Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Points of Order

Nigel Evans Excerpts
Thursday 11th November 2010

(14 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Lammy Portrait Mr David Lammy (Tottenham) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Can you advise the House of the rules on parliamentary privilege? Certain Conservative Members have used the opportunity of the statement to slander NUS presidents and other members of the NUS, and it is clearly unacceptable.

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Nigel Evans)
- Hansard - -

Mr Lammy, you have made your point in your way. You will know—

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

Is it further to the same point of order?

Kevin Brennan Portrait Kevin Brennan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

indicated dissent.

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

You will know the rules of the House, Mr Lammy, and what privilege entails. You have made your point in your usual way.

Kevin Brennan Portrait Kevin Brennan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Can you investigate whether there is currently any obstruction to accessing the House, because no comments or contributions were made by Liberal Democrat Members during the previous statement?

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

I certainly called Tom Brake; he had no problem getting in, and I understand that he has had no problem getting out.

Ian Mearns Portrait Ian Mearns (Gateshead) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. The answer given by the Secretary of State to a point that I made about access to work grants contradicted one that I had been given by his own Department in a response to a constituent’s inquiry. May I ask that the Secretary of State come back to clarify the position?

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

Both the Secretary of State and those on the Treasury Bench will have heard the point made, but I do not want an extension of the recent debate.

Bill presented

European Union Bill

Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57)

Secretary William Hague, supported by the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, Danny Alexander, Mr Patrick McLoughlin, Mr Oliver Letwin, Mr David Lidington, Mr Jeremy Browne, Mr Alistair Carmichael, Mr Henry Bellingham and Alistair Burt, presented a Bill to make provision about treaties relating to the European Union and decisions made under them, including provision implementing the Protocol signed at Brussels on 23 June 2010 amending the Protocol (No. 36) on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community; and to make provision about the means by which directly applicable or directly effective European Union law has effect in the United Kingdom.

Bill read the First time; to be read a Second time tomorrow, and to be printed (Bill 106) with explanatory notes (Bill 106-EN).

William Cash Portrait Mr William Cash (Stone) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I raised earlier with the Leader of the House my Committee’s concerns at the extremely short time between the presentation of the European Union Bill and its Second Reading. The Bill deals with matters of enormous constitutional importance and it would be appropriate, within the terms of reference of my Committee, to guarantee that we are given adequate time to consider it. I would be grateful, Mr Deputy Speaker, if you would be kind enough to take that point on board for the purposes of ensuring that, within the Standing Orders, my Committee has appropriate time to deal with the Bill.

Nigel Evans Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Nigel Evans)
- Hansard - -

I have listened to what you have had to say, Mr Cash, and you have made the point that you wished to make.

We now move on to the main business of the day, but before I call Margaret Hodge to move the motion on her Committee’s report, I should remind the House that the Backbench Business Committee has recommended that this item take no longer than 15 minutes. We will then move on to the main debate on policy for growth.