Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Oral Answers to Questions

Nigel Adams Excerpts
Monday 4th November 2013

(10 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I wish I could guarantee that it will not plummet any further, but I strongly suspect that this has been a long-standing problem. I am pleased to say that the Government take it seriously, which is why we are doing the many things that we are doing precisely to address those issues.

Nigel Adams Portrait Nigel Adams (Selby and Ainsty) (Con)
- Hansard - -

18. What estimate has the Minister made of the number of service personnel who could benefit from the new forces Help to Buy scheme?

Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I cannot give my hon. Friend a figure, but as the scheme is worth £200 million we can be confident that it will be many thousands.

--- Later in debate ---
Philip Dunne Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Mr Philip Dunne)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Gentleman was in the Chamber and listening to my earlier response to the Member for Ogmore (Huw Irranca-Davies), he will have heard that there was a single example of a penalty for late payment out of 4 million transactions last year. Where is the evidence to substantiate the allegation made by the hon. Member for Sefton Central (Bill Esterson)?

Nigel Adams Portrait Nigel Adams (Selby and Ainsty) (Con)
- Hansard - -

T8. What discussions has the Secretary of State had with European Ministers on preparations for the European Council on defence?

Andrew Murrison Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Dr Andrew Murrison)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Discussions have been extensive, as my hon. Friend would expect. The December Council summit is very important and I am pleased to say that we have been leading like-minded partner nations in the debate to set the agenda, which will be very much about capability and complementarity with NATO. It will most certainly not be about laying down more concrete, which is a prerogative of sovereign states, or, indeed, instituting more command wiring diagrams, which has absolutely nothing to do with our collective security and defence, and everything to do with the misguided political nostrum of ever-closer union.