Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill (Eighth sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury
Thursday 1st February 2018

(6 years, 9 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
I will briefly refer to the testimony of Mr Joel Blackwell of the Hansard Society to the Committee regarding clause 51. He stressed that a sunset clause amendment was suitable, that the clause’s powers are not required to be used in perpetuity, and that similar sunset clauses to those included in clauses 7 to 9 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill would bring consistency and thus make “perfect sense”. He supported the view of the Lords Committee.
Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Is it not important that the Government take account of the evidence we have had from the Hansard Society supporting protections from whoever happens to be in Government in the future?

Jonathan Reynolds Portrait Jonathan Reynolds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I firmly agree. Members on both sides of the Committee have referred to the testimony the Hansard Society gave in the evidence sessions. It is not just the Opposition who have concerns. I would very much like to be a real, not shadow, Treasury Minister one day. Even then, we would require the proper checks and balances to be in place. It still seems counter-intuitive to include time limits in the overall European Union (Withdrawal) Bill but not in today’s Bill, when the principles we have established apply similarly to both. As with our other arguments on sunset clauses, we do not see how the Government can justify the use of the powers in the clause in perpetuity. We have established that that should not happen, and the Government have not yet been able to refute that case.

I emphasise again that we all have a duty to check the powers of the Executive and to ensure that we do not allow them to change the balance of power permanently in their favour. The time period of two years should be generous enough to fill any gap in provisions that may come about from the end of delegated powers through other channels. Sunset clauses provide a vital check on delegated powers, and I urge members on both sides of the Committee to support the amendment to help to mitigate the constitutional risks introduced by the Bill.

--- Later in debate ---
Peter Dowd Portrait Peter Dowd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was trying to show that in this case there is a requirement for a sunset clause. It is absolutely crucial that we have sunset clauses and I am trying to show—I know that you will appreciate this, Mrs Main—that they are capable of being delivered.

Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - -

Is not having a sunset clause in place definite evidence of Parliament taking back control, not just now but into the future?

Peter Dowd Portrait Peter Dowd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is spot on. We have raised that issue time after time. Having sunset clauses and taking control back is a sign of a confident Government who are strong and stable and know their direction of travel. That is why I am sure that every Government Member of the Committee will support the amendment’s specific proposal for a sunset clause.