?

Jeremy Wright Portrait Jeremy Wright
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is right that one of the major issues that has arisen through this process is the dynamic nature of risk, and we fully appreciate that that is an important subject. None the less, it is important to look at the need to make the best use of the skills of the probation service. There are considerable skills within the probation service in managing the risk of serious harm, which is why we propose that those offenders who pose the highest risk should be managed directly. We also think that it would be good to bring in new ideas from those who work in the voluntary and private sectors to manage the reoffending rates of medium and low-risk offenders. As to the point he makes, it will be clearly crucial for good relationships to exist between the public sector probation service and those providing work for medium and lower-risk offenders, and we will build into the system those safeguards.