All 1 Debates between Maria Eagle and Peter Gibson

Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Bill (Morning sitting)

Debate between Maria Eagle and Peter Gibson
Committee stage
Wednesday 15th December 2021

(2 years, 4 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Act 2022 View all Approved Premises (Substance Testing) Act 2022 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Peter Gibson Portrait Peter Gibson (Darlington) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Mundell. I commend my hon. Friend the Member for Aylesbury for expertly guiding the Bill through Second Reading and into Committee. I know from recent experience that that can be a challenging task; I congratulate him on navigating the process to this stage.

Sadly, we know that psychoactive drugs are becoming more prevalent in approved premises across the United Kingdom and are undermining the important work there. I welcome clause 1, which, building on the recommendation of the prisons and probation ombudsman, would allow managers to authorise approved premises staff to ask for and require a urine sample, rather than an oral fluid test, from any resident. The sample could then be used to identify a controlled drug, a prescription-only medicine or a psychoactive substance in the resident’s body.

Maria Eagle Portrait Maria Eagle (Garston and Halewood) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I congratulate the hon. Member on his own experience with Bills, which he has recently acquired, I think. Does he agree that enabling testing for a wider range of substances ought to prevent those living in approved premises who are tempted to take these substances from doing so, because they know that they can be detected for longer? It might help those living in approved premises to not reoffend.