Mark Pritchard
Main Page: Mark Pritchard (Conservative - The Wrekin)Department Debates - View all Mark Pritchard's debates with the Ministry of Defence
(15 years, 3 months ago)
Commons Chamber Mark Pritchard (The Wrekin) (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Mark Pritchard (The Wrekin) (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        11. If he will consider, as part of the strategic defence and security review, the merits of the Army returning to RAF St Athan rather than RAF Cosford.
 The Minister for the Armed Forces (Nick Harvey)
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Minister for the Armed Forces (Nick Harvey) 
        
    
        
    
        Plans for the defence training review package 1 project remain unchanged, and consequently it is still planned for 102 Logistics Brigade to relocate to RAF Cosford in 2018 under the BORONA programme. Like everything else in the defence world, that is subject to the strategic defence and security review. At this point, no decisions have been taken.
 Mark Pritchard
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Mark Pritchard 
        
    
        
    
        Let me be clear: Shropshire has a long and proud history of working with the British Army, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy, but does it not make sense, given the presence of the excellent special forces support group and 1st Battalion the Parachute Regiment, and indeed the logistic hangars and a very long runway indeed at RAF St Athan in Wales, for 102 Logistics Brigade to return to St Athan rather than to RAF Cosford in Shropshire?
 Nick Harvey
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Nick Harvey 
        
    
        
    
        My hon. Friend is aware that there were two different proposals in the final analysis for the defence training review facilities: Cosford and St Athan. Those were subject to the most detailed scrutiny to decide which was the better fit for our defence requirements and the decision was that the defence training review should relocate facilities to St Athan. We believe that there is an obvious synergy between that and other work at St Athan, particular in high technology, and a lot of work has already gone into preparing for that move. To change course now, as he suggests, would undo a great deal of investment that has already been made and add considerably to the final cost.